Apple v Samsung order to propose schedules for preliminary injunction process
W
Description
July 2, 2011 court order requesting Apple and Samsung to propose a joint schedule or alternative schedules for the build up to a decision on Apple's motion for a preliminary injunction.
Document Sample


Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document95 Filed07/02/11 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
10
APPLE INC., a California corporation, ) Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
For the Northern District of California
11 )
Plaintiff, ) ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON
United States District Court
12 v. ) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
) PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
13 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., A )
Korean business entity; SAMSUNG )
14 ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a New York )
corporation; SAMSUNG )
15 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, LLC, )
a Delaware limited liability company, )
16 )
Defendants. )
17 )
)
18
19 On July 1, 2011, Plaintiff Apple, Inc. filed a motion for preliminary injunction and
20 requested a hearing date of August 5, 2011, five weeks from the date of filing. Based on the
21 parties’ previous representations, it appeared that the parties intended to conduct discovery
22 pertinent to the preliminary injunction motion following the filing of the opening and opposition
23 briefs. It appears that the schedule proposed by Apple would not provide sufficient time for such
24 discovery. Accordingly, the Court requests input from the parties regarding a reasonable time
25 frame for briefing and hearing Apple’s motion. By July 8, 2011, the parties shall file a joint
26 statement, not to exceed 3 pages, proposing a briefing schedule and hearing date. If the parties are
27 //
28 //
1
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Case5:11-cv-01846-LHK Document95 Filed07/02/11 Page2 of 2
1 unable to agree upon a proposed schedule, each side may propose a schedule and briefly outline the
2 reasons supporting the requested schedule.
3 IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5 Dated: July 2, 2011 _________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
6 United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
For the Northern District of California
11
United States District Court
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 11-CV-01846-LHK
ORDER REGARDING HEARING ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
Related docs
Other docs by FlorianMueller
Apple v Samsung order to propose schedules for preliminary injunction process
Views: 404 | Downloads: 4
Lodsys patent infringement lawsuit against New York Times Co. and five other defendants
Views: 683 | Downloads: 13
Get documents about "