Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

Dump Data to Excel

VIEWS: 6 PAGES: 24

  • pg 1
									Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                   Initiator                      Mail_Code       Init_Phone      Init_Fax                               RID_Title                                 Doc_No     Paragraph_Page                                 Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        1 Mike Capell/AMS               michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Transfer Rate Ambiguities                                    ACP-RP-CGS-002                       There is a lack of consistency and lack of clarity in the data rate
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                requirements for AMS and ACOP. ACOP documents are mostly
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                correct in showing 4Mbit/s as a requirement but this has been
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                interpreted to mean that the AMS-02 data rate has been increased.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        2 Mike Capell/AMS               michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Incorrect Base Document for Payload Integration Agreement    ACP-IC-CGS-001                       This document was based from SSP-52000-EIA-ERP Issue A. The
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                ISS program now requires this document be based on SSP57066.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        3 Mike Capell/AMS               michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Project Schedule Relationship to SSP57057 and PIM Schedule   ACP-PL-CGS-003                       It is difficult to understand the relationship to between the ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                project schedule and SSP 57057 (and associated PIM schedule). It
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                is not clear that the project schedule and the PIM schedule
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                reconcile.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        4 Mike Capell/AMS               michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Front Panel LCD Display                                      ACP-SY-CGS-001                       AMS-02 has a mission success motivated requirement that the crew
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                be able to rapidly respond to AMS-02 off-nominal issues. The design
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                detailed in this specification does not fulfil this requirement. In
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                particular the design does not have the self-sufficient means to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                display ad-hoc information.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        5 Mike Capell/AMS               michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Clarify Software Responsibilities Between CGS, ASI, and AMS-02. ACP-SY-CGS-001                    There needs to be clarification on software responsibilities based on
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                the delivery of application software from ASI to CGS and low level
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                software from CGS (see ACP-PL-CGS-003 Section 2.2, Page 5).
                            Recommend                                                        Team_Member                                  Resolution                                           RID_Category   Child   Parent   Take_Board            Disposition         Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature     Sign_Date   Intiator_Dispo
1. Implement a clear explaination of the data rates for ACOP and         Team 1 - Avionics                     Clarify documentation                                              Possible Technical Broke                     No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
AMS-02, including expected average data rates and supported peak
data rates. 2. Provide a simple diagram showing the AMS data
source, internal buffer s (JBU) , ACOP and downlink with these data
rates. Suggested text: The AMS-02 experiment has been designed
to meet its physics goals when producing data at an average rate of
2MBit/s. Data is produced continuously. However, the physics that
will be measured is unknown, and so are the peak and average data
rates -- 2Mbit/s average is the best estimate. Within AMS-02 a four-
fold redundant 1GByte buffer (JBU) is provide to smooth the data
flow and to allow for short term (less than an hour) interuptions in the
data output from AMS, for example when the hard disk drives are
being swapped within ACOP. After any such interuption, the data
rate capability in ACOP must be able to make up for the lost time
while not falling behind on the fresh data. Therefore ACOP should
be able to process data at a rate of at least twice the average data
rate from AMS, namely 4Mbit/s. Impact if recommendation not
implemented: ACOP may meet its stated data rate cababilities but
fail to properly support AMS.




1. Recreate this document from the correct base. 2. Provide the  Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation         Update documentation to match with current NASA requirements.      Documentation                                No           Approved                                      Board Chair   Trent Martin    3/10/2005 Yes
broadest range of transportation options (STS Middeck, MPLM,
ATV, Progress, Skyhook). 3. Show relationship to JSC-57113 (AMS-
02 PIA) which levies ACOP requirements as well. Impact if
recommendation not implemented: ACOP may not meet its internal
requirements but not be allowed to fly.



1. Use SSP57057 nomenclature for the project schedule. 2.       Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation          Reconcile schedules                                                Documentation                                No           Approved                                      Board Chair   Trent Martin    3/10/2005 Yes
Reconcile milestones between the ACOP project schedule and the
PIM schedule. Impact if recommendation not implemented: Project
could misunderstand schedule requirements and work to the wrong
schedule.

1. The AMS-02 top level functional requirements (see “ACOP         Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation       Incorporate LCD into specification and implement                   Possible Technical Broke                                  Approved                                      Board Chair   Trent Martin    3/10/2005 Yes
Design Report” ACP-RP-CGS-003 Issue 1 Section 4.1 Page 16)
should be mentioned in Section 4.2, page 17 of this document. 2.
Any discrepancies from the AMS-02 top level functional
requirements should be formally noted in ACP-SY-CGS-001. 3. ACP-
SY-CGS-001 should specify an LCD. The LCD should be not less
the 320x240 dots with 8 bits of color. The LCD should be not less
then 4 inches diagonal. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
Failure to meet top level requirements and inability to track this
failure.




1. The ultimate source of application software should be identified as Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation   The aim of this document is to specify the requriements for baisc    Documentation                              No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 Yes
the AMS-02 Collaboration (also in ACP-PL-CGS-003). 2. ACP-SQ-                                                  software and interfaces between application SW and basic SW.
CGS-001 should have requirements segregated between application                                                CGS will specify the proposal for requriements to be applied to the
(AMS-02 developed /“ASI” delivered) and low level (CGS                                                         contract related to the development of the Application SW. This will
developed). 3. The cooperation in software development should be                                               include at least the document ACP-SQ-CGS-001, delivered in the
directly addressed in the ACP-PL-CGS-003 Section 7.2 Interfaces                                                PDR data package.
Management, Page 14. It would be difficult for ASI to directly
participate in this loop. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
Failure to provide and verify software that meets requirements.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward   Closure_Concur   Closure_Date   RID_ID   Action_No            Actionee   Act_Phone                                 Act_Title   Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                         36545               1 CGS                           Clarify documentation                      6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                         36549               1 CGS                           Update documentation                       6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                         36552               1 P. Dennett                    Reconcile schedules with OZ               4/21/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                  36556               1 CGS                           Implement LCD                              6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                  36559               1 CGS                           Develop proposal                          3/10/2005 Closed
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                         Initiator                       Mail_Code       Init_Phone      Init_Fax                             RID_Title                                   Doc_No     Paragraph_Page                                      Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        5 Mike Capell/AMS                      michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              Clarify Software Responsibilities Between CGS, ASI, and AMS-02. ACP-SY-CGS-001                        There needs to be clarification on software responsibilities based on
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           the delivery of application software from ASI to CGS and low level
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           software from CGS (see ACP-PL-CGS-003 Section 2.2, Page 5).




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        6 Mike Capell/AMS                      michael.capell@cern.ch         +41 (22) 767 4706              The List of Spare Parts No Longer Matches the ACOP design.   ACP-SY-CGS-001                           The list of spare parts no longer matches the ACOP design.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        7 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                   ACOP Hard Drive Sparing                                      ACP-RP-CGS-003                       4.2 The required hard drive sparing is incorrect. Paragraph 4.2 states
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           that a set of 4 hard drives will provide 20 days of recording capability
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           and that 20 spare drives will provide 150 days of recording
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           capability. Dividing the 150 day goal by 20 days tells you that ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           needs 7.5 sets of hard drives to satisfy the 150 day requirement.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Since there are 4 hard drives in each set, a total of 30 spare hard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           drives (4x7.5) are needed to be meet the 150 day sparing goal. But
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           since ACOP drives are swapped 4 at a time, the number of spare or
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           stowed hard drives must be increased to 32.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        7 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                   ACOP Hard Drive Sparing                                      ACP-RP-CGS-003                       4.2 The required hard drive sparing is incorrect. Paragraph 4.2 states
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           that a set of 4 hard drives will provide 20 days of recording capability
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           and that 20 spare drives will provide 150 days of recording
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           capability. Dividing the 150 day goal by 20 days tells you that ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           needs 7.5 sets of hard drives to satisfy the 150 day requirement.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Since there are 4 hard drives in each set, a total of 30 spare hard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           drives (4x7.5) are needed to be meet the 150 day sparing goal. But
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           since ACOP drives are swapped 4 at a time, the number of spare or
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           stowed hard drives must be increased to 32.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        8 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                   ACOP Hard Drive Requirements vs Shuttle EOM                  ACP-RP-CGS-003                       4.2 Paragraph 4.2 states that ´´New batches of hard drives will be
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           delivered by STS and original master copies of the AMS-02 data will
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           be returned to Earth by STS.´´ Current NASA plans are to end
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           Shuttle flights prior to the planned nominal 3 year AMS-02 science
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           mission. The only non-Shuttle return capability is Soyuz.
                          Recommend                                                     Team_Member                                       Resolution                                           RID_Category   Child   Parent   Take_Board            Disposition         Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature     Sign_Date   Intiator_Dispo
1. The ultimate source of application software should be identified as Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation   The aim of this document is to specify the requriements for baisc    Documentation                              No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 Yes
the AMS-02 Collaboration (also in ACP-PL-CGS-003). 2. ACP-SQ-                                                  software and interfaces between application SW and basic SW.
CGS-001 should have requirements segregated between application                                                CGS will specify the proposal for requriements to be applied to the
(AMS-02 developed /“ASI” delivered) and low level (CGS                                                         contract related to the development of the Application SW. This will
developed). 3. The cooperation in software development should be                                               include at least the document ACP-SQ-CGS-001, delivered in the
directly addressed in the ACP-PL-CGS-003 Section 7.2 Interfaces                                                PDR data package.
Management, Page 14. It would be difficult for ASI to directly
participate in this loop. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
Failure to provide and verify software that meets requirements.




The spare parts list should be modified as follows: • (2) Hard Disks • Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation   Update spares list                                                 Possible Technical Broke                     No           Approved                                      Board Chair   Trent Martin    3/10/2005 Yes
(1) ACOP-SBC • (1) ACOP-T101 • (1) ACOP-T102 • (1) ACOP-T103
• (1) ACOP-PS • (1) ACOP Power cable • (1) ACOP Data cable • (1)
Fan with mounting kit • (1) Exchangable Filter, if filters are
implemented. In general it should be noted that the exact spares to
be provided will need to be adjusted if the design evolves. Impact if
recommendation not implemented: Failure to provide useful spares.




Properly document the number of hard drives required as logistics Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation        Update documentation to 120 day minimum goal & add traffic model Documentation                                  No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 Yes
spares. Impact if recommendation not implemented: 1) AMS-02 risks
running out of hard drives to record data. 2) Logistics sparing directly
translates into upmass/downmass and on-orbit stowage
requirements that require significant lead time for planning purposes.
Due to competing requirements on these constrained resources, late
changes are not always accommodated.




Properly document the number of hard drives required as logistics Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation        Update documentation to 120 day minimum goal & add traffic model Documentation                                  No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 Yes
spares. Impact if recommendation not implemented: 1) AMS-02 risks
running out of hard drives to record data. 2) Logistics sparing directly
translates into upmass/downmass and on-orbit stowage
requirements that require significant lead time for planning purposes.
Due to competing requirements on these constrained resources, late
changes are not always accommodated.




1) The only non-Shuttle return capability is Soyuz, and the non-    Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation      ACOP team will supply traffic model and NASA/OZ should             Documentation                   7            No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 Yes
Shuttle planned launch capability during the AMS nominal mission                                               determine if our model is acceptable.
timeframe are Progress, ATV, and HTV. The resupply and return
description should be changed to be less Shuttle-specific. 2) The
plan to return filled hard drives should be reviewed since the data
will be downlinked by ACOP. The return manifests are typically
oversubscribed and will get worse as Shuttle approaches EOM and
only Soyuz remains. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
ACOP hard drive resupply rates may not be achievable.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No            Actionee   Act_Phone                           Act_Title   Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                        36559               2 ASI                           Implement approach                   6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36565               1 CGS                           Update Spares List                   6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36569               1 P. Dennett                    Update documentation                 6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36569               2 P. Dennett                    Develop traffic model                6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36571
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                          Initiator                       Mail_Code       Init_Phone   Init_Fax                              RID_Title                   Doc_No       Paragraph_Page                                   Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235         9 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Hard Drive Sparing                         ACP-RP-CGS-003   5.3.8               The required hard drive sparing is incorrect. Paragraph 5.3.8 states
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        that a set of 4 hard drives will provide 20 days of recording capability
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        and that 20 spare drives will provide 150 days of recording
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        capability. Dividing the 150 day goal by 20 days tells you that ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        needs 7.5 sets of hard drives to satisfy the 150 day requirement.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Since there are 4 hard drives in each set, a total of 30 spare hard
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        drives (4x7.5) are needed to be meet the 150 day sparing goal. But
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        since ACOP drives are swapped 4 at a time, the number of spare or
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        stowed hard drives must be increased to 32 to satisfy the 150 day
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        requirement. The 8 sets of 4 drives results in the capability to record
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        160 days of AMS-02 data.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        10 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Hard Drive Requirements vs Shuttle EOM     ACP-RP-CGS-003   5.3.8               Paragraph 5.3.8 states that ´´New batches of hard drives will be
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        delivered by STS and the original master copies of the AMS-02 data
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        will be returned to Earth by STS.´´ Current NASA plans are to end
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Shuttle flights prior to the planned nominal 3 year AMS-02 science
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        mission. The only non-Shuttle return capability is Soyuz.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        11 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Transport Vehicle Prematurely Identified   ACP-RP-CGS-003   6.1.1               The second sentence implies that ACOP would only be transported
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        to orbit via Shuttle.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        11 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Transport Vehicle Prematurely Identified   ACP-RP-CGS-003   6.1.1               The second sentence implies that ACOP would only be transported
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        to orbit via Shuttle.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        12 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Thermal Design Lacks Fan                   ACP-RP-CGS-003   10.2.4              The second sentence implies that the Avionics Air Assembly will
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        provide sufficient airflow to cool the payload within the EXPRESS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Rack. The EXPRESS IDD (SSP 52000-IDD-ERP) requirement
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        5.3.1.3.1.3, ´´Fans´´, states that ´´The payload will provide its own
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        circulation fan for internal air circulation for both the MDL interface
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        and ISIS drawer interface.´´



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        13 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Thermal Design Lacks Fan                   ACP-RP-CGS-003   10.5.3              The first sentence implies that the Avionics Air Assembly will provide
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        sufficient airflow to cool the payload within the EXPRESS Rack. The
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        EXPRESS IDD (SSP 52000-IDD-ERP) requirement 5.3.1.3.1.3,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ´´Fans´´, states that ´´The payload will provide its own circulation fan
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        for internal air circulation for both the MDL interface and ISIS drawer
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        interface.´´



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        14 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance   winston.j.reid@boeing.com      281-226-4809                ACOP Hard Drive Replacement Clarification       ACP-RP-CGS-003   10.1.2              Sentence did not translate properly from Italian to English.
                          Recommend                                                   Team_Member                                       Resolution                           RID_Category   Child   Parent   Take_Board          Disposition   Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature   Sign_Date   Intiator_Dispo
Properly document the number of hard drives required as logistics Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation                                                         Documentation                   7            No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 Yes
spares. Impact if recommendation not implemented: 1) AMS-02 risks
running out of hard drives to record data. 2) Logistics sparing directly
translates into upmass/downmass and on-orbit stowage
requirements that require significant lead time for planning purposes.
Due to competing requirements on these constrained resources, late
changes are not always accommodated.




1) The only non-Shuttle return capability is Soyuz, and the non-    Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation                                                       Documentation                   7            No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
Shuttle planned launch capability during the AMS nominal mission
timeframe are Progress, ATV, and HTV. The resupply and return
description should be changed to be less Shuttle-specific. 2) The
plan to return filled hard drives should be reviewed since the data
will be downlinked by ACOP. The return manifests are typically
oversubscribed and will get worse as Shuttle approaches EOM and
only Soyuz remains. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
ACOP hard drive resupply rates may not be achievable.




Change ´´ACOP will be transported inside the Shuttle in power off Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation     Update document to include all possible vehicles.   Possible Technical Broke                     No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
condition´´ to ´´ACOP will be transported to orbit in a power off
condiition.´´ Impact if recommendation not implemented: The
statement would remain incorrect. ACOP will be transported to orbit
in an unpowered condition, however, the transport vehicle may be
non-Shuttle.



Change ´´ACOP will be transported inside the Shuttle in power off Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation     Update document to include all possible vehicles.   Possible Technical Broke                     No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
condition´´ to ´´ACOP will be transported to orbit in a power off
condiition.´´ Impact if recommendation not implemented: The
statement would remain incorrect. ACOP will be transported to orbit
in an unpowered condition, however, the transport vehicle may be
non-Shuttle.



The ACOP payload should comply with the EXPRESS IDD               Team 3 - Thermal                          Two fans have been implemented in the design.       Possible Technical Broke                     No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 Yes
requirement to ensure mission success. Impact if recommendation
not implemented: Payload may overheat during on-orbit operation
and lose AMS-02 mission data.




The ACOP payload should comply with the EXPRESS IDD               Team 3 - Thermal                                                                                                             12                         Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
requirement to ensure mission success. Impact if recommendation
not implemented: Payload may overheat during on-orbit operation
and lose AMS-02 mission data.




Change sentence from: ´´The crew should plug out and in the 4 Hard Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation    Document will be updated                            Documentation                                No           Approved                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
Drives every about 20 days´´ to ´´The crew should remove 4 full
hard drives and replace them with 4 empty hard drives from the
logistics spares approximately every 20 days.´´ Impact if
recommendation not implemented: Requirement would remain
unclear in this document.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No            Actionee    Act_Phone                                  Act_Title                                Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36573




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36575




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                        36578               1 CGS                              Update document                                                        6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                        36578               2 APO- Chris Tutt   281-461-5703   Provide to CGS and ASI all appropriate technical requirements         3/31/2005 Open
                                                                                                                                                                                    (structural, thermal, environmental, safety, etc - may work best as
                                                                                                                                                                                    soft stow item - note that none of these can be used as a return
                                                                                                                                                                                    vehicle for the ACOP assembly) for ATV, HTV, Progress, and
                                                                                                                                                                                    Soyuz




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36580




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36584




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36585               1 CGS                              Update document                                                        6/1/2005 Open
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                           Initiator                               Mail_Code                   Init_Phone   Init_Fax                             RID_Title          Doc_No       Paragraph_Page                                         Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        15 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance            winston.j.reid@boeing.com                  281-226-4809                ACOP Payload Dimensions               ACP-RP-CGS-003   10.1.2                    The planned ACOP payload dimensions are not explicitly stated in
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         this design report. Clearly documenting the dimensions
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         demonstrates that the sometimes confusing EXPRESS IDD
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         requirements are understood. The title of paragraph 10.1.2 refers to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         the IDD page 3-18, but the Figure 3-8A on IDD page 3-18 is titled
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         ´´ISS Locker,´´ not a middeck locker as paragraph 10.1.2 implies.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        16 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance            winston.j.reid@boeing.com                  281-226-4809                EXPRESS IDD Page References           ACP-RP-CGS-003   Section 10                Many paragraphs within Section 10 contain a reference to a specific
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         requirements page within the EXPRESS IDD. This is not a good
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         idea because the information being referenced may move between
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         document revisions.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        17 Winston Reid/United Space Alliance            winston.j.reid@boeing.com                  281-226-4809                ACOP Transmit/Receive Data Rates      ACP-RP-CGS-003                         5.1 Figure 5.1 provides an excellent diagram of AMS/ACOP data
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         interfaces and connectivity. However, it does not provide the specific
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         data rates that are driving the design of the payload and its
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         interfaces to ISS.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        18 Tracy R. Gill/NASA-KSC                        UB-G6/Tracy.R.Gill@nasa.gov                321-867-5824                ACOP Door Access                      ACP-RP-CGS-005   5 - Hardware Descr.       On Express Racks, locker 4 and 8 positions will not allow the locker
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         doors to open fully (opens just past 90 degrees) because they come
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         into contact with the bottom shelf. The ACOP front panel door
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         appears to not need to go much beyond 90 degrees of opening to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         allow for drive and board installation. It may not be a problem at all.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Attached is a photo showing a single stowage locker door opening.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         There was a a problem found at KSC with a payload installing
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         hardware that needed the door to open fully, but due to position 8,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         shelf and the structure ribs on the door did not allow for payload
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         installation of hardware.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        19 Bruce Sommer/ESCG                             B2SC/bruce.sommer@escg.jacobs.com          281-461-5700                ACOP Bolt Analysis Requirements       ACP-RP-CGS-005                             Bolt analysis in report does not follow NASA´s guidelines for bolt
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         analysis as specified in NSTS 08307 ´´Space Shuttle Criteria for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Preloaded Bolts´´.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        19 Bruce Sommer/ESCG                             B2SC/bruce.sommer@escg.jacobs.com          281-461-5700                ACOP Bolt Analysis Requirements       ACP-RP-CGS-005                             Bolt analysis in report does not follow NASA´s guidelines for bolt
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         analysis as specified in NSTS 08307 ´´Space Shuttle Criteria for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Preloaded Bolts´´.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        20 Richard L Weaver/Teledyne Brown Engineering   TBE/MS166/richard.l.weaver@msfc.nasa.gov   256-961-2004                Thermal Airflow                       ACP-RP-CGS-002   2.5.3                     ACOP Interface Specification ICD, Paragraph 2.5.3: ´´The current
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         baseline does not foresee to insert additional fans inside the ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         locker to reinforce the airflow.´´ Potenial exist for inadequate air flow
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         to hardrives. EXPRESS sub-rack payloads should be designed with
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         a fan for forced air flow.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        21 Richard Weaver/Teledyne Brown Engineering     TBE/MS166/richard.l.weaver@mfsc.nasa.gov   256-961-2004                Power Requirement                     ACP-RP-CGS-003   5.4.1                     Paragraph states ACOP power requirement is 200 Watts. Power
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Budget Tables in Sec 6 do not support this number. ACP-RP-CGS-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         004 paragraph 7.2 states maximum power draw is 70 watts
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         (Conflicting specifications).
                          Recommend                                                     Team_Member                                            Resolution                                          RID_Category          Child   Parent   Take_Board           Disposition   Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature   Sign_Date    Intiator_Dispo
1) Change sentence from: ´´The ACOP envelope shall meet the Mid Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation              They are explicitly dimensioned in the ICD.                       Documentation                                        No           Withdrawn                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
Deck locker (MDL) envelope.´´ to: ´´The ACOP envelope shall meet
the ISS Locker envelope as specified on SSP 52000-IDD-ERP, Rev
E, Figure 3-8A.´´ 2) Update ACP-RP-CGS-003 Figure 10-1 to show
ACOP payload dimensions. Impact if recommendation not
implemented: Payload risks designing to the wrong dimensions.




Instead of referencing a page, make the reference to the specific Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation            Will update documentation                                         Documentation                                        No           Approved                               Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
IDD paragragh number and book revision level. For example, USE:
´´SSP52000-IDD-ERP, Rev E, Figure 3-8A´´ instead of: ´´SSP52000-
IDD-ERP P3-18´´. Impact if recommendation not implemented:
Payload risks referencing wrong requirements paragraphs.



Update Figure 5.1 to explicitely identify the payload data rates   Team 2 - Program Mmgt & Documentation           We understand the request, but it may not be easy to implement.   Documentation                                        No           Withdrawn                              Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
(typical and max) required on each ISS connection between AMS
and ACOP. Impact if recommendation not implemented: Additional
insight to payload design requirements would be missing.



Simply be aware of the issue in case ACOP is placed in position 4 or Team 4 - Mechnical Design                     ACOP team will take into account and may make design              Design Info                                          No           Approved                               Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
position 8 of an EXPRESS Rack. This may limit access to the                                                        modification.
Compact PCI cards on the bottom of the ACOP chassis. Place
cards with least chances of requiring removal at the bottom of the
stack. Impact if recommendation not implemented: Potentially could
require removal of locker from rack for access to lower Compact PCI
cards if required to remove and replace those cards.




Revise ACOP bolt analysis to meet the requirements specified in    Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation                                                                     Possible Technical Broke                             No           Approved                               Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
NSTS 08307.


Revise ACOP bolt analysis to meet the requirements specified in    Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation                                                                     Possible Technical Broke                             No           Approved                               Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
NSTS 08307.


Comply with EXPRESS IDD (SSP-52000) paragraph 5.3.1.3.1.3 and Team 3 - Thermal                                                                                                       Possible Technical Broke               12            No           Approved                               Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
include a fax for forced air flow. See Attached Impace if
recommendation not implemented: ACOP hardware, hardrives, may
not receive adequate air flow for heat dissipation.




Reduce power requirement to match Section 6 power budget tables, Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation     The 200 W number is the ACOP power allocation. The 70 W number Clarification of Program Requirement                    No           Disapproved                            Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
or include an explaintion of why the power requirement in Paragraph                                                is our current estimate. Our requirements state that we will be less
5.4.1 is greater than 200% of the Power Budget Table numbers in                                                    than that allocation. We do not believe that we should change the
Secion 6. Imapact if Recommendation not implemented: Conflicting                                                   allocation until we have actual measured values from a flight unit.
specificaitons leads to confusion and difficulity in understanding and                                             The actual power will be documented in the ISS ICD.
projecting actual power requirements.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No           Actionee       Act_Phone                               Act_Title   Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36587




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36590               1 CGS                              Update documents                         6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36592




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36645




                  Open                                                                                                       36706               1 APO - Bruce Sommer               Provide specification to CGS and ASI    3/15/2005 Closed



                  Open                                                                                                       36706               2 CGS                              Update bolt analysis                     6/1/2005 Open



       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36814




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36846
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                             Initiator                                   Mail_Code                  Init_Phone   Init_Fax                               RID_Title                                  Doc_No          Paragraph_Page                                    Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        22 Richard Weaver/Teledyne Brown Engineering          TBE/MS166/richard.l.weaver@mfsc.nasa.gov   256-961-2004                Data Storage                                                  ACP-SP-CGS-001                            4.2 Paragraph states ACOP will require hard drive change outs every 20
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         days by the crew (30 minute operation). The Payload Integration
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Agreement (PIA) table 7.2 states a resupply of hard drives (72 per
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         year) will require up and down manifesting. Paragraph 6.1.3
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         identifies ACOP HDRL interfaces for communicaitons to the AMS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         and for High rate downlink. Is the Operations concept to record all
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         data captured and return to ground via hard disk?. If so why is the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         HDRL interface required. Or, is the Operations concept to record,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         then downlink all data. Crew time and up/down mass requirements
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         seem excessive and may be difficult to support.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        23 Richard Weaver/Teledyne Brown Engineering          TBE/MS166/richard.l.weaver@msfc.nasa.gov   256-961-2004                Command APIDs                                                 ACP-SP-CGS-001        6.3.2                  ACP-SQ-CGS-001 Paragraph 1.1 and 1.2 describe an EXPRESS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Payload Application running on the EXPRESS Laptop Computer
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        (ELC). There is no mention of a ACOP Payload application for a
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Portable Computer System (PCS) (i.e. computer deployed on the PL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        MDM 1553 bus or the C&C 1553 bus). Section 6.3.2 in the ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Interface Specification ICD list APIDs for PCS to LAP@ & LAP4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ISPRs. These APIDs are not needed. Section 6.3.2 in the ACOP
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Interface Specification ICD list APIDs for MCC-H to LAP@ & LAP4
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ISPRs. These APIDs are not needed because commands to US
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Payload ISPRs utilize POIC APIDs. In general, ACOP has not been
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        assigned to a ISPR location, therefore APID deffinition is premature
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        at this stage




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        24 Eric Phillips/Boeing PEI                           HB3-40/eric.n.phillips@boeing.com          281-226-6367                Acoustic Verification Requirement and Testing Clarification   ACP-PL-CGS-004        4.3/6.1.4.5.1          ´´Acoustic noise measurement will be performed on the FM only if
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        QM results are marginal´´. SSP 57000 requirements (Paragraph
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        4.3.12.3.3.1) states that acoustic measurements shall be made
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        using actual flight equipment even though prototype or qualification
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        units have been tested previously. This is due to the fact that
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        hardware, such as cooling fans, can have varying noise signatures
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        even though part numbers are identical.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        25 Eric Phillips/Boeing PEI & Sam Denham/Boeing PEI   HB3-40/eric.n.phillips@boeing.com          281-226-6367                Acoustic Fan Noise                                            ACP-RP-CGS-003                               ACOP is currently designed without a fan and will be required to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        implement one or more for compliance with EXPRESS rack air
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        flow/thermal requirements (See RID PIM-wjr-006 and PEI-TH-AP-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        001). Fans are potential noise impacts.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        26 Vergel Romero/Boeing PEI                           vergel.s.romero@boeing.com                 281-226-4498                Incorrect Version of SSP 50184                                Multiple Documents                           Documents and Sections: ACP-SP-CGS-001 (2.1) / ACP-PL-CGS-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        004 (2.1) / ACP-RP-CGS-002 (1.3.1) / ACP-RP-CGS-003 (2.1) /
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ACP-RP-CGS-004 (2.1) / ACP-SQ-CGS-001 (1.5.1) Applicable
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Documents Item 9 is referering to Feb 1996 version of SSP 50184.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        27 Vergel Romero/Boeing PEI                           vergel.s.romero@boeing.com                 281-226-4498                Clarification of Statement regarding APS configuration        Mulitiple Documents                          Documents and Sections Affected: ACP-SP-CGS-001 (5.1 sixth
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        paragraph) / ACP-RP-CGS-003 (5.1 fourth paragraph) / ACP-RP-
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        CGS-004 (5.1 fourth paragraph) Section 5.1 contains the following
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        statement: ´´The APS can be configured to tee data transmitted by
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        AMS-02 to both the HRFM and ACOP.´´



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        28 Vergel Romero/Boeing PEI                           vergel.s.romero@boeing.com                 281-226-4498                Unknown J7 UIP Location                                       Multiple Documents                           Documents and Sections Affected: ACP-SP-CGS-001 (6.1.3 fourth
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        bullet) / ACP-RP-CGS-003 (5.4.2 fourth bullet) / ACP-RP-CGS-004
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        (5.4.2 fourth bullet) These sections contain the following statement:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        ´´TX and RX under TESS (complete mission) and TX under MELFI
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        (as initiation location, may have to move).´´ The actual locations of
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        J7 connectors that will be provided to ACOP for use are still
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        unknown.
                           Recommend                                                          Team_Member                                          Resolution                                               RID_Category   Child   Parent   Take_Board            Disposition         Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature   Sign_Date    Intiator_Dispo
Develop an Operations Concept to clarify how ACOP is going to           Team 5 - Operations                            All data needs to be captured because it is an irreplacable scientific Design Info                                   No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
operate. If possible reduce crew time and up/down mass                                                                 data archive. Our intention is to be able to record all data on the hard
requirements. Impact if Recommendation not Implemented:                                                                drives and downlink all data.
Confusion and difficulity in understanding ACOP data downlink and
data storage requirements. Crew time and upmas are critical
resources, the inability to meet requirements could result in a loss of
science.




Delete APID table until manifested ISPR location can be           Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation        We will implement the recommendation.                                 Documentation                                  No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
determined. PEI will assign. Impact if recommendation not
implemented: Incorrect command APID information resulting in loss
of ground command capability.




Perform acoustic testing on Flight Model per requirement SSP           Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   SSP-52000-IDD-ERP Table 4-IX is the sub-rack level specification. Design Info                                        No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 Yes
57000 paragraph 4.3.12.3.3.1 unless a repeatable test on                                                               Testing will be done on the QM. Testing should be done on all flight
qualification unit shows consistency that payload is an insignificant                                                  models unless the noise source is an insignificant noise. SSP-57000
noise source. Impact if recommendation not implemented: If                                                             describes an insignificant noise source as 37 dBA at 2 feet away in
qualification model is close to or at the requirement level and the                                                    all directions.
flight model is not tested, there is a risk that the Flight Model will
exceed the individual payload requirement due to variations in noise
of the sub componets (i.e. fans).




Develop a noise control plan to budget and account for acoustics.     Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation    Fan has been added but was not part of the original datapackage.      Possible Technical Broke         24            No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
Develop an acoustic recovery plan if needed. Impact if
recommendation not implemented: If fans are installed and not
measured there is a risk of violating the requirements.



Change to SSP 50184 Revision B Dated May 25, 2001 Impact if    Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation           Will update document.                                                 Documentation                                  No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
recommendation not implemented: ACOP will be using an outdated
version of the document which was changed considerably.




Please clarify what the statement implies.                            Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation    The T configuration is an APS function. We have tested it on the      Design Info                                    No           Withdrawn                                     Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
                                                                                                                       ground during the AMS FIT at KSC in January 2005. It is
                                                                                                                       documented in the AMS PIA and ACOP PIA.




Indicate in the statement that since topology is not finalized, actual Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   The TESS location was provided to us by the ISS during the initial Design Info                                       No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
locations of J7 connectors are unknown and the length of fiber optic                                                   assessment several years ago. The second site was not finalized.
cable may vary. Impact if recommendation not implemented: If the                                                       We will remove references to specific J7 connections. However, the
fiber optic cable is designed before J7 Locations are known, cable                                                     documentation will state that we need 2 J7 connectors.
may be too short.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No            Actionee   Act_Phone                              Act_Title          Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36849




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36852               1 CGS/P. Dennett                Update documents                               6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36863               1 CGS                           Update documentation to match this approach    6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36865




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36870




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36872




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36873               1 CGS/P. Dennett                Update documentation                           6/1/2005 Open
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                             Initiator                      Mail_Code           Init_Phone   Init_Fax                                RID_Title                                    Doc_No            Paragraph_Page                                         Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        29 Henry Hoang/Boeing PEI                 henry.hoang2@boeing.com            281-226-6054                ACOP Compatibility with EXPRESS Rack Interface                    ACP-SP-CGS-001         2.1 & 5.3.1.1               2.1 Applicable Documents Comments: SSP 30238 and 30237 need
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              to be included in the “Applicable Documents”. Consequences:
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              ACOP will not compatible with EXPRESS Rack interface and Space
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Station. 5.3.1.1 Power Interface 1. Comments: Electromagnetic
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Interference (EMI) and Electrostatic Discharge (ESD) are not
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              addressed in section 5.3.1 “Electrical Interfaces” of this document.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Suggestion: Add section 7.0 of SSP 52000-IDD-ERP to paragraph
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              5.3.1.1 of this document. Consequences: ACOP will not compatible
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              with EXPRESS Rack interface. 2. Provide 28Vdc Interface Block
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Diagram between the ACOP and EXPRESS including the cable and
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              connector part numbers.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        30 Henry Hoang/Boeing PEI                 henry.hoang2@boeing.com            281-226-6054                Additional Info Needed for PIA                                    EXPRESS PIA for ACOP                               Provide the list of Applicable Documents and/or Reference
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              Documents Provide the list of ACOP responsibilities


AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        31 Henry Hoang/Boeing PEI                 henry.hoang2@boeing.com            281-226-6054                ACOP Internal Circuits Protection                                 ACP-TN-CGS-001         3.4.2.1 & Figure 3-13       ACOP utilizes “Circuit Breaker” as the protection for wiring and
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              downstream circuits from over-current situation. Refers to Paragraph
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              3.4.2.1 and Figure 3-13. This presents a concern regarding to trips
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              of the upstream SSPCM and potential to jeopardize mission
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              successful. The “Circuit Breaker” is take time to trip (in seconds or
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              minutes) due to the inertia device, and the over current condition can
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              result in damage to surrounding devices and trip the SSPCM (5-10
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              msec).




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        32 Norman Schmoeker/Boeing PEI            JJ-40/norm.schmoeker@boeing.com    256-961-2386                Crew Loads                                                        ACP-RP-CGS-005                                  7 Crew loads on front panel of locker/payload not addressed.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        33 Norman Schmoeker/Boeing PEI            JJ-40/norm.schmoeker@boeing.com    256-961-2386                Payload C. G.                                                     ACP-RP-CGS-005                                 6.7 The c.g. of the payload is not defined in the mass table. The
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              allowable mass varies depending on the c.g. of the payload.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        34 Norman Schoeker/Boeing PEI             JJ-40/norm.schmoeler@boeing.com    256-961-2386                Depress/Repress Loads                                             ACP-RP-CGS-005                                  7 MPLM/Middeck/USLAB Depress/Repress load cases not
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             addressed.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        35 Ashesh Patel/Boeing-IPIC-PEI           ashesh.g.patel@boeing.com          256-961-0311                Need fan inside the payload for internal air circulation of AAA   ACP-RP-CGS-006                                     ACOP analysis assumed receiving AAA conditioned air through
                                                                                                                                                                                         conditioned air.                                                                                                     ducted ports at the back of the ACOP plate. ACOP does not have a
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              fan. EXPRESS rack AAA is not ducted to the backplate of the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              locker/payload. Payload needs it´s own fan to pull conditioned air
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              provided by AAA.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        36 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                SSP 52050 Reference                                               ACP-RP-CGS-003                                 2.1 Applicable documents lists an outdated version of SSP 52050.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        37 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                HRDL Minimum Packet Size                                          ACP-RP-CGS-003         5.3.2                       The document states that ´´Transmitter capable to transmit frame
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              from 1 to 4096 bytes length.´´ While this may be true, the HRDL
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              CCSDS packet size requirement (SSP 52050 {3.4.2.4.1.2-A}) is that
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              packets will be from 100 and 4096 bytes length (inclusive). This
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              requirement should be noted to prevent any confusion regarding
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              actual HRDL packet size requirement. (This statement also appears
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              in ACP-SQ-CGS-001, paragraph 2.6.4.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        38 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                Minimum Ku-band Packet Length                                     ACP-SP-CGS-001         Table 6-3                   The table defines the minimum packet length (PacketLen) for frames
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              transmitted by AMS as 0 bytes. For Ku-band packets the minimum
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              packet length is 93 bytes. (See SSP 41158 Table 4.1.1.1-1.
                           Recommend                                                    Team_Member                                             Resolution                                             RID_Category   Child   Parent   Take_Board            Disposition         Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature   Sign_Date    Intiator_Dispo
See comments above                                                  Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   SSP 30238 and 30237 are called out by SSP 52000-IDD-ERP, so          Documentation                                 No           Approved with Modification                    Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 Yes
                                                                                                                    they do not have to be specifically called out by the ACOP team
                                                                                                                    Section 5.3.1.1 will be updated as recommended.




See comments above                                                  Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   This will be done and was already planned work. PIM will discuss     Documentation                                 No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                                    with Henry Hoang to ensure that responsibilities list is complete.


See comments above. Impact if recommendation not implemented: Team 1 - Avionics                                     This is not a requirement in SSP-52000, but ACOP team will take      Design Info                                   No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
ACOP needs to protect itself.                                                                                       this information into account with our design.




Include crew loads per SSP 52000-IDD-ERP, para. 4.5.1, Table 4-     Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   This work was anticipated and will be included in future work.       Action in Work                                No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 Yes
VII Impact if recommendation not implemented: Front panel/LCD
could break and harm crew.

Include c.g. data per SSP 52000-IDD-ERP, para. 4.4.1, Table 4-VIA Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation     This data will be provided by CDR.                                   Design Info                                   No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
Impact if recommendation not implemented: Payload may exceed
mass and c.g. requirements causing possible failure during launch or
landing.

Include depress/repress loads/analysis per SSP 52000-IDD-ERP,       Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   Work was planned and will be completed by CDR.                       Action in Work                                No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
para. 4.8. Impact if recommendation not implemented: Payload
structure may fail during depress/repress load conditions.


Include fan in the design for internal air circulation. Impact if   Team 3 - Thermal                                Fan has been implemented.                                            Possible Technical Broke        24            No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
recommendation not implemented: AAA conditioned air will not be
be useful for cooling ACOP payload.




Replace reference to SSP 52050 Rev D with SSP 52050 Rev E           Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   Update references                                                    Documentation                                 No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
(November 12, 2002). (Also needs to be updated in ACP-SP-CGS-
001 & ACP-SQ-CGS-001.) Impact if recommendation not
implemented: ACOP will be designed to out of date requirements.



Note the actual HRDL packet size requirement. Impact if             Team 1 - Avionics                               Add comment to document that states HRDL packet size limit           Documentation                                 No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
recommendation not implemented: Possible confusion regarding
HRDL packet size requirement.




Change the minimum packet length to 93 bytes. Impact if             Team 1 - Avionics                               Implement recommendation                                             Documentation                                 No           Approved                                      Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005         3/10/2005
recommendation not implemented: Incorrectly sized Ku-band
packets.
Init_Dispo_Date             RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No            Actionee   Act_Phone                           Act_Title   Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36874               1 CGS                           Update documents as recommended      6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36875



       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36955




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36956



       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36957




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36958




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                     3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36959




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36960               1 CGS/ASI                       Update documents                     6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36961               1 P. Dennett                    Update document                      6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36962               1 P. Dennett                    Update document                      6/1/2005 Open
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                             Initiator                      Mail_Code           Init_Phone      Init_Fax                                 RID_Title                    Doc_No       Paragraph_Page                                 Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        39 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   Secondary CCSDS Header Requirements for Telemetry   ACP-SP-CGS-001   Table 6-4           The table, in the PacketID2 row, contains a note that ´´Per
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     SSP57002C this is Data Cycle Counter´´. Since AMS telemetry will
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     not be processed by the HOSC, there is no requirement for AMS to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     implement a Data Cycle Counter in the Secondary Header. (See
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     SSP 52050 Appendix D, paragraph E.)



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        40 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   ER3 APIDs                                           ACP-SP-CGS-001   6.3.2               The APIDs listed for ACOP in ER3 are incorrect (except for the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     MCC-H to ACOP in ER3 APID, which is correct). This is actually my
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     fault, as an email I sent to Peter Dennett with assigned APID
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     numbers contained cut and paste errors for the ER3 (LAB1P4)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     locations.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        40 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   ER3 APIDs                                           ACP-SP-CGS-001   6.3.2               The APIDs listed for ACOP in ER3 are incorrect (except for the
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     MCC-H to ACOP in ER3 APID, which is correct). This is actually my
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     fault, as an email I sent to Peter Dennett with assigned APID
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     numbers contained cut and paste errors for the ER3 (LAB1P4)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     locations.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        41 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   ISS Program Assigned APIDs                          ACP-SP-CGS-001   6.3.2               The document states ´´The ISS program has assigned the following
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     values to AMS-02: APIDs: 974-983.´´ These values were originally
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     assigned to AMS by PSI, but conflict with the desired AMS usage as
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     documented in Table 6-6. PSI will update ISS program
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     documentation (D684-11372-01) to agree with Table 6-6.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        42 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   Incorrect Requirement Trace for SRD-3.1.13-060      ACP-SQ-CGS-001   3.1.1.3             The requirements trace for SRD-3.1.13-060 incorrectly references
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     ACP-SP-CGS-001 section 6.3.3.3.9.1. The correct reference should
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     be to section 6.3.3.9.1.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        43 Joseph T. Breit/IPIC PSI               HB3-40/joseph.t.breit@boeing.com   281-226-4435                   No Traceability to ISS Requirements                 ACP-SQ-CGS-001   3&4                 The SW Requirement Document provides no traceability to ISS
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     requirements.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        44 Mike Capell/AMS                        michael.capell@cern.ch             +41 (22) 767 4706              Data Connectors                                     ACP-RP-CGS-003                       One data connector is proposed to contain two network connections.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     This is an no-standard pin-out.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        45 Mike Capell                            michael.capell@cern.ch             +41 (22) 767 4706              HRDL Connector                                      ACP-RP-CGS-003                       ACOP front panel HRDL connector is proposed to contain 2 Tx and
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     1 Rx fibers. This requires a Y cable which is unnecessarily
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     complicated.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        46 Mike Capell/AMS                        michael.capell@cern.ch             +41 (22) 767 4706              Spare Slot in Thermal Model                         ACP-RP-CGS-003                       In the ACOP thermal model the spare slot is allocated 0 W.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        47 Mike Capell/AMS                        michael.capell@cern.ch             +41 (22) 767 4706              USB Port Location                                   ACP-RP-CGS-003                       USB port is located on board front panel.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        48 Stanford/NT3                           john.stanford1@nasa.gov            x31347                         Face Plate Connector Protection                     NA                                   Determine what loads(bump, kick, incidential) unprotected
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     connectors will sustain (power, data and fiber optics).




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        48 Stanford/NT3                           john.stanford1@nasa.gov            x31347                         Face Plate Connector Protection                     NA                                   Determine what loads(bump, kick, incidential) unprotected
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     connectors will sustain (power, data and fiber optics).




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        49 Stanford/NT3                           john.stanford1@nasa.gov            x31347                         Face Plate Connector Protection                     NA                                   Detremine what loads(bump, kick, incidential) unprotected
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     connectors will sustain (power, data and fiber optics).
                           Recommend                                                        Team_Member                                           Resolution                                              RID_Category             Child   Parent   Take_Board            Disposition                             Dispo_Comments    Dispo_By      Signature   Sign_Date    Intiator_Dispo
Remove the note. Impact if recommendation not implemented:            Team 1 - Avionics                               Thanks                                                                Design Info                                             No           Disapproved                                                       Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
Possible confusion over CCSDS Header requirements.




The correct APIDs are: 121 - POIC to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 221 - Team 1 - Avionics                                     Thanks, please update your list.                                      Documentation                                           No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
PCS/P1 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 321 - PCS/P2 to ACOP in ER3
(LAB1P4) 421 - PCS/P3 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 521 - PCS/P4 to
ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 621 - PCS/P5 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4)
Impact if recommendation not implemented: Improperly routed
commands.



The correct APIDs are: 121 - POIC to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 221 - Team 1 - Avionics                                     Thanks, please update your list.                                      Documentation                                           No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
PCS/P1 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 321 - PCS/P2 to ACOP in ER3
(LAB1P4) 421 - PCS/P3 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 521 - PCS/P4 to
ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4) 621 - PCS/P5 to ACOP in ER3 (LAB1P4)
Impact if recommendation not implemented: Improperly routed
commands.



Remove the statement in quotes above. Impact if recommendation        Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation                                                                         Documentation                             40            No           Approved                     Recommend closing to item 40.        Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
not implemented: Confusion over which Ku-band APIDs have been
assigned to AMS & ACOP.




Correct the reference. Impact if recommendation not implemented:      Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation   Will update                                                           Editorial                                               No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
Broken requirements traceability.


Update sections 3 & 4 to provide traceability from AMS/ACOP        Team 2 - Program Management and Documentation      Update as recommended and develop a Software Verification Plan        Documentation                                           No           Approved with Modification                                        Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005
project requirements to ISS requirements. Impact if recommendation                                                    based on SSP-52000-PVP and SSP-52050 (for HRDL only).
not implemented: Impossible to assess AMS/ACOP understanding
of ISS interface requirements.



Implement a second data connector containing just the second data Team 1 - Avionics, 4 - Mechanical                   We will attempt to implement based on front panel space and HFIT      Design Info                                             No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
connection. Impact if recommendation is not implemented:                                                              considerations.
Government supplied data cable cannot be used with second
network.

Implement 2 HRDL connectors. Impact if recommendation is not          Team 4 - Mechanical                             The front panel space is limited and junction will be made near by.   Design Info                                             No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
implemented: Any change in HDRL connections within US lab will
result in suboptimal cabling.

Nominal power allocation for spare slot, e.g. 5 W. Impact if          Team 4 - Thermal                                We agree, the thermal model will be updated.                          Clarification of Program Requirement                    No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
recommendation is not implemented: May not be able to use spare
slot in the future.

USB port should be located on ACOP front panel. Impact if             Team 4 - Mechanical                             This is acceptable as long as we can find room on the front panel.    Clarification of Program Requirement                    No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
recommendation is not implemented: Use of WSB port will require
mulitple power cycles of ACOP to install and uninstall. Size of USB
device is restricted.

Determine current loads for standard ISS connectors. Perform          4 - Mechanical                                  PE&I should provide the requirement for the generic power and data Design Info                                                No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
analysis for fiber optics.                                                                                            connectors for kick loads. ACOP team will determine the best way to
                                                                                                                      apply these loads to the fiber connector.


Determine current loads for standard ISS connectors. Perform          4 - Mechanical                                  PE&I should provide the requirement for the generic power and data Design Info                                                No           Approved                                                          Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
analysis for fiber optics.                                                                                            connectors for kick loads. ACOP team will determine the best way to
                                                                                                                      apply these loads to the fiber connector.


Determine current loads for standard ISS connectors. Perform                                                                                                                                                                                                     Withdrawn                    Accidently duplicated RID 48         Board Chair   T. Martin     3/10/2005 yes
analysis for fiber optics.
Init_Dispo_Date              RID_Status           Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No                Actionee   Act_Phone                                Act_Title                           Act_Due   Act_Status
                  Open                                                                                                        36963




                  Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36964               2 P. Dennett                        Obtain Boeing document of APIDs                                  3/20/2005 Open




                  Closure Pending Documentation                                                                               36964               1 J. Breit                          Update documentation                                             4/15/2005 Open




                  Open                                                                                                        36965




       3/10/2005 Closure Pending Documentation                                                                                36966               1 CGS                               Update document                                                   6/1/2005 Open



                  Open                                                                                                        36967




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                      3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36990




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                                                                       36991



       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                         36992               1 CSIST/CGS                         Update model and documentation for future work                    6/1/2005 Open



       3/10/2005 Closed                                                      3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    36993




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                         37001               2 CGS                               Determine best way to apply kick loads for fiber connector and    6/1/2005 Open
                                                                                                                                                                                      complete analysis




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                                         37001               1 Norman Schmoeker                  Provide kick loads for standard connectors                       3/17/2005 Closed




       3/10/2005 Closed                                                      3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    37002
Project   Review_Type   Review_Date     ReviewID    CutOffDate    Rev_ID   RID_No                     Initiator                       Mail_Code       Init_Phone         Init_Fax                                RID_Title             Doc_No              Paragraph_Page                                  Problem
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        50 Stanford/NT3                   NT3                                            31347              Protection for Fiber Optic Cable         N/A                                            1. Define the length (or approximate length) of the fiber optic cable.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2. Determine what protection should be provided for the fiber optic
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            cable, including special provisions, and procedures. 3. Determine
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            special safety precautions. 4. Determine additional weight
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            requirements (weight of protection material) based on protection
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            strategies.


AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        50 Stanford/NT3                   NT3                                            31347              Protection for Fiber Optic Cable         N/A                                            1. Define the length (or approximate length) of the fiber optic cable.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            2. Determine what protection should be provided for the fiber optic
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            cable, including special provisions, and procedures. 3. Determine
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            special safety precautions. 4. Determine additional weight
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            requirements (weight of protection material) based on protection
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            strategies.


AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        51 Trent Martin                   EA2                             281-483-3296                      Fail Safe Analysis                       Structural Docs             N/A                ACOP Team should coordinate with STS SWG or MSWG to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            determine if fail safe analysis must be performed on the 4 bolt
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            interface when mounted in a rack for launch.


AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        52 Trent Martin                   EA2                                    2814833296                 Load Factors                             Structures                  N/A                Load factors should have included 64 cases. It appears that only 40
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            have been assessed.
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        53 Trent Martin                   EA2                                    2814833296                 Factors of Safety                        Structures                  N/A                ACOP team should coordinate with STS SWG and Boeing to ensure
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            that verification by analysis with FoSY=1.25 and FoSU=2.0 (as
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            specified in SSP-52000-IDD-EPR, Table 4-IIC and 4-IIA) is
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            acceptable.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        54 Leland Hill/ESCG               leland.hill@escg.jacobs.com     281-461-5710                      Correction of Applicable Documents       Various                                        ACOP PDR documentation refenrences an out of date document for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            the control of stress corrosion cracking. MSFC-SPEC-522B is used,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            this document has been replaced by MSFC-STD-3029, ´´Guidelines
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            or the Selection of Metallic Materials for Stress Corrosion Cracking
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Resistance in Sodium Chloride Environments´´.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        54 Leland Hill/ESCG               leland.hill@escg.jacobs.com     281-461-5710                      Correction of Applicable Documents       Various                                        ACOP PDR documentation refenrences an out of date document for
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            the control of stress corrosion cracking. MSFC-SPEC-522B is used,
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            this document has been replaced by MSFC-STD-3029, ´´Guidelines
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            or the Selection of Metallic Materials for Stress Corrosion Cracking
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Resistance in Sodium Chloride Environments´´.



AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        55 Carl Bohannon                  Beoing PE&I                     281-226-4480                      Thermal Issues                           Thermal                     N/A                1) Does the maximum chassis temp account for the delta between
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            the chassis and the maximum elecronic component junction temp. 2)
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            SSP 52000 lists debris in the AAA. Does ACOP have a filter. 3) As a
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            management procedure, it is a good idea to calculate heat leak to
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            cabin air early. That way you will have time to calculate a more
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            realistic front panel temperature if your heat leak is too high. Also
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            heatleak to the cabin air is a more limited resource that water
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            cooling (AAA dumps heat directly to the water loop). So, if your
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            cabin air heat leak is unrealistically high your operation may be
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            limited by resources. 4) This is an excellent and detailed analysis.




AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        56 Tim Urban/ESCG                 timothy.urban@escg.jacobs.com   281-461-5702                      EMC Acceptance Testing                   Varification Presentation                      The presentation states that EMC Acceptance Testing for FMs be
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            emissions only and TO BE CONFIRMED.
AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        57 S. Porter                      EA1                             281-483-7149                      Cabling for ACOP                         Avionics Presentation                          Power and Data cables for ACOP to be supplied by NASA as GFE?
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Need answer soon, and need to know if equivalent training models
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            will be supplied. Need to determine number that should be provided
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            by customer.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        57 S. Porter                      EA1                             281-483-7149                      Cabling for ACOP                         Avionics Presentation                          Power and Data cables for ACOP to be supplied by NASA as GFE?
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Need answer soon, and need to know if equivalent training models
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            will be supplied. Need to determine number that should be provided
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            by customer.

AMS_02 ACOP_PDR              3/9/2005         235     3/11/2005      235        57 S. Porter                      EA1                             281-483-7149                      Cabling for ACOP                         Avionics Presentation                          Power and Data cables for ACOP to be supplied by NASA as GFE?
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            Need answer soon, and need to know if equivalent training models
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            will be supplied. Need to determine number that should be provided
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            by customer.
                            Recommend                                                 Team_Member                                Resolution                                               RID_Category            Child   Parent   Take_Board           Disposition                       Dispo_Comments                    Dispo_By      Signature     Sign_Date   Intiator_Dispo
Open for discussion.                                                 4 Mechanics                    We agree that there is a potential issue. OZ will help us to define the Design Info                                            No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    length. Protection issue must be taken to safety panel.




Open for discussion.                                                 4 Mechanics                    We agree that there is a potential issue. OZ will help us to define the Design Info                                            No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    length. Protection issue must be taken to safety panel.




Coordinate the issue.                                                4 - Mechanical                 Fail safe analysis will be completed on all bolts for CDR. However,    Possible Technical Broke                                No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    there may be an issue associated with these bolts since they have
                                                                                                    been considered a mechanism in the past.


Perform additional analyses.                                         Trent Martin                   Withdraw                                                               Possible Technical Broke                                No           Withdrawn             Reviewed approach, and the load cases are correct.   Board Chair   Trent Martin    3/10/2005 Yes


Coordinate with SWG and Boeing.                                      4 - Mechanics                  Will coordinate                                                        Clarification of Program Requirement                    No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes




Change all refernces of MSFC-SPEC-522B to MSFC-STD-3029.             4- Mechanics                   Update the document.                                                   Documentation                                           No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
Impact if recommendation not implemented: Possible non-
compliance with updated standards.




Change all refernces of MSFC-SPEC-522B to MSFC-STD-3029.             4- Mechanics                   Update the document.                                                   Documentation                                           No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
Impact if recommendation not implemented: Possible non-
compliance with updated standards.




1) Answer is yes, so document. 2) Answer is yes, both at inlet and   3 Thermal                      Thanks for the info.                                                   Design Info                                             No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
outlet.




Urban will work with EV4 to confirm this.                            1-Avionics                     OK                                                                     Clarification of Program Requirement                    No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes


Define supplier.                                                     2-Program Mgmt                 All flight power and data cables will be provided. They will be in  Clarification of Program Requirement                       No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    place based on the topology at the time. In addition, NASA will
                                                                                                    provide the front panel connector as well. All ground hardware must
                                                                                                    be provided by ACOP team.

Define supplier.                                                     2-Program Mgmt                 All flight power and data cables will be provided. They will be in  Clarification of Program Requirement                       No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    place based on the topology at the time. In addition, NASA will
                                                                                                    provide the front panel connector as well. All ground hardware must
                                                                                                    be provided by ACOP team.

Define supplier.                                                     2-Program Mgmt                 All flight power and data cables will be provided. They will be in  Clarification of Program Requirement                       No           Approved                                                                   Board Chair   T. Martin       3/10/2005 yes
                                                                                                    place based on the topology at the time. In addition, NASA will
                                                                                                    provide the front panel connector as well. All ground hardware must
                                                                                                    be provided by ACOP team.
Init_Dispo_Date           RID_Status   Closure_Comments   Closure_Forward     Closure_Concur     Closure_Date     RID_ID   Action_No             Actionee       Act_Phone                                Act_Title                            Act_Due   Act_Status
       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37004               1 APO                                Coordinate with OZ and safety panel regarding routing and          6/1/2005 Open
                                                                                                                                                                            protection for cables




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37004               2 PE&I - Vergel Romero               Determine location and routing of cables.                         4/15/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37009               1 APO-Chris Tutt                     Determine with MSWG if there is a concern                         3/31/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                           3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    37010


       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37011               1 APO - Chris Tutt                   Coordinate with SWG                                               4/15/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37012               1 CGS                                Update document                                                    6/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37012               2 APO - Leland Hill                  Provide new specification                                         3/17/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Closed                                           3/10/2005          3/10/2005        3/10/2005    37013




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37014               1 APO Tim Urban                      Coordinate                                                        4/15/2005 Open


       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37015               1 OZ - Win Reid                      Provide all drawings necessary to develop ground hardware for     4/15/2005 Open
                                                                                                                                                                            necessary cables and connectors.




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37015               2 OZ - Win Reid                      Provide all cables and connectors required for flight hardware.    8/1/2005 Open




       3/10/2005 Open                                                                                              37015               3 P. Dennett                         Provide all necessary requests to Win.                            3/15/2005 Closed

								
To top