IPE-What is IPE
Document Sample


Linda Young
POLS 400
International Political Economy
Wilson Hall – Room 1122
What is IPE?
Fall 2005
Politics and Economics
Wallerstein: disciplines due to historical
developments – shape their methodology
Modernity defined by a division between
the market, the state, and civil society
– Political Science, Sociology and Economics
– Spheres dominated by laws deduced by
empirical analysis – different from history
Immanuel Wallerstein
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
History of the Term
Adam Smith: PE was a branch of the
science of a legislator or statesman…
John Stuart Mill: the science of how
nations get rich
Alfred Marshall: used economics not
political economy – denied importance of
politics
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Questions generated by the interactions
of economic and political affairs (Gilpin)
The interaction of markets and powerful actors
Because an explanation from one viewpoint is narrow
1992 study of Japan and East and SE Asia
– Interdisciplinary
• Questions determined the answers
Japan
– Political Scientists
• Looked at trade/investment of Japanese firms – and
development assistance
• Concluded that Japan trying to create sphere of influence
• Pacific Asian economy as hierarchical
– Economists
• Trade flows and other measurable data
• Concluded events and patterns could be explained by the
market
• No evidence of Japan trying to create a sphere of influence
Differences
Political scientists: economy as having powerful economic
and state actors
Economists: defined the economy in terms of economic forces
– No conscious strategy on the part of states or multinational
corporations (MNCs)
– Explainable due to economic forces – investment due to
appreciation of the Yen
Differences reflected their assumptions
Can be complimentary
MNCs
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
International Political Economy
Susan Strange: IPE concerns the social,
political and economic arrangements affecting
the global systems of production, exchange
and distribution, and the mix of values reflected
therein. Those arrangements are not divinely
ordained, nor are they the outcome of blind chance.
Rather they are the result of human decisions taken in the
context of manmade institutions and sets of self-set rules
and customs.
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Definitions
States: political institutions of the modern nation state, a geographic
unit with a coherent and autonomous system of government
Institutions: debate between the economic and political perspective
– North: institutions result from intentional (and rational) actions by
actors to maximize their economic interests
– Political science places more emphasis on irrational, political (including
power relationships) and historical factors shaping institutions
Markets: economic institutions of modern capitalism – a force that
motives human behavior – to produce and supply goods or to seek
out goods and jobs
Society embeds both the State and the Market
Tension between the State and the Market
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Tension between the State and the Market
Example is the film and news industry
States want control over entry – political motivations
Market wants to export US movies for example
Problem for some countries
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Political Science
Distribution of gains from exchange
– Between actors in an economy
– Between states
States, MNCs and powerful actors intervene to
shape the nature of international regimes
– Design and functioning of institutions
– To advance their political and economic
interests
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Economics
Concerned with efficiency
– Who considers income inequality to be a problem?
Gains of mutual exchange
Regard markets as self-regulating and immune from
politics
Unconcerned with institutions
Economics assumes that exchange occurs because it
benefits all parties
– Distributional effects (welfare analysis)
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Economists Disagree
Over the relative importance of market failure and government
failure
Market failure: when imperfections in the market mean
that the market will not deliver its promise (its theoretical
beneficial results)
– Justification for government intervention
Government failure: some economists studying
institutions take a view that public officials are not
disinterested – serve their own interests – public choice
– Justification for limiting government
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
What's More Important?
Positive gains or relative gains?
Grieco: states care about relative gains
Cooperation more likely if positive gains are
enough
Examples? Trade negotiations Joseph Grieco
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Sovereignty and Interdependence
States want both – they conflict
Gilpin says “the logic of the market is to put
more and more aspects of society into the
price mechanism”
– Examples: social security, water
Trade rules: how do they increasingly Robert Gilpin
impinge on national autonomy?
– Biotechnology
– WTP dispute settlement
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
States and Markets
States: want to control economic activity (and accumulation of
capital) and its gains for their own ends
Market: locate activities where profitable
World systems analysis: state developed and used to facilitate
market transactions in the capitalist world economy
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Political Economy
Assumes the market is embedded in a larger framework
– Market structured by social and political environment
• What is the purpose of economic activity – to benefit
individual consumers, or to promote certain goals of
social welfare, or to maximize the power of the state?
(example?)
– Neoclassical economists assert that the purpose of
economic activity is to satisfy consumer’s desires, BUT
– Applies to the US more than to Japan and Asia
• Priority on social cohesion
• Prevalence of welfare state in France
Dani Rodrik’s evaluation is that successful
states innovate with economic and social
policy in unexpected ways
– Diversity needs to be preserved
Dani Rodrik
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Dimensions of International Political Economy
Some think of IPE as the study of multidimensional bargains
between powerful actors and states (bargains can take the
form of agreements, rules, conventions)
Levels of analysis: individual, state and international
Global structures (such as the rules governing
international trade, and international finance)
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Dimensions of International Political Economy
con’t
Perspectives and Values:
– Filters through which we interpret the world
– Mercantilism: economic nationalism – rooted in political
realism (like Gilpin) which evaluates IPE issues in terms
of the national interest
– Liberalism: evaluates IPE interests largely through the
perspective of the individual, and an emphasis on free
markets – associated with the study of economics
– Structuralism: rooted in Marxism, and evaluates the
world economy as a capitalist one with classes of nations
and people within nations – society structured by
dominant economic forces
Linda Young, POLS 400, International Political Economy
Get documents about "