Percentage of Revenue Contract
W
Description
Percentage of Revenue Contract document sample
Document Sample


Long-term Construction Projects
US GAAP
Two Alternate Accounting Method Available:
Per ARB #45 (1955)
Percentage of Completion Method
Completed Contract Method
Per AICPA Statement of Position No. 81-1 (1981)
Recommends the use of percentage of completion when the
following conditions are met. (Otherwise use completed contract.)
1. Reasonably dependable estimated can be made
2. Contract specifies legally enforceable rights, the
consideration, and the terms of settlement
3. Buyer is expected to satisfy obligations under contract
4. Contractor is expected to fulfill contractual obligations
On the surface, appears to contradict revenue recognition
principles. However, percentage of completion is not an exception
because of the special nature of the transaction
-- a "continuous sale"
1. Buyer and seller obtain enforceable rights
2. Buyer usually makes progress payments to support its
ownership investment
3. Buyer has a right to take over work-in-progress
7dcc3e11-8071-42c4-9b7b-5dd08fece692.doc created by T. Gordon 06/30/11 Page 1
PERCENTAGE OF COMPLETION:
1. Input measures:
Cost to Cost: costs-to-date divided by estimated total cost
Efforts expended: DL hours, etc., to-date divided by estimated
total DL hours
2. Output measures: (better but more difficult to obtain)
Example: miles completed to total miles contracted
TERMINOLOGY
Inventory account -- Construction In Progress
Accumulates all costs incurred on project plus any recognized
profit or loss
Liability account -- Progress Billings (or Partial Billings or
Construction Billings)
Accumulates total amounts billed to customer
These two accounts are treated as a "pair" for external
reporting:
If CIP > PB, report as current asset with title:
"Cost of Uncompleted Contracts in Excess of Related Billings"
If PB > CIP, report as current liability with title:
"Billings of Uncompleted Contracts in Excess of Related Costs"
7dcc3e11-8071-42c4-9b7b-5dd08fece692.doc created by T. Gordon 06/30/11 Page 2
LOSSES ON LT CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS
Special provision applies to both methods:
If a loss is estimated for the entire project, the TOTAL estimated
loss (not a percentage of that loss) must be reported in the year in
which it becomes apparent that a loss will be incurred.
Possible account title: "Provision for Loss on Contract" which
is offset against Construction in Progress
Percentage of completion Completed contract
Current period loss on Change in accounting No loss is recognized
ultimately profitable estimate – do not restate
contract previously issued financial
statements.
Adjustment affects current
period only
Adjustment makes
cumulative reported gain
equal to percentage of
completion times total
estimated gain
Loss on entire contract Recognize estimated loss Recognize estimated loss
in the period it first in the period it first
becomes evident. becomes evident.
Reverse out profits Record loss on income
previously recognized statement and reduce CIP
account
Consequently, current year
loss may be larger than
total estimated loss
7dcc3e11-8071-42c4-9b7b-5dd08fece692.doc created by T. Gordon 06/30/11 Page 3
Long-term Construction Accounting
IFRS vs US GAAP
US GAAP IFRS – IAS 11
Accounting methods Choice between: Completed contract is NOT
acceptable Percentage of acceptable.
completion
Completed contract Use percentage of
completion method
There are some criteria
provided but they are not If no reasonable estimates
mandatory of percentage of completion
can be made, use the Zero
profit method and switch
to percentage of completion
later
Comparing results: Percentage of completion Percentage of completion
Percentage of completion Would be same as IFRS Would be same as US
with respect to balance GAAP with respect to
sheet and income balance sheet and income
statement statement
Comparing results: Balance sheet = same Balance sheet = same
Completed contract vs.
zero profit method Income statement: Income statement:
Report zero revenue and Report revenue equal to
zero cost (until year costs incurred which results
completed) in zero profit.
Losses on contracts Always recognize 100% of Always recognize 100% of
loss as soon as it becomes loss as soon as it becomes
apparent apparent
Some tentative conclusions:
Percentage of completion approach is essentially the same – the difference is that it is a
choice under US GAAP and required under IFRS.
The completed contract and zero profit method have basically the same result (no profit
recognized) UNLESS estimates become possible later and IFRS would then begin using
the percentage of completion method to recognize revenues.
Likewise, we would not recognize a percentage of a loss under either US GAAP or IFRS
– instead, we’d recognize the full amount of the loss on a contract (perhaps with
discounted cash flows under IFRS).
7dcc3e11-8071-42c4-9b7b-5dd08fece692.doc created by T. Gordon 06/30/11 Page 4
Get documents about "