Learning Management System Benefits - PowerPoint
W
Description
Learning Management System Benefits document sample
Document Sample


Staff Performance
Management System
Roger Barker
Office of Human Resources
Staff Performance Management
System
An imperfect tool for an imperfect world:
Subjective
Biased
Merit pool too small to be meaningful
Stressful for all parties involved
2
Learning Objectives
Why have a Staff Performance
Management System?
Who benefits from a SPMS?
What does a good SPMS system look
like?
SPMS Administration
3
What Do We Know?
Performance appraisal is as important for
good performers as for weak ones. T or F
It is alright to give a mediocre performer a
good review, as long as you don’t give the
person a promotion. T or F
Performance evaluations are often the first
thing an opposing lawyer asks to see in a
wrongful discharge lawsuit. T or F
4
Why a Staff Performance
Management System
An important strategic management
tool
Sets performance accountabilities
Ties performance to compensation
and training needs
5
An Important Strategic Management
Tool for the Organization
Helpsorganization manage its human
resources
Develop talent pool
Ties performance to compensation
Identifies training needs
Individualaccountabilities enable
organization to meet its goals
6
Why Set Performance
Accountabilities
Provides objectivity in evaluating
performance
Employee knows what is expected of
them
Links performance to rewards and
opportunities
7
Setting Performance Accountabilities -
Learning Objectives
Know what constitutes a realistic,
measurable accountability
Know how to work together to establish
accountabilities
Know how to use mutually agreed-upon
accountabilities for development,
rewards, discipline and evaluation
8
Setting Performance
Accountabilities - Methods
Specific Criteria:
Job related, tied to unit objectives
Agreed upon
Prioritized
Written
Flexible
Observable, Measurable, Doable
9
What Do We Know?
It is best for supervisors to set performance
accountabilities for employees, since supervisors know
best what has to be accomplished. T or F?
Describing an accountability as “Type error-free reports
by the deadline dates” is better than saying “Type all
reports.” T or F?
Performance accountabilities should reflect the best
possible achievement under the best possible conditions.
T or F?
10
Tying individual accountabilities
to organizational goals
Goal 4 - Excellence in Capital, Fiscal and
Human Resources Planning and
Management
Goal 1 of OHR Unit Plan - “Develop and
distribute a monthly newsletter … human
resources information.”
11
Tying individual accountabilities
to Unit Plan
RB accountability - Improve internal and
external communications - Develop and
distribute a monthly newsletter to all faculty
and staff
SH accountability - Develop and supervise
the distribution of an OHR Newsletter.
PD accountability - Collect articles relevant
to compensation and benefits for inclusion
in OHR newsletter. 12
Documenting Performance -
Background
Good record-keeping insures
objectivity
Relevant to job accountabilities
Year-round process
First hand observations
13
Documenting Performance - Learning
Objectives
Know that objectivity requires
agreed-upon accountabilities
Know how to document negative and
positive activities
Know how to utilize process to seek
out and/or render assistance in
improving job performance 14
What Do We Know?
A good supervisor is able to keep mental
track of individual employees’ performance.
T or F
Performance documentation should reflect
the work performance and goals of
individual employees. T or F
15
Documenting Performance -
Documenting for Impact
Use same standards for all
employees with similar duties
Ensure records are timely,
accurate, behavioral,
consistent and complete
16
Documenting Performance
Document as situations happen
Maintain balance. Keep notes on ALL
employees
Keep notes job related and objective
Support observations with facts. Think
your opinion but don’t write it down
Avoid emotions
17
Documenting Performance
Avoid conclusions. Don’t say “Employee is
undependable.” Instead say, “Employee
was late by an average of 15 minutes per
day during week of September 15.”
Remember that others may read your
comments. Documentation is the best
shelter again litigation.
18
Administration - The Appraisal
Meeting
Employees can only improve and
contribute to unit goals if they
clearly understand what is expected
of them
All employees want to know:
How they are doing
How they measure up
What their prospects are 19
What Do We Know?
In a well executed consultation, employees have the
opportunity to give their opinions and ask questions. T
or F?
Performance appraisals should avoid praising even
excellent employees or they will start to slack off. T or
F?
A supervisor’s subjective opinions of an employee are as
important in performance appraisals as documented
performance. T or F?
20
Administration - The Appraisal
Meeting
At least 2 weeks before the meeting,
complete draft appraisal
Notify the employee at least 1 week
before consultation and set aside at least
1 hour in a private setting
Discuss appraisal with reviewer before
consultation
21
Administration - The Appraisal
Meeting
Open the meeting by stating its purpose
and format
Jointly review accountabilities
Give your unbiased appraisal of the
employee’s performance and progress
Expect disagreement - Promote 2-way
communication
22
Administration - The Appraisal
Meeting
Halo Effect: People are overrated
because:
We like them personally
They’re especially good at one aspect
of their job
They’ve been with the company a
long time
23
Administration - The Appraisal
Meeting
Horns Effect is when people are
underrated because of:
Their personal style
A particularly negative incident
Poor performance in one area of
their job
24
Other Common Appraisal Errors
Recency - Appraiser gives more weight to
recent events or behaviors
Bias - Appraiser’s values, beliefs, or
prejudices distort ratings
Deficiency - Appraiser leaves out important
aspects of job
Contamination - Appraised on items
unrelated to job performance
25
Promoting 2-way
Communication
Get rid of the word “but”
Giving feedback is a risk
Supervisors should assume employees want help
Employees should assume supervisors want to
help
Be certain you understand what is being said
Think now, act later
26
Giving Feedback
Describe the behavior; don’t judge it. If
appraiser is negative and accusatory,
employee is likely to be hostile and
defensive
Assume an attitude of helpfulness rather
than power and domination. Ask for
employee input into problem areas.
27
Giving Feedback
Empathize with employee. Instead of
saying “I don’t know what can be done
about this,” say “I can’t think of anything
right now, but I know a couple places I can
look for suggestions.”
28
Giving Feedback
Give specific examples of good and
substandard employee performance.
Instead of saying, “Sue, you are doing a
good job,” say “Sue, your numbers are up
10% over last year.”
29
Defining “Accountabilities”
and “Goals”
Accountabilities are those tasks, mutually
established by the employee and supervisor, that
the employee has agreed to accomplish
Generally taken from the job description
Goals, as they relate to this subject, are the
activities, tasks, or initiatives that the employee is
committing to accomplish during the upcoming
evaluation period.
30
The Appraisal Meeting -
Setting new goals
Setting Goals is the SMART thing to do:
Specific
Measurable
Attainable
Relevant
Time Specific 31
The Appraisal Meeting -
Closing the Meeting
Review the points made
Reassure employee you wish to help
Summarize the agreed-upon actions
Allow employees to challenge ratings they
feel are unfair by appealing to a higher
level of management
Ask employee to sign the appraisal form
32
Characteristics of a Good
Evaluation
It is based on evidence
It is highly individualized
It is a joint activity
It strives for understanding
33
Characteristics of a Good
Evaluation, Continued
It creates commitment
It maximizes self-analysis and
self-discovery
It results in improved
performance
34
You do not have to be an Einstein …
E=mc2
Employee Enthusiasm
Mission
Cash
Congratulations
35
System Administration
PG-50 Staff Performance
Management System
University Administrative
Regulation (UAR) 301.01
36
Why a Staff Performance
Management System
An Important Strategic
Management Tool
Sets Performance Accountabilities
Ties performance to compensation
and training needs
37
Related docs
Other docs by yju21121
REIT Management Research LLC Watertown MA Location Position Lease Analyst Pri
Views: 96 | Downloads: 1
Get documents about "