Docstoc

ETHICS

Document Sample
ETHICS Powered By Docstoc
					                   ETHICS
THE PROFESSION & ARCHITECTURE:
A philosophical consideration of risk and practice
            www.leonvanschaik.com
    Are we born moral?
        John Gray, NYRB May 10 2007pp 2628

   Moral Minds: How nature
Designed Our Universal Sense of
       Right and Wrong,
   by Marc D. Hauser, Ecco, 2007, NY
  Humans have an inborn moral
faculty, parts of which they share
       with other animals…
   This „deep moral grammar‟
   underpins all reasoning on
              ethics…
conscious principles of ethical
         argument

     Universalisability:
     application to all life forces
       (Kant)
conscious principles of ethical
         argument



     2       Humanity: ... who argues
     ethically and is ... physically intact can
     only at the expense of pragmatic self-
     contradiction deny that the physical
     integrity of (people) should be
     protected...
conscious principles of ethical
         argument
       3       Informed Consent: Nuremberg
       Code (Beauchamp/Walters 1978).
       Every case must be examined
       individually to find out whether
       principles from other regions can be
       transferred and are more generalisable
       (universal) than regionally held
       beliefs/customs etc. This irredeemably
       qualifies regionalism, tribalism etc
conscious principles of ethical
         argument

      4      Content: the material values of
      groups involved in an action must be
      examined: what seems absurd or
      alternative today may be
      commonsense tomorrow eg preserving
      the ecological balance as a value for
      car-makers thirty years ago.
    Second Order Cybernetics adds
     Generosity as a fifth principle

  The principle of generosity proposes that our
ethical positions must maximise the opening of
 options. This fifth test for an ethical statement
   asks: does it increase choice? A lifetime of
studying systems has lead Heinz von Vorster to
argue that ethical positions necessarily open up
   options, unethical ones close them down.
   Even though based on an evolved
capability, to use Ethics consciously, they
       must be an argued position
Singer P Practical Ethics Cambridge
University Press 1979:
"The notion of living according to ethical
standards is tied up with the notion of
defending the way one is living, of giving a
reason for it, of justifying it.”
McCaughey's corollary:
"the professional's responsibility to know is
not just intellectual; it has a moral content"
          Professional Ethics
-the codes, conventions and guide-lines
that control the patterns of life adopted by
members of a profession. McCaughey
argues that:

-"the fusing of three values in a profession
gains other people's respect:
1 the value placed upon systematic
  knowledge and the intellect
  - knowing
2 the value placed upon technical
  skill and trained capacity
  - doing
3 the value placed upon putting this
  conjoint knowledge and skill to
  work in the service of others
  - helping
  Goldilocks‟ ethical analysis:
• Its too big - architecture can solve
  everything and anything
• Its too small - architecture is a private
  game
• Its just right - architecture as spatial
  intelligence (I think).
           To know what?
Its too big:
If Architecture is the art of human shelter
- the widest definition -
then the improbable radicalism of the
profession becomes readily apparent:

the argument has to be that
Architecture must be for all…
           To know what?
Its too small:
If Architecture is Eisenman-like aesthetic
dexterity visible only to a cognoscenti,
- the narrowest definition -
then the impossible conservatism of the
profession becomes readily apparent:

the argument has to be that
Architecture must be for all…
              To know what ?
          Its just right:
The moral justification of our position as
            takes us justification of our a
architectsThe moralinexorably towards position
closer and restricted definition of
          as architects takes us inexorably
architecture, and hence towards a focus on
          towards a closer and restricted
architectural reality. As is argued in Zimmerli
          definition of architecture, and hence
          towards of a Non-Principle
W, The Principles a focus on architectural reality,
Orientated Ethics Paper RMIT 1989; there in
          on spatial intelligence. As is argued
are       Zimmerli W, The Principles of a Non-
          Principle a Problem Orientated
"Four Principles of Orientated Ethics, Paper,
Ethics" RMIT, 1989, ethics must be problem-
          orientated.
To do what? And for whom?
  Its too big: bottom up
  The principle of Universality requires of this position
  that architecture is about „Existenz-Minimum‟ (Meyer of
  Frankfurt) - a basic access to serviced shelter for every
  living creature is a universal moral necessity…

  Itss too big: top down

  Le Corbusier‟s CIAM coup in which architecture is put
  at the service of the state, any state…
                To help whom?
   Getting it „just right‟

   No one (Humanity), no being (All Life) can be denied
   the quality of shelter that I aspire to, or achieve

   This is a political crusade, not best pursued thro
   Architecture?
   Happiness Science-

Inequality is the prime cause of unhappiness
    Richard Layard (2005). Happiness: Lessons for a new science,Penguin,London
             To help how?
Politics must seek what architecture cannot seek:
Borderless service; borderless provision,
(an end to the apartheid that structures the world
      economy).
The principle of Informed Consent applies to us:
We are all party to the denial of quality shelter to the
      shanty-dwellers and the homeless
(i) in our society
(ii) in our trading partners' societies
(iii) on this globe
To help in what specific
       context?
Getting it just right:
Content (problem based ethics): Some (affordable)
quick fixes have unintended consequences:
•Asbestos sheeting makes shelter more
affordable…
•Nuclear power?
•Not recycling water?
•Not capturing stormwater…?
•etc
                  ?

Getting it just right: Generosity
flows through enchainments,
& that requires self knowledge.
 Getting it just right: Generosity
       versus exclusivity:
Ernest L. Boyer, Lee D. Mitgang, Building
Community: A new future for Architecture
Education and Practice, The Carnegie
Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching,
(1996) Princeton, versus
Architectural theory that is insular and isolated
from societal needs (as in Frampton) & the
abdication of architecture to elite and
commercial demands (as argued by Tafuri)
     To know what?
Understanding „just right‟ in
  architectural practice:
Dilemmas for Architecture

 An… important dilemma is that architecture
 provides services that are seemingly not
 vital to people's health and welfare in the
 same sense that the professional services
 of physicians, or even lawyers and dentists,
 are (Blau, LvS italics).
             To know what?
    De-Confusing the Knowledge
     Base: the basis for „just right‟
Many of these dilemmas result from the
fact that much of the building field is
controlled not by architects but by
engineers, developers, and building
contractors - at least in sheer numbers of
buildings (Blau)
3% of houses; 8-12% of housing, 80% of institutional
& commercial buildings (?), 20% of industrial (?),
how much of the landscape?
What is Architecture‟s exclusive knowledge base? Spatial thinking
 How can our architecture best
 pursue a „just right‟ role? Base
 it on the spatial intelligence of
             us all?

through (tri) polarities derived from ethical
argument:
 Rationalism, Contextualism,Tectonics,
Poetics, Civic Narrative Expression, The
New Sobriety, &…?
Exemplar: Melbourne Masters Architecture
TarraWarra Museum of Art 2004/5




   http://www.leonvanschaik.com/ethics.htm
   Getting it „just right‟ finding a
 continuum between the spatial
 intelligence of everyone and of
             architects:
“But the common denominator in achieving
architectural presence on a broader front is
community respect for the act of
architecture itself, not simply a procuration
process.”

Kerstin Thompson at launch of Design City Melbourne, April 28,
2006
  Towards a continuum:
Architecture as caretaker of
everyone‟s history in space
Our architectural engagement with spatial
intelligence is applied through dialogues with
society. Architecture suffers when it is simply
asserted as the will of a designer, or as the
logic of a canon, without accessing the spatial
intelligence of the community to be served.
Such assertions close down people‟s
engagements with architectural reality and
damage society‟s regard for Architecture as a
knowledge held in custody by experts.
 Spatial Intelligence as a knowledge
  base for a „just right‟ architectural
                 practice:
Universality: everyone has the capability of spatial
intelligence, what we do acknowledges that.
Humanity: architecture holds the accumulated spatial
knowledge of society in custody, and develops it
Informed Consent: the architecture that I do is in
conversation with that of the client community and of the
best of its kind on the globe
Content: making meaningful space
Generosity: acknowledge tri-polar debate as a tool for
building a continuum between specialist knowledge and
community mental space (in Piu)
      Is a continuum enough?
There is a fairly widely held view that not
enough building in Australia adds value to
the quality of life by transcending basic
need or developer economics.
More good architecture - it is posited - will
dissolve the nightmare created by
visualising a city in terms of its good
buildings alone... a city defined by a few
glimmers of torch-light amidst black holes.
There is a belief that the introduction of a
competition system will solve much of
this, and ensure the provision of quality
work at the same rate that it is provided in
some parts of continental Europe:
a rate that must outstrip mere building if
an architectural environment is to emerge.
There are simple calculus improbabilities
in this hope - we start too late, and too
slow; so do we, like Rossi, relegate
building to the humdrum and focus only
on monuments?
  Changing procurement methods?
To extend the penetration of architectural reality
in Australia we have to look for more than a
structural adjustment such as introducing a
short-listing, criterion based selection system,
such as that pioneered here at RMIT.
We face the longer task of creating an
intellectual context through which we achieve
respect for the profession of spatial intelligence,
a profession that creates architectural reality
appropriate to each place and to each
community.
        Creating a continuum
“It is to the extent that architecture is valued
in the community as a part of its intellectual
life that we must envy our northern
colleagues, for their value depends on this
general valuation - usually the result of
centuries of accretion.”
And the sense of an architectural continuum
depends on architectural values or reality
being held in high regard by entire
communities.
    The need for a continuum:
• When a parent throws a ball to a child, the
  entire sporting continuum opens up ahead of
  both, all the way to the finals and on to the
  Olympics, with every shade of possibility in
  between.
• When a parent chooses wallpaper or buys a
  lamp, we scorn the decorative impulse and
  close down the continuum of inhabiting
  space… thus isolating architecture and
  belittling the spatial intelligence of all…

Steen Eiler Rasmussen, Experiencing Architecture, Chapman &
   Hall Ltd. (1959) London
  But where does quality service arise?
The emphasis on corporate values over architectural values
denies the fact that (Blau):
Small and incompletely rationalised offices,
though handicapped by diseconomies of scale,
are the seedbed of ideas that produce high
quality work. And when they venture beyond the
limits of their scale and flaunt their
diseconomies, they do exceptionally good work.
The need is to bring small scale operators into
engagement with broad communal objectives
Architecture is inherently risk-taking:


"Daedalus is remembered as the first to venture to fly
(escaping from Minos with his son Icarus). What is
often forgotten is that Daedalus, in legend at least,
was also the first important architect, having designed
the extraordinary labyrinth and temple complex for his
patron, King Minos.” (Blau)
Icarus of course flew too high, the sun melted the wax
holding the feathers to his wings, and he plunged into
the sea and died.
Embracing the continuum is to
       embrace risk:
  "Ideas are found to play a role in change, and although it is a conditional role,
   they are instrumental just at the point of potential impasse, specifically in the

                     midst of structural contradictions...”(Blau)


     There are no predetermined
      outcomes. The piling up of
  contradictions is redolent with vast
     indeterminacy, which in turn
     creates the opportunities for
  experimentation and innovation ...
          in our chosen field
                   Embracing risk:



A variety of forms of risk structure are
inherent in architecture. These relate to the
dilemmas that confront contemporary
practitioners. Blau J Architects and Firms: a Sociological Perspective on
Architectural     Practice       The        MIT        Press        1987
  Risk Management?


  Architecture ... is governed by
     structures of risk that
 accompany opposing conditions
         of various sorts:
each embodying ethical dilemmas
            The dilemmas:
•the dependence on commissions (but cf. Katsalidis);
•a poor distinction between architecture and building,
(and thus among architects and engineers, developers,
contractors);
•the lack of congruence between those to whom the
architect is ethically responsible (for example the
residents of a housing project) and those to whom an
architect is accountable (the ... agency commissioning it)
•the constraints imposed on design practice by the
increasing size and complexity of architectural offices;
•the lag between plans and their fully realised built form;
•the lag between plans and their fully realised built form.
            Risk Avoidance
• Corporate structures for architecture seek to
  shift the risk to those who stand to benefit.
  Murphy Jahn, for example, do not design any
  details. They describe what they want, and
  approve shop drawings of details designed by
  the contractors, but on the basis of „the look‟
  alone.
• The architecture is only as good as the
  descriptions… & in my view is thinned down
  to a branded veneer.
 A Risk Embracing Ethics?
• Can a profession of rebels exist?
  knowing, doing, helping rebels?
• Or is „the profession‟ with its normative
  business ethics codes the wrong vehicle
  for research-led practice?
• Could a discourse-based ethics support
  research-led practice?
Paradox: success tends to normalisation ...
and risk avoidance. For architecture to survive,
another Daedalus risk cycle must ensue…
See Mastering Architecture
Components of such an ethics:
 Remembering cultural capital

“The rhetoric of today‟s political leaders
serves neither construction nor
conservation. Its aim is to dismantle.
Dismantle what has been inherited from
the past, socially, economically and
ethically, and in particular, all the
associations, regulations and
mechanisms expressing solidarity…”
John Berger, Wall and Bulldozer, 2006
   Components of such an ethics:
     Building public behaviours

“The End of History, which is the
Corporate global slogan, is not a
prophecy, but an order to wipe out the
past and what it has bequeathed
everywhere. The market requires every
consumer and employee to be massively
alone in the present…”
John Berger cont.
   Components of such an Ethics:
Growing local cultures of architecture (i)
    “Quaderns sets out to present the
architecture produced within our territorial
                 scope…
The market and propaganda creates and
  promotes solitary architects, rooted by
 nothing but their killer instinct, individual
    creators in need of a recognisable
   philosophy and style of their own the
 inspired authors of singular buildings…”
   Components of such an Ethics:
Growing local cultures of architecture (ii)

 “Quaderns seeks to counter this figure with
    that of an architect in whom ability and
    personal skill are the manifestation of a
  collective body of knowledge, learned and
   constituted over time, in which individual
  difference forms part of the characteristics
               of the community.”
              Editorial Q249 Spring 2006
        A tale of two cities (i)
In this city
•the schools are indifferent to speculative research through
design;
•the leaders of the profession sue their critics for damages;
•research is confined to building science or history;
•the intellectual life of architecture is circumscribed and
pilloried:
•the leaders resort unashamedly to insider trading and fee
fixing and place commercial values ahead of architectural
values in their definition of the real world.
Here there can be no ethical profession of architecture.
       A tale of two cities (ii)
In this city
•architects fight to ensure that at least one school will be
predominantly engaged in speculative, practice-based
research in the medium of architecture itself;
•criticism is enshrined in flurries of radical publications;
established architects engage in design research;
•clubs nurture debate;
•practice is informed by ideas;
•small practices have work
•there is engagement across the entire continuum.
Here there is a possibility of ethical architecture.
Thou shalt not live within thy means
Nor on plain water and raw greens.
If thou must choose
Between the chances, choose the odd:
Read the New Yorker, trust in God;
And take short views.


WH Auden, Under Which Lyre, College News, Bryn Mawr, 14 October 1943

				
DOCUMENT INFO