Phase I ESA
Document Sample


Phase I ESA
Environmental Site Assessment
Purpose
• The purpose of this phase I ESA is to provide
professional opinion on the potential
hazardous substances that are on site 140-
156 E. 14th st. (Parcel A)
Detailed Scope-of-Service
• Conducting a regulatory database search Of
known underground storage tanks and land
fills.
• Hazardous waste generation or treatment
• Storage and disposal facilities
• & Surface contamination.
Significant Assumptions
• There are no assumptions that apply to this
site.
Limitations and Exceptions
• No apparent limitations that would limit the
ability to complete the scope work.
Special Terms and Conditions
• There are no special terms and conditions
that apply.
User Reliance
• Reports shall not be relied upon by or
transferred to any other site.
• Phase I ESA report has been prepared for use
solely by COCH.
Location and Legal Description
• The property is located along the south and
the east of 14th st.
Subject Property and
Vicinity Characteristics
• Adjacent properties including residential
and commercial properties.
• Property was vacant at the time of site
reconnaissance.
Physical Settings
• The soil surface layer has black silty clay
loam.
• No wetlands were identified.
• Property was not located in flood zones
Descriptions of Structures, Roads,
and Other Improvements
• Vacant property
• With Grassland
• Paved sidewalks
Current Adjoining Property Uses
• Identify potential environmental concerns.
• Properties was were observed from the
boundaries and public right-a-ways
Title Records
• URS was not provided with title insurance
reports for the subject properties.
Environmental Liens
Use Limitations
• EDR was not able locate the property
• Environmental liens reports was not provided
to URS.
Specialized Knowledge
• No specialized knowledge beyond what was
discussed throughout the reports
• It was conveyed to URS during the
preparation of the report
Owner, Site Manager, and Occupant
Information
• Subject property was obtained in tax
reclaimation
Reason for Conducting
Phase I ESA
• The subject property is owned by COCH.
Other Information
• URS was provided with eligibility
determination for Brownfield assessment.
• Parcel A contained S&D Body Shop
Standard Environmental Records
• Subject was not listed in any database
searched by the EDR
Additional Environmental Records
• URS attempted to conduct file reviews at a
applicable state, municipal and county
offices.
Historical Use
• Developed since at least 1929
• Two square buildings on the northeast and
northwest
Aerial Photographs
• Due to poor quality structures were difficult
to disconcern
Topographic Maps
• Review maps of Calumet City and Harvey
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
• Sandborn maps were reviewed for the subject
property provided form the EDR
• Dated 1911, 1950 1966,1975
City Directories
• City directory search was only conducted for
the subject property address 284 E 14th
Street
Methodology and
Limiting Conditions
• Clear and 30 degrees Fahrenheit no
limitations
Interior and Exterior Observations
• Vacant and grassed at the time
• Mounds of garbage found at the site
Hazardous Substances and
Petroleum Products
• Not observed at the subject property
Underground/ Aboveground Storage
Tanks
• No evidence of UST’s or AST’s at the site
Drains and Sumps
• No drains or sumps were observed
• Storm water is managed by street flow or
surface infiltration.
• The site area surrounding roadways and the
municipal combined sewer system
Waste Water
• No process or sanitary waste water is
generated on site
• Storm water flows to Storm drains located
in the adjacent streets
Utilities
• As the subjects property is vacant, utilities
are not provided.
Wells
• No wells were observed or reported on or
adjacent to the subject property during
reconnaissance.
• Site contacts were not aware of wells at the
subject property.
Pits, Ponds, Lagoons
• No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on the
subject property during the property visit.
PCB-Containing and Hydraulic
Equipment
• Five pole mounted transformers at the site
• Owners not known
Other Physical
Evidence of Contamination
• No other physical evidence of contamination
was observed on the subject property during
URS site reconnaissance with the exception
of scattered debris that’s observed on the
subject property.
Conclusions
• The historical uses of are considered REC’s
• Parcel A
Environmental
Professionals Involved
• Stacy McCance
• Sarah Ruben
Get documents about "