Introduction Latin America and the Caribbean is an area of high agricultural and natural resource diversity, home to nearly 25 percent of the world’s forests and woodlands located in the region and 36 percent of the world’s main cultivated food and industrial species. The agriculture and natural resources industry plays an important role in the development of both rural and urban areas, and allows many people to supplement income and be economically active. Many agricultural research and outreach programs, performed by non- governmental organizations, U.S. and European universities, and governmental programs, strive to provide inputs and technologies to improve the productivity and efficacy of farmers in the region. A common form of research is conducted through participatory research programs, with the objective of satisfying a certain need or goal on-farm or within the community. The overall goal of participatory programs is to encourage the dissemination of information from the small participatory group to the entire population of a village or group. Unfortunately, the participatory research process is often dominated by the same problems already faced by farmers and ranchers—inequality in the selection of participants, failure to consider the concerns of all groups, and a lack of knowledge within the entire community. In order to attain optimal results from participatory research programs, researchers must find methods that address questions concerning access to information, receive equal input from all stakeholders, and ensure that results are disseminated across the entire community. Agriculture’s Scope Major agricultural exports of Latin America and the Caribbean include coffee (Brazil, Colombia, Central America), sugar (Central America and the Caribbean), bananas (Ecuador, Colombia, Honduras), wheat and corn (Argentina), fruits (Chile, Brazil, Argentina), and soybeans (Brazil). Farming systems employed in the region include at least 16 distinct systems, adapted to climate and environmental conditions across the region (figure 1) (FAO, 2001). Figure 1 Farming System Land area (% of Agricultural Population Principle Livelihoods Prevalence of region) (%) Poverty Irrigated 10 9 Horticulture, fruit, Low-moderate cattle Forest-based 30 9 Subsistence, cattle Low-moderate Costal Plantation 9 17 Export crops, tree Low-extensive, and crops, fishing severe (variable) Intensive Mixed 4 8 Coffee, fruit Low Cereal-livestock 5 6 Rice, livestock Low-moderate Moist Temperate 1 1 Dairy, beef, tourism Low Maize-Beans 3 10 Maize, beans, coffee Extensive, severe Intensive Highland 2 3 Vegetables, coffee, Low-extensive cattle/pigs, cereals Extensive Mixed 11 9 Livestock, oilseeds, Low-moderate grains, coffee Temperate Mixed 5 6 Livestock, wheat, Low soybean Dryland Mixed 6 9 Livestock, maize, Extensive (especially cassava drought-induced) Extensive Dryland 3 2 Livestock, cotton, Moderate subsistence High Altitude 6 7 Tubers, sheep, Extensive and severe llamas, grains Pastoral 3 1 Sheep, cattle Low-moderate Sparse 1 <1 Sheep, cattle, tourism Low Urban Based <1 3 Dairy, poultry Low-moderate Poverty across the entire region is highly variable, and the same is true for agricultural populations. As the figure illustrates, the prevalence of poverty is extensive and extremely high in certain systems, such as high altitude and those affected by drought, while other systems are little affected by poverty. In addition, the percentage of the population and land involved in agricultural production is inconsistent throughout the region; urban-based systems, for example, employ less than three percent of the agricultural population on less than one percent of the land, while costal-plantation systems employ 17 percent of the agricultural population on nine percent of the available land. Approximately 30 percent of the region’s labor force is employed in agricultural or rural economic activities, which contribute 5.9 percent of the regional Gross Domestic Product (GDP) (FAO, 2006). The economic importance of agriculture, however, is highly variable between countries. Agricultural products account for above 10 percent of overall GDP in eleven of the 33 countries in the region, and up to 32 percent of the overall GDP in the case of Guyana (Figure 2). In addition, the GDP does not reflect the importance of the industry to regional development, nor does it account for the strategic importance of agricultural production to food safety and security in the region. According to United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization statistics, crop (57%) and livestock (43%) production accounted for $185,000 million in 2004 (FAO 2006). The value of crop and livestock production is inconsistent across country boundaries, with agricultural leaders like Brazil and Argentina accounting for approximately $110,000 million in 2004, while countries such as Panama and Haiti accounted for less than $10,000 million (Figure 3). Total crop value in 2004 can be aggregated as follows: cereals, oilseeds, fruits (21%), sugar (12%), vegetables (8%), coffee and spices (7%), roots and tubers (5%), pulses (2.5%), and plant fibers and rubber (2.5%). Total agricultural exports from the region included crops ($61,000 million), livestock ($13,500 million), forestry products ($5,800), and fishery products ($7,325 million) (FAO, 2006). Figure 2 Figure 3 Researchers estimate that agriculture and natural resources activities account for 160 million hectares of cultivated land in the region, 18 million of which are equipped for irrigation. An additional 600 million hectares are used for grazing and pastureland. Approximately 18 percent of the region’s potential for food, fiber and forestry production is currently being utilized, and only 1 percent of the available water for irrigation is being utilized (FAO, 2001). The lack of irrigation employed on-farm may also correlate to the lack of potable water available in many rural areas. An estimated 39 percent of the region’s rural population, or approximately 49 million people, have no access to potable water. Approximately 52 percent of the rural population, or 66 million people, have no access to basic sanitation facilities (World Bank, 2003). The lack of water infrastructure in the region’s rural areas, reduces the production potential for agriculture, and diminishes opportunities for processing value-added products, which often draw a greater profit than traditional farm products. Environmental degradation has come to the forefront of concerns with regional agriculture and natural resources production. Technology, usually presented by researchers and U.S. or European agribusiness companies as a “silver bullet” to solve production problems, is often applied inappropriately, due to a lack of knowledge on the farmer’s part. Inputs, such as fertilizers, pesticides, and plant genetic material, are often misused or abused by farmers, whether intentionally or no. Another concern is the reduction of forestlands, especially in tropical areas, due to crop production or livestock grazing. It is important to address these specific concerns when presenting technology and inputs to farmers involved in participatory programs, in order to prevent the same problems from occurring in the future. Challenges to Latin American and Caribbean Agriculture Agricultural activities play an important role in the survival of rural and urban populations in Latin America and the Caribbean. While the importance of the agriculture and natural resources industry cannot be measured simply in economic terms, it is important to develop systems of production and trade that are economically sustainable and integrated within existing traditional farming systems. Researchers must also account for the smaller average farm size (1-4 hectares) in the region when developing materials; many options that are feasible on larger, more intensive farms may not be effective on a smaller farm, while the opposite is also true. In addition, reducing trade barriers and encouraging sustainable global trade systems is crucial to the survival of regional agriculture. On a local level, controlling disease and addressing the sustainable use of limited natural resources and fishery resources is crucial to maintaining current levels of production, as well as encouraging future expansion of trade markets. In order to address challenges to agricultural production on both a local and regional level, support services maintained by government programs, farmer’s associations, and non-governmental organizations have been developed. Services provided are comparable to the extension system in the United States; services include informational programs, print and radio educational materials, and farmer research programs. Although the results of these programs may be immediately positive, they are generally not sustainable over time (Axinn & Axinn, 1997). In the past, the diffusion model was considered the most successful model for extension education. This model advocated the training and visit system, where extension workers would visit rural villages or farms, train farmers about certain technologies or methods, and rely on the farmers to educate their peers. Farmers participated on this system based upon wealth, literacy and progressiveness. Unfortunately, transfer of information from this more privileged class to the rest of the community was limited. As extension workers began to recognize the flaws of the diffusion model, they became interested in a “bottoms- up” approach to education. With this approach, farmers from a variety of backgrounds and status’ determined the agenda, content, methods of communication, and coordinators of education campaigns. Bottoms-up, or participatory systems, are separated into five separate categories: 1) participation of elites only, who serve as elected representatives and receive direct benefits of education and research efforts; 2) projects formulated and employed in the area by governments; 3) local people are consulted during project development, but not otherwise involved; 4) local people from different societal and occupation groups are represented in the planning and evaluating portions of the program; and 5) local representatives control all decision making. System 3 is the most commonly employed system now, although the involvement of stakeholders is still fairly limited. Systems 4 and 5 are the rarest among agricultural extension and development programs, although they are becoming more popular as a solution for addressing current problems. Unfortunately, participatory systems, like their earlier counterparts, are not without flaws. Support workers often assume that farmers are not competent, with little formal schooling and no advanced degrees. In addition, discrimination against indigenous groups, younger and older farmers, women farmers, and those in extreme poverty is still a problem in participatory systems. Information moves through privileged networks, including male groups, the wealthy upper classes, and adult leadership. To develop a successful participatory program, support service workers and researchers must address these problems while creating visible options for farmers, which emphasize the development of feasible, sustainable practices and training that can be passed on easily; incorporating farmer’s knowledge of the land, natural resources, climate and other conditions; and facilitating learning for all groups involved in agricultural activities. In order to address these problems, researchers must develop a greater understanding of the specific struggles faced by minority groups in Latin America and the Caribbean, while developing specific solutions to address these struggles. Statistics The following rates and projections are derived from the 2007 Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean (United Nations, 2008). All regional figures are derived from the estimated totals of 46 economies in Latin America and the Caribbean: Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, British Virgin Islands, Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Bolivia, Brazil, Cayman Islands, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Falklands Islands (Malvinas), French Guiana, Grenada, Guadeloupe, Guatemala, Guyana, Haiti, Honduras, Jamaica, Martinique, Mexico, Montserrat, Netherlands Antilles, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Puerto Rico, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad and Tobago, Turks and Caicos Islands, United States Virgin Islands and Uruguay. The 2007 population of Latin America and Caribbean countries was an estimated 527 million. The projected total population for the region, based upon average fertility rates, is estimated to reach 659 million by 2020, and increase to 769 million by 2050. The birth rate for the region, defined as the quotient of the mean number of births occurring during a given period and the average population of the region during the same period, was measured by the report over five year periods, starting in 1995. The birth rate for Latin America and the Caribbean, per thousand inhabitants, was estimated at 23.2 from 1995-2000 and 21.5 from 2000-2005. The rate is expected to consistently decline in the future; the report estimated a rate of 19.9 from 2005-2010, 18.3 from 2010-2015, and 16.9 from 2015-2020. The total fertility rate for the region, which measures the average number of children to be born to a woman during her period of fertility, was also estimated in five year periods. Between 1995-2000 and 2000-2005, the total fertility rate for the region was 2.7 and 2.5 children per woman, respectively. This average is also expected to decline between the periods of 2005-2010, 2010- 2015 and 2015-2020, estimated as 2.4, 2.2 and 2.1 children per woman, respectively. In 2000, 50.9 percent of the total population of Latin American and the Caribbean consisted of child dependants, defined as the ratio of children between 0-14 years of age to the population aged 15-64. This number is expected to decrease to 43 percent of the total population by 2010, and to 37 percent of the total population by 2020. All ratios are variable, however, across national boundaries. Guatemala, for example, had the highest percentage of child dependants in 2000, with 84.9 percent of the population under 15 years. By 2010, the ratio is expected to decrease to 76.8 percent, and again to 63.8 percent by 2020. Conversely, child dependant populations of Cuba and Barbados were reported at 29.7 percent and 29.8 percent, respectively. These ratios are expected to decline slightly, to 24.5 percent and 23.5 percent by 2010, and 21.1 percent and 21.8 percent by 2020, respectively. Total fertility rates are also variable between countries. Guatemala and Belize, with the highest reported rates during the 2000-2005 period, had estimated total fertility rates of 4.6 and 4.0, respectively. Barbados had the lowest reported total fertility rate, maintaining a rate of 1.5 between the periods of 1995-2000 and 2000-2005. While these statistics are minor compared to birth rates in other developing regions, it is important to note that birth rates and the number of child dependants in rural areas are often higher in rural areas. Many farming systems, especially systems that are mechanized, require larger families for agricultural labor. In these systems, children help with many on-farm tasks, such as weeding, fertilizing and harvesting, and are crucial to the survival of the farm. In addition, in rural areas, women often have less education and access to family planning and contraceptive services. Child mortality is often higher because of large distances from health facilities; often, large families are “insurance” for replacing other children, providing cheap labor on-farm, and caring for parents in old age (Boserup, 1984). Division of Labor The total rural population of Latin America and the Caribbean was approximately 129 million in 1999, with 110 million classified as agricultural population (FAO, 2001). Based upon current projections, the agricultural population of the region in 2030 will have changed little from its current level. Future actual numbers of people involved in agriculture depend upon the way farming systems evolve. For example, migration rates of the agricultural population to rural towns and urban areas are relative to poverty rates in the area; migration is therefore effected by such agricultural concerns as international commodity prices, urban growth, and exchange rates. The 2007 Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean reported widely fluctuating percentages of women employed in agriculture across countries (United Nations, 2008). For example, in 2006, Peru, the highest reporting country, estimated 33.4 percent of the female employed population was employed in the agricultural sector. During that same year, Argentina, the lowest reporting country, estimated 0.3 percent of the female employed population was employed in the agricultural sector. All estimates are derived based upon employed female population aged 15 years and up. It is noteworthy, however, that although only 17 percent of women engaged in agriculture were considered economically active in the region, a much larger percentage are involved in many aspects of farming systems. Women contribute to crop and livestock production, food and fiber processing, and domestic responsibilities beyond farm duties. In addition, women are vital to the evolution and adaptation of farming systems to current market trends and new technologies (FAO, 2001). According to Food and Agriculture Organization estimates (FAO 2006), 53 percent of the rural population is between the ages of 10 and 32 years old. A large percentage of rural youth are involved in agriculture and natural resources activities. This presents concerns with the dissemination of information of information from young extension workers to older farmers. An additional concern is targeting information and training to younger farmers, who may not other wise participate in programs. Literacy, Education and Access to Opportunities The 2007 Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean estimates the degree of illiteracy in populations aged 15 years and over in Latin America and the Caribbean. Illiteracy is determined based upon the ability to both read and write a short statement about everyday life. In 2005, 9.5 percent of the total population of Latin America and the Caribbean was illiterate. The illiteracy rate for the total male population of the region was 8.8 percent in 2005, while the illiteracy rate for the total female population was 10.3 percent (United Nations, 2008). According to UNESCO, however, the estimated illiteracy rate does not indicate the disparities that exist within nations and across national boundaries (UNESCO, 2002). Certain countries, including Argentina, Cuba and Uruguay, have illiteracy rates of less than five percent. In contrast, 13 percent of Brazilians, or approximately 16 million people, cannot read or write. The UNESCO report emphasizes that the “…bulk of these illiterates can be found in rural areas, among ethnic minorities and the poor.” (2002). According to a 2000 UNESCO report, education is compulsory in most Latin America and Caribbean countries, beginning variably between the ages of four and seven, and ending between the ages of eleven and seventeen (UNESCO, 2000). Enrollment in primary school for the region was 93 percent in 2002 (United Nations, 2005). In addition, national aggregates show that boys and girls have essentially equal access to primary schooling in the region, although girls are slightly under-represented in some areas of Central America and the Caribbean. The survival rates to grade five for the region, which measure the proportion of grade one students who go on to enroll in grade five, are markedly lower than the access rates. It should also be noted that the current education system often excludes traditionally marginalized groups, including indigenous peoples, Afro-Latino populations, and especially girls within those groups. In Guatemala, for example, indigenous girls are least likely to have ever been enrolled in school (Figure 4), although evidence suggests that, once enrolled, excluded girls do as well or better than excluded boys. The performance levels of majority children, however, are still markedly higher than those of excluded children in research studies (Figure 5). Figure 4 Figure 5 Literacy is important, especially for women and the poor, as it helps to increase the effectiveness of written materials used in education and instruction, marketing and awareness campaigns, which may be targeted towards these groups specifically. Access to basic education is also an important factor to consider when attempting connection with a rural audience. Education levels are generally lower for those in rural areas, especially those involved in agricultural production. Developing materials geared towards a more educated audience, for example using scientific jargon to explain the actions of a pesticide on plant biology, will not be as effective in reaching a rural audience. Poverty The 2007 Statistical Yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean reported 54.4 percent of rural populations living in poverty; that is, the percentage of population having incomes amounting to less than twice the cost of a basic food basket. The report estimates that 40.8 percent of rural populations live in extreme poverty; extreme poverty is defined as the percentage of population with incomes amounting to less than the cost of a food basket. A recent United States Department of Agriculture report estimates a sample basic food basket in Latin America to contain 2,170 calories, based upon region-specific standards recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (Meade & Rosen, 2002). The food basket formulated by the USDA was based upon a plant-based diet, with a goal to have 65 percent of daily calories from carbohydrates, 20 percent from fat, and 15 percent from protein. Information gathered from nine countries, including Bolivia, Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Peru, was used to determine the importance of food items to country-specific diets and the average availability and retail price for each item. Protein within the food basket was drawn from meat, milk and pulses; cereals, roots, bananas and plantains, and tubers were chosen as carbohydrates; vegetable oils represented fats. The estimation also considers that income is distributed more unevenly in Latin America than in many other regions of the world. One method for measuring inequality is the Gini coefficient, which determines the difference between actual distribution and equal distribution in which every person receives the exact same income (Morley, 2001). The coefficient varies between zero and one; zero represents perfect equality, while one represents a hypothetical situation in which one individual receives all income. The median Gini coefficient estimated for Latin America has been decreasing since the 1960s (53.2) to the 1990s (49.3). Despite this, the Latin American income distribution has been the most unequal in the world since the 1960s. According to the USDA, the poorest 20 percent of the population of the region own approximately 3.9 percent of the national income, while the richest 20 percent own an average of 55.3 percent of national income (Meade & Rosen, 2002). Improving the situation of producers, especially those operating in rural areas, may help to reduce cases of poverty in the region, as well as provide economic stimulus to towns and encourage the development of additional industries. Strengthening rural infrastructure, and increasing the quality of basic services, will also provide stability and improve the situation of people in the area. The prevalence of poverty in the region is noteworthy in relation to high levels of corruption found in most government and bureaucratic institutions. Researchers define corruption as the conventional greed and desire for wealth and power, but have also identified institutional corruption, especially within services for the poor and underprivileged classes, as maintaining the “self- interest” of those in power. Essentially, the tradition of patronage and corruption in Latin America and the Caribbean is being modernized through a bureaucracy, which creates obstacles through legal systems, paperwork and red tape, and the mal-distribution of assets. These socially accepted forms of discrimination against those in poverty must be considered when developing a participatory program geared toward specific groups. It is important to manage corruption and ensure that programs serve the interests of stakeholders. Women in Agriculture Women play an important role in the agriculture and natural resources industry in Latin America and the Caribbean. Researchers, however, often consider women farmers as a small minority, with little decision-making power on-farm. Other misconceptions about women farmers include that they are physically unable to handle agricultural work, their religious or social views will prevent them from participating, that the heavy workload involved in agricultural production will “scare” women away, and that men, such as husbands, fathers, and sons, may prevent women from participating. In addition, researchers often assume that information presented by education programs is not needed by or applicable to small-scale, subsistence farms, many of which are ran by women. In reality, Women head between 11 and 19 percent of all rural households (IDRC, 2000). Women farmers are especially important as managers of resources, such as soil and water, and their specific knowledge of crop traits, such as texture, color, shelf life, and nutritional content of certain crops. Women also play a role in domesticating wild species for cultivation, and are often responsible for local varieties of crops, such as beans, cassava, millet and groundnuts. Additionally, women farmers tend to have a greater knowledge of all aspects of the farming system, as they are often responsible for weeding, planting, harvesting, or marketing crops. By documenting women’s attitudes towards certain crops and practices, researchers may also be able to reduce poverty in the region. According to the International Development Research Center’s (IRDC) program on Participatory Research and Gender Analysis, women tend to prefer less labor-intensive crop varieties, especially early maturity to avoid seasonal hunger. These preferences are also associated with households in poverty, and researchers should account for the correlation between these preferences when developing programs to accommodate women and those in poverty (IRDC, 2000). Reaching out to women farmers is not only better science, because it records attitudes towards crops and inputs different from those of male farmers, but it is also cost-effective, as women are more likely to pass on their knowledge to family members and the community. One of the major challenges facing women in agriculture in the region is the lack of female extension workers or programs that strive to include women. Only 14 percent of all extension workers are female (Axinn & Axinn, 1997). Local Agricultural Research Committees, better known by their Spanish acronym as CIALs, are an example of existing participatory research programs. CIALS are locally-elected groups of farmers who test agricultural technology with support from NGOs. These committees allow farmers to express needs and participate in designing and implementing technology (World Bank, 2004). CIALs have been successful in eight Latin American countries. These programs, however, are not necessarily inclusive to women. In the Cauca region of Colombia, for example, there are 47 CIALs in operation. Four of these programs are women- only groups, while the other 43 have a 70 percent male, 30 percent female makeup (IRDC, 2000). Basic solutions to addressing women in participatory research programs include developing materials specifically for women, including written materials and educational presentations. In addition, attempting to incorporate women into existing programs, or adding a women’s component to a pre-existing project, may be economically feasible. Training more female extension workers, as well as re/training male extension workers to be more sensitive to the needs of women farmers, will also help to ensure that women become better incorporated into participatory research programs. In order to truly serve women farmers and stakeholders with participatory research programs, researchers and extension workers must make a conscious effort to direct funding and research towards these groups and address issues that specifically concern them. Indigenous Groups Indigenous groups account for between 28 and 43 million people in Latin America and the Caribbean. Indigenous people account for a large portion of the populations of Mexico (12%), Ecuador (38%), Guatemala (47%), and Peru (40%), and they are the majority in Bolivia (70%). In Latin America and the Caribbean, there are more than 800 indigenous groups, each with distinct cultures and languages. In Mexico alone, there are 56 indigenous groups with 62 separate languages (Toledo, n.d.). Also, many people who consider themselves as mestizo may be descended from indigenous people, and may retain many of their cultural traits; including these groups might increase the estimated number of indigenous people. Based on research about biodiversity, there are 12 countries with house the highest numbers of species of mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians, freshwater fishes, butterflies, tiger-beetles, and flowering plants; half of those countries are located in Latin America. The diversity of populations often coincide with areas of high biodiversity, or “megadiversity” countries, such as Brazil, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Ecuador, and Venezuela. The indigenous peoples of Brazil, who number only 250,000, possess and maintain an area of 100+ million hectares of land, mostly in the Amazon Basin. Almost 60 percent of areas recommended for protection in central and southern Mexico are inhabited by indigenous groups (Toledo, n.d.). Researchers may have difficulty differentiating between indigenous and non-indigenous agricultural populations. Indigenous people may farm alongside, and use similar practices as, mestizo populations in rural areas. Indigenous people, however, may employ a greater amount of plant diversity in cropping systems. In indigenous systems, there is little monoculture, and farmers strive to conserve plant genetic resources. Indigenous farmers often employ semi- domesticated and wild relatives of traditional crops, or may plant and harvest non-domesticated crop species (Coomes & Burt, 1997). An additional concern is seasonal movements and traditional rights to land of indigenous groups. Indigenous groups often maintain communal lands, or preserve traditional migration patterns throughout the year. Researchers must be sensitive to these movements when reaching out to indigenous populations. In addition, many indigenous groups have traditionally been marginalized and often have little representation in local government or access to basic services. A successful participatory research program that addresses the concerns of indigenous people will incorporate and apply the traditional knowledge of plant and animal systems of these groups. In addition, researchers will create programs that are culturally sensitive, including providing bilingual male and female extension workers. Participatory programs should encourage conservation efforts in areas of high biodiversity, and apply existing conservation practices of indigenous groups. Finally, programs should attempt to empower indigenous groups in the local community, by encouraging equal and fair representation and treatment for indigenous and non-indigenous people. Future Potential In the future, extension workers and researchers must refocus their efforts to address the needs and concerns of marginalized and underrepresented groups. Performing further research into the dynamics of groups, determining their specific needs, and developing strategies for addressing concerns will be important steps towards ensuring the efficacy of programs. Participatory programs have the potential to provide stability to areas and groups in extreme poverty, and to provide an additional source of income to move individuals beyond subsistence farming and increase export values. Outreach efforts can also provide a solution to many environmental degradation concerns, by teaching the proper employment of inputs and technology. Increasing the effectiveness of participatory programs will lead to a greater understanding of agricultural problems abroad, and allow for the development creative solutions which incorporate traditional knowledge and the concerns of all stakeholder groups. References Axinn, G., & Axinn, N. (1997). Collaboration in international rural development: A practitioner’s handbook. Sage: New Delhi. Boserup, E. (1984). Technical change and human fertility in rural areas of developing countries. Retrieved April 30, 2008 from http://www.popline.org/docs/0657/029676.html. Coomes, O.T., & Burt, G.J. (1997). Indigenous market-oriented agroforestry: dissecting local diversity in western Amazonia. Agroforestry Systems, 37, 27-44. Food and Agriculture Organization. (1997). Gender and participation in agricultural development planning. Retrieved November 30, 2006, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/X0254E/x0254e00.HTM. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2001). Farming systems and poverty. Retrieved April 13, 2008 from ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/003/Y1860E/Y1860E00.PDF. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2006). Trends and challenges in agriculture, forestry, fisheries and food security in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved April 12, 2008 from http://www.rlc.fao.org/es/larc/larc06/pdf/inf06e.pdf. International Monetary Fund. (2007). Getting all girls into school. Retrieved from April 13, 2008 from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2007/06/lewis.htm. IDRC. (2000). Accounting for gender in participatory agricultural research. Retrieved April 13, 2008 from http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-5576-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html Meade, B. & Rosen, S. (2002). Measuring access to food in developing countries: The case of Latin America. Retrieved April 12, 2008 from http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/123456789/16121/1/sp02me01.pdf. Morley, S. (2001). The income distribution problem in Latin America. United Nations Publications: Santiago, Chile. Toledo, Victor M. (n.d.). Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. Retrieved April 13, 2008 from http://www.iea.ad/cbd/congres/cima99/toledo.pdf. UNESCO. (2000). Latin America and the Caribbean: Selected education indicators, 2000. http://www.unesco.org/education/efa_report/zoom_regions/latinamericacar_eng.x. UNESCO. (2002). Literacy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved April 13, 2008 from http://portal.unesco.org/education/en/ev.phpURL_ID=8519&URL_DO=DO_TO C&URL_SECTION=201.html. United Nations. (2005). The Millennium Development Goals: A Latin American and Caribbean perspective. United Nations Publications: Santiago, Chile. United Nations. (2008). Statistical yearbook for Latin America and the Caribbean, 2007. United Nations Publications: Santiago, Chile. World Bank. (2003). Overview. Retrieved April 14, 2008 from http://wbln0018.worldbank.org/LAC/lacinfoclient.nsf/e9dd232c66d43b6b852567 2005ca3c5/866a689e8cd3b7d485256cef007c2c66/$FILE/overview.pdf World Bank. (2004). Local agricultural research committees. Retrieved April 30, 2008 from http://www-esd.worldbank.org/ais/index.cfm?Page=mdisp&m=2&p=04.