Measuring the Growth Factor via Gravitational Lensing

W
Document Sample
scope of work template
							                         Measuring the Growth Factor
                          via Gravitational Lensing

                                  James Taylor
                              University of Waterloo




Origins of Dark Energy                                 Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
       Observational Paths to Dark Energy
         • line-of-sight distances, e.g. DL(a) from SNe
         • physical scales, e.g. the sound horizon from
            Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
         • volumes, e.g. from cluster number counts?
                                                              }        geometry


         • the growth of potential fluctuations (ISW)
         • the growth of linear fluctuations (cosmic shear)
         • the abundance of non-linear fluctuations
            (cluster number counts)
                                                              }        growth of
                                                                       structure

         • the differential growth of non-linear structure

                         Both ultimately measure H(a) or i(a),
                         but with very different redshift weighting.


Origins of Dark Energy                                          Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
   Probes of Structure Formation
     Initial perturbations are small, grow linearly to amplitude D(a):

                                         QuickTime™ and a
     Growth Factor:                  TIFF (LZW) decomp resso r
                                  are need ed to see this picture.

                                                                                       Horellou & Berge 2005



     (normalized to 1 at the a = 1), where
     D is the amplitude of the growing mode.

                                                                            QuickTime™ and a
     For EdS, g = 1 at all times                                        TIFF (LZW) decompressor
                                                                     are neede d to see this picture.


     For other e.o.s., varies with a:




Origins of Dark Energy                                                        Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Probes of structure growth using gravitational lensing:

      1) Cosmic shear from weak lensing
               linear and non-linear fluctuations on a range of scales
              (complicated inversion problems)
      2) Cluster detection and characterization from weak and strong lensing
                abundance of high peaks in the density field
                   (degenerate in 8 and growth)

      3) Differential growth of non-linear structure
               (interesting, but may be hard to calibrate?)




Origins of Dark Energy                                        Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Cosmic Shear, etc.                                               overdense   underdense               B-mode
                                                                                                       (systematic)

      Mass overdensity produces tangential distortion of
      light rays from background objects; underdensity
      produces radial distortion.

      Effect always small, so need to average over 100s of objects (i.e. galaxies)
       limit to scales probed, intrinsic shape noise.


      * Can look at resulting signal statistically: shear correlation measuring correlation of
      overdense/underdense regions as a function of angular scale.

      * Can also make smoothed maps of resulting shear or convergence.

      Redshift dependence of effect is very slow, producing a very broad kernel in redshift
      space:
                         QuickTime™ and a
                     TIFF (LZW) decompres sor
                  are needed to see this picture.




Origins of Dark Energy                                                               Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
     3D Lensing Tomography                               zs = 0.8                     zs = 1.0




sensitivity
       1/c




  Single source plane produces one weighted
  measurement of mass along the l.o.s.

  In principle, differences between planes can produce
  a 3D mass map or more indirect 3D shear statistics

  Some problems from extent of redshift kernel,
  inaccuracies in photo-zs


 Origins of Dark Energy                                             Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  The COSMOS Survey      P.I. Nick Scoville




Origins of Dark Energy                    Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  The COSMOS Survey
     2 square degree ACS mosaic
     current lensing results from
       1.64 square degrees
     2-3 million galaxies down to
       F814WAB = 26.6
     15-band photometry,
       photo-zs with dz ~ 0.03(1+z)
       to z = 1.4 and IF814W = 24
     follow-up in X-ray, radio, IR, UV




Origins of Dark Energy                    Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  WL Convergence Maps
   Massey, Rhodes, Leauthaud
   Capak, Koekemoer, Scoville, Refregier


       cut catalogue down to
       40 galaxies/arcmin2 to remove bad zs

       correct for PSF variations, CTE

       Get lensing maps, low-resolution
        3D maps, various measures of power
        in 2D and restricted 3D

       results compare well with baryonic
        distributions (e.g. galaxy distribution)




Origins of Dark Energy                             Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  Systematics
      instrumental systematics a major and unanticipated headache
       (PSF variations, CTE)




                                           QuickTime™ and a
                                  TIFF (Uncompressed) decompre ssor
                                     are neede d to see this picture.




Origins of Dark Energy                                                  Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  The Final Result




                                      are need ed to see this p icture .
                                         TIFF (LZW) decomp ressor
                                             QuickTime™ an d a




                         E-modes (left) versus B-modes (right)


Origins of Dark Energy                                                     Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  Seeing the Growth of Structure Directly
      actually quite complicated to show the
      growth of structure going forward in time




                                             QuickTime™ and a
                                    TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
                                       are neede d to see this picture.




Origins of Dark Energy                                                    Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  Measuring the Growth of Structure
     Calculate the shear correlation function divided by the integrated lensing
     sensitivity to a given slice, and rescale to a fixed physical scale, assuming
     the signal is coming from the redshift of peak sensitivity.

     Get (rather noisy) measure of the growth of structure:




                                                                            Massey et al. 2007b


Origins of Dark Energy                                                    Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    3D Mass Distribution
        Final result: first 3D map of the mass (or potential) distribution in a large
        volume. Note this is only 1.6 square degrees on the sky.




                                           QuickTime™ and a
                                  TIFF (Uncompressed) decompre ssor
                                     are neede d to see this picture.




                                                                         Massey et al. 2007a




Origins of Dark Energy                                                  Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
         Shear vs. photo-z around peaks, along promising lines
                                of sight




Origins of Dark Energy                            Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
         Shear vs. photo-z around peaks, along promising lines
                                of sight




                                                             N.B. angular-
                                                             diameter
 Taylor et al.                                               distance-z
 in prep.                                                    relation




Origins of Dark Energy                            Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
 Summary                                                                   2D
                                                                                       QuickTime™ and a
                                                                                   TIFF (L ZW) decompressor
                                                                                are needed to see this picture.


     Can get constraints on the amplitude of fluctuations:
                                                                                       QuickTime™ and a
                                                                                   TIFF (LZW) decompressor
                                                                           3D   are neede d to see this picture.



     Need a larger volume to get constraints on the equation of state
     (current estimate: w = -1 ± 1 with this volume)

     Working from space does not automatically make systematics vanish.

     Physically, projection effects and photo-z errors a major issue.




                                              QuickTime™ and a
                                     TIFF (Uncompressed) decompre ssor
                                        are neede d to see this picture.




Origins of Dark Energy                                                          Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Second Method: Cluster Number Counts
         Count the number of high peaks in the universe

                                                                                        QuickTime™ and a
         In principle a very sensitive measure                               TIFF (Un compressed) decompressor
                                                                                 are neede d to se e this picture.


         In practice, mass calibrations a problem

         Also constrained to do this at fairly low redshift
         (esp. for x-ray) and fairly large mass
                                                                                            Weller & Battye 2003

        N.B. Press-Schechter:

                                                  QuickTime™ and a
                                              TIFF (LZW) decompressor
                                           are neede d to see this picture.




                     How to break sigma-growth factor degeneracy?

Origins of Dark Energy                                                           Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Third Method: Differential Growth
         Dark matter halos achieve a different degree of relaxation depending
          on their growth rate (mass accretion rate versus crossing time?)

         The change between the mixed and unmixed regions corresponds to a
        change in the slope of the density profile: r-1 to r-3

         This is measured as halo concentration: c  rs/rvir; rs where slope is r-2

         Thus the concentration of the density profile contains information
          about prior growth

         Other structural features (substructure, elongation, spin?)
          track this one parameter




Origins of Dark Energy                                               Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
      QuickTime™ an d a
 YUV420 codec decompressor
are need ed to see this picture.




                                   Andrei Kravtsov
        Some reassuring simplifications in the non-linear regime:
        e.g. a single-parameter density profile




        Navarro et al. 2004

                              Similarly, a single-parameter mass-accretion history?
                                            cf. van den Bosch, Wechsler et al., Mo et al.


Origins of Dark Energy                                                   Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
So how do haloes grow?
Extended Press-Schechter (e.g. Lacey & Cole 1993)
mass accretion history = random walk in       / (where   c/D)


                                 high




           increasing barrier height                 QuickTime™ and a
                                                 TIFF (LZW) decompressor
                                              are neede d to see this picture.




   : height of barrier           low
  perturbation has to
  cross to collapse                     big                                                small

  (M) : variance
  on mass scale M
                                                  decreasing scale

Origins of Dark Energy                                                     Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
What does concentration measure?

Mass accretion histories
correspond to linear

trajectories in   - space
Transformation to M - a
introduces curvature

concentration depends on                 QuickTime™ and a
                                TIFF (Uncompressed) decompressor
                                   are neede d to see this picture.
epoch where transition from
fast to slow accretion starts

Depends mainly on dlnD/dlna




Origins of Dark Energy                                      Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
   What does concentration measure?
QuickTime™ and a
ompressed) decompressor     ac   slow
de d to see this picture.



                                        Concentration set in transition
                                        from fast to slow accretion

                                        curvature in log(M/M0) vs. log(a)
                                        mainly due to curvature in D(a)

                                        So in effect we can measure
       fast
                                        dlnD/dln(a) with some weighting.




        cNFW ~ 4 (ao/ac)


   Origins of Dark Energy                            Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
Concentration versus mass accretion history




        Wechsler et al. 2002: ac/ao vs concentration   Zhao et al. 2003a: better fitting function




Origins of Dark Energy                                                         Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
Can we measure concentration?




                         Comerford & Natarajan 2007:
                         X-ray and Lensing concentrations for O(100) clusters
Origins of Dark Energy                                            Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
   N.B. other age indicators: Halo Substructure

     The “radial period” (period for subsequent pericentric
     passages)
     is the fundamental timescale for subhalo evolution 
     substructure
     tracks tH
    Radius/Rvi
    r
                                         QuickTime™ and a
                                     TIFF (LZW) decompressor                                M/Minf
                                  are neede d to see this picture.


    Energy/Vc2




                                                                      Taylor & Babul 2004




Origins of Dark Energy                                               Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
           Substructure reflects balance between accretion and disruption




                         Taylor & Babul 2005a




Origins of Dark Energy                                      Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
           Overall effect of age on the substructure mass function:




                         Taylor & Babul 2005a


Origins of Dark Energy                                       Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
     Global Substructure vs. Age Relation

     Overall correlation between age and substructure fraction:
     number of massive satellites strongly correlated with recent merger history




                                         QuickTime™ and a
                                     TIFF (LZW) decompressor
                                  are neede d to see this picture.




                                                                     Zentner et al. 2005



Origins of Dark Energy                                                    Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
     Three Lensing Surveys:
          * COSMOS        (Scoville PI, Ellis, Massey, Rhodes, Leauthaud, Finoguenov)
          2 deg2 ACS weak lensing, plus X-ray & other supporting observations
          ~150 extended X-ray peaks, ~ 20 in lensing map, z = 0.15 –0.85, M 5e13
          .
          * Suprime22 (Miyazaki/Ellis, Green, Hamana, Massey)
           22 deg2 Subaru weak lensing, some x-ray, Keck/Subaru redshifts ~80
          objects from lensing (with masses to ~50%), z = 0.15–0.8, , M 1e14



          * LoCuSS (Smith PI)
          ~all sky, nearby massive cluster survey z = 0.15–0.25, Lx limited, ACS
          snapshot lensing, some ground-based NIR, XMM & archival Chandra x-ray,
          objects typically 5e14, current sample of 30 clusters, final sample of ~100



Origins of Dark Energy                                               Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
  LoCuSS: Sample
 Original Idea:

 •   Target = 100 clusters
 •   Brightest X-ray clusters
     over a narrow z range
     suited to f.o.v. of WFPC/ACS   Pilot (XBACs): JPK+ GO:8249
 •   21 archival HST clusters       LoCuSS (BCS+eBCS+REFLEX):
                                    GPS+ GO:10881
 •   143 SNAPSHOT targets
      – ~50% observed by
          mid-2008

 Current Status:
     – More or less complete
        data on 43 clusters
     – Many are strong lensing
        systems


Origins of Dark Energy                             Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Why the diversity of cluster morphologies?
    What is happening physically?
                                                 (Smith et al. 2005)




Origins of Dark Energy                            Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
 Disturbed Versus Undisturbed                         Smith et al., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 417


                         Undisturbed        Disturbed                Disturbed
                         uni-modal (3/10)   multi-modal (4/10)       uni-modal (3/10)

Mass

X-ray


       Ndm            1                         2                         1
       fsub      0.03±0.01                  0.23±0.01                0.04±0.01
       Ttot/Tann  0.8±0.1                    1.0±0.1                  1.0±0.2
       Δr (kpc)      <4                       40±8                      88±4


Origins of Dark Energy                                              Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
                           Structural segregation in the
                                  M-T relation?

                                                     • Mass measurement wrong for
                                                       non-SL clusters?
                                        Structural
                                       segregation   • Core-related phenomena?
                                         [~40%]
                                                        – Pederson et al., 0603260
                                                     • Cluster-cluster mergers?
                                   Possible             – Ricker & Sarazin 2001,
                                 Systematics?
                                  [~10-20%]               Randall et al. 2003
                                                     • What else?



              Smith et al., 2005, MNRAS, 359, 417




Origins of Dark Energy                                               Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Compare main central component to the substructure:
    A wide range of substructure fractions  age difference?




            QuickTime™ and a
       TIFF (LZW) decompressor
    are needed to see this picture.




             (Smith et al. 2005)


                  Overall, seems likely that substructure and possibly X-ray
                  scaling offsets provide another way of quantifying age
                  obsevationally.

Origins of Dark Energy                                         Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
     Summary

       The measuring the growth factor provides a complimentary estimate of the
       equation of state, with different redshift weighting.

       At least three methods exist; the third relies on the statistics of halo growth
           and the effect of mass accretion rates on halo profiles, substructure
           and other properties (spin? X-ray scaling offsets? AGN activity?).

       Whether this third method can be calibrated to a useful degree is not clear;
         then again similar problems exist with cluster mass measurements.




Origins of Dark Energy                                              Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
    Recent Suprime22 Results
    (Green et al. 2006)        8
                                          6




                                           3


                                               worse seeing

                                               better seeing




                                            Log(volume)




Origins of Dark Energy              Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007
   COSMOS Xray-lensing comparison
   (Finoguenov et al. 2006, Taylor et al in prep.)

                                            8 6 3




                                                               Log(volume)


Origins of Dark Energy                                 Origins Institute, May 14-17 2007

						
Related docs
Other docs by qingyunliuliu
tuvalu worksheet
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
PHCcom
Views: 151  |  Downloads: 0
CALM_SLI
Views: 254  |  Downloads: 0
2010BillStatusReport_000
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
SAN MANUEL AIRPORT
Views: 145  |  Downloads: 0
Chapter 6 Coding and Classification
Views: 151  |  Downloads: 0
CA2009-20_UWGuidelineSum
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
guze05_fox
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Untitled - Idaho
Views: 364  |  Downloads: 0