CVE 4070
Document Sample


CVE 4070
Construction Engineering
Law for Engineers
Prof. Ralph V. Locurcio, PE
Law for Engineers…
Government vs.. Private contracts
Types of Contracts in Construction
Resolution of disputes
Legal vs. Engineering training
Introduction to Law & Contract Law
Most common problems
Intro to Contract Law
What is a contract
Offer and acceptance
Mutual assent
Authority & capacity to issue
Key elements of a contract
Format & standard clauses
Standards of care
Are construction contracts different
Contracts used in Construction
What are pitfalls of each…or where do
claims & disputes arise…
Fixed price – slow - hard bid, all info known
Unit price – faster - prices known, quantities unkown
Cost +Fixed Fee – fastest - scope, time & prices not fixed
Cost plus Incentive Fee – same with incentive
Design-Build w/ Max Price – all risk to contractor
Govt vs. Private Contracts
Open to all taxpayers
Level of detail greater
Equal opportunity & social content
Recordkeeping important
Use of commercial specs & products
Resolution of disputes
Negotiations
ADR & informal resolution
DRB, dispute resolution clauses
Arbitration
Litigation
Lawyers vs.. engineers
Legal training vs.. engineering
Subjects studied & method
Rules of evidence
Use of facts vs.. judgments
Professional values… what’s important
What is project success to a lawyer
What’s wrong with engineers
What causes most claims or lawsuits
Law School Curriculum: 1st year
1. Civil Procedure (4 sem. hrs.)
2. Constitutional Law (4 sem. hrs.)
3. Contracts (4 sem. hrs.)
4. Criminal Law (3 sem. hrs.)
5. Lawyering Skills I, II, III, and IV (2 sem. hrs.each)
6. Property (4 sem. hrs.)
7. Professional Responsibility (2 sem. hrs.)
8. Torts (4 sem. hrs.)
Total: 33 sem. hrs
Law School Curriculum: 2 & 3 yrs
Upper-Level Elective Courses
Select one of the following areas of concentration to see a
listing of the courses offered in each category:
1. Administrative Law and Government Regulation
2. Commercial Law
3. Constitutional Law/Civil Rights
4. Corporate Law
5. Criminal Law
6. Environmental Law and Real Property
7. Family Law and Estates
8. Intellectual Property
9. International and Comparative Law
10. Legal Theory, History and Interdisciplinary Studies
11. Taxation
12. Trial and Appellate Practice
Legal logic vs. Engineering logic
One solution vs. many possibilities
Assumptions vs. hard facts
Science vs. art
Correct vs. acceptable
Finite answer vs. vague solution
professional duty vs. social context
Result vs. process
Basics of Law
Private vs.. Public law
Torts & Contracts
Consent
Privilege
Immunity
Standard of Care & Negligence
Strict & Corporate Liability
Causation
Civil Litigation
Private vs.. Public Law
Private Law
Rights & duties of private citizens to each other
Contract Law
Tort Law
Family Law
Property Law
Public Law
Rights & duties of private citizens to the government
The Law of Contracts-1
Deal between two parties
Agreement between two individuals
Meeting of the minds
Voluntary
Compensation
Formalities: e.g. signing or handshake
May not be contrary to Public Policy
Freedom of Contract
Voluntary nature
Ethical to bargain for own interests
Basis of “free markets”
The Law of Contracts-2
Enforceable by law
Breach or Default
Default or Breach causes damages
Damages
Relief
No punitive damages
Violation not considered “morally” wrong
Law of Torts-1
Law of Duties
People have interests
Others obligated to respect
Social obligation - not an “agreement”
Much more diverse & changing than contract law
Governed by “case law”
Remedies
Violation causes “damage” to one party
Remedies judged to compensate for damages
Law of Torts-2
Types of torts
Assault & battery
Wrongful death
False imprisonment
Libel, slander & defamation
Trespass
Nuisance
Newer torts
Privacy
Emotional distress
Product liability
Law of Torts-3
Duty of Fiduciary Responsibility
Duty to protect the interest of another
May not act in “self-interest”
Examples: doctors, lawyers, engineers
Responsibility is not “negotiable”
Violation considered “morally” wrong
Law of Torts-4
Exceptions
Consent – express or implied, but “informed”
Doctor discusses medical procedures
Financial advisor discusses risk
Privilege
Intrusions acceptable in pursuit of higher social goals
Fireman or social worker may invade privacy
Must be carefully applied
Immunity
Family, charitable & sovereign immunity
Torts law waived
Law of Torts-5
Standard of Care
Defines the “limits” of the duty relationship
Doctor exercises “due care”
Engineer uses “appropriate” safety precautions
Concept of the Reasonable Man/Person
How would a “reasonable” person act in the same
circumstances
Failure = negligence implies “fault”
Negligence most common form of tort liability
Fault is basis for tort liability
Liability for Torts
Liability requires negligence or intent
Corporate liability relates to policies
UPS does not have “safe driving” policy
Engineering without “standards”
Personal liability to individual actions
UPS truck driver causes accident
Strict liability does not require intent or
negligence
Causation & proximate cause
Read Ed Kinberg’s 4 articles…
Legal aspects of contracting
Construction law notes
Avoiding litigation by risk management
Avoiding disputes with your builder
Causes for Claims & Lawsuits
Lack of common understanding
Expectations: general vs. specific
Standards to be followed; specifications
Outcomes and quality
Clear roles of parties
Mistake in bid
Basis for payment – hourly vs. lump sum
Basis for changes – agreement on scope, cost & time
Lack of documentation
Dispute resolution process; failure to act promptly
Read & understand the contract
Failure to manage risk
Most common problems
Negligence
Breach of contract
Verbal changes
Constructive changes
Unclear scope of work
Inaccurate contract documents
Differing site conditions
Shop drawings & submittals
Ed Kinberg’s Top 10 List
Today’s topic is…
“The top 10 ways that engineers foul up construction
contracts resulting in claims, disputes and more
money for lawyers like Ed Kinberg…”
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
#10 – Engineers forget to put dates on their
contract drawings & documents which fails to
establish a point of reference for contract
performance.
#9 – Engineers are overly precise; they worry
about the small details and often miss the big
picture.
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
#8 – Engineers overlook flaws in procedure that later
can become legally binding.
#7 – They fail to settle both time & money issues on
change orders resulting in later claims.
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
#6 – Engineers neglect to document what they
observe & hear on the job site; resulting in
poor memory when claims are adjudicated.
#5 – Engineers stand on principle and forget that
the judge & jury will do what sounds right to
them… based on the evidence as presented.
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
#4 – Engineers forget that the engineer of record
can be held “personally” liable for negligent work.
#3 – Engineers also forget that they can be sued for
up to 15 years for a “latent defect” that no one
knew was present.
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
#2 – Engineers are not very good communicators;
so they fail to establish good solid working
relationships, based on frequent
communications, with their contractors.
Kinberg’s Top 10 List
And the #1 reason that engineers foul up
construction contracts resulting in more money for
lawyers is…
#1 - They fail to read the most important part of
the contract documents… which is…
the scope of work!!!!
Happy Thanxgiving!!
Related docs
Other docs by pengtt
Introduction to IPv6 IPv6 deployment IPv6 Forum IPv6 Transition support IPv6 IPv4 and
Views: 5 | Downloads: 0
Get documents about "