Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number G08-04-04-S02 Question Number 3 Applicant Score 0 Division Score 2
# 1 2
Applicant American Desert Foundation BLM - Arcata Field Office
Project Title Education & Safety
Question Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project was developed with public input employing the following In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as The underlying problem that resulted in the need for the Restoration Project has been effectively addressed and resolved Scientific and cultural studies will The Project will utilize personnel trained to the following level The Project will provide search and rescue as follows The Project will have the majority of personnel trained in the following areas The Project will have resources that are equipped and trained for rescue in the following environmental conditions*
Division Remarks First time applicant. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant did not fully explain public meeting. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant describes prior projects as other recycled activities. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Applicant failed to appropriately explain "yes" answer. This project is not a Scientific Study. Project description describes an Education project, however applicant responded to “Safety” criteria. Project description describes an Education project, however applicant responded to “Safety” criteria. Project description describes an Education project, however applicant responded to “Safety” criteria. Project description describes an Education project, however applicant responded to “Safety” criteria. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The narrative does not support the item selected. Applicant had input Wilderness Study Area - program did not compute the points. This is not a Scientific Study.
General Criteria Ground Operations 3 BLM - Barstow Field Office General Criteria El Mirage OHV Ground Operations Barstow OHV Ground Operations Afton Canyon Restoration Juniper Flats Restoration G08-01-02-G01
6 4
0 2
3 1
6 G08-01-04-G01 7
0 4
3 3
G08-01-04-G03
8
4
0
G08-01-04-R03 G08-01-04-R04
10 9
3 1
0 0
Education & Safety
G08-01-04-S01
12
5
0
Education & Safety
G08-01-04-S01
13
5
0
Education & Safety
G08-01-04-S01
14
12
0
Education & Safety
G08-01-04-S01
15
8
0
Education & Safety 4 BLM - Bishop Field Office General Criteria Planning
G08-01-04-S01
3
6 G08-01-05-P01 7
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Planning Project sustains OHV Opportunity in the following manner Natural and Cultural Resources - Failure to fund the Project will result in adverse impacts to: Scientific and cultural studies will
0
3
0 3
3 0
Restoration Chidago WSA G08-01-05-R01 Restoration Alabama Hills G08-01-05-R03
2 9
5 2
7 0
Page 1 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question
Division Remarks Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The Soil Conservation Plan indicates the land manager has a systematic methodology for evaluating soil conditions. Applicant does not appropriately describe how project provide for multi-use.
Education & Safety 5 BLM - California Desert District General Criteria
G08-01-05-S01
3
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. Land Manager has developed a systematic methodology for evaluating soil conditions of its OHV Opportunities?
0
3
0
3
General Criteria Ecology - Desert Tortoise Large-Plot Monitoring Ecology - CDD Mojave Fringe-toed Lizard Population Monitoring Ecology - CDD Mojave Fringe-toed Lizard Population Monitoring Ecology - CDD Mojave Fringe-toed Lizard Population Monitoring Ecology - CDD Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodland Bird Monitoring Ecology - CDD Sonoran Desert Thorn Woodland Bird Monitoring CDD OHV Travel for Washes for NECO Plan Compliance CDD OHV Travel for Washes for NECO Plan Compliance
12 a.
0
5
G08-01-06-G02
3
The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by
4
3
G08-01-06-G03
3
The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by
3
2
Project does not include signage.
G08-01-06-G03
4
The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities
2
0
Applicant failed to show public input including meetings or conference calls.
G08-01-06-G03
9
6
0
The monitoring project does not improve access to non-motorized use.
G08-01-06-G04
3
The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project will avoid and/or minimize impact to natural and cultural resources by The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities
3
0
Monitoring project does not include signage activities. The project for monitoring does not provide for motorized access to nonmotorized recreation. Applicant failed to connect public meetings and/or conference calls to this specific project. The monitoring activities of this project does not include the construction of barriers. The project for monitoring does not provide for motorized access to nonmotorized recreation. Applicant does not appropriately describe the type and severity of impacts that might occur relative to the checked items.
G08-01-06-G04
9
6
0
G08-01-06-G05
4
2
0
G08-01-06-G05
6
2
1
CDD OHV Travel for Washes for NECO Plan Compliance G08-01-06-G05 Restoration Wilderness Restoration VIII
9
6
0
G08-01-06-R03
2
Natural and Cultural Resources - Failure to fund the Project will result in adverse impacts to:
8
0
Page 2 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title Restoration Wilderness Restoration VIII Restoration Wilderness Restoration VIII Restoration Wilderness Restoration VIII Safety - TV Show: OHV Tour of Old Mining Districts Safety - TV Show: OHV Tour of Old Mining Districts
Question Measures to ensure success the Project makes use of the following elements to ensure successful implementation The Project was developed with public input employing the following
Division Remarks Applicant failed to provide appropriate explanation for each item checked above. Applicant failed to appropriately explain conference calls.
G08-01-06-R03
4
8
0
G08-01-06-R03
7
2
1
G08-01-06-R03
9
Scientific and cultural studies will
1
0
G08-01-06-S01
3
Previous Year Performance The Project was developed with public input employing the following In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
This is not a Scientific Study. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to explain conference calls. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
G08-01-06-S01
6
2
1
6
BLM - California State Office General Criteria Planning- Develop Statewide Protocol and Capacity Building to Implement OHMVR So BLM OHV Site Analyses for Field Office Staff Support 6
0
3
G08-01-07-P02
2
The Planning Project would address the following
4
3
The narrative does not support all items selected. The narrative does not support all items selected. The narrative does not support all items selected. The narrative does not support the response selected. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to appropriately explain meetings with the general public. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
G08-01-07-P03
2
The Planning Project would address the following The Planning Project sustains OHV Opportunity in the following manner Funds for implementing the completed plan have been identified
4
3
Planning Meccacopia Soil Survey G08-01-07-P04 Planning Meccacopia Soil Survey G08-01-07-P04
7
6
3
8
5
0
Education & Safety Education & Safety 7 BLM - Eagle Lake Field Office General Criteria
G08-01-07-S01 G08-01-07-S01
3 6
6
Previous Year Performance The Project was developed with public input employing the following In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0 2
3 1
0
3
Page 3 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question
Division Remarks Narrative does not address weekly ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation approved training courses. The narrative only addresses on how to find an approved safety institute and/or motorcycle training course. Applicant failed to appropriately explain identification of alternate OHV routes to ensure that OHV activities will not reoccur in restored area. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The narrative indicates ATV safety courses are offered once a year not monthly as selected. Narrative indicates a future action. The project area is not fenced. This is not a Scientific Study.
General Criteria
8 d.
ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation approved training courses are offered Measures to ensure success the Project makes use of the following elements to ensure successful implementation In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation approved training courses are offered The Applicant or Land Manager conducts, or causes to be conducted, sound level testing The Project will avoid and/or minimize impact to natural and cultural resources by Scientific and cultural studies will As calculated on the Project Cost Estimate, the percentage of the cost of the Project covered by the Applicant is
3
0
Restoration 8 BLM - El Centro Field Office General Criteria
G08-01-08-R01
4
12
10
6
0
3
General Criteria General Criteria Ground Operations G08-01-09-G01
8 d. 13 6 9
1 4 7 1
0 0 0 0
Restoration - WECO G08-01-09-R01
Education & Safety
G08-01-09-S01
1
10
5
Education & Safety 9 BLM - Needles Field Office General Criteria Education & Outreach
G08-01-09-S01
3
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
All Costs not eligible for match Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The Project does not provide direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant does not appropriately explain conference calls.
0
3
G08-01-12-S02
3
Previous Year Performance The Project provides direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project was developed with public input employing the following
0
3
Education & Outreach 10 BLM - Palm Springs South Coast Field Office General Criteria Restoration Dos Palmas Fence
G08-01-12-S02
11
2
0
6 G08-01-13-R01 7
0 2
3 1
Page 4 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
# 11
Applicant BLM - Redding Field Office
Project Title
Question In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation
Division Remarks Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
General Criteria 12 BLM - Ridgecrest Field Office General Criteria Development G08-01-15-D01
6
0
3
6 7
0 3
3 2
Education & Safety 13 BLM - Ukiah Field Office General Criteria 14 California Trail Users Coalition General Criteria
G08-01-15-S01
3
6
5
General Criteria Ground Operations Access Roads and Trails Maintenance (Sot SNF) Ground Operations Access Roads and Trails Maintenance (Sot SNF) Ground Operations Angeles National Forest Repaving Parking Lot Ground Operations Angeles National Forest Repaving Parking Lot Education & Safety New & Updates for NF&BLM Area Trail Maps Education & Safety New & Updates for NF&BLM Area Trail Maps
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. For Applicant's OHV grant Projects which reached the end of the Project performance period within the last two years. the percentage of all deliverables accomplished In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
0
3
5
2
Incorrect response. This is a first time applicant.
0
2
First time applicant.
G08-04-06-G01
3
The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by The Project will utilize partnerships to successfully accomplish the Project. The number of partner organizations that will participate in the Project are
13
12
Applicant failed to address multi-use.
G08-04-06-G01
5
4
3
Applicant included itself as a partner. Applicant failed to appropriately describe how the failure to fund project will lead to loss of opportunity.
G08-04-06-G02
2
Failure to complete the Project would result in:
8
2
G08-04-06-G02
4
The Project was developed with public input employing the following
2
0
Applicant failed to appropriately describe public meetings/conference calls.
G08-04-06-S01
3
Previous Year Performance
0
2
First time applicant. It appears that the project description and activities do not support the boxes that were checked.
G08-04-06-S01
7
The Project incorporates the following. clearly identifiable and/or measurable. elements Page 5 of 13
6
0
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question
Division Remarks Applicant failed to appropriately demonstrate that "hands on training" and "signage" were appropriate. The Project does not provide direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training
Education & Safety New & Updates for NF&BLM Area Trail Maps G08-04-06-S01 Education & Safety New & Updates for NF&BLM Area Trail Maps G08-04-06-S01 Education & Safety SotSNF OHV Host Program G08-04-06-S02 15 City of California City
10
The Project will utilize the following methods of education The Project provides direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training
8
4
11
2
0
3
General Criteria
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project will utilize partnerships to successfully accomplish the Project. The number of partner organizations that will participate in the Project are The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as
0
2
First time applicant. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to address all boxes checked. Applicant only addresses meetings with stakeholders.
0
3
Ground Operations
G08-03-26-G01
4
2
1
Ground Operations
G08-03-26-G01
5
4
1
Ground Operations
G08-03-26-G01
8
4
0
Education & Safety 16 City of Marysville
G08-03-26-S01
3
General Criteria Ground Operations G08-03-42-G01
6 4
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. Primary funding source for future development and operation cost will be The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as
0
3
Applicant used itself as a partner. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
0 2
2 1
First time applicant. Applicant only describes meetings with stakeholders. The project area does not provide for motorized access to non-motorized recreation. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has a Development project request in the 2008/09 grants cycle. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology.
Ground Operations 17 City of Porterville Parks and Leisure Services General Criteria Acquisition
G08-03-42-G01
9
6
0
6 G08-03-24-A01 4
0 5
3 0
Ground Operations
G08-03-24-G01
8
4
0
Page 6 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
Division Remarks The project area does not provide for motorized access to non-motorized recreation. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to appropriately describe the sensitive species protection. Applicant failed to appropriately demonstrate support for the project of maintaining OHV park. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. The project area does not provide for motorized access to non-motorized recreation.
Ground Operations 18 City of Tulare Recreation Parks and Library Department
G08-03-24-G01
9
2
0
General Criteria
6
0
3
Ground Operations
G08-03-04-G01
2
Failure to complete the Project would result in: The Project will utilize partnerships to successfully accomplish the Project. The number of partner organizations that will participate in the Project are The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as The Project improves and/or maintains facilities that provide motorized access to the following nonmotorized recreation opportunities
8
6
Ground Operations
G08-03-04-G01
5
4
0
Ground Operations
G08-03-04-G01
8
4
0
19
20
21
Ground Operations G08-03-04-G01 Desert Group Search and Rescue Education & Safety G08-04-09-S01 Volunteer. Inc. Desert Tortoise Preserve Committee. Inc. General Criteria Ground OperationsSigns G08-04-10-G02 El Dorado County Transportation Department General Criteria
9
2
0
3
6 3
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. Land Manager has developed a systematic methodology for evaluating soil conditions of its OHV Opportunities? Land Manager has developed methods to address soil issues?
0
2
First time applicant.
0 4
2 3
First time applicant. Applicant failed to appropriately describe multi-use. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The applicant has submitted a Soil Conservation Plan, therefore they have a systematic methodology for evaluating soil conditions. The applicant has submitted a Soil Conservation Plan, therefore they have methods to address soil issues.
6
0
3
General Criteria
12 a.
0
5
General Criteria Development Rubicon Trail Restroom Ellis Creek Crossing Area G08-03-06-D01
12 b.
0
5
7
The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation
3
2
Project improves support facilities, not OHV Opportunity.
Page 7 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question
Division Remarks
Ground Operations Rubicon Trail Ellis Creek Crossing Area G08-03-06-G01 Ground Operations Rubicon Trail Ellis Creek Crossing Area G08-03-06-G01 Education - Rubicon Trail Education/Public Outreach G08-03-06-S01 22 Friends of El Mirage
7
The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing
3
2
Applicant did not demonstrate maps as part of the project. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
8
The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as
4
0
3
General Criteria Ground Operations Trail Maintenance/Signag e G08-04-11-G02 23 24 Friends of Hope Valley Friends of Jawbone Education & Safety G08-04-12-S03
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
0
2
First time applicant.
7 3
The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
4 0
3 2
Applicant failed to appropriately explain "other" that was checked. First time applicant.
General Criteria Ground Operations Trail Maintenance/Annual Sustainment G08-04-13-G01 Education & Safety Electronic (LED) Message Center at Hwy 14 G08-04-13-S04 25 Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy General Criteria
6
0
2
First time applicant. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology.
8
The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as
4
0
3
6
26
National Park Service - Joshua Tree National Park Service - Mojave National Preserve
Restoration Education & Safety Desert Tortoise Outreach & Education
G08-04-17-R01
10
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The underlying problem that resulted in the need for the Restoration Project has been effectively addressed and resolved
0
2
First time applicant.
0
2
First time applicant. Applicant failed to appropriately explain the underlying problem for project.
3
0
G08-05-01-S01
3
27
General Criteria
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. Page 8 of 13
0
2
First time applicant.
0
2
First time applicant.
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question
Division Remarks Applicant checked "No" to OHV outreach efforts are accomplished through the Land Managers website. Section (b) is not applicable. Applicant failed to appropriately explain underlying problem. This project is not a Scientific Study. First time applicant.
General Criteria
9 b.
28 29
Rescue 3 Inc. Rubicon Trail Foundation
Restoration Restoration Education & Safety
G08-05-02-R01 G08-05-02-R01 G08-04-20-S01
10 9 3
General Criteria Ground Operations Ground Operations G08-04-22-G01 G08-04-22-G01
6 6 7
The Land Manager's website contains the following items The underlying problem that resulted in the need for the Restoration Project has been effectively addressed and resolved Scientific and cultural studies will Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project will avoid and/or minimize impact to natural and cultural resources by The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as Previous Year Performance
5
0
3 1 0
0 0 2
0 5 2
2 3 1
First time applicant. Explanation does not address special status species or cultural sites. Trail map is not part of the project. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. First time applicant. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Internet messaging/CDs, Advertising, Public relations/media, and Radio/TV does not appear to be supported in the project description. The project does not provide direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training. Zero points. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
Ground Operations Education & Safety 30 San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department San Bernardino National Forest Association Education & Safety Victor Valley
G08-04-22-G01 G08-04-22-S01
8 3
4 0
0 2
G08-03-15-S01
3
31
General Criteria
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
0
3
Education & Safety
G08-04-02-S01
3
Previous Year Performance
0
3
Education & Safety
G08-04-02-S01
10
The Project will utilize the following methods of education The Project provides direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
14
6
Education & Safety 32 Santa Clara County Parks and Recreation Department
G08-04-02-S01
11
2
0
General Criteria
6
0
3
Education & Safety
G08-03-19-S01
3
Previous Year Performance
0
3
Page 9 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
# 34
Applicant Stanislaus County Parks and Recreation Department
Project Title
Question In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation approved training courses are offered Previous Year Performance The Project addresses the following types of OHV Recreation In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
Division Remarks Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Applicant failed to explain public input prior to application. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology.
General Criteria Ground Operations Frank Raines G08-03-20-G01 Ground Operations La Grange G08-03-20-G02 Ground Operations La Grange G08-03-20-G02
6
0
3
8 4
4 2
0 0
8
4
0
35
Student Conservation Association General Criteria 6
0
2
First time applicant. Item selected does not match land manager's (BLM Ridgecrest) response. First time applicant. Hunting is not a type of OHV Recreation. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
36
Tread Lightly!. Inc.
General Criteria Education & Safety Tread Trainer G08-04-26-S01 Education & Safety Tread Trainer G08-04-26-S01
8 d. 3 5
1 0 6
0 2 5
37
USFS - Angeles National Forest General Criteria 6
0
3
38
USFS - Cleveland National Forest General Criteria 6
0
3
39
USFS - Eldorado National Forest General Criteria Mud Lake Trailhead Development G08-02-03-D01 6 7
0 3
3 2
40
USFS - HumboldtToiyabe National Forest General Criteria Development G08-02-04-D01 6 7
0 3
3 2
41
USFS - Inyo National Forest General Criteria 6
0
3
Page 10 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as The Project would sustain OHV Opportunity by The Project will avoid and/or minimize impact to natural and cultural resources by
Division Remarks The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Applicant does not appropriately explain erosion control features. Signage does not maintain physical barriers. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
Ground Operations and Maintenance Forest G08-02-05-G01 Ground Operations Route Signing G08-02-05-G03 Ground Operations Route Signing G08-02-05-G03
8 3 6
4 7 4
0 4 3
Education & Safety 42 USFS - Klamath National Forest General Criteria 43 USFS - Lassen National Forest
G08-02-05-S01
3
6
General Criteria Ground Operations High Lakes OHV Area Recreation Site Management G08-02-08-G01 44 USFS - Los Padres National Forest General Criteria Education & Safety Santa Lucia G08-02-09-S01 Education & Safety Mt Pinos G08-02-09-S02 Education & Safety Ojai/Santa Barbara G08-02-09-S03 45 USFS - Mendocino National Forest General Criteria Fouts Springs Water Development G08-02-10-D01 46 USFS - Plumas National Forest General Criteria Development Conklin Park G08-02-13-D01
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
0
3
0
3
7
6
The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
5
4
Maps not included in project description; response in "other" not applicable. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Reference document was not identified. Applicants response supports the three point selection.
0
3
3
Previous Year Performance
0
3
3
Previous Year Performance
0
3
3
6 7
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit.
0
3
0 3
3 2
0
3
2 c.
Cultural Resources
5
3
Page 11 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number 7 Applicant Score 3 Division Score 2
#
Applicant
Project Title
Question The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation
Division Remarks Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. Reference document not identified. Applicants response supports three points selection. Project improves support facilities. not OHV Opportunity. The forest is not completely fenced off. Bulletin board is a form of signage. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to appropriately explain "other" mark. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator.
Development Conklin Park G08-02-13-D01 Development Deanes Valley Development Deanes Valley Ground Operations Ground Operations 47 USFS - San Bernardino National Forest General Criteria Ground Operations 48 USFS - Sequoia National Forest General Criteria G08-02-14-G01
G08-02-13-D02 G08-02-13-D02 G08-02-13-G01 G08-02-13-G01
2 c. 7 6 7
6 7
6
Cultural Resources The Project is designed to sustain existing OHV Recreation The Project will avoid and/or minimize impact to natural and cultural resources by The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. Offsite impacts relative to the Project Area (e.g.. sound. fugitive dust. runoff) have been addressed:
5 3 7 5
3 2 2 4
0 5
3 4
0
3
Development
G08-02-15-D01
12
4
0
Education & Safety 49 USFS - Sierra National Forest General Criteria Ground Operations OHV/OSV High Sierra RD Education & Safety OHV/OSV High Sierra RD 50 USFS - Six Rivers National Forest General Criteria Ground Operations
G08-02-15-S01
3
6
Previous Year Performance In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as The Project provides direct support for delivery of ATV Safety Institute and/or Motorcycle Safety Foundation training In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project incorporates recycled materials by utilizing The Project makes substantial use of sustainable technologies such as
0
3
Applicant indicates a future action. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has not communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology. Explanation does not tell how the project was developed with public input. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to appropriately explain "other" mark. The description provided by applicant does not demonstrate substantial use of sustainable technology.
0
0
G08-02-17-G01
8
4
0
G08-02-17-S01
11
2
1
6 G08-02-18-G01 7
0 4
3 3
Ground Operations
G08-02-18-G01
8
4
0
Page 12 of 13
Factual Findings 2008/2009 Grants and Cooperative Agreements
Project Number Question Number Applicant Score Division Score
# 51
Applicant USFS - Stanislaus National Forest
Project Title
Question In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. In the previous year the Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator by phone. email or personal visit. The Project was developed with public input employing the following The Project will utilize partnerships to successfully accomplish the Project. The number of partner organizations that will participate in the Project are
Division Remarks Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant has been responsive and communicated effectively with the assigned OHMVR Grant Administrator. Applicant failed to connect public meetings and/or conference calls to this specific project. Applicant failed to appropriately discuss current partnerships with regard to this specific project.
General Criteria 52 USFS - Tahoe National Forest General Criteria
6
0
3
6
0
3
Ground Operations
G08-02-20-G01
4
2
0
Ground Operations
G08-02-20-G01
5
4
0
Page 13 of 13