NTSB - Board Meeting - Glenpool, Oklahoma

Click to download
Reviews
Shared by: NTSB
Stats
views:
39
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
6/19/2008
language:
English
pages:
0
1 Glenpool South Tank Farm Glenpool , Oklahoma April 7, 2003 Storage Tank Explosion and Fire ConocoPhillips Investigation Team and Support Staff • Rick Flint • Dr. Joseph Kolly, Nancy McAtee & Dr. Merritt Birky • Leslee Shumway • Frank Zakar • Robert Moore & Meg Athey Investigator-in-Charge Explosion and Fire SCADA and Control Systems Materials Laboratory Editors Estimated man hours for the investigation: 4,500 Parties to the Investigation • ConocoPhillips • Explorer Pipeline • Office of Pipeline Safety • Glenpool Fire Department North 9 8 7 12 Tank 11 Highway 75 eet t Str 131s North TT Tank 12 TT TT 7 T T 11 TT TT TT TT 8 TT TT 9 TT TT 138,00 volt power lines TT TT T N Explorer Pipeline Glenpool Tank Farm Explorer 24” line to ConocoPhillips 12” crude oil pipeline 30” line to tank 11 28” Explorer mainline from Texas 9 7 12 8 11 power lines ConocoPhillips Glenpool South Tank Farm Explorer and ConocoPhillips Tank Farms Location of 138,000 volt power lines Tank 11 Dike wall Pipeline overpressure protection equipment Fire picture here dike wall power poles Power lines Tank 11 Tank 7 Pipeline overpressure protection equipment Tank 7 Tank 11 Tank 8: damage from internal fire North 9 8 7 12 Tank 11 16 Safety Issues • Tank operations, including switch loading • The adequacy of emergency planning and emergency response by ConocoPhillips and American Electric Power • The adequacy of Federal regulations and industry standards for emergency planning Safety Issue #1 Tank operations, including switch loading, at the ConocoPhillips tank farm Switch Loading • Empty tank that previously contained gasoline was being filled with diesel • Hazards of switch loading pressure/vacuum vents in floating roof vent openings in fixed roof and shell bond wires internal floating roof roof support legs 10" diameter pontoons gasoline Flow sump 30” fill & drain pipe Tank 11 with the floating roof landed Tank Operations • Fill velocity and turbulence increase static charge • Diesel is a static charge accumulator • Increased risk of a static discharge inside tank 11 Tank Operations - Flammability • Tank operations with gasoline on April 4 to 7 created a flammable mixture inside the tank Gasoline in storage mechanical pressure/ vacuum vents in floating roof (closed) vent openings in tank roof and shell (always open) tank shell roof: floating roof support legs gasoline no flow 23 Gasoline removed (roof floating) closed gasoline roof: floating Flow 24 Gasoline removed (roof landed) open roof: landed gasoline gasoline Flow 25 Gasoline added (roof landed) roof: landed gasoline Flow 26 Gasoline added (roof floating) closed after roof floats roof: floating gasoline Flow 27 Gasoline removed (roof landed) roof: landed gasoline Flow 28 Tank empty closed roof: landed No flow 29 Diesel added (switch load) roof: landed diesel Flow 30 Conclusion All the conditions necessary for fuel vapor ignition were present in the storage tank at the time of the accident, and the explosion most likely occurred when a static discharge ignited a flammable fuelair mixture in the space between the surface of the diesel and the floating roof. The extensive damage to the tank is consistent with the flammable fuelair mixture above the floating roof contributing to the force of the explosion. 32 Safety Issue # 2 Emergency Response and Emergency Planning Emergency Response • Emergency response by American Electric Power • Failure of energized power lines and additional fire • Unsuccessful management of the electrical hazard Emergency Planning No coordinated emergency planning between facility operators Conclusions The American Electric Power responder did not coordinate his actions with the incident command staff, and American Electric Power did not take effective emergency action. Conclusions (Continued) Because ConocoPhillips Company and American Electric Power did not preplan their response to emergencies near the Glenpool South Tank Farm, the emergency response was unsuccessful in managing the electrical hazard caused by the tank explosion and fire. 38 Safety Issue #3 Federal Regulations and Industry Standards for Emergency Planning Federal Pipeline Regulations • Require operators to prepare an emergency plan • Emergency plan must include procedures for notifying appropriate fire, police and other public officials • No requirements to coordinate with electric utilities Industry Standards • American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) pipeline codes do not require pipeline operators to coordinate with electric utilities • Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) electrical safety code has no requirements for emergency response planning Conclusion Comprehensive, practical industry guidance for the preparation of emergency plans would help operators of electric systems respond effectively to emergencies involving their utilities. 43

Related docs
NTSB - Board Meeting - Flora, Mississippi
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
NTSB report on Concord plane crash
Views: 1869  |  Downloads: 1
NTSB - Board Meeting - FedEx 647
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 3
What Is the NTSB
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
NTSB - Board Meeting - Taki Tooo
Views: 31  |  Downloads: 0
Other docs by NTSB