Innovative Administration Systems For Vaccines
IOMAI
Transcutaneous Immunization: Vaccines Delivered Via a Patch
Gregory Glenn MD IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
• Focus: delivery of vaccines to the skin • In Gaithersburg, 53 employees
– Experienced management team – Preclinical, formulation, patch manufacture – Clinical testing, (2000 active patches placed)
IOMAI
IOMAI
Vaccination via a Skin Patch
• • • • • Scientific Rationale Human proof of concept Development strategy Patch technology Biodefense application
IOMAI
IOMAI
Fundamental Observation
• Adjuvants activate skin immune cells, enhance immune responses to vaccines • Potent adjuvants can be safely delivered via the skin • Antigens and adjuvants are readily delivered into the skin LT
IOMAI
Adjuvant
IOMAI
Transcutaneous Immunization: Antigen and Adjuvant Delivery via a Patch
Langerhans cells Vaccine Patch
Antigen + adjuvant
Epidermis
Migration
Dermis
Activated Langerhans cell w/ Flu antigen
Draining Lymph Node
Immune Response
IOMAI
Adjuvants Enhance Immunity in the Context of the Skin: Universal Finding
1.E+06 B
IOMAI
Influenza-Anti-NC IgG
1.E+05 36,034 Serum IgG Titer (EU) 25,845 1.E+04
1.E+03
1,433
1.E+02
9 ug HA no LT
Wet patch
9 ug HA + 4.5 ug LT
9 ug HA (IM)
IOMAI
Transcutaneous Immunization: Delivery of Different Types of Vaccines and Antigens
– Multivalent subunit vaccines • Trivalent split-virus influenza • ETEC colonization factors & toxin (CFA1, CS3, CS6, LT) • Conjugated multivalent polysaccharides, Hib • HIV • Anthrax (rPA) – Toxoid vaccines • Tetanus and diphtheria toxoids – Toxins - CT, LT, Exo A – Particles • Virosomal vaccines • Virus-like particles- human papilloma virus – Inactivated bacterial whole cells - H. pylori, ETEC – Live Viruses – DNA
IOMAI
IOMAI
ESTABLISHED SCIENTIFIC PARADIGM
Published by the American Society of Microbiology
Infection and Immunity
Transcutaneous Immunization with Bacterial ADP-Ribosylating Exotoxins, Subunits, and Unrelated Adjuvants Infect Immun 2000;68:5306
nature
Skin immunization made possible by cholera toxin Nature 1998;391:651
AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR MICROBIOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL WEEKLY JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
Journal of Virology
Transcutaneous immunization: T-cell responses and boosting of existing immunity Vaccine 2001;19:2701
accine V
Immunostimulant patch containing heat labile enterotoxin from E. coli enhances immune responses to injeccted influenza vaccine through activation of skin dendritic cells. J Virol 2003;77:5218
advanced
drug deliver
reviews
Transcutaneous immunization of domestic anim opportunities and challenges ADDR 2000;43:45
medicine
nature
Transcutaneous immunization: A human delivery strategy using a patch
IOMAI
Langerhans Cells
• Network of barrier immune cells
– Immune surveillance – Orchestrates immune response
• • • • •
High levels of co-stimulatory molecules/cytokine Antigen presentation results in T and B cell activation Cover 25% of human skin surface area, highly superficial Ideal targets for immune manipulation Activated by adjuvants delivered to the skin
LCs in situ
Human LC, 400x IOMAI
IOMAI
LT as Adjuvant
• • • • • • • • LT ( heat labile enterotoxin from E. coli) Readily produced at commercial scale Natural product/natural human exposure Long history of experimental use as adjuvant Demonstrated clinical activity as adjuvant on the skin Potent Safely used on the skin-P2DBPC Stable/stable in formulation
IOMAI
Naive A
1
FITC B
38
FITC / LT IOMAI 70 C
The Adjuvant LT Increases the Number and Activation State of Migrating LCs in the Lymph Node
FITC
D
CD11c
55
E
60
F
76
MHC Class II
G
38
H
22
I
67
CD86
Inguinal
Cell Count
Axillary K
3%
J
62%
Cervical L 0.6%
IOMAI
FITC
IOMAI
Clinical Proof of Principle
• Safe • Adjuvant effect • Delivery of large proteins possible
– Transcutaneous vs transdermal
• Relevance of preclinical animal data?
IOMAI
Human Antibody Responses to Colonization Factor IOMAI (rCS6) and LT: Critical role of the adjuvant, delivery of large molecules
10000
A
Anti-LT IgG
1000
B
Anti-LT IgA
1000 100 100 10 10
1
LT + CS6
CS6
1
LT + CS6
CS6
1000
C
Anti-CS6 IgG
1000
D
Anti-CS6 IgA
100
100
10
10
1
LT+ CS6
CS6
1
LT + CS6
CS6
Vaccine group
IOMAI
Safety and immunogenicity of a prototype enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine administered transcutaneously. Guerena-Burgueno F, Hall ER, Taylor DN, Cassels FJ, Scott DA, Wolf MK, Roberts ZJ, Nesterova GV, Alving CR, Glenn GM. Infect Immun 2002 Apr;70(4):1874-8
IOMAI
Gauze/Tegaderm “Wet” Patches
20000
Boost
Boost
Anti-LT IgG (ELISA Units)
15000
10000
Glenn et al Nature Medicine, Dec 2000
0 50 100 150 Days 200 250 300
5000
0
IOMAI
IOMAI
Conclusions
• Large molecules readily delivered in context of human skin
– LT 86kD – CS6 1,500 kD – Transdermals<0.5kD
• Adjuvant plays critical role for immunogenicity • Responses robust-equivalent to natural immunity generated by ETEC infection
IOMAI
IOMAI
Second Major Application
• Transcutaneous immunization (TCI)
– Adjuvant and antigen delivered together
• Immunostimulant patch-(LT IS Patch)
– LT alone in conjunction with injected vaccine
IOMAI
IOMAI
IS Patch: Immunostimulation Using an Adjuvant Patch with Injected Vaccine
Immunostimulant Patch
LT
Flu Vaccine Delivered by Needle
Activated LCs Migrate To the Draining LN
IOMAI
IOMAI
LT IS Patch for Influenza Split Virus Vaccine: Enhanced Immunnogenicity
Two id Injections 5 ug Trivalent Flu Vaccine (Serum IgG to Johannesburg B Strain)
1,000,000
p = .0005
p = .0002
208,929
p = .0036
184,424
Serum IgG Titer (log)
93,585 100,000
10,000
8,868
1,000
no LT
5 ug LT
25 ug LT
50 ug LT
LT patch Published in: Xabier et al, J. Virol, May 03
IOMAI
Phase IIa LT IS Patch in the Elderly-Enhanced Immunogenicity
Flu V002A Day 21 Seroconversion
100% 90% 80%
IOMAI
Young Elderly Eld/LT
HAI geomean fold rise
70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
New Caledonia
Panama
Shangdong
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
Making Products
IOMAI
LT Alone as Strategic Focus for Development of Skin Patches
• Delivery,Safety, Stability • LT alone applications
– IS Patch using LT alone with flu – LT ETEC immunogen, anti-toxin immunity
IOMAI
• Formulate manufacturable LT patches • Optimize using LT immune response readout • Leading to Patches with LT and 2nd antigen)
– LT+Anthrax – LT+Flu –IOMAI
Protein in Adhesive Patch
IOMAI Backing
Matrix with LT
Release Liner
IOMAI Patch Systems are: - Small and Thin - Comfortable To Wear - Readily Manufactured
IOMAI
IOMAI Protein in adhesive Patches Stabilize LT: Results for % Label Claim for PIA Patch
150
125
Upper Limit % Label Claim
% Label Claim (Dose/Unit Area)
100
75
50
25
1 Yr Real Time Stability at 5C Degradation Studies Suggest Multi-year 5C Stability Potential for RT Stability Lower Limit % Label Claim -Dry -Stabilizing excipients -LT Robust
0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Time (Months)
Patches were stored at 5 oC and sampled according a written stability protocol. SE-HPLC analysis was performed at the indicated time points. Patches were extracted with 200 mM NaPi for 1.5 hours. Supernatants were then analyzed for LT and aggregate content with G2000 SWxl size exclusion column on a Agilent 1100 HPLC System with a DAD detector set to 220 nm. The mobile phase was 200 mM NaPi with a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. No notable degradation was detected at 8 months.
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI Step 1-Hydration and SC Disruption
Untreated SC
Hydration
Disrupted
IOMAI
IOMAI Effect of Human Stratum Corneum Disruption: Using LT Patches-anti-LT IgG as readout
90
LT IgG Fold Increase Over Day 0
80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0
50µg Hydration 50µg Tape-strip 50µg Pumice 50µg Emery
Day 21 Day 42
400µg Hydration
Figure 1: LT IgG response after one and two doses in NLT105 – Eight subjects per group were pretreated with the indicated methods as described, then vaccinated with 50µg or 400µg LT on Day 0 and Day 21. LT IgG ELISA was run on sera from Day 0, 21, and 42, reported as fold increase of relative ELISA units.
From: Expert Review of Vaccines 2:253-267, April, 2003
IOMAI
Consistent Responses to Single Application of LT in Protein in Adhesive Patches in the Elderly
Surrogate for Delivery Anti-LT IgG
IOMAI
FLA102
45/Emery
n= 8
Fold Rise 4.8
% seroconversion 88%
FLA201a LT 45µg/Emery Placebo/Emery
100 100
4.9 1.0
76% 0%
SLA103
45µg/Emery 45µg/Buffer/IPA
40 20
3.3 3.0
67% 70%
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
Development Strategy
• LT alone applications
– Phase II evaluation
• Superflu • ETEC
Epidermis
Immunostimulant Patch LT Flu Vaccine Delivered by Needle
Flu V002A Day 21 Seroconversion
100%
Vaccine Patch
Langerhans cells
HAI geomean fold rise
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%
Young Elderly Eld/LT
LT+Ag
Migration Draining Lymph Node Immune Response
LT Specific ASC Responses
New Caledonia
Panama
Shangdong
Count / 10 cells
6
• TCI-adjuvant and antigen
– Anthrax – Flupatch
140 Grp 4 IgG 120 100 80 Grp 5 IgG Grp 4 IgA Grp 5 IgA
60 40 20 0 Day 0 Day 9 Day 23
IOMAI
TCI Anthrax Vaccine
• • • • Spore forming, gram+ rod Inhalation anthrax 90% fatal Toxin-PA component binds PA antibodies protective
IOMAI
• • • •
Anthrax vaccine by TCI rPA as antigen LT as adjuvant Delivered together
IOMAI
IOMAI
Transcutaneous Immunization with rPA and LTAdjuvant Elicit Anthrax Toxin Neutralizing Antibodies
B. anthracis toxin neutralizing antibody 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0 LT (ug) rPA (ug)
IOMAI
Toxin Neutralizing Titer (ED50)
Transcutaneous Immunization IM (rPA/alum)
20 20
4 20
2 20
0.4 20
0 20
20 0
10
WRAIR/IOMAI
IOMAI
Protection Against Inhalation Spore Challenge
Group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 No. of AJ mice 10 10 2 8 10 10 10 Vaccination (TCI) µ µ LT* (µg) rPA* (µg) 20 50 4 20 1 5 20 0 0 50 Alum 5 naïve Immunization Route TCI TCI TCI TCI TCI IM Challenge results Protection (%) 100 100 100 0 100 100 0
Immunized day 0, 14, and 28, challenged 3 wks after last dose
IOMAI/DSTL IOMAI
IOMAI Rabbits Immunized with a Protein in Adhesive Patch Containing LT and rPA
3 ds (d 0, 14, 28), TCI 2 wks post immunization
Anti-rPA IgG
1.0E+06 A 1.0E+05
Serum IgG Titer (EU)
Anthrax toxin neutralizing antibody 1,400 1,200
83,468
p = 8.4-e10
TNA Titer (ED50)
1,000 800 600 400 200
1.0E+04
1.0E+03
915
1.0E+02
1.0E+01 150 ug rPA 150 ug rPA 50 ug LT
0 placebo 150 ug rPA 150 ug rPA 50 ug LT
Protocol 1198-107
IOMAI
IOMAI
Conclusions
• Clinical experience in 16 trials validate the safety and immunogenicity of TCI • Clinical experience is critical for exposing the viability of vaccine technologies • Vaccine delivery via a patch is feasible and task is to develop a commercial product
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
IOMAI
CORPORATION
IOMAI
Selected Publications
Needle-free skin patch vaccination method for anthrax, Matyas et al. Infect Immun (in press)
IOMAI
Transcutaneous immunization and immunostimulant strategies, Glenn et al. Immunol Allergy Clin N.A. (in press) Transcutaneous immunization and immunostimulant strategies: capitalizing on the immunocompetence of the skin, Glenn et al. Expert Rev Vaccines (2003);2:253 Immunostimulant patch containing heat labile enterotoxin from E. coli enhances immune responses to injected influenza vaccine through activation of skin dendritic cells, Guebre-Xabier et al. J Virol (2003);77:5218 Transcutaneous immunization, Glenn et al. New Generation Vaccines, 3rd Edition (Jan 2004) Safety and immunogenicity of a prototype enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli vaccine administered transcutaneously, Guerena-Burgueno et al. Infect Immun (2002);70:1874 Transcutaneous immunization using colonization factor and heat labile enterotoxin induces correlates of protective immunity for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Yu et al. Infect Immun (2002);70:1056 Transcutaneous immunization: T cell responses and boosting of existing immunity, Hammond et al. Vaccine (2001);19:2701 Transcutaneous immunization with bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins, subunits, and unrelated adjuvants.SchartonKersten Infect Immun (2000);68:5306 Transcutaneous immunization: a human vaccine delivery strategy using a patch, Glenn et al. Nat Med (2000):6:1403 Transcutaneous immunization: a new vaccine delivery strategy, Glenn et al. The Jordan Report 2000: Accelerated Development of Vaccines, 2000 Transcutaneous immunization with cholera toxin protects mice against lethal mucosal toxin challenge, Glenn et al. J Immunol (1998);161:3211 Skin immunization made possible by cholera toxin, Glenn et al. Nature (1998);391:851 IOMAI