Gil_Urban Evaluation Summary_ETHZ 2008

Reviews
Shared by: Jorge Gil
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
10
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
7/1/2009
language:
English
pages:
0
City Induction Evaluation Module Jorge Gil Faculty of Architecture, TU Lisbon Jose Pinto Duarte Faculty of Architecture, TU Lisbon Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 This research is part of the “City Induction” research project (PTDC/AUR/64384/2006) supported by the FCT and hosted by ICIST. The “City Induction” research project aims to develop an urban design framework at the scale of site planning consisting of three modules: formulation, generation and evaluation. The evaluation module will be driven by sustainable urban development principles, which determine the design analysis criteria and benchmarks, and it will be structured around selected urban spatial analysis, of which space syntax is a reference (Hillier and Hanson 1984). Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 2 1. Introduction Sustainable urban development and evaluation 2. Design and Analysis Evidence based design 3. Integration Strategic and performative urban design 4. Evaluation Analysis ≠ Evaluation 5. Visualisation Tools for thinking 6. Conclusions Discussion Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 3 1. Introduction Sustainable urban development approach Establish a dialogue among the stakeholders, trying to keep the process as transparent as possible, and with mechanisms to ensure that a strategic development vision is defined, an adequate urban programme is laid out, and a matching outcome is then reached that can be both quantitatively and qualitatively evaluated. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 4 1. Introduction Urban sustainability: - Environmental Social Economic - - “Urban form and land use Urban form and land use have an important influence over all the other factors. Appropriate mixed-use development can help ensure sustainable movement, accessibility, the effectiveness of recycling schemes, energy performance and adaptability to climate change.” Sustainable development – UK Eco-towns (c) Town and Country Planning Agency (TCPA) Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 5 1. Introduction Urban design evaluation: The urban designer, the one manipulating urban form, needs tools to ensure his solutions fall within the goal posts set by the existing mechanisms, like qualitative surveys, workshops and design guidelines, that capture requirements and set benchmarks. European Urban Index (c) Mediastadt Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 6 2. Design and Analysis Evidence based design: A group of experts gathers the evidence base, sometimes complex, against which option testing is performed. Evaluation framework aim: To bring analytical data directly into the design process to guarantee solutions within the sustainability requirements and ultimately reach the development vision. Solar analysis – Autodesk Ecotect (c) Autodesk Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 7 2. Design and Analysis - Design programme – requirements, values, urban patterns, subjects - Design solutions – form, space, relations, objects - Data and design analysis – properties, profiles, impacts, phenomena The urban design system components and interactions Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 8 2. Design and Analysis Analytical parameters derived from: - Public space configuration Urban structure - Analytical parameters relating to: - Environment Socio-economic factors Mobility - - (c) English Partnerships Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 9 3. Integration There is a natural tension between the design and the analytic domains and practice. Evaluation framework aim: To integrate selected analysis methodologies with simplified models into design tools that are suitable for working with urban design methodologies. CityCAD - http://www.holisticcity.co.uk/ Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 10 3. Integration Performative urban design: Which analytical techniques are more meaningful to the designer? What level of expertise is required to understand and manipulate the data? Which analytical techniques must stay in the hands of experts? - - - To what level can they afford to be simplified to fit the demands of the design process? - CityZoom - http://www.cityzoom.net/ Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 11 3. Integration Challenges identified so far: Common ontology between analysis and design Analytical models ≠ Design Models CAD Tools ≠ Urban Design tools Analysis Tools ≠ Urban Design tools - - - - Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 12 Need for a common ontology between analysis and design 3. Integration Urban Street Block Plot Profile Site CAD Surface Solid Block Hatch Line GIS Point Line Polygon Grid Simulation Mesh Thermal Zone Axial line Convex space Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 13 Analytical models ≠ Design models 3. Integration Analytical model Simple geometry Abstract representation Domain specific elements Very specific formats Interrelated information Generated by complex processes (less flexible to change without having to start all over again) Design model Complex with detailed geometry Rich descriptive representation conventions Generic and geometric elements Generic data formats Non-topological elements Flexible to changes by the designer Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 14 CAD Tools ≠ Urban Design tools 3. Integration CAD tool Detailed buildings Small area Representation of terrain Representation of built matter Urban design tool Complex with detailed geometry Vast area with many buildings Manipulation of infrastructure and terrain Representation of space Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 15 Analysis Tools ≠ Urban Design tools 3. Integration Analytical tool Quantitative output Display and management of large data sets Graphic and visual output limited in comparison to their quantitative output Expert knowledge to run Require statistical analysis and information visualisation skills to derive useful information from their output Urban design tool Qualitative output Rich descriptive representation conventions Design and legislation knowledge Flexible to changes by the designer Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 16 4. Evaluation Analysis ≠ Evaluation - Analytic results are simply numbers - The same analytical results can have positive or negative value depending on their context They acquire a value when placed within the whole evaluation framework against a solution and a program. - Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 17 4. Evaluation Urban design analysis results can be quite complex with large amounts of data that is difficult to interpret and translate into design decisions. Evaluation results should provide summary diagrams of the specific analytic parameters that originally take the form of charts, tables and maps. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 18 4. Evaluation Evaluation diagrams by Alvar Aalto of Baker House – Senior Dormitory for MIT (c) Alvar Aalto Foundation, Helsinki Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 19 4. Evaluation Evaluation diagrams by Alvar Aalto of Baker House – Senior Dormitory for MIT (c) Alvar Aalto Foundation, Helsinki Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 20 4. Evaluation Evaluation framework aim: Provide an interpretation of the analytical results; test them against regulations, development targets, and quality and sustainability benchmarks; provide both quantitative and qualitative output. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 21 5. Visualisation Tools for thinking: Reach an understanding of the problem through interaction with meaningful and operational abstractions. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 22 5. Visualisation Evaluation process: The designer plays a central role in the process, responding to the programme requirements through intellectual understanding of the subject matter and direct manipulation of the object. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 23 5. Visualisation Evaluation framework aim: A design support system equipped with a graphical user interface to provide dynamic visualisations of complex urban phenomena and feedback on the fitness of the design solutions. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 24 6. Conclusions - Urban development process is getting more complex in search for sustainability involving more stakeholders, guidelines and regulations Evidence based design brings analysis into the urban design process Tools to address the challenges of integrating the two domains Evaluation as translation of complex data into summary diagrams and indices Selection of appropriate visualisation and interaction models - - - - This is the nature of the challenge: The development of an urban design evaluation framework that integrates the technicalities of spatial urban analysis, the complexities of urban simulation, and the specificities of urban design to provide the designer with the creative means to explore quality urban design solutions. Workshop “New Methods in Urban Simulation” ETH Zurich, 22 November 2008 City Induction Evaluation Module 25

Related docs
Gil_Urban Evaluation Abstract_ETHZ 2008
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
premium docs
Other docs by Jorge Gil
Proceedings_Workshop_1_DCC08_2008
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
JorgeGil_PhD Proposal_2008
Views: 19  |  Downloads: 2
JorgeGil_PhD Proposal Diagrams_2009
Views: 39  |  Downloads: 0
JorgeGil_CV_2008
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_Virtual Environments Essay_1999
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_Urban Evaluation Abstract_ETHZ 2008
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_Standard Application SmartGeometry_2008
Views: 8  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_MSc Thesis_appendix E_2000
Views: 6  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_MSc Thesis_appendix D_2000
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_MSc Thesis_appendix C_2000
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_MSc Thesis_appendix B_2000
Views: 2  |  Downloads: 0
Gil_MSc Thesis_appendix A_2000
Views: 9  |  Downloads: 0