Get documents about "Presentation_CZ
Document Sample
4rth meeting of SAVE II project
”REGIONAL ACTION PLAN FOR
PROMOTION OF COMBINED HEAT AND
POWER PRODUCTION IN THE NEISSE-
NISA-NYSA EUROREGION”
Zittau, 22-23 January 2002
Prague, 21 and 24 January 2002
SRC International CS
AGENDA OF PROJECT TEAM MEETING (1)
22-24 Jannuary
This time the meeting is split into the following parts:
Monitoring of the project by Mr. Michael Mente, European Commission,
Directorate General for Energy and Transport, DG TREN, Unit Energy
Management D 3
Regular project team meeting (23 January)
Site visit to the Liberec Incineration Plant and smalll-sized CHP
installation (22 January)
Common project team dinner in Liberec (22 January)
Bilateral meeting of SRC and ECN on the next steps (24 January)
Follow up activities
2
SRC International CS
AGENDA OF PROJECT TEAM MEETING (2)
Tuesday, 22nd Jannuary, morning
9:00 - 9:10 Opening the meeting (representative of hosting institution)
9:10 - 9:20 Agenda, organisational issues of the project (Miroslav Maly)
Monitoring part of the project
9:10 - 9:20 Short presentation of the project (Miroslav Maly):
9:20 - 9:30 Short presentation of the Project team (members of the team)
9:30 - 9:35 Objectives of the project (Miroslav Maly)
9:35 - 9:40 Intermediate Report – brief introduction to individual phases (Maly)
9:40 - 9:55 Outputs of the Phase 2 and 3 for Germany (Mr. Bothmer)
9:55 - 10:10 Outputs of the Phase 2 and 3 for Poland (Mr. Rajkiewicz)
10:10 - 10:25 Outputs of the Phase 2 and 3 for Czech Republic (Mr. Maly)
10:25 - 10:35 Brief comments on outcomes of Phase 2 and 3 (Mr. Maly)
10:35 - 10:45 Sensitive analyses of typical CHP installations (Mr. Jakubes)
10:45 - 10:50 Further steps (Miroslav Maly)
10: 50 - 11:00 Coffee Break
11:00 – 12:30 Discussion
12.30 – 13.30 Lunch break
3
SRC International CS
AGENDA OF PROJECT TEAM MEETING (3)
Tuesday, 22nd Jannuary, afternoon
Regular part of the project team meeting
13:30 - 13:45 Outcomes of the Phase 4 for Germany (Dietmar Bothmer)
13:45 - 14:00 Outcomes of the Phase 4 for Poland (Andrzej Rajkiewicz)
14:00 – 14:15 Outcomes of the Phase 4 for Czech Republic (Vladimira Henelova)
14:15 – 14:30 Comments to the outcomes of the Phase 4 (Vladimira Henelova)
14:30 – 14:45 Discussion to Phase 4 and conclusions (Vladimira Henelova)
14:45 - 15:00 Tea Break
Site visit within the project
15:00 – 17:30 Site visit to the Liberec Incineration Plant (30 km from
Zittau) to discuss possibilities of CHP implementation in incineration
plants
18:00 - 19:30 Common dinner (Hotel and brewery U Jezirka, Liberec)
with possible continuation of the discussion and site visit of the brewery
(for those willing to do so)
4
SRC International CS
AGENDA OF PROJECT TEAM MEETING (4)
Tuesday, 23rd January, morning
Continuation of the regular part of the project team meeting
9:00 - 9:10 Opening the second day of the meeting and agenda (Miroslav Maly)
9:10 - 9:40 Current statues of the work on the Phase 5 (Mark van Wees)
9:20 - 10:45 Discussion by individual part of the Action Plan
10:45 - 11:00 Coffee Break
11:00 – 11:30 Continuation of the discussion on the Action Plan
11:30 – 12:00 Preparation of 2nd country workshops and training, final seminar
12:00 – 12:30 Draft Final Report outline
12:30 – 13:00 Dissemination activities – web-site, conferences, journals
13:00 Closing the official part of the meeting (Miroslav Maly)
Afternoon: continuation of the discussion among partners based the needs and availability
of the members of the team
5
SRC International CS
AGENDA OF PROJECT TEAM MEETING (5)
Tuesday, 24th January
Only bilateral discussion of the Project Manager with Mr. Mark van Wees
and Mr. Michael ten Donkelaar, representatives of ECN, on the next steps
for finalisation of the Action Plan
Location: SRC International CS office, Prague
6
SRC International CS
Organisational issues of the project
1. Payment
Money for intermediate payment received form Brussels.
Money were transferred to all partners
2. Phase 2 and 3 finalised (Interim Report)
Interim Report sent to Brussels in early November for approval
7
SRC International CS
Nisa-Nysa-Niesse Eureoregion
8
SRC International CS
Basic statistical data on Euroregion
The Neisse-Nisa-Nysa Euro-region is a union of three bordering
countries in the heart of Europe including the adjoining areas of the Polish
Republic, the Czech Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany.
The Neisse-Nisa-Nysa Euroregion is the first cross-border collaboration
region in CEECs, which has been officially funded in December 1991.
The total territory of the Euroregion is 11,366 km2, of which 3,444 km2
(30.3%) is in Poland, 3,545 km2 (31.2%) is in the Czech Republic and 4,377
km2 (38.5%) in Germany.
The total population of the Euroregion is 1,610 thousand inhabitants, of
which 437 thousand (27.1%) lives in Poland, 479 thousand (29.8%) is in the
Czech Republic and 694 thousand (43.1%) in Germany.
The Euroregion is a part of the Black Triangle Region in Europe, where a
very high level of natural resources utilisation and high level of pollution of
the environment has resulted in very serious health problems for the
population, and high damage of the environment and infrastructure.
9
SRC International CS
Presentation of the project team
Project coordinator
Project coordinator General support
General support
SRC International CS sro
SRC International CS sro Netherlands Energy Research
Netherlands Energy Research
Prague
Prague Foundation ECN
Foundation ECN
Coordinator Germany / General support Coordinator Czech Republic Coordinator Poland / dissemination Poland
Coordinator Germany / General support Coordinator Czech Republic Coordinator Poland / dissemination Poland
IEEP March Consulting sro NECA
IEEP March Consulting sro NECA
Support/dissemination Czech Rep.
Support/dissemination Czech Rep. Technical support Czech Rep
Technical support Czech Rep
Czech Energy Agency
Czech Energy Agency Power Service
Power Service
10
SRC International CS
Objectives of the Project
Project proposal identified the following major objective:
To support the regional authorities and associations in the Neisse-Nisa-
Nysa Euroregion in the promotion of combined heat and power
production.
The Inception Report specified:
This will be achieved by developing a regional transboundary Action
Plan for promotion of CHP in the Region
11
SRC International CS
Proposed content of the Regional CHP Action Plan(s)
1. Identification of potential of CHP and priority sectors
2. Identification of barriers for CHP
3. Recommendations for the regional institutional framework
4. Recommendations for transboundary co-operation and co-
operation with national authorities
5. Financing of CHP projects
6. Identification of regional promotion actions, including
recommendations for implementation.
12
SRC International CS
Time schedule of the Project
Year 2001 2002
Item \ month 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04
Phase 1. Inception phase
Phase 2: Analysis of major
barriers
Phase 3: Analysis of CHP and
DH potential
Phase 4: Identification
financing sources
Phase 5: Drafting Action Plan
Phase 6: Dissemination of
information
Reporting X X X
Project meetings X X X
Workshops X X
Regional seminars X
13
SRC International CS
Dissemination time schedule
Year 2001 2002
Item \ month 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04
On job training
Training of authorities
Workshops
Final seminar
Web-sites
Papers
14
SRC International CS
Summary of Project phases (1)
Indicators or “Milestones” for DURATION OF
TASK DESCRIPTION
the completion of the task PHASE
Phase 1: Inception phase Kick-off meeting 1 month (04/2001)
Phase 2: Analysis of legal,
administrative and regulatory
barriers to the expansion of CHP and 2 months
Paper
district heating and assessment of (05-06/2001)
possible impact of the new
liberalised energy markets
Project team meeting
Phase 3: Analysis of the available 4 months
CHP and district heating potentials Interim Report
and technology options (07-10/2001)
National workshops
15
SRC International CS
Summary of Project phases (2)
Indicators or “Milestones” for DURATION OF
TASK DESCRIPTION
the completion of the task PHASE
Phase 4: Analysis of possible 1 month
sources of financing CHP and district Paper
heating (11/2001)
Project team meeting
Phase 5: Drafting Action Plan for
promotion of CHP and district Draft Final Report 3 months
heating in the Neisse-Nisa-Nysa Draft Regional CHP Action Plan (12/2001-02/2002)
Euroregion
National workshops
Final Report
Phase 6: Dissemination of results 2 months
obtained from the action to relevant Final Regional CHP Action Plan
organisations within each country (03-04/2002)
3 National seminars
3 reports
Total 3 project team meetings 13 months
6 workshops, 3 seminars
16
SRC International CS
Intermediate Report - introduction to individual
Project phases
Phase 1: Inception Phase
Activities: specification of the proposal, identification of beneficiaries
Milestones - 2 days kick-off meeting in Liberec, Inception Report
Duration - 1 month (04/2001)
Phase 2: Analysis of legal, administrative and regulatory barriers to the
expansion of CHP and district heating, and assessment of possible
impact of the new liberalised energy markets
Activities: 5 tasks. Project team meeting in Zittau (additional),
Milestones - Working paper
Duration - 2 months (05-06/2001)
Phase 3: Analysis of available CHP potential and technology options
Activities: 6 tasks
Milestones - Project team meeting in Jelenia Gora, 3 workshops, Interim Report
Duration - 4 months (07-10/2001)
17
SRC International CS
Inception Phase
Phase 1
Responsibility: SRC International CS
SRC International CS
Inception phase - identification of beneficiaries
During the Inception Phase, the project objectives were defined, a
detailed working programme was set up, and the Inception Report
was elaborated and submitted to the European Commission.
Major activities within the Inception phase were as follows:
The kick-off meeting;
Identification of project beneficiaries and meetings with them;
Discussion of priorities and organisational issues of the project; and
Drafting the Inception Report.
Identified beneficiaries:
Community associations of municipalities, cities and regions in the three national
members of the Euroregion;
Individual regional, city and village municipalities;
Regional development agencies; and
19 Government energy agencies. SRC International CS
Analysis of legal, administrative and
regulatory barriers to the expansion of
CHP and district heating, and
assessment of possible impact of the
new liberalised energy markets
Phase 2
Responsibility: SRC International CS
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
SRC/March (Czech Republic)
SRC International CS
Specification of activities within the Phase 2
Task 1: Collection and analysis of present legislative and regulatory framework
information, comparison to EU practice, (Germany, Netherlands, EC regulations).
Assessment of their level of harmonisation to international treaties. Existing studies in
this field will be used as much as possible.
Task 2: Research and analysis of organisational solutions currently operating / under
preparation (including ownership structure) in heat and electricity supply sectors.
Discussion of the key problems.
Task 3: Identification of main bodies responsible for heat supply sector (including
regulatory) activity, administrative procedures (licensing, construction permissions) on
national and regional levels. Comparison to the EU practice.
Task 4: Proposals for transparent administrative procedures both for licensing of
entrepreneurs in this field and for construction permission.
Task 5: Analysis of regulations covering the existing pricing of electricity and heat.
Recommendations for future actions in this field.
Milestones - Paper, Project team meeting in Zittau
Duration - 2 months (05-06/2001)
21
SRC International CS
Analysis of the available CHP
potentials and technology options
Phase 3
Responsibility: SRC International CS
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
SRC/March/PowerService (Czech Republic)
SRC International CS
Specification of activities within the Phase 3
AIM: not to analyse a very accurate CHP potential but the following issues:
Rough estimation of technical potential of CHP by sector/site and by
technology option.
Analysis of recently successful/unsuccessful CHP projects and also
projects which failed
Identification of few pilot actions/projects in key sectors
Simulation of the impact of new legal, administrative and regulatory
systems and market opening on the economic potential of CHP
Description of energy planning and project development processes,
including major barriers to implementation of concrete project.
Draft of chapters 3 and 4 of the Action Plan (role of
municipalities/utilities promotions CHP and possible actions).
The methodology applied to analyse the CHP potential - combination of
top-down and bottom-up approach. Top-down is the identification of
potential on the basis of the regional analysis. Bottom-up is on the basis of
individual (potential) projects.
23Milestones - Interim Report, Project team meeting in Jelenia Gora, 3 workshops
SRC International CS
Duration - 4 months (07-10/2001)
Euroregion Nisa-Nysa-Neisse
CZ PL D
Selection of basic statistical units for analysis
of CHP and DH potentials
Collection of basic statistical data, data about already installed CHP and DH Evaluation of implemented
sources and possible future plans, implemented CHP projects CHP projects
Definition of criteria for evaluation of potential
CHP applications
Analysis of
Evaluation and update of collected data according to the defined
criteria
CHP
Definition of typical technological solutions of
potentials
CHP (”model” CHP projects)
Allocation of ”model” CHP projects to each statistical unit matching the criteria
Comparative CHP case
CHP technical potential study for selected ”model”
CHP project
Definition of economic evaluation
methodology
CHP economic potential
24
SRC International CS
Czech Part of the Euroregion
25
SRC International CS
Current situation in energy supply, CHP and district
heating (1)
Territory: 3 566 km2
Population 481 624
1 region: Liberec Region (established on 1 January 2001)
5 districts: Liberec, Jablonec, Semily, Česká Lípa, Děčín (part)
Largest city: Liberec, 102 000 inhabitants
Other large cities: district centres
Region is net energy importer of all energy sources (fuels, power),
except heat
Local primary energy sources: renewables (biomass, hydro, other
limited), municipal waste, uranium
Power supply: 2 regional power distribution companies, in some rural
areas not sufficient capacity and low voltage
Gas supply: 2 regional distribution companies, fast extension of gas
network in last few years, all major cities connected to high-pressure
26
gas network SRC International CS
Current situation in energy supply, CHP and district
heating (2)
District heating: large DH networks in all district centres and some
other cities (32 in total)
Large public CHP only in Liberec - 220 MWt and 12 MWel
Few old industrial medium-sized CHP plants
Incineration plant only in Liberec, 24 MWt + 2,5 MWe;
31 small CHP unit operated using natural gas and sewage gas (2
units), total capacity 9 MWt and 6,4 MWe.
Major fuels used in district heating:
coal (HOB, industrial CHP)
natural gas (small-sized CHP, HOB)
fuel oil (large CHP and HOB)
27
SRC International CS
Future plans in energy supply, CHP and district
heating
Electricity supply: strengthening of some lines
Gas supply: extension of distribution networks in large to medium
cities, nevertheless some parts of the region will be without gas
even in the future
Local energy sources: biomass use for DH and local heating
mostly in rural areas
District heating: no plans for extension of district heating,
improvement of energy efficiency (currently 60-90%)
Continuation of fuel switching in DH from coal and fuel oil to gas
and biomass
Some ideas for small- to medium-sized CHP but no final decisions
and no constructions
28
SRC International CS
Current policy, legal and institutional framework
Policy framework: State Energy Policy of January 2000
Legal framework:
Energy Act of January 2001
Energy Management Act of January 2001
Clean Air Act (revised version expected in 2002)
Pricing and Taxation Act, etc.
Institutional framework:
Ministry of the Industry and Trade (MIT) - authorisation
Ministry of the Environment (MoE)
Energy Regulatory Office (ERO) - licensing, Price Decrees
Operator of Power Market
Office for Protection of Economic Competition
Regional, district and municipal offices (Regional Planning and
29
Building Code) SRC International CS
Regional Energy Policy
Energy Management Act introduces the requirement of
development of regional energy policies for 14 regions, one of
which is the new established Liberec region (1st January 2001),
and for largest cities (regional centres).
Energy Management Act recommends to development
local/municipal energy policies based on regional policies.
Regional/local energy Policies should follow the standard
methodology given in the Decree to the Act.
No policy has been developed for the Liberec region by now.
30
SRC International CS
Energy Efficiency Regulation
Energy Management Act of January 2001
Chapter IV entitled " Measures to Enhance Efficient Use of
Energy" deals specifically with the ways to promote energy
efficiency such as minimum energy efficiency requirements,
energy audits, energy auditors and co-generation of heat and
power (CHP) with capacity of 5 MWt, 10 MWe (steam turbines), 2
MWe (gas turbine) and 0.8 MWe (gas engines).
Decree 150/2001 on minimal energy efficiency of power and heat
production, 12 April 2001
Decree 151/2001 on energy efficiency of heat distribution, 12 April
2001
Proposal of the Decree on energy efficiency of energy use in
buildings
31
SRC International CS
Main barriers for CHP and district heating (1)
Policy Framework
State Energy Policy does not specify any quantitative targets in
CHP
Energy Act does not meet requirements of the Energy Policy in
CHP promotion
Legal Framework
Missing Decrees on bay-back tariffs for power and heat from CHP
(new Price Decree of the Energy Regulatory Office)
Obligation to purchase power and heat from CHP may create
negative reaction on the market
Mandatory energy audit for assessment on efficiency of CHP
project may not an efficient tool
32
SRC International CS
Main barriers for CHP and district heating (2)
Financing
Barriers in economics of CHP schemes
Cost effectiveness of CHP installations is given by the share of total costs
for production and distribution of energy and revenues for sales
Internal rate of return is then low compared to other projects
Capital intensity is high compared to other heat solutions and thus lower
capital intensity with higher operational cost intensity is given priority
Barriers in capital availability and requirements
In-house capital is usually missing, mainly in case of municipalities
Private capital is difficult to involve (high interest rate, high transaction
costs, high risk perceived by the lender, etc.)
The commercial risk of unreliable revenues from electricity and heat sales
is high
Czech investors have low credit-worthiness
Limited public grant sources (State programme for energy savings)
33
SRC International CS
Main barriers for CHP and district heating (2)
Financing
Additional barriers
Complex and timely procedure of public procurement by local authorities
which makes difficulties for ESCOs.
In the governmental sector new financial rules allow for multiannual
financing. The institutions have not yet become familiar with the rules.
Need to be developed before ESCOs enter successfully this sector.
The rules for depreciation of equipment are not convenient for energy
technologies and make problems for new investments with high capital
cost.
A shortage of expertise exists to develop a bankable project proposal;
Investors have limited experience in working with foreign and
international financial institutions
Banks miss a long-term view on investment opportunities, well developed
energy concepts and proper project development (knowledge)
34
SRC International CS
Main barriers for CHP and district heating (3)
Knowledge, awareness and capability
In municipal CHP plants a lack of knowledge exists in operating
the plants . This is sometimes solved by contracting to external
organisations, or by selling the plant to a private owner.
Many potential users and possible investors are not aware of the
advantages of CHP, in particular of small-scale CHP.
At the same time, experience is lacking in dealing with proposals
for CHP investments.
In addition, smaller banks may not have specialised skills in
assessing the CHP project. This lack of experience leads to large
overhead costs for the development of small CHP projects. At the
same time, the need for external qualified assistance is
underestimated, as well as the necessity op proper project
35
development and its relevant costs.
SRC International CS
Conclusions and recommendations Phase 2
The Government should:
Eliminate price distortions between natural gas and electricity tariffs.
Lift the current price control for household tariffs under a determined ceiling
(price cap per square metre) to ensure that energy saving investments
(possibly by ESCo, EPC) are made for mutual benefits of operators and
customers.
Promote cost-effective cogeneration and metering at building level.
Reconsider the obligation to purchase electricity from CHP and setting
minimal bay-back tarrif
The regional and local municipalities should:
Development of Energy Policy and Regional Energy Efficiency/CHP Action
Plan
Make energy audits of existing DH networks, HOB and CHP plants
Consider possible implementation of CHP schemes where economically viable
36
SRC International CS
Czech part of ERN - Basic statistical data for
evaluation of CHP potential
- Health care - 11 hospitals, 3 large and medium health centres, 8 special
medical institutions, 2 balneological complexes
- Education sector - 127 basic schools, 82 secondary schools, 1 university,
31 student residences
- Accomodation - estimated more than 150 hotels and 200 pensions (102
+ 129 in 1996)
- Housing - 174 000 flats (68 000 in family houses, 104 000 in blocks of
flats) 49% connected to central/district heating
- Waste management - 17 landfills, 7 potentialy siutable for landfill gas
utilisation
- Swimming pools - 8 indoor swimming pools, 2 equipped with CHP
37
SRC International CS
Review of small CHP sources in the Czech part of
ERN
Waste water treatment 3
Swimming pools 3 Heat capacity
Social care centres 3 Power capacity
Industry 8
Hospitals 4
District heating 9
Municipal services 1
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
kW
38
SRC International CS
Review of small CHP sources in the Czech part of
ERN
Structure of installed capacity
0-50 kWe (8 installations)
50-250 kWe (17 installations)
250-1000 kWe (2 installations)
> 1000 kWe (4 installations)
Review of installed capacity by year of installation
3000
2500
2000
kWe
1500
1000
500
0
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
39
SRC International CS
Analysis of recent successful / failed CHP projects
All projects of recently implemented CHP units can be roughly
grouped in three categories by the level of their economic
performance:
Highly successful projects: swimming pools, waste water
treatment plants;
Successful projects: hospitals, social care centres, industry,
municipal services;
Problematic projects: district heating.
40
SRC International CS
Analysis of technical potential of small CHP in the
Czech part of ERN
1. Pre-selection of heat sources - availability of gas network in municipality
2. Allocation of heat sources into sectors
Hospitals / DH / Industry / Central heating - residential buildings /
Administrative buildings and schools / Other
3. Allocation of heat sources into two CHP potential scenarios
Lower scenario – recommended installation of CHP source -
installation of CHP is expected to contribute to increase of the
efficiency of the source - 320 sources.
Higher scenario – possible installation of CHP source - installation of
CHP unit is technically possible - 318 sources
4. Estimate of recommended installed capacity of CHP - based on calculated
capacity utilisation / type of source / expected share of CHP on annual peak
load
41
SRC International CS
Analysis of technical potential of small CHP in the
Czech part of ERN
Lower scenario - total 359,4 MWt, 239,6 MWe,
Higher scenario - total 585,1 MWt, 336,8 MWe,
200 000
180 000
160 000
140 000
120 000
kWe
100 000
80 000
60 000
40 000
20 000
0
army
industry
balneology
hotels
facilities
services
heating
education
business &
police
agriculture
social care
health care
district
sports
public
services
42
SRC International CS
Analysis of legal, administrative and
regulatory barriers to the expansion of
CHP and district heating
CHP potential and technology options
National presentations by:
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
SRC International CS
Comments to outcomes of
the Phase 2
SRC International CS
Item Germany Poland Czechia
Energy supply Sufficient local sources, competition, 8 No competition yet, net import of energy, No competition yet, 2 partly privatised
national/regional situation municipal distributors ongoing gasification distributors, net import of energy
Role of DH Extensive DH networks Extensive DH networks in cities Extensive networks
Role of CHP Past growth, mostly small CHP plants, Not very developed 1 large, many small and medium
currently no new projects (industry) CHP
Future plans Rehabilitation, no growth Rehabilitation of DH, new CHP No plans, some ideas
CHP policy Exists, driven by GHG emission reduction Long-term option No clear targets
Legal framework CHP upgrade law, certificates, energy No specific CHP legislation No specific CHP legislation
market
Energy market 1998 Energy Law 1997 Energy Act 2001 Energy Act
Energy efficiency Energy tax, RES priority law Act on Thermomodernisation Energy Management Act and Decrees
Environment protection Emission Act, TA luft Environment Protection Act Clean Air Act
Regulatory framework Avoided cost formula Justified cost formula ?Avoided cost formula?
Institutional Framework Federal level National Energy Regulatory Authority National Energy Regulatory Office
Role of Energy planning of municipal distributors Energy Planning and Investment Obligatory regional energy planning,
regions/municipalities programme – municipal level tentative municipal energy planning
Barriers Many Many Many
Policy framework Support to only existing and small-sized CHP is long-term option Missing, CHP is long-term option
CHP installations
Regulatory framework Not easier for CHP Only for small CHP 2 licences, authorisation
Institutional framework Regional EA is missing Regional EA is missing Regional EA is missing
Pricing, tariffs, taxation Will be improved soon Not clear yet, new ordinance expected Not clear yet, new ordinance expected
Financing Missing financing of CHP Limited support to some projects Limited support to some projects (CEA,
(Environmental fund, GEF) SEF)
Market conditions Need for reduction CHP technology price Low bay-back tarrifs, no clear future, Low bay-back tarrifs, no clear future,
to be competitive temporary power system overcapacity long-term power system overcapacity
Knowledge, awareness Knowledge missing in public and service Knowledge missing in public and service Knowledge missing in public and service
sector sector sector
Conclusions Support to CHP is necessary Support to CHP is necessary The role of CHP is underestimated
Recommendations Information, promotion, pricing and tariffs, Organisation of seminars, fairs, site visits Analyse the role of CHP and DH in
investment subsidies, regional energy in existing facilities, energy plans, pricing regional plans, pre-feasibility and
policy development and tariffs feasibility studies, awareness campaign
45
SRC International CS
Comments to outcomes of
the Phase 3
SRC International CS
Current situation in CHP by country
The total capacity of CHP sources differs considerably by each part of Euroregion.
Czech part of Euroregion
two large CHP - Liberec CHP plant (gas + oil fired, 220,0 MWt and 12,0 MWe) and
Liberec solid municipal waste incineration plant (24 MWt + 2,5 MWe);
31 small CHP unit operated using natural gas and sewage gas (2 units), total
capacity 9 MWt and 6,4 MWe.
German part of Euroregion
19 CHP units using natural gas and sewage gas (2 units), total capacity 31 MWt;
26 MWe
Polish part of Euroregion
two large hard coal-fired CHP plants supplying industrial consumers and district
heating networks: Kamienna Gora and Jelenia Gora;
two new CHP installations: chemical factory of Wizow (gas turbine- 4,1 MWe, 28
MWt) and Waste Water Treatment Plant in Jedrzychowice by Zgorzelec (2 gas engine
units - 127 kWe, 207 kWt each)
47
SRC International CS
Technical potential of CHP
Electric capacity Thermal capacity
Part of the Euroregion
MWe MWth
Germany 694,2 973,5
Poland 28,5 - 40,9 66,9 - 236,4
Czech Republic 141,6 - 279,2 194,8 - 377,7
The potential in German part is considerably higher, however, this
is given by the fact that decentralised CHP applications have been
estimated in residential buildings, while in the Czech and Polish
part, CHP units have been considered as additional sources to
existing district heating sources.
48
SRC International CS
Analysis of CHP technology options
and CHP economic potential
SRC International CS
Further steps and discussion
Economic potential by country
Analysis of various sources of financing and the impact
on the technical/economic potential
Comparison of the situation among countries
Recommendations for the CHP promotion policy
measures for the Action Plan
50
SRC International CS
Analysis of possible sources of
financing CHP
Phase 4
Responsibility: March Consulting
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
March/ SRC (Czech Republic)
SRC International CS
Introduction
Availability of financing sources seems to be a crucial barrier for
many CHP and district heating projects in most of countries. Major
barriers and possible sources of financing will be analysed and
recommendations will be given in this field. The following financing
sources will be analysed: national/international grant financing,
ESCOs, project financing, commercial loans, etc.
Methodology for Phase 4: March Consulting
Milestones - Paper
Duration - 1 months (11/2001)
52
SRC International CS
Drafting the Action Plan for promotion
of CHP in the Region
Phase 5
Responsibility: ECN
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
SRC/ March (Czech Republic)
SRC International CS
Introduction (1)
Inception Report stated:
The proposal of the Action Plan for promotion of CHP and district heating
in the Neisse-Nisa-Nysa Euroregion will be developed ready for the
implementation by regional associations and administration, local
municipalities, energy utilities, industries and other independent power
and heat producers, financiers, technology producers, project developers,
etc.
The Action Plan will be based on results of previous tasks and would
include the following major chapters:
Chapter 1: Brief review of the current situation in CHP and district
heating and the impact of legal, administrative a regulatory framework
changes, privatisation and opening energy market;
Chapter 2: Potential for extension of CHP and district heating and
impacts on the environment and major barriers to this extension;
54
SRC International CS
Introduction (2)
Chapter 3: The role of national and regional authorities in promotion of
CHP and district heating and the list of possible actions in this field;
Chapter 4: The role of energy utilities and independent power and heat
producers in promotion of CHP and the list of possible actions in this
field;
Chapter 5: The system of financing of district heating and CHP; and
Chapter 6: Evaluation of social, economic and environmental benefits of
the Action Plan implementation.
The content of the Action Plan will be further discussed and
adjusted, if needed, during the third project team meeting when
the outputs of the Phase 2-3 are available and after the discussion
with beneficiaries and other stakeholders (e.g., energy utilities).
Output of the Phase 5: Draft Interim Report, Action Plan
55
SRC International CS
Time schedule of the Action Plan finalisation
11 January - final deadline for inputs to Action Plan from al partners (partners)
15 January - distribution of more advanced version to all partners for
discussion and comments (ECN)
23 January - discussion of AP during the project team meeting (all)
by 20 February - discussing draft AP within the second regional Workshop
(national partners)
by 28 February - implementation of comments from the Workshop to the draft
AP (ECN, SRC)
by 5 March - last but one version of the Action Plant disseminated among
partners for discussion (ECN, SRC)
by 15 March - finalisation of the Action Plan (ECN, SRC)
by 30 March - translation to national languages and dissemination to stakeholders
in regions (national partners)
by 15 April - Seminar with presentation of the Action Plan (to be decided)
by 20 April - implementation of last comments from the Seminar (SRC/ECN)
by 25 April - Final version of AP and Report, closing the project
56
SRC International CS
Dissemination of results and the
Action Plan for promotion of CHP in
the Region
Phase 6
Responsibility: SRC International CS
IEEP (Germany)
NECA (Poland)
SRC/ March/Power/CEA (Czech Republic)
SRC International CS
Review of dissemination activities (1)
Proposed dissemination activities
Web site
Workshops and seminars
Training of selected staff of the regional authorities/local
municipalities who will be responsible for future implementation of
the Action Plans
Papers with the summary of the project outputs in journals and
presenting them on conferences, both in the EU and in the Czech
Republic, Germany and Poland on national and/or regional levels.
58
SRC International CS
Dissemination time schedule
Year 2001 2002
Item \ month 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04
On job training
Training of authorities
Workshops
Final seminar
Web-sites
Papers
59
SRC International CS
Performed dissemination activities (1)
Project Web Site
The common Web site of the project was established at the address
http://www.srci.cz/nisa/ and is maintained and updated.
Project reports and the presentations and documents from project meetings
as well as from the workshop are available for download.
60
SRC International CS
Performed dissemination activities (2)
Workshops
The workshops are important component of the dissemination part of the project.
The dissemination started with national workshops, in which representatives of
individual target groups participated. The major goal of the workshops is to publicize
the project, discuss the major barriers to a wider use of CHP and district heating in
order to get the feedback from future implementing authorities and users.
Comments/recommendations from participants of the workshops are used to prepare
the final proposals of the Action Plans, which will be presented at the regional seminars
at the end of the project.
So far, three national workshops have been organised:
1st Polish national workshop - 8 October 2001, Jelenia Gora, office of the Nysa
Euroregion
1st Czech national workshop - 11 October 2001, Liberec, Liberec Exhibition Centre,
pavilion I
1st German national workshop - 26 October, Zittau, Hochschule Zittau/Goerlitz,
61
SRC International CS
Performed dissemination activities (3)
Training
The dissemination of results will also be done through training of selected
staff of the regional authorities/local municipalities who will be responsible
for future implementation of the Action Plans. For this training the training
materials will also be prepared. Additionally the on-job training is proposed
through the staff's of the regional authorities/local municipalities’ involvement
in development of the Action Plans.
During the 1st national workshop the training was provided in the following
fields:
EU energy legislation
Situation of CHP in liberalised energy market.
Papers
62
SRC International CS
Proposed dissemination activities (1)
Web site
Update of the current web site
Development of the contribution to the Web sites of the national
administrations of Nisa-Nysa-Nisse Eureoregion
Workshops
Three national workshops will be organised by end February to discuss the first draft of
the Action Plan with the following following agenda:
Brief presentation of the draft AP
Discussion of the AP
Proposal of major implementation activities
Participants: 5-10 people, major potential AP beneficiaries
63
SRC International CS
Proposed dissemination activities (2)
Training
During the 2nd national workshop the training will be provided in the
following tentative fields:
Regional energy planning
CHP promotion instruments/measures on the regional level
Papers
One common seminar will be organised in mid April to present/discuss the advanced
draft of the Action Plan with the following agenda:
Brief presentation of the draft AP
Discussion of the AP
Proposal of major implementation activities
64
SRC International CS
Proposed dissemination activities (3)
Seminar
One common seminar to present/discuss the advanced draft of the Action Plan
Proposed agenda:
Brief presentation of the current EU policy, CHP situation etc.
Brief presentation of the draft AP by coutry
Discussion of the AP and CHP policy on the national and regional levels
Proposal of major implementation activities for promotion of energy efficiency/CHP
Proposed date: mid April 2002 (period 9-11 April, to be agreed)
Time: 10 am - 3 p.m. (with lunch break)
Place: Liberec
Sponsorship: Nisa-Nysa_Niesse Euroregion
Number of participants: 30-40 in total, about 10 from each country
By 25 January short notice to be sent to the administration of the Euroregion to be
presented to the Council on February 8.
65
SRC International CS
Next meeting
Date:
mid April during the Seminar
Place
Liberec, Czech Republic
Agenda
preparation for the Seminar
discussion of the results of the Seminar
discussion of the Final Draft Report
other project outcomes (web-site, papers, etc.)
66
SRC International CS
Brief discussion of the next steps
Time schedule of the project
Year 2001 2002
Item \ month 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 01 02 03 04
Phase 1. Inception phase
Phase 2: Analysis of major
barriers
Phase 3: Analysis of CHP and
DH potential
Phase 4: Identification
financing sources
Phase 5: Drafting Action Plan
Phase 6: Dissemination of
information
Reporting X X X
Project meetings X X X
Workshops X X
Regional seminars X
67
SRC International CS
Follow up activities
Ongoing SAVE programme activities
Frydlant Energy Plan
New SAVE programme call for proposals - deadline 3 April 2002
SAVE Energy Agencies in associated countries (CR + Poland) with
the following partners: Goerlitz SAVE Energy Agency (D), Graz
Energy Agency (A), Berlin Energy Agency (D), ECN (NL)
Liberec Region Energy Plan / Polish DH Plan
68
SRC International CS
