New Public Management Integrity
W
Description
New Public Management Integrity document sample
Document Sample


New Public Management
Anwar Shah,
Program Leader, Public Sector Governance, World Bank Institute
ashah@worldbank.org
Workshop on Performace Accountability and Integrity
Mostar, December 4, 2007
Perceived Problems of Government
• Too bureaucratic
• Too big
• Too inefficient, ineffective
• Unaccountable, lack of transparency
• corruption
Core of “New Public Management”
• Not what government ought to do.
• But how to do it better
• Sometimes advanced as the best solution to
government’s key problems
– Builds on principal-agent models and new-
institutional economics
Basic Elements of New Public
Management Strategies
• Strategic planning
• Incentives
• Flexibility
• Results
Strategic Planning
• From incremental to comprehensive look at
government activities
• How: devise a plan for future
• Goal: produce consensus of government’s
direction
Incentives
• From authority and control to markets and
results
• How:
– Create semi-autonomous agencies
– Write contracts to structure government work
• Goal: replace top-down control with
bottom-up focus on results
Flexibility
• From rule based to results based
accountability
• How: employee empowerment, market
based incentives
• Goal: free employees to do what they know
is right.
Results
• From focus on inputs to results
• Defining results but how?
– Outputs: government activity- service delivery
– Outcome: impact of government activity
• How: measure, reward results
• Goal: fundamentally transform
government’s operations
Performance Results Chain
Application in Education
Program objectives Inputs Intermediate inputs
Improve quantity, Educational spending by Enrollments, student-
quality, and access to age, sex, urban/rural; teacher ratio, class size
education services spending by level; teachers,
staff, facilities, tools, books
Outputs Outcomes Impact Reach
Achievement Literacy rates, Informed Winners and
scores, graduation supply of skilled citizenry, civic losers from
rates, drop-out professionals engagement, government
rates enhanced programs
international
competitiveness
Alternative New Public Management
Frameworks
• Letting managers manage: operational flexibility
and freedom – few rules more discretion
• Making managers manage. Accountability for
results. Contracts/work program agreements based
upon pre-specified output and performance targets
and budgetary allocations new civil service
framework
• Subsidiarity principle
• Competitive service delivery and benchmarking
• Incentives for cost efficiency (including capital
use)
Tools for Results Oriented
Management—external, citizen focus
Question for results-oriented management Management The entire
tool process driven
by a citizen
focus:
Contract information— what is the final Performance-
product we must produce and what do we based budget
receive to produce such product?
How do we know how we are doing in terms of Benchmarking All these tools
the contract, and in terms of other producers are connected to
from whom we can learn? Total Quality
How much does it cost to produce such product Activity-Based Management
(the complete cost)? How can we produce the Costing (and and such devices
product better so we can be sure of meeting and others) used to create a
exceeding our contract obligation and receiving results and
rewards? participation
How do we report our results? Full reporting culture, and
using accrual work effectively
accounting where roles
emphasize
How do we manage the new reporting, Balanced
production, and contract obligations we have, Scorecard results.
as well as run a citizen friendly administration?
Civil service paradigm under resulted
oriented management
Current culture NPM
• Rigid rules • Managerial flexibility
• Input controls • Results matter
• Top-down accountability • Bottom-up accountability
• Low wages and high perks • Competitive wages but
• Life-long and rotating little else
appointments • Contractual and task
• Intolerance for specialization
risk/innovation • Freedom to fail/succeed
The Practice of New Public
Management
• Letting managers manage
– New managerialism in USA. Australia
– Autonomous agency model in UK
– Alternative service delivery framework in
Canada
Making managers manage
– New contractualism in New Zealand
– Client’s charter in Malaysia
The Canadian Approach
• Getting Government Right Through Alternate
Service Delivery Approach
Alternative Service Delivery Framework
Alternative Service Delivery Options
Public
Interest
Test Service Shedding
Yes No Abandon
Abandon Privatization - divestiture -
Role of regulated
Government Employee Takeover
Test
Yes
Jurisdictional No Public Partnership -
Alignment Realign
Realign
devolution - shared services
Contracting Out - franchising -
Test licensing
Yes Yes
External Government Owned/Contractor
Partner Operated
Partnership Partner Private, Not-for-profit Agency -
Test self-help - volunteers
No Public/Private Partnership
Business Restructure
Restructure Crown Corporation -
Principles Yes departmental corporation
Test Improve
Special Operating Agency
No Improve Utility
Line Organization
An Example: Education grant to Encourage
Competition and Innovation
Allocation basis among local governments:
School age population (ages 5-17)
Secondary distribution to providers: Equal per
pupil to both public and private schools
Conditions: Universal access to primary and
secondary education regardless of parents’
income, improvement in educational outcomes.
No conditions on the use of grant funds.
Penalties: Public censure, reduction of grants
funds
The State Under Contract - The
New Zealand Model
• Core public sector: culture shift from input controls
to output accountability
• The new contractualism: examples - central bank
governor, minister of finance
• Separation of policy and implementation; separation
of financing/purchasing/provision
• Decentralized management with budgetary flexibility
and autonomy
• Commercialization or privatization
• Responsible fiscal management
Accountability for Results -
Malaysian Approach
• Customer orientation through Client’s Charter (1993):
transparency, service standards, measurement, feedback,
redress
• Managerial flexibility with output accountability (1990)
• Decentralized management
• Partnership approach to service delivery; contestable
policy advice
• comparative evaluation of service providers
• Deregulation, commercialization, privatization and
partnership
Output Orientation under the
Malaysian and NZ Models
• Program agreements monitored for
achievement in outputs and impacts
• Output budgeting
• Activity based costing
• capital charging
• Accrual accounting
• Monitoring government’s net worth
Has NPM worked?
• Big positive impact on government
operations in New Zealand, Malaysia and
Canada
• Modest positive impact on government
operations in UK and Australia
• Little impact in the USA
The Kiwi (NZ) Experience To Date
• Remarkable results in performance
improvement: Deficit, Debt, Net worth
• The New Contractualism at Local level:
Astonishing turnaround in Papakura
• Some difficulties in social services
• Political responsibility for bureaucratic
incompetence: The Tragedy at Cave Creek
The Canadian Experience To
Date
• Deficit cut from 7.5% of GDP in 1993 to zero in
1998 and sustained surpluses thereafter.
• Number of departments reduced from 38 to 25
• Civil service size reduced from 220K to 187K
• Increase in spending on social services, justice,
and science and technology
• Improvement in service delivery and citizen
satisfaction
Improving on NPM
• Citizen-centered
Governance
Genesis of Citizen-centered
Governance
Athenian Oath: “We will strive
increasingly to quicken the public
sense of public duty; That thus…
we will transmit this city not only
not less, but greater, better and
more beautiful than it was
transmitted to us”.
Key Elements of Citizen
Centered Governance Reforms
• Citizens charter
– Service standards
– Requirements for citizens voice and choice
• Subsidiarity
• Citizen oriented output budgeting
– Service delivery outputs and costs
– Citizens report card on service delivery performance for
the previous year
• Public sector as a purchaser through performance contracts
but not necessarily provider of services
• Alternate Service Delivery Framework
• Benchmarking
A ROAD MAP FOR CITIZEN-CENTERED
GOVERNANCE
Program/ Inputs Activities Outputs Reach Outcomes Impacts
project (goals)
2. Administration concerned with outputs.
Clear roles
in the
government 2. Output 2. Executive
production contract concerned with
process, outcomes
1.Bottom-
up,
2.Focused Legislature
on 3. Internal 2.
managing and external Outcome
for results, Results and contract
and process 1. Citizens
3.Evaluated Evaluations
in terms of
those
results.
3.Citizen
3. E V A L U A T I O N S evaluations
Citizen-centered governance: An
Example - Switzerland
• Direct democracy provisions
• Subsidiarity
CCG- Road Map to Wrecks and
Ruins
• Underdeveloped bureaucracy argument
• Input control systems not well developed
• Corporatization and fragmentation - PMUs
• Managerial discretion - opportunities for
abuse of public office for private gain
• Fine for production and process tasks but
what about craft and coping organizations?
• Weak potential for contract enforcement
• Weaker top-down accountability
• Weak legislative accountability under separation
of executive and legislative branches
• Moral hazard in social services provision
• Political responsibility for bureaucratic
incompetence. The Tragedy at Cave Creek
• Moral: look before you leapfrog?
CCG: towards a better
tomorrow?
• Improved norms of conduct (Malaysia, UK)
• Cultural shift from input controls to output and
accountability (New Zealand, Malaysia)
• Encouragement of partnership, competition and risk
taking (Malaysia and Canada Alternative Service
Delivery Framework)
• Greater bottom-up accountability
• Design of incentives critical
• In LDCs strong potential for improving public sector
performance
• Moral: Leapfrog or meet a slow death
CCG - Road Map to Wrecks and Ruins
or to a Better Tomorrow?
Leapfrog or Meet a Slow Death?
• Bottoms up accountability is the key
• Design of incentives critical
• In LDCs strong potential for improving
public sector performance
Governance Structure:
20th Versus 21st Century
• Unitary • Federal / confederal
• Centralized • Globalized & localized
• Center manages • Center leads
• Bureaucratic • Participatory
• Command and control • Responsive and Accountable
• Internally dependent • Competitive
• Closed and slow • Open and quick
• Intolerance of risk • Freedom to fail/ succeed
Implications
• We keep trying because reform is eternal
and
– We never fully succeed
– We can’t stop trying.
ROME - Road Map to Wrecks and Ruins
?
•Dilbert’s perspectives -
This fad will also pass
away.
Get documents about "