THE CURRENT AND FUTURE CAP AND GENERAL INDUSTRY OUTLOOK
Document Sample


The New Rural Development
Programme for England:
An Overview
Carl Atkin
Head of Land & Business Research
Bidwells
Rural Development: Context
Rural Development was introduced as the
“second pillar” of the CAP under the Agenda
2000 CAP Reforms
Implemented in England as the England Rural
Development Programme (ERDP)
“Scheme Led” approach – Rural Development
Service (RDS) the Lead Agency
Old ERDP: 2000 to 2006
Socio-Economic Schemes
Rural Enterprise Scheme (RES)
Processing and Marketing Grant Scheme (PMG)
Vocational Training Scheme (VTS)
Energy Crops Scheme (ECS)
Agri-Environment Type Schemes
Countryside Stewardship and Environmentally
Sensitive Areas (replaced in 2005 by Environmental
Stewardship)
Woodland Grant Scheme and Farm Woodland
Premium Scheme
Hill Farm Allowance
European Guidelines for Rural
Development
Identify the areas where the use of EU support for
rural development creates the most value added
at EU level;
Make the link with the main EU priorities (Lisbon
and Goteborg);
Ensure consistency with other EU policies, in
particular cohesion and environment;
Accompany the implementation of the new
market orientated CAP and the necessary
restructuring it will entail in the old and new
Member States
EAFRD
New central fund for the first time working to six
principles:
– Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and
forestry sectors
– Improving the environment and the countryside
– Improving the quality of life in rural areas and
encouraging diversification
– Building Local Capacity for Employment and
Diversification
– Translating priorities into programmes
– Complementarity between Community Instruments
UK share of budget €1.909 bn (or £1.3 bn)
which represents just 2.46% of the EU 25
budget
This compares to €13 billion for Poland and €8
billion for Germany and Italy
New RDPE 2007 – 2013
Axis 1 – Improving the competitiveness of the
farming and forestry sector (min 10% of funds)
Axis 2 – Improving the environment and the
countryside (min 25% of funds)
Axis 3 – Improving rural quality of life and
diversifying the rural economy (min 10% of
funds)
Axis 4 – Leader – an “approach” (min 5% of
funds)
Why the delay?
Funding problems with new RDPE; UK share of
the core funding very low
Political game playing in Brussels over Voluntary
Modulation – essential if UK were to have any
decent new programme
Potentially more complicated delivery
arrangements given the Modernising Rural
Delivery Agenda
So How Much Money is there?
(England)
Core Funding (EAFRD) £749 million
Old Voluntary Modulation £101 million
New Voluntary Modulation £1,455 million
Co-Financing of EAFRD & State Aids £850 million
Co-Financing of Voluntary Modulation £832 million
TOTAL £3,987 million
and how is it being spent. . . .
Axis 1 – about £298 million (including £47
million for an Energy Crops Scheme and £249
million delivered by the RDAs)
Axis 2 – about £3.28 billion including £2.9 billion
for environmental stewardship
Axis 3 – about £348 million largely delivered by
the RDAs
Convergence funding – £55 million for Cornwall
R.I.P. - RES / PMG / VTS
Project based schemes will not be replaced
Each RDA will hold a “pot” of money and use a
mixture of open application, invitation to tender
and commissioned projects
Aim is to achieve their regional objectives for
RDPE which will be more closely aligned to other
regional strategies
So why not replace the old
schemes?
Mid-term evaluation of the ERDP was critical of
the cost of administration of the old programme
Desire to simplify and mainstream rural funding as
part of the wider socio-economic agenda
- Too many schemes
- Too many delivery bodies
- Move to more strategic outcomes
The New RDPE:
What does it mean practically?
Energy Crops Scheme managed by Natural
England
Environmental Stewardship managed by
Natural England
England Woodland Grant Scheme managed by
the Forestry Commission
Hill Farm Allowance managed by the Rural
Payments Agency
Socio-Economic Funding managed by the
RDAs (Axis 1,3 and Leader)
Get documents about "