Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

GAPNA Meeting Content Chronic Constipation and IBS

VIEWS: 104 PAGES: 65

									 Practical Approaches Towards Improving
Patient Outcomes for Chronic Constipation
    and Irritable Bowel Syndrome With
 Constipation (IBS-C) Among Older Adults
     Educational Learning Objectives
•   Describe the elements of proper diagnosis and follow-up management of
    chronic constipation (CC) in older adults

•   Demonstrate awareness of the prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome-
    constipation (IBS-C) in older adults and the elements of differential
    diagnosis from CC

•   Discuss how management of CC and IBS-C varies based upon underlying
    etiologies and across the spectrum of older adults, from the active
    community dweller to the compromised long term care resident with multiple
    comorbidities

•   List common patient perceptions of constipation and describe how these
    may impact progress towards practitioners' clinical goals in CC and IBS-C

•   Identify patient education and counseling strategies that will allow advanced
    practice nurses (APN) to collaborate with patients and family members in
    the successful management of CC and IBS-C in older adults
          How Do We Define Constipation?
          • The American College of Gastroenterology (ACG)
            definition of constipation:
               – Unsatisfactory defecation characterized by infrequent stools,
                 difficult stool passage, or both. Difficult stool passage includes
                 straining, a sense of difficulty passing stool, incomplete
                 evacuation, hard/lumpy stools, prolonged time to pass stool, or
                 need for manual maneuvers to pass stool


          • The ACG Chronic Constipation Task Force also
            clarified what is meant by chronic:
               – Chronic constipation is defined as the presence of these
                 symptoms for at least 3 months



American College of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Task Force. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(S1):1-4.
                    GI Symptoms Are Common
                      in the Older Population
   • 35% to 40% of geriatric patients will have at least 1 GI
     symptom in any year
         – Constipation, fecal incontinence, diarrhea, irritable bowel
           syndrome, reflux disease, and swallowing disorders

   • Prevalence rates for constipation in the older adult
     population range from approximately 19% to 40%
         – Day Hospitals/Living at Home: 25–40%
         – Nursing Homes/Geriatric Hospitals: 60–80%

   • Irritable bowel syndrome presents in ~10% of the older
     population

Hall KE, et al. Gastroenterology. 2005;129:1305-1338.
Ginsberg D, et al. Urol Nursing. 2007;27:191-200.
Morley J. Clin Geriatr Med. 2007;23:823-832.
    Overlap Between Common Disorders
                    Bloating
                                                                Constipation

                                                Chronic
                                              Constipation
          Belching
                          Dyspepsia



                                                            IBS
                 Discomfort                                         Abdominal
                                                                    Pain
                                        GERD

                      Heartburn                           Regurgitation




Brandt L, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(S1):5-22.
    Abdominal Pain: Salient Feature Absent
          in Chronic Constipation



                    (-) Abdominal Pain                       (+) Abdominal Pain
                      Chronic                                   IBS with
                    constipation                              constipation




                      Presence or absence of abdominal pain is the
                              major differentiating feature


Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(suppl 1):S5-S21.
                                 Prevalence of Functional
                                 Gastrointestinal Disorders
                   45
                   40      40

                   35
                                   25-40
  Population (%)




                   30                         2-28                               28
                                                         25
                   25
                                                                   3-20
                   20                                                                      6-18

                   15
                   10                                                                                  8         8

                   5
                   0
                        Dyspepsia Functional  Chronic    GERD       IBS       Hyper- Migraine Asthma Diabetes
                                  Heartburn Constipation                     tension

Wong WM, Fass R. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2004;7(4):273-278.   Wolf-Maier K, et al. JAMA. 2003;289:2363-2369.
Corazziari E. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2004;18(4):613-631.    Lawrence EC. South Med J. 2004 Nov;97(11):1069-1077.
Higgins PD, Johanson JF. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99(4):750-759.        CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53:145-148.
Brandt L, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(suppl11):S7-26.            CDC. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2003;52:833-837.
                        Constipation Increases With Age
                        and Is More Common in Women

                                   Study 1                                               Men           Women
                                                                            25
                                  N = 42,375
                   12              Harari, et al
                              Population: NHIS 1989                         20
                   10




                                                         Constipation (%)
Constipation (%)




                               Criteria: self-report




                                                          Prevalence of
 Prevalence of




                   8                                                        15

                   6
                                                                            10
                   4
                   2                                                         5

                   0                                                         0
                                                                                 Study 2       Study 3      Study 4
                                                                                 N = 5,430     N = 1,149   N = 10,018
                                                                                 Drossman        Pare       Stewart

                           Age Group (years)                                                     Sex

               NHIS = National Health Interview Survey

    Higgins PDR, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:750-759.
                           Chronic Constipation Interferes with
                           Daily Lives of the Aging Population
                                                                                              Constipation
                                                                                              No GI symptoms
                   100
  Mean MOS Score




                    80

                    60

                    40

                    20
                      0
                           Physical      Role                    Social            Mental             Health              Bodily
                          Functioning Functioning              Functioning         Health           Perception             Pain
                     MOS = medical outcomes survey
                   • Impact of chronic constipation on quality of life in Olmsted County, MN, residents aged ≥ 65 years
                   • Lower score indicates worse quality of life


Adapted from Talley NJ. Rev Gastroenterol Disord. 2004;4(suppl 2):S3-S10.
         Economic Impact of Constipation

     • 2.5 million office visits annually
     • 92,000 hospital admissions
     • 85% are given prescriptions for laxatives or cathartics
     • $400 million dollars spent in annually for prescription laxatives
     • $2253 average cost per long term care resident


     Economic Burden of Irritable Bowel Syndrome
     • IBS care: > $20 billion direct and indirect expenditures
     • Patients with IBS consume > 50% more health care costs than
       matched controls without IBS


Tariq S. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007;8:209-218.
Ginsberg D, et al. Urol Nursing. 2007;27(3):191-201.
ACG IBS Task Force. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:S1-S35.
           Normal Physiology of Defecation
          •   Increased abdominal pressure or propulsive colorectal contractions
          •   Relaxation of internal anal sphincter (autonomic)
          •   Relaxation of external anal sphincter (voluntary)
          •   Straightening of pelvic musculature (levator ani, puborectalis)
                            At rest
                                                                        With straining




Lembo A, Camilleri M. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1360-1368.
Muller-Lissner S. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2002;16:115-133.
 Mediators of Gastrointestinal Function

 Motility                                           Visceral Sensitivity
 Serotonin                                          Serotonin
 Acetylcholine                                      Tachykinins
 Nitric oxide                                       Calcitonin gene-related peptide
                                                    Neurokinin A
 Substance P                                        Enkephalins
 Vasoactive intestinal peptide                      Corticotropin releasing factor
 Cholecystokinin
 Corticotropin releasing factor

                                       Secretion
                                       Serotonin
                                       Acetylcholine

Kim DY, Camilleri M. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95(10):2698-2709.
                      Rome III Diagnostic Criteria*
                      for Functional Constipation

             Chronic constipation must include 2 or more of the following:


                         During at least 25% of defecations


                                        Sensation       Sensation of     Manual
                      Lumpy or                                                             <3
                                           of            anorectal     maneuvers
     Straining          hard                                                           defecations
                                       incomplete       obstruction/   to facilitate
                       stools                                                           per week
                                       evacuation        blockage      defecations

         Loose stools are rarely present without the use of laxatives
         Insufficient criteria for irritable bowel syndrome
    *Criteria fulfilled for the last 3 months with symptom onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis




Longstreth GF, et al. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480-1491.
                              Primary Causes of
                             Chronic Constipation


                         • Normal-transit constipation
                         • Slow-transit constipation
                         • Defecatory dysfunction
                         • IBS with constipation




Bosshard W, et al. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:911-930.
Hadley S.K, et al. Journal of Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:2501-2506.
                           Primary Constipation

      • Normal-transit Constipation
        – Intestinal transit and stool frequency are within the normal
          range
        – Most frequent type of constipation




Bosshard W, et al. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:911-930.
Gallagher P, et al. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(10):807-821.
                         Primary Constipation

     • Slow-transit Constipation
     – Characterized by prolonged intestinal transit time
     – Altered regulation of enteric nervous system
     – Decreased nitric oxide production
     – Impaired gastrocolic reflex
     – Alteration of neuropeptides (VIP, substance P)
     – Decreased number of interstitial cells of Cajal in the colon




Lembo A, Camilleri M. N Eng J Med. 2003;349:1360-1368.
                          Primary Constipation
        • Defecatory Dysfunction
          – More common in older women – childbirth trauma
          – Pelvic floor dyssynergia
          – Contributing factors include anal fissures,
            hemorrhoids, rectocele, rectal prolapse, posterior
            rectal herniation
          – Excessive perineal descent
          – Pathogenesis may be multifactorial – structural
            problem
          – Abnormal anorectal manometry and/or defecography



[Role for biofeedback therapy]

Bosshard W, et al. Drugs Aging. 2004;21:911-930.
Hadley S.K, et al. Journal of Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:2501-2506.
                      Primary Constipation
• Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) with Constipation
      – Alterations in brain-gut axis
         – Stress-related condition
         – Visceral hypersensitivity
         – Abnormal brain activation
         – Altered gastrointestinal motility
         – Role for neurotransmitters, hormones
         – Presence of non-GI symptoms
               Headache, back pain, fatigue, myalgia, dyspareunia, urinary
                    symptoms, dizziness




Videlock E, Chang L. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2007;36:665-685.
Hadley SK, et al. Journal of Am Fam Physician. 2005;72:2501-2506.
                  Rome III Criteria for IBS-C
    Recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort (an uncomfortable
    sensation not described as pain) at least 3 days per month in the
    last 3 months associated with 2 or more of the following:

          1. Improvement with defecation
          2. Onset associated with a change in frequency of stool
          3. Onset associated with a change in form of stool

    Criteria must be fulfilled for the last 3 months, with symptom
    onset at least 6 months prior to diagnosis

    In pathophysiology research and clinical trials, a pain/discomfort frequency of at least 2
    days a week during screening for patient eligibility




Longstreth G, et al. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480-1491.
                                             Subtypes of IBS
        % Hard or Lumpy Stools
                                 100


                                 75

                                 50
                                           IBS-C        IBS-M

                                 25
                                           IBS-U        IBS-D

                                       0           25     50      75     100
IBS-C: IBS with constipation
IBS-U: Unsubtyped IBS                         % Loose or Watery Stools
IBS-M: IBS mixed
IBS-D: IBS with diarrhea

Longstreth G, et al. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1480-1491.
    Combined Risk Factors for Constipation
          in the Elderly Population
•    Reduced fiber intake
•    Reduced liquid intake
•    Reduced mobility associated with functional decline
•    Decreased functional independence
•    Pelvic floor dysfunction
•    Chronic conditions
     –   Parkinson’s disease
     –   Dementia
     –   Diabetes mellitus
     –   Depression
• Polypharmacy (both over the counter and prescription
  medications, such as NSAIDs, antacids, antihistamines,
  iron supplements, anticholinergics, opiates, Ca channel
  blockers, diuretics, antipsychotics, anxiolytics,
  antidepressants)
               Common Changes with Aging that
               Increase the Risk for Constipation

      •    Decreased total body water
      •    Decreased colonic motility*
      •    Deterioration of nerve function
      •    Increased pelvic floor descent
      •    Decreased rectal compliance
      •    Decreased rectal sensation
      •    Age-related changes to the internal and external anal
           sphincter


 *Demonstrated in some, but not all studies
Gallagher P, et al. Drugs Aging. 2008;25(10):807-821.
Schiller L. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2001;30:497-515.
                 Patient Care

• Thorough patient history
• Physical/abdominal/digital rectal exams
• Evaluate symptoms in terms of diagnostic criteria
  – Chronic constipation/IBS-C
• Assessment for red flags/alarm features
  – Need for additional testing
• Treatment/Management plan
                   Ask the Right Questions
        •    Define the meaning of “constipation”
        •    How long have you experienced these symptoms?
        •    Frequency of bowel movements?
        •    Abdominal pain?
        •    Other symptoms?
        •    What is most distressing symptom?
        •    Manual maneuvers to assist with defecation?
        •    Any limitation of daily activities?
        •    Are you taking any medications?
        •    What treatment have you tried?
        •    What investigations have been done?


Locke GR III, et al. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761-1778.
                                    Common Patient Descriptions
                       90                of Constipation
                               81
                       80
                                          72
                       70                                                Physicians think:
 Percent of Patients




                                                                         < 3 BM per week
                       60                           54
                       50
                                                              39       37
                       40                                                       36
                       30                                                                    28

                       20
                       10
                       0
                            Straining   Hard or Incomplete    Stool Abdominal < 3 BM   Need to
                                        lumpy    emptying    cannot fullness or  per   press on
                                        stools                 be    bloating   week     anus
                                                             passed

N = 1149

Pare P, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:3130-3137.
                     Stool Form Correlates With
                       Intestinal Transit Time
                          The Bristol Stool Form Scale
      Slow Transit
                        Type 1                 Separate hard lumps

                        Type 2                 Sausage-like but lumpy

                                               Sausage-like but with cracks
                        Type 3
                                               in the surface

                        Type 4                 Smooth and soft

                        Type 5                 Soft blobs with clear-cut edges

                                               Fluffy pieces with ragged edges,
                        Type 6
                                               a mushy stool
      Fast Transit
                        Type 7                 Watery, no solid pieces


O’Donnell LJD, et al. BMJ. 1990;300:439-440.
               Consider Secondary Causes
                                                                                     Drugs
            Psychological                                                             Opiates
                 Depression                           Surgical                    Antidepressants
               Eating disorders                 Abdominal/pelvic surgery
                                                                                  Anticholinergics
                                                Colonic/anorectal surgery
                                                                                   Antipsychotics
                                                                                 Antacids (Al, Ca)
                                                                                Ca channel blockers
    Lifestyle                                                                    Iron supplements
Inadequate fiber/fluid
     Inactivity
                                       Constipation
     Metabolic/
     Endocrine                                                                  Gastrointestinal
     Hypercalcemia                  Neurological                                Colorectal: neoplasm,
   Hyperparathyroidism                   Parkinson’s                             ischemia, volvulus,
    Diabetes mellitus                 Multiple sclerosis        Systemic             megacolon,
     Hypothyroidism                Autonomic neuropathy          Amyloidosis     diverticular disease
      Hypokalemia                       Aganglionosis            Scleroderma    Anorectal: prolapse,
         Uremia                   (Hirschsprung’s, Chagas)       Polymyositis    rectocele, stenosis,
       Addison’s                        Spinal lesions            Pregnancy         megarectum
       Porphyria                  Cerebrovascular disease
Candelli M, et al. Hepatogastroenterology. 2001;48:1050-1057.
Locke GR, et al. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761-1766.
                           Digital Rectal Exam
    • Place patient in left lateral recumbent position
    • Visually inspect the perianal region
          – Fissures, hemorrhoids, masses, skin tags, or evidence of
            previous surgery, skin lesions
    • Stroke the perianal skin to elicit a reflex contraction of
      the external anal sphincter
    • Assess for paradoxical pelvic floor contraction
      (suggestive of pelvic floor descent)
    • Perform a digital assessment
          – Strictures, masses, a rectocele, and hemorrhoids
          – Examine stool for color and consistency
          – Check for occult blood


Rao SSC. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003;32:659-683.
Locke GR III, et al. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761-1778.
                    Any Alarm Symptoms?
                 Are Diagnostic Tests Needed?
      •     Hematochezia
      •     Family history of colon cancer
      •     Family history of inflammatory bowel disease
      •     Anemia
      •     Positive fecal occult blood test
      •     “Unexplained” weight loss ≥ 10 pounds
      •     Severe, persistent constipation that is unresponsive
            to treatment
      •     New-onset constipation in an elderly patient


Locke GR III, et al. Gastroenterology. 2000;119:1761-1778.
Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(suppl 1):S5-S21.
    ACG Task Force Recommendations
         on Diagnostic Testing
  • ACG task force does not recommend diagnostic testing
    in patients without alarm signs or symptoms
        – BUT routine colon cancer screening recommended for all
          patients aged ≥ 50 years (African Americans aged ≥ 45 years)
  • Diagnostic studies are indicated in patients with alarm
    signs or symptoms
  • Thyroid function tests
  • Measurements of
        – Calcium
        – Electrolytes




Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(suppl 1):S5-S21.
Agrawal S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:515-523.
                 Diagnostic Tests That
            May Be Performed After a Referral
         Test                                              Use
                          Assesses the internal and external anal sphincters, pelvic floor, and
 Anorectal                associated nerves
 manometry
                          Screening test of choice for dyssynergic defecation
 Balloon                  Detects defecatory disorders
 expulsion                Simple, office-based screening test
                          Detects structural abnormalities of the rectum
 Defecography
                          Operator dependent, poor reliability, not widely available
 Colonic transit
 study                    Measures rate at which fecal mass moves through colon


                          Provides a visual diagnosis while performing biopsies with detection
 Colonoscopy              and removal of polyps


Rao SSC, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1605-1615.
Lembo A, Camilleri M. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1360-1368.
Winawer S, et al. Gastroenterol. 2003;124:544-560.
         Differentiating Between
   Occasional and Chronic Constipation
Occasional Constipation              Chronic Constipation
                                     Present for at least 3 months and
Infrequent
                                     may persist for years
Occasional or short-term
                                     Long-term condition that may
condition that may temporarily
                                     dominate personal and work life
interrupt usual routine
May be brought on by patient’s       Not only related to patient’s
behavior, change in diet, lack of    behavior, change in diet, lack of
exercise, illness, or medication     exercise, or medication
May be relieved by diet, exercise,
                                     May need medical attention and
and over-the-counter (OTC)
                                     prescription medication
medication
                        Lifestyle Modifications

     Modification                   Targeted Mechanism                              Efficacy

    Increase fluid       Increase stool volume by augmenting                Limited; majority of fluid
    intake               luminal fluid                                      is absorbed before
                                                                            reaching the colon and is
                                                                            expelled via urine
    Increase             Improve motility by decreasing transit time        Moderate; some
    exercise             through the GI tract                               evidence suggests this is
                                                                            beneficial; however, not
                                                                            sufficient to treat
    Increase dietary     Increase water and bulk stool volume               Limited benefit compared
    fiber                                                                   with placebo




Chung BD, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1999;28:29-32.
Dukas L, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:1790-1796.
ACG Chronic Constipation Task Force. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(suppl 1):S1-S4.
         Treating Constipation With Laxatives
         Laxative                                      Description

                            Absorbs liquids in the intestines and swells to form a soft, bulky
   Bulking Agents           stool; the increase in fecal bulk is associated with accelerated
                            luminal propulsion
                     Draws water into the bowel from surrounding body tissues
                     providing a soft stool mass and improved propulsion
   Osmotic Laxatives
                     [saline, poorly absorbed mono- and disaccharides, polyethylene
                     glycol]
   Stimulant                Cause rhythmic muscle contractions in the intestines, increase
   Laxatives                intestinal motility and secretions
                            Coats the bowel and the stool mass with a waterproof film; stool
   Lubricants
                            remains soft and its passage is made easier
                            Helps liquids mix into the stool and prevent dry, hard stool masses;
   Stool Softeners          has been said not to cause a bowel movement but instead allows
                            the patient to have a bowel movement without straining
                            Combinations containing more than 1 type of laxative; for example,
   Combinations             a product may contain both a stool softener and a stimulant
                            laxative
Gallagher P, et al. Drugs Aging. 2008;25:807-821.
                                             Laxatives
Laxative Type                       Generic Name                                        Brand Name(s)
                  Methylcellulose                                      Citrucel®
Bulk-forming      Polycarbophil                                        FiberCon®, Fiber-Lax®
                  Psyllium                                             Metamucil®, Konsyl®

                  Glycerin                                             Glycerin suppository (generic)

                  Mineral oil                                          Mineral oil (generic)
Lubricating
                  Magnesium hydroxide (milk of magnesia) and mineral
                                                                       Phillips’® M-O
                  oil

                                                                       Colace®, Dulcolax® Stool Softener, Phillips’
Stool Softeners   Docusate sodium
                                                                       Liqui-Gels®

                                                                       Ex-Lax® Milk of Magnesia Laxative/Antacid
Saline            Magnesium hydroxide (milk of magnesia)               Phillips’® Chewable Tablets
                                                                       Phillips’® Milk of Magnesia

                  Bisacodyl                                            Ex-Lax Ultra, Dulcolax Bowel Prep Kit

                  Sodium bicarbonate and potassium bitartrate          Ceo-Two Evacuant®
Stimulant         Sennosides                                           Ex-Lax® Laxative Pills
                  Castor oil                                           Purge®
                  Senna                                                Senokot®
                  Polyethylene glycol 3350                             GlycoLax®, MiraLAX
Osmotic
                  Lactulose                                            Kristalose®
                               Bulk Laxatives:
                              Review of Efficacy
                                                                        Summary and
  Laxative           Studies                     Evidence
                                                                       Recommendation
 Psyllium        • 5 RCTs:            • 2 trials: greater stool      Psyllium appears to
                 – 3 placebo            frequency, better stool      improve stool
                   controlled           consistency, and greater     frequency and
                                        ease of defecation           consistency
                 – 1 well
                   designed           • 1 trial: no improvement
                                                                     GRADE B
 Bran            • 3 RCTs:            • Stool frequency was          Insufficient data to
                 – 1 placebo            significantly greater with   make a
                   controlled           bran than placebo if         recommendation
                                        placebo was given first,
                 – All poorly           but not if bran was given
                   designed             first




Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S5-S21.
      Stool Softeners and Stimulant Laxatives:
                 Review of Efficacy
                                                                           Summary and
   Laxative          Studies                     Evidence                 Recommendation
  Docusate        • 4 RCTs:          • 1 trial: greater stool           Insufficient data to make
                  – 2 placebo          frequency                        recommendation
                    controlled       • 1 trial: greater stool           Docusate may be inferior
                  – 3 well             frequency and global             to psyllium in increasing
                    designed           symptom assessment               stool frequency
                                     • 2 trials: no improvement (1 vs
                                       placebo, 1 vs psyllium)


  Stimulant       • 4 RCTs:          • In 3 studies, no difference     Not possible to make a
  laxatives       – None               between stimulant laxative      recommendation about
                    placebo            and control in stool frequency efficacy
                    controlled         or consistency
                  – Low-quality      • 1 trial: less efficacy compared
                    study design       with lactulose at increasing
                                       stool frequency

RCT = randomized controlled trial
Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S5-S21.
                              Osmotic Laxatives:
                              Review of Efficacy
                                                                             Summary and
    Laxative             Studies                     Evidence              Recommendation
  Lactulose           • 3 RCTs:           • All trials favor lactulose   Effective at improving
                      – All placebo       • Significantly improved       stool frequency and
                        controlled          stool consistency            stool consistency

                      – 2 well            • Mean number of BM/day
                        designed            significantly greater vs     GRADE A
                                            placebo
  Polyethylene        • 5 placebo-        • Increased stool              Effective at improving
  Glycol (PEG)          controlled          frequency and                stool frequency and
                        RCTs                improvement in stool         stool consistency
                      • 2 RCTs              consistency vs. placebo
                        comparing         • Stool frequency greater,     GRADE A
                        PEG and             straining less often,
                        lactulose           overall effectiveness
                                            higher vs. lactulose


Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S5-S21.
                                           PEG 3350 – 12-Month Study
     An Open-Label, Single Treatment Multi-Centre Study of
             311 Patients (117 aged 65 and older)
                                  100
                                                completely relieved    somewhat relieved        unchanged
                                   90
         Percentage of Patients




                                   80
                                   70
                                   60
                                                                                     52              50
                                                                       49
                                   50                    46
                                           40
                                   40
                                   30
                                   20           16            15            14
                                                                                          10              11
                                   10                4             3             3             1               1
                                     0
                                  Visits   2 months      4 months      6 months       9 months      12 months
                                            N = 250       N = 217       N = 203        N = 185       N = 180
                             PEG 3350 was determined safe and effective for treating constipation in adult older
                                   patients for periods up to 12 months, with no signs of tachyphylaxis


Di Palma J. Ailment Pharmacol Ther. 2006;25;703-708.
                Adverse Effects of Laxatives
    • Bulking agents
          – Bloating
          – Severe adverse events: esophageal and colonic obstruction,
            anaphylactic reactions

    • Osmotic laxatives
          – Possible electrolyte abnormalities, hypovolemia
          – Diarrhea (2% to 40% of PEG-treated patients)
          – Excessive stool frequency, nausea, abdominal bloating,
            cramping, flatulence

    • Stimulant laxatives
          – Abdominal discomfort, electrolyte imbalances, allergic reactions,
            hepatotoxicity

Brandt LJ, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:S5-S21.
                       Dangers of Saline Laxatives
                             in the Elderly
      • Oral sodium phosphate products [Visicol®, OsmoPrep®,
        Fleet* Phospho-soda] for bowel cleansing
      • Black box warning for Visicol®, OsmoPrep®
      • Acute phosphate nephropathy
      • Patients with identifiable risk factors
            –   Age > 55
            –   Baseline kidney disease
            –   Hypovolemic, reduced intravascular volume
            –   Bowel obstruction, active colitis
            –   Using medications that affect renal perfusion or function



*Withdrawn from the market
Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/OSP_solution/default.htm. Accessed April 2009.
                                            Are Patients Satisfied With
                                              Laxatives and Fiber?
                               100
                                                 OTC laxatives          Prescription laxatives        Fiber
                                                 (n = 146)              (n = 42)                      (n = 268)
                                                                                                 79                    80
                                80                                                        75
   Dissatisfied Patients (%)




                                                                                    71
                                                                          66                              67
                                                             60
                                60
                                            50     50              50                                             52
                                      44
                                40



                                20



                                 0
                                     Ineffective Relief   Ineffective Relief of        Lack of          Ineffective Relief
                                      of Constipation     Multiple Symptoms         Predictability         of Bloating


Johanson JF and Kralstein J. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:599-608.
                                  Lubiprostone:
                     A Chloride Channel Activator
  • Gastrointestinal-targeted bicyclic
    functional fatty acid
  • Activates ClC-2 chloride channels
        – Movement of Cl-, Na+, H2O follow
        – Increased luminal fluid secretion
        – Shortened colonic transit time


  • Indicated for:
        – Treatment of chronic idiopathic
          constipation (24 µg BID) in the adult
          population including age > 65 years
          (FDA approval 2006)
        – Treatment of irritable bowel syndrome
          with constipation (8 µg BID) in women
          ≥ 18 years (FDA approval 2008)


Cuppoletti J, et al. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287:C1173-C1183.
Amitiza PI. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2008/021908s005lbl.pdf. Accessed April 2009.
  Lubiprostone: Stool Frequency in Patients
     Over 65 with Chronic Constipation

                Nonelderly lubiprostone 48 µg              Elderly (≥ 65 years) lubiprostone 48 µg
                Nonelderly placebo                         Elderly placebo

                                     6       *
                                                      *                         *
                                                                  *
              Change from Baseline




                                     5       †                                          *P ≤ 0.03
               in SBM Frequency




                                                                  †                     †P < 0.0001
                                                                                †
                                     4
                                                                                    N = 57 (patients aged
                                     3                                              ≥ 65 years vs placebo)
                                     2
                                     1
                                     0
                                         Week 1   Week 2   Week 3        Week 4

   SBM = spontaneous bowel movement


Ueno R, et al. Annual Meeting of the American College of Gastroenterology;
October 2006; Las Vegas, NV. Johanson J, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:170-177.
             Safety Profile of Lubiprostone

   • Well tolerated in 4 week and 6-12 month trials
   • Nausea, diarrhea, and headache
   • No clinically significant changes in serum
     electrolyte levels
   • Low likelihood of drug-drug interactions
         – Non-absorbed; works intraluminally and does not
           result in measurable blood levels




Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/foi/label/2008/021908s005lbl.pdf. Accessed April 2009.
       Suggested Management Algorithm for
              Chronic Constipation
Bleeding, anemia,
weight loss, sudden     Alarm                   No Alarm
change in stool       Symptoms                 Symptoms
caliber, abdominal
pain
                                             Lifestyle, OTC, stimulant laxative
    Directed testing
                                      No Response                     + Response
 Refer to a specialist as
         needed                          Trial of lactulose
                                           or PEG 3350
                                                                    + Response
                                                                                         Continue
                                      No response
                                                                                         regimen
                                         Trial of lubiprostone
                                      No response                    + Response




OTC = over-the-counter therapies (probiotics, herbal medications, stool softeners
[docusate sodium], psyllium, methylcellulose, calcium polycarbophil, bisacodyl, senna)
                            Treatment for IBS-C
         Treatment                                 Recommendation
                               Moderately effective; single study reported improvement
       Psyllium
                               with calcium polycarbophil
       Wheat or corn           No more effective than placebo in relief of global IBS
       bran                    symptoms; Not recommended for routine use
                               Shown to improve stool frequency, but not abdominal pain
       Polyethylene            in 1 small study
       glycol                  No publications of placebo-controlled, randomized studies
                               of laxatives in IBS-C
                               Short-term course of a non-absorbable antibiotic is more
                               effective than placebo for global improvement of IBS and
       Antibiotics
                               for bloating. No data to support long-term safety and
                               effectiveness
                               In single organism studies, lactobacilli do not appear
       Probiotics              effective for patients with IBS; bifidobacteria and some
                               probiotic combinations demonstrate some efficacy
ACG IBS Task Force. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:S1-S35.
                            Treatment for IBS-C
        Treatment                                   Recommendation
   Antispasmodics               Certain antispasmodics may provide short-term relief of
   (hyoscine,                   abdominal pain/discomfort
   cimetropium,                 Evidence for long-term efficacy is not available; safety and
   pinaverium,                  tolerability evidence is limited
   peppermint oil
                                8 µg BID is more effective than placebo in relieving global
   Lubiprostone                 IBS symptoms in women with IBS-C

                                More effective than placebo at relieving global IBS
   Tricyclic                    symptoms;
   antidepressants
                                Appear to reduce abdominal pain
   Selective serotonin
                                Limited data on safety and tolerability
   reuptake inhibitors
                                Tricyclic antidepressants may worsen constipation
                                Cognitive therapy, dynamic psychotherapy, hypnotherapy
   Psychotherapy                (not relaxation therapy) are more effective than usual care
                                in relieving global symptoms of IBS
ACG IBS Task Force. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:S1-S35.
                                      Lubiprostone for IBS-C
                                    Data From 2 Phase 3 Studies
                                                                        Placebo N = 385

                                                                        Lubiprostone (8 µg BID) N = 769
                                20
                                                                                     Note the different dose!
            Response Rate (%)




                                                                                     For chronic constipation
                                15                P = 0.001                          lubiprostone: 24 µg BID


                                10


                                5

                                0
                                              Combined intent to treat population
                                     Monthly responder for ≥ 2/3 months during treatment


Drossman D, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:329-341.
                                 Lubiprostone – Symptom Change IBS-C

                                                                       Baseline Score

                                  0           2.08                 2.19                2.19                 2.76            2.33
     Mean Change from Baseline




                                 -0.2
                                 -0.4

                                 -0.6
                                 -0.8                                                                                  *
                                 -1.0

                                 -1.2               *                                                                              *
                                                                         *                    *
                                 -1.4    Abdominal             Bloating§          Constipation             Stool           Straining§
                                      Discomfort/Pain§                             Severity§            Consistency†

                                                                                                                              Nonresponder
            §Score:
                                                                                                                              Responder
                                  0 (absent); 1 (mild); 2 (moderate); 3 (severe); 4 (very severe)
            †Score:               0 (very loose/watery); 1 (loose); 2 (normal); 3 (hard); 4 (very hard/little balls)
                                                                                                                                        * P < 0.001
Drossman D, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:329-341.
            When to Change/Add Therapy for an
                  Unresponsive Patient?
    • No studies have examined this question1
    • Stepped Treatment Of Older adults on Laxatives
      (STOOL) trial was designed to investigate the efficacy of
      adding a second agent when the first constipation
      therapy failed2
        – It closed early with only 19 enrolled participants
    • In general, the prescribing clinician may elect to combine
      therapy depending on the patient’s response and
      lingering symptoms; recommended more often for
      patients with severe symptoms
    • Combine agents with different mechanisms of action,
      such as lubiprostone with senna, or an antispasmodic
      with a laxative for IBS-C
1. Gartlehner G, et al. Available at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/bookres.fcgi/constip/pdfconstip.pdf. 2007.
Accessed April, 2009.
2. Mihaylov S, et al. Health Technol Assess. 2008;12(13).
                               Post-Stroke Patient
Special Considerations
• Recent studies have reported constipation in 55% of patients at the
  acute stage (4 weeks)1, and in 30% ≥ 3 months2 following stroke
• Patient limitations
   – Positioning problems
   – Reduced peristalsis
   – Immobility
Treatment Strategy*
1. Appropriate assessment of bowel function, frequency, consistency
2. Tailor a specific bowel management program to facilitate/initiate
   defecation
3. Careful documentation with a bowel diary
4. Glycerin suppositories, laxatives, motility agents to promote
   defecation
 *Treatment strategy based on clinical experience
1.   Su Y, et al. Stroke. 2009;40:1304-1309.
2.   Bracci F, et al. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13(29):3967-3972.
                              Patient With Dementia
        Contributing Factors
        •    Immobility
        •    Dehydration
        •    Inadequate food intake
        •    Depression
        •    Cognitive deficits
        •    Cannot find the bathroom
        •    Inability to undress
        •    Cannot ask for help
        •    Cannot sense the urge to defecate
        •    Use of psychotropic drugs

        Treatment Strategy*
        1.   Appropriate assessment of bowel function
        2.   Establish a bowel routine, regular toileting program
        3.   Suppositories, stool softeners, bulking agents
        4.   Careful documentation (bowel diary, effectiveness of treatments, etc.)
        5.   Involve family or health care team (in a nursing facility)
        6.   Address nutritional/fluid needs

*Treatment strategy based on clinical experience
              Patients Treated With Opiates
   Special Considerations
   • Opioids inhibit GI propulsive motility and secretion
   • GI effects of opioids are mediated primarily by µ-opioid receptors within the
      bowel
   • Constipation is a common and troubling side effect
   • Patients do not develop tolerance to the effects of opiates on the bowel

   Treatment Strategy*
   1. Laxative therapy should be initiated proactively with start of opiate use
   2. Magnesium hydroxide, senna, lactulose, bisacodyl, stool softener
   3. A combination of a stimulant and stool softener is often required
   4. Laxative doses may need to be increased along with increased doses of
      opioids
   5. Titrate doses of laxatives according to response prior to changing to an
      alternative laxative
   6. When laxative therapy is inadequate, consider methylnaltrexone
*Treatment strategy based on clinical experience
Tamayo A, Diaz-Zuluaga P. Support Care Cancer. 2004;12:613-618.
Shaiova L, et al. Palliat Supp Care. 2007;5:161-166.
                   A Role for Peripheral µ-opioid
                      Receptor Antagonists?
     • Methylnaltrexone
           – Novel, quaternary µ-opioid receptor antagonist
           – Does not antagonize the central (analgesic) effects of opioids or
             precipitate withdrawal
           – FDA approved for treatment of opioid-induced constipation in
             patients with advanced illness, receiving palliative care, when
             laxative therapy has been inadequate
           – Subcutaneous injection; one dose (0.15 mg/kg) every other day
             as needed, no more than 1 dose in a 24 hr period
           – Abdominal pain and flatulence most common adverse events

Foss JF. Am J Surg. 2001;182 (5ASuppl):19S-26S.
Thomas J, et al. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:2332-2343.
Relistor [package insert]. Available at:
http://www.wyeth.com/content/showlabeling.asp?id=499. Accessed April 2009.
  Neurologic Disorders: Parkinson’s Disease
Special Considerations
• Constipation occurs in at least 2/3 of patients
• Multifactorial:
   – Slow colonic function
   – Defecatory dysfunction
   – Enteric and central nervous system
   – Antiparkinsonian medications
        Anticholinergic agents
        Dopaminergic agents
• Underlying illness is chronic and uncorrectable

Treatment Strategy*
1. Adjust medications if possible
2. Initiate pharmacologic therapy
    – May need to use medications from several classes
    – Osmotic laxatives, Cl channel activators, stimulant laxatives

*Treatment strategy based on clinical experience
Stark ME. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:567-574.
                              Chronic Constipation
                              Secondary to Diabetes
   Special Considerations
   • Constipation occurs in 20% of patients with diabetes
   • Related to duration of diabetes > 10 years
   • Diabetic autonomic neuropathy
   • Gastrocolic reflex may be absent, delayed, blunted
   • Constipation may be severe and can lead to megacolon

   Treatment Strategy*
   1. Optimize diabetes care
   2. Stepwise pharmacologic therapy
       – Exclude slow transit
       – Bulking agents, osmotic laxatives, Cl channel activators,
          stimulant laxatives
*Treatment strategy based on clinical experience

Verne GN, et al. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1998;27:861-874.
                                 Complications of
                               Chronic Constipation
      • Fecal impaction1,2
            – Identified in up to 40% of elderly adults hospitalized in United
              Kingdom
      • Intestinal volvulus/obstruction2
      • Urinary and fecal incontinence2
      • Stercoral ulceration/ischemia2
      • Bowel perforation2
      • Possible increased risk of colorectal cancer
        (controversial)3,4


1.   Read NW, et al. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1995;20:61-70.
2.   De Lillo AR, Rose S. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:901-905.
3.   Roberts MC, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:857.
4.   Dukas L, et al. Am J Epidemiol. 2000;151:958-964.
                                        Fecal Impaction
      Recognition/Identification
      • Maintain high level of vigilance for institutionalized patients or
         patients in the hospital
          – Absence of bowel movement, absence of bowel sounds
          – Fecal soiling, fecal incontinence of liquid stool
      • Assessment
          – Digital rectal exam
          – Abdominal x-ray
      Treatment Strategy*
      1. Prevention!!
      2. Treat from below
          • Enema, suppository
          • Manual disimpaction with prior pain medication
      3. Treat from above
          • Osmotic laxatives
      4. Institution of preventative measures
          • Diet, laxatives, bowel regimen
*Treatment strategy based on clinical experience
                          Emerging Therapies
    Prucalopride
          – Selective 5-HT4 agonist
          – Does not interact with 5-HT3 or 5-HT1B receptors
          – Increases colonic motility and transit
          – Phase 3 studies have demonstrated efficacy of 2 or 4 mg prucalopride
            in patients with severe chronic constipation
          – Adverse events included headache, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea


    Linaclotide
          – Guanylate cyclase agonist
          – Induces intestinal fluid secretion
          – Pilot study showed improved spontaneous bowel movement frequency
            and improved symptoms in patients with chronic constipation
          – Also being studied in patients with IBS-C


Camilleri M, et al. New Engl J Med. 2008;358:2344-2354.
Quigley E, et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29:315-328.
Tack J, et al. Gut. 2009;58:357-365.
Johnston J, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:125-132.
             Myths and Misconceptions About
                  Chronic Constipation
        Misconception                                            Reality
   Diseases arise from
   autointoxication by retained • No evidence to support this theory
   stools
                                     • Fluctuations in sex hormones during the menstrual
                                       cycle have minimal impact on constipation, but are
   Fluctuations in hormones
                                       associated with changes in other GI symptoms
   contribute to constipation
                                     • Changes in hormones during pregnancy may play
                                       a role in slowing gut transit
                                     • A low fiber diet may be a contributory factor in a
                                       subgroup of patients with constipation
   A diet poor in fiber causes       • Some patients may be helped by an increase in
   constipation                        dietary fiber, others with more severe constipation
                                       may get worse symptoms with increased dietary
                                       fiber intake
   Increasing fluid intake is a      • No evidence that constipation can be treated successfully
   successful treatment for            by increasing fluid intake unless there is evidence of
   constipation                        dehydration
Muller-Lissner S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:232-242.
Heitkemper M, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(2):420-430.
          More Misconceptions About Chronic
                    Constipation
       Misconception                                             Reality
    Stimulant laxatives
                                   • Unlikely that stimulant laxatives at recommended
    damage the enteric
                                     doses are harmful to the colon
    nervous system and
                                   • No data support the idea that stimulant laxatives are
    increase the risk of
                                     an independent risk factor for colorectal cancer
    cancer
    Laxatives cause                • Laxatives can cause electrolyte disturbances, but
    electrolyte                      appropriate drug and dose selection can minimize
    disturbances                     such effects
                                   • Tolerance is uncommon in most laxative users,
    Laxatives induce                 however tolerance to stimulant laxatives can occur in
    tolerance                        patients with severe constipation and slow colonic
                                     transit
    Laxatives are                  • No potential for addiction to laxatives, but laxatives
    addictive                        may be misused


Muller-Lissner S, et al. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:232-242.
 Patient and Caregiver Education
• Provide reassurance
• Engage patients/caregivers in a discussion of constipation
• Discuss medicines that can contribute to chronic
  constipation
• Discuss criteria for diagnosis, share a diagnostic algorithm
• Utilize patient questionnaire/symptom log
• Discuss treatment options, including
    – Common side effects
    – How long a treatment might take to work
    – Is it appropriate to request an alternative treatment?
• Answer questions!
• Emphasize the goals of treatment
    – Improve symptoms
    – Restore normal bowel function
    – Improve quality of life
                        Summary

• Chronic constipation is a common condition in the elderly

• Quality of life in elderly patients is negatively affected by
  the symptoms of chronic constipation and IBS-C

• Identify risk factors and secondary causes for constipation
• Be vigilant for red flags or alarm symptoms; directed
  tested may be necessary

• Main objective of treatment for chronic constipation is to
  improve patients’ symptoms, restore normal bowel
  function (≥ 3 bowel movements per week), improve
  quality of life
                    Summary (cont)
• Evidence-based therapeutic options for chronic constipation include
  psyllium, lactulose, polyethylene glycol, and lubiprostone

• Psyllium, polyethylene glycol, antibiotics, probiotics, antispasmodics,
  antidepressants, lubiprostone and psychotherapy are treatments for
  IBS-C with varying degrees of efficacy

• Long-term safety and efficacy data needed for therapeutic options
  for both chronic constipation and IBS-C, particularly in older (> 65)
  adults

• Careful recognition, assessment, treatment, and monitoring can lead
  to more effective patient-specific interventions that can reduce the
  burden of chronic constipation or IBS-C

								
To top