Get documents about "Model of Partnership Contract
W
Description
Model of Partnership Contract document sample
Document Sample
Community Engagement Survey
Survey Dates: October 8-15, 2009
COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH
IMPROVEMENT
Provisional Objectives
Health Across the Lifespan: Develop sustained partnerships that:
o Engage individuals and organizations affected by, interested in and/or have the capacity to affect
the issue
o Nurture strong relationships between individuals from across the community
o Foster mutual aspect, trust and understanding
o Demonstrate balanced power among all members
Health Equity: Develop and widely disseminate a dynamic toolbox resource that will:
o Dynamic resource
o References, resources, technology information.
o Describe a model partnership.
o Provide best practices for making a partnership successful such as who should be at the table.
o How to get them engaged
o Conflict resolution resources.
o What should be evaluated?
o Who else has a partnership working on a similar problem?
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
1 Member Focus Area Community Sector Each person is part of the Public Health System; and can work to build Assets in
Strategic Leadership all our children; be a caring neighbor; and ask what skills they can contibute to
Team (FAST) their community.
2 Member Focus Area Government (State Health Equity issues in this context should specifically include partnering with
Strategic Leadership or Local) folks who are already working on the fundamental social and economic
Team (FAST) determinants of health; including anti-poverty work; anti-racism work; job- and
economic-development work; community organizing; early childhood educational
work; etc.
3 Member Focus Area Government (State This area is too large; to extensive; and unreachable and unmeasurable. Choice a
Strategic Leadership or Local) priority based on community/local/county needs; partner with research and
Team (FAST) extension faculty and public health to design projects that will be reproducible
statewide.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 1 of 12
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
4 Active in community Nonprofit Sector Utilize culturally competent resource persons in the community who can be
health; Former Director trained to utilize the tool box; A tool box alone is only a tool to be utilized by
Minority Health program skilled and knowledgeable community resources. Provide resource for TA to utile
for large multi-state the resources effectively.
CBO; Former Chair;
Village of Shorewood
Health Commission
;;Registered for fall 2008
Community Engagement
forum;Member
Wisconsin Minority
Health Leadership
Council
5 Wisconsin Local Health Government (State The best way is to have optimal funding available that all partners would be able
Department Officer or Local) to access to do there part to complete the healthy community puzzle.Public Health
could be the driver of this healthy bus but instead of just doing minimal prevention
we could have healthy communities created.I believe that our partners all
understand what a healthy community is and why it is important to us;our families
and the future.
6 Wisconsin Tribal Chair Tribe Recognize the uniqueness of Tribes and Tribal government while preserving
or Tribal Health Director Tribal Sovereignty! The relationship is government to government not County to
Tribal Government!
7 Wisconsin Local Health Government (State
Department or Local)
Officer;Member
Wisconsin Public Health
Council or a standing
committee;Member
Focus Area Strategic
Leadership Team
(FAST)
8 Member Focus Area Private Sector increase number of research projects that focus on healthcare-community
Strategic Leadership organization partnerships across the lifespan
Team (FAST)
9 Member Focus Area Private Sector
Strategic Leadership
Team (FAST)
10 Non traditional public Nonprofit Sector
health worker
11 Registered for fall 2008 Nonprofit Sector Any way to bring young and old together. Face to Face interactions; in additional
Community Engagement to technology.
forum
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 2 of 12
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
12 WI Aging Government (State Require appropriate partners for every public health expenditure; share the
network;Wisconsin or Local) resources - money forges partnerships; provide recognition to effective
Department of Health partnerships. I don't see where a particular tool box will motivate people to
Services program or partner. Public health doesn't have a reputation of teamwork with other
management staff networks.Focus on results; not on process.
13 Registered for fall 2008 Nonprofit Sector *Convene Chronic Disease Statewide Summit -- work with Partnership to Fight
Community Engagement Chronic Disease*Link faith-based successful initiatives to public health initiatives
forum
14 Registered for fall 2008 Nonprofit Sector Encourage funding opportunities that require collaborative partnerships. Highlight
Community Engagement and recognize current; successful partnerships in Wisconsin. Continue to provide
forum opportunities for statewide collaboration around specific health topics.
15 Member Focus Area Nonprofit Sector Review existing information for various diseases/health issues to identify themes
Strategic Leadership for strategies in building community partnerships. Let's not recreate the wheel.
Team (FAST)
16 Registered for fall 2008 Government (State
Community Engagement or Local)
forum;Member
Wisconsin Public Health
Council or a standing
committee
17 Registered for fall 2008 Government (State Create a grassroots campaign that does not involve the government create
Community Engagement or Local) partnerships.
forum
18 Registered for fall 2008 Community Sector Marathon County has a good model; can be tweaked
Community Engagement
forum
19 Registered for fall 2008 Nonprofit Sector Since being involved with community partnerships for the past 15 years; I think
Community Engagement the key issue is funding to provide staff who serve as the key contact for any
forum partnership. Having a group of volunteers and community representatives at the
table with local non-profits; governmental agencies and business is exciting and
energizing BUT to do good collaborative work funding is needed to lead the
projects.
20 Member Focus Area Nonprofit Sector Develop partnerships with people that may not consider themselves part of the
Strategic Leadership public health workforce. These non traditional groups and organizations can add
Team (FAST) strenght to the public health voice and mission.
21 Member Focus Area Community Sector Involve individuals and communities affected by a particular health issue from the
Strategic Leadership beginning. Funding for training and to assist communities working on health
Team (FAST) issues
22 Director of Community Nonprofit Sector The key to this objective is incentives. Where there are incentives; action will
Free Clinic follow.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 3 of 12
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
23 Member Wisconsin Nonprofit Sector Coordination of current efforts would go a long way toward accessing additional
Public Health Council or resources and developing improved community-public partnerships. KU's toolbox
a standing is a great resource. Also need to have improved networking/communication so
committee;Member that efforts are coordinated and aligned.
Focus Area Strategic
Leadership Team
(FAST)
24 Member Focus Area Government (StateCreate funding structures that encourage and support collaborations over
Strategic Leadership or Local) independent activities. The funding needs to include the time and resources it
Team (FAST) takes to create the partnership; and not just support the outcomes of the
partnership. Those outcomes take time in addition to the formation of the
partnerships.
25 Chair; Wisconsin Government (State 1. Many counties currently engage in CHIP (Community Health Improvement
Prevention Network; or Local) Process)bringing together key stakeholders from all sectors of the community to
Member; SCAODA establish local health priorities. This initiative needs to be sustained and
Prevention supported by tools and resources like those outlined in the objective.2. Contract
Committee;Registered with the Wisconsin Clearinghouse for Prevention Resources to offer technical
for fall 2008 Community assistance and training in building and sustaining strong local coalitions. 3. An
Engagement forum annual state CHIP conference for those active in local CHIP efforts to share
information and receive training in best practices
26 Member Wisconsin Community Sector Everyone needs to be importantly involved. This includes providers; front line
Public Health Council or staff; community members; patients; and academic and public health
a standing committee professionals. Data needs to be collected from marginalized groups to determine
their specific needs to produce equity.
27 Member Wisconsin Nonprofit Sector Considering all stakeholders; indentify small and large stakeholders involved or to
Public Health Council or be impacted by the target group. Determine obstacles in access to these groups.
a standing committee Determine communication avenues to reach target population/goal group. Involve
goal group.
28 Registered for fall 2008 Government (State Our county has a good track record for collaboration which has accomplished
Community Engagement or Local) much. However; competition is still high among some agencies based on funding
forum and reimbursement.
29 Registered for fall 2008 Nonprofit Sector Conducting collaboration trainings. This was done about 5 years ago and I
Community Engagement learned so much from it. I think another training would be a wonderful way to
forum bring these people together and start building on ideas. Also using the TOPS
facilitation method would allow all ideas to be respectfully submitted and
represented.
30 Member Focus Area Government (State Free up the two Medical School's Partnership Funds to support all partnerships;
Strategic Leadership or Local) not just collaborations involving their own faculty.
Team (FAST)
31 Member Focus Area Government (State 1.) Engage the affected communities within the solutions brought forth; 2. Bring in
Strategic Leadership or Local) community leaders to draw attention to the issues and rally their followers; 3.)
Team (FAST) Come from a framework of respect and resilency;
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 4 of 12
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
32 Member Focus Area Public Sector (Non- *The DHS put out a tool kit for coalition development; strategic planning; etc. as
Strategic Leadership Government) part of the SPF-SIG grants for alcohol work. One way to make sure
Team (FAST) funding/resources go to effective community partnerships is to require that they
demonstrate they have gone through these processes prior to funding.*Train
county public health workers in effective coalition development through this toolkit.
33 expert panel Nonprofit Sector
member;Registered for
fall 2008 Community
Engagement
forum;Member Focus
Area Strategic
Leadership Team
(FAST)
34 Member Wisconsin Private Sector
Public Health Council or
a standing committee
35 Representative; Nonprofit Sector Develop toolbox and provide regional or local trainings for utilization and
Comprehensive Cancer implementation. Hold all partners accountable.
Control (CDC & State
funded)
coalition;Registered for
fall 2008 Community
Engagement forum
36 Member Focus Area Nonprofit Sector Literature on community based participatory research will provide answers to the
Strategic Leadership question on evaluation. Obtain baseline data from community members to assess
Team (FAST) their attitudes; expectations and understandings of community-
governmental/academic;etc relationships. Constant and meaningful
communications. Interviews or focus groups at crucial times in the partnership to
assess progress. Seek funding to support the community involvement in this
process. Have staff members dedicated solely to community engagement.
37 County Administrator Government (State A strong core group and utilize a train the trainer approach to move the concepts
or Local) into the community so there is civic engagement to change the community.
38 Registered for fall 2008 Public Sector (Non- i'm running out of time so can't answer as i can't figure out how to save this
Community Engagement Government)
forum
39 Wisconsin Department Government (State Provide resources and networking opportunities for various partners serving the
of Health Services or Local) community. For example; food pantry staff should have the resources available to
program or management connect their patrons with health care information - likewise; health care clinics
staff should have the resources available to connect their patients with food assistance
programs such as FoodShare and WIC.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 5 of 12
# Group Sector What do you suggest are the best ways to move these objectives forward?
40 Registered for fall 2008 Public Sector (Non- Funding to support activities to develop the objectives
Community Engagement Government)
forum
41 Registered for fall 2008 Government (State correct bullet 3 under the first objective.Suggestion: clarify the scope of what
Community Engagement or Local) public health itself can be held accountable for and then ask for commitments
forum;Member Focus from other partners for accountability.
Area Strategic
Leadership Team
(FAST)
42 Member Wisconsin Voluntary Sector Need to develop the need for partnerships or the vision as to how partnerships
Public Health Council or benefis all on specific projects. Need to develop community leaders that specialize
a standing committee in and develop partnerships for community needs
43 Registered for fall 2008 Government (State
Community Engagement or Local)
forum
44 Member Focus Area Nonprofit Sector
Strategic Leadership
Team (FAST)
45 Member Focus Area Nonprofit Sector Increase emphasis on evaluation of partnerships; and dissemination of
Strategic Leadership information for others to learn how to develop good partnership; and high
Team (FAST) functioning partnerships.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 6 of 12
Community Engagement Survey
Survey Dates: October 8-15, 2009
COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIPS FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH
IMPROVEMENT
Lifeline Question
What do you think about having a community toolbox like university of Kansas? Is it useful? Would it help if we took some of
their tools and adapted them to Wisconsin?
# Lifeline Question
1 I am not familiar with this. I think the ministries can be helpful here.
2
3 I have no knowledge of Kansas but know that Wisconsin has fragmented; conflicting systems that overlap and have no incentives
for partnership. Each hunkers down in its own silo and has no reason for collaboration. There are few models and no financial or
organizational incentives to cooperate.To acheive this goal would require a state level restructuring of public health and the
practicing community.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 7 of 12
# Lifeline Question
4 Not familiar with this particular resource; kow of others similar to description
5 Not familiar with this
6 Yes with adequate input from Tribes.
7 I think that if the toolbox can be adapted to Wisconsin; it is a great tool.
8
9 I was not familiar with it; so I went online and looked through the materials. I don't see any reason to duplicate the CTB or
Wisconsin-ize it. The materials; as is; are meant to be somewhat generic (across topical areas). The authors' intentions seem to
be to have a single point of access for this growing repository; so why would we duplicate/replicate them??
10
11 It has potential
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 8 of 12
# Lifeline Question
12 Don't know what the toolbox is. Public health needs to develop an ethos of partnership that hasn't been evident. Public health needs
to let others lead when appropriate. Public health needs to focus mopre on results and less on process.
13 I have not reviewed this resource; however; am a strong supporter of expanding best practice as long as target populations are
similiar.
14
15 We have a toolbox for our local coalitions; but I don't think many of them utilize the resources. What seems to be the most effective
is providing opportunities to people to network and collaborate.
16 I think it would be wonderful.
17 Why reinvent the wheel; they seem to have good ideas that could be adopted for Wisconsin
18 No knowledge
19 Providing another tool box only begins the work. Sustaining work needs funds using small competitive grants beyond the minimal
provided by the Health WI Partnership program.
20 We have some of these already
21 It's fine having and adapting a toolbox but without the community receiving training and knowing how to use those tools--too much
money just get wasted.
22
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 9 of 12
# Lifeline Question
23 See above. KU's toolbox is very useful. You should include the link to the toolbox in this question!
24 These integrated tools are nice. Be sure to not reinvent the wheel. Do not feel that we need to be new and original. Use what is
already available in order to save time and money.
25 This is an excellent idea. KU's Community Toolbox is an excellent resource.
26 Adapting existing models and strategies is an excellent idea.
27 Not sure what this looks like.
28 I have not seen the community tool box - but I will look at it.
29 the CTB by U of Kansas is a wonderful resource. This could be kicked off with the collaboration training I mentioned above.
30 It may be helpful; but too much process work bogs down grassroots efforts.
31 Hard to say as I don't know what the toolbox has in it. But; anything that is used in another State must be adapted and tested in
Wisconsin; and in different communities within Wisconsin ethnic communities. Just because it worked in Kansas; the same thing
might not work in say; Milwaukee or Oskosh.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 10 of 12
# Lifeline Question
32
33 It would help to use what they already have.
34 Yes; we could use something like this. But why recreate the wheel? There is so much good stuff out there now; we should just
organize it or help someone else organize their's and piggyback on it.
35 There are many resources on partnerships already available. Would support not reinventing the wheel -- for saving resources and
faster implementation.
36 YES!
37 Positive approach. Yes; Yes.
38 for aoda; i think we have begun this but centralizing it with the clearinghouse - if it's still around - would be a good thing
39
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 11 of 12
# Lifeline Question
40 Always better not to recreate the wheel
41 don't know - not familiar with the toolbox
42 Need info on the Kansas Community Toolbox Under provisional objectives: for Collaborative objectives the first Obj. under Health
equity doesn't make sense; What is meant by Dynamic Resource? Do you mean Function as a Dynamic Resource?
43 Absolutely; Wisconsin needs this.
44 Perhaps do some sort of assessment to compare what would be especially valuable to Wisconsin partnerships. Also; it will be
essential to market whatever resource is referenced or developed; so people know it exists; how to use it; etc.
45 I think the more resources that are available; the better. I would recommend they be adapted for Wisconsin.
cc85543c-2c12-4d98-8a12-1b3ef53b886a.xls Page 12 of 12
Related docs
Other docs by khu68458
