Documents
Resources
Learning Center
Upload
Plans & pricing Sign in
Sign Out

Etika bisnis

VIEWS: 647 PAGES: 4

  • pg 1
									                           TUGAS ETIKA BISNIS
                             BY Teddy Dunggio


       LOVE AND A QUESTION: WHAT SHOULD THE CPA DO?



1. Q: What should Todd do?

   A: Todd must persuade his wife (Carried) to think it over by telling or reporting
   the cash sales of that day to the accountant (Harold Heywood), because there
   would be a great deal of risks if she didn’t report that. Besides, Todd already told
   her the rules of tax sales/income tax, and even though Carrie was being asked (by
   Mrs. Cook) wasn’t a good practice, it’s kind of fraud (hiding sales fraud, by not
   reporting the cash sales, it would reduce income, then the tax of that income
   would be lower than it was supposed to be).

   Q: What is Todd’s responsibility to the profession?

   A: Todd had the obligation as an up-coming CPA to tell the truth and applied
   what he already learnt in the accounting school (because he already knew the
   rules of good practice of accounting, it was proven by being already passed the
   examination of becoming CPA. Even though he must wait until he got enough
   experiences to earn his CPA). Especially what he already learnt in accounting
   school are ethic codes of being CPA, some of them are Integrity and objectivity/
   conflict of interests (not having certain interest because of special relationship
   with that PIC).

   Q: What is Todd’s responsibility to Carrie?

   A: As a husband, Todd must love and protect Carrie (as the wife) from any harm
   and also support her career. But in this case, in term of protecting Carrie from
   any harm, then Todd must warn Carrie about hiding some sales and hiding tax
   income could be considered as the attempt of breaking the law, there will be a
   greater risk i.e: going to jail (even though Carrie is just a staff, she could be
   considered as the accomplice of Mrs. Cook in income tax fraud/sales fraud)

2. Q: Does it make any difference if Todd is not yet a CPA?

   A: It doesn’t make any difference if Todd isn’t a CPA yet. The reason he isn’t a
   CPA yet is that he must wait until he gets enough experience to earn his CPA. He
   already passed the CPA exam and he already went to the accounting school. It
   means that he already knows the rules and he knows what are the good practices
   in accounting. He must have learned the principles and ethic codes of becoming a
   CPA, then he must apply what he learns when he faces issues with accounting
   problem.

3. Q: Is Todd obligated to take action based on a formal code of professional ethics?

   A: Yes, Todd is obligated to take action regarding to a formal code of
   professional ethics. Applying what he learns in his school and what he knows are
   the best practice and test for him to uphold the rules or professional ethics. CPA
   is just a title or a piece of certificate but what counts more in becoming a CPA is
   how an accountant can carry and do as his/her responsibilities as a CPA. But
   what he could do only to give advice, because he didn’t have the authority as the
   auditor (legally) of that case.

4. Q: Should Todd ask advice of a principal in his firm?

   A: If he couldn’t persuade his wife to tell the truth and not to get involved in
   income tax/sales fraud, yes, Todd could ask some advice from a principal in his
   firm. Maybe that principal had a better solution.

5. Q: What rules of confidentiality are involved?

   A: In this case rules of confidentiality is involved, In IFAC Code of ethics :
   section 140:7, “the following are circumstances where professional accountants
   are or may be required to disclose confidential information or when such
   disclosure may be appropriate:
       a. Disclosure is permitted by law and it’s authorized by the client or the
           employer”.
   Because in this issue he wasn’t the one who directly got involved in the situation
   or he legally appointed to become the auditor or the accountant of that case and
   also he didn’t have the authorization from Mrs. Cook, so he couldn’t disclose the
   issue to anybody.

6. Q: Should Todd, as a professional courtesy, discuss the matter with Harold
   Heywood?

   A: Yes, he could discuss the matter with Harold Heywood (the accountant), but
   Todd mustn’t tell the subject of that matter (which was Mrs. Cook). He must
   pretend that the matter came from another shop (must keep some information just
   to himself)

   Q: What if he knows Heywood is a close friend of Mr. Cook?

   A: Even though he knows that Heywood is a close friend of Mr. Cook, he still can
   discuss the matter, but as long as he keeps certain kind of the information to
   himself (such as: the subject : Mrs. Cook, the shop name, and the informant), just
   pretend that the matter comes from other shop and from other person.
7. Q: In considering broader ethical issues, who is harmed by Mrs. Cook’s current
   practice, if it is being used to avoid the recognition of income?

   A: The one who is being harmed is Carrie, because if Carrie helps that kind of
   practice, she can be considered as the accomplice of Mrs. Cook.
   Mr. Heywood can be harmed too, because what he calculates as an accountant so
   far is wrong. He will have bad image either because of this.

8. Q: What are the personal and professional benefits or the consequences if Todd
   takes action on his knowledge?

   A: If Todd takes action on his knowledge then Carrie will get out of the hook as
   becoming the accomplice of Mrs. Cook, because he can testify that Carrie didn’t
   know what she did was wrong, so Todd has the obligation to tell the truth and
   rules to Carrie and ask his wife not to break the law.
   The consequences are:
   a). Carrie (his wife) will get upset because her dream to buy into the business (as
   partner) will disappear,
   b). Carrie will lose her job, so Todd’s household will only has one source of
   income which is from Todd only.

   Q: What if he takes no action? Think of this in terms of Todd, of Carrie, of
   Todd’s Firm, of Heywood, of the general public.

   A: If Todd doesn’t take any action,
   In term of Todd: it means Todd isn’t the real CPA, because he doesn’t apply what
   he already learns from his school besides he doesn’t uphold ethic codes as the
   CPA.
   In term of Carrie: Carrie will be glad and happy because she intends to buy into
   the business to become the partner of Mrs. Cook
   In term of Todd’s firm: it means that Todd’s firm has hired a wrong person to
   become an accounting staff, because Todd can’t uphold ethic codes as the CPA.
   In term of Heywood: Heywood doesn’t know what the real sales and tax income
   must be reported. It means that Heywood doesn’t do his job well. It can give him
   bad name.
   In term of general public: If General public doesn’t know about what is the real
   situation, then maybe some of the public wants to invest in that shop or also wants
   to become a partner, he/she will be trapped in this fraud, and she/he won’t get
   her/his real dividend because of this fraud.

9. Q: What should Todd do about his information if the CPA firm for which he
   works is hired to do Mrs. Cook tax work?

   A: Todd must make the tax calculation based on the real income and sales.
10. Q: What should Todd do about his information if the CPA firm for which he
    works is hired to audit Mrs. Cook?

   A: Todd must report his findings to the firm and also to Mrs. Cook, and make
   recommendation what is the best practice and make the tax calculation based on
   the real income. Also show what kind of rules that Mrs. Cook already breaks if
   she keeps doing what she does and also tells her the consequences either.

								
To top