View and Print this Publication - Effects of Alternative Thinning Treatments on Tree Grades at Three Upland Hardwood Sites in Kentucky and Ohio: 30 Year Results

Click to download
Reviews
Shared by: ForestService
Stats
views:
28
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
6/17/2008
language:
pages:
0
EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE THINNING TREATMENTS ON TREE GRADES AT THREE UPLAND HARDWOOD SITES IN KENTUCKY AND OHIO: 30 YEAR RESULTS John Brown, Gary W. Miller, and Kurt W. Gottschalk† ABSTRACT.—Results of this study examine the effects of a wide variety of thinning treatments with respect to potential tree grade distribution of white oak (Quercus alba L.). Data for this analysis was collected 30 years after study establishment from two sites in Kentucky and one site in southeastern Ohio. Potential tree grade distributions were analyzed using generalized logistic regression and where appropriate, cumulative logistic regression. Thinning was found to have a statistically significant effect at the two Kentucky sites—Mckee and Baldrock—but found to have no effect at the Ohio site—Mead. Statistical contrasts of thinning treatments at the Mckee site indicated that the moderate thinning had decreased odds for poorer quality trees as compared to the odds of poorer quality trees in the severe thinning. Results for the Baldrock site were an even stronger indicator that less intensive thinning produced higher quality white oak trees. Contrasts here demonstrated that the Very Light, Moderate/Light 2nd and Moderate/Moderate 2nd treatments all had increased odds for better quality trees than did the severe treatment. No statistical differences were found among thinning treatments for potential grade at the Mead site, which had a narrower range of reduction in initial basal area among treatments. Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank the staff at the USDA Forest Service RWU-4153 for long term monitoring and measuring of these stands. Additional funding for data analysis was provided by the National Hardwood Lumber Association. †Mathematical Statistician (JPB)USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 241 Mercer Springs Rd., Princeton, WV, 24740), Research Forester (GWM) and Project Leader (KWG)USDA Forest Service, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 180 Canfield St., Morgantown, WV 26505 502 Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference GTR-NE-316

Related docs
Other docs by ForestService
Pennoyer v Neff
Views: 609  |  Downloads: 8
McGuire v Almy_Brief
Views: 373  |  Downloads: 5
app007
Views: 116  |  Downloads: 0
Peterson Goetz
Views: 187  |  Downloads: 0
High School Glossary
Views: 473  |  Downloads: 18
When We All Get to Heaven
Views: 311  |  Downloads: 1
dv101v
Views: 151  |  Downloads: 0
at180
Views: 115  |  Downloads: 0
Hannan v Dusch
Views: 463  |  Downloads: 10
You Have Been Good
Views: 265  |  Downloads: 0
Angel Ruble Forrest Products Dyer
Views: 318  |  Downloads: 0
Massage Therapy for Subacute Low-Back Pain
Views: 742  |  Downloads: 26
Schedule of equipment
Views: 214  |  Downloads: 5
Hamer Harris
Views: 183  |  Downloads: 0
civ050
Views: 127  |  Downloads: 0