Docstoc

Thin-Flap LASIK

Document Sample
Thin-Flap LASIK Powered By Docstoc
					                                                                                                             COVER STORY


                            Thin-Flap LASIK:
    How Thin Should
       We Go?             A 100-µm flap is safely within stromal tissue but preserves
                                more underlying stroma than standard flaps.
                                                  BY MICHAEL C. KNORZ, MD




I
     n the early days of LASIK, thin flaps were considered the
     gold standard. However, after the appearance of com-
     plications including flap folds and irregularities, the
     trend moved toward thicker flaps in the hopes of
reducing postoperative side effects.1 Microkeratome-related
complications subsequently decreased; however, surgical
complications continued.
   Over the past 2 years, we have begun to see a resurgence        Figure 1. Schematic drawing of an inverted sidecut.
of the thin flap, which has been driven by the growing need
to preserve the stroma for both higher correction capabili-           Microkeratomes create a meniscus-shaped flap.
ties and safety reasons, such as avoiding keratectasia. The        Femtosecond lasers, on the other hand, generate planar
precision of modern laser keratomes, including the                 flaps that are uniformly thick across the cornea.3 Generally
IntraLase femtosecond laser (Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.,        speaking, planar flaps cut by the femtosecond laser mini-
Irvine, California), has enabled us to consistently cut flaps as   mize corneal weakening.
thin as 90 µm. This begs the question: How thin should we             Tran et al4 confirmed that planar flaps have less biome-
go to promote the safest results for our patients?                 chanical effect on the cornea compared with mechanical
                                                                   microkeratome-created flaps. Measurable spherical aberra-
BI OMECHANICS                                                      tions were noted in patients treated with the Hansatome
   To adequately answer this question, we must first consid-       microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb, Rochester, New York);
er corneal biomechanics. According to Marshall et al,2 the         however, no aberrations were seen in patients treated with
anterior-most 160 µm of corneal stroma is much stronger            the IntraLase.
than the deeper stroma. Additionally, the mid-periphery
(8–12 mm) is stronger than the central region (6 mm) of            SIDECUT DE SIGN
the cornea. Therefore, we must ensure we are creating the              Another question regarding post-LASIK corneal function
flap cut as superficially as possible—especially in the mid-       is the role of sidecut design. The iFS Advanced Femtosecond
periphery—to maintain the integrity of the cornea.                 Laser (Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.) can customize the
                   TAKE-HOME MESSAGE                               sidecut for each patient. But does the sidecut angle matter
                                                                   clinically? According to the latest research, it does.
  • The thin flap has once again become popular for LASIK              Marshall et al5 found that a steeper sidecut (70º) weak-
  because it preserves the stroma.                                 ened the cornea more than an inverted sidecut (150º; Figure
  • A superficial flap cut maintains the corneal integrity.        1). One explanation for this is that the beveled edge of the
                                                                   flap is tucked under the lip of the peripheral stroma in an
  • A steep sidecut weakens the cornea more than an
                                                                   inverted sidecut (Figure 1), preserving the strongest part of
  inverted sidecut.
                                                                   the cornea. Marshall concluded that shallow sidecuts weak-

                                                                     OCTOBER 2008 I CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE I 1
   COVER STORY


     en the cornea because supportive superficial fibers are sev-        performing thin-flap LASIK because it creates predictable,
     ered; however, inverted sidecuts at 150º inflict less biome-        uniform, planar flaps. The inverted sidecut may also
     chanical change. Marshall’s findings have since been replicat-      enhance thinner flaps. Lastly, to prevent flap folds that result
     ed (see How Can We Influence Flap Healing?).6                       from overstretching, laser energy should be set accordingly
                                                                         to achieve easy flap separation. ■
     M AKING A THINNER FL AP
        We have established: (1) the mid-periphery of the cornea           Michael C. Knorz, MD, is a Professor of
     must stay as intact as possible, (2) femtosecond lasers create      Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Medical
     planar flaps that promote corneal stability, and (3) inverted       Faculty Mannheim, and the Medical Director of
     sidecuts maximize corneal strength. Now, we can discuss             the FreeVis LASIK Centre, Mannheim, Germany.
     how thin to make a flap.                                            He states that he is a consultant to Advanced
        No studies have tested the efficacy of thin versus thick         Medical Optics, Inc. Dr. Knorz is a member of the CRST
     LASIK flaps; however, two retrospective studies speculate           Europe Editorial Board. He may be reached at tel: +49 621 383
     that 100-µm flaps provide visual quality as good as or better       3410; e-mail: knorz@eyes.de.
     than thick flaps.7,8 Thin flaps also (1) weaken the cornea less,
                                                                         1. Knorz MC. Flap and interface complications in LASIK. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology.
     (2) make less biomechanical impact, and (3) leave more stro-        2002;13:242-245.
     ma for ablation. Thick flaps are more stable and have less          2. Marshall J. Mechanical strength of the cornea after femtosecond laser penetrating keratoplasty.
     tendency to form microfolds; however, they are also more            Poster presented at the: ASCRS Annual Meeting; April 4-9, 2008; Chicago.
                                                                         3. Stahl JA, Durrie DS, Schwendeman FJ, Boghossian AJ. Anterior segment OCT analysis of thin
     harmful to corneal stability and limit higher corrections.          IntraLase femtosecond flaps. J Refract Surg. 2007;23:555-558.
        With the depth of the epithelium approximately 50 µm             4. Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z, Garufis C, Duh YH, Soltes CR, Juhasz T, Kurtz RM. Randomized
                                                                         prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation
     to 60 µm and Bowman’s layer 10 µm, we could theoretically           in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract
     create a flap as thin as 70 to 80 µm; however, the thickness        Surg. 2005;31:97-105.
                                                                         5. Marshall J. Sub-Bowman keratomileusis versus conventional LASIK. Paper presented at the:
     of the epithelium varies between individuals, and applana-          ASCRS Annual Meeting; April 6, 2008; Chicago.
     tion cones have a certain variability, too. For this reason,        6. Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength with the Amadeus micro-
                                                                         keratome and the IntraLase 150 kHz femtosecond laser with different side-cut configurations in rab-
     using a flap thickness of 100 µm provides a margin of safety        bits. J Refract Surg. [In Press.]
     with which I am comfortable.                                        7. Cobo-Soriano R, Calvo MA, Beltran J, Llovet FL, Baviera J. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis:
        Rather than standard flap thickness (range, 130–160 µm),         analysis of contrast sensitivity, visual, and refractive outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg.
                                                                         2005;31:1357-1365.
     I recommend 100-µm flaps cuts made with the femtosec-               8. Nassaralla BA, McLeod SD, Boteon JE, Nassaralla JJ. The effect of hinge position and depth plate
     ond laser. I believe a femtosecond laser is mandatory when          on the rate of recovery of corneal sensation following LASIK. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005;139:118-124.

                                              HOW CAN WE INFLUENCE FLAP HEALING?

                         By Michael C. Knorz, MD                         adherence than the mechanical microkeratome. In the two
                                                                         70º sidecut flap groups and the inverted 150º sidecut flap
          In a recent animal study, we investigated the effect of        group, an average of 492 g, 444 g, and 687 g of force, respec-
       three variables on the strength of flap adhesion: (1) flap        tively, were needed. The inverted flaps were nearly 1.5 times
       technology, (ie, mechanical microkeratome vs femtosecond          stronger than the 70º flaps; consequently, sidecut energy did
       laser), (2) sidecut design, and (3) sidecut energy.1              not have a significant effect on adherence. Flaps produced
          Seventeen New Zealand white rabbits underwent LASIK            with the Amadeus II dehisced on average under 210 g of
       with either a mechanical microkeratome (Amadeus II;               force. The difference in flap adhesion strength between the
       Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland) or a femtosecond laser        mechanical microkeratome group and all three femtosecond
       (iFS; Advanced Medical Optics, Inc.). The latter group was        laser groups was statistically significant.
       further divided into three groups. Two of these groups               In this study, we learned that flap adhesion is approximately
       received 70º sidecuts, one at the standard 0.8 mJ power and       2.5 times stronger with iFS-created flaps compared with
       the other at 1.6 mJ; and one group received inverted 150º         Amadeus II-created flaps. Additionally, sidecut energy did not
       sidecuts at 0.8 mJ.                                               appear to influence the strength of adhesion. Lastly—and most
          After 75 days, the animals were sacrificed and the epitheli-   importantly—an inverted 150º sidecut yielded a stronger flap
       um was removed. After gluing an acrylic lens onto the flap, a     adhesion (1.5 times) compared with the normal 70º sidecut.
       tension meter was used to dehisce the flaps, and the force
                                                                         1. Knorz MC, Vossmerbaeumer U. Comparison of flap adhesion strength with the
       required to accomplish dehiscence was recorded.                   Amadeus microkeratome and the IntraLase 150 kHz femtosecond laser with different side-
          Overall, the femtosecond laser created flaps with stronger     cut configurations in rabbits. J Refract Surg. [In Press.]




2 I CATARACT & REFRACTIVE SURGERY TODAY EUROPE I OCTOBER 2008

				
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Tags: lasik
Stats:
views:75
posted:4/10/2011
language:English
pages:2