# ASD-vs-LRFD

Document Sample

```					General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD
Hamid Zand
GT STRUDL Users Group Las Vegas, Nevada June 22-25, 2005

1

AISC ASD and LRFD
• AISC = American Institute of Steel Construction • ASD = Allowable Stress Design AISC Ninth Edition

• LRFD = Load and Resistance Factor Design AISC Third Edition
2

AISC Steel Design Manuals
• • • • 1963 AISC ASD 6th Edition 1969 AISC ASD 7th Edition 1978 AISC ASD 8th Edition 1989 AISC ASD 9th Edition

• 1986 AISC LRFD 1st Edition • 1993 AISC LRFD 2nd Edition • 1999 AISC LRFD 3rd Edition
3

ASD and LRFD Major Differences
• Load Combinations and load factors • ASD results are based on the stresses and LRFD results are based on the forces and moments capacity • Static analysis is acceptable for ASD but nonlinear geometric analysis is required for LRFD • Beams and flexural members • Cb computation
4

• 1.0D + 1.0L • 0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75W • 0.75D + 0.75L + 0.75E

D L W E

= = = =

5

Or you can use following load combinations with the parameter ALSTRINC to account for the 1/3 allowable increase for the wind and seismic load • • • • 1.0D + 1.0L 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E PARAMETER \$ ALSTRINC based on the % increase • ALSTRINC 33.333 LOADINGS 2 3
6

• • • • •
D L W E

1.4D 1.2D + 1.6L 1.2D + 1.6W + 0.5L 1.2D ± 1.0E + 0.5L 0.9D ± (1.6W or 1.0E)
7

Deflection Load Combinations for ASD and LRFD
• 1.0D + 1.0L • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0W • 1.0D + 1.0L + 1.0E

D L W E

= = = =

8

Forces and Stresses
• ASD = actual stress values are compared to the AISC allowable stress values

• LRFD = actual forces and moments are compared to the AISC limiting forces and moments capacity
9

• Comparison is between Table 1 of the AISC ASD 9th Edition on Page 1-7 versus Table 2-1 of the AISC LRFD 3rd Edition on Page 2-24 • A529 Gr. 42 of ASD, not available in LRFD • A529 Gr. 50 and 55 are new in LRFD • A441 not available in LRFD • A572 Gr. 55 is new in LRFD • A618 Gr. I, II, & III are new in LRFD • A913 Gr. 50, 60, 65, & 70 are new in LRFD • A992 (Fy = 50, Fu = 65) is new in LRFD (new standard) • A847 is new in LRFD
10

Slenderness Ratio
• Compression KL/r ≤ 200

• Tension L/r ≤ 300

11

Tension Members
• Check L/r ratio • Check Tensile Strength based on the crosssection’s Gross Area • Check Tensile Strength based on the crosssection’s Net Area

12

Tension Members
ASD ft = FX/Ag ≤ Ft ft = FX/Ae ≤ Ft LRFD Pu = FX ≤ ϕt Pn = ϕt Ag Fy Pu = FX ≤ ϕt Pn = ϕt Ae Fu
ϕt = 0.9 for Gross Area ϕt = 0.75 for Net Area
13

Gross Area Net Area

Tension Members
ASD Gross Area Net Area LRFD Gross Area Net Area
(ASD Section D1)

Ft = 0.6Fy Ft = 0.5Fu
(LRFD Section D1)

ϕt P n = ϕt F y A g ϕt Pn = ϕt Fu Ae

ϕt = 0.9 ϕt = 0.75
14

Compare ASD to LRFD
ASD LRFD 1.0D + 1.0L 1.2D + 1.6L

0.6Fy (ASD) × (1.5) = 0.9Fy (LRFD) 0.5Fu (ASD) × (1.5) = 0.75Fu (LRFD) ASD × (1.5) = LRFD
15

Tension Members
FIXED JOINT

Y Z X o -400.

16

Tension Members
• Member is 15 feet long • Fixed at the top of the member and free at the bottom • Loadings are: • Self weight • 400 kips tension force at the free end • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
17

Tension Members
ASD W18x46 LRFD W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989
18

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989

Tension Members
ASD W18x46 FX = 400.688 kips LRFD W10x49 FX = 640.881 kips Area = 13.5 in.2 Ratio = 0.989

Area = 14.4 in.2 Ratio = 0.989

19

Tension Members
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 640.881 / 400.688 = 1.599 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD = (1.5) × ASD Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD
6 4 0 .8 8 1 1 . 0 0 . 9 8 9 A r e a f o r L R F D = 1 3 .5 × × × = 1 4 .3 9 5 4 0 0 . 6 8 8 1 .5 0 . 9 8 9

LRFD

W10x49

Area = 14.4 in.2
20

Tension Members
Code Check based on the ASD9 and using W10x49

FX = 400.734 kips

Ratio = 0.928

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 640.881 / 400.734 = 1.599
6 4 0 .8 8 1 1 . 0 L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D = 0 .9 2 8 × × = 0 .9 8 9 4 0 0 . 7 3 4 1 .5

LRFD

W10x49

Ratio = 0.989

21

Tension Members
ASD
Example # 1 Live Load = 400 kips W18x46 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.989

LRFD
Example # 1 Live Load = 400 kips W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989 Example # 2 Dead Load = 200 kips Live Load = 200 kips W14x43 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.989 Code check W14x43 based on the ASD9 W14x43 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 1.06
22

Compression Members
• Check KL/r ratio • Compute Flexural-Torsional Buckling and Equivalent (KL/r)e • Find Maximum of KL/r and (KL/r)e • Compute Qs and Qa based on the b/t and h/tw ratios • Based on the KL/r ratio, compute allowable stress in ASD or limiting force in LRFD
23

Compression Members
ASD fa = FX/Ag ≤ Fa LRFD Pu = FX ≤ ϕc Pn = ϕc Ag Fcr
Where ϕc = 0.85
24

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements
ASD
b/t = 9 5 /
F
y

h/tw = 2 5 3 /

F

y

LRFD
b/t = 0 . 5 6 E / F
y

h/tw = 1 . 4 9 E / F

y

25

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD
b/t = 9 5 / LRFD b/t = 9 5 . 3 6 / F
y

F

y

h/tw = 2 5 3 /

F

y

h/tw = 2 5 3 . 7 4 /

F

y
26

Compression Members
ASD
KL/r ≤ C′c
2  KL / r)  ( F y Q 1 − 2  2 C c′    = 3 5 3(K L / r ) (K L / r ) + − 3 3 8 C c′ 8 C c′

(ASD E2-1 or A-B5-11)

F

a

W h ere

C c′ =

2π 2E Q Fy

LRFD

λ c Q ≤ 1 .5

(LRFD A-E3-2)
Q λc2

F

cr

= Q 0 .6 5 8

(

)F

y

W h ere

KL λc = rπ

F E
27

y

Compression Members
ASD
KL/r > C′c (ASD E2-2)

F

a

=

12π 2E 2 3(K L / r )
2

W h ere

C c′ =

2π 2E Q Fy

LRFD

λ c Q > 1 .5
F
cr

(LRFD A-E3-3)

 0 .8 7 7 =  2  λc

 F 

y

W h ere

KL λc = rπ

F E

y

28

Compression Members
LRFD
F
cr

 0 .8 7 7 =  2  λc

 F 

y

W h ere

KL λc = rπ

F E

y

F

cr

   0 .8 7 7 =    K L F y  rπ E 

   

2

   F    

y

F

cr

=

0 .8 7 7 π 2 E

(K L

/ r)

2

F cr =

2 2 3(K L / r )

2 0 .1 7 1 π 2 E

29

Compression Members
ASD
F
a

LRFD
)
2

=

12π 2E 2 3(K L / r

F cr =

2 3(K L / r)

2 0 .1 7 1 π 2 E
2

Fcr / Fa = 1.681 LRFD Fcr = ASD Fa × 1.681
30

Compression Members
ASD
 K yL KL / r =   r  y
W h ere  KL     r 
e

Y

K zLz  KL   , ,    r e rz 
= π E Fe
(ASD C-E2-2)

LRFD
λc = Maximum of ( λcy , λcz , λe )
31

Compression Members
LRFD
Where:

λ cy =

K yL ryπ

y

F E

y

λ cz

K zL = rzπ F F
y e

z

F E

y

λe =

32

Compression Members
Flexural-Torsional Buckling
 π 2EC Fe =  (K x L x   1 .0 + G J  Iy + I 

)

w 2

z

33

Qs Computation
ASD
W h en Q 95 /
s

F

y

/ k

c

< b / t < 195 /
y

F

y

/ k
c

c

= 1 .2 9 3 − 0 .0 0 3 0 9 ( b / t ) F
4 .0 5

/ k

kc =

LRFD
W h en
Q
s

(h

/ t)

0 .4 6

if h / t > 7 0 , o th e rw ise k

c

= 1 .0

0 .5 6

E / F

y

< b / t < 1 .0 3 E / F
y

y

= 1 .4 1 5 − 0 .7 4 ( b / t ) F

/ E

34

Qs Computation
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD
W h en 95 / F
y

/ k

c

< b / t <195 /

F

y

/ k
y

c

Q

s

= 1 .2 9 3 − 0 .0 0 3 0 9 ( b / t ) F

/ k

c

LRFD

W h en Q
s

9 5 .3 6 /

F

y

< b / t < 1 7 5 .4 /
y

F

y

= 1 .4 1 5 − 0 .0 0 4 3 4 5 ( b / t ) F

35

Qs Computation
ASD
W h en
Q
s

b / t ≥ 195 /
= 26200k
c

F
/ F

y

/ k

c
2

[

y

(b / t )

]

LRFD
W h en b / t ≥ 1 .0 3 E / F
y

Q

s

= 0 .6 9 E / F

[

y

(b / t )

2

]
36

Qs Computation
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD

W h en
Q
s

b / t ≥ 195 /
= 26200k
c

F
/ F

y

/ k

c
2

[

y

(b / t )
F

]

LRFD

W h en

b / t ≥ 1 7 5 .4 /
s

y

Q

= 20010 / F

[

y

(b / t )

2

]
37

Qa Computation
ASD
253t  4 4 .3  be = 1 −  f  (b / t) f    ≤ b

LRFD
b e = 1 .9 1 t

E f

 0 .3 4 1 −  (b / t) 

E   f 

≤

b

A ssu m e E = 2 9 0 0 0 k si ,

3 2 5 .2 6 t  5 7 .9  be = 1 −  f (b / t) f    
38

Compression Members
o -100.

Y Z X FIXED JOINT
39

Compression Members
• Member is 15 feet long • Fixed at the bottom of the column and free at the top • Loadings are: • Self weight • 100 kips compression force at the free end • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
40

Compression Members
ASD W10x49 LRFD W10x54 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944
41

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941

Compression Members
ASD W10x49 FX = 100.734 kips LRFD W10x54 FX = 160.967 kips Area = 14.4 in.2 Ratio = 0.941

Area = 15.8 in.2 Ratio = 0.944
42

Compression Members
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 160.967 / 100.734 = 1.598 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD Fcr = (1.681) × ASD Fa Estimate required cross-sectional area for LRFD 1 6 0 .9 6 7 1 .0 1 .0 0 .9 4 1 A r e a f o r L R F D = 1 4 .4 × × × × = 1 6 .0 5
1 0 0 .7 3 4 1 .6 8 1 0 .8 5 0 .9 4 4

LRFD

W10x54

Area = 15.8 inch
43

Compression Members
Code Check based on the ASD9 and use W10x54

FX = 100.806 kips

Ratio = 0.845

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 160.967 / 100.806 = 1.597
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D = 0 .8 4 5 ×
1 6 0 .9 6 7 1 .0 1 .0 × × = 0 .9 4 4 1 0 0 .8 0 6 1 . 6 8 1 0 .8 5

LRFD

W10x54

Ratio = 0.944

44

Compression Members
ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 100 kips W10x49 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 100 kips W10x54 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.944 Example # 2 Dead Load = 50 kips Live Load = 50 kips W10x49 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.921 Code check W10x49 based on the ASD9 W10x49 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.941
45

Flexural Members
• Based on the b/t and h/tw ratios determine the compactness of the cross-section • Classify flexural members as Compact, Noncompact, or Slender • When noncompact section in ASD, allowable stress Fb is computed based on the l/rt ratio. l is the laterally unbraced length of the compression flange. Also, Cb has to be computed • When noncompact or slender section in LRFD, LTB, FLB, and WLB are checked • LTB for noncompact or slender sections is computed using Lb and Cb. Lb is the laterally unbraced length of the compression flange
46

Flexural Members
ASD fb = MZ/SZ ≤ Fb LRFD Mu = MZ ≤ ϕb Mn
Where ϕb = 0.9
47

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements
ASD
b / t ≤ 65 / F
y

d / tw ≤ 640 /

F

y

LRFD

b / t ≤ 0 .3 8

E / F

y

h / t w ≤ 3 .7 6
h / t w ≤ 6 4 0 .3 /

E / F

y

Assume E = 29000 ksi

b / t ≤ 6 4 .7 /

F

y

F

y
48

Flexural Members Compact Section
ASD Fb = 0.66Fy LRFD
(LRFD A-F1-1) (ASD F1-1)

ϕb Mn = ϕb Mp = ϕb Fy ZZ ≤ 1.5Fy SZ
Where ϕb = 0.9
49

-15.00

Flexural Members Compact Section

o

FIXED JOINT Y Z X

-15.00

Braced at 1/3 Points
o FIXED JOINT

50

Flexural Members Compact Section
• Member is 12 feet long • Fixed at both ends of the member • Loadings are: • Self weight • 15 kips/ft uniform load • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Braced at the 1/3 Points • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
51

Flexural Members Compact Section
ASD W18x40 LRFD W18x40 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982
52

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959

Flexural Members Compact Section
ASD W18x40 MZ = 2165.777 inch-kips LRFD W18x40 MZ = 3462.933 inch-kips Sz = 68.4 in.3 Ratio = 0.959

Zz = 78.4 in.3 Ratio = 0.982
53

Flexural Members Compact Section
Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD = (0.66Sz)(1.5989) / (0.9Zz) × ASD Zz
f o r L R F D = 6 8 .4 ×
3 4 6 2 .9 3 3 0 .6 6 0 .9 5 9 × × = 7 8 .3 2 1 6 5 .7 7 7 0 .9 0 .9 8 2

LRFD

W18x40

Zz = 78.4 in.3
54

Flexural Members Compact Section
Code Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40

MZ = 2165.777 inch-kips

Ratio = 0.959

Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 3462.933 / 2165.777 = 1.5989
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D = 0 .9 5 9 ×
3 4 6 2 .9 3 3 0 .6 6 6 8 .4 × × = 0 .9 8 1 2 1 6 5 .7 7 7 0 .9 7 8 .4

LRFD

W18x40

Ratio = 0.982
55

Flexural Members Compact Section
ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 15 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 15 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.982 Example # 2 Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ft Live Load = 7.5 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.859 Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9 W18x40 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.959
56

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
• Based on b/t, d/tw and h/tw determine if the section is noncompact • Compute Cb • Compute Qs • Based on the l/rt ratio, compute allowable stress Fb • Laterally unbraced length of the compression flange (l) has a direct effect on the equations of the noncompact section
57

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD fb = MZ/SZ ≤ Fb LRFD Mu = MZ ≤ ϕb Mn
Where ϕb = 0.9
58

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements
ASD
65 F
y

< b t ≤ 95
F
y

F

y

d tw > 640

h tw ≤ 760

Fb

LRFD
0 .3 8 3 .7 6 E F E F
y y

< b / t ≤ 0 .8 3 E F < h t w ≤ 5 .7 E F
y

L

59

Limiting Width-Thickness Ratios for Compression Elements
Assume E = 29000 ksi

ASD

65

F

y

< b t ≤ 95
F
y

F

y

d tw > 640

h tw ≤ 760

Fb

LRFD
6 4 .7 / 6 4 0 .3 / F F
y y

< b / t ≤ 1 4 1 .3 / < h t w ≤ 9 7 0 .7 /

F F

L y
60

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
 b f F b = F y  0 .7 9 − 0 .0 0 2 2tf  
If  76b f L b > L c = m in im u m   F y  or

 Fy   
20000 A
f

(ASD F1-3)

(d

)

  Fy  

(ASD F1-2)

ASD Equations F1-6, F1-7, and F1-8 must to be checked.

61

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
When
102 × 103C Fy
b

≤

l rT

≤

510 × 103C Fy

b

2 2 F y (l / rT ) Fb =  − 3 1530 × 103C 

b

 F  

y

≤ 0 .6 F y Q

s

(ASD F1-6)

62

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
When

l rT

≥

510 × 103C Fy

b

Fb =

170 × 103C

(l

/ rT

)

b

2

≤ 0 .6 F y Q

s

(ASD F1-7)

63

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
For any value of l/rT

12 × 103C Fb = ld / A f

b

≤ 0 .6 F y Q

s

(ASD F1-8)

64

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD 1. 2. 3. LTB, Lateral-Torsional Buckling FLB, Flange Local Buckling WLB, Web Local Buckling

65

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD
– LTB
• • Compute Cb Based on the Lb, compute limiting moment capacity. Lb is the lateral unbraced length of the compression flange, λ = Lb/ry Lb has a direct effect on the LTB equations for noncompact and slender sections Compute limiting moment capacity based on the b/t ratio of the flange, λ = b/t Compute limiting moment capacity based on the h/tw ratio of the web, λ = h/tw
66

•

– –

FLB
•

WLB
•

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD LTB For λp < λ ≤ λr
M
Where: Mp = Fy Zz ≤ 1.5Fy Sz Mr = FLSz λ λp = Lb/ry =
1 .7 6 E F
yf

(Table A-F1.1)

n

 = C b M  

p

− M

(

p

− M

r

)

 λ − λp  λ − λ  r p

  ≤ M   

p

(LRFD A-F1-2)

FL = Smaller of (Fyf − Fr) or Fyw

67

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD
Where: λr

LTB

(Table A-F1.1)

X = F

1 L

1 +

1 + X 2F

L

2

π X1 = Sz
C X2 = 4 I
w y

E G JA 2
 Sz    G J 
2

68

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD
M
Where: Mp = Fy Zz ≤ 1.5Fy Sz Mr = FLSz λ = b/t λp = 0 . 3 8 E F λr =
0 .8 3 E F
y L

FLB
 = M   − M

(Table A-F1.1)

For λp < λ ≤ λr
n p

(

p

− M

r

)

 λ − λp  λ − λ  r p

    

(LRFD A-F1-3)

FL = Smaller of (Fyf − Fr) or Fyw

69

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD WLB For λp < λ ≤ λr
M
Where: Mp = Fy Zz ≤ 1.5Fy Sz Mr = Re Fy Sz Re = 1.0 for non-hybrid girder
n

(Table A-F1.1)

 = M  

p

− M

(

p

− M

r

)

 λ − λp  λ − λ  r p

    

(LRFD A-F1-3)

70

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
LRFD WLB
λ λp = h/tw = 3 .7 6 E F
y
y

(Table A-F1.1)

λr = 5 . 7 E F

71

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD
C M
b 1

= 1 .7 5 + 1 .0 5 ( M < M
m ax 2

1

M

2 ) +

0 .3 ( M
2

1

M

)2 2

≤ 2 .3

If M

b e tw e e n M

1

and M

,

C

b

= 1 .0

LRFD
C M M M
b

=
A B C

2 .5 M

m ax

1 2 .5 M m a x + 3M A + 4 M

B

+ 3M

C

= a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t q u a rte r p o in t = a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t c e n te rlin e = a b so lu te v a lu e o f m o m e n t a t th re e − q u a rte r p o in t
72

-12.00

Flexural Members Noncompact Section

o Pin

Y Z X

-12.00

o Roller

73

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
• • • • • Member is 12 feet long Pin at the start of the member Roller at the end of the member Cross-section is W12x65 Loadings are: • Self weight • 12 kips/ft uniform load • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Check code based on the ASD and LRFD codes
74

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD W12x65 Cb = 1.0 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988 LRFD W12x65 Cb = 1.136 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971 Code check is controlled by FLB. Cb = 1.0 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.973
75

Flexural Members Noncompact Section
ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 12 kips/ft W12x65 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 12 kips/ft W12x65 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.971 Example # 2 Dead Load = 6 kips/ft Live Load = 6 kips/ft W12x65 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.85 Code check W12x65 based on the ASD9 W12x65 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.988
76

Design for Shear
ASD
h / tw ≤ 380 F
y

fv = FY/Aw ≤ Fv = 0.4Fy LRFD
h / t w ≤ 2 .4 5 E / F
yw

(ASD F4-1)

Vu = FY ≤ ϕvVn = ϕv0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)

Where ϕv = 0.9
77

Design for Shear
Assume E = 29000 ksi ASD h / tw ≤ 380 F y fv = FY/Aw ≤ Fv = 0.4Fy LRFD
h / t w ≤ 4 1 7 .2 / F
yw

(ASD F4-1)

Vu = FY ≤ ϕvVn = ϕv0.6Fyw Aw

(LRFD F2-1)

Where ϕv = 0.9
78

Design for Shear
ASD
h / tw > 380 F
y

fv = FY/Ay ≤ F v =

F

y

2 .8 9

(C v ) ≤

0 .4 F

y

(ASD F4-2)

LRFD

2 .4 5 E / F

yw

< h / t w ≤ 3 .0 7
yw

E / F

yw
yw

Vu = FY ≤ ϕvVn = ϕv 0 . 6 F

 2 .4 5 E / F Aw  h / tw 

   

(LRFD F2-2)

Where ϕv = 0.9
79

Design for Shear
LRFD
3 .0 7 E / F
yw

< h / tw ≤ 260

 4 .5 2 E Vu = FY ≤ ϕvVn = ϕv A w  2  (h / t w ) 

   

(LRFD F2-3)

Where ϕv = 0.9

80

-15.00

Design for Shear

o

FIXED JOINT Y Z X

-15.00

Braced at 1/3 Points
o FIXED JOINT

81

Design for Shear
• Same as example # 3 which is used for design of flexural member with compact section • Member is 12 feet long • Fixed at both ends of the member • Loadings are: • Self weight • 15 kips/ft uniform load • Load combinations based on the ASD and LRFD codes • Steel grade is A992 • Braced at the 1/3 Points • Design based on the ASD and LRFD codes
82

Design for Shear
ASD W18x40 LRFD W18x40
(Check shear at the end of the member, equation “F4-1 Y”)

Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8
(Check shear at the end of the member, equation “A-F2-1 Y”)

Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948
83

Design for Shear
ASD W18x40 FY = 90.241 kips LRFD W18x40 FY = 144.289 kips Ay = 5.638 in.2 Ratio = 0.8

Ay = 5.638 in.2 Ratio = 0.948
84

Design for Shear
Code Check based on the ASD9, Profile W18x40 FY = 90.241 kips Ratio = 0.8 Load Factor difference between LRFD and ASD 144.289 / 90.241 = 1.5989 Equation Factor difference between LRFD and ASD LRFD = (0.4)(1.5989) /(0.6)(0.9) × ASD
L R F D R a t i o c o m p u t e d f r o m A S D = 0 .8 ×
1 4 4 .2 8 9 0 .4 1 .0 × × = 0 .9 4 8 9 0 .2 4 1 0 .6 0 .9

LRFD

W18x40

Ratio = 0.948
85

Design for Shear
ASD Example # 1 Live Load = 15 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8 LRFD Example # 1 Live Load = 15 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.948 Example # 2 Dead Load = 7.5 kips/ft Live Load = 7.5 kips/ft W18x40 Actual/Limiting Ratio = 0.83 Code check W18x40 based on the ASD9 W18x40 Actual/Allowable Ratio = 0.8
86

Combined Forces
ASD
fa /Fa > 0.15

C m y f by fa C m z f bz + + ≤ 1 .0 Fa   fa  fa  1 −  F by 1 −    F ez   F ey  

(ASD H1-1)

fa 0 .6 F

+
y

f by F by

+

f bz ≤ 1 .0 F bz

(ASD H1-2)

LRFD

Pu /ϕPn ≥ 0.2

Pu M uz 8  M uy +  + φ M φPn 9  b ny φ b M nz

  ≤ 1 .0  

(LRFD H1-1a)

87

Combined Forces
ASD
fa /Fa ≤ 0.15

f by fa f bz + + ≤ 1 .0 Fa F by F bz

(ASD H1-1)

LRFD

Pu /ϕPn < 0.2

 M uy Pu M uz  +  + 2 φP n  φ b M ny φ b M nz

  ≤ 1 .0  

(LRFD H1-1a)

88

Combined Forces

Y Z X

89

Combined Forces
• 3D Simple Frame
• • • 3 Bays in X direction 2 Bays in Z direction 2 Floors in Y direction Self weight of the Steel Self weight of the Slab Other dead loads Live load on second floor Live load on roof Wind load in the X direction Wind load in the Z direction 3 @ 15 ft 2 @ 30 ft 2 @ 15 ft

•

• • • • • • • 62.5 15.0 50.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 psf psf psf psf psf psf
90

Combined Forces ASD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH > < > < Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE > < Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members > < > < Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members > < W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 > < W12x58 1.4400E+03 2.4480E+04 6.9352E+00 4 > < W12x65 1.4400E+03 2.7504E+04 7.7919E+00 4 > < W12x72 2.1600E+03 4.5576E+04 1.2912E+01 12 > < W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 > < W8x40 1.4400E+03 1.6848E+04 4.7730E+00 4 > < W8x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH > < > < TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS > < > < LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 4.6566E+01 VOLUME = 1.6437E+05 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

91

Combined Forces LRFD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH > < > < Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE > < Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members > < > < Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members > < W10x33 3.6000E+03 3.4956E+04 9.9030E+00 16 > < W10x39 1.4400E+03 1.6560E+04 4.6914E+00 4 > < W10x49 7.2000E+02 1.0368E+04 2.9373E+00 4 > < W12x45 1.4400E+03 1.9008E+04 5.3850E+00 4 > < W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 > < W8x31 1.4400E+03 1.3147E+04 3.7246E+00 4 > < W8x40 1.4400E+03 1.6848E+04 4.7730E+00 8 > < > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH > < > < TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS > < > < LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 3.3874E+01 VOLUME = 1.1957E+05 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

92

Combined Forces
ASD
WEIGHT = 46.566 kips

LRFD
WEIGHT = 33.874 kips
93

Deflection Design ASD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH > < > < Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE > < Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members > < > < Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members > < W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 > < W12x58 1.4400E+03 2.4480E+04 6.9352E+00 4 > < W12x65 1.4400E+03 2.7504E+04 7.7919E+00 4 > < W12x72 2.1600E+03 4.5576E+04 1.2912E+01 12 > < W14x43 1.4400E+03 1.8144E+04 5.1402E+00 4 > < W14x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 > < W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH > < > < TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS > < > < LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 4.6933E+01 VOLUME = 1.6566E+05 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

94

Deflection Design LRFD
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < Active Units Weight Unit = KIP Length Unit = INCH > < > < Steel Take Off Itemize Based on the PROFILE > < Total Length, Volume, Weight, and Number of Members > < > < Profile Names Total Length Total Volume Total Weight # of Members > < W10x33 2.1600E+03 2.0974E+04 5.9418E+00 12 > < W10x49 1.4400E+03 2.0736E+04 5.8745E+00 8 > < W10x54 7.2000E+02 1.1376E+04 3.2228E+00 4 > < W12x40 1.4400E+03 1.6992E+04 4.8138E+00 4 > < W14x43 2.8800E+03 3.6288E+04 1.0280E+01 8 > < W14x48 1.4400E+03 2.0304E+04 5.7521E+00 4 > < W6x9 3.2400E+03 8.6832E+03 2.4600E+00 18 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> < ACTIVE UNITS WEIGHT KIP LENGTH INCH > < > < TOTAL LENGTH, WEIGHT AND VOLUME FOR SPECIFIED MEMBERS > < > < LENGTH = 1.3320E+04 WEIGHT = 3.8345E+01 VOLUME = 1.3535E+05 > <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

95

Deflection Design
ASD
WEIGHT = 46.933 kips

LRFD
WEIGHT = 38.345 kips
96

Compare Design without and with Deflection Design
ASD
Without Deflection Design With Deflection Design WEIGHT = 46.566 kips WEIGHT = 46.933 kips

LRFD
Without Deflection Design With Deflection Design WEIGHT = 33.874 kips WEIGHT = 38.345 kips

97

Design same example based on Cb = 1.0
Code and deflection design with Cb = 1.0 ASD
Compute Cb Specify Cb = 1.0 WEIGHT = 46.933 kips WEIGHT = 51.752 kips

LRFD
Compute Cb Specify Cb = 1.0 WEIGHT = 38.345 kips WEIGHT = 48.421 kips
98

Design Similar example based on Cb = 1.0 and LL×5
• Code and deflection design with Cb = 1.0 and increase the live load by a factor of 5. • Area loads are distributed using two way option instead of one way • Also change the 2 bays in the Z direction from 30 ft to 15 ft. ASD LRFD WEIGHT = 25.677 kips WEIGHT = 22.636 kips Difference = 3.041 kips
99

Design Similar example based on Cb = 1.0 and LL×10
• Code and deflection design with Cb = 1.0 and increase the live load by a factor of 10. • Area loads are distributed using two way option instead of one way • Also change the 2 bays in the Z direction from 30 ft to 15 ft. ASD LRFD WEIGHT = 31.022 kips WEIGHT = 29.051 kips Difference = 1.971 kips
100

Stiffness Analysis versus Nonlinear Analysis
• Stiffness Analysis – Load Combinations or Form Loads can be used. • Nonlinear Analysis – Form Loads must be used. Load Combinations are not valid. • Nonlinear Analysis – Specify type of Nonlinearity. • Nonlinear Analysis – Specify Maximum Number of Cycles. • Nonlinear Analysis – Specify Convergence Tolerance.
101

Nonlinear Analysis Commands
• NONLINEAR EFFECT
• TENSION ONLY • COMPRESSION ONLY • GEOMETRY AXIAL

• MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CYCLES • CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE • NONLINEAR ANALYSIS
102

Design using Nonlinear Analysis Input File # 1
• • • • • • • • • • • • Geometry, Material Type, Properties, Loading ‘SW’, ‘LL’, and ‘WL’ FORM LOAD ‘A’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.4 FORM LOAD ‘B’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘LL’ 1.6 FORM LOAD ‘C’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘WL’ 1.6 ‘LL’ 0.5 FORM LOAD ‘D’ FROM ‘SW’ 0.9 ‘WL’ 1.6 DEFINE PHYSICAL MEMBERS PARAMETERS MEMBER CONSTRAINTS LOAD LIST ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ \$ Activate only the FORM loads STIFFNESS ANALYSIS SAVE
103

Design using Nonlinear Analysis Input File # 2
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. RESTORE LOAD LIST ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ SELECT MEMBERS SMOOTH PHYSICAL MEMBERS DELETE LOADINGS ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ SELF WEIGHT LOADING RECOMPUTE FORM LOAD ‘A’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.4 FORM LOAD ‘B’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘LL’ 1.6 FORM LOAD ‘C’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘WL’ 1.6 ‘LL’ 0.5 FORM LOAD ‘D’ FROM ‘SW’ 0.9 ‘WL’ 1.6 LOAD LIST ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ STIFFNESS ANALYSIS CHECK MEMBERS STEEL TAKE OFF SAVE
104

Design using Nonlinear Analysis Input File # 3
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. RESTORE LOAD LIST ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ SELECT MEMBERS SMOOTH PHYSICAL MEMBERS DELETE LOADINGS ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ SELF WEIGHT LOADING RECOMPUTE FORM LOAD ‘A’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.4 FORM LOAD ‘B’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘LL’ 1.6 FORM LOAD ‘C’ FROM ‘SW’ 1.2 ‘WL’ 1.6 ‘LL’ 0.5 FORM LOAD ‘D’ FROM ‘SW’ 0.9 ‘WL’ 1.6

105

Design using Nonlinear Analysis Input File # 3 (continue)
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. NONLINEAR EFFECT GEOMETRY ALL MEMBERS MAXIMUM NUMBER OF CYCLES CONVERGENCE TOLERANCE DISPLACEMENT LOAD LIST ‘A’ ‘B’ ‘C’ ‘D’ NONLINEAR ANALYSIS CHECK MEMBERS STEEL TAKE OFF SAVE
106

General Comparison between AISC LRFD and ASD

Questions

107

```
DOCUMENT INFO
Shared By:
Categories:
Stats:
 views: 3184 posted: 6/22/2009 language: Malay pages: 107