Transpupillary Thermotherapy
Document Sample


Transpupillary
Thermotherapy for CNVM
and Choroidal
Hemangioma
Chung May Yang
NTUH
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l ClassicCNVM: well demarcated
area by fluorescein angiography
l Occult CNVM: fibrovascular RPED
or late phase leakage
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Natural History of CNVM
– 50%-55% lost at least 3 lines of VA
in one year of FU
– 45%-50% lost at least 6 lines of VA
in two years of FU
Transpupollary Thermotherapy
Treatment options for CNVM
- Laser photocoagulation
direct
feeder vessels
- photodynamic theraphy
- Surgical removal of CNVM
- Macular translocation
- Medical treatment
steroid
anti-VEGF
- Dietary supplement
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
for CNVM
History
l Reichel E. et al, 1997 (Presentation)
l Reichel E. et al, 1999 (Ophthalmology
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Low irradiance
l Large Spot size
l Long-pulsed infrared laser
l Target temperature rise: 10-15°
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Proposed mechanism
– Vascular thrombosis (Free radical,
apoptosis, heat shock protein)
– Thermal inhibition of angiogenesis
– Induction of fibrosis
Transpupillary Thermotheraphy
l Instrument
– Diode laser, 810nm
– Slit lamp
– Area centralis lens, Q lens
Transpupillary Thermotheraph
l Power setting
– Power / diameter = 247mw/mm
– Spot size 1.2, 2.0, 3.0mm, 3.85mm, 5.77mm
– Power: 800mw 3.0mm
530 2.0mm
320 1.2mm
955 3.85mm
1430 5.77mm
– Duration 1min
– Test spots ( ? )
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Power adjustment
– Pigmentation
– Pseudophakia
– Classic vs occult
– Fluid, blood
– Myopia
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Power adjustment
Extensive fluid elevation : 10% increase
Subretinal blood : 5-10% increase
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Retreatment
– Time : Occult 3 months
Classic 2 months
– Indications
No reduction of exudation
VA loss
Active CNVM
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Advantage
– Uncomplicated procedure
– No immediate scotoma
– No immediate retinal damage
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Complication
– RPE tear
– Subretinal hemorrhage
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Previousstudies (improved: same: worsened)
I: 20%, 30%
S: 65%, 40%
W: 25%, 30%
(Reichel et al, Miller-Rivero et al)
I: 0%
S: 60%
W: 40%
(Newsom et al)
Transpupillary Thermotherap
Trials
l Clinical
TTT 4 CNV
– Occult, ARMD
– >50year
– <2 D.D.
– Serous RPED <25%
– Classic component <10%
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
(TTT)
l Patients and Methods
l CNVM:
inclusion criteria
ARMD or myopic degeneration
Subfoveal NV confirmed by FA
VA < 0.5
no previous treatment
l Thorough ophthalmological examinations
and FA
Transpupillary Thermtherapy
l Patients and Methods
– Treatment Methods
l Diode laser, 810nm (Iris Medical Oculright
SLX) through slit lamp
l Test spots
l Power: 250-750mw
l End point: no visible lesions
l Single surgern
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Results
- ARMD 28 myopia 2
- classic 10, occult 17, mixed 3
- size 1 ¡Ø1DD
10 > 1DD~4DD
19 > 4DD
- age: 36~86 (69.6)
- Fu: 1~24M’(8.72)
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
I S W
ARMD 10 7 11
Myopia 1 1 0
Total 11 8 11
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
I S W
Classic 4 3 3
Occult 5 5 7
Mixed 2 1
Transpupillary Thermotherapy
l Conclusion
– Limited experiences suggest beneficial
– Both classic and occult respond to the
treatment
– Unpredictable outcome
l Future direction
– Combined with ICG
ase Age R/L Pre-VA F’d Post-VA Fu(M’) Result Commen
No. change
1 68 R 0.05 O=C, 1DD 0.01 15M W Size ↑
2 62 R 0.05 O, 1/5DD 0.05-0.1 4.5M I
3 63 R 0.05 O, 1.5DD ND 14M I→ W Recurren
4 71 L ND O,6-7DD 0.03 16M I Scar
5 76 R ND O, 1.5DD ND 3M S
6 74 R 0.04 O,1.5DD 0.04 2M S
7 68 L 0.04 O,2DD 0.05-0.1 3M I Scar + E
8 64 L ND C, 1DD ND 2M S Scar
9 69 L ND C, 4.5DD 0.03 9M’ W Scar=RD
10 76 R 0.02 O, 5-6DD 0.01 4M’ S Scar+Acti
11 74 R 0.3 O, 1DD 0.15 14M’ W Size ↑
12 86 L ND C, 4DD 0.01 3M’ W Size ↑
13 73 R 0.05 C,1DD 0.03 12M’ S Size ↓
14 65 L 0.05 O,0.5DD 0.1 5M I Scar
15 69 R 0.025 3DD 0.05 15M I Scar
ase Age R/L Pre-VA F’d Post-VA Fu(M’) Result Commen
No. change
16 65 R 0.03 C, 1/4DD 0.1 10M I Scar
17 70 L 0.1 O, 3DD 0.05 5M’ W Size ↑
18 70 R 0.2 O, 2DD 0.05 18M’ W
19 66 L ND C, 2DD ND 16M’ I
20 75 L 0.05 O=C,2DD 0.5 16M’ I
21 36 R 0.1 C, 2/3DD 0.1 14M’ S
22 65 L ND C, 1DD 0.1 8M’ I
23 78 L 0.1 O, 1DD 0.1 5M’ S
24 83 L 0.09 C, 1.5DD 0.05 3M’ W
25 65 L 0.4 O,4.5DD 0.01 24M’ W
26 59 L ND C, 1/5DD 0.01 11M’ I
27 66 R 0.05 O,>4DD 0.1 2M’ I
28 83 R ND O, 1DD ND 1M’ S
29 80 L 0.2 O, 2DD 0.05 4M’ W
30 70 R 0.1 O, 1DD 0.05 3M’ W
Circumscribed Choroidal
Hemangioma
Benign, middle-aged, posteriorly
located
Vision affected by:
1. Exudative macular RD
2. CME
3. Direct macular involvement
4. Nerve compression (?)
Management of Choroidal
Hemangioma
Observation
Photocoagulation
Plaque radiotherapy
External beam radiotherapy
Enucleation for NVG
Circumscribed Choroidal
Hemangioma
Photocoagulation and light therapy
Xenon-arc
Argon
ICG-assisted diode
Transpupillary thermotherapy
Photodynamic
Laser for Choroidal
Hemangioma
Reaccumulation of SRF in 40%
Multiple sessions required
Tumor shrinkage unlikely
Macular tumor not applicable
TTT for Intraocular Tumors
Tumor heating using light in the
infrared range
Modified diode laser delivery
system
TTT for Intraocular Tumors
Used for small to medium sized
melanoma
Combined with radiotherapy or laser
(Shield, CL and JA, 1998)
TTT for Choroidal Tumors
Histopathological changes after TTT on
melanoma
- Tumor necrosis up to 3.5mm in depth
- Sharp margin
- No scleral damage
(Journee-de Korver JG, et al 1997)
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
First report — Othmane IS, shields CL an
JA, et al 1999
Largest series — Garcia-Arumi J, et al
(2000, 8 cases)
decrease of tumor size with
disappearance of SRF
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
echniques
Gray to white color change of the
retina near the end of the treatmen
Timing of retreatment: no consensus
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
Treatment complications
Retinal vascular occlusion
Intraretinal hemorrhage
(localized perivascular)
Transient increase of SRF
(Robertson DM, et al 1999)
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
Advantage
May induce tumor shrinkage:
minimize recurrent SRF
May treat macular lesions
TTT for Choroidal
hemangionma
Patients and Methods
From Feb. 2000 to Sep. 2000
Six consecutive patients
Inclusion criteria:
- VA decrease secondary to CH
- Macular or jurtapapillary CH
- Follow-up period: more than 3 months
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
Ophthalmological evaluation
Clinical examination— VA, ocular fundu
Fluorescein angiography
Ultrasonography
Measurement of tumor size (D.D)
TTT for Choroidal Hemangioma
Treatment methods
Diode laser
Spot size: 3mm
Duration: 60 sec
Power: 400mw-1200mw
End point: subthreshold for macular lesions
Grade? to ? burn for juxtapapillary
lesions
Retreat if tumor size no change after 2-3 months
TTT for Choroidal Hemangioma
Results
3M, 3F
34-60 years
3 macular, 3 juxtapapillary
Tumor size: 2.5D.D to 6D.D
Pre-tx VA HM/50cm to 0.4
TTT for choroidal
Hemangioma
Results
VA improved: 3
VA stable: 1
VA decreased: 2
Tumor size reduced: 4
ase age sex R/L Tumor location Tumor size Macula
No change
1 56 M R Macular area 6 D.D Tumor, S
2 60 M L Juxtapapill 4 D.D RPE
change
folds
3 52 F R Macular area 4.5 D.D Tumor, S
4 34 M R Macular area 2.5 D.D CME, SR
Tumor
5 34 M R Juxtapapill 3.5 D.D SRF
6 60 F L Juxtapapill 3.5 D.D SRF
ase
Pre-tx VA Post-tx VA Tx FU
No
1 0.04 0.05 TTT Ï? 8.5 M
2 0.01 0.2 ? 0.05 (?) TTT Ï ? 9.5 M
3 HM/50cm ND/10cm TTT Ï ? 10 M
4 0.15 0.05 TTT Ï ? 5.5 M
5 0.4 0.7 TTT Ï ? 3 M’
6 0.05 0.01 TTT Ï ? 5.5 M
TTT for Choroidal
Hemangioma
Summary
Initial limited experience
suggests usefulness
No immediate decrease of vision
after treating macular area
TTT for Choroidal Hemangioma
Summary
Transient SRF increase after
suprathreshold treatment
Tumor flattening down gradually
Get documents about "