Document Sample

Snap Rounding Shai Hirsch November, 2001 Robustness and Precision in Geometric Computing Introduction A rounding scheme for dynamic segment intersection with finite precision output Key terms: – Segment intersection – Rounding scheme (finite precision output) – Dynamization Intuition Input Output References Greene & Yao, 1986 Hobby, 1997 Guibas & Marimont, 1995 Outline Introduction Concepts Into Finite Precision Algorithms Conclusion Outline Introduction Concepts Into Finite Precision Algorithms Conclusion Concepts Sweep-line algorithm Trapezoidal Decomposition Minkowski Sums Sweep-line Sweep line a2 b1 b ab b2 a a1 Event Points Status a1 b1 ab b2 a2 a b a a b1 b2 b2 a2 a b b2 a2 a2 a2 Trapezoidal Decomposition Vertical Attachments Bounding Box Trapezoidal Decomposition (cont.) TDs can be built – Via sweep-line (statically). – Segment by segment (incrementally, randomized) TDs can be dynamic (segments can get removed) TDs can serve as point location search structures Point Location via TD a1 C b1 E H a2 b L C ab D F ab K I a a2 b2 a b1 G a L a1 G J H D b b2 E F b K I J Minkowski Sums For sets P, Q, the Minkowski Sum is the set of all sums p+q, where p P, q Q P Q = { p+q | p P, q Q} Minkowski Sums (cont.) = Minkowski Sums (cot’d) Outline Introduction Concepts Into Finite Precision Algorithms Conclusion Into Finite Precision What’s wrong? A naïve solution Rounding Scheme Criteria Snap Rounding Topological Analysis What’s wrong? Inifinite-precision model assumed (Real RAM) Effects of finite-precision ignored What’s wrong? (cont.) Finite precision causes Rounding errors which gives rise to Topological Inconsistencies Naïve Solution Run ordinary intersection alg. Round intersections to nearest grid point Problems: – Spurious Intersections – Multiple Iterations – Displaced Intersections – Drifting lines – Topological Inversion Spurious Intersections (13,6) Original (9,5) Input (0,0) (5.45, 2.52) (-1,-2) Spurious Intersections (cont.) Rounding to (13,6) integers (9,5) (5, 3) (0,0) Extraneous (-1,-2) Intersections Multiple Iterations (13,6) (9,5) (5, 3) (0,0) Extraneous intersections? Then iterate algorithm (-1,-2) Displaced Intersections No bound over distance of displacement Drifting Lines a b1 b2 b3 Topological Inversion Rounding Scheme Criteria 1. Perturbed segments should be near the originals 2. Preserve topology as much as possible 3. Output should be managable using finite precision Snap Rounding Avoid problems in naïve solution - Treat points as Obstacles [Greene, Yao, 1986] Snap Rounding The Setting: Tile plane with unit squares - pixels Center unit squares on the points of the integer grid For a rounded arrangement all vertices are perturbed to integral points Snap Rounding Terminology ursegments – original unrounded segments polysegments – the resulting polygonal lines after perturbation fragments – line segments making up a polysegment Snap Rounding Hot Pixels – pixels containing: – Ursegment endpoints – Ursegments intersection points Snap Rounding Perturb ursegments ,terminating in a hot pixel, to terminate at pixel’s center. Perturb ursegments that pass through a hot pixel, to pass through its center. Potential Snap Rounding mistake ?! Input Output Integers Grid Hot Pixels Rounding Topological Analysis Lemma 1 Polysegment s’ corresponding to ursegment s is contained within the Minkowski Sum of s with a pixel (centered at the origin). Topological Analysis There is an explicit continuous deformation D, which takes an arrangement A to its rounded form. During D, features of A may collapse, but they never invert (non penetration condition). Topological Analysis Theorem 1 After snap rounding a. No fragments intersect except at their endpoints Topological Analysis b. Circular ordering of fragments ending at the same pixel match order of ursegment. Topological Analysis c. If r intersects s and then t, then r’ cannot intersect t’ before s’. Topological Analysis d. If a vertical line l through pixel centers intersects s and then t, then l cannot intersect t’ before s’. Outline Introduction Concepts Into Finite Precision Algorithms Conclusion Algorithms 1. Static sweep-line algorithm 2. Dynamic trapezoidal decomposition algorithm sweep-line algorithm Use sweep-line algorithm to find the intersection points (“Pass 1”). (T - the set of endpoints and intersection points.) Compute T , the hot pixel centers. Sweep again: bend original segments to pass through T (“Pass 2”). sweep-line algorithm How do we find intersection of segment s with hot pixel in Pass 2 ? 1st solution: Add boundary segments for each hot pixel and sweep again. Problem: Overhead of around 400% sweep-line algorithm Better solution: – User information from Pass 1; We already know all intersection points. – Use special properties of hot pixels Vertical edges need no explicit representation Horizontal edge come in batches that start and end together. sweep-line algorithm – Batch i – contains all hot pixels that begin at x = i – ½ and end at i + ½. – Hot pixel edges are kept in a separate list, the hot edge list. (The status is still maintained.) i-½ i i+½ sweep-line algorithm – Some status segments start or end at i. – Hot edges start on x = i – ½ and end at i + ½. – No segments start on i – ½ < x < i or on i < x < i + ½. The corresponding vertical slabs are called hammocks. i-½ i i+½ sweep-line algorithm Pass 2 processes batches one-at-a- time. It resynchronizes the status and hot edge list when the sweep line reaches the end of a hammock. Each such step is O(Ni log Ni + k`i) – Ni – # of events (start/end/cross). – k`i – # of vertices inserted by SR. sweep-line algorithm The algorithm still runs in time O((n+k) log n) Trapezoidal Decomposition The overall TD scheme is the same, but we need to maintain the SR. An ursegment is stored with the fragments that make up its polysegment. A fragment has a sorted list of ursegments it represents. TD: Inserting Ursegments Requires 3 searches: – Find new hot pixels created by s (endpoints, intersections) – Find existing hot pixels through which s passes – Find existing ursegments that pass through new hot pixels. TD: Deletions To delete ursegment s – Visit the fragments of its polysegment s` – Remove s from their list – When a list becomes empty, delete fragment. – Delete each vertex of s` in a hot pixel that got cold (previously hot only because of s). SR Examples: Triangulation SR Examples: Triangulation (Detail) SR Examples: Congestion SR Examples: Congestion (Detail) Outline Introduction Concepts Into Finite Precision Algorithms Conclusion Conclusion We saw: – A test case which exemplifies robustness and precision problems (segment intersection) – A way to handle such problems via controlled changes (snap rounding) Conclusion (cont.) We discussed: – Problems in the naïve solution – A set of criteria for a good rounding scheme – A set of properties of SR which maintain the objectives and the criteria Conclusion (cont.) Implementations presented: – Sweep line: Static – Trapezoidal Decomposition: Incremental Dynamic -הסוף-

DOCUMENT INFO

Shared By:

Categories:

Tags:
line segments, Computational geometry, hot pixels, hot pixel, the Snap, Dan Halperin, Eli Packer, the Rook, intersection points, Tel Aviv University

Stats:

views: | 13 |

posted: | 3/29/2011 |

language: | English |

pages: | 59 |

OTHER DOCS BY nikeborome

How are you planning on using Docstoc?
BUSINESS
PERSONAL

By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy and
terms of service, and to receive content and offer notifications.

Docstoc is the premier online destination to start and grow small businesses. It hosts the best quality and widest selection of professional documents (over 20 million) and resources including expert videos, articles and productivity tools to make every small business better.

Search or Browse for any specific document or resource you need for your business. Or explore our curated resources for Starting a Business, Growing a Business or for Professional Development.

Feel free to Contact Us with any questions you might have.