Docstoc

Building Common Assessments Everett Public Schools

Document Sample
Building Common Assessments Everett Public Schools Powered By Docstoc
					Building Common
 Assessments in
     Mathematics
Everett Public Schools
                       Mary Ann Stine
     Director, Curriculum & Instruction
                          Judi Caudle
           Elementary Math Facilitator
                           Rita Husby
        Middle School Math Facilitator
                         Jana Wilson
        Middle School Math Facilitator
History of Math in Everett
   Everett adopted CMP in 2002.
   Prior to that it was the ―Julie Andrews‖ approach.
   In 2002, 29% of students met/exceeded standard on
    the WASL at 7th grade.
   In 2006 – 2007, 57.5% of students met/exceeded
    standard on the WASL in 7th grade.
   There was on-going CMP training and professional
    development.
   Expectation and accountability to use CMP
    supported through a pacing calendar.
The Need For Aligning
Instruction & Assessment
   Frustrated with the assessment results
   Hard to measure the learning
   Lots of great mathematics, hard to know what
    to focus on
   Needed to begin at the end and identify the
    mathematical big ideas as well as the
    necessary skills
Building the Teams
   Grade-Level teams with representatives from
    each middle school and the middle school
    math facilitators
   Teams were released 6 days throughout the
    year
   Set the stage for the work
   Goal was to work on the unit they were
    currently teaching, or about to teach
   Reality was we revisited a lot of our work
Our Process
   Mathematics—Big Ideas and Skills
   Marriage of CMP, GLEs, Test and Item Specs
   Learning Targets
   Aligning Assessment Items to Learning Targets
     Match to Learning Targets
     Item Accuracy
     Freedom from Bias
   Field Test Assessments
   Reflection Sheet for Students
   Next Steps
     Develop Rubrics
     Common Scoring of Assessments
     Select Anchor Papers
Example: Shapes & Designs
   Identified Big Mathematical Ideas

   Aligned Learning Targets to the GLEs

   Used Test & Item Specs as a Guide
                                Shapes & Designs Learning Targets




Processes:
•     I use geometric properties to sort, label, and classify polygons.
    1- Below Standard   2-Approaches Standard   3-Meets Standard   4-Exceeds Standard

•       I solve problems using geometric properties.
    1- Below Standard   2-Approaches Standard   3-Meets Standard   4-Exceeds Standard



Skills:
•       Reasonably estimate angle measures and accurately measure angles with tools.
           Reasonably Estimate
           Need More Study               Almost There                  Got It!

            Accurately Measure
            Need More Study                     Almost There                  Got It!

•       Determine the angle sum of any regular polygon.
           Need More Study                Almost There                        Got It!
Sample Assessment Items
1) a. List the characteristics of a regular polygon                       Make a
                                                        Side Side Side   Triangle?
     below.                                                              Yes or No
                                                         A    B    C
3) Determine whether or not the following side length    2    2    2
     combinations make a triangle. Explain how you
     know:


                                                         7    10   3
6)   Name each triangle according to its sides and
     angles.
        a.           b.                c.
                                                        10    11   12

                                                        13    12   5
How Did I Do?
   Processes: I use        Test   Got It!           Missed it    Evaluati
                           Items                                    on
    geometric properties                     Calc.        Needs    Score

    to sort, label, and                      Error        More
                                                          Study

    classify polygons.     1a

                            3

                           6a

                           6b

                           6c
Practical Experience—Write
Learning Targets
   Data About Us
       Determine Learning Targets using Big Ideas of
        CMP, Test and Item Specs
       Separate into Process and Skills
Practical Experience—
Matching Test Items
   Matching Test Items
     Match the Learning Targets
           Does the item measure the important aspects of the target?
           Is the level of difficulty appropriate?
       Accuracy
           Is the content of the item accurate?
           Is the terminology appropriate?
           Are all parts of the item clear in their meaning?
           If there is a graphic, is it accurate and relevant to the item?
           If multiple choice, do the distractors represent plausible alternatives?
       Freedom from Bias
           Does the context or scenario exclude certain groups based on the
            content, lack of prior experience, etc.
Lessons Learned
   Uncovered the mathematics
   Addressed blind spots
   Accessed new content & process learning
   Opportunity to question current practices
   Continued collaboration
Q&A
   Contact Information
     Mary Ann Stine
      mstine@everettsd.org
     Judi Caudle
      jcaudle@everettsd.org
     Rita Husby
      rhusby@everettsd.org
     Jana Wilson
      jwilson2@everettsd.org
     Variables & Patterns documents will be on our website for two
      weeks.
      http://www.everett.k12.wa.us/math
      Click on Teachers-Secondary, Middle School, CMP Resources,
      Variables & Patterns