Docstoc

EUROPA European Commission Homepage

Document Sample
EUROPA European Commission Homepage Powered By Docstoc
					    To be completed by the Project Manager for every service contract and attached to the final report on the contract

                            CONTRACTOR ASSESSMENT FORM
                          FOR EU-FUNDED SERVICE CONTRACTS
                                                          <Contract title> <Location>
                                                           <Contract reference code>


1    CONTRACTOR
                                 Name(s) of firm(s)
 Leader*
 Partner 2*
 Etc … *

* add / delete additional lines for partners as appropriate. Note that a sub-contractor is not considered
  to be a partner for the purposes of this assessment form. If this assessment is being completed for
  an individual contractor, the name of the contractor should be entered as 'Leader' (and all other lines
  should be deleted).

2    PERFORMANCE PERIOD OF CONTRACT

 From            < Date >                                          To                       < Date >

3    PERFORMANCE RATING OF CONTRACTOR

 Factor                                                            Rating                   Comments (if rating is not 3)
                                                                                                                                                                    Rating scheme
 Achievement of contract objectives (as                                                                                                                             1   Excellent
 specified in the Terms of Reference)                                                                                                                               2   Good
                                                                                                                                                                    3   Average
 Ability to meet deadlines                                                                                                                                          4   Below average
                                                                                                                                                                    5   Unsatisfactory
 Quality of service

4    PERFORMANCE RATING OF KEY EXPERTS
                                                                                                            Job management
                                                            communication

                                                                            communication
                                       Client relations




                                                                                            determination




                                                                                                                             effectiveness


                                                                                                                                             competence
                                                                                                                                              Technical
                                                                                                                               Personal
                                                                                               Drive &
                                                               Written




                                                                                                                                                          Overall
                                                                               Verbal




                                                                                                                                                                        Rating scheme
                                                                                                                                                                    1    Excellent
               Name                                                                                                                                                 2    Good
                                                                                                                                                                    3    Average
                                                                                                                                                                    4    Below average
                                                                                                                                                                    5    Unsatisfactory




November 2010                                                                                                                                                       Page 1 of 2
671ae019-f66f-403d-9eec-c38f66231977.doc
5    PROJECT MANAGER

Name

Signature

Date




2008                                       Page 2 of 2
671ae019-f66f-403d-9eec-c38f66231977.doc