chapter3
Shared by: VinyWenkz
-
Stats
- views:
- 48
- posted:
- 3/18/2011
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 5
Document Sample


3.1 A Logical View of Data Characteristics of a Relational Table
Unlike the hierarchical and network data
models, the relational data model allows 1. A table is perceived as a two-
the designer to focus on the logical dimensional structure composed of
representation of the data and its rows and columns.
relationships, rather than the physical
2. Each table (tuple) represents a single
storage details.
entity occurrence within the entity
Relational database model enables us to
set.
view data logically rather than physically
by using tables. 3. Each table column represents an
Relational data models has the attribute, and each column has a
disadvantages of structural and data distinct name.
independence; and much easier to
4. Each row/column intersection
understand than the hierarchical and
represents a single data value.
network models.
Relational data models has greater logical 5. All values in a column must conform
simplicity which tends to yield a more to the same data format. For example,
efficient database. if the attribute is assigned an integer
3.1.1 Tables & their Characteristics data format, all values in the column
Table – a logical construct that has been representing that attribute must be
the basis for the creation of data integers.
relationships which facilitates the logical
6. Each column has a specific range of
view of relational database
values known as the attribute domain.
- perceived as a two-dimensional
structure composed of rows & columns 7. The order of the rows and columns is
TABLE immaterial to the DBMS.
- contains a group of related entities/
entity set 8. Each table must have an attribute or a
- also called relation because the combination of attributes that
relation’s model creator E. F. Codd used uniquely identifies each row.
the term relation as a synonym for table Sample Data Types
- a persistent relation ( a relation whose Data Characteristic
contents can be permanently saved for Type
future use)
In MSAccess, relation is called dataset Numeric Are on which you can perform
which is based on the mathematical meaningful arithmetic procedures
theory derived from E. F. Codd’s model.
Character Also known as string data or text
Some database users incorrectly assume
data, can contain any character
that relation refers to relationships
symbol not intended for
Many incorrectly conclude that only
mathematical manipulation.
relational model permits the use of
relationships. Date Date attributes contain calendar
dates stored in a special format
Viny :D Page 1
known as the Julian date format An attribute whose values match
which supports Julian date primary key values in the related
arithmetic. table
Referential integrity
Logical Can have only a true or false (yes or FK contains a value that refers to
no) condition. an existing valid tuple (row) in
Domain – column’s range of permissible another relation
values Secondary key
Primary key (PK) – an attribute (or a Key used strictly for data retrieval
combination of attributes) that uniquely purposes
identifies any given row.
SUMMARY Null Values
Tables are the basic building blocks of a No data entry
relational database. Not permitted in primary key
A grouping of related entities, known as Should be avoided in other attributes
an entity set is stored in a table. Can represent
The relational table is composed of An unknown attribute value
intersecting rows (tuples) and columns. A known, but missing, attribute
Each row represents a single-entity. value
Keys A “not applicable” condition
Consists of one or more attributes that Can create problems in logic and using
determine other attributes formulas
Primary key (PK) is an attribute (or a Controlled RedundancyMakes the
combination of attributes) that uniquely relational database work
identifies any given entity (row) Tables within the database share common
Key’s role is based on determination attributes that enable us to link tables
If you know the value of attribute together
A, you can look up (determine) Multiple occurrences of values in a table
the value of attribute B are not redundant when they are required
This extends to the notion of a to make the relationship work
mathematical “function” f(x). Redundancy is unnecessary duplication of
Composite key data
Composed of more than one
attribute Types of Participation
Key attribute Mandatory
Any attribute that is part of a key Table A’s participation is
Superkey mandatory if you must enter at
Any key that uniquely identifies least one record in Table A before
each entity you can enter values in Table B
Candidate key Optional
A superkey without redundancies Table A’s participation is optional
Foreign key (FK) if you are not required enter at
Viny :D Page 2
least one record in Table A before Intersect:
you can enter values in Table B Yields only the rows that appear
Degree of Participation in both tables
Is the minimum and maximum number of Difference
records (entity instances) a Table must Yields all rows in one table not
have associated with a single record in the found in the other table—that is,
related Table. it subtracts one table from the
Usually expressed as a pair of numbers other
Min,Max example 1,10. Divide
Integrity Divide one table by the attributes
Table Level Integrity = Entity Integrity of another
Relationship Level Integrity = Referential Seldom used
Integrity Select
Field Level Integrity = Domain Integrity Yields values for all rows found in
Ensures that every field is sound. a table
The values are valid, consistent, Can be used to list either all row
and accurate values or it can yield only those
Relational Algebra row values that match a specified
Codd’s contribution included the idea that criterion
you could describe an “Algebra”, a Yields a horizontal subset of a
consistent mathematical description of a table
DBMS. Project
This is huge because if it is Yields all values for selected
‘mathematically consistent’ then when attributes
you perform an operation you know that Yields a vertical subset of a table
it must return the results you expect. Join
Relational Database Operators Allows us to combine information
Relational algebra from two or more tables
Defines theoretical way of Real power behind the relational
manipulating table contents using database, allowing the use of
relational operators: independent tables linked by
SELECT common attributes
PROJECT Natural JoinLinks tables by selecting only
JOIN rows with common values in their
INTERSECT common attribute(s)
Use of relational algebra Result of a three-stage process:
operators on existing tables 1. PRODUCT of the tables is created
(relations) produces new relations 2. SELECT is performed on Step 1
Union: output to yield only the rows for
Combines all rows from two which the AGENT_CODE values
tables, excluding duplicate rows are equal
Tables must have the same Common column(s) are
attribute characteristics called join column(s)
Viny :D Page 3
3. PROJECT is performed on Step 2 In outer join for tables CUSTOMER and
results to yield a single copy of AGENT, two scenarios are possible:
each attribute, thereby Left outer join
eliminating duplicate columns Yields all rows in
Final outcome yields table that CUSTOMER table,
1. Does not include unmatched pairs including those that do
2. Provides only copies of matches not have a matching value
If no match is made between the table in the AGENT table
rows, Right outer join
1. the new table does not include Yields all rows in AGENT
the unmatched row table, including those that
The column on which we made the JOIN— do not have matching
that is, AGENT_CODE—occurs only once in values in the CUSTOMER
the new table table
If the same AGENT_CODE were to occur The Data Dictionary
several times in the AGENT table, and System Catalog
1. a customer would be listed for Data dictionary
each match Used to provide detailed
This is IT accounting of all tables found
This is what makes the relational database within the user/designer-created
work in practical terms. database
You can use values from different but Contains (at least) all the attribute
related tables work together to get the names and characteristics for
results you need. each table in the system
Other Forms of Join Contains metadata—data about
Equijoin data
Links tables on the basis of an Sometimes described as “the
equality condition that compares database designer’s database”
specified columns of each table because it records the design
Outcome does not eliminate decisions about tables and their
duplicate columns structures
Condition or criterion to join System catalog
tables must be explicitly defined Contains metadata
Takes its name from the equality Detailed system data dictionary
comparison operator (=) used in that describes all objects within
the condition the database
Theta join Terms “system catalog” and “data
If any other comparison operator dictionary” are often used
is used interchangeably
Outer Join Can be queried just like any
Matched pairs are retained and any user/designer-created table
unmatched values in other table are left Relationships within the
null Relational Database
Viny :D Page 4
1:M relationship Crucial to exercising data
Relational modeling ideal redundancy control
Should be the norm in any Sometimes, data redundancy is necessary
relational database design Summary
M:N relationships Primary key uniquely identifies attributes
Must be avoided because they Can link tables by using controlled
lead to data redundancies redundancy
1:1 relationship Relational databases classified according
Should be rare in any relational to degree to which they support relational
database design algebra functions
The 1:1 Relationship Relationships between entities are
Found in any database environment represented by entity relationship models
One entity can be related to only one Data retrieval speed can be increased
other entity, and vice versa dramatically by using indexes
Often means that entity components were
not defined properly
Could indicate that two entities actually
belong in the same table
Sometimes 1:1 relationships are
appropriate
The M:N Relationship
Can be implemented by breaking it up to
produce a set of 1:M relationships
Can avoid problems inherent to M:N
relationship by creating a composite
entity called a bridge or linking entity
Linking Table
Implementation of a composite entity
Yields required M:N to 1:M conversion
Composite entity table must contain at
least the primary keys of original tables
Linking table contains multiple
occurrences of the foreign key values
Additional attributes may be assigned as
needed
Data Redundancy Revisited
Data redundancy leads to data anomalies
Such anomalies can destroy
database effectiveness
Foreign keys
Control data redundancies by
using common attributes shared
by tables
Viny :D Page 5
Get documents about "