Presentation for NEO Clinicians on the Stroke Rehabilitation
Shared by: nikeborome
-
Stats
- views:
- 5
- posted:
- 3/17/2011
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 48
Document Sample


Consensus Panel on the
Stroke Rehabilitation System
“Time is Function”
Jenn Fearn, Regional Rehabilitation Coordinator
Darren Jermyn, Regional Program Manager
Northeastern Ontario Stroke Network
December 11, 2007
Take Home Points
• What is the Final Report of the Stroke
Rehabilitation System Consensus Panel, 2007?
• What are some of the key highlights of the report?
• Where/Who can I go to for further information on
Outcome Measures and Stroke Rehabilitation
Information?
• What is the North Eastern Ontario Rehabilitation
Network (NEORN)?
Impact and Cost of Stroke
• Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability
with high health care and human costs
($2.7 billion annual cost to Canadian economy)
• In Ontario – 24,000 patients present yearly to
hospitals with signs and symptoms of stroke and
there are at least 90,000 Ontarians living with the
effects of stroke
• In 2005-06 there were 1124 hospital admissions
for stroke or stroke related diagnosis in the North
East LHIN (CIHI-NACRS data – SEAC Report 2006)
Recent Advancements in Stroke
Rehabilitation Initiatives
• The release of HSFO’s Best Practice Guidelines for Stroke Care
(transition management, rehabilitation management and
community re-engagement) (2003)
• Evidence-Based Review of Stroke Rehabilitation (EBSRB)
Dr. R. Teasell – London, ON (2003 to present)
• Recommendations from the 6 stroke rehabilitation pilot projects
(2004)
• Documentation of new evidence on the efficacy and cost-
effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation (ongoing)
• The approval and funding of the Community and LTC Specialist
(2004) and the Rehabilitation Coordinator (2005) positions
across the stroke regions
• Canadian Stroke Strategy – Best Practice Recommendations
(2006)
Specifically, the Panel was formed to:
• Describe and define the components of the
Stroke Rehabilitation System in Ontario
• Identify components of a Service Provision
Model (triage system)
• Develop stroke rehabilitation Standards
• Select the common assessment tools
• Take initial steps in the development of a
province-wide data system for stroke
rehabilitation
• Make Recommendations to move the stroke
rehabilitation agenda forward
Vision for Stroke Rehabilitation
in Ontario
• Individuals who experience a stroke will
have timely access to the appropriate
intensity and duration of rehabilitation
services.
• These services will be provided in a
comprehensive and coordinated way to
patients and families, by agencies and
health care providers who are expert in
stroke care and practice rehabilitation
principles.
Definition of „Rehab Ready‟
The Panel defined 5 criteria for determining
whether a stroke survivor is ready to begin
rehabilitation outside the acute care setting,
they are:
1. Readiness for D/C from acute care,
2. Medical stability,
3. Ability to learn,
4. Ability to participate, and
5. Consent.
Categories of the Severity of Stroke
Severity of the Stroke
Severe Moderate Mild
Early FIMTM Score*
Total FIMTM < 40 40 - 80 > 80
Motor Function < 38 38 - 62 > 62
*(5 to 7 days post stroke)
Service Provision Model
Service Provision Model
• A Rehab “Triage Tool”
that applies across the
entire care continuum
• A starting algorithm that
provides the foundation
for a standardized
approach for regional
triage systems across
each stroke region in the
province
• It is expected that each
stroke region will adapt
the model and develop
more detail in the process
as appropriate
Moderate Stroke
Moderate Stroke
Screen/Assess The stroke survivor requires an acute admission and is deemed Rehab Ready.
Define Based on the outcome of the assessment, the rehab professional determines
that the stroke survivor meets the criteria for inpatient rehab.
Refer/Transfer The rehab professional then refers the stroke survivor to a stroke rehab unit.
Screen/Assess The stroke survivor is reassessed at the end of the formal rehab program, and
it is determined that the stroke survivor would benefit from additional rehab.
Define Based on the outcome of the assessment, the rehab professional determines
that the stroke survivor meets the criteria for home-based stroke rehab
services.
Refer/Transfer The stroke survivor is discharged home and referred to home-based services
for rehab and other support services.
Screen/Assess At the end of the home-based rehab program, the stroke survivor is
reassessed and no further rehab needs are identified.
Screen/Assess The stroke survivor is reassessed periodically, but no further rehab needs are
identified.
Standards
Standards for Stroke Rehabilitation
Overarching Principles
1. Stroke survivors will have timely, equitable and
consistent access to coordinated rehabilitation
services.
2. Rehabilitation at all points along the care
continuum will be evidence based where
evidence is available and be provided by
appropriate rehabilitation professionals and
other health care providers with expertise in
stroke rehabilitation.
3. An interprofessional model of care will be used
when assessing and treating all stroke
survivors.
Classifying the Standards
4 Main Areas
– Education
– Best Practice Stroke Care
– System Navigation
– Regional System of Care
}
}
Clinicians
Management/
System Level
Specific Standards of Interest to
NEO Clinicians
Standards - Education
Standard #5:
Stroke related impairments and functional
status will be evaluated by rehabilitation
professionals trained in stroke rehabilitation
using standardized, valid assessments.
Recent Project to Achieve Standard:
Two workshops were offered in Sudbury on
October 27 & 28, 2007 for occupational therapists
and physiotherapists on the following
recommended assessments:
• Chedoke-McMaster Stroke Assessment
• Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory
National Expert Consensus
Panel for Outcome
Measurements Post-Stroke
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
Conference
Held February 6-7, 2006
Goals: Through discussion with Canadian Stroke
Network and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of
Ontario, it was agreed that an expert
consensus panel with representatives from
relevant health professionals as well as
stakeholders would be an important method for
establishing a course of rehabilitation
outcome measures to be used across the
continuum.
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
Conference Chairs
Dr. Mark Bayley, Dr. Patrice Lindsay
Membership
Dr. Nicol Korner-Bitensky,
Dr. Robert Teasell,
Dr. Johanne Desrosiers,
Dr. Jeff Jutai,
Alison MacDonald,
Katherine Salter,
Dr. Sharon Wood-Dauphinee,
Nancy Deming.
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
Objectives
1. Using the International Classification of
Functioning to prioritize a set of outcome
measures in the domains of body structure
and function, activity and participation that
could be used to evaluate the outcome of
stroke rehabilitation in Canada.
2. Identify preliminary indicators of performance
of the stroke rehabilitation system.
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
Criteria Suggested to Facilitate Selection:
• The measure should have been used in
previous stroke trials as identified by the Stroke
Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review.
• The measure can be used at admission and
completion of rehabilitation.
• The measure can be administered in a
multidisciplinary fashion – i.e., could be
administered by a number of different health
professionals.
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
• The measure should have optimal psychometric
properties including reasonable reliability and
demonstrated validity.
• The measure should be available in English and
French.
• The time required to complete the measure should fit
within the context of the usual assessment time of a
health care professional (i.e., is not excessively
burdensome).
All Measures Selected Also Considered:
• Ease and feasibility of administration; Content of the
measure; Reliability, Validity and Responsiveness.
Appendix M: Outcome Measures
Canadian Best Practices in Stroke
Rehabilitation Outcomes
The Domains
• Measures of Stroke • Cognition
Severity • Arm Function
• Medical Co-morbidities • Walking/Lower Extremity
• Upper Extremity • Balance
Structure and Function • Functional Communication
• Lower Extremity • Self-Care Activities of Daily
• Spasticity Living
• Visual Perception • Instrumental Activities of
• Language Daily Living
• Speech Intelligibility • Participation
Tool
Outcome Measures Resource List
Standards - Education
Standard #12a:
The interprofessional team will have access to
stroke rehabilitation education and professional
development modules in order to support the
standards and other evidence-based practice
initiatives.
These educational opportunities will be evidence-
based, current and user-friendly and will
incorporate knowledge translation strategies.
Resources:
Stroke Rehabilitation Resource Guide available at:
http://profed.heartandstroke.ca/
(Ontario Stroke System - Stroke - Professional
Resources - Stroke Rehabilitation Resource Guide)
Stroke Rehabilitation Resource Guide
• Ambulation/Mobility • Pain
• Aphasia & Other • Pediatric Stroke
Communication
Impairments • Pusher Syndrome
• Assessment & Outcome • Recreation
Measures
• Rehabilitation
• Cognitive, Perceptual &
Behavioural Problems • Sexuality
• Community • Survivor & Caregiver
Re-engagement Support & Education
• Continence
• Transition Management
• Depression & Mood
• Upper Extremity
• Driving
• Dysphagia and Nutrition • Web Resources
Standards - Education
Standard #12b:
Stroke survivors, family/caregivers and
volunteers should be provided with information
and education at all stages of care across the
continuum (prevention, acute care, rehabilitation,
community reintegration).
It should address: the nature of stroke and its
manifestations, signs and symptoms, impairments
and their impact and management, risk factors,
planning and decision making, resources and
community support.
Possible Projects or Initiatives:
Inpatient and family education programs, Living with
Stroke, Moving on After Stroke (MOST), Stroke
Survivor Canada
Standards - Education
Standard #6:
The interprofessional team will develop a
comprehensive rehabilitation plan with each stroke
survivor that reflects the severity of the stroke, the
needs and goals of the stroke survivor, and the
family/caregiver and home environment.
Possible Projects or Initiatives:
Explore the feasibility of the potential use of the
NEO Video Stroke Network to assist small hospitals
with treatment advice/options or to discuss
complicated cases.
Standards – Best Practice Stroke Care
Standard #11:
Therapy will include repetitive and intense use of
novel tasks that challenge the stroke survivor to
acquire necessary skills during functional tasks
and activities.
The interprofessional team, along with the
family/caregiver and volunteers, will promote the
practice of skills gained in therapy into the stroke
survivor’s daily routine and will reinforce increased
stroke survivor participation and activity.
Possible Projects or Initiatives:
Workshops, Inservices, Rounds with respect to
‘novel tasks’
Standards – Best Practice Stroke Care
Standard #16:
Stroke survivors who are discharged to the
community with home-based stroke rehabilitation
services will be provided with these services as
per available evidence-based guidelines.
Current Projects or Initiatives:
• Stats are being collected from all 6 branches of
the NE CCAC including West Parry Sound. The
data is being compared to the Community and
Stroke Best Practice Guidelines (2005)
• In future, target CCAC case managers with
further education.
Standards – System Navigation
Standard #17:
Interprofessional teams will facilitate linkages for
stroke survivors and their family/caregivers after
discharge to services in the community.
Current Projects or Initiatives:
Stroke Community Resource Guides
Developed in each district outlining stroke and/or
stroke related services available in the community
(e.g. CCAC contact info, Driving Eval. info, Rehab Services, etc.)
Collaborative Workshops offered across NEO
Involve the partnership between the Psychogeriatric Resource
Consultants, the Regional Best Practice Coordinator for LTC and
the NEO Stroke Network Community and Long-Term Care
Specialist. These workshops provide an opportunity to network,
learn more about community resources and how to combine
various initiatives to address the needs of clients.
Selected Management/System Level
Standards the NEO Clinician
Should Be Aware Of
Selected Management/System Level
Standards
Standard #13:
All stroke survivors, regardless of where they live,
will have equitable access to the same standard of
care at the appropriate intensity and duration.
Standard #19:
Each stroke region will have an explicit stroke
rehabilitation service provision model in place in
order to facilitate optimal and timely access to
rehabilitation services.
Standard #20:
Clinical and service utilization data will be used to
plan, coordinate, integrate and prioritize regional
stroke rehabilitation services and ensure equitable
access based on patient need.
Evaluation of the Standards
As the stroke rehabilitation community begins
to implement the standards proposed in this
report, health care providers, administrators
and funders will need to:
• Understand how well the system (or region) is
performing against the established standards.
• Analyze what has changed for stroke survivors,
in both qualitative and quantitative terms, once
the standards have been implemented.
• Determine whether stroke survivors were able
to access the recommended services, which
services were accessed, and what barriers to
access still exist within and across regions and
LHINs.
Recommended Next Steps To Move
The Rehabilitation Agenda Forward
Adopt the Standards
• (3 Recommendations)
Create Needed Capacity to Deliver Stroke Rehab
• (2 Recommendations)
Develop Regional Systems
• (3 Recommendations)
Take Action to Relieve the Human Resource Shortage
• (1 Recommendation)
Facilitate Evaluation and Research
• (2 Recommendations)
Development of Regional Systems
Recommended Next Steps
That each Stroke Region work in conjunction with its
respective Local Health Integration Network in:
• Developing and implementing a plan based on the
Panel’s standards in order to meet the service needs
of stroke survivors in their area (Recommendation 6)
• Developing a process for referral to the appropriate
services and tracking where and when the
appropriate service does not occur (Recommendation 7)
• Developing stroke rehabilitation service capacity to
meet the Panel’s standards and in facilitating
interorganizational agreements that support having
the right person in the right place at the right time
(Recommendation 8)
North Eastern Ontario
Rehabilitation Network
Established: November 2006
NE LTC
Homes, Link with other
Community & established
NE Networks – i.e.
Mental Health NE
Hospitals Dementia, ABI, &
Agencies Community
with Rehab other Regional
Hospitals
Beds Rehab Networks)
North Eastern
Ontario
North East Ontario Telemedicine
CCAC
Rehabilitation Network
Network
Regional
Networks: Academic
Stroke, ABI Institutions
North East
LHIN
Proposed
Current
Future
Members
Members
Work Accomplished to Date
Information sharing
• Admission criteria for designated rehabilitation
beds
• Utilization data related to admission and D/C
data
• Compiling resource inventory (e.g. inpatient,
outpatient, day-hospital services and FTE’s
associated with these services)
• Sharing educational information
Developed Terms of Reference
• Draft Vision, Purpose, Objectives, Accountability
and Responsibility, etc.
Meeting with the NE LHIN
Oct 1, 2007, 3 members of the NEO Stroke
Network met with the NE LHIN senior
management team
• Case was made for more rehabilitation beds
• Proposed the concept of a regional
rehabilitation database (electronic tracking
record)
• NEO Rehabilitation Network was explained
and we asked for the NE LHIN’s
endorsement of the NEORN workplan
North Eastern Ontario Rehabilitation Network
Workplan
• Create an established link with the NE LHIN – to develop capability to
advise on rehabilitation practice, policy and funding
• Establish linkages/communication between acute care, inpatient
rehab beds, and community-based rehabilitation providers in NEO
• Common referral form for rehabilitation across all NEO Rehab Beds –
this will lead to the use of a common language and common assessment
information
• Develop transparent guidelines for rehabilitation referral process (that
address geography and patients with special needs) and repatriation
agreements between organizations
• Use of telemedicine for consultation/assessment and educational
opportunities
• Development and sustainability of a NE Rehabilitation Resource
Directory
• Improved dissemination of rehabilitation best practices through a
coordinated regional rehabilitation education system/function
Some Useful Links
StrokEngine
http://www.medicine.mcgill.ca/Strokengine/
Evidence-Based Review Of Stroke Rehabilitation
(EBRSR)
http://www.ebrsr.com/
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
(HSFO) (Prof. Ed. Section under revision at present)
http://profed.heartandstroke.ca/
Northeastern Ontario Stroke Network Website
www.neostrokestrategy.com
NEO Regional Stroke Best Practice
Consultant Team & Discussion Forum
www.neostrokestrategy.com
Contact Info
Jenn Fearn
Regional Rehabilitation Coordinator
jfearn@hrsrh.on.ca
Darren Jermyn
Regional Program Manager
djermyn@hrsrh.on.ca
www.neostrokestrategy.com
Get documents about "