Document Sample

CHAPTER 17 RISK AND DIVERSIFICATION STUDENT LEARNING 0BJECTIVES After reading Chapter 17, students should be able to answer the following questions: 1. What is risk aversion, and why are investors, as a group, risk averse? 2. What are the general investment implications of risk aversion? 3. Why is standard deviation a good measure of risk, and how does an investor compute standard deviations for both individual securities and portfolios? 4. What is the impact of security correlations impact portfolio risk? 5. What are the benefits of diversification, and how investors achieve them? 6. What is the meaning of efficient diversification and modern portfolio theory/ SUGGESTIONS FOR USE AND TEACHING TIPS The material in Chapter 17 is conceptual and somewhat difficult for students who are intimidated with math. Chapter 17 develops the concept of risk aversion and the mathematics of portfolio theory. This chapter is the foundation of modern portfolio theory (MPT) and Chapters 18, 19, 20, and 21 build on the concepts presented in this chapter. Needless to say, this chapter is very important and we suggest one or two full class periods be devoted to the chapter concepts and problems. If time permits, we suggest discussing the concepts and reconfirming the knowledge by having students work on a select problems from the End-of-chapter discussion problems or critical thinking exercises. We found that many students learn from working out a problem or discussion question rather than just listening to a lecture on a difficult concept. The question of how much to cover on risk aversion seems to evoke some controversy. Regardless of your philosophy, it is important to stress the concept of risk aversion early on in the development of MPT. Given that they are convinced that most investors are risk averse, we can establish how investors will make investment decisions and then develop the beginnings of MPT. Knowing that most investors are risk averse allows us to make preference choices for them; they prefer higher returns and lower risk. This lends itself to the definition of mean-variance dominance. 17-1 Next, the mathematics to measure return and risk is introduced. The statistical terms may be review for most students; however, if time permits a quick review may be helpful. Of course, given time constraints, an assignment to calculate return and risk (from the Discussion questions or Critical thinking exercises) would be just as effective. The essence of portfolio theory is also covered in Chapter 17. Most students accept the idea of diversification and this chapter explains why it works. The text chooses to emphasize the essentials without going into mathematical derivations. However, we feel it may help promote understanding of diversification if examples are used. We suggest that you take a problem such as 26 or 27 from the End-of-chapter exercises and generate the investment opportunity set. Assign each row a different X% invested in the first stock and (1-X)% invested in the second stock. Have each row calculate the portfolio ERp and SDp. Display the results as they provide the answers to the assignment. Graph it and show how the investment opportunity set is generated with their numbers. Also if they see that the calculation isn’t so difficult, they are less intimidated by the formulas. Foremost in this chapter, students should feel comfortable with the concept of diversification because it leads to the definition of two types of risk: market risk and diversifiable risk. These concepts are important as it links portfolio theory to CAPM in Chapter 18. 17-2 LECTURE OUTLINE I. What is risk aversion? A. Risk aversion. B. Risk aversion and expected returns C. Relative risk aversion and expected returns. II. Measuring Risk and Return: Individual Securities A. Measuring returns. 1. Ex-ante or expected returns. 2. Ex-post or historical returns. B. Measuring risk. 1. Range 2. Number of negative outcomes 3. Standard deviation (or variance) C. Calculating standard deviations. 1. Ex-ante or expected risk. 2. Ex-post or historical risk. D. Security selection 1. Mean-variance dominance or mean-variance efficient 2. Coefficient of variation (CV) III. Portfolio risk and return 17-3 A. Portfolio return. 1. Ex-ante portfolio return, ERp 2. Ex-post portfolio return, Mp. B. Standard deviation of a two-security portfolio. 1. Covariance (COV(A,B)) 2. Correlation coefficient CORR(A,B) 3. CORR(A,B) = COV(A,B)/ (SD A)(SD B) 4. Standard deviation for a two-security portfolio. C. Correlation and portfolio standard deviation. D. Investment opportunity set for two-security portfolio. 1. Minimum variance portfolio E. Standard Deviation of an N-Security Portfolio. IV. Diversification. A. Diversification across securities B. Two types of portfolio risk C. Mathematical effects of diversification D. Diversification across time E. Efficient diversification F. How to find an efficient frontier V. Implications for Investors 17-4 INVESTMENT PROFILE BOX – Harry Markowitz The Investment Profile in Chapter 17 is a short look at the father of Modern Portfolio Theory, Harry markowitz. It’s just historical look at one of the important founders of Portfolio Theory. INVESTMENT INSIGHT BOX – Should Companies Diversify? The Investment Insight Box in Chapter 17 discusses whether companies should apply the theory of diversification and acquire other companies in different line of business. While the extension sounds reasonable the article shows that investors can diversify by investing in various firms without the corporation acquiring other firms, especially because acquisitions require paying a premium for the target firm in order to gain corporate control. Questions you might want to ask the students are: Johnson & Johnson successfully acquired various businesses; can you think of other firms that fit this category? What did firms that could not successfully diversify do? What happened to their stock prices when they divested? PepsiCo is one example where they divested Frito-Olay, Taco Bell, Kentucky Fry Chicken, etc. ANSWERS TO END OF CHAPTER EXERCISES Mini Cases Mini- Case 1 Please refer to Instructor data disk for answers. The instructor could take this opportunity to motivate students to use a spreadsheet such as EXCEL. The commands in EXCEL are: 17-5 =AVERAGE(first cell:last cell) to calculate mean return. =STDEV(first cell:last cell) to calculate standard deviation. Mini- Case 2 Please refer to Instructor data disk for answers. This case is an excellent out of class assignment to motive students to use spreadsheets and to apply theoretical concepts from Chapter 17 (particularly, risk aversion, portfolio theory and the investment opportunity set). Review Exercises 1. A risk neutral investor’s utility function increases at a constant rate and will gain the same amount of utility as wealth increases while a risk averse investor’s utility increases at a decreasing rate. For example, as wealth level increases from 10 to 20, a risk averse investor’s utility increases by 30% but a wealth level increase from 20 to 30 increases the utility by only 13%. The risk neutral investor’s utility function would increase by 30% for both wealth level increases. 2. Risk aversion implies that the long-term relationship between risk and return should be positive. 3. The expected return from investing in eBay stock is: Expected return = .40(100%) + .60(0%) = 40% Since a 40% return on eBay investment is (much) greater than investing in T-bill (4%), even risk averse investors may prefer eBay investment to T-bills. 4. HPR(TOYS) = (36.625-21.75)/21.75 = 0.6839 HPR(TOOT) = -0.0779 HPR(HP) = 0.152 5. HPR(Boe) = 0.199 HPR(Tex) = 0.273 HPR(IBM) = 0.474 6. HPR(STAR) = 0.526 HPR(Duke) = 0.079 HPR(Dis) = -0.016 17-6 7. The actual holding period return represents a historical return while an expected return represents a future return using predicted stock price for a future period. The formulas also show the differences: Actual return = (P t – Pt-1 + DIVt)/Pt-1 Expected return = (P t+1 – Pt + DIVt+1 )/Pt 8. a. Actual return = ($65 - $58 + $1.50)/$58 = 14.66% b. Expected return = ($72 - $65 + $2.00)/ $65 = 13.85% 9. a. Actual return = .202 b. Expected return = .167 10. Following the procedure outlined in the text: a. ER (Bud) = 14.5%; ER(Toy) = 22% b. SD (Bud) = 5.7%; SD (Toy) = 9.5% c. Portfolio return = 18.25% d. Correlation coefficient = -0.0054/(.057)(.095) = -0.997 e. Portfolio SD = 1.95% 11. a. ER(JNJ) = 7.9% ER(Dis) = 33.7% b. SD(JNJ) = 4.89% SD(Dis) = 10.68% c. ERp = (.50)(7.9%) + (.50)(33.7%) = 20.8% d. CORR = -.9991 or –1.0 e. SDp = [.0005978 + .0028569 - .0012938]1/2 = 4.63% 12. a. M(Pep) = 33.30% M(HP) = 50.92% b. Using both equations the portfolio mean = 42.11%. Using Equation 12.6b, ERp = (.50)(33.30%) + (.50)(50.92%) = 42.11%. c. CORR(Pep, HP) = .55 d. Both equations should give SDp= 19.48% 2 2 2 2 1/2 SDp = [(.5) (.1373) + (.5) (.2972) + 2(.5)(.5)(.1373)(.2972)(.835)] = 0.1948 13. ERp = (.20)(33.30%) + (.80)(50.92%) = 42.30% SDp = [(.20)2(.1373)2 + (.8)2(.2972)2 + 2(.20)(.80)(.1373)(.2972)(.835)]1/2 = 0.253 14. a. M(Toys) = -3.375% M(Toot) = 10.16% b. Both equations should give you Mp = .0746. c. CORR(Toys, Toot) = 0.61 17-7 d. Both equations should give you SDp = .1523 15. Mp = 8.81% SDp = 16.67% 16. a. M(IBM) = 13.44% M(Tex) = 13.61% b. Both equations should give 13.52%. c. CORR(IBM,Tex) = .079 d. Both equations should give SD = 11.59%. 17. Mp = 13.56% portfolio standard deviation = 11.78% 18. ERp = 19%; SDp = 14.94% 19. XA = .6966 or rounded to 70% a. ERp = 14.5% b. SDp = 13.57% 20. The results are summarized below. Portfolio ERp SDp CV (P1) 40% in A-60% in B .19 .1494 .789 (P2) 70% in A-30% in B .145 .1357 .936 Even though P2 has the minimum risk, comparing the coefficient of variation, it has greater risk per return making P1 more attractive. However, it would depend on the individual risk preference as to the choice between P1 and P2 if the investor does not have the option to invest in the riskfree asset. 21. ERp = 27% SDp = 24.2% 22. The minimum variance portfoli consists of 64% in stock J and 36% in Stock K. .This portfolio expected return, ERp = 23.6% and portfolio standard deviation of 18.3%. 23. The 30-70% portfolio (prob 22) has a greater return, but also greater risk, so it would depend on the investor’s risk preference as to the choice between the two combinations. 17-8 24. The minimun variance portfolio has 74% invested in Stock A and 26% in Stock E.. It has a portfolio expected return of 14.1% and a standard deviation of 5.2%. 25. Recall the following data: Stock ER SD A .12 .06 E .20 .10 XA = 0.16/.0256 = .625 and X E = (1 – XA) = (1 - .625) = .375 ERp = 15% and SDp = 0.03% 26. a. Estimated minimum variance portfolio has 70% in Stock X and 30% in Stock Y. b. The actual proportions calculated using Equation 12.12 are 67.7% in Stock X and 32.3% in Stock Y. 27. X in L 1-X ERp SDp 1.0 0.0 .13 .1500 0.9 0.1 .138 .1409 0.8 0.2 .146 .1367 0.7 0.3 .154 .1379 0.6 0.4 .162 .1442 0.5 0.5 .170 .1551 0.4 0.6 .178 .1697 0.3 0.7 .186 .1871 0.2 0.8 .194 .2066 0.1 0.9 .202 .2277 0.0 1.0 .210 .2500 a. The minimum variance proportion is approximately 80% in Stock L and 20% in Stock M. b. Using Equation 12.12, the minimum variance proportion is 77% in Stock L and 23% in Stock M. 28. The correlation coefficient is the only variable in the SDp formula that can be negative and thereby reduce the overall portfolio risk. 17-9 29. a. Based on portfolio theory, the stock combination with the lower correlation will provide the greatest potential to diversify. X and Z have more diversification potential than X and Y because the correlation between X and Z (-.35) is lower than the correlation between X and Z (+.35). b. Using the two-asset portfolio worksheet in the I-Wizard workbook, you should be able to generate the investment opportunity set between X and Z, and X and Y. The numbers should equal the ones in the table below. c. You should observe that no combinations of X and Y dominate any combinations of X and Z – in other words combinations of X and Y never have a higher return and/or lower standard deviation than combinations of X and Z. (part of problem 29) % (1-X) ER(XY) SD(XY) ER(XZ) SD(XZ) invested in Stock X 1.0 0.0 .050 .0800 .050 .0800 0.9 0.1 .057 .0785 .057 .0682 0.8 0.2 .064 .0796 .064 .0604 0.7 0.3 .071 .0832 .071 .0583 0.6 0.4 .078 .0890 .078 .0624 0.5 0.5 .085 .0966 .085 .0716 0.4 0.6 .092 .1055 .092 .0843 0.3 0.7 .099 .1156 .099 .0992 0.2 0.8 .106 .1265 .106 .1154 0.1 0.9 .113 .1380 .113 .1324 0.0 1.0 .120 .1500 .120 .1500 30. Relevant data are shown in the table below. Graphs can be easily costructed from these data. Portfolio Standard Deviation XA invested in Portfolio A and B A and C A and D Stock A Return 1.0 10% 5.00% 5.00% 5.00% 0.9 11 5.50 5.07 3.63 17-10 0.8 12 6.00 5.29 2.37 0.7 13 6.50 5.63 1.53 0.6 14 7.00 6.08 1.84 0.5 15 7.50 6.61 2.96 0.4 16 8.00 7.21 4.29 0.3 17 8.50 7.86 5.69 0.2 18 9.00 8.54 7.11 0.1 19 9.50 9.26 8.55 0.0 20 10.00 10.00 10.00 Portfolio AD offers the greatest diversification benefits due to the lowest (negative) correlation coefficient. Given that all the portfolio combinations, AB, AC, and AD have the same ERp, the one with the lowest correlation offers the best risk/return opportunity. 31. Using the Two-Security Portfolio worksheet in the I-Wizard workbook, you can graph the investment opportunity sets for each portfolio JK and JL. The graph will show that at approximately 90% in J & 10% in K and at 80% in J & 20% in L, the ER(JK)=ER(JL) and SD(JK)=SD(JL) (.1228 vs .1259). Beyond that JL curves in and is dominated by JK at every other investment points. So JK dominates JL entirely and there are no points where JL dominates JK. 32. Market risk is the systematic risk that is inherent in the market “system” and is the security’s risk contribution to the market portfolio. Market risk is also called systematic risk or nondiversifiable risk. Firm-specific risk is risk that can be diversified because it is risk related to the company only. Firm- specific risk is also called diversifiable risk or nonsystematic risk. 33. Disagree because the correlation coefficient is the important variable to consider when combining securities into portfolios. Rather than just examining ER and SD, the correlation coerricient determines the degree of diversification benefit when securities are combined. For example, both portfolios, AB and AC, have ERp equal to 17.5%, but the SDp for AC equals 0.47 while SDp for AB is much greater (.122). Since the ERp is the same and AC has a lower risk than AB for an equally weighted portfolio, AC is preferred by risk averse investors. 17-11 34. Disagree. Even if D has a lower SD risk, its correlation with F is higher that the correlation between F and E. So it’s most likely that the portfolio risk is lower for EF combinations than for DF combinations. We show that the portfolio return equals .1920 for both portfolios DF and FE, and as expected the portfolio risk is lower for EF (.18) compared to DF (.22). Critical Thinking Exercises 1. Please refer to Instructor and Student data disk for answers. This exercise is a good opportunity for students to create equations to perform the returns and in part d, the portfolio ER and SD. If the results are somewhat different for part d, it could be due to rounding. 2. This problem is very much like mini-case 2 where the student must calculate the stock mean return and standard deviation. By creating ten portfolios with the two stocks, the student will create the investment opportunity set for the two stocks. Have them graph it on the same return-standard deviation graph from part b. Discuss how they chose the two stocks and whether it made a difference to diversify with the two stocks as compared to the ten individual stocks graphed in part b. This exercise may bring out the trade-off between efficient (high return-low SD) individual stocks and correlation between stocks. It’s possible that two stocks may have very high returns and low SDs (risk), but very highly correlated. So combining the two, may not be portfolio efficient. However, a stock with low return and high risk may be a bad choice individually; however, if its correlation with another stock is low, it may be portfolio efficient. You should encourage your students to use the Two-Asset Portfolio worksheet in the I-Wizard workbook. It will relieve them of some of the more tedious calculations. If you wish to go even further, ask students to find “optimal” portfolios –those portfolios with the highest return, for a given level of risk, or the lowest risk for a given return. The Optimal Portfolio worksheet in the I-Wizard workbook will find the optimal portfolio for up to a five stock portfolio combination. EXTRA PROBLEMS 1. Today is year t, last year was t-1, and next year will be t+1. The prices and disbursed cash dividends for a stock for these years are listed below. 17-12 Year Price Dividends t-1 $50 $1.25 t $55 $1.50 t+1 $67 $1.75 a. Calculate the actual holding period return. b. Calculate the expected return. c. Discuss the difference between the two. ANS: a. HPR = 0.13 b. ER = 0.25 c. Difference is that HPR is past earned return and ER is an expected or exante return. 2. Today is year t, last year was t-1, and next year will be t+1. The prices and disbursed cash dividends for a stock for these years are listed below. Year Price Dividends t-1 $100 $2.25 t $115 $2.50 t+1 $130 $2.75 a. Calculate the actual holding period return. b. Calculate the expected return. c. Discuss the difference between the two. ANS: a. HPR = 0.175 b. ER = 0.154 c. Difference is that HPR is past or expost return and ER is an expected or exante return. 3. The following probabilities are given for each state of the economy and the respective stock returns: Returns State of Economy Probability Cisco Systems Merck Good 60% +75% +30% Normal 30% +10% +35% Poor 10% -20% +40% a. What is the expected return for each state of the economy for each stock? b. Which stock do you think will have greater risk? Explain. c. What is the standard deviation for each stock? 17-13 d. Do you think these two stocks move in the same or opposite direction? Explain. Now calculate the correlation coefficient. e. What is the portfolio expected return from investing 50 percent in each stock? f. What is the portfolio standard deviation for an equally weighted portfolio of the two stocks? ANS: a. Cisco ER = 46% Merck ER = 32.5% b. Cisco is riskier because of the spread between returns is greater. c. Cisco SD = 36.5% Merck ER = 3.35% d. The two stocks seem to move somewhat in the opposite direction though not exactly. CORR = -.012 e. 50% in each stock results a portfolio ERp = 39.25% f. 50% in each stock results in a portfolio SDp = 18.3% 4. Five years of returns are given for Stocks C and D. Year Stock C Stock D 1991 +40% -15% 1992 +30 - 5 1993 +20 0 1994 +10 +10 1995 -10 +20 a. What is the actual mean return and standdard deviation for each stock? b. Suppose you invested 80 percent in Stock C and 20 percent in Stock D. Calculate the mean return for the portfolio using Equation 12.3 and again using equation 12.6b. c. Calculate the correlation coefficient between Stocks C and D. d. If you invested 80 percent in Stock C and 20 percent in Stock D, calculate the portfolio standard deviation using Equation 12.5 and again using Equation 12.11b. e. Suppose you decided to invest only 30 percent in Stock C and 70 percent in D. Using the data from problem 2, what are the mean portfolio return and the standard deviation. ANS: Stock C: Mc = .18 SDc = .192 Stock D: Md = -.07 SDd = .273 b. Mp = .13 for both equations. c. CORR = -.748 d. SDp = .119 for both equations. 17-14 e. Mp = .005 and SDp = .153 5. What is the minimum variance portfolio for problem 4? What are its mean portfolio return and standard deviation? ANS: Minimum variance portfolio for CD is approximately 68% in C and 32% in D. Mp = (.68)(.18) + (.32)(-.07) = .10 SDp = .087 with 68% in Stock C and 32% in Stock D. 17-15 17-16

DOCUMENT INFO

Shared By:

Categories:

Tags:
how to, Marketing Communication, Next Generation, Heidi Schultz, Don Schultz, Five Steps, Using Marketing, the Next, integrated marketing communications, Don E. Schultz

Stats:

views: | 28 |

posted: | 3/10/2011 |

language: | English |

pages: | 16 |

Description:
Measuring Returns Using Historical Stock Prices document sample

OTHER DOCS BY ihj12475

How are you planning on using Docstoc?
BUSINESS
PERSONAL

By registering with docstoc.com you agree to our
privacy policy and
terms of service, and to receive content and offer notifications.

Docstoc is the premier online destination to start and grow small businesses. It hosts the best quality and widest selection of professional documents (over 20 million) and resources including expert videos, articles and productivity tools to make every small business better.

Search or Browse for any specific document or resource you need for your business. Or explore our curated resources for Starting a Business, Growing a Business or for Professional Development.

Feel free to Contact Us with any questions you might have.