Get documents about "It Performance Assessment
Description
It Performance Assessment document sample
Document Sample
Consultant Performance Evaluation Tool
* Please fill in all green-shaded fields. Comments are optional.
PE CE
Consultant Name: Project phase at time of assessment:
WOC # and Contract #: Project Name:
Date of Evaluation: Key Number:
Evaluation Prepared By:
1) Quality / Technical Performance Comments:
Score:
Met work product standards 0
Performed and documented quality control according
to approved plan. 0
0 0
2) Cost Performance Score:
Comments:
Finished within WOC budget. 0
Invoiced ODOT accurately and timely, according to
contract 0
0 0
3) Schedule Performance Comments:
Score:
Submitted accurate and timely deliverables. 0
Met milestone due dates. 0
0 0
4) Business Relations Performance Comments:
Score:
Responded to customer needs. 0
Conducted business in a professional manner. 0
Provided effective verbal and written communication. 0
Grand Total Points: 0 0 3 2 1 0
Calculated Evaluation Score: 0% 0 PE CE
Authorized Consultant Representative: Printed Name: Date:
Signature confirms only that the ODOT Work Order Contract Manager has discussed and provided a copy of the Consultant Performance Assessment to the
authorized consultant representative and does not indicate agreement or disagreement with the content of this material. Consultant comments, if any, should be
attached to the final assessment and returned to ODOT Technical Services.
ODOT Work Order Contract Manager: Printed Name: Date:
Signature confirms that the ODOT Work Order Contract Manager has discussed and given a copy of the Consultant Performance Assessment to the authorized
consultant representative.
Notes / Additional Comments (Attach additional pages if needed):
Please send completed evaluation form and any attachments to:
ODOT Procurement Office, ATTN: Cheri Corder
Room 217 Transportation Building, 355 Capitol St. NE, OR 97301-3871
email: Cheryl.D.Corder@odot.state.or.us / phone: (503) 986-3473 / fax: (503) 986-6592
Definitions and Scoring Information
Performance Ranking: PT Value:
Exceeds Expectations 3
Meets Expectations 2
Needs Improvement 1
Does Not Meet Expectations 0
Definition of Quality and Technical Performance:
Followed applicable policies, procedures and standards. Work required minimal
correction, and provided clear, complete and concise documentation.
Constitutes 40% of total score.
Definition of Cost Performance:
Was on budget. Required minimal correction. Exercised prudent judgment.
Constitutes 10% of total score.
Definition of Schedule Performance:
No significant schedule changes within consultant control. Was on time, early or
late. Constitutes 20% of total score.
Definition of Business Relations:
Responded to questions/requests timely and adequately. Approached issues
proactively and maintained continuity in staff assignments. Approached issues
collaboratively and represented agency positively to others. Coordinated with
ODOT staff effectively, submitted timely progress reports and kept ODOT
apprised of issues early on. Provided clear, concise information. Communicated
timely with ODOT and project stakeholders. Constitutes 30% of total score.
Computations:
# of
Questions in Weighted
Category category Total Points Weight Points Action
Quality / Tech Performance 2 6 40% 24 X .4
Cost Performance 2 6 10% 6 X .1
Schedule Performance 2 6 20% 12 X .2
Business Relations 3 9 30% 18 X .2
PDU - 03/09. 81b2f923-d62a-4553-bc41-13348d28fef7.xls
Other docs by dor10899
ORDER FULFILLMENT OR SALES DISTRIBUTION 1 SAP125 SAP Navigation 2005 e learning 2 SM001 Introduction to SAP Solution Manager e learning 3 TERP01 S
Views: 174 | Downloads: 0
CJUS 3330 Introduction to Criminalistics Syllabus Edward E Hueske B S M A Office 289L Chilton Hall
Views: 93 | Downloads: 0
