Art Collectors Are NOT Artists by hkksew3563rd

VIEWS: 6 PAGES: 2

									Even in the world of Music, musical instruments, guitars and guitar players, there are
those who are 鈥淎 rtists 鈥? who through Music are trying to communicate their
creativity, and then there are 鈥淎 rt Collectors 鈥?who are people who call
themselves a 鈥済 uitarist 鈥?or an 鈥渁 rtist 鈥?but who buy and collect guitars
essentially as ornaments in their own 鈥減 rivate museum.鈥?
  鈥淎 rt collectors 鈥?are not 鈥淎 rtists.鈥?
  The number of guitars a guitarist owns is not a sign of whether they are an artist or
and art collector.
  It is how they perceive their instruments and what they do with them that separates
these two.
  Artists try to create a 鈥渨 ow factor 鈥?in their audience by playing their
instrument. It is what they play, or how they play it, and the message in their music
that wins the audience over. That achievement is one of the satisfactions of being an
artist.
  Art collectors try to create a 鈥渨 ow factor 鈥?in their audience by what objects
they have on display in their collection, much the same way as how we perceive a
museum or zoo.
  When artists try out a new guitar they play it, listen to it, feel it, compare it 鈥檚
capabilities with what they are trying to do with their music, and determine whether it
matches their creative needs, or not. If it does not, they try something else until they
find the instrument that 鈥渄 oes it for them.鈥?With the instrument of their choice
they feel better equipped to create and be the artist that they truly are.
  When Art Collectors try out a new guitar the first thing they do is inspect it, not for
playability and sound, but for it 鈥檚 appearance, it 鈥檚 physical attributes, and
how 鈥渘 ice 鈥?it looks. They check for flaws, marks or blemishes and pour over
specs lists and wonder such things as 鈥渨 here is the wood from?鈥?or make
comments like 鈥渋 t has a bit of a dent in the wood on the headstock.鈥?Whether it
plays or sounds any good is secondary to the 鈥渨 ow factor 鈥?of it 鈥檚
appearance.
  The artist is not so worried about their image as much as they are about their music.
Their instruments are their creative outlet.
  The art collector is worried about 鈥渋 mage 鈥?more than their music. They treat
the instrument as an artefact rather than as the tool for their creativity. They go crazy
if they get a little mark or scratch on their guitar. The go to gigs or to the studio with
more fear of 鈥渄 amaging 鈥?their guitar than to do the job. They criticize new
guitars for their finishes or appearance rather than their electronics or sound.
  Professional guitarists usually have many guitars. And they play them. Each guitar
has it 鈥檚 use. Different guitars are required for different songs, styles of music, gigs,
environments, and recording requirements. One guitar is not enough to satisfy the
professional guitarist 鈥檚 requirements or demands. A large collection of guitars is
necessary for the professional musician.
  The artist 鈥檚 collections of guitars get used.
  The artist 鈥檚 collections of guitars get knocked around, bumped, chipped,
dropped, exposed to the elements, dirtied, broken, repaired, etc, Guitars go through
frets, tuners, pickups, pots and jacks, when they are used for what they are meant for.
  The art collector 鈥檚 guitars don 鈥檛 get used.
  The art collector 鈥檚 guitars never get properly broken in, never get the required
setups or care required, and deteriorate naturally through the passage of Time. They
are merely ornaments. They are not being used for what they were made for and they
get wrecked from disuse.
  鈥淎 rt Collectors 鈥?are not 鈥淎 rtists.鈥?

								
To top