Fighting for the Seats Gender Quota and State Feminism in South Korea

Fighting for the Seats: Gender Quota and State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan Chang-Ling Huang Department of Political Science National Taiwan University Gender Quota • Major Institutional Design to Increase Women’s Representation, Electoral as well as Non-Electoral • Electoral Representation: Widely Adopted, over 90 Countries (Constitution, Election Laws, Party Rules) • Non-Electoral Representation: Less Discussed, but no Less Important (Norway) State Feminism • When Feminists Enter the State, Femocrats • International Trend/Post-Cold War Politics • The 4th World Conference on Women ( Beijing 1995) • Gender Mainstreaming/Policy Tools • Target 30% Argument • gender quota literatures focus on electoral representation, but non-electoral representation is also, if not more, important. • In comparison to South Korea, Taiwan performs better in electoral representation, but worse in non-electoral representation. • The reason: different institutional environment for the development of State Feminism Gender Quota and Electoral Representation • Global Trend • Electoral system matters: PR most compatible, Single-member district, least compatible • South Korea and Taiwan: mixed system, single-member district plus party list Global Trend: Women in National Parliaments 60 50 40 % 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 Rank 2002 2007 6 7 8 9 10 Rank Country 1 Sweden 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Denmark Finland Norway Costa Rica Iceland Netherland Argentina Mozambique South Africa Women % Country 45.3 Rwanda 38 37.5 36.4 35.1 34.9 34 30.7 30 29.8 Sweden Finland Costa Rica Norway Denmark Netherland Cuba/Spain Argentina Mozambique Women % 48.8 47.3 42 38.6 37.9 36.9 36.7 36 35 34.8 Fem e M i n Sout h Kor ea and Tai w al Ps an 35 30 25 20 % 15 10 5 0 85 88 96 00 20 54 60 48 78 67 71 73 81 92 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 04 Year Korea Taiwan 19 0% 1% 2% 3% 4% 5% 6% 7% 8% 9% 50 53 56 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 83 86 89 92 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 Taiwan 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 Female Members in Local Assemblies S.Korea 95 98 01 04 07 Female County Magistrates 16% 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% 95 01 89 03 97 99 05 20 85 87 91 93 20 19 19 19 20 19 19 19 19 19 20 07 Year Taiwan S.Korea Femal City Council Members : Seoul and Taipei 40% 35% 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 19 69 19 71 19 73 19 75 19 77 19 79 19 81 19 83 19 85 19 87 19 89 19 91 19 93 19 95 19 97 19 99 20 01 20 03 20 05 Year Taipei Seoul Taiwan has more female representatives because……… • Pre-existed institutions. Reserved Seats for Women since the 1947 constitution. The quota remains 10% for years and became ceilings. • Major momentum appeared in the mid1990s. Demanded by feminist organizations. Target 25% • Party adoption. Quota is gender neutral. Less resistance from male politicians. Quota Type National Legislature (Party List) National Legislature (District) Local Assembly (Party List) South Korea 50% (9.35% of total seats) 30% Nomination encouraged. No Penalty. Financial Incenctives) 50% Taiwan 50% (15% of total seats) 0 Local Assembly (District) 30% Nomination encouraged. No Penalty. Financial Incenctives) SNTV: For every four elected, one must be a woman. (15%-25%) Female Parliamentary Members (Political Family) 70 62.5 60 51.5 50 41.1 40 % 30 20 10.3 30 10 3.4 0 Total District Korea Party List Taiwan Democracy and Non-electoral Representation • The Changing State-Society Relations in South Korea and Taiwan • Mutually embedded and mutually constituting • Proliferation of Government Committees and Public Commissions • The institutional barriers of elections Women in Government Committees 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Total Central Government South Korea Taiwan % Local Government State Feminism in South Korea and Taiwan • South Korea: 2001 Ministry of Gender Equality • Taiwan: 1997 Cabinet level Commission on the Promotion of Women’s Rights • Femocrats Led vs. Commissions Led Gender Quota in Education Taiwan Commission on Gender Equality Education, Ministry of Eduation Gender Equality Education Law 30% Gender Quota in Teachers Review Committee (gender neutral, all levels) Gender Quota in Education South Korea A Femocrat in Ministry of Education 200 out of 1000 new faculty positions Controversies and criticism Tentative Conclusion • Gender and democracy • The goal of quota: implementing the quota to make quota eventually meaningless • more attention should be paid to nonelectoral representation, whether from the research agenda of democratization or state feminism

Related docs
Feminism
Views: 55  |  Downloads: 6
History_of_feminism
Views: 60  |  Downloads: 5
South Korea
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 0
French_feminism
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 1
Feminism_in_India
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 2
Feminism
Views: 132  |  Downloads: 2
Longest River In South Korea
Views: 76  |  Downloads: 1
Electoral Politics in South Korea
Views: 134  |  Downloads: 2
Feminism
Views: 47  |  Downloads: 3
Fighting Back
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
gender studies
Views: 243  |  Downloads: 19
Other docs by sammyc2007