Excell Financial Analysis Reports for Healthcare

W
Description

Excell Financial Analysis Reports for Healthcare document sample

Shared by: nok58871
Categories
Tags
-
Stats
views:
6
posted:
2/3/2011
language:
English
pages:
45
Document Sample
scope of work template
							DRGs and Clinical Pathways:
     Chalk and Cheese
  or Cheese and Cheese?


                 RIC MARSHALL
          2008 CASEMIX CONFERENCE
CASEMIX EVOLUTION: EXTENDING THE BOUNDARIES
             16-19 NOVEMBER 2008
        ADELAIDE CONVENTION CENTRE
         Casemix and clinical pathways

 Some history and experience?
 What makes them happen?
 What do they have in common?
 What are the differences?
 How so they contribute to good healthcare?
 Do they have any adverse effects?
 How are they being used?
 What is the potential?
Where did casemix come from?


          NHIF            HEALTH SYSTEM
          MoH              OPERATORS,
       INSURERS             REGIONS,
        PATIENT               HMOs

 EMPLOYED PRACTITIONERS      HOSPITALS,
    Drug, MD SUPPLIERS     HEALTH CLINCS,
    SUPPORT SERVICES       PRACTITIONERS
     MANUFACTURERS
The halcyon days of DRG development
               POLITICAL WILL
                           POLICY
                           OFFICIALS




GOVERNMENT
MINISTERS




             INDUSTRY     EXPERTS
             EXECUTIVES
       The Epidemic of the DRG Grouper
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994
1993
1990
1989
1988
1987
                              Accountability 1
Look! You spent too much on
patient 15644




                                   But patient 15644 was
                                   different from normal
I've checked, and patient 15644
      wasn't different at all!
                                  Accountability 2



                                     Sorry, I'll try not to do it
                                     again
  „Casemix - a case of mixed priorities‟–Vic 98

Has the drive for efficiency gains contributed to the hospital                         NO OR
having to, in some cases, shift costs in the following areas:                  YES     OTHER
From hospital service providers to community-based providers (e.g. to
general practitioners, day clinics, community health centres) –                  50%     50%
From casemix/variable funded hospital units to casemix/fixed grant hospital
units –                                                                          16%     84%
From lower category hospitals to tertiary referral centres –                     12%     88%
From hospital-funded pharmaceuticals to Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme-
funded medication –                                                              33%     67%
From outpatient to Same Day inpatient (e.g. rehabilitation) –                    16%     84%
Transfers of post-acute inpatients down to lower category hospitals (e.g. to
small and rural hospitals) –                                                     36%     64%
From public hospitals to the Metropolitan Ambulance Service –                     2%     98%
From public hospitals to discharged patients –                                   25%     75%
OVERALL SHIFTING ????????????????????????????????????                            19%     81%
The grand vision for clinical
        pathways

      FROM DRG FUNDING TO CLINICAL
               PATHWAYS


           NHIF          HEALTH SYSTEM
           MoH            OPERATORS,
        INSURERS           REGIONS,
         PATIENT             HMOs
EMPLOYED PRACTITIONERS      HOSPITALS,
   Drug, MD SUPPLIERS     HEALTH CLINCS,
   SUPPORT SERVICES       PRACTITIONERS
    MANUFACTURERS
         The grand vision for clinical pathways

 Pieter and Don‟s work on clinical teams
       Delegated work, process specification approach to quality/efficiency.
 The Scottish website – and all the others -
 The cult of the „evidence based‟ guidelines
       The NICE program – making evidence based clinical guidelines
        accessible
       Clinical protocols
   The privacy and INFORMED consent movement
   The growth in clinical litigation
   The quality and safety in healthcare movement
   The electronic health record,
       templates,
       clinical decision support
       and the „archetype‟
       Why everyone wins:
pathways put clinicians in the centre

                                Controlling waste

 Clinical
 practice
 standards
                                          Ensuring
                                          customer
                                              focus

 Setting
 prices

                          Improving payment
                               classifications
   Integrating care
      Pathways and DRGs might connect

1:1     DRG 1                  Pathway A



        DRG 2
M:1                            Pathway B
        DRG 3




        DRG 4                  Pathway C

M:M
        DRG 5                  Pathway D
  Cookbook medicine or cookbook medicine

 DRGs as cookbook healthcare
   „If you pay hospitals the same for every patient they will do the
    same for every patient‟
 Clinical pathways as cookbook healthcare
   „If you give hospitals a clinical pathway for every patient they
    will do the same for every patient‟
 Does anyone want ‘non-cookbook’
  healthcare?
     Do we need more „tunnel vision‟ in healthcare?
     Focus and attention to detail?
 Are they really the same thing in a different form?
    Alternatives to „cookbook healthcare‟

 Creative healthcare?




 Sloppy healthcare?




 Inaccessible healthcare?
                         INFORMATION SYSTEMS
DRG LEVEL


                                       BUSINESS OBJECTS   COGNOS,BRIO, EXCELL
            SAS ,SPSS, STATA, ACCESS

             STATISTICAL                  REPORT                   REPORTING
                                                          CUBES
             ANALYSIS                   REPOSITORY
                                                          PIVOT    LAYER (MIS)

                                                                  DATA
                                            AED                   WAREHOUSE
                                            EMD           MH
                 Aggregate
                                            ESIS          DW        MH
                                               MDSs                 ODS
PATHWAY LEVEL
CLINICAL




   Oracle, SAP, etc
                                                                             MH
                                                                 MPI         CMI

             SUPPLY             HR            FMIS         PAS         EHR

                        BUSINESS LAYER
If they are not the same where do they
               intersect?
For a clinical pathway           FOR DRG’s you must
you must have:                   have:

  • an episode of care.            • an episode of care.
  • diagnoses.                     • diagnoses.
  • a care planning process.       • know what was done to the
                                   patient
                                       - at least in general terms.
  • a team approach to patient     • discretion in choice of the
  management.                      most cost effective care.
  • decisions made before the      • decisions made after the
  treatment is undertaken.         treatment is completed.
      What is a clinically meaningful DRG?

What do you get for a plane ticket from Ankara to Adelaide?


  Flight Ankara to              Additional services for
   Istanbul                         lost luggage
  Flight Istanbul to Hong         Flight crew 1 extra hour
   Kong                            Flight delay crew
  Flight HK to Melb                standby 4 hours
  Flight Melb to Adelaide         Engineering
                                    unsheduled repair
                                   Diversion to avoid
                                    storm, delayed landing
 “They think they need DRGs but what they
     actually need is clinical pathways”
 The Suisse recommendation in China


 The UK approach to mental health casemix
 classification

 Why has Turkey not gone ahead with DRG payment
 implementation yet?
The Suisse recommendation in
            China

 WHY GO TO DRG DEVELOPMENT
   WHEN YOU CAN FOCUS ON
  CLINICAL PATHWAYS FIRST?
     The Suisse recommendation in China

 Regionalised system of healthcare delivery.
 Strengthening lower end health institutions.
 Balance between:-
   Quality of care and spreading resources more equitably.

   Modern and traditional healthcare services???

   Universality and strengthened role for private health insurance
    to reduce out of pocket problems.
 Development of management tools – especially
  clinical pathways – performance measures.
 Do not proceed with DRG development until clinical
  pathways have been implemented.
                       ISSUES

 Uniform data collection and reporting.
   Settign performance improvement goals

   Measuring achievements.

 Records standards.
 System availability and standardisation.
 DRG‟s in POC stage in Beijing region.
 Trial funding simulations proceding this year.
 Private sector interest in the DRG tool for service
  planning and performance benchmarking.
 Greater public investment at the lower end.
 Reducing out of pocket.
The Beijing DRG Forum
       ENGLAND

   THE CURRENT ENGLISH
APPROACH TO MENTAL HEALTH
  CASEMIX CLASSIFICATION
The UK approach to mental health casemix
             classification
 A CLASSICAL DRG MDC APPROACH
 A MH-CASC LIKE PAYMENT CLASSIFICATION
  DEVELOPMENT
 A CLINICAL PATHWAYS BASED
  CLASSIFICATION FOR PAYMENT
 A SPECIFIC PURPOSE CLASSIFICATION FOR
  FUNDING FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH
  SERVICES
        RESOURCE HOMOGENEITY VS CLINICAL
            MEANINGFULNESS REVISITED




http://www.southwestyorkshire.nhs.uk/documents/440.pdf   http://www.ic.nhs.uk/webfiles/Services/casemix/Updates/Mental%20
                                                         Health%20End%20of%20Stage%20Report,%20FINAL.pdf
 T01 Senile Dementia
 T03 Schizophreniform          HRG v3.5 MH
    Psychoses without Section
   T07 Depression without      CATEGORIES
    Section
   T08 Presenile Dementia       DX BASED DSM4?
   T09 Anxiety Syndromes        BROAD SCOPE
   T10 Alcohol or Drugs Non-       Eg A&D INCLUDED
    Dependent Use >18
   T11 Alcohol or Drugs Non-    IP / OP ?
    Dependent Use <19            DATASET FOR
   T12 Alcohol or Drugs         GROUPER NORM
    Dependency
   T13 Eating Disorders or
    Obsessive Compulsive
    Disorders
   T14 Acute Reactions or
    Personality Disorders
                                                       UK PbR
 Cty No or std CPA Low prob daily act HONOS10
 Cty No or std CPA High prob daily act HONOS10
                                                       STUDY
 Cty Std CPA Low prob daily act HONOS10                SETTING
 Cty Std CPA High prob daily act HONOS10             DEPENDENT
 Cty Enh CPA Low prob daily act HONOS10              CATEGORIES
 Cty Enh CPA High prob occ act HONOS12               17

 Cty Enh CPA High prob occ act HONOS12                CATEGORIES
 Cty Enh CPA Low prob occ act HONOS12                SETTING/
 IP/OP no or std CPA working age                      PROBLEM / FN
 IP/OP no or std CPA above working age                BASED
 IP/OP enh CPA Low cog prob HONOS4 no section ord
                                                      CARE
 IP/OP enh CPA Low cog prob HONOS4 section ord
                                                       APPROACH
 IP/OP enh CPA High cog prob HONOS4 0-2 phys
  prob                                                SMALL

 IP/OP enh CPA High cog prob HONOS4 >2 phys prob      DATASET
 IP Low social prob HoNOS social                     COSTING?
 IP Med social prob HoNOS social
                                                      RELIES ON
 IP High social prob HoNOS social
                                                       HONOS
;W/o Section;No or std CPA;Dx= F0, F2, F5, F6, F7;;;

;W/o Section;No or std CPA;Dx=F1, F3, F4 ,F9;No or low prob daily
     activities (HoNOS 10);;                                              UK PbR STUDY
;W/o Section;No or std CPA;Dx=F1, F3, F4 ,F9;High prob daily activities   SETTING INDEPENDENT
     (HoNOS 10);Wkg age;
                                                                               CATEGORIES
;W/o Section;No or std CPA;Dx=F1, F3, F4 ,F9;High prob daily activities
     (HoNOS 10);Above wkg age;>3 HoNOS psych                                 ONLY WORKING
;W/o Section;No or std CPA;Dx=F1, F3, F4 ,F9;High prob daily activities       AGE +
     (HoNOS 10);Above wkg age;1-3 HoNOS psych

;W/o Section;Enh CPA;Dx=None, F1, F7, F8;No or low prob daily
     activities (HoNOS 10);;
                                                                             LEGAL, DX AND
;W/o Section;Enh CPA;Dx=None, F1, F7, F8;High prob daily activities
     (HoNOS 10);;
                                                                              HoNOS
;W/o Section;Enh CPA;Dx=F0, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F9;Med or hi CRU
     complexity;Low or no cognitive prob HoNOS4;
                                                                             78% RECORDS
;W/o Section;Enh CPA;Dx=F0, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F9;Med or hi CRU
     complexity;High cognitive prob HoNOS4;
                                                                              EDIT REJECTED
;W/o Section;Enh CPA;Dx=F0, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6, F9;Low CRU
     complexity;;

;W Section;>2 HoNOSpsych;Enh CPA;Dx= None, F1, F3, F4;;
                                                                             N=11,364 pat
;W Section;>2 HoNOSpsych;Enh CPA;Dx=F0, F2, F5, F6, F9;;

;W Section;>2 HoNOSpsych;No or std CPA;;;

;W Section;0-2 HoNOSpsych;;;;
   Acute non-psychotic low
   Acute non-psychotic med
                                  Categories
   Acute non-psychotic high    Suggested by the
    Non-psychot overval idea

   Non-psychot chaotic &
                                Care Path Study
    challenging
   Drug & alcohol                CARE PATH
                                   DEFINITIONS
   First episode psychosis
   Chronic severe low sympt      CLINICIAN
   Chronic severe high sympt      GROUPING VS
   Severe psychot episode         ALGORITHM
   Severe depression              GROUPING
   Dual diag
                                  COST VARIANCE
   Assertive outreach             ANALYSIS

                                  N=2,287 PATIENTS
  Ideas on classification dimensions
     from the forensic MH study.
                       DEMOGRAPHIC STUDY
 Socio demographic    DISTRIBUTION OF
 Offence               ACCESS AND SERVICE
 Clinical
                        PROVISION
                       SECLUSION AS
 IP/cty
                        MANAGEMENT TOOL
 Medico-legal
                       COSTS
 Seclusion
       TURKEY

WHY HAS TURKEY NOT GONE
AHEAD WITH DRG PAYMENT
  IMPLEMENTATION YET?
The Health Transformation Programme


                 Special
                 Funds

   GERF


                                        Universal
  Current Health Financing              Health
  Schemes
 SSK
                                Green   Insurance
                                Card
                                        01/01/2009
          Private          BAĞ-KUR
          Insurance




Financing Side 70M people
   Why is Turkey yet to go ahead with DRG
         payment implementation?
 Large scale access to detailed utilisation data.
 General view by the payer (3000 doctors as claims
  inspectors) that they can control efficiency and
  quality by examining detailed claims and rejecting a
  percentage of them.
 The idea of the clinical pathway as a post episode
  audit mechanism?
 Recent change of payment structure.
 Extremely cautious approach to coding quality.
  Component E, the objective and expected
                outputs...

  Analysis of cost differences in inpatient
  healthcare services by hospital types and regions

 DRG-based clinical coding and costing studies will be
  conducted in 40 hospitals that are able represent
  geographical distribution, distinct hospital types and various
  cost structures (evaluation)

 A management information system will be established to
  ensure central compiling and analysis of DRG clinical coding
  and costing data so that necessary information will be
  obtained for management of healthcare services (evaluation)
               Data Flow
                              Hospital Information Systems
                              Hospital Financial Data


          Minimum Basic Data Set-DRG                            Cost Sheet
          Data Entry Tool                                       -Allocation Statistics
          - Clinical Data, DRG
          - Resource Consumption Data
                                                                  (preparecostsheet)
                                         (analysistool)

                                                            (volumefile)   (costfile)

                                         (separationstbl)
              Diagnosis and Procedures
                                                                Combo Software
              Analysis Reports           PICQ Software

Coding Analysis Reports              Data Analysis Reports       Cost Reports
National Registries...

• Health Services Providers Registry
  (1200 Hospitals, 4500 Clinics - Total 23.000 Service Providers)
• Physican Registry
  (78.553 Physican)
• Medical Devices and Consumables Registry
  (2500 Firms, 1.052.347 Devices)
• Drug DataBase 6.800 Drugs
  (237 Drug company, 6849 Drugs)
• Medical Data Dictionary
  (SNOMED-CT, ICD-10TRM, ACHI, ATC, GMDN,
  UNSPS....National Codes )
   MEDULA


• Turkish National Health Insurance Fund MEDULA
 system
   • Web User Interface Online
     17800 Pharmacies, 5600 GP, 4500 Med. Centres
   • Web Services Offline
     1200 Govmt. Hospitals, 338 Private Hospitals

• An e-invoicing legislation has been passed by
 Parliament so no paper will be needed in 2009
              Online Running System NHIF MEDULA
                                                              HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEM

                           ELECTRONIC CLAIM PROCESSING                      STRATEGIC RESOURCE PLANNING &
 E-HEALTH                                                                   HEALTH ECONOMICS
SOLUTIONS
                                                            Health
                                           Patient          Transactions
                                           Database         Database
Healthcare                 Healthcare                                                             PROCUREMENT
Information                Providers                                        HUMAN
                                                                                                  &
Systems                    Application                                      RESOURCES
                                                                                                  INVENTORY
                                           Healthcare       Physican
                                           Providers        DataBase
                                           Database
Pharmacy
               WEB         Pharmacy
Automation
                           Application
                                                                            ELIGIBILITY &         ACCURAL
Systems        SERVICES
                                                                            CONTRACT              &
                                                                            MANAGEMENT            REIMBURSEMENT
                                           Medical
                                                            Provision &
                                           Data
                                                            Rule Engines
Diagnosis/                 Diagnosis       Dictionery
Laboratory                 Laboratory
SystemS                    Application                                      NATIONAL              INSURANCE
                                                                            HEALTH                PREMIUM
                                                                            PROGRAMS              COLLECTION
Family                     Family
               WEB                         Drug/Device      Contract
Practioners                Practioners     Database
               INTERFACE                                    Managemet
SystemS                    Application
                                                                            DECISION SUPPORT &
                                                                            NATIONAL HEALTH STATISTICS
                           Accural &
Ambulatory                                 Administrative   Medical
                           Reimbursement
Services                                   Rule Base        Knowledge
                           Application
                                                                            DOCUMENT & WORKFLOW
                         MEDULA Pharma Major Outcomes


   Reduction in the number of prescriptions (5 %)
   Reduction in the drug consumption (20-35 %)
   Merger of Claim Processing Units (58722)
   Reduction in the health expenses (5-25 %)
   Reduction in the outsourced lab and rad. tests happening due to LMHOM Syndrome
   Reduction of unnecessary health services use
   Detection of uncontrolled expensive drug usage
SOME METRICS...
 IN CONCLUSION

  DRGS AND CLINICAL
     PATHWAYS:
  CHALK AND CHEESE
OR CHEESE AND CHEESE?
IN SUMMARY CLINICAL PATHWAYS AND
           DRGs ………….
 Both could be used for payment
   but SHOULD they be?

 Both can describe generalised groups of patients
   DRGs by focus on need as described primarily by Diagnoses.

   CPs by focus on the detail of what is going to be done for the
    patient.
 DRGs are a post episode summary of the type of case
  it was in general terms.
 CPs are a working tool to help the team work
  together most efficiently DURING the episode.
 Both can be costed – DRGs after – CPs before.
                    So – chalk and cheese?


 Well actually bread and cheese

       They go very well together


   .

 THANK YOU

						
Related docs