Environmental Incidents Management Strategy
W
Description
Environmental Incidents Management Strategy document sample
Document Sample


THE DEA STRATEGIC PLAN 2010 - 2015
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND
PROTECTION (EQ&P)
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
MANAGEMENT
KEY PRIORITIES: EIM
• Continue with three high-level areas of focus:
– Regulatory function – Efficient and effective service delivery on EIA
– Systems and Tools development
• EIM strategy (Implementation of NEMA chapter 5)
• Information Management (NEAS and GIS)
• Law reform
– EIM Capacity & Awareness
• Implement Capacity action plan
• EMFs and guidelines
• Stakeholder capacity and pro-bono
• Work on baseline and indicator to measure impact of EIA
• Refine work to demonstrate alignment with Presidency M&E
– EMFs, guidelines etc integrated with municipal IDPs and SDFs
– Set of indicators for this to include Waste and Air Quality Plans and information
systems
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN :
Environmental Impact Management
• Strategic Objective 3: Protect and improve the quality and safety of the
environment
– KPA: Prevent and manage potentially negative impacts of development and
development patterns on the environment - with KPIs:
KPI Reason / Motivation
KPI (1): Policy and legislative framework for environmental impact
management developed
KPI (2): % of National Environmental Assessment applications Align with ENE
processed within prescribed timeframes provided that no more than
400 applications are received
[% of S24G applications processed within service standards] Rationalise KPI’s – included in KPI (2)
[% of pending ECA EIA applications processed]
[% EIA appeals finalised within timeframes] Legal Services’ work
KPI (3): Number of EIA administrators / officials trained in EIA
administration
KPI (4): % completion and implementation of Fee structure
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN :
Environmental Impact Management
KPI Reason / Motivation
[% implementation of SID guideline and ERP guideline] Included in KPI (7)
[Number of EIM applications reviewed] Rationalise KPIs – included in KPI (2)
KPI (5): Number of SANAP audit reports
[Number of Environmental Management Frameworks finalised] Rationalise KPI’s and alignment with
[Number of DEAT assisted EMFs] SONA priorities (M&E document) –
see new KPI (6)
KPA 6: Number of Municipalities with EMFs / SEAs Align with Presidency M&E documents
KPA 7: Number of procedural and technical guidelines on Omitted from 2009 Strat Plan –
Environmental Assessment Alignment document identified this
KPA 8: % completion and implementation of EIM Strategy
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN :
Environmental Impact Management
KPI Reason / Motivation
KPA 9: System for integrated environmental authorisations for DEA Departmental priority towards
improved service delivery
KPA 10: number of activities/ sectors for which standards i.t.o. New work – rationalising the use of
Section 24 (10) of NEMA developed per annum EIA – implementing NEMA
KPA 11: National Off-road Strategy implementation Not included in the Strat Plan resulting
in loss of financial resources
-NEAS (SO: Efficient service delivery)
-Registration of EAPs (SO: Tranformation)
- Mining Implementation Plan, MOU’s, SID etc (SO: Cooperative Governance)
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
REGULATORY SERVICES
KEY PRIORITIES: RS
• Dedicated time for Environmental crimes
in Courts
• Roll-out of EMI training and designation of
EMI to DWA and Local Government
• Compliance and enforcement blitz
• Establishment of the waste task team to
focus on waste-related compliance and
enforcement (e.g. health-care risk waste)
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN (Cont.)
• KPA: Ensure compliance with environmental legislation – with KPI’s –
– [Framework for Protected Areas (PA) performance management developed and
implemented]
– [Number of Management Plans for WHS approved]
– % of EQP related-complaints, notices and directives in relation to which reactive
inspections will be conducted
– Number of sector-based strategic inspections conducted
– Number of DEAT issued EAs inspected
– % of section 30 emergency incidents processed and finalised
– Number of criminal investigations finalised and dockets handed over for
prosecution
– Strategic compliance and enforcement operations in respect of Health Care Risk
Waste, Asbestos Regulations and Basel undertaken
– Strategic compliance monitoring tools and guidelines reviewed and developed
– Number of Environmental Management Inspectors trained
– Number of justice officials (prosecutors and magistrates) trained in environmental
crime
– Implementation plan for the roll-out of key EMI Standard Operating Procedures in
place
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT
KEY PRIORITIES: AQM
• Continued development and operation of
the South African Air Quality Information
System, especially the National
Atmospheric Emissions Inventory (incl.
GHG emissions);
• Rollout of new Air Quality Act regulatory
tools and guidance
• Support to the new Licensing Authorities
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN (Cont.)
• KPA: Improve Air and Atmospheric Quality
- with KPIs –
– Number of ambient quality monitoring stations
providing information to South Africa’s Air
Quality Information System SAAQIS
– Number of metros and district municipalities
with air quality that does not meet ambient air
quality standards
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
WASTE AND POLLUTION
MANAGEMENT
PROPOSED EQ&P AMENDMENTS TO THE
CURRENT DEA STRATEGIC PLAN
• KPA: Waste Management System that ensures less waste which is better managed,
with KPI’s –
– [Waste Management Strategy in place]
– Waste Management Act in effect, Regulations Developed & Implemented
– Waste Management Policies and strategies developed & Implemented
– Norms & Standards for Waste Management developed & Implemented
– Waste Minimisation Initiatives Developed
– Number of Waste Management facilities applications processed
– Waste Management Regulations in place
– Implementation phase of Plastic, Asbestos & Tyre Regulations
– Waste Management Guidelines in place
– % of IWMPS received that have been reviewed
– Norms and Standards to support waste Management Act developed
– Number of Waste Management facilities applications processed within legislated timeframes
– Number of applications from un-permitted/unauthorised waste disposal sites processed
provided 116 or more are received
– Number of [provincial] landfill managers [officials] trained on waste management [licensing]
KEY: Original text; New Text; [deleted text]
Headline Priorities for 2010-11
• Waste Balance Status Quo determination
• Provide support to National Cleaning & Greening
Programme
• Develop a labour-intensive service delivery model for
waste collection
• Development of course & Training of Municipal Landfill
site Managers & WMO’s
• PPP process with Treasury regarding a regional HCRW
treatment plant
• Facilitate increased funding of waste services provision;
waste services tariff aide memoire
• Launch of Waste Management Officers Forum at Waste
Indaba
• Review of recycling target with the paper and packaging
industry
EQP CHALLENGES
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Environmental Impact Management
• Strategic Plan – work done not reflected under ―other‖ SO’s - do we
place it under EQP SO?
– NEAS
– MIP
– EAPs registration
– Co-operative governance work
– MINTECH working groups
• The Mining Implementation Plan - the uncertainties, frustrations and
lack of progress due to things that are not within our control.
• Budget – HR capacity intensive area of work, provinces do not have
the capacity
• NEAS and public portal – progress???
• No baseline or indicator for impact of EIA – substantial increase in %
compliance monitoring required
• Information management and lack of GIS and other decision support
instruments at appropriate detail
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Regulatory Services
• Capacity building
– Improve the accuracy of National Compliance
and Enforcement Report;
– delay in the implementation and roll out of the
EMI- SAPS SOP.
• Capacity to substantially increase
monitoring of EAs to at least 10% of EAs
issued (currently only monitoring
compliance with less than 1%)
• Single Compliance and Enforcement unit?
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Regulatory Services
• Compliance and enforcement
– Lack of support from provinces in relation to
finalisation of inspection reports;
– Delays in issuing inspection reports to
inspected facilities impacts negatively on the
enforcement actions;
– Difficulties encountered in respect of un-
monitorable conditions;
– Delays in respect of prosecution
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Air Quality Management
• Information management
– Careful management of the DEA SAWS transfer of
air quality information service functions;
• The continued operation and maintenance of the SAAQIS
Phase I product;
• initiation of the SAAQIS Phase II – National Atmospheric
Emission Inventory (incl. GHGs) Project;
• Further rollout of the National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Network (Waterberg?)
– Heightened intergovernmental coordination and
cooperation following the APPA-AQA transition on 1
April 2010.
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Air Quality Management (Cont.)
• Policy, Regulation and Planning
– Finalisation of the Highveld Priority Area Air Quality
Management Plan;
– Declaration of the Waterberg Priority Area;
– Promulgation of licensing regulations and fee
calculator;
– 3rd generation ambient air quality standards (PM2.5);
– Increasing the use of other AQA tools (e.g. controlled
emitters; controlled fuels; priority pollutants, dust
regulations, etc.)
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Air Quality Management (Cont.)
• Air Quality Management Services
– Support to new licensing authorities, specifically in
relation to the licensing function;
– Managing the logistics of the APPA-AQA transition
(e.g. transferring hard-copy files; getting the new
authorities to use the licence database, etc.)
– Targeted, sector-specific interventions (fishmeal;
brickworks; etc.);
– Getting real delivery and results from the
implementation of the Vaal Triangle Air-shed Priority
Area Air Quality Management Plan
KEY CHALLENGES FOR 2010-11
Waste Management
• Lack of Prioritisation of waste
management across government
• Lack of reliable waste balance information
• Limited landfill management expertise &
capacity
• Limited compliant capacity for HCRW
ALIGNMENT WITH PRESIDENTIAL OUTCOMES
• Principle Outcome:
– ―Protect and enhance our environmental assets and natural resources‖
• Secondary Outcomes:
– ―Live long and healthy lives‖
– ―Ensure decent employment for people by facilitating and contributing to
inclusive economic growth‖
– ―Develop skills and capabilities to support an inclusive growth path‖
– ―Promoting rural development with a focus on former homeland areas‖
– ―Create sustainable human settlements and improve the quality of household
life‖
– ―Create stable and well-serviced communities with well planned and managed
Local Governments‖
– ―Create a better Africa and a better world — make our contribution to global
relations‖
– ―A public sector capacity that is efficient, effective and worthy of a
Developmental State‖
THANK
Forward to a YOU FOR
sustainable YOUR KIND
energy future ATTENTION
Related docs
Get documents about "