Pennoyer v Neff2

Reviews
Shared by: mrdildine
Stats
views:
232
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
8/21/2007
language:
english
pages:
0
Civil Procedure 8.29-9.2-05 quasi in rem (kway-sI in rem or kway-zI). [Latin "as if against a thing"] Involving or determining the rights of a person having an interest in property located within the court's jurisdiction. See action quasi in rem under ACTION (4). [Cases: Courts 18. C.J.S. Courts § 53.] personal jurisdiction. A court's power to bring a person into its adjudicative process; jurisdiction over a defendant's personal rights, rather than merely over property interests. -- Also termed in personam jurisdiction; jurisdiction in personam; jurisdiction of the person; jurisdiction over the person. See IN PERSONAM. Cf. in rem jurisdiction Pennoyer v. Neff   Mitchell claimed that Neff owed him money for legal services. After Neff had left the state Mitchell filed suite saying that he was owed more money. o Filed suite in Oregon o Secured jurisdiction under section 55  If defendant cannot be found after due diligence, he may be served by publication  Mitchell supplied affidavit that said that he could not be found and that he was in CA o Did not attach property  Published for 6 weeks in Christian newspaper o Default judgment issued followed with a writ of execution Judge Deady’s approach  He limited his decision to the question of whether there was quasi-in-rem jurisdiction o Based more on Oregon code o 3 objections to be considered  order of publication was made without sufficient evidence that Mitchell had cause against Neff  affidavit was in adequate  affidavit was made by the editor of eth newspaper rather than by the printer o Concluded that Mitchell in his affidavit did not give proper consideration to finding Neff Judge Field’s Approach  Found jurisdiction defect that negated the case o Never quasi-in-rem jurisdiction o Property not attached at the beginning.  Personam Jurisdiction was proper only where the defendant was served with process in the state.  Introduction of Due Process Clause English rule says that the looser pays the winners fee of all parties.

Related docs
Pennoyer v. Neff
Views: 554  |  Downloads: 1
Pennoyer v Neff
Views: 12  |  Downloads: 1
Pennoyer v Neff
Views: 575  |  Downloads: 8
Pennoyer v.Neff Case Brief
Views: 437  |  Downloads: 8
PENNOYER V. NEFF, 95 U.S. (5 Otto) 714 (1877)
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
PENNOYER SCHOOL CALENDAR FOR 2009- 2010
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
Hanson v. Denckla
Views: 395  |  Downloads: 1
International Shoe v. Washington
Views: 434  |  Downloads: 1
Bauer v. Bauer et al - 8
Views: 55  |  Downloads: 0
Wilkie_v_Robbins
Views: 7  |  Downloads: 0
International Shoe v Washington
Views: 26  |  Downloads: 1
premium docs
Other docs by mrdildine
Funny Political Pictures of Our Nation's Leaders
Views: 2766  |  Downloads: 48
Top 20 FUNNY Politician Pictures
Views: 6472  |  Downloads: 217
The Language of Accounting[1]
Views: 975  |  Downloads: 49
Fund Raising Sales Agreement
Views: 606  |  Downloads: 9
AGREEMENT OF SALE LATEST
Views: 632  |  Downloads: 3
The Caribbean Ecomics Report -- Part2
Views: 498  |  Downloads: 1
Montserrat Economic Report for 2006[2]
Views: 489  |  Downloads: 2
Jamaica Economic Report for 2006[2]
Views: 549  |  Downloads: 5
International Economic Developments[2]
Views: 426  |  Downloads: 1
Guyana Economic Report for 2006[2]
Views: 430  |  Downloads: 4
Grenada Economic Report for 2006[2]
Views: 423  |  Downloads: 2
Dominica Economic Report for 2006[2]
Views: 452  |  Downloads: 2