Get documents about "Complaining to Contractor
Description
Complaining to Contractor document sample
Document Sample
Summary of amateur and professional product cases from 2002 to 2005
Year
2002 2003 2004 2005 Total Percent
Number age of
Type User Type No. % No. % No. % No. % of cases cases
Involving one or more children Amateur Use 12 9% 20 13% 24 14% 26 16% 82 13%
Professional Use 7 5% 3 2% 2 1% 5 3% 17 3%
Unknown 1 1% 1 0%
Involving one or more children Total 20 15% 23 15% 26 15% 31 19% 100 16%
Other Amateur Use 58 42% 79 52% 75 42% 72 44% 284 45%
Professional Use 57 42% 49 32% 73 41% 54 33% 233 37%
Unknown 2 1% 1 1% 3 2% 5 3% 11 2%
Other Total 117 85% 129 85% 151 85% 131 81% 528 84%
Grand Total 137 100% 152 100% 177 100% 162 100% 628 100%
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
2002 Professional Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
aldicarb + pencycuron + NA Patent had died a month after using the products. Safety Data Contacted the doctor and provided all the requested information.
imazalil Sheet was requested by a doctor as the case was being handled by No further contact from Procurator-fiscal. (see accompanying
the Procurator-fiscal. Doctor did not suspect product. Suspected a background note)
heart attack.
aluminium phosphide Not given but had been treated for When the product was used the callers son was close to the Symptoms not given but hospital treated him for exposure. Safety
exposure product working inside poultry shed. The product was used by an Data Sheet was sent to the caller. Also informed senior regulatory
employee outside the shed. He was not aware callers son was business managers.
inside the shed. On smelling the product the callers son left the
shed. Caller son reported to be exposed to product 4 days ago.
Caller requested a copy of Safety Data Sheet.
aluminium phosphide Dizziness and sick A man felt sick and dizzy for 24hrs after buying a flask. The flask Advised to contact GP if they're still concerned
had not been opened.
aluminium phosphide Feeling unwell and tiredness for 10 days Caller's friend had been using a number of chemicals recently Advised to contact GP and take details of all chemicals used.
including this product. Callers friend had been feeling unwell for the Informed senior regulatory business managers
last 10days and tired. The details of how the product had been
used were withheld by the caller.
bifenthrin Rash on hands Used the product 2 1/2 weeks earlier. Recommended to see a GP
biteranol + fuberidazole Minor Enquiry only - Dust inhalation. Referred to GP
bitertanol + fuberidazole Feeling unwell Farmer used the product and now feels unwell. Passed to company doctor
chlormequat Rash Worker had used product to treat poinsettias. Handled plants more Caller advised unlikely that product had caused rash. Referred to
than a day later and developed a rash. Safety Data Sheet, product not a skin irritant or sensitiser.
chlormequat Not in direct contact - None Caller concerned that her children had been playing and eating a Safety Data Sheet checked - toxicity proved to be fairly low. Any
picnic on a field which had been sprayed with product the previous sign of anything abnormal they should be taken to a doctor with the
day. containers that caller found in the field.
chlorpropham Respiratory difficulties Had the respiratory problems after spraying the product in a potato After a discussion with the doctor it was found that the problem was
house. from a pre-existing condition of emphysema due to long term
smoking.
1/10/2011 2
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
clodinafop-propargyl + Sick Farmer had been spraying a filed next to a primary school with a Head teacher had reported incident to the HSE who were due to
trifluralin mixture of products according to approval conditions. Weather arrive on the farm within an hour. Conformed to farmer that there
conditions good and only a light wind. Farmer spraying over 100m was nothing in the product formulation to give rise to concern and
(mostly 300-400m away) from school. Several children had that heavy aromatic referred to in the Safety Data Sheet was
detected a chemical solvent smell and two had been sick.
clopyralid + 2, 4-D + MCPA One eye not focusing very well Caller was walking on the other side of hedge when the spray came Advised to go and see the doctor
along. Walker wanted to know if the product the farmer was
spraying was safe. No indication that spray went over the hedge.
Family also on the walk but did not have any symptoms
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Swollen joints, puffy eyes and a rash on Golf player got symptoms after playing on an area that had been Company supplied and explained the Safety Data Sheet to the GP
MCPA lower legs treated by product.
cymoxanil + mancozeb Unwell Bystander concerned that he had been exposed to spray drift of Company gave farmer information on the product. HSE followed up
sulphuric acid. sulphuric acid wasn't being used at the time. the complaint but now follow up information was received by the
company.
cyproconazole + cyprodinil No symptoms Children playing in a field recently sprayed with product. Parent Parents advised to keep an eye on the children. If condition
had washed the children and there was no sign of irritation. changes contact a GP. Product has potential to sensitise as stated
on the label.
dicamba + mecoprop-P Rash and breathlessness User reported illness to Doctor after spraying. Awaited further information from supplier. No further contact was
made.
dichlobenil Breathlessness, sweating, weak limbs Council worker, working with the product felt unwell after use. Company toxicologist compared symptoms with results of animal
Suspected a colleague of deliberate poisoning. tests. No correlation. Offered direct contact with company doctor-
not taken up. Case closed
dichlofluanid None stated Eaten a bowl of strawberries that had been treated 3 days earlier. Caller told he should have no problems but if he feels unwell then
Wanted to know why harvest interval is 2 weeks for strawberries see a doctor. Explained that the harvest intervals are set according
but 2 days for tomatoes. to residue data.
difenzoquat None Patient splashed product in his eye whilst opening a container. Safety Data Sheet checked for treatment information. Advised to
wash the eye for 15 mins.
epoxiconazole + Chest pains Farmer sprayed field with product and neighbour inhaled some. Advised to see doctor for a check up.
pyraclostrobin
ethofumesate + bromoxynil Rash and skin irritation 5yr old boy playing in a field the day after it had been sprayed. Passed to company doctor
+ ioxynil Woke up the next day with rash and irritation.
ethofumesate + bromoxynil Swollen upper lip Child flying a kite in a field the day after it had been sprayed. Was Could have been exposure but also cant rule out horse
+ ioxynil taken to A&E but they could not say whether is was exposure to urine/manure etc. Passed to company doctor
product. Administered antihistamine and kept in for two days
1/10/2011 3
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
flufenacet + pendimethalin no symptoms Caller's son splashed on arm with spray solution containing the Advised to have skin washed thoroughly with soap and water and
product. also clothing.
flufenacet + pendimethalin Nausea, headache Farmer spraying field with product. Caller approx 0.5 mile away If he continues to feel unwell advised to visit his doctor.
and inhaled some of the spray and felt nauseous and complained
of a headache.
fluroxypyr Burning feeling in the stomach Farmer using product with a knapsack, blockage occurred and the Contacted Company doctor, advised not likely caused by the
farmer blew the nozzle. Approx 5 hours late had a burning feeling in product. Follow up the next day. Everything is ok.
the stomach. No tingly effect round mouth.
fosthiazate Sore throat A van driver developed a sore throat after working with leaking Advised to contact GP. Follow up, penicillin prescribed as GP
containers. diagnosed a throat infection
glufosinate-ammonium None A member of staff spilt the product on themselves. Advised to remove contaminated clothing and shower.
glyphosate Skin rash Council Street Cleaner developed rash after handling treated Pointed out product is not a skin irritant. That rash caused by other
weeds. irritant weeds or could be the after effect of a virus. Offer of
consultation with medical expert not taken up.
glyphosate Severe headache and irritation in the Some spray inhaled by the person using the product. Told to see a doctor as soon as possible. Follow up call made and
airways message left on ansafone requesting update. No reply was
received
glyphosate Sickness and diarrhoea Operator felt unwell after using glyphosate using tractor mounted Advised to see doctor for a check up.
sprayer.
glyphosate Skin rash Spray operatives from the same council developed skin rashes. No Company doctor visited both patients. Consultant dermatologist
recognised exposure. diagnosed acute guttate psoriasis - a late consequence of recent
respiratory tract infection. The second may have been a reaction to
amoxycillin.
glyphosate None. Two teenagers allegedly in contact Council operatives applied the herbicide to pavements as Sent information about safety of after accidental inhalation of drift to
with spray drift teenagers passed. mother of teenagers. Offered further assistance not taken up.
glyphosate Palpitations & weakness Middle aged man with vague symptoms of weakness and Man's GP spoke to company's medical consultant and was
palpitation. No exposure and no reason to attribute symptoms to satisfied the symptoms were not related to product
product
glyphosate Sickness, stomach pains & diarrhoea Agricultural spray operator used product and subsequently became Discussed medical aspects. Satisfied sickness was unrelated to
ill. He contacted his supplier who contacted the company for spraying operation
reassurance there was no connection.
mancozeb Rash on arms and neck Operator developed a rash each time they went onsite. Saw doctor for an allergy test and local skin specialist
1/10/2011 4
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + clopyralid + Stomach cramps and diarrhoea The callers husband had been using the product yesterday. Asked how he used the product and there was no indication that he
fluroxypyr had been heavily exposed. Advised the caller the product is of very
low toxicity and should not cause any adverse health effects.
Advised to see a doctor if symptoms persist.
mecoprop-P + 2, 4-D Sore throat, numb tongue Inhaled spray drift whilst walking around the grounds of a hotel Told the caller to see their doctor. She didn't and symptoms passed
while spraying taking place.
metalaxyl-m Swelling around the eyes and severe No details of incident given. Product is labelled as a potential sensitiser. Doctor prescribed
blistering rash on arms and neck. antihistamines and cream. Followed up by company doctor.
metamitron Tight chest User videoed a farmer who she believed sprayed under Details recorded in incidents scheme
inappropriate conditions. Complaining of exposure to herself and
damage to garden plants.
metazachlor N/K Farmer had complaint neighbour saying he had been poisoned by Company advised farmer that unlikely that product would have
crop spraying. Product had been diluted to correct level and wind adverse effect and that neighbour should be advised to seek
direction was away from neighbour's property. medical advice.
metazachlor N/K Farm worker sprayed with diluted mixture of product from broken Advised farm worker that product may cause skin irritation but not
boom. Had washed straight away and rinsed eyes. likely to damage eyes and not classified as poison.
paraquat + diquat Blistered feet and rash Child developed blistering on their feet after playing bare foot on Caller was informed that diquat is listed as a sensitiser but paraquat
recently treated area. is not normal absorb through intact skin. Follow up call was made.
A company had been landscaping gardens in a housing project and
had sprayed the product to kill weeds. The hospital i
pencycuron + imazalil Abdominal pains Farm labourer diagnosed with abnormal liver function. Awaiting Company doctor diagnosed gall stone in common bile duct with
results of viral antibodies tests. Had approached manufactures of ascending cholangitis.
products he had used 6 months previously. There had been no
abnormal exposure.
pirimiphos-methyl Experienced shivering, felt very cold, Had used the product in a silo with an unapproved mask and no On company advice that he seek medical attention the caller visited
chest ache and a cough 4 days after other form of protection. Was reluctant to seek medical advice. Said A&E. Had produced chest x-ray that showed shadows that my have
cleaning he had previously contacted the company regarding the use of been caused by inflammation. Prescribed ibuprofen which has
masks. Had been advised if he had been exposed to this product relieved the symptoms. Further tests to be undertaken. Further f
he should stay completely at rest. The caller had not worn gloves or
any other PPE other than the mask contrary to label advise. The
chemical has the potential to be absorbed through the skin.
1/10/2011 5
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
pirimiphos-methyl Irritation and blurred vision in eye User got diluted solution in his eye. Had rinsed but still had an Told to rinse the eye for another 10-15mins. If symptoms persist
irritation. Dilution about one in a hundred then seek medical advice. Follow up call made. Advice had been
followed and there were no further symptoms.
pirimiphos-methyl Burning rash on face Caller experienced a burning rash on is face when using this Company doctor contacted caller. Advised it maybe sensitisation.
product. Having wearing fully protected clothing except face mask. Advised to cover up all exposed skin. Follow up call made, no
Seemed to be linked to the product dripping onto his face or mist further reaction to product since using full PPE. Company Doctor
from the spray as problem is restricted to his face. Had used the advised if problems get worse stop using the product.
product for 3 years with no problems until now. Had consulted
doctor who was unsure what to do.
pirimiphos-methyl headaches and vomiting Exposure to product whilst cleaning a grain silo. Only one of the two Advised to see doctor. Instructions are not to breathe dust. The
people involved person had worn a mask That evening was feeling symptoms do not sound like acute poisoning with product. Advised
unwell with headaches and vomiting. Other members of the family to see GP. Followed up and daughter had had blood tests and was
had eaten the same meal and were well so that was ruled out. returning to see doctor about her chest infection. On follow
propamocarb hydrochloride Headaches, sweating, sore throat Request from Doctor for symptoms that maybe expected following Company doctor responded
+ mancozeb exposure to spray drift.
tebuconazole + Suffering from ill health Farmer was spraying and the boom went over a hedge. Person Faxed safety data sheet and asked HSE to keep then informed
carbendazim caught in spray while on road
tebuconazole + triazoxide Rash User had handled treated barley some weeks earlier and Doctor told the product is of very low toxicity and is unlikely the
developed a rash. Not feeling generally unwell and questioning the cause of any ill health. Doctor considered product unlikely to be
contamination of product with treated seed. Had request cause of ill health and declined the offer of the Safety Data Sheet
information on toxicity and irritation risk for the product.
thiacloprid Migraines Employee visited Doctor after using the product. Company doctor directly in contact with the employer
thiacloprid Migraines for over a year User used the product on 17/09/02 and suffered from migraines Company doctor responded. Case closed on basis that no ongoing
ever since. Wants to discount the product as possible cause if issues detailed by handler 17/06/03
illness.
triadimenol + fuberidazole + User became unwell and blacked out 2 or Caller blacked out whilst using the product. Passed to company doctor
imidacloprid 3 times
triclopyr Rash on arm Caller had been using product in bucket and had rinsed it once. 3 Caller was advised that it was unlikely to be the product but to
weeks later his wife used it to fill up her sons paddling pool. Their contact a doctor is the rash persisted. Follow up call made, child
son had a rash on his arm. Other children who had been in the pool was now fine and parents think it had probably been a heat rash
had no symptoms.
1/10/2011 6
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
triclopyr None stated A break in had occurred at a company premises and product Faxed data sheet to caller and explained anyone not wearing the
spread around the offices. Office had been cleaned but caller was correct clothing during the clean up should consult their GP if they
worried about the vapour. felt unwell.
triclopyr + clopyralid Collapsed Farmer collapsed and taken to A&E. He had been applying the Was reported by the Poisons Information Service Newcastle who
product and my have inhaled the solution or concentrate. just wanted the Safety Data Sheet
triclopyr + clopyralid Loss of sensitivity to fingers, sore throat, A few days after applying with gloves and mask. Using product Strongly suggested caller see a doctor
headache within restrictions.
triclopyr + clopyralid Red sore eyes Bottle spilt in Landrover. When the Landrover was cleaned (1 Advised to visit A&E. Given eye patch and drops.
month later), the product splashed into callers eyes.
triclopyr + clopyralid + Skin irritation and shortness of breath Pipe burst when using the product. Drenched in dilute spray. Sent Was reported by the Poisons Information Service Newcastle -
fluroxypyr to A&E by GP. wanted the Safety Data Sheet
triclopyr + clopyralid + Blisters on legs Operator used the product in a knapsack (not a label Told it wasn't likely to be the product that caused the blistering.
fluroxypyr recommendation). Employee in adjacent field not wearing PPE
developed blisters on legs.
triclopyr + clopyralid + Nausea Operator used the product in a knapsack (not a label Advised to go and see the doctor and if necessary for the GP to talk
fluroxypyr recommendation). No PPE. One day later felt nauseas to the company doctor
trifloxystrobin Sore and stinging eyes Caller complaining about spray drift had got into her dads eyes. Advised to go to GP or casualty. Follow up, stinging had gone.
Also concerned about her organic veg and sheep may have been Safety Data Sheet sent to caller on request
contaminated.
trifloxystrobin N/K Possibly drank a bottle of Swift. Found later that no Swift had been None
consumed but had taken too many anti-depressants.
triticonazole + imazalil N/K Robust splashed in the eye. Provided specific treatment advice
2002 Amateur Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
imidocloprid None - Child discharged soon after Child ate two packets of the product. Company faxed over the data safety sheet. Very low toxicity
malathion Blurring in one eye Had been using the product the day before. Wondered whether Advised it wasn't likely to be the product. Although the product
blurring could have been caused by getting product in his eye would cause eye irritation the caller was wearing glasses and there
was too big a time delay before the symptoms occurred. Caller
intended to visit his ophthalmic consultant that afternoon.
pirimiphos-methyl Feeling sick and stomach pains The caller had eaten carrots that had been treated with the product. Product is of low toxicity under usual conditions of handling and
They had been washed before eating. Had seen a doctor but still use. The stomach pains need to be treated by a medic and caller
had stomach pains. was advised to seek medical advice
1/10/2011 7
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Heart failure Caller used product then collapsed with heart failure. Caller There was some confusion about the product in question. The case
ferrous sulphate believed the product caused his medical condition. was discussed with PSD. The identity of the product was never
confirmed. Caller has written to local MP concerning this case and
lodged a complaint.
tar oil Slight rash on hands, face and arms Sprayed some trees with this product four hours ago. Advised to wash with soap and water then rinse for 15 minutes and
if symptoms worsen seek medical advise.
bifenthrin Watery eyes, losing her voice and Had been spraying in a confined area. Symptoms started 12hrs Advised to see her GP.
tightness of chest. later
paraquat + diquat + Numb thumb Got some on hand a week ago and thinks some had got through Went to see the doctor but thought she hadn't been taken seriously.
amitrole + simazine the skin under a broken nail. Asked to call back in a week if there was still a problem. There is no
antidote to skin exposure. Advised to go back and see the doctor.
paraquat + diquat + Hot and rash over body. Caller had walked bare foot over a previously treated area. Caller was asked if had any cuts on feet. Because the caller did she
amitrole + simazine Reported symptoms 3 days later. Symptoms re-occur every was advised to see her GP immediately and take the pack with her.
evening when in the kitchen and caller is hot.
2,4-D + mecoprop-P Rash on chin Caller had been using product 2 days ago and may have brushed Advised that although the product is classified as an irritant it is
her chin with a gloved hand that was contaminated with product. unlikely to be the cause in this instance as exposure is small but
Did not wash substance off until some hours later. advised her to seek medical attention and take package.
bifenthrin Funny tasting food, feels like a hangover, Caller's husband had been using the product in their garage. Advised the product wasn't likely to be the cause of the problem.
aches and pains, stomach cramps, Symptoms do not match expected toxicity. Low toxicity product.
diarrhoea and has elevated blood Caller had only used a small amount of product - unlikely to be
pressure. cause. Recommended he goes to his GP.
bifenthrin Feels unwell. Product had blown into caller's face. Wondered could the product Advised the product wasn't likely to be the cause of the problem by
be the cause or could it be flu? inhalation at such low exposure.
diquat Rough feeling and funny taste in mouth Doctor phoned. Patient had used the product several weeks ago Advised of the facts on the data sheet and faxed the Safety Data
and now felt unwell. Patient had used about four fifths of a litre on Sheet to the doctor. Suggested that he contacts the Poisons Unit
the garden. and company doctor.
diquat Hands swelled up like a balloon and his Child playing where the product had been sprayed onto weeds. The child was taken to the GP who said the product was likely to be
face ballooned responsible for his symptoms. Doctor wanted to know what the
active ingredient of product was. Child had never had an allergic
reaction to the weeds involved. A copy of the Safety Data Sh
1/10/2011 8
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
bifenthrin Tight chest and sore throat Caller had ornamental logs in a bedroom that were infested with Checked Safety Data Sheet. Advised the caller the product is of
bugs. He had sprayed ornamental logs outside with most of a can very low toxicity and should not cause any adverse health effects
of product and left them for 15-20 hours in sealed polythene bags but stressed that some people do have adverse reactions to
before placing them back in the bedroom. 12hrs later he had slept chemicals. Urged him to see a GP for a medical opinion
in the bedroom. Woke up with tight chest and sore throat and
wondered whether product was responsible.
malathion Cough and extreme muscle weakness. Caller was spraying product on a very windy day. Told the caller to get the GP to phone company if necessary.
Muscle weakness is one of a number of symptoms of poisoning
with the product. Offered to discuss symptoms with caller's doctor.
paraquat + diquat + Upset stomach and diarrhoea Caller used 11 sachets of product on her drive and as far as she Advised caller that since she had not exposed herself to product
amitrole + simazine was aware she had used product correctly and had not ingested, beyond normal usage it is unlikely to have caused her symptoms.
spilt or inhaled product. Usually gardener would do this work but he Explained the product is very unlikely to be the cause of her
was away. After using product began to feel unwell with sickness reaction. Even if she had inhaled dilute product it was unlikely
and diarrhoea. Next day ill in bed. Day after that used product
again. Again although she felt she had used product correctly she
felt unwell with diarrhoea.
diuron + glyphosate Rash on hands and neck Caller had used the product 5 days earlier. Caller had seen doctor who prescribed steroids and she now
trimesium wanted to complain about poor gun design and lack of info on the
container
paraquat + diquat Not been feeling well but symptoms not Caller thought she might have inhaled some of the product a week Advised inhalation is unlikely to be a problem under normal
stated ago. conditions of handling and use. Caller was reassured that she had
used product correctly. The product wasn't likely to be the cause of
the problem
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Suffering from Urticaria Suffering from Urticaria which came up shortly after he had used Advised it could be a reaction to a plant as a surprising number of
ferrous sulphate the products. Wondering if the products were the cause. Had been common plants can cause rashes.
exposed for a maximum of half an hour. Used some of the previous
year's product. Also wondered if prawns might be the cause.
glyphosate + diuron No symptoms Wind changed direction unexpectedly and caller got mist in her eye. Reassured caller that she was unlikely to see any symptoms given
the small amount of product involved but advised her to visit the
doctor if any symptoms occur.
1/10/2011 9
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
paraquat + diquat + Creamy lump on the white of eye Caller had been working with the product. He had a creamy lump Reassured the caller the product is unlikely cause. Advised to seek
amitrole + simazine on the white of his eye and could not remember getting anything in medical attention without delay. He agreed he would do so.
it during the day
paraquat + diquat + Allergic reaction Callers son had sprayed weeds with product as per instructions. Caller was concerned that he had a reaction six days later and
amitrole + simazine Three or four days later caller had been pulling up the dead weeds. wanted to know whether it could be product. Believes packaging
At this time he grazed his knuckles on the patio. The next day he may need alteration to warn others. Believes product is the cause.
felt a little unwell and the next day he started some form of allergic The NECK opened the Safety Data Sheet but it was not necessary
reaction and was rushed to hospital. Spent some time in critical
care and had now been released from hospital. Hospital think
reaction may have been due to product. Other medication he is
taking has been ruled out.
bupirimate + triforine + Bad rash and blistering Caller's partner had brushed up against a bush that had been Had been to his doctor who had suggested antihistamine and
pirimicarb sprayed 5 days earlier. Developed rash and blistering. calamine however the rash has got worse with blistering now
present. Checked the Safety Data Sheet. The product is classed
as a skin irritant but not classed overall as a sensitiser. Told him to
MCPA + dichloroprop-P + Sore throat Caller used as instructed. Had sore throat later which lasted a few Complaint logged. Checked if other incidents had occurred. No
ferrous sulphate hours but went with no other symptoms. other incidents of sore throats reported by end users.
glyphosate Various symptoms - Lady with a damaged Lady has multiple chemical sensitisation & reacts to any chemicals Company doctor involved in discussion and advice. Company
immune system in environment. Believes that any use of glyphosate in any discussed with local authority will undertake to notify her in advance
formulation within several miles makes her ill. of any spraying
imidacloprid Mild stomach upset more acute in last 3 Used the product Christmas 2001 (reported 21/02/02) and felt Faxed data sheet to retailer, do not believe product was the cause.
weeks unwell ever since. Advised to see GP
difenacoum Itching, red skin, hands and face swollen Possible allergy to the product. Explained that an allergic reaction could not be discounted, advised
to avoid contact with rodenticides. Company reported to
manufacturer
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + Cough & headache Subject inhaled dust from lawn that had been sprayed 1.5 weeks Advised that this is probably a coincidence, but should see GP
mecoprop-P ago. Complaining of symptoms ever since.
copper sulphate + Developed tightness of chest Opened can and was knocked back by smell. 3 days later feeling Advised to see GP or out patients. Obviously suffering but the
ammonium carbonate unwell, had tightness of chest and uneasy sleep. product may not be the cause. Product is classed as irritant.
glyphosate None Backpack of undiluted product accidentally sprayed into someone's Advised to rinse the eyes and see a doctor if any problems occur
face. Wiped face but did not clean eyes. Went home and started to
worry about eyes in the evening so called company.
1/10/2011 10
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Unknown. Patient thought he may have inhaled glyphosate weed killer. Company faxed information to hospital. Offered further help but
nobody came back.
glyphosate Vomiting 5 Year old child might have had slight exposure to spray. Taken to Company medical consultant spoke with National Chemical
A&E. Principal symptom is vomiting. Emergency Centre and hospital and the product is thought to not
be the cause. Advised there is unlikely to be toxicological link
between a minor contact of diluted product and vomiting.
bifenthrin Skin irritation Caller got some of the product on his arms and legs 6 weeks ago He has been to his Doctor twice since. Doctor suggested it would
and still experiencing skin irritation. clear up of its own accord. The Safety Data Sheet suggests the
product is unlikely to be harmful to the skin but caller advised to
see doctor. Advised that if he is having skin problems he
copper oxychloride No symptoms Caller had drank 1/2 a cup of diluted product 5 mins. earlier. Caller felt well. Asked about dilution - caller said it had been diluted
Wanted to know if the product was poisonous. according to instructions. Container had a small amount of solids
settled in the bottom. Given small amount ingested caller was
advised to remain aware during next 24 hours. Told her
bifenthrin Burning white blisters on neck Product dripped from leaking pack on a shelf in a garden centre on Garden Centre had got the customer to wash with cold water.
to customer. Advised that symptoms would subside in 12 hours but it would be
wise to see her GP and take the package.
triforine + bupirimate + not stated Used the wrong product and breathed the in fumes from the Information provided to GP who wanted to know what the active
pirimicarb product in an enclosed area . Experienced problems since. ingredient was
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Red eyes Product had blown into caller's husbands face a few hours earlier Advised to wash eyes for at least 10mins. Substance is an irritant
ferrous sulphate when he had been using product. Had washed eyes for a few mins. and can cause mechanical irritancy. Symptoms should go but if
but they were still red. they don't then seek medical advice
diquat Face tingles slightly Product vapour had blown into caller's face which he immediately Caller advised substance is not poisonous or irritant. Advised to
washed and rinsed out his mouth. wash with soap and water then rinse for 15 minutes. Tingle is not
unusual and should go away. Caller confirmed it was already doing
so. If symptoms occur he was advised to seek medical advi
pirimicarb Burst blood vessel in eye Got the product in his eye. Next day he had a burst blood vessel in Advised to seek immediate medical advice as the product is irritant.
his eye
paraquat + diquat Bitter taste in mouth Some spray entered the mouth of the person using the product. Did Caller advised he had done the correct thing in washing his mouth
not swallow out. Unlikely to be any effect at so little exposure. Told to visit the
doctor if any symptoms occur.
1/10/2011 11
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P Dry irritated hands Caller had difficulty opening the packet. It broke open and covered Advised the product wasn't likely to be the cause of the problem but
his hands. there is sand in it which might cause irritation. The caller said he
had cuts on his hands these may contribute to the symptoms if the
substance has got into them Told to seek medical a
diuron + glyphosate Eye irritation Splashed some of the product in eye and now had some eye Advised to wash the eye for 15mins. Product may cause eye
irritation. irritation but tests show that it is minimal. If symptoms persist seek
medical ophthalmic advice
paraquat + diquat + No symptom 22 month old child drank 10mls of diluted product one hour Sent Safety Data Sheet and confidential medical notes. Child was
amitrole + simazine previously. Doctor had consulted National Poisons Unit and Guy's well and no effects were seen..
hospital. Recommended plasma analysis before commencing
treatment. There is a 10 hour time window with this treatment. Child
appeared well. Activated charcoal was administered and urine
sample was about to be taken. If test was negative child would be
sent home, if positive a plasma analysis would be done. Likely
dose of a.i. was calculated and dose was so low that the emetic
concentration had not been sufficient to cause vomiting.
paraquat + diquat Vomiting and diarrhoea Using pressure sprayer caller had used two lots of product. The first Had not seen a doctor as she lives in the country and is not
lot she made too concentrated - 2 sachets per 2 litres (not 5). registered with a GP. Caller was strongly advised to go to casualty
Second lot she made correctly having noticed her mistake. Did get ASAP as her symptoms could be a result of paraquat poisoning and
product on her hands. Suffered vomiting and diarrhoea and needs to see a doctor as soon as possible. Said she would fin
blistered lips.
paraquat + diquat Sore arm Splashed a small amount of the product on his arm and affected Product is an irritant. Caller advised that if irritation persists he
area was sore. Wanted to know what he should do. should go to his doctor. He said he would within an hour.
glyphosate Red tongue that lost its 'furry' appearance. Caller had been using product a week ago and thinks she got some Caller had sought medical advice but had not seen a doctor. Still
Slightly swollen mouth in her mouth but did not swallow it. had some symptoms and wondered whether product had been the
cause. Advised the caller the product is of very low toxicity and
should not cause any adverse health effects. Some irritation of
diquat No symptoms given Doctor called wanting confirmation that the product does not Doctor was advised that there was no paraquat in the formulation
contain paraquat. A child had drunk some of the product. and discussed the lethal dose with him. Active ingredients are at
low concentration.
1/10/2011 12
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
paraquat + diquat + Itchy hands Caller used product in a pressurised container and some leaked Caller advised to wash the area the product had covered and to
amitrole + simazine over hand. This happened three days ago and caller now had launder his clothes. Advised him that the product was not classified
itching hands. Wanted to know whether weed killer was the cause. as an irritant.
Also worried that product would be absorbed through his skin.
paraquat + diquat + Vomited Doctor at hospital who is treating patient who had swallowed a Advised the two main ingredients were paraquat and diquat both at
amitrole + simazine sachet of product. Patient has vomited. Wanted to know what is 2.5%. Also contains a small quantity of paraquat emetic.
active ingredient and advice for treatment Appropriate advice was given on recommended treatment.
glyphosate Can feel it in veins and funny taste in Caller had come into contact a few days previously and had not Safety Data Sheet suggests that skin irritation is only likely to be
mouth washed it off his hands. He believes that he absorbed some slight and that absorption is unlikely to cause a problem. Caller
through his skin and since then he feels that he can feel it in his advised to seek medical advice to treat the symptoms.
veins and has a funny taste in his mouth. Had drunk 36 pints of milk
in the meantime.
diquat None given Sprayed the product on her legs a few weeks ago. Caller had seen her GP and given some cream and her legs are on
the mend. She wanted to know if there was a different cream that
would speed up her legs healing. Looked at Safety Data Sheet and
advised caller that there is no antidote and to talk to her G
diquat Red sore eyes Spray reflected back into callers eye 2/3 weeks ago. Did not wash Caller had seen an ophthalmologist and then a doctor but still had a
the eye straight away as he did not realise it had gone in his eye. problem. Advised of related information on the Safety Data Sheet
Since then it had been very red and sore. and referred him back to his doctor.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Blistering on arms Caller had used product in the Summer, some of the product ran Suggested callers doctor phones us. The Safety Data Sheet was
ferrous sulphate down callers arm and soaked into the cuff of his shirt. He had not checked and caller advised the product is unlikely to cause
washed it off immediately. It was now November. Later he found symptoms. Asked if his doctor had seen an Safety Data Sheet and
blistering of skin on area where shirt was wet. He visited doctor who was told that he hadn't. Suggested his doctor should be shown the
treated condition, however the rash has not subsided and he has Saf
had problems on and off ever since.
2,4-D + dicamba Slight skin irritation Worker at Garden Centre unpacking a leaking container of product. Advised to wash hands with soap and water and to seek medical
Slight irritation occurred possibly from leaking container. advice if symptoms persisted
2,4-D + mecoprop-P Sickness Product spilt onto users hands and hands cleaned with baby wipes. Complaint logged to see if any other similar incidents arose. None
Caller was sick a few hours later. No lasting effects. Sickness could were reported.
have been totally unrelated.
1/10/2011 13
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate None Child may of got product in the eye. Had been given inappropriate Company medical consultant spoke with National Chemical
advice by the hospital. Child was examined and no abnormality was Emergency Centre and hospital.
found.
glyphosate None stated Child possibly sprayed product into mouth. Faxed data sheet to retailer, do not believe product was the cause.
Advised to see GP
myclobutanil Sore throat Some powder blew into mouth. Explained non hazardous, sore throat could be due to dustiness
advised to see GP if symptoms develop.
aluminium ammonium Vomiting & diarrhoea Inhalation of product. Explained that product was unlikely cause
sulphate
imidacloprid None The product was ingested Safety data sheets faxed to hospital, explained product had low
toxicity. Child showed no symptoms
bifenthrin Eye contact sore eye Child spraying plants got some drift in eyes. Recommended wash eyes out if irritation persisted see a GP
Advised product not an irritant
glyphosate Neck ache Two children sprayed product at each other. Faxed data sheet to retailer, do not believe product was the cause.
Advised to see GP
metaldehyde Vomiting Subject thought by relative to have deliberately consumed product Explained symptoms would depend on amount consumed. The
in curry in suicide attempt. Subject vomited some of the meal. subject advised to consult a GP who would have access to the
national poisons information service . Based on perceived
consumption it was unlikely server symptoms would be seen.
sodium tetraborate (borax) Felt ill Felt ill two days after partner used the liquid and the container burst Expressed surprise on comment about fumes. Suggested seeking
in conservatory. No specific symptoms. medical advice if symptoms persisted
paraquat + diquat No symptoms Caller had been spraying dilute product and had got a minute Washing hands as she had done is the correct treatment. Product
amount of product on her finger. No ill health symptoms other than is irritant to skin. Caller told to visit the doctor in the unlikely event
funny taste in mouth that any symptoms occur.
2,4-D + mecoprop-P None stated Contact with face (Child). Advised to clean face with water
pepper None reported Contact with eyes and lips. Called child's parents. Child reported to be fine
myclobutanil Stomach cramps Ate strawberries which had been sprayed with product 2 days Product unlikely cause. Advised to see GP
earlier.
MCPA + mecoprop-P 3 days after using product flared and Product applied 2 weeks ago - no further info. Tried using anti Product is non-irritant and low toxicity. Caller advised to seek
painful hands histamines but this had not worked medical advice.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Cough and cold The product had been used 3 weeks ago. Caller had later scarified Advised that the product may be slightly irritant by inhalation but
ferrous sulphate it while product was still there. Caller thinks he inhaled dust clouds should seek medical help for the flu like symptoms, they appear to
and developed flu like symptoms inc cough and cold. be unrelated.
1/10/2011 14
Human Health Incidient Reports 2002
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
diuron + glyphosate Rash No details given. Safety Data Sheet suggests the product is unlikely to cause skin
irritation and caller should seek medical advice for treatment of her
rash. Advised the product wasn't likely to be the cause of the
problem
dikegulac Continual respiratory problems Caller thinks my have inhaled the product over a month ago. Had Checked Safety Data Sheet. The only hazardous ingredient is
seen her doctor on a number of occasions and had been formaldehyde at less than 1%. Explained that the product was of
prescribed a range of treatments for continual respiratory problems. low toxicity and was unlikely to cause respiratory distress.
ferrous sulphate Numbness of feet Letter from a Doctor - Medical Centre asking for a data sheet and Rang PSD for advice. Sent data sheets to doctor
any information on toxicity. Had a patient who had been exposed to
product. No details of how the product was used.
1/10/2011 15
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
2003 Professional Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
2,4-D + dicamba + triclopyr No specific symptoms were reported to the About 4 weeks prior to initial contact, the patient was spraying the product without using a face shield. The aim of the enquiry from the doctor was to rule out the possibility of exposure to OP's. The company
Company. This enquiry was made by the patient's Further details are unknown. provided the doctor with a copy of the label and medical safety data sheet. The company have had no
doctor. subsequent contact from the doctor or the patient
MCPA Patient had already made himself vomit and was not Caller, a Sister at a hospital, was treating a patient who had ingested a mouthful of the product one Advice on symptoms and regarding treatment given to caller. Suggested Poisons Centre contacted for
currently showing any signs of illness. hour previously. further advice if required. Incident closed.
aldicarb No symptoms were reported. Product applied to field treated 3 weeks ago. 2 people weeding in the field yesterday say that they Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer and confirms no further issues.
may have been contaminated with product and advice sought. No signs of symptoms as yet.
asulam Stomach pains. Man using product and had stomach pain. Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer and confirms that the symptoms are not
related to the product, no further issues.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + None stated. Farmer spraying Pastor. Spray vapour hit member of public in their garden. Environmental Health Member of public sought GP advice and inhaler prescribed. No further follow up.
triclopyr follow up.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Feeling very lethargic. Moved a knapsack full of product (60ml/10l) water and diluted product spilt down spine. No Personal Reassured unlikely to be linked. Suggested visit GP if still feeling unwell. No follow up required.
triclopyr Protective Equipment. Did not wash and feeling very lethargic. Is it linked?
clopyralid + triclopyr Sore throat and nausea. Knapsack treatment of product. Using chemical goggles and paper respiratory mask. On Tuesday Advised 'outside chance' that exposure to the product could cause irritation but that flu symptoms very
developed symptoms including sore throat and nausea. Could smell the product when applying it. unlikely. No further action required.
clopyralid + triclopyr Eyes. Skin irritated. Screwing on top of bottle & dropped bottle. Concentrated product spilt over legs & splashed onto face, Remove contaminated clothing. Wash skin with water and deterrent. Wash contaminated clothing.
wearing glasses so no product got into eyes. Skin irritated.
clopyralid + triclopyr Rash/spots on legs, becoming irritated in the heat. Spot spraying - 60ml/10l. Since then got rash/spots on legs, becoming irritated in the heat and Reassured no long term effects anticipated. As he had only taken 1 tablet urged him to continue with
spreading down legs. Visited A&E 1/6/03. Doctor gave tablets to stop irritation. Wanted to know if course. No further action required.
there would be long term effects.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Complaint of joint pain from user who visited doctor. Incident took place approx 19 May. Faxed medical safety data sheet to doctor.
clopyralid + triclopyr Sore throat for last month. Subject has had sore throat for last month. Doctor says it's a virus; she wonders if it's a side effect of Caller informed that no adverse effects anticipated by inhalation. Offered option of her doctor to call us and
the product - as wore no Personal Protective Equipment when application made. Good application request medical safety data sheet. No further follow up.
conditions.
clopyralid + triclopyr Feels sick and has headaches whenever she drives Spill of approx 0.5 lt product in rear foot-well of car. Now feels sick and has headaches whenever she Told her to remove carpets and wash with water taking care with the washing. Also should carry chemical
the car. drives the car. Rang to ask how to wash carpets and complain that the product should be better in sealed box. No further follow up proposed.
sealed. Cap was not very tight and induction seal was not sealed.
clopyralid + triclopyr Has got a rash on legs. Sprayed product, knapsack application on 20.7.03. Has got a rash on legs. First appeared 24.7.03, Said that because of the delay, possibly not the product, but advised him to see his GP. Caller said he
could it be the product?. He was using Personal Protective Equipment. would see his GP 25.7.03. I offered medical safety data sheet if doctor wanted it.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Farmer sprayed the product around garden to control brambles. 9 yr old daughter ate a blackberry - Advised to keep an eye on her. Visit A&E if concerned. Advised could send medical safety data sheet if
sprayed with the product. Didn't taste nice but didn't spit it out. necessary. Called 1.9.03 daughter okay - no reaction.
clopyralid + triclopyr Blistering of his skin around neck and wrists. Subject is in dispute with the people who spray a church yard in which he used a strimmer. He claims Suggest he discusses his symptoms with his GP who could talk to our doctor. No follow up required.
that plant material sprayed with a herbicide (does not know but suspects it was the product) has
caused blistering of his skin around neck and wrists. He seems to be fishing for evidence that the
product could have caused this and wants to use this in evidence against the people spraying the
church yard in a court case.
dichlobenil Blistering inside and outside bridge of nose. Inhaled dust while filling granule applicator. No details given
dichlobenil Irritation to forehead Irritation to forehead after use. Wearing overalls and face shield. Irritation reported to be nearly gone the following day.
epoxiconazole Child had developed an eye irritation Caller rang and said that about one week ago the neighbouring farmer had sprayed a field adjacent to None
their garden at time her child was playing in garden. Information on product supplied to caller. At later
date, child seen by GP who requested and was provided with product Safety Data Sheet. Incident
closed.
1/10/2011 16
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
flufenacet + pendimethalin The workers had stinging eyes and a sense of Caller from HSE was investigating case of two motorway workers who had been covered in spray drift, None
irritation on exposed skin. caller wanted to check their statement that spray drift was yellow. Confirmed likely that could see a
yellow colour being sprayed as product contains pendimethalin (yellow). Also confirmed the
concentrated product is irritating to skin, but not to eyes. Incident closed. The workers visited hospital
and had undergone full decontamination and their clothing had been burnt.
flufenacet + pendimethalin Tingling of skin (face), blistering (lesions) on head, Caller had been contaminated by spray drift in his garden. Company medical adviser contacted caller Company rang caller on 13/11/03 after visit to GP. Incident closed.
swelling at base of neck. on 12/11/03 and provided advice. Product Safety Data Sheet faxed to caller for him to take to his GP
on 13/11/03.
flurtamone + diflufenican 2-3 days later, he is complaining of a 'tingling' A pipe burst on the sprayer when operator was applying 2 products. Contacted Approval Holder of 2nd product. Safety data sheet faxed. Take to doctor with label if
sensation on his skin. His overalls were not appropriate.
immediately removed.
glyphosate Skin darkened on knuckles. Spilt dilute pesticide, but was wearing gloves. Company retained doctor spoke to caller. He had been strimming weeds for two days. Discussed
possibility of reaction to weed foliage. Satisfied not related to product.
glyphosate Hay fever symptoms. None specifically. Wanted details of possible effects of spraying with Roundup as he suffered from Typical medical safety data sheet given. Offered contact with company retainer doctor if his own doctor
allergy-type symptoms. requested it. Did not come back.
glyphosate Has been sick twice, then diarrhoea. Spilt diluted product on his sandwiches and still ate them. Company retained doctor contacted caller immediately. The symptoms had disappeared the following day.
glyphosate Caller claims to react to minute quantities of Local council have been spraying the streets. No direct incident can be traced, but caller suffers from This lady rings regularly at least once a year. Company retained doctor spoke to her.
numerous household and industrial chemicals, with a Multiple Chemical Sensitisation Syndrome.
large range of symptoms resulting from a damaged
immune system.
glyphosate Soreness and blisters. Back-pack sprayer had leaked down back and neck. Washed off Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre, who advised a visit GP, even though adverse effects
not expected. Caller had tried but his GP refused to see him and told him to visit Casualty Dept. Patient
refused because he did not want to wait aroun
glyphosate Tingling sensation. User had accidentally sprayed diluted spray into her mouth and washed it out immediately. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre and advised from medical safety data sheet product of
low toxicity but visit GP if worried and get him to contact National Chemical Emergency Centre or National
Poisons Information Service.
glyphosate None. Farmer had accident with spray equipment and has been in contact with dilute product. Faxed medical safety data sheet for doctor to see. Advised wash thoroughly etc.
glyphosate Alkaline burn. Girl injured sliding over white line on football pitch. Reassurance given that traces of product on a white line would not cause any injury.
glyphosate Burning sensation on cheek, discomfort. Accidental exposure to eyes and cheek. Company retained doctor spoke to him on the phone.
glyphosate Headache followed by feeling nauseous and May have breathed in 'fumes' whilst spraying product. National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised from medical safety data sheet that product is
subsequently some tightness of the chest. not volatile and unlikely to have any adverse effect, but advised to see GP anyway.
glyphosate Stomach problems. A spray contractor received a solicitor's letter alleging a child had been in contact with product when Through the contractor, the Approval Holder sent a letter with all details of product safety and good
contractors sprayed on other side of concrete wall. practice. The solicitor was satisfied there was no case to answer and dropped all the allegations.
glyphosate Had not been feeling well recently. Spilt product on skin and overalls whilst applying product 2 weeks ago. Washed off immediately. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Information from medical safety data sheet given,
caller reassured product of low toxicity and unlikely to cause any symptoms.
glyphosate Had been unwell, doctor was testing for heart Sprayer leaked on to his back whilst spraying. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre who advised from medical safety data sheet that low
complaints. toxicity of product unlikely to be connected with symptoms. Caller was reassured.
glyphosate Limbs ached, felt shaky. Council worker using tank mix of glyphosate and diuron. Suggested product unlikely to cause symptoms described and sent fact sheets on glyphosate. Put in
contact with medical doctor working as consultant for Approval Holder, who was satisfied there was no
connection with symptoms and the product.
glyphosate Stomach ache. Sprayed yesterday and might have inhaled some spray. National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised from medical safety data sheet product of low
toxicity, inhalation would not be expected to cause any symptoms. Seek further GP help if symptoms
continue.
glyphosate Sickness. Not specific. Reported by a distributor who was visiting the operator concerned. She wondered if she Information on the product was given to reassure the operator about the safety of the product. The
could have been exposed to any drift whilst applying the product, and if there was a connection with operator was satisfied her sickness was not related to exposure to the product.
her feeling sick.
glyphosate Child had a rash around his mouth. Was not feeling Area sprayed two days ago. Callers 4 yr old son played in the area today. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Child's father reassured from medical safety data
unwell. sheet that product unlikely to be connected with rash. If symptoms persisted, advised to go to GP.
1/10/2011 17
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Cough and Lethargy Lady was spraying 200ml product in 10 l water in knapsack sprayer wearing appropriate PPE and Caller was sent a copy of the Health and Safety Data Sheet and advised to contact their GP. Syngenta
facemask believes symptoms unlikely to be connected to pesticide use.
glyphosate Death. Suspected suicide reported by a hospital. They were checking all substances which might have been Approval Holder provided all details of the product and analytical methods of detection in the body. The
consumed by the suicide victim. hospital concerned was satisfied that product was NOT the cause of death
imidacloprid Suffering with bowel problems over the last 6 Caller has been suffering with bowel problems over the last 6 months. She is concerned that she has National Chemical Emergency Centre advised that unlikely to be cause of her problems. Caller stated she
months. grown tomatoes in the compost, which stated on the label it should not be used for food crops. is under a consultant, so would continue to see him.
imidacloprid + beta- After a short while he was sick. A man who was using the product then ate his sandwiches. He obtained medical treatment. Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer and
cyfluthrin confirms that symptoms unrelated to product, but offers to advise GP if required. No call received. Incident
closed.
iodosulfuron + No symptoms were reported. Male employee of her company 40 yrs of age contaminated by the product plus biopower. medical safety data sheet faxed. Call closed by handler who replied at 11.10.
mesosulfuron-methyl
methyl bromide No symptoms were reported. Since the fumigation A methyl bromide bubble fumigation had been correctly conducted in a garage. The garage had been Our staff revisited the site and conducted a leak test of the bubble. This test demonstrated that there were
was carried out in a bubble, which is leak tested, no correctly sealed and warning signs been placed at all entry points. However, a friend of the owner had no leaks, therefore no exposure could have occurred.
exposure would have occurred simply by entering entered the garage for a short period of time, ignoring the warning signs.
the garage where the bubble was situated.
paraquat None Knapsack sprayer had leaked onto his back and buttocks when carrying out a spray operation Gentleman was asked if there was any other contamination e.g. eyes or mouth. None reported. Advised to
dispose of or wash clothing and if he should susequently feel unwell to contact his GP. Followed up again
on 21st March 2003 and still no symptoms and
paraquat None Spilled product on hands and was worried about green stain left after washing them. Gentleman advised to wear gloves when working with chemicals
pirimiphos methyl Funny taste, tender/sore chest, upset stomach Gentleman had inhaled spray Advised to contact GP. Was told that the symptoms he was describing were similar to those that would be
expected from this type of product. GP contacted Emergency Help Line and asked for the Material Safety
Data Sheet to be read out to him. Did not wan
pirimiphos methyl Nausea, sweating, dizziness, trembling Contamination had occurred when gentleman removed a hoover from a grain store treated with the Advised to contact GP. Was told that the symptoms he was describing were similar to those that would be
product and then had a cigarette before washing his hands. expected from the product. Followed up the following day and the gentleman had seen his GP and was
feeling better.
tebuconazole No symptoms were reported. A man has eaten 6 carrots from a field sprayed with tebuconazole and another product. He is 76 and Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer and confirms no further issues.
a diabetic and feeling unwell.
triclopyr A doctor called. He has a patient who has ingested 250ml of the product. Wanted to know the effects Approval Holder's doctor agreed to call patients Doctor to discuss his patient.
on human health.
trifluralin Contractor applying trifluralin + flufenacet + pendimethalin to field adjacent to offices. Drift has blown Requested medical safety data sheet and details of solvent in the product (solvesso 100). Offered further
into offices and onto apple trees in grounds. assistance if required.
trifluralin Operator was measuring out the product when he got a few spots on his face and one drop in his Advised that there was unlikely to be a problem due to low toxicity. If concerned should visit GP. No
mouth. Washed mouth and skin straight away. further follow up required.
2003 Amateur Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
2,4-D + mecoprop-P + Internal irritation (indigestion). Customer ate a lettuce that may have been accidentally sprayed with the product and later None.
dicamba experienced internal irritation for several hours (No herbicide symptoms evident on lettuce).
1-naphthylacetic acid None. Parent using product for approved purpose. Child may have touched treated cutting and possibly put None.
fingers in mouth.
aluminium ammonium Skin inflammation on hands, wrists and feet. Subject called to say she had used the product on two occasions, two and 6 months previously Information sent as requested.
sulphate respectively and had noticed skin inflammation 4 - 5 days after use. Asked for information. Safety
data sheet sent to her doctor.
bifenthrin Rash to arms and upper chest. Symptoms may have been unrelated to the use. The subject was out on a warm day not wearing a None.
shirt at the time but did not think he was exposed to any drift during the course of the spraying.
Subject was concerned that the symptoms may have been related and if so what action was needed.
The subject confirmed he had also been strimming without his shirt on.
1/10/2011 18
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
bifenthrin Felt ill with stomach cramps. Subject sprayed cucumbers. Next day felt ill. None.
bifenthrin Hand red and appeared to be burning. Liquid spilt on hand. None.
bifenthrin Skin irritation. Subject cleaned up leak of product from bag after which skin became irritated. Doctor prescription given but not explained.
bifenthrin None. Spraying and got some in eyes. Subject washed with water. No irritation developed as yet. Wanted Information sent as requested.
further information if treatment necessary.
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + Skin irritation Dermatitis. Member of staff at Makro had spilled product whilst handling. Unknown whether washed off Information sent as requested.
mecoprop-P afterwards. Developed dermatitis later and went off sick 14 September. Store HR officer asking for
information. Safety data sheet sent.
glufosinate ammonium + Skin irritation. Child of 20 months sprayed her skin - possibly eyes. Parent advised to wash child with plenty of fresh water.
fatty acids
glyphosate Slightly nauseous in night following. Spilt some on hand whilst mixing washed off immediately. Requested advice.
imidacloprid Thought she felt some tingling on hand after washing Whilst in a shop, subject handled product which leaked onto hand. None.
and enquired whether product could have reaction to
beta-blocker tablets she was taking.
imidacloprid White blisters on skin. Subject had noticed white blisters a few days after spraying. None.
mecoprop-P + dicamba Patient ill in hospital, jaundiced, liver problems, Parent concerned that her daughter's boyfriend had used the product on her. Active ingredient information given to caller and asked that hospital call company.
considered potential poisoning.
metaldehyde None. Parent reported that 19 month old child had put pellets in mouth, may have swallowed 2 or 3. Parent None.
asking for reassurance.
metaldehyde None. Subject accidentally took pellets into mouth when he put the bit of a watering system in it which None.
contained some old pellets. Asking for reassurance.
metaldehyde None. Adult subject swallowed a pellet, wanted reassurance regarding safety. None.
metaldehyde None. Mother feared ingestion by child 18 months who had handled pellets. None.
metaldehyde None. Child eating soil in garden may have eaten few pellets. None.
metaldehyde None. Parent found 3 year old child with spilt container - pellets scattered. Child 'may' have eaten some - not None.
known. Asking advice on safety.
myclobutanil + bifenthrin Eyelids swollen and face Whilst spraying plants some drift settled on skin on face. None.
myclobutanil + rape oil Rash on skin. Whilst spraying plants some drift contaminated skin. Subject's doctor contacted company asking about safety of product. Safety data sheet sent.
fatty acids Complained of some stinging to her eyes. Parent Child sprayed in face by another child whilst playing in greenhouse None.
rinsed for 5 minutes.
fatty acids Eyes sore and felt swollen but better next morning. Subject was spraying and got into eyes. None.
fatty acids Anaphylactic reaction possibly from handling Child handled container/packaging while mother unpacking shopping. Was being treated by doctor for reaction generally. No link to product established.
container.
glyphosate Now her whole hand and arm up to the elbow are She sprayed some of this product 2 weeks ago and got some on her finger. Her fingers had some cuts Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre, advised from medical safety data sheet that
badly affected by swelling and a bad skin problem. in. symptoms unlikely to be caused by product. Suggested go back to GP if symptoms persist.
glyphosate Numbness on side of face. Splashed onto hand and rubbed face before washing off. National Chemical Emergency Centre advised from medical safety data sheet that symptoms unlikely, but if
a rash develops to go to GP and contact them again.
glyphosate Redness of skin, eye irritation, temporary loss of Husband accidentally sprayed wife in eye and down one side of body. National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised from medical safety data sheet that product
sight, voice husky. likely to have similar effects to a detergent, but to seek medical advice for symptoms.
glyphosate Irritation and discomfort in arm. Product spilt on hand after gust of wind and not washed off for 15 minutes. On 22nd July, caller had written to Scotts for advice following spill and been advised to see GP if
concerned about symptoms. Telephone call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre on 25th July,
he was advised the product was of low toxicity and unli
glyphosate Lips were slightly swollen. Skin has a slight burning She was exposed to some drifting spray which entered her mouth and touched her face. Not washed Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advised from medical safety data sheet product
sensation. off for 1 1/2 hrs. unlikely to cause anything but transient skin irritation.
glyphosate Some blisters on his forearm and one on his leg. Caller used the product during the weekend. No exposure noted. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre, who advised from medical safety data sheet, low
toxicity of product unlikely to be cause of blisters. Could be allergic to a plant in the garden. Advised to
visit GP.
1/10/2011 19
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + None at time of call. Interior house wall sprayed with water (during pointing) from sprayer that previously contained the Call referred to Approval holder‟s medical team.
MCPA product. Caller concerned as she is allergic to pesticides, and wanted to discuss how to remove any
residue from wall.
diquat None at time of call. Caller‟s young child may have put the product sprayer into mouth. Caller had got the child to rinse Advised that significant quantities would need to be ingested to cause problems, however, if he was
mouth. concerned, the child could be taken for medical attention together with the container.
tar oil Caller‟s spouse had been using the product for some time and has been diagnosed as having 2 spots Safety data sheet faxed directly to caller‟s physician.
on his lungs. Caller wanted to know what was in product.
tar oil Sore throat, cough, shortness of breath. Caller had inhaled some of the spray when applying product. GP already treating caller for asthma. Caller advised to return to GP, and tell him of the incident (he had
not mentioned it on his previous visit to the doctor). Doctor could contact National Chemical Emergency
Centre or the Approval holder for further
metaldehyde Had suffered diarrhoea after initial incident, felt ill Incident occurred 4 weeks previously, caller had already seen his GP. Some of the product had been Symptoms were in keeping with ingestion of large quantity of the product. Advised to return to GP, who
again and wondered if this bout is likely to be related. spilt, some went into caller‟s mug of tea, which he drank, only discovering this when he found the could contact National Poisons Information Service or the Approval holder for safety data sheet if required.
residue of the pellets at the bottom of his mug.
paraquat + diquat + Eye irritation Shop calling, a customer had bought the product and some dusters, and taken them home in a bag Customer has GP appointment. Shop advised that unlikely the product box is source of irritation, especially
simazine + amitrole together. The customer has subsequently used dusters at home, rubbed her eye, and is now as the dusters were in their own separate wrapper. Most likely that the customer has some form of
suggesting that the intact product box was dusty, and the residue box could be the cause of her eye mechanical irritation of the eye. Shop advised
irritation. She had not rinsed her eye after the incident.
diquat The child has been sick once, but was now feeling Caller‟s 5 year old some got small amount of product on his finger, which he then put in his mouth. Advised to get child medically checked as a precaution, either by GP or local Casualty dept.
better.
diquat No symptoms. Caller may have inhaled some spray when using the product 2 days ago. She had not been Advised that the product did not contain paraquat, and was unlikely to cause any ill effects through normal
concerned, but her mother said the product contained paraquat and could cause harm. use.
diquat Small blister on hand. Caller had splashed his hand with product, washed his hands but wanted further advice. Product not classified as irritant. Caller advised to keep an eye on blister, if it gets worse, or doesn‟t settle
to consult his GP.
pyrethrins Rash and blisters to face and arm. Caller had used product 3 days previously and now suffering allergy rash. Co-incidentally a viral No similar problems reported with the product. Unable to confirm cause of her reaction from information
infection was circulating at her place of work, which cause similar symptoms, callers wondered which available.
was the cause of her complaint.
bifenthrin Slight burning in nose and mouth. Caller had inhaled some of the spray when treating plants. Unlikely the caller had inhaled sufficient to cause long-term problem advised to rinse nose and mouth, but if
he feels ill in any way, or the symptoms do not disappear in short time, to seek medical attention, taking
box with him.
2,4-D + mecoprop-P Swollen shin with rash Caller used product 3 days ago doesn‟t think he splashed any on his leg but has swollen shin with The product safety data sheet indicated caller‟s symptoms were unlikely if used properly. Reassured him
rash. Has been to GP, who was treating as a reaction to some type of insect bite. that he was taking right course of action by going to GP, and to continue with treatment
MCPA + mecoprop-P Felt sick, had a nose bleed. Applied product last week and watered in. Mown lawn today, and caller inhaled some of the dust that Checked safety data sheet, product mainly fertiliser, low hazard. Advised symptoms unlikely to have come
arose. from product. Advised to drink some water, and wash with soap/water. Shouldn‟t be lasting effects.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Child had high temperature. Ambulance called. Previous day caller had double dosed lawn, then not watered in. His young son had been rolling on Paramedic arrived. National Chemical Emergency Centre told paramedics about the product. They
ferrous sulphate the lawn. thanked and dealt with child.
diquat Developed rash on hand the day after using product. Caller used product wearing old cycling gloves. Advised product was not classified as skin irritant, although he did appear to have allergic rash. Advised to
visit GP (& wash gloves before use).
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Feet above the ankle had come up in a rash – not on 11 yr old walked on lawn with bare feet after it had been treated. Caller wanted to know if the product Explained the product is of low toxicity, suggested boy sees doctor as rash could have been caused by
ferrous sulphate the sole of lower part of the foot. toxic. many different things.
glyphosate Ankles and fingers are swollen. Caller sprayed area yesterday, wearing gloves and open sandals. Advised substance is not very irritant. Advised to seek medical attention, and take container with her. The
GP could call National Chemical Emergency Centre for safety data sheet/further information if required.
bifenthrin Diarrhoea and some dizziness. Caller being treated by GP for a cough. Thinks he may have taken a dose of the product instead of his Advised that although product is of low toxicity he should seek medical attention, taking the container.
cough medicine last night. Caller was more concerned about the dizziness than diarrhoea, because of driving.
diquat No symptoms. Caller had used product, then eaten packet of crisps, could taste the product on her fingers. Advised if she developed symptoms to see her GP, the doctor could call for safety data sheet/further
information.
glyphosate No symptoms. Caller had sprayed a „high‟ plant and thinks some spray may have landed in her hair, and was Caller confirmed that she washed her hair immediately. Advised that such small amount was unlikely to be
concerned that her hair would fall out. problem, hair shouldn‟t drop out.
1/10/2011 20
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller‟s granddaughter had picked up granule of product and put her tongue on it, though unlikely she Caller advised that product of low toxicity, however, should child show symptoms or appear unwell to visit
ferrous sulphate ingested any. The product was applied 2-3 days previously. GP, and take packet with them.
glyphosate Skin now inflamed. Three days ago, caller had sprayed brambles with product, and also scratched arm on brambles. Advised product very slight irritant but would be unlikely to cause reaction 3 days after application, advised
Caller confirmed she had washed arms after the incident. to go to GP.
metaldehyde No symptoms. Caller‟s young son put „one pellet‟ in mouth 6 hours earlier. Had washed out his mouth, but having Advised as he was only exposed to very small amount, is extremely unlikely he would be harmed.
read warnings on packets was concerned. However, should child become poorly in any way, he should be taken to casualty immediately with the
pack.
paraquat + diquat + No symptoms. Caller sprayed some product on his hands 10 days previously, had washed it off immediately, but Advised that since he washed his hands immediately after contact, and has not suffered any skin irritation,
simazine + amitrole having seen effect on weeds, is concerned he may have a problem. it was unlikely he would be affected in any other way.
dikegulac-sodium Stomach discomfort. Caller sprayed his hedge sometime previously, and since has had a lot of stomach discomfort. He has Explained that the product is of low toxicity, and is unlikely to be the cause of his problems. He needs to
had a scan but showed no problems. He thinks the product was responsible. seek medical advice for treatment, we would send a copy of the product safety data sheet to his GP if
requested.
heptenophos + permethrin „Aching‟ eyes. About 4-5 days ago, caller used product, some of the spray blew back into his face. Advised that the product may cause eye irritation, advised to seek medical attention. Caller stated that he
would rinse his eyes again.
bifenthrin + flutriafol Sore throat. Caller had inhaled some spray while applying. She wondered if it was dangerous. Explained the product is of low toxicity and concentration of actives was low, so should not be any serious
or lasting effects. However, caller advised if her symptoms do not improve, or if she is worried to visit her
GP, taking the packet with her.
glyphosate No symptoms. Caller was injecting the product into the stems of knapweed, when she pricked her finger with the Advised that the product is not poisonous, and it is unlikely she will suffer any ill effects. However, should
syringe, she doesn‟t think any substance was injected, though the skin was broken. any symptoms develop she should seek medical attention.
diquat Felt unwell. 2 days previously the caller had poured product into a mug (as the nozzle was not working properly) Caller was already undergoing treatment from GP/hospital. The approval Holder was notified of the call
then drunk from the mug. 12 hours later she felt unwell and went to her GP, who sent her to hospital and asked to contact the caller regarding her issue with the label.
as an emergency, caller is now waiting for test results. She is concerned about long-term damage and
feels that the container is not properly labelled.
2,4-D + dicamba Face is red and skin peeling. Call from doctor treating man who 3 weeks ago, sprayed his face with the product. Copy of safety data sheet sent through.
bifenthrin + flutriafol Already suffers with dermatitis, hands worse than Caller had sprayed plants day before. Already suffers with dermatitis, but did not wear gloves when Advised that product is not usually a skin irritant, however as she already had dermatitis, slight possibility
usual. spraying, hands are worse than usual, could product be responsible? that product has had an effect. Advised to seek medical attention if condition does not improve, telling GP
of what she has been exposed to.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Child is feeling unwell. Caller‟s toddler had been crawling on a lawn, which had been treated some days earlier. Advised that the product is of very low toxicity, and unlikely to be absorbed through skin. Child would have
ferrous sulphate had to eaten a large amount to show effects. However, if she was concerned she should seek medical
advice.
glyphosate trimesium + Swollen, itchy hand. Yesterday, the caller had been spraying product in garden and scratched her hand on a bush. Advised that the small amount she had been exposed to should not cause serious harm. It sounded like
diuron she had reacted to something and she should visit her GP, taking the product with her.
diquat Rash has developed. Caller used product a week ago, and splashed some on his leg, although it was washed off Advised that the product is not considered a skin irritant, and advised to seek medical advice.
immediately.
penconazole Thumb is turning black and blue and area affected Caller had sprayed product without wearing gloves. She had also pierced her thumb with a thorn. Advised product is not an irritant to skin, and she should obtain further medical attention.
seemed to be spreading. Caller had already received medical attention, trying to rule out product as cause of problem.
bupirimate + pirimicarb + Felt unwell, vomiting. Day after using caller felt unwell, and worse the day after that. She thinks the might be sensitive to the Advised that the product should not have had such an effect, advised to see her GP, and National
triforine product as she has been ill after using it before. Chemical Emergency Centre would supply the GP with an safety data sheet if required.
paraquat + diquat + No symptoms. Caller had got a small amount of mixed product on his face. Advised that given the low level of exposure unlikely to cause problem, but if symptoms develop to seek
simazine + amitrole medical advice and inform the GP of what he had been exposed to.
bifenthrin + flutriafol No symptoms. Caller‟s 3-year-old sprayed the product around the room. Child has been cleaned up thoroughly. Advised product is non-irritant to skin, not harmful by ingestion, though minimally irritant to eyes.
paraquat + diquat No symptoms. Caller had been up a ladder trying to reach a balcony when he spilt contents of 2-gallon watering can Advised that at the recommended dose, he should be all right, the product would only be dangerous if he
containing the product over himself, head and body. He had showered 1½ hours after the incident, but had swallowed it. However, if any itchiness or other irritation develops he should see his GP.
was concerned.
bifenthrin + flutriafol No symptoms. Caller had eaten 2 aubergines treated with the product, was concerned about long term health effects, Reassured that was very unlikely to be harmed by the small amount involved, especially as the aubergines
especially would she develop cancer. had been washed before consumption. Explained that a single low dose would not be expected to give
rise to cancer.
malathion Felt unwell, stomach pain. Caller may have inhaled some spray when using the product several days before. Advised due to the severity of his symptoms he should consult his GP as soon as possible and take the
bottle with him.
1/10/2011 21
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
bifenthrin Sore throat and dizziness. Caller inhaled some spray. Had already seen GP, who suggested that the product may be to blame. Advised if symptoms persist she should return to her GP for further treatment.
bifenthrin Developed a skin reaction 48 hours later. Caller may have had some spray blown into her face. Caller stated she had also been potting plants Advised that the product is not classified as irritant or sensitiser, would not expect the skin reaction the
that may be toxic. Caller went to pharmacist, who diagnosed chemical burns. caller had described. Advised her to consult a GP.
diquat Chest pains and tingling down the arm. Caller‟s friend had been spraying product couple of days previously, breathed some of the spray, and Advised that the product is unlikely to cause harmful effects under normal conditions of handling/use. But
got some on her skin. given the symptoms, advised to seek immediate medical attention, taking the pack.
fatty acids + sulphur No symptoms. Caller‟s colleague was accidentally sprayed in face with product. Washed face straight away. Advised product is of very low toxicity, adverse effects are very unlikely.
metaldehyde No symptoms. Caller from Casualty. Doctor treating an 18-month child who had ingested 2 pellets approx 1-2 hours Provided doctor with information to calculate how much metaldehyde had been ingested, and determine
ago. suitable treatment. As no symptoms, doctor said child may be sent home. National Chemical Emergency
Centre explained that symptoms can be delayed, child
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Eye irritation. Caller‟s husband had got some product in eye, had flushed it with water. Advised that had taken correct action, suggested that if irritation persist to see his GP.
ferrous sulphate
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Swollen knee. Caller had been using product day before, believes that some entered wound in his knee. Area had Advised to seek medical advice for treatment of the wound, and take the product pack with him.
ferrous sulphate been washed.
glyphosate + trimesium Slight red mark. Caller splashed small amount of diluted product in his face, washed on within 20 minutes. Advised the product is not classified as irritant, therefore unlikely to have lasting effect. However, if
redness does not disappear, caller should seek medical advice, taking product.
metaldehyde No symptoms known. Practice Nurse requesting further information about the product as child who may have ingested Safety data sheet faxed through to doctors surgery as requested.
product was en-route to surgery.
paraquat + diquat Eye irritation. Caller‟s colleague has sprayed some product into eyes. Affected person had flushed eyes with clean Safety data sheet faxed as requested.
water, but irritation was persisting and casualty was going to hospital.
paraquat + diquat + Burning sensation in her mouth. Caller‟s partner had got some diluted product on her hand, then licked it off. Advised to rinse her mouth thoroughly and wash hands. If irritation persists she should be taken for
simazine + amitrole medical advice.
diquat No symptoms. Caller had accidentally got some spray in her face couple of days previously. She had washed her skin Advised that the product is not classified as irritant to skin or eyes. Unlikely to be any long term hazards.
and eye but was concerned how hazardous the product was.
diquat Eyelids inflamed. Caller had got some product spray in eyes and face couple of days previously. She had washed her Advised that was unlikely to have done permanent damage, and she should follow GP‟s advice. If did not
face immediately. Caller had already seen GP, who had prescribed a cream, but she was concerned improve to visit GP again, and he could call National Chemical Emergency Centre for further advice if
she had done permanent damage to her eyes. required.
diquat Skin irritation, which returned once creams Caller had spilt product on his arm several weeks ago, and was still suffering symptoms. Caller wanted Explained the concentration of diquat in product was very low, and there was not antidote. Advised he
prescribed by GP completed. information on diquat, and antidote. revisit his doctor if symptoms had returned.
bifenthrin Dizziness, visual disturbances and swelling of Caller had experienced dizziness, visual disturbances and swelling of tongue after using product last Safety data sheet indicates inhalation or skin contact unlikely to cause irritation or harmful effects. Given
tongue. week. She had received medical attention and was also receiving ongoing treatment from neurologist the callers medical history, advised to return to her GP, and National Chemical Emergency Centre will
for other health issues. provide the GP with additional information
bifenthrin + flutriafol Swollen finger, it had cut. Caller was GP treating patient for swollen finger, after product contacted cut on finger. Advised of active ingredient. The product is non-irritant to skin, though active may cause skin sensations
such as tingling, which should subside within 12 hours. Treatment is symptomatic and supportive care.
diquat Only symptom slight redness of skin. Chemist requesting information for customer who had sprayed product on her cheek. Had washed her Explained the product was not classed as an irritant. Safety data sheet recommends splashes are washed
face thoroughly and not got any into eyes. off straight away. Unlikely to cause further problems but if symptoms occur she should seek medical
advice.
ferrous sulphate No symptoms. Caller‟s 2-year-old daughter had put hands in bag of product, then in her mouth, but caller did not think Advised that product was not classified as hazardous, but to monitor child‟s behaviour and seek medical
any had been ingested. Had already washed out child‟s mouth and washed her hands. attention if the event of anything unusual.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s nephew had sprayed product into mouth of son. Child had spat it out, washed his mouth out Advised that had taken correct course of action, it was unlikely that the boy had enough to affect him,
and drunk water. Not really swallowed any. however to keep him under observation and take him, and the bottle to the doctor if he shows signs of
being ill.
diquat Unknown. Call from hospital casualty. Elderly man had been taken in, having drunk half litre of the product. Supplied safety data sheet, and put into contact with the relevant help line. Follow up call, confirmed that
Hospital recognised active to be diquat and requested further toxicological information. they had necessary information and were happy to deal with the incident.
diquat Unknown. NHS Direct contacted National Chemical Emergency Centre after call from parent of child who put In view of uncertainty over product name, and ingestion advised to err on side of caution, recommended
trigger spray in mouth, though unknown if any product ingested. child taken to local A&E department, with product if possible.
glyphosate No symptoms. Caller had accidentally drunk ½ cup of very diluted product. She had rinsed her mouth, and drunk Advised that product had low toxicity, should not suffer any adverse effects
water to help dilute it.
1/10/2011 22
Human Health Incidient Reports 2003
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
captan + 1-naphthylatic No symptoms. Three days previously, caller had knocked over box of product, causing dust cloud that may have been Advised that due to short exposure time, and the fact it happened some time ago as had not yet had any
acid inhaled. Caller was concerned about effects inhalation may have. effects, would unlikely to do so now.
triclopyr + fluroxypyr Breathing difficulties, coughing up blood, dizzy, faint. Caller spot sprayed the product 2 weeks previous (no Personal Protective Equipment). Since then Encouraged to visit local A&E. Reassured unlikely to be linked to the product. Called at 3pm. Patient in
He suffers from farmer's lung. suffered breathing difficulties, coughing up blood, dizzy, faint. He suffers from farmer's lung. hospital. Okay - not pesticide related. No further follow up required.
imidacloprid No symptoms were reported. Product spilt over person's back. Closed on the basis that Company doctor has contacted enquirer and confirms no further issues.
paraquat Fatality Request from the Forensic Laboratory for blood and tissue analysis from suspected death by Weedol. Not none
paraquat Unknown. Doctor called requesting a Health and Safety Data Sheet regarding a patient who had come in with No information received due to patient confidentiality.
affects of product on his back. Patient fully recovered but Doctor wanted HSDS.
paraquat Unknown - request for information came from a Hospital Doctor requested a Health and Safety Data Sheet for suspected paraquat ingestion. Company offered
medical expertise this was not required. No further information divulged by caller due to patient
confidentiality.
1/10/2011 23
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
2004 Professional Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
alpha-cypermetherin Muscle spasms. Subject used the product for one month during the course of their Re-contacted 17-Jan-2005. Subject had had another occurrence
job (Forestry Application). Subject was using the product according over the Christmas period, this could not be attributed to an
to the label and was wearing the appropriate Personal Protective immediate spraying incidence.
Equipment. Subject visited GP and hospital complaining of muscle
spasms. GP wrote a sick note stating OP poisoning. [It was
recommended from our perspective that a blood sample was taken
to confirm this as alpha-cypermetherin is not an OP]. Subject
reported to have adverse effects on nerves and was unable to
stand properly. Was off work from 12th July to 20th August.
alpha-cypermetherin Reddening and numbing of the face. Subject is a forestry spray contractor who was exposed during the Established that this was a known effect of this class of chemistry
course of his job. Contractor was wearing all appropriate Personal and does not indicate systemic poisoning.
Protective Equipment and applying according to the label.
Approximately 3 hours after spraying, subject experienced
reddening and numbing of the face. Symptoms disappeared about
3 hours after the subject had finished spraying.
alpha-cypermetherin Reddening and numbing of the face. Three subjects who are forestry spray contractors who were Established that this was a known effect of this class of chemistry
exposed during the course of their job. Contractors were wearing and does not indicate systemic poisoning.
all appropriate Personal Protective Equipment and applying
according to the label. Approximately 3 hours after spraying
subjects experienced reddening and numbing of the face.
Symptoms primarily located in area of Face-mask. Symptoms
disappeared that evening after the subject had finished spraying.
alpha-cypermetherin Reddening and numbing of the face. Subject exposed during the course of their job as a forestry Established that this was a known effect of this class of chemistry
contractor. Subject was using the product according to the label and does not indicate systemic poisoning.
and was wearing the appropriate Personal Protective Equipment.
During spraying subject experienced reddening and numbing of the
face.
1/10/2011 24
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
aluminium phosphide It was reported that they had difficulty in A member of staff at a horse sanctuary placed some tablets in a rat The horse sanctuary had already reported the incident to the HSE.
breathing and feeling "unwell". Of the burrow inside a barn. Three members of staff at a horse sanctuary We were satisfied, after checking, that the product had been
three members of staff treated in hospital, were asked by their manager to enter the barn where the treatment correctly purchased. HSE inspectors contacted us on several
two were discharged later the same day, had been carried out earlier that morning. They spent some time in occasions about this incident and we responded to enquiries.
the third the following evening. We have the building conducting their work before feeling unwell. They were
not been made aware of the treatment immediately taken to hospital together with a copy of the safety
given, i data sheet for the product. An HSE inspector indicated that two
members of staff would be likely to experience "medical problems"
for the rest of their lives. We have not been made aware of the
details.
aluminium phosphide No symptoms were reported. A private householder had acquired a flask of the product following We arranged for a member of our staff (trained in the use of
some mole control in his back garden. He decided to use two aluminium phosphide) to visit and remove the product.
tablets in a rat hole under his wall cavity. The house had started to
smell, so he had evacuated the house and opened all the windows
for ventilation. He appreciated that he should not have been left
the product.
asulam Skin irritation on his legs. A man who recently walked in bracken that had been treated with GP treated him with skin cream. Cause of irritation would be by the
Asulox. He now has skin irritation on his legs which was causing bracken itself. His consultant later confirmed capilaritis and
him great discomfort. He had been to his GP who had treated him unrelated to the product. Incident closed.
with skin cream but wanted further advice from the company.
benazolin + 2, 4-D + MCPA Burning sensation in mouth. Lady phoned about her father who is complaining he had a burning Advised the gentleman to go to his nearest A&E hospital where
sensation in his mouth after using the product earlier this afternoon they will probably wash his mouth out. Company doctor offered to
[14/9/03]. advise A&E consultant if required. No contact was made by them.
Incident closed.
benazolin + clopyralid No symptoms were reported. The call was made on behalf of a doctor who was treating a patient The medical safety data sheet for the product was sent by fax to Dr
whom had been sprayed in the face with the product. Berry as requested. Company doctor was called and alerted to the
incident. All details were passed on to him who then said the
incident had been dealt with and could now be closed off.
1/10/2011 25
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
chlorothalonil Tingling all over his body Gentleman called to say that he had been using chlorothalonil 2 Company doctor followed up to check gentleman was now okay as
weeks ago and now felt very unwell. As gentleman was 81 he was it was clear he was very concerned for his health. Company Doctor
advised to call an ambulance. Paramedic called to say that patient left contact details should the gentleman require him to speak to his
had already been to see his GP twice who had diagnosed Flu-like GP.
symptoms. The Health and Safety Data Sheet was faxed to Old
Church A+E, however Mr Baker now seemed fine.
chlorpyrifos 9 month old girl found by parents lying on floor. Plant pot over face Forwarded medical safety data sheet after speaking to a doctor
and compost spilled over child and floor. Child appeared to have from Sheffield children's hospital. Spoke to Approval Holder's doctor
ingested an amount of compost. Parents worried that compost who then rang and spoke with the doctor from Sheffield children's
contained the product although described as very small blue hospital. Everything in hand. 26.03.04 - spoke again wi
particles. Child vomited 3 times.
chlorpyrifos Received email from Nufarm UK concerning the product on treated Spoke to the grower. Told her no specific need to vent the
compost. Spoke to the grower who explained that they had container before use, but if she was concerned she should see her
continued to use the compost and were no longer having any GP and we could then contact our doctor.
problems. The grower would like to know whether any additional
precautions should be taken. Spoke to a Fargro representative - no
handling advice is normally given. Should not release any
chlorpyrifos unless damp.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Burning feeling on his back Worker complaining of a burning feeling on his back after applying Told her to get the worker to shower immediately. Wash clothing
triclopyr the product through a knapsack sprayer. What should she do? separately. Visit GP or A&E. Tell them it was the product and ring
us again if they need any more advice.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Hands feel itchy and numb. Subject spilled the product on hands when filling knapsack without Explained that it could sensitise skin. But there should not be
triclopyr gloves. This evening hands feel itchy and numb. lasting problems. Advised seeking medical help and offered to
send safety data sheet if needed. Gave direct dial telephone
number.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Feels nauseous Applied Pastor through knapsack sprayer. Today feels nauseous, Advised him to consult doctor and take safety data sheet with him.
triclopyr wonders if the two events are connected. I said unlikely. Offered further assistance if required.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Felt unwell. Subject was untying hay bale next to hedges. Farmer was spraying Explained the relevant points of the medical safety data sheet. Told
triclopyr the product in neighbouring field and she got covered. Walked her to visit her doctor and if she wanted the safety data sheet,
home and washed but felt unwell. Had spoken to her doctor who would fax it or let her doctor speak to us.
told her to trace product.
1/10/2011 26
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Feeling sick, headache and nasty taste in Approached her husband who was spraying the product through Told her to see doctor. Product likely to sensitise skin. Gave
triclopyr mouth. knapsack sprayer and he accidentally splashed her arm. 9.15 on contact details if doctor required the safety data sheet.
15.05.04, reported feeling sick headache and nasty taste in mouth,
no rash on skin.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Some skin irritation. Product sprayed from tractor mounted sprayer on Friday 7th May. Told him that unlikely that the product would affect his whole body,
triclopyr Subject has some skin irritation wondered if it could be the product? but he should see his doctor and if his doctor was concerned he
should contact us.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Suffering from vertigo. Patient (female) walked through field that had been sprayed with Doctor could not find product on the poisons database. Said
triclopyr product, was suffering from vertigo. unlikely to be product & doctor agreed.
clopyralid + fluroxypyr + Had nasty taste in mouth which still She was checking her sheep when neighbour started spraying the Told her to see her doctor. Gave name and number for her to give
triclopyr persists. product 50-100 yds away. Had nasty taste in mouth which still to doctor if he wishes safety data sheet . Told her active
persists. No apparent wind to cause drift, but nettles in her field ingredients in the product.
showing symptoms today.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Subject drank 250 ml of the product - information given by Faxed medical safety data sheet on product to SR. Warner.
Maidstone Hospital. Subject was being treated at hospital. Informed Approval Holder's and toxicologist. Approval Holder's
doctor contacted to ring.
clopyralid + triclopyr Severe hand shaking, rash on legs, fever Subjects brother in law applied the product through 18l backpack Key points of medical safety data sheet explained and a copy
and pain in scalp of head. sprayer, went to doctors Friday with severe hand shaking, rash on faxed. If any further concerns should go to the doctor. Also noted
legs, fever and pain in scalp of head. Brother in law brought label that brother in law had not followed necessary Personal Protective
to the doctors. Dr did not feel it was worthwhile chasing up as the Equipment advice on label.
brother in law is in his late 70's and on many medicines. Subject
just wanted to verify himself that the product was not the cause.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Spilled product from a knapsack (60ml/10l water) down his back. Advised he had done right thing. Suggested he see GP or A&E if
Washed within 10 minutes then showered. No Personal Protective any symptoms should not be absorbed in harmful amounts. Should
Equipment. wash clothes separately.
clopyralid + triclopyr Headache and reported feeling unwell. Subject removed his face mask whilst spraying the product. He Medical safety data sheet sent to Mr. Thompson, advised to consult
developed a headache and reported feeling unwell. his GP. Subsequently the advice given received call from Sister
Anderton (2.30 pm). Contacted Approval holder's doctor.
clopyralid + triclopyr Spray in eye. Sprayed nettles with dilute product, some were high and some Advised to wash eye continuously with water for 30 minutes. Also
spray may have gone in eye. Treated with optrec that night. advised he should visit A&E for check up due to the risk of eye
Running eyes in the morning. Advised to wash eye continuously injury from product. Followed up 07.06 went to hospital for eye
with water for 30 minutes. rinse. All appears ok now apart from minor eye irritation.
1/10/2011 27
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Speaking to the farmer when farmers son pushed the trigger of Advised he had done right thing. Suggested he see GP or A&E an
knapsack sprayer, spray hit eye. Already has medical safety data take medical safety data sheet with him. Also recommended A&E
sheet, and washed head and eyes in nearby stream. contact us if concerned.
clopyralid + triclopyr Feel ill, bad stomach. Sprayed around his fields on Friday, some spray got on him. Told him unlikely to make him ill. We could fax medical safety data
Started to feel ill, bad stomach. sheet to his doctor. He said he would ring back if that was
necessary but wanted to rule out the product.
clopyralid + triclopyr Blurred/double vision and sore eyes for Sprayed 1 x 25l knapsack with the product on 24/25/26 April. Has Advised him that the product can cause damage to eyes if in direct
last 3 days. had blurred/double vision and sore eyes for last 3 days. Thought contact, after confirming with the Approval holder's principle
as warm day vapour may have risen and irritated eyes. Spray did biologist, confirms that spray vapour unlikely to rise. Suggested he
not make direct contact with eyes. consulted his GP and ask his GP to call us if further i
clopyralid + triclopyr Small rash and itching 5-12 hours later Whilst spraying paddock, fine mist of spray came into contact with Likely gloves were too short. Product was 6 years old. Advised
wrist, just above the glove. Small rash and itching 5-12 hours later. that the product can cause sensitisation and advised operator to
Only sprayed for 10 minutes. talk to his GP if worried. Advised also he continued to bathe area
with water.
clopyralid + triclopyr Right hand red, swollen and itching. Face Applying the product with hand pumped spot sprayer. Not aware of Advised to see GP ASAP. Discussed dermal information on
red with itching behind ear. any exposure. Personal Protective Equipment was rubber boots, medical safety data sheet. Advised use of more suitable gloves for
normal clothing and surgical gloves. Used this method many times future applications.
before with no adverse reaction. Right hand red, swollen and
itching. Face red with itching behind ear. Symptoms appeared
gradually over last 10 days. Consumption of alcohol worsened
condition.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Paddock treated with product @11am. Mint picked unaware that Advised unlikely to a problem. Medical safety data sheet faxed on
paddock treated. Used in cooking potatoes. Girl aged 3 already the morning of 11.06.04.
had tonsillitis and temperature of 103° F.
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. While clearing up operator, splashed the product into face and Explained danger to eyes. Advised further washing of eyes and
maybe eyes (not sure if it was neat or diluted product). Has face and visit doctor or hospital A&E. Gave name and phone
washed face and eyes thoroughly, wanted to know what to do number offered to send safety data sheet .
next?
clopyralid + triclopyr None stated. Asked by a client to determine respirator requirements for knapsack Sent a current safety data sheet.
operator. Asked for details of solvent. Had a safety data sheet
dated 2000. I stated that there was no requirement for a respirator.
1/10/2011 28
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
clopyralid + triclopyr No irritation or sensitivity reported. Knapsack applied to control gorse. Nozzle became blocked. Advised correct action had been taken (except lack of Personal
Cleared blockage but pressure caused diluted mix to go on face. Protective Equipment). If irritation occurred recommended visit to
Washed eyes and face immediately for 10-15 mins. with clean GP or A&E. No further action required.
water. No irritation or sensitivity reported.
clopyralid + triclopyr Horses at livery. Livery owner sprayed the product where horses Assured Mrs. Whitfield there would be no long term effects. Issued
could gain access. Horses showed skin irritation to nose and lips. safety data sheet.
On second occasion, a woman picked up rope from sprayed area
and subsequently suffered bleeding lips.
dazomet Later same morning, driver complained of Spillage in lorry trailer at docks. Driver opened back of trailer and Called driver next day who had been released from hospital.
feeling unwell (he had not told anybody he noticed white powder leaking from a torn bag and seeping onto Incident closed.
had been exposed to the chemical dust road. Dock staff alerted and requested product Safety Data Sheet
when he opened the trailer door). which was provided by fax for assistance in clean-up of spillage. At
Ambulance called and driver was taken to hospital the driver was decontaminated, stomach pumped, given
local hospital. drugs to counteract the chemical poisoning. Two dock staff
concerned they also may have been exposed, ambulance called
and staff removed contaminated clothing. Staff kept in fresh air,
medics decided after an hour that staff had not been exposed and
could go home.
deltamethrin Tightness in his chest. On Wednesday 18th August, a man sprayed some of product in a Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer
confined space and subsequently noticed that he had a hole in his and confirms current course of action appropriate.
breathing apparatus.
dicamba + mecoprop-P + Suffered from cough, slight headache and Subject was using product to treat weeds in his lawn, application by He was advised to seek medical attention, and did so after a further
MCPA cold-like symptoms afterwards, but only sprayer. He emptied the product into the sprayer and noticed that it follow up call on 21st July. His doctor was not sure if he simply had
slight. did not have a colour, so he sniffed the opened can. a cold; he prescribed antibiotics and when contacted on 30th.
fludioxonil Flu like symptoms including dry throat, Symptoms were noticed 8 days after drilling seed. The symptoms Contracted employee was referred to Company Doctor and
muscular aches, malaise lasted about a week. The person was reported to be an asthmatic Occupational Hygeinist. The physician observed "no allergic
and did not wear any protective face mask when filling the drill. symptoms" and required no further follow up medical activities to be
undertaken.
fuberidazole + triadimenol No symptoms were reported. Possible inhalation of product in spray form after carrying out seed Closed on the basis that Dr Jackson has contacted enquirer and
treatment. The caller asked for toxicological information, passed on confirms no further issues likely.
to doctor.
1/10/2011 29
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Breast area tender, but no rash or Front of coat became soaked with dilute product whilst spraying. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. They advised
redness. Nausea. product of low toxicity, but seek GP's advice, take container. Caller
told GP could phone National Chemical Emergency Centre for
further information if required. They did not.
glyphosate Various symptoms attributed to Used product to spray brambles about 6 weeks ago and mask National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised from
indigestion, dry mouth and pins and slipped down at one stage. No actual exposure noted ( A mask is medical safety data sheet that no adverse health effects expected
needles. not required for this use anyway). from use of product and symptoms likely to be unrelated.
glyphosate Sore tongue. User may have put finger into mouth without washing, and it could National Chemical Emergency Centre took call from patient's GP.
have had product contamination on it. He was satisfied from the information given from the medical safety
data sheet that the product was not the cause.
glyphosate Sore throat and diahorrea. Caller also User had a thorn in her finger and removed it with her mouth. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advice
suffers from food intolerances. Previously she had spilt the product onto her hands and had not provided from medical safety data sheet.
washed it off.
glyphosate Skin irritation and redness. Patient has Can of product was spilt in the back of a van and cleared up with Caller was patient's GP who phoned National Chemical Emergency
history of skin problems. bare hands. Centre. They advised that slight irritation was possible and faxed
medical safety data sheet.
glyphosate Caller had a sore throat before he used User had handled product with bare hands and then put hands into Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre, who informed
the product, but after putting his hand in mouth without washing them. caller from medical safety data sheet that product was non-irritant
his mouth the symptoms got worse. and unlikely to be responsible for his throat condition worsening.
Advised to see GP if symptoms got worse.
glyphosate See 08/07/03. Large range of symptoms Local council have been spraying the streets. No direct incident Company retained doctor telephoned and discussed symptoms.
resulting from a damaged immune can be traced, but caller suffers from Multiple Chemical
system. Sensitisation Syndrome and claims to react to minute quantities of
numerous household and industrial chemicals.
glyphosate None. Member of public cycling along a canal towpath, was inadvertently Sent technical details of product and caller was satisfied there was
sprayed by a council sprayer. Spray droplets had landed on him not a problem with the exposure he had encountered. Caller told to
from above. come back if he did suffer any symptoms, he did not.
glyphosate A hot stinging red rash on his thighs and Product had leaked onto his legs, he stated that he had potentially Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advised from
buttocks. been exposed to the product for 5 hours. medical safety data sheet. Possible sensitisation reaction, product
not toxic. But seek medical attention for symptoms.
glyphosate Soreness, itching and blisters. Spilt product on arm and requested advice for treatment. Company retained doctor contacted caller and gave advice.
1/10/2011 30
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Urticaria. Sprayed nettles were being cut down with scissors and caused a None. Caller satisfied the rash was a classic urticaria rash resulting
rash in the small boy who was handling them. from direct contact with the nettles, not the product, which had been
applied some time previously.
glyphosate Painful throat. Sprayed in gusty conditions. Some 'fumes' may have entered nasal Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Caller advised
passages. not likely to be caused by inhalation of spray from medical safety
data sheet information.
glyphosate Rash on back, headache and vomiting. Spilt diluted spray on back whilst using product. Washed off only Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advised
after several hours. product not likely to be cause of symptoms, but advised to seek
medical attention.
glyphosate Felt 'a little unwell' and had a taste in his Breathed in mist whilst spraying. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. They
mouth. consulted medical safety data sheet and advised to seek further
medical advice from GP if symptoms do not go away.
glyphosate No symptoms reported. Subject was adult male user of the product. Reported contact with No report to PSD or HSE required at the time of the incident.
eyes during use and sought advice re treatment. No symptoms or
long-term effects reported. User sought advice re treatment and
followed safety data sheet instructions for contact with eyes.
glyphosate Asthma. Member of public saw dead weeds 4 weeks after council had A letter was written explaining the safety of the herbicide. There
sprayed and blamed the pesticide for her asthma. was no link to any exposure to the pesticide.
glyphosate Headache. No specific incident, but operator who used the product was now None required. GP was satisfied no connection with the product
suffering from headaches. GP wanted to check pesticide spraying operation and headache presented.
characteristics.
glyphosate Chest symptoms and nasal discomfort. Caller inhaled some spray whilst walking past farmer spraying. National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised caller
from medical safety data sheet that product of low toxicity and
unlikely to cause symptoms. Caller was going to visit GP, and was
advised GP could ring National Chemical Emergency Centre for
glyphosate Sore, puffy, blotchy skin on arms. Had used product on previous day. No exposure noted. Call Taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advised
product not expected to cause skin irritation from medical safety
data sheet.
glyphosate Inflammation and swelling of the wrists Subject was applying the product from time to time during the day. Subject attended local casualty department with copy of product
The symptoms were noticed in the evening after work. label and medical safety data sheet. Treatment was administered -
no details available. The subject reported for work as normal the
following day.
1/10/2011 31
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Complaining of sore throat and nausea. Applying product as a spray all day. Visited GP. Under observation. GP believed symptoms due to
dehydration and heat stroke.
glyphosate No symptoms were reported. A lady who works as a spray operator is 3 months pregnant, and Details passed to company doctor. Closed on the basis doctor has
wanted to know if using the product during pregnancy would harm contacted enquirer and confirms no further issues.
her unborn child.
glyphosate Unknown. National Poisons Information Service checking if the product is an National Poisons Information Service was satisfied symptoms not
OP, as an elderly man has been admitted to hospital after drinking related to the product.
an unknown substance. They are checking all products found on
the premises.
glyphosate Not known. Member of public who was unwell after noticing a yellow council The council involved asked us for details on the product safety, but
vehicle, and claimed she was unwell as a result of exposure to later established there had been no council spraying in the area at
pesticide used by council. the time alleged and the claim was dropped.
imazalil + triticonazole Diarrhoea & tiredness. Used dressing for grass seed (barley). Product got onto husbands Exposure likely due to poor hygiene. Advised that GP can contact
hand, then ate sandwiches. He has been to doctor but still has company doctor if symptoms persist. No calls received. Incident
diarrhoea and is very tired. closed.
imidacloprid + beta- After a short while he was sick. A man who was using the product then ate his sandwiches. He obtained medical treatment. Closed on the basis that company
cyfluthrin doctor has contacted enquirer and confirms that symptoms
unrelated to product, but offers to advise GP if required. No call
received. Incident closed.
lambda-cyhalothrin Mild A GP called regarding a patient who had inhaled lambda- Data sheet sent. GP told if he needed any further information to let
cyhalothrin whilst spraying. Mild symptoms exhibited, requested a us know. No further contact from G.P. No further information due
safety data sheet to patient confidentiality.
lambda-cyhalothrin Irritation of chin and neck Gentleman had been spraying product all day. Caller was advised to remove any clothing that he had been
wearing during application and to thoroughly wash the affected
areas. Also advised to go to A+E if the irritation continued. Also
advised to take the emergency number with him. Were contacted
by
mecoprop-P + MCPA + Not known. The product had been applied to an area of grass by a contractor, The incident was reported to HSE by a Borough Council under the
dicamba on behalf of a Borough Council. 5 Days post-application, a council Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences
employee was detailed to mow the treated area. The employee Regulations 1995 (RIDDOR) as an industrial accident.
claimed that mowing the treated grass had made him ill and he was
unable to work. It was stated that the employee concerned had a
bad record for 'calling in sick'.
1/10/2011 32
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
paraquat None A gentleman called and said that he had splashed his neck with No follow up
dilute paraquat. He had immediately rinsed it off with water and
then went and had a bath. He was seeking reassurance that he
had done the right thing. He was advised to go to his GP if any
reaction occurred
propachlor Red skin on stomach and arms. Contamination from spray application. Medical safety data sheet sent. Company retained doctor
contacted caller re best treatment.
tebuconazole + triadimenol Tightness in his chest. Callers husband was filling spray tank with product. Some Closed on the basis that company doctor has contacted enquirer
splashed back into his mouth. He brushed his teeth and rinsed his and confirms no further issues.
mouth with mouthwash but was still worried.
terbutryn Sore eye. Caller had splashed small amount of product in eye. Had washed Advised that had followed correct course of action, and the action of
eye but still sore. washing the eye may be the reason for soreness. If symptoms
persist, advised to see his GP, taking the packet with him.
terbutryne Red eye Splashed product into eye Gentleman advised to rinse the eye for a least 10 minutes and
advised to see his GP. A follow up call was made a few days later
and caller had been to his GP and there was no lasting damage.
triclopyr + fluroxypyr No symptoms. National poisons Unit, Ireland. Do not have any information about Sent medical safety data sheet to poisons unit. Also spoke to the
the product. They have a patient who has drunk about a pint of the approval Holder's doctor and offered further help if required.
product.
2004 Amateur Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
2,4-D + mecoprop-P + Felt ill some time after exposure. The product was diluted spray mist possibly inhaled. None.
dicamba
2,4-D + mecoprop-P None. Focus DIY called to say child in store possibly had sprayed product None.
into face.
aluminium ammonium Eye felt irritated. Whilst spraying some spray had blown into eye. Rinsed with cold None.
sulphate water.
bifenthrin None. Parent concerned and asking for advice as young son had sprayed Advised that clothing and bedding be removed and washed and
product onto 11 week old baby. Mother had wiped face with baby also baby to be washed and cleaned around the eyes. Advised GP
wipes. check due to age of baby.
1/10/2011 33
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
bifenthrin Rash on skin. Subject was spraying fruit trees when hands and arms had contact Doctor prescribed anti-histamine - hydrocortisone cream.
with product through drift.
ferrous sulphate Some eye irritation. Subject got small amount of product in his eye on windy day. He None.
had been spreading by hand. Rinsed eye to remove granules but
still some irritation.
glufosinate ammonium + Severe rash on legs. Subject was spraying when she fell and was covered with spray on None.
fatty acids her legs. Doctor prescribed cortisone cream.
glyphosate None. Tesco reported that product leaked over customer's hands. None.
Requested advice.
imidacloprid Eye irritated. Subject sprayed and drift hit face and eyes. Rinsed face and eyes None.
but one eye still irritated. Requested advice.
imidacloprid None. Product leaked in plastic carrier bag and dropped onto subject's None.
legs and hands.
imidacloprid Feeling giddy. Subject had been spraying in greenhouse and 'sniffed' some of the None.
spray. Spouse had called for advice.
imidacloprid Sore tongue and mouth. Subject was sold leaking container. Used gloves but experienced None.
some soreness on tongue and mouth. Advised that as no route to
contamination, this co-incidental.
imidacloprid None. Young girl ate some granules, parent called for advice. None.
imidacloprid None. Product leaked and plastic carrier bag and dropped onto subject's None.
leg.
imidacloprid Rash to legs. Subject sprayed product with bare legs. Rash developed after 40 None.
mins. and still present after 3 weeks. Possibility of allergic reaction,
subject advised to contact doctor for treatment.
mancozeb Some irritation. Droplet of spray solution got in eye whilst spraying. Subject flushed Subject advised to thoroughly flush eye and if irritation persisted to
eye. seek medical help from a doctor or hospital, as product is an irritant.
mecoprop-P + dicamba None. Contamination of hands with wax from working on lawn where None.
weeds had been treated previously.
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + Red itchy rash. Product used 7 days previously then it rained. Subject (and None.
mecoprop-P children) claimed red itchy rash over body after playing on lawn.
Concerned on safety.
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + Unusual taste in mouth. Inhaled some dust. Experienced unusual taste in mouth and None.
mecoprop-P concerned as she has mild asthma. Requested advice.
1/10/2011 34
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + None. Subject inhaled dust when pack opened to pour into applicator. None.
mecoprop-P Requested advice on safety of product.
metaldehyde None. Small child was playing among slug pellets and father worried he None.
may have eaten some and wanted advice.
metaldehyde Eye irritation. Employee at Makro got speck of pellet dust in eye causing irritation. None.
Advised to wash eye thorough with plenty of water.
myclobutanil Feeling 'spaced out'. No clear link with Spraying hedge around midday. Afterwards felt 'spaced out' in None.
spraying established. evening.
myclobutanil Sore throat. Spraying roses 3 days earlier, now experiencing sore throat. None.
myclobutanil None. Used sprayer with solution of product on crème brulee believing None.
only water in sprayer. Ate dessert. Requesting advice.
rotenone Painful eye. Subject experienced some drift on face whilst spraying. Protective None.
glasses were used so not specifically felt in eyes. However painful
eye problem that night. Fucithalmic treatment being taken for
conjunctivitis.
rotenone Admission to hospital after collapsing. Subject admitted to Kingston hospital after drinking bottle of product Notified PSD at time of incident. No specific report given.
Result of autopsy unclear but assumed following a domestic dispute. Subject hospitalised following
death as result of acute poisoning. collapse at home after ingesting a whole bottle (200ml) of product.
She did not recover and died in hospital.
glyphosate Slight reddening, irritation of the eyelids. Wind blew spray into eye whilst using product. National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and gave advice
from medical safety data sheet.
glyphosate Has a blister on his leg. Used product 4 days ago and thinks he may have splashed some Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre, advised from
on leg. medical safety data sheet that low toxicity product unlikely to cause
described symptoms, but to visit GP and take pack.
glyphosate Diarrhoea. Some diluted spray blown back on skin whilst applying. Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Caller advised
symptoms unlikely from product, as not absorbed through skin, but
to consult GP if he had concerns.
glyphosate Redness, swelling and tingling on skin, but Spilt some on skin whilst using product. Not known if washed off GP was satisfied from medical safety data sheet that product not
not until 2 weeks after product used. immediately. cause of symptoms.
glyphosate 24 hrs after accident had tingling skin, An employee at a garden centre was accidentally sprayed in face Reported to Approval Holder, then to National Chemical Emergency
swollen eyes. Was not reported to by ready to use spray applicator being 'tested' by a member of the Centre. Medical safety data sheet sent. Company doctor
Approval Holder for over a month. public close by. He did wash the affected area, but only after some contacted who advised further. Incident had been investigated by
time had elapsed. Local Environmental Health Officer.
1/10/2011 35
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
glyphosate Red and sore, pharmacy treated as Spilt pesticide on hand. Company retained doctor contacted caller and advised treatment.
chemical burn. Reaction confirmed as dermatitis, but not caused by chemical.
glyphosate 24 hours later he felt some numbness and Spray had accidentally covered his arm whilst spraying. He had Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. They referred
nausea. washed the affected area. caller to his GP for peace of mind and advised him to take the
container.
glyphosate The day after using the product, patient Patient had been using product diluted in his garden. No exposure Company retained doctor contacted patient and advised.
developed itching irritation in one eye. was noticed at the time.
This quickly spread to both eyes and
caused his face to swell to the extent that
it caused both eyes to close. He had
been in hospital for 7 days.
glyphosate Not known. Hospital called about a patient suspected of having ingested Dr requested medical safety data sheet which was sent. Needed
product. No details known. reassurance product did not contain paraquat. It does not.
glyphosate Sore throat and blisters on the tongue. No known contact with product, though was applying it to his National Chemical Emergency Centre took call and advised from
garden 5 days before he rang with symptoms. medical safety data sheet, low toxicity of product unlikely to be
cause of symptoms, especially so long after possible exposure.
glyphosate Burning chest pain and 'lump' in throat. Had sprayed product diluted 50:1 a few hours earlier and now had Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Caller advised
symptoms. from medical safety data sheet symptoms unlikely to result from
product of low toxicity, but to visit GP, who could contact National
Chemical Emergency Centre if required. They did not.
glyphosate Severe allergic reaction. Used product and suffered some sort of 'extreme reaction' in 30 Phoned Approval Holder who sent letter requesting further details
mins.. of incident, contact, outcome etc. No further contact received from
caller, presumed satisfied not product related.
glyphosate Skin irritation on arms still present after a After using product in her garden caller had skin irritation on her Call taken by National Chemical Emergency Centre. Advised to
week. Caller suffers from allergies. arms. No exposure noticed, caller wanted to ask if symptoms might see GP about skin problem, but that unlikely to be caused by
be connected to product. product. Likelihood of allergic reaction to irritant plants discussed
& accepted. GP welcome to contact National Chemical Emergen
glyphosate Loss of weight and appettite, stomach Had used product in May. No exposure noted. Call taken by Approval Holder, letters were exchanged but GP
upsets. subsequently diagnosed gastroenteritis.
1/10/2011 36
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
tar oil Dryness of throat and aching legs. Product used in January to treat fruit trees. Caller was now Advised that given time elapsed, unlikely that the product was
suffering from dryness of throat and aching legs, wondered if causing symptoms, recommended that he consult his GP.
product could be responsible.
diuron + glufosinate- No symptoms. Caller had got product in her hair whilst using yesterday. She had Reviewed safety data sheet, advised caller the product was not
ammonium washed her hair, but was now concerned that the product may highly toxic, and that she had taken the correct course of action
cause harm. washing it off. Advised that if she did experience any skin irritation
she should consult her GP.
paraquat + diquat No symptoms. Caller got product into open wound on his hand when spraying Advised to wash wound. If there were any signs of
plants. Wanted to know what to do. inflammation/change, he should seek medical attention.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Red skin. Caller used product yesterday, some blew into her face. Skin on Advised that could be an allergic reaction, and to visit her GP, who
ferrous sulphate face now red, as if sunburned. could contact National Chemical Emergency Centre for further
information on the product if required.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller‟s son had eaten some granules Advised the product is non-toxic and child should not be affected.
ferrous sulphate
MCPA + mecoprop-P + High temperature. Caller had used product yesterday. Shortly after it was applied, Caller confirmed no signs of skin or eye irritation, product not been
ferrous sulphate young child came into contact with the treated area. Child now ingested. Child had been bathed to remove any product that could
suffering from high temperature, was the product responsible. have been in contact with skin. Advised that, from the information
given, it was highly unlikely that the product caus
paraquat + diquat + Not available. Caller stated that his 20-year-old son had eaten at least one sachet Advised the product contains paraquat, and son should be taken to
amitrole + simazine of the product. Caller wished to know if his son would be ok. Caller hospital immediately with product.
refused to give name, number or location.
paraquat + diquat + Flu-like. Caller‟s friend had splashed some product on arm, since suffered Advised that the symptoms described seemed unlikely to be result
amitrole + simazine flu-like symptoms and wanted to know if product responsible. of product. Advised to wash arm/affected area thoroughly, if she
Confirmed that none had been ingested. had any concerns to visit her GP taking the product.
glyphosate trimesium + Vomiting. Caller‟s partner used product yesterday, last night his partner Advised that product unlikely to cause symptoms unless some had
diruon became ill and was sick several times. Caller confirmed nothing been ingested. Recommended that they contact their GP, and if he
ingested, no eye or skin irritation although some may have been had any further questions about the product he could call.
inhaled. Caller wanted to know if product responsible.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller had been spreading product. Baby started to cry and she Advised to wash her hands and ensure there is not residual dust on
ferrous sulphate picked it up without washing her hands, is there likely to be a the child. If the baby showed symptoms of illness she should seek
problem? medical attention letting them know what the child may have been
exposed to.
1/10/2011 37
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Strange taste and tingling sensation on Caller had been using product. Then read newspaper, licked her Advised to wash hands and rinse mouth well. Advised that the
ferrous sulphate tongue. fingers to help turn the pages (Had not washed hands after product was of low toxicity and unlikely to cause any serious ill
applying product). Caller stated her fingers tasted strange and her effects, if irritation persisted she should visit her GP, taking the
tongue had a tingling sensation. Could the product cause this? product with her.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Skin red and blotchy. Caller had treated an area some days previously, afterwards he Advised the product may cause mild irritation, though this would
ferrous sulphate went to dig some weeds out of the area. Has since had irritated vary from person to person. Advised if the condition persists to
skin on hands & fingers (Caller confirmed he has sensitive skin). consult his GP.
diquat Red and itchy rash on arms. Caller‟s elderly mother had used product in windy conditions and Advised to revisit GP, and to inform him of the contact with product.
got spray on her arms, which was not washed off at the time of the
incident. She now has skin irritation. Has already seen GP, who
had prescribed cream, (simple moisturiser) however it appears GP
was not advised of contact with product.
metaldehyde No symptoms. Caller‟s 18 month old daughter had eater small amount of the Advised to take child to hospital. Told caller hospital could contact
product. National Chemical Emergency Centre if they required further details
about the product.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Rash on legs. Caller‟s lawn had recently been treated with product. His 2 young Advised that they have a possible allergic reaction to product,
ferrous sulphate children were playing on the lawn 2 days ago, both children have advised to take children to GP, and take the packet with them. The
developed rash on their legs. doctor could contact National Chemical Emergency Centre for
further information if required.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Allergic reaction. Caller‟s heavily pregnant wife walked barefoot across treated lawn, Advised to wash effected areas, if rash persists visit GP, taking
ferrous sulphate used hands to wipe feet, then rubbed hands on arms. All three product pack with them.
areas sore and blotchy.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Skin colouration. Caller‟s daughter‟s skin turned orange where contacted product. Colouration probably due to ferrous sulphate. Advised to wash skin
ferrous sulphate and soiled clothes. If any skin reaction occurred to seek medical
attention.
MCPA + dichloroprop-P + Sickness and diarrhoea. Caller‟s grandchildren played on lawn 3 days after it was treated. Advised caller that if the product had been used at correct dilution,
dicamba + ferrous sulphate 48 hours later the children had sickness and diarrhoea. Could the the children would have had to ingest a significant amount to cause
product be responsible? the reaction described. Advised if symptoms persist children go to
GP, mention product.
bifenthrin Irritated eyes and throat. Caller was sprayed in face with product a month ago. She had Advised to return to GP for review of the treatment.
seen her GP and prescribed treatment, but still suffers symptoms.
1/10/2011 38
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller‟s young child crawled across the lawn shortly after treatment, Advised to wash the affected areas thoroughly with soap and water,
ferrous sulphate then put her hands in her mouth. and give the child water to drink. If he has any concerns, or the
child becomes unwell, he should take her to the doctors, along with
the packet.
bifenthrin + myclobutanil Blotchy red and itchy skin, felt faint, dizzy Caller had inhaled product while gardening the previous evening. Informed caller that product was unlikely to have cause such a
and disorientated, nausea. She developed blotchy red and itchy skin, felt faint, dizzy and reaction, but advised her to visit her GP.
disorientated. She woke in the night feeling nauseas.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s son had been playing with the product. Caller was unsure Advised caller of hazards, and advised that should his son show
if child had come into contact with the liquid. any signs of being unwell then he should seek medical attention.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + Chest irritation. Caller had applied too much product to lawn, and was trying to Advised to avoid making anymore dust and damp or hose down the
ferrous sulphate remove excess. However, it produced a dust cloud and her chest area. If the irritation in her chest did not ease advised to consult
felt irritated. Caller explained she did suffer from asthma. her doctor.
diquat No symptoms. Caller had splashed product in his mouth while spraying, had Advised that, due to the limited contact was unlikely to cause any
already washed out his mouth, should he take further precautions? health problems.
glyphosate trimesium + No symptoms. Caller‟s mother had sprayed some product into her eye. The eye Advised to seek medical attention.
diuron had been rinsed, but they wanted further advice.
glyphosate Swollen knee. Caller had kneeled in area treated with product. Affected area was Advised that the product only has low irritant effect, but since
washed. experiencing reaction should seek medical attention, taking packet
to GP with her. Advised that her GP could contact National
Chemical Emergency Centre for further information if required.
fluroxypyr + clopyralid + Dizzy „unwell‟. Caller had used product previous day. Later that day he felt dizzy Advised product may cause skin irritation in some individuals.
MCPA and unwell. Today he was sick after breakfast. His GP was due to Caller stated he suffered no irritation to skin. Suggested he discuss
visit him today (was on prescription drugs after being in hospital). the incident with his GP when he visits later, the GP could call
National Chemical Emergency Centre for further product
diquat + paraquat Itchy legs (but child suffers eczema). Caller applied product using watering can. Watering can was not Advised to take child and packet to the hospital.
totally empty when caller‟s child took and refilled it for a water fight.
Caller believed child may have drunk from spout of the watering
can.
1/10/2011 39
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
MCPA + mecoprop-P Rash. Caller had developed a rash after strimming her lawn a week earlier Advised that as she had already seen her GP she should continue
(and a week after treatment with product). She had seen her GP, with treatment prescribed.
who was unsure of the cause and she wanted to know if the
product was responsible.
fluroxypyr + clopyralid + No symptoms. Caller had got spray onto himself while treating a hedge. He had Advised that the product was low toxicity, but if he began to shows
MCPA taken a shower. symptoms of irritation he should seek medical advice.
metaldehyde No symptoms. Caller suspected that her 7 yr old child had swallowed some of the Advised to take child to casualty immediately, together with the
product. packets. The medical staff could contact National Chemical
Emergency Centre for further product information if required.
fatty acids + sulphur Reddening of toe. Caller had spilt some product on her toe. Advised to wash affected parts with soap and plenty of water, told
product was unlikely to cause a problem.
fluroxypyr + clopyralid + Hot/red skin on feet. Caller had spilt product on both feet the previous day. Both feet Advised unlikely that the product was of low toxicity and unlikely to
MCPA had developed hot and red areas of skin, was the product cause such a reaction. Advised caller to visit his GP for medical
responsible? assessment.
diquat No symptoms. Caller had been trying to open product with her mouth, and Advised that she had done the right thing rinsing her mouth, she
inadvertently sprayed some of the product into her mouth. She had had no other allergic reaction.
rinsed her mouth, and not ingested any of the product.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller was GP with patient that had used product week before, & Advised that the product is of low toxicity and unlikely to cause any
ferrous sulphate got some dust from the product on his clothes which he had worn side effects/illness. Advised patient launder the clothing before
several times. The patient was now worried about the effects of the wearing it again.
product on his skin.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s husband had accidentally sprayed product into son‟s eyes. Advised that had taken correct course of action, if concerned could
Eyes had already been flushed with water. seek medical advise, as a precaution.
glyphosate Blisters on index finger. Caller had used the product 3 weeks previously and since suffered Advised that product is of low toxicity, and did not think it
blisters on his index finger. responsible for symptoms. Advised to visit his GP, his GP could
contact National Chemical Emergency Centre for further
information on the product if required.
diquat No symptoms. Call from GP dealing with a 22 month old child that may have Advised on that product was unlikely to be toxic unless consumed
ingested an unknown amount of the product. in large quantities, advised of active ingredient and faxed copy of
the safety data sheet to the doctor.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s 33-month-old son had ingested unknown amount of the Advised to seek immediate medical attention, and take product with
product. Child was given milk to drink, what further action should them to show the medical personnel.
they take.
1/10/2011 40
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
fluroxypyr + clopyralid No symptoms. Caller had splashed some diluted product on his face and lips. Advised to wash face thoroughly with soap and water. Given the
low exposure, unlikely to be side effects but if he has concerns to
visit his GP, taking the packet with him.
bupirimate + pirimicarb + No symptoms. Caller had got some product on hands and arm, and concerned she Advised that the product is of low toxicity but may cause skin
triforine may have inhaled some. She had washed her arms with soap and sensitisation, so if she did suffer a reaction she should visit her GP,
water. taking the product with her.
metaldehyde No symptoms. Caller‟s 2-yr-old child gained access to treated area, got some of As unknown if ingestion occurred advised to take child to doctor
product in mouth, caller removed one or two pellets from mouth and immediately. Advised GP could contact National Chemical
rinsed mouth. Did not know if any had been ingested Emergency Centre for further information on the product.
diquat + paraquat Swollen foot. Caller had spilt product over foot 2 weeks earlier, since suffered Advised to return to GP for further advice/treatment.
from swelling on the foot. Had already visited his GP.
glyphosate trimesium + No symptoms. Caller had sprayed himself in eye with product. Had rinsed eye for Advised to rinse eye, and under the eyelid for further 15 minutes.
diuron a few minutes, what else should he do? Advised to seek medical attention, and the GP could contact
National Chemical Emergency Centre for further product
information if required.
amitrole + diquat + No symptoms Caller‟s 16-month old son put pebble in mouth from drive that had Advised that given the heavy rain since application, and that only
paraquat + simazine been treated with the product the day before. The caller had rinsed parts of the drive had been treated, the quantity of product ingested
the child‟s mouth and given him water to drink. There had been was negligible. However, advised to keep the child under
heavy overnight rain. observation and seek attention if showed symptoms of being un
bifenthrin No symptoms. Caller had sprayed a small amount of product into eye. Had Advised that product was of low toxicity and causes minimal
thoroughly washed eye, but wanted to know if anything further irritation to eyes. Had taken the correct action and there should be
should do? no serious effect, but if he had any concerns to visit GP and take
the packet with him.
MCPA + dicamba + No symptoms. Caller‟s grandson walked over lawn recently treated with product, Advised that the product is of low toxicity but may act as mild skin
mecoprop-P he put his hands on the lawn, then his face. The child had been irritant. Caller stated child showed no signs of irritation. Advised to
thoroughly washed. wash again, to be sure that all traces had been removed.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s young nephew had squirted himself with product. He had Advised that if no product had been ingested, no harm was likely to
been bathed immediately, should they take further action? come to the child. However, his behaviour should be monitored for
the next couple of hours and if anything abnormal was noticed to
visit her GP.
glyphosate trimesium + No symptoms. Caller‟s 31/2 yr old had eaten berry from a bush treated with As it was unclear how many berries the child had eaten, advised to
diuron product day before. She wanted to know what action to take? seek medical advice as a precautionary measure, taking the
product with her.
1/10/2011 41
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
copper oxychloride Stomach pains, fever. Caller had been treating tomatoes with product. He stopped Seemed unlikely that the product was responsible for his illness, but
spraying fortnight ago, but suffered stomach pains & fever after if had any concerns to visit his GP, taking the product with him.
eating ½ tomato. Was the product responsible? (His spouse had
also eaten some tomatoes, with no effect).
glyphosate trimesium + Chronic headaches. Caller had suffered headaches for last 7 days, since using product. Explained that the information available did not suggest that she
diuron Was it responsible? Had already seen GP. should suffer headaches. Advised to return to GP for further
treatment.
MCPA + mecoprop-P + No symptoms. Caller‟s 17-month old son may have ingested some of the product. Asked if there were signs of redness/irritation in or around the
ferrous sulphate Caller had washed out child‟s mouth, and washed his hands and child‟s mouth, caller said no. Explained that the product was of low
face, and given him a small drink. toxicity, but may cause irritation to the child‟s mouth/skin. Advised
to monitor him and if any signs of irritation app
bifenthrin Feeling „unwell‟. Caller had got some product on hands when treating plants. He Advised that the product was of low toxicity, however, as he was
then prepared food, and started eating it. unwell, advised to rinse his mouth with water then seek immediate
medical advice. He was advised to take the container to the
doctors with him.
diquat No symptoms. Caller‟s 7 yr old son had sprayed dog, the television and himself Asked if the child was showing any signs of irritation, told no, but if
with product. The dog and child had been showered and were signs developed she would take him to casualty. Advised that if
showing no ill effects, should they stay out of the affected area. product had been removed from surfaces then they could re-enter
the area.
chlorpyrifos Multiple sclerosis and says smell has Contractor laid 100 sqm. turf suffering from st.marks fly. He Emailed safety data sheet. Gave the Approval Holder's doctor
made condition worse. returned and made 2 sprays, one of each product. Smell lasted for contact numbers.
2 days. Subject has multiple sclerosis and says smell has made his
condition worse. He has consulted his doctor. I confirmed that the
product is not cleared for garden use.
chlorpyrifos Follow up report original 19.05.04. 1. Spoke to Subject, has Not applicable.
received safety data sheet and is happy with information. 2. The
Approval Holder's doctor has been in touch and has also been
helpful. 3. HSE Scotland have been involved but he has not
revealed contractor name. 4. Contractor has admitted that operator
was not certificated.
ferrous sulphate + 2, 4-D + None. Parent concerned that child (18 months old) may have consumed a None.
mecoprop-P pellet. No sign of pellet in mouth. Requested advice on safety.
1/10/2011 42
Human Health Incident Reports 2004
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms Details of Incident Action Undertaken by Company
paraquat Tingling sensation in arm Splashed his arm two weeks ago in Spain Advised to go to GP. This was followed up a few days later and the
gentleman had seen his GP and all was okay.
paraquat Fatal Contacted by a hospital for analysis of serum and urine samples for No further information available due to patient confidentiality.
paraquat. Paraquat ingestion was confirmed by analysis. Exposure
confirmed by serum and urine analysis. Treatment conducted by
the hospital.
paraquat Fatal Not Known picked up incident in the media A gentleman accidentally ingested paraquat during the night.
Someone had stolen the paraquat and decanted it into a Cola
bottle and put it in the bowling club. Gentleman had arrived at
bowling club for a few drinks and put his shopping in the storeroom.
paraquat Oral blistering Call from a Doctor at A+E of Hospital regarding a women who had Patient subsequently recovered and was discharged from hospital.
consumed a quantity of paraquat and a bottle of absinthe. Urine
tested positive for paraquat. Requested paraquat plasma analysis
and paraquat poisoning guide. Attempted suicide. Urine analysis
and plasma analysis confirmed paraquat ingestion.
1/10/2011 43
2005 Professional Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms
No information given None stated
Rash on hands and generally
500 g/L Carbendazim
feeling unwell
atrazine Flu-like symptoms
azoxystrobin chlorothalonil
She had skin irritation in an intimate
carbendazim
area
bromoxynil None stated
Chlormequat Chloride None
chlorothalonil,
None
cyproconazole
Weakness and stomach cramps.
chlorpyrifos
Difficult getting in and out of bed.
Chlorpyrifos Flu like symptoms
Clopyralid Triclopyr Cough and sore throat
Feeling unwell since spraying with
Clopyralid Triclopyr product. Grower also feeling dizzy,
off colour, loss of appetite.
Clopyralid Triclopyr N/A
Clopyralid Triclopyr N/A
Clopyralid Triclopyr N/A
clopyralid, diflufenican,
feeling poorly.
MCPA.
Clopyralid/Triclopyr Feeling unwell
Dichlobenil Swelling on the back of hand
The fumes had made her feel sick.
dichlorophen
Red and sore hands.
diquat Rash all over his body
diquat Blistered lips which will not heal up.
diuron N/A
Ethoprophos Swollen knees and hands
Fluazinam Severe allergic reaction
fludioxonil None
Fluroxypyr Tingling on lips and nose
Fluroxypyr Felt tingling sensation in hands
glyphosate Sore throat and cough
glyphosate None
glyphosate Skin had reddened.
Generally felt unwell and had
glyphosate
burning sensation in his mouth.
glyphosate Dry mouth and throat
Some burning sensation after
glyphosate bathing for 20 minutes in water,
which eased subsequently
In May non-specific allegations of
emphysemia, asthma, sickness and
glyphosate headaches in several people, but
by 4th July she said she was
suffering from multiple allergies.
She had a tingling feeling in the
glyphosate
exposed areas of her face.
glyphosate was sick 6 times overnight
glyphosate None reported
Large range of symptoms resulting
glyphosate
from a damaged immune system.
He was now suffering from
Glyphosate
stomach cramps and diahorrea.
isoproturon Rash on the inside of his mouth
Magnesium Phosphide Not known.
Maleic Hydrazide Sore and raw tongue
Maleic Hydrazide Blood in urine
Caller's daughter (age unknown,
MCPA but adult) had been suffering from a
atrazine skin condition and flu-like
symptoms for last 2 weeks and had
been admitted to hospital.
An 'allergic reaction' No other
mecoprop-p and dicamba
information given.
Red cheeks, skin irritation, tingling,
mesosulfuron & iodosulfuron
glowing.
Metaldehyde N/A
Trouble breathing, smell, taste and
Myclobutanil
burning back of tongue
Myclobutanil N/A
None specified ME, glandular fever
paraquat
Severe head-ache, loss of co-
pirimiphos-methyl ordination and severe light
headedness
propamocarb
hydrochloride,
None
chlorothalonil.
The eye is now swollen and
prothioconazole.
irritated.
Roundup - glyphosate,
None
formulation not specified
Experienced burning at a tightness
tefluthrin
in his chest.
tefluthrin Skin rashes and skin irritation
Triclopyr Irritation
Trifluralin N/A
Trifluralin None
2005 Unknown Use Cases
Active Ingriedient - If Symptoms
known
Irate chest, headaches, arching
Not Known
joints (flu like symptoms)
Chlorpyrifos Skin rash
Sore throat and severe headache
MCPA or mecoprop-p in the evening following exposure.
No skin irritation or redness.
paraquat Renal and respiratory failure
Not Known Unknown, patient confidentiality
2005 Amateur Use Cases
Active Ingriedient(s) Symptoms
2,4-D, Dicamba Felt overcome
2,4-D, dicamba Symptoms unknown.
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diruon No symptoms
Initially experienced cold like
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron symptoms, which had subsequently
gone.
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron Cold/flu like symptoms
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron Diarrhoea feeling „unwell‟
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron No symptoms
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron No symptoms
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron Headache, sickness
Amitrole, 2,4-D, diuron No symptoms
Amitrole, paraquat, diquat,
Various chest problems.
simazine
Bifenthrin No symptoms
Bifenthrin Swollen finger
Bifenthrin Rough throat, tight chest
Bifenthrin Rash developed on torso
Bifenthrin, flutriafol No symptoms
Rash developed on legs 3 days
Bifenthrin, myclobutanil
after the incident.
Developed large swelling, skin
Bifenthrin, myclobutanil became red and blotchy.
(Symptoms of bystander, not user.)
Bifenthrin, myclobutanil No symptoms
Diquat No symptoms
Diquat No symptoms.
Diquat Rash on hands, became ill.
Diquat No symptoms
Diquat No symptoms
Diquat Sore mouth
Diquat No symptoms
Diquat
diuron & glufosinate
N/A
ammonium
diuron & glufosinate
N/A
ammonium
Ferrous sulphate
Fluroxypyr, clopyralid,
Felt unwell
MCPA
Fluroxypyr, Clopyralid,
No symptoms
MCPA
Fluroxypyr, clopyralid, Swollen mouth, although symptoms
MCPA starting to ease.
Fluroxypyr, clopyralid,
Unwell
MCPA
Fluroxypyr, clopyralid,
Dizziness
MCPA
Glyphosate None
Glyphosate Irritated runny nose, nose bleed.
Glyphosate Skin on right foot was irritated.
Glyphosate Skin red and irritated
glyphosate None
Not described, but lady went to A
glyphosate
&E to be checked out.
glyphosate Rash
glyphosate The thumb was swollen and painful
glyphosate Rash
glyphosate Not known
User had a sore on her finger by
glyphosate her nail and wondered if it was
related to her use of the product?
glyphosate None
Blister on back of hand at the end
glyphosate of the second day after handling
weeds.
glyphosate Felt weary and muscles ached
glyphosate Tongue went numb
glyphosate None
Dermatitis and some swelling in
glyphosate
the foot.
Rash on face, neck and hands 10
glyphosate
days after use
glyphosate Irritation and pain in the eye
Initial stinging relieved after
glyphosate washing eye with water for 15
minutes
Glyphosate N/A
Caused irritation in cut. After
Glyphosate several days became large sore
and blister
Glyphosate N/A
Skin irritation on hands and spread
Glyphosate to feet. Request info to take to GP.
Posted MSDS
Glyphosate trimesium,
Vomiting, diarrhoea, rash
diruon
Glyphosate, diuron Swollen feet
Glyphosate-trimesium,
No symptoms
diuron
Imidacloprid Skin rash
Imidicloprid N/A
Imidicloprid N/A
Imidicloprid Skin blotching
MCPA and Dichlorprop-p Breathing difficulties
MCPA, Dichlorprop-p and
Upset stomach
Ferrous Sulphate
MCPA, mecoprop-P, ferrous
Flu-like symptoms
sulfate
MCPA, Mecoprop-P, ferrous
No symptoms
sulfate
MCPA, mecoprop-P, ferrous
Sickness and diarrhoea,
sulfate
MCPA, mecoprop-P,
No symptoms
Ferrous sulfate
MCPA, mecoprop-P, ferrous
Earache, sore throat
sulfate
MCPA, mecoprop-P, ferrous Sore throat, tongue, lips, lost sense
sulfate of taste
MCPA, Mecoprop-P,
Vomiting, diarrhoea, rash
Ferrous sulfate.
MCPA, mecoprop-P,
No symptoms
Ferrous sulphate
MCPA, mecoprop-P,
Ferrous sulphate
Metaldehyde N/A
Metaldehyde N/A
Metaldehyde No symptoms
Metaldehyde No symptoms
Metaldehyde No symptoms
Metaldehyde No symptoms
Metaldehyde Agitated, vomiting
Myclobutanil/Bifenthrin N/A
Hand developed hard scaly area,
Myclobutanil/Bifenthrin
slight burning sensation.
Paraquat, diquat None
Unknown, as patient was in A&E
paraquat, diquat
and hospital called us.
Unknown as contacted by
paraquat, diquat Newcastle A&E and patient's
condition confidential.
Paraquat, diquat, amitrole,
Eye stinging
diquat
Paraquat, diquat, amitrole,
No symptoms
simazine
Paraquat, diquat, amitrole,
No symptoms
simazine.
Lung problems, including vomiting
Propiconazole blood and detection of a spot on his
lungs.
Chest pains when laid down at
Pyrethrins
night
Rotenone No symptoms
Sulphur, fatty acids None
Sulphur, fatty acids No symptoms
Thiacloprid N/A
ases
Details of Incident
A farmer had splashed some of the substance in his eye some 20 minutes
previously. The doctor was calling for advice on treatment.
Off-Label Use on ornamentals
Flower-harvester. Crop was treated with Carbendazim, Chlorothalonil and
Azoystroblin (unknown brands) 10 days prior to harvest.
Caller phoned to say that her daughter had been suffering from a skin
condition and flu-like symptoms for the past two weeks and has recently
been admitted to the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. She
described the condition as having been caused by "some form of biological
warfare agent". The caller said that the hospital could not identify her
daughters illness as yet, and had placed pictures of her daughter's skin
condition on the web in the hope that it would be identified. The caller then
told me that she had spoken to a local farmer who provided her with the
labels from products which he had been using locally. The caller described
two of the products as having a black cross on an orange square. She
wanted to know if I could help with the identification of her daughter's
illness or if any of the products would cause the symptoms described.
Caller was picking daffodils. She is known to be very sensitive to what she
eats, etc. She has been doing piecework on the farm for a number of years
and always wears gloves.
The caller was dealing with a patient who had used the product in a
knapsack (even though the instructions indicated it should not be). The
sprayer had leaked and the person involved was now suffering some
symptoms. Could the product be the cause of the man's illness? The caller
had spoken to the Poisons Centre, but they could not help as they did not
have any information on the product.
Unloading chemical from lorry and 2x10L of product were leaking and went
over clothes and into boots.
Farmer had been splashed in the eye when using the product.
Farmer had been applying product on his farm over the weekend. Towards
the end of the weekend he began to feel unwell.
Pipe burst while spraying and splashed his face. Had to return to farm to
wash off. Within two hours flu like symptoms developed and not feeling
good. Can't get a doctors appointment until this afternoon.
1 week after spraying product caller developed cough and sore throat, not
helped by Lemsip. Has a doctors appointment this afternoon.
Feeling unwell since spraying with product. (Spot treatment 1 litre used on
8th and 9th June). Worried as he did not wear a respirator. Grower feeling
dizzy, off colour, loss of appetite. He did not have a sore throat. Been to
see local GP and he asked for more information as he did not know the
product very well
Follow up call. Linked to report in row 13
Another hospital contacted them about a patient who had ingested the
product. She had no reference material on the product.
0.75 l of the product spilt onto carpet in living room. Product had been
brought into living room to keep away from children. It had been knocked
over by dogs, probably no top on. Home owner had scrubbed the carpet
without protective clothing, was also concerned about pets, fumes, the
carpet, and what the product was for. Advised home owner to wash skin
several times with soap and water and advised they should see a GP or
visit A&E if concerned. Also advised to take the product label as that
would help the Doctor / hospital if needed. Owner asked about pets,
advised to wash their feet and take to the vet, if any concern also take the
label etc. Owner planned to remove carpet as it was unlikely that they
would be able to effectively remove 0.75 l of the product. Carpet should the
be disposed. Owner asked about washing it outside, I reminded them that
they would have to keep any washing water away form drains, streams etc.
Asked if the product would kill rushes said no.
Caller seeking advice after his son complained of feeling unwell. Son had
been helping to top up spray bottles with the product at his school in Castle
Court. The Spray Operators had been wearing masks but son had not. He
breathed in some vapours and began to feel poorly.
Incident occurred two weeks ago. Operator feeling unwell c.14 days after
spraying the product. Doctor did not think the incidents were related but
wanted sds to confirm.
Caller had used product the day before, and overnight suffered from
swelling on the back of left hand, it has subsequently reduced but wanted
to know if product responsible.
Caller called seeking advice after her friend, had contaminated herself with
product. The fumes had made her feel sick and she took her gloves off for
some reason. She then got some of the product on her hands which
became red and sore.
Farmer requesting medical advice following spraying his land with a
knapsack sprayer.
Farmer was spraying a field when a spray nozzle blocked. Tried to clear it
by blowing through it. Got some Reglone on his lips.
A schoolboy sprinkled some of the product over two girl pupils at a school.
No details given as to how he was in possession.
A contractor complaining of swollen knees and hands after working with the
product.
An employee of an ornamental production company was using the product
on primroses under the Long Term Arrangements for Extrapolation of Use.
Both primroses and the product are know sensitisers. The symptoms
occurred 8 weeks post-application of Shirlan. None of the employees were
wearing gloves when handling the plants.
An incident had been reported on a farm and one of the farmhands had
been trapped either under or in a tractor. The Farm manager was phoning
for an MSDS in case the farmhand had been exposed. He was just
preparing information if required by the emergency services, the Fire
Service were on the scene trying to free the farmhand.
Callers property surrounded by fields. Farmer applying a number of
products. Callers wife and son standing ~ 30 ft away as sprayer passed.
Within 20 mins all felt tingling on lips and nose. Sensation now passed.
Does not feel need to visit GP. Needed reassurance about possible long
term effects. All companies have been contacted by the caller. They have
all agreed to send msds for their products.
Caller found a bottle of the product in back of the kitchen cupboard - as it
was dusty she washed it- but did not open it -then felt tingling sensation in
her hands wanted to know if she had been contaminated or not and if so
what was the risk.
Child had access to undiluted product and may have consumed some
Splashed pesticide in his eye. Not clear if this was diluted or not
Some product splashed on legs whilst using.
Had used product previous day without mask or gloves
Had been spraying behind a wall and as he came out wind caught some
spray and he breathed it in
Accident with sprayer whilst using product. Some had gone in his right eye
Amenity contractors sprayed an area and the lady alleged a number of
people suffered from symptoms downwind of the spraying. She claimed the
smell lingered for 3 days. The second phone call related to skin rash and
asthma symptoms herself
caller had been spraying and inhaled some of diluted spray.
He sprayed with the product in the afternoon and had not knowingly come
into contact with the herbicide .
Spraying with knapsack sprayer which leaked onto his clothing
Local council have been spraying the streets.
No direct incident can be traced, but
caller suffers from Multiple Chemical Sensitisation Syndrome and claims to
react to minute quantities of numerous household and industrial chemicals.
The caller had spilt some of the product on his back whilst using it on the
8th of October
The caller was a farmer who had been using the product 10 days
previously. He suspected he had inhaled some dust from the product, two
or three days after he had used it, he developed a rash on the inside of his
mouth. He was calling for advice.
Yuasa Battery UK Ltd took delivery of 4 shipping containers containing
batteries, which had arrived at their Birmingham factory from Oman. Their
own operatives opened the containers to unload the cargo unaware that
the product had been placed inside them in Oman. The foil sachets
containing the Plates had been opened but the Plates had not been
removed from them and had possibly not evolved all their gas. These
plates were removed from the containers and placed outside, where they
caught fire (due to wet conditions). The four operatives were taken to
hospital and kept in overnight, however, their condition was not serious.
Farmer used Fazor – there was a wind speed 2.5 knots – neighbour claims
it crossed 6 meter margin and over 4 metre hedge. Claims tongue was
sore and raw. Told farmer that his neighbour should have nothing to worry
about – the product has no hazard warnings on the label and even if a
minute amount drifted next door was unlikely to cause harm. Did mention
that the neighbour should go to doctor if worried and we could send MSDS
to doc.
(linked to report in row 43) Neighbour had contacted farmer because he
had blood in his urine. Wanted assurance That it was nothing to do with
the product incident. Farmer requested we call neighbour. Neighbour did
not want to go to doctor and did not want to make a fuss.
Farmer had given caller on 17/07/2005 the labels for 3 products he had
been using locally (see above). Unclear if there was any contamination. If
there was any, was spray drift exposure not in course of job.
A group of boy scouts at a supervised camp of grass field. Field had been
recently sprayed with the product for weed control. One scout developed
an 'allergic skin reaction' during the period of the camp. Owner of field (who
was not the spray operator) wanted to know if there was any possibility of a
connection between the allergic reaction and herbicide.
Dust blew back into spray operators face when mixing into his mixing bowl
The subject was reported to have used the product among a number of
other products on a given day. Subject may have been a contractor, but not
confirmed. Subsequent to this use, the subject reported feeling unwell and
requested safety data sheet for each product that had been used, including
the product. Subject was understood to be on the way to seek medical
advice at time of enquiry and wanted safety data sheets to take with him.
While working in her greenhouse, caller was affected by a farmer spraying
the product. Symptoms trouble breathing, smell, taste and burning back of
tongue. Farmer contacted distributor.
Linked to report in row 50. The product was in tank mix with another
product. Caller responded to my message on ansaphone of 19.05.05
asking for an update.
Mother of 8 yr old who has ME and glandular fever telephoned because
she was convinced spraying the product on a neighbouring farm was the
cause of her daughter's illness
Using a knapsack containing 20% solution on grass and weeds about 8/9
hours ago. Thought he might have got some in his eyes and breathed
some in. Immediately washed himself with soap and water.
Someone had let off a smoke generator while they were inside a farm
building and woman had entered building.
Whilst walking in the country was splashed by a sprayer with the product in
the tank
Caller believes he might have got some of the product in his eye when
working on his seed drill several days ago.
Whilst spraying diluted product had soaked in to his clothes.
Not clear if he was applying product or handling treated seed but had
inhaled some vapours.
Exposed during handling of treated seed
Operator filled a new sprayer with a high concentration of the product at
about 2pm, placed on his back without any PPE to check for weight - later
noticed that back was wet and then noticed some irritation Initial
conversation relayed to Doctor to confirm that I could give no further
advice. Advised Operator to shower, soap and water, (he had taken a
bath), to visit GP if irritation continues or if still concerned. Offered MSDS
and explained product not mutagenic,carcinogenic, no reproductive effects
and unlikely to be absorbed by skin, also offered for our doctor to talk to
operator. Called again at midnight very concerned with continued irritation
and any potential side effects. Re-confirmed what said previously and
suggested he see his doctor. He said he would go to the 24 hour doctor,
suggested he take his label with him and the doctor should contact me if
any issues.
Small pipe on sprayer split as operator was travelling to a field . When he
reached a junction operator noticed the leak and repaired it, he then
continued on and to sprayed the field. When he had finished he noticed
that the fire, police and ambulance services were at the scene and had
closed the road because someone had reported the yellow stain. The fire
service were about to wash the road but the operator told them not to,
went to get a label but upon his return the fire officer told him that they had
consulted their “experts” and proceeded to wash the road. There were no
ditches or other water courses in the area, the run off would have ended up
in the ditch bottom
The storeman spilled some product and then decided to smell it. He sat
down afterwards but reported no major problems or side effects again.
s
Details of Incident
The caller told me that she had a patient that had been using this product
two days before the call. The patient was now complaining of an irate
chest, headaches, aching joints (flu like symptoms). The caller wanted to
know whether the product could have caused this.
Caller suffered skin rash. Another operator suffers from asthma and this
spray brought it on. Now both recovered fully. None of the operators using
Equity had any problems. These were the only ones on Dursban WG.
Subject was contaminated by drift from spray being applied to lawn of a
nearby garden. Spray operator declined to identify product being applied.
Subject approached HSE who suggested product probably MCPA or
mecoprop-p. Subject phoned us for further information on these two
chemicals.
The incident was reported in the Sheffield Star newspaper. The weedkiller
had been obtained from a council store and was stored in an unmarked
bottle in a fridge. The gentleman involved drank from the bottle, unaware
of what it contained. He was admitted to hospital following his collapse and
died three weeks later.
A family arrived at Crewe A & E on Sunday 5th June, Grandfather strongly
suspected poisoning by weedkiller.
Details of Incident
Left in warm car.
Caller was landscape gardener who used the product previous week on
client‟s lawn. Client now claiming she and her family were suffering ill
health and they thought product responsible.
Packet had split when caller was opening and he got powder in his face &
up his nose. Had washed the product off but wanted further information.
2 days previously caller had inhaled some of the product when opening the
sachet. Was concerned about long terms effect to his health
Caller had used the product previous day, and got some into a cut on his
hand. He had washed the affected area. He wanted to know if symptoms
related to incident
Caller had used product previous day, was now suffering diarrhoea and felt
unwell, was the product responsible
Caller had spilled product on table, though not on himself, but was
concerned of potential effects.
Caller had spilt product on himself while opening the packet, it had got in
his hair and on his clothes, not in his eyes but there was a faint taste of the
product.
Caller had used the product on 13th August. On the 19th August her
grandson had played on the treated area, the child was now unwell. Caller
wanted to know if product had caused his illness.
Caller‟s mother was opening product sachet when it ripped apart and dust
came out, which may have been inhaled and in contact with skin. Caller‟s
mother was taking shower to remove product
Caller‟s husband had used product 5 days before and got spray in face, he
washed his face immediately. Now on holiday in France, the gentleman had
just been admitted to hospital with various chest problems. The French
doctors required further information on the product.
Caller had got some product in eyes during use. He immediately washed
out his eyes, wanted to know of any health effects associated with the
product.
While disposing of empty bottle the label came of and stuck to caller‟s
finger, which subsequent became swollen. Caller wanted to know if
product had caused the swelling.
Caller had used the product few hours earlier, in breezy conditions.
Used product evening before - several hours later rash developed on torso.
Caller‟s spouse had used product round the house, on the furnishings as a
substitute flea spray. Caller wanted to know what the likely hazards and
risks were (and how to clean it off her furniture)
Caller had used the product 8 days before, and experienced problems with
the spray nozzle, resulting in product being splashed over her arms and
legs. The caller had washed off the product.
Caller used product previous day, while his wife was in the garden. They
think she may have inhaled some spray. Overnight she developed a large
swelling and her skin became red and blotchy. Caller was concerned that
the product had caused the symptoms.
Caller had eaten 4 grapes sprayed with product, worried about side effects
Caller had used the product to descale his kettle. He wanted to know if the
kettle would be safe to use.
Caller‟s 5-year-old son had sprayed product on fingers, then licked fingers.
Child‟s mouth had been washed out.
Caller had sprayed some weeds 10 days previously, may have got spray
on hands. Subsequently suffered a rash, became ill but now improving,
caller wanted to know if product may have been responsible, or was his
illness the result of chicken pox, which he had about a month ago.
Caller had got some spray into her eyes. She had already rinsed eye
thoroughly.
Caller‟s two-year-old son had sprayed himself with product, soaked into his
clothes and on his skin. Caller had changed the child‟s clothes and washed
his skin, wanted to know if product was dangerous
Caller‟s 2-yr-old daughter had sprayed product in her mouth, caller was at
hospital A&E, with child, had taken product with them
Caller had come into contact with spray when using the product. She had
rinsed mouth and washed hands and face, wanted more information as is
allergic to several things.
Caller was Sister from A&E Department, had patient who had consumed no
more that 400ml of product.
Child - Possible ingestion suspected .
Elderly adult - spilt product on floor and trod in some
Caller‟s colleagues had been unloading bags, one of which split and the
man had accidentally caught one in his mouth. He had drunk some water.
They had obtained a product SDS from the manufacturer.
Caller was shop worker who had been contacted by a customer who had
spilt the product on a mat the day before, she attempted to clean up the
spillage today, and believes she may have inhaled some of the vapours
Caller had treated lawn, then 2-year-old son dropped his dummy onto the
lawn, then put it back in his mouth. Caller wanted advice (child‟s mouth
had already been rinsed).
Caller‟s father had used product that morning, later the same afternoon he
stated to complain of a swollen mouth. He had used the product several
times before without problems. As far as the caller knew her father had not
spilt the product on his skin or clothes.
Caller had used product 9 days ago, and since been unwell, was
concerned product was responsible.
Caller had used product 2-3 days previously. This morning he felt dizzy and
wondered if product was responsible. Caller stated he was also on
medication, which had dizziness listed as a potential side effect, he wanted
to know if the product was responsible before he contacted his GP.
Caller had some diluted product in a container in the shed. His 4-year-old
son had got hold of the container and sprayed some into his mouth.
However, the caller did not think anything had been swallowed.
Caller had used product previous day, and since suffered from irritated,
runny nose. Caller did not think she had inhaled the product, but wanted
advice
Caller had got product on his feet earlier that day. Had washed left foot, but
not right (did not realise product had contacted right foot.).
Caller had got product on skin the previous day, but not washed off until
about 15 minutes later. Last night skin became red and irritated, although
effect had reduced by morning. Caller stated she had previously used
similar RTU products with no side effects.
2.5 yr old child had managed to get the bottle and sprayed his teeth with
the product.
Tamperproof seal broken and product squirted into face as attempted to
use.
Had sprayed product with legs and arms exposed. She was not aware of
product getting on her skin at the time
She had used the product not wearing gloves and had a cut on her thumb.
Whilst trying to adjust the spray gun had some spray on her trigger finger
The bottle had accidentally discharged in a car and some had been
ingested
None
Small child found by his mother with top off container and product spilt on
floor. He indicated he had some on his finger and had put it into his mouth
Had spilt a drop of the concentrate on the back of his hand and washed it
off immediately.
Had been clearing nettles and brambles by hand the next day
Spilled diluted product on legs, was wearing shorts. Had washed off
User had pesticide on finger, not wearing gloves and put finger into mouth
Had used the product in a broken garden sprayer and diluted spray went
into her mouth
Accidental spill. Did not wash off.
Used product in garden and subsequently pulled out weeds wearing
gloves. No known contact with product.
drift into eye whilst spraying
Diluted spray splashed into eye as he shook the container before inserting
sprayline
Adult - Inhalation of product while spraying
Adult - sprayed small amount into cut causing irritation.
Child - accidentally sprayed product in mouth.
Adult - 5 weeks previous sprayed glyphosate. Four days after spraying -
hand pulling weeds.
Caller had used 2 products the previous week, (12 May) Her 4 year old son
had become ill on the 16th May. Caller had taken child to GP, but only
mentioned using one of the products. Caller wanted to know if the products
were responsible for her son‟s illness
Caller used product previous day, wearing „flip-flop‟ sandals, got product on
feet. Did not wash off, concerned swelling may be due to contact with
product
Call from hospital A&E department, a 17-month-old child had been found in
garden with weedkiller round her face. Nurse was not sure of product
name as it was a very old bottle.
Adult - Skin rash - possible allergy after use of product
Accidentally got some in eye when spraying
Accidental spillage on hand
Adult - spray drift from product.
The subject inhaled the product whilst putting it into a spreader. The lady is
asthmatic and reported breathing difficulties after doing so. The breathing
difficulties didn‟t last very long, normal breathing resumed after a short rest
and use of an inhaler. A doctor was not consulted
a couple both had upset stomachs a week after applying the product to the
lawn. One was using the product and the other was standing in the garden
Caller had used product 5 days previously, since then been feeling „rough‟.
Wanted to know if product responsible
Caller‟s 2-year-old daughter had just eaten some of the product, although
had spat it back out. Child‟s mouth had already been rinsed
Caller had treated his lawn 5 days ago. 4 days ago caller‟s 9-month-old
son had suffered sickness and diarrhoea, wondered if product was
responsible, recalled some grass had been thrown round while child on
lawn.
Caller was nurse treating a 7-month-old girl who had ingested an unknown
amount of product 2 hours earlier
Caller treated lawn 2 days previously. His 2 sons (5 and 2 years old) are
now unwell. Children have been taken to doctors. Caller wanted to know if
product was responsible.
Caller used product 3 weeks earlier, and may have inhaled some of the
product. He was not concerned at the time, but has visited GP about
symptoms, and returning today. Could the product be responsible?
(acknowledged that had used any other chemical products as well.)
Caller had used 2 products the previous week, (12 May) Her 4 year old son
had become ill on the 16th May. Caller had taken child to GP, but only
mentioned using one of the products. Caller wanted to know if the products
were responsible for her son‟s illness.
Caller had treated his lawn 2 days previously. His 15-month-old son went
onto the treated area today, would he been ok.
Caller wanted advice on the toxicity of the product as his father was feeling
out of sorts and had used it last week.
Child - Ingestion suspected .
Child - Possible ingestion
Child age 15 months may have eaten pellets. Area was treated 2 weeks
ago, child put handful of soil from treated area into mouth. Not known if any
pellets got into mouth or were swallowed. There had been rainfall since the
product was applied.
Caller‟s 2-year old-niece had dropped ice-cream onto the pellets then ate
ice-cream. Caller thought she had ingested some of the products, wanted
to know if she would be alright.
Caller‟s one-year-old child may have ingested some of the product.
Caller had found his 2-year-old daughter with a pellet in her mouth. She
spat it out, Does not think she has swallowed any, but wanted further
advice
Caller was Sister from A&E department regarding a female patient who had
drunk 200ml of product that morning.
Spraying product - 3 yr daughter put some on finger and put finger in her
mouth.
Adult - used product 1 week previous. Got some liquid on hand
Caller had carried watering can containing solution with product, stumbled
and splashed liquid on himself. Had already washed the affected area
Male ingested a sachet of the product.
A male had ingested 2 sachets of the porduct and an unknown quantity of
paracetamol
Caller had treated garden previous evening. Later that night, her 12-yr-old
son stated he may have product in his eye. They rinsed his eye out, but he
suffered stinging overnight.
Caller had spilt product on her skin.
Caller‟s 2-year-old nephew had been crawling on area that had been
treated with the product last week. Caller was concerned that his nephew
could be harmed.
Caller had used product 2 weeks previously. Recently developed lung
problems, was due to see his GP today, and wanted confirmation whether
the product was responsible for his illness.
Caller had used product three days before, and inhaled a small amount.
She was now experiencing chest pains at night, was the product
responsible? There were no other symptoms and caller had used to
product for some years without any problems.
Call from shop, a customer had bought product previous day, tried to open
product while still in car, and got dust around the car and on himself.
Customer had gone back to shop to ask if product would harm him.
Caller‟s toddler got hold of product and may have sprayed himself. Caller
did not witness the incident, she had already removed clothing and
thoroughly washed face and hands.
Caller had got spray into his face/eyes when using the product. He had
washed his face and eyes.
Accidentally poured some on hand
Action Undertaken by Company
After establishing the product involved and the manufacturer (initially the company
name was given as Alpha Chemicals), I then confirmed the main ingredients -
propachlor and ethylene glycol and that the product was irritant. Based on the
information in the SDS, I advised that treatment should be given symptomatically. I
also advised that further irrigation of the eye be administered for several more
minutes and that if the patient had any lasting effects then the doctor should call back
and I would contact the manufacturer for further advice.
MSDS sent. Nufarm followed up next day and confirmed no further action required by
Nufarm. Supplier commented that an allergic reaction to plant material can sometimes
happen.
I told the caller that the products with the black cross on the orange background were
classed as irritant [or harmful]. I asked her if she had taken the labels to the hospital
and she said that the farmer had only given them to her today. I advised the caller
that the best course of action was to take the labels to the hospital and if needed I
would forward any or all of the SDS to them directly, provided I had them.
Spoke to the Farm Manager about hygiene practices on farm. He stated that there
were always supplies of fresh gloves including in the washrooms. He was going to re-
enforce the message of removing gloves and washing hands both before and after
going to toilet and putting on fresh gloves.
I checked the database and found two entries under this name. I confirmed the
correct product and found the SDS. I offered to send the SDS to the caller and he
said he would like to see it. I suggested that he call the Poisons Centre again, this
time with the name of the active ingredient.
None taken
Farmer was looking for information on what to do. He was told to rinse the eye with
clean water for at least 15 minutes and report to local casualty department to seek
further medical attention.
None taken
None taken
Doctor said it was unlikely to be the product and prescribed anti-biotics.
Went through the msds and concluded symptoms were unlikely to be those caused
by the product as he did not have a sore throat. I Phone caller later in the week to see
if he is still unwell.
Operator went to see GP he was feeling ill for one week, but is fine now.
No follow up proposed.
No further action required
No further action required
Advised that may be an allergic reaction and that he should seek medical advice so
the affected area can be checked visually.
The injured party attended hospital and was discharged after treatment for mild
caustic burns.
No
Company doctor spoke to patient's doctor to give advice on best way to treat.
Expected to take about 10 days to heal. Followed up on 8th September, blisters
healed.
Isolated incident due to abuse. No reported effect on the 2 affected schoolgirls.
Company explained that the product was a known sensitiser and that we could not
condone this course of action. The company offered to arrange a sensitisation test to
be carried out under medical supervision. This was declined. The patient is now
wearing gloves when handling the primroses and is avoiding glasshouses where the
product has been sprayed to see if the reaction is to the primroses. As a result of this
incident the Company has introduced improved "safety measures" ensuring people
wash their hands, wear gloves and tie their hair back, when working with the plants.
No
No further action required.
Caller contacted NCEC first and was then contacted by company retained doctor,
who talked through the situation and reassured her that symptoms could occur with
direct ingestion but should not be cause for concern.
Called NCEC to ask what to do. Satisfied no symptoms. Was advised to see his GP if
any developed
User contacted NCEC who reassured product was not irritant or toxic, but she should
see her GP if symptoms did not subside.
Caller contacted NCEC who suggested symptoms unlikely from product using SDS,
but see GP to make sure.
Caller phoned NCEC who gave him the SDS and informed him effects were unlikely
to be caused by spray and to see his doctor if symptoms persist.
Caller had first contacted NHS Direct who had given him wrong information, he then
called NCEC who advised him of the product's non-irritancy and reassured no long
term effects as he had acted correctly in washing out his eye. Concerning that NHS
Direct told caller the product might cause acid, corneal burns, which is untrue.
An MSDS was offered and reassurance that the product had no smell. Company
doctor contacted after second phonecall was abusive and an individual letter was
sent. The lady changed her allegations several times.
Caller had contacted NCEC who gave her information from SDS that product was not
toxic or irritant and advised her to drink some water. She was advised to see her GP if
the tingling sensation did not pass.
Suggested he contact his doctor if symptoms continue and sent MSDS. Reassured
unlikely to be connected with the product.
Called NCEC to check what should be done to decontaminate. Was given advice to
remove clothing and wash. No symptoms reported
Company retained doctor telephoned and discussed symptoms and gave advice.
Local Authority are aware and should advise prior to spraying so she can stay
indoors.
Company Doctor contacted, who telephoned the caller and offered advice.
Having established how long ago the exposure was, I told him I could not offer any
other advice, other than to visit his doctor to be examined and to seek treatment for
his symptoms. I also told him that although the product was described as mildly
irritant, there was nothing obviously to suggest the product had definitely cause the
symptoms. However, I suggested he passed on our telephone number to the doctor,
so that he or she could speak to us about the product and assess whether it had
caused his symptoms.
The HSE were informed and began an investigation into this incident.
Spoke with farmer. He had spoken with neighbour and passed on our information
regarding the product. Farmer didn't think the neighbour would be going to the doctor
but gave him our details in case he had any further queries.
Phoned neighbour and assured him that the product would not have caused this
problem especially so long after the event. No further action required.
NCEC told caller it was unlikely that the product had caused the problem and advised
her to take labels and Safety Data Sheet to the hospital. No further action. Case
closed.
Posted MSDS on the product to enquirer.
Enquirer requested safety data sheet for each product that had been used prior to
feeling unwell. There was no indication that exposure to the product was the specific
source of the symptoms. The safety data sheet for the product was faxed
immediately, and the approval holder asked to be
kept informed if further information was needed, or if further action was necessary.
There was no further contact from the enquirer.
No further contact
Sent a letter and fact sheets on the product, together with a copy of the Green Code
of Practice for spraying to explain how farmers should carry out spraying. There was
only anecdotal association between the child's illness and any contact with the
product.
Advice and reassurance given and told if he did start to suffer from any symptoms he
should seek medical attention. Operator was wearing gloves and coveralls.
Patient spoken to on 11th August and she was fully recovered
Advice provided: - If the caller develops any reaction then discuss with his Doctor.
We would not expect this exposure to the product to give any cause for concern.
He is now going to visit casualty with a copy of the safety data sheet.
Caller contacted NCEC to see what precautions he should take. Was given details
from SDS and told there should be no symptoms as he had washed skin and clothes
immediately.
He had contacted his own GP but was waiting for a reply. In the meantime the caller
wanted some advice from a panel member.
Operator phoned back 9:30am on 26th , 24 hour doctor advised bicarbonate of soda
which had worked. Operator no longer concerned. No further action required.
Operator asked if there was anything else he could do. I explained that the product
was dangerous to aquatic life and that it should be kept out of any water courses etc
and that the preferred method of clean up would be to absorb with sand then sweep
up and dispose of properly. I offered the MSDS but he already had one. Given that
the leak was only a small one and that it was already diluted in the tank and that there
were no water courses involved I said that there was probably little more that could
be done. I said that if he had any further questions or contact from the authorities then
he should contact us.
Asked if any problems, reported no.
Was any treatment required?
Not Known
None required this was for information only.
No
Incident was fatal
Urine test conducted, test negative,
Action Undertaken by Company
wanted to know of any harmful effects - advice supplied
Advised of potential hazards, suggested client goes to GP, and doctor could contact
NCEC for further information if required.
Told product was harmful by ingestion, but would need to ingest significant amount.
Caller advised not got much in his mouth, mainly up his nose. Asked if got any in his
eye, replied no, as wears glasses. Advised had taken correct action, but if was
worried, or experienced any symptoms to contact his GP and mention the product.
The GP could contact NCEC if required.
Advised that the product may cause irritation to the nose and throat, so if the
symptoms returned to visit his GP, taking the pack with him. Advised that a one off
exposure of a limited amount was unlikely to cause long term health problems.
Advised that it was unlikely to cause reaction, however as he was feeling unwell
should consider consulting his GP, taking the product with him. The GP could contact
NCEC for further product details if required.
Advised it was unlikely the product would cause the symptoms described. Suggested
that consults GP as a precaution.
Gave relevant information from Safety data sheet.
Advised to remove contaminated clothing, and wash himself/hair with soap and water.
Suggested takes care to prevent and dissolved product entering his eyes or being
ingested while washing. Stated that the contaminated clothes should be washed
before reuse.
Advised that given the time gap between application of the product and the child
entering the treated area it was very unlikely that the product was responsible for his
illness. Child had already seen the Doctor, and caller asked if she should advise
doctor of potential contact with product. Advised that if the child needed to see the
doctor again she could mention it to him, but repeated that it was very unlikely that the
child had come into contact with sufficient amounts of the product to cause the illness.
Advised that the product may cause irritation to nose and throat if inhaled, and to
rinse mouth with plenty of water and to drink a little. If symptoms develop to seek
medical attention taking the product to the GP.
The SDS indicated that active ingredient suppliers should be called when dealing with
medical requests on paraquat. They were contacted and arranged for them to call the
hospital. Also sent an SDS through to the hospital, Contacted caller and explained
course of action taken, she confirmed that the English doctors had already been in
contact.
Advised was a fairly low hazard product, and that had taken correct action. If he does
suffer eye irritation he should consult his GP, taking the product with him, his GP
could contact NCEC for further information if required.
Advised that the product was unlikely to be responsible for swelling. Caller then asked
if the product had reacted with the glue on the label to cause the reaction. Told that
as did not know composition of glue could not say. Possible that he was sensitive to
the product, advised to seek medical advice, and if required NCEC could fax SDS to
GP.
Advised to rinse mouth and wash any exposed skin. Caller replied that she had
already done so. Advised product of low toxicity, but she may be sensitive to
ingredients, if symptoms persist to contact her GP who could contact NCEC if
required.
Visited GP - No further contact
Advised to wash furniture with warm soapy water, followed by clean water. Advised if
either caller or spouse felt ill to seek medical attention and tell GP of contact with the
product, also monitor any pets.
Caller taking antihistamine. Advised it was unlikely the product was responsible, due
to the time lapse between the incident and development of rash. Recommended she
visit her GP, and mention the incident. The GP could contact NCEC for further
product details if required.
Checked product SDS, advised highly unlikely the product caused the symptoms
described. Advised to seek medical assistance.
Caller went before could offer advice, tried to call back (9 times) and left messages on
answer phones but was unable to contact.
Advised not to use the kettle and dispose of it safely.
Advised had taken correct course of action, given age of child should seek medical
advice. (subsequent call received by A&E, Warwickshire hospital, boy checked and
discharged.)
Advised that although product may be skin irritant, was not a skin sensitiser. As had
only be exposed to product for short time unlikely product was responsible for his
problems. Advised if still concerned to visit his GP.
Advised to consult doctor, and he was welcome to contact NCEC for further product
information if required.
Advised to also rinse the child‟s mouth with water. Explained that the product should
not cause problems unless significant quantities are ingested, but the child should be
monitored.
Advised when speak to doctor, she could give him NCEC number to call for further
information and SDS if required.
Advised that the product is not classified as hazardous and that she had followed
correct procedure. However, given her allergies suggested that she contact her GP
and tell him what happened, her GP could contact NCEC for further information if
required.
SDS faxed to hospital, told Sister that she could call back if further assistance was
required.
Wanted general advice
General advice supplied.
Advised that swallowing one granule should not result in any harmful effects.
However, if the man started to suffer any ill effect, he should seek medical advice,
taking the SDS with him.
Advised to get fresh air, if she still feels unwell after a few hours she should seek
medical attention and take details of the product to the doctor. Advised how to clean
up spillage, and ensure ventilation while cleaning.
Advised to give the child water to drink, then seek medical attention. If she did not
wish to see GP should monitor child‟s behaviour and in the event of any change seek
medical attention immediately, taking the product with her.
Advised to rinse out his mouth and rinse the skin around his mouth to remove traces
of any product. If still uncomfortable advised to contact GP, who could contact NCEC
if they required further information on the product.
Advised if he was concerned or continued to feel unwell he should see his doctor,
taking pack with him. His GP could contact NCEC for further information on the
product if required.
Advised that it was unlikely the product was responsible, and suggested he speak to
his GP about the medication. He could mention contact with the product with his GP,
who could contact NCEC for further information if required.
Advised to rinse child‟s mouth thoroughly. If the child experienced any symptoms then
he should seek medical advice.
Advised that product had low toxicity, although possible she was sensitive to it.
Advised to see her GP, taking the product with her. Her GP could contact NCEC for
further product details if required.
Advised product was not classified as hazardous, unlikely to cause irritation, if
irritation continues to visit his GP, informing doctor of exposure to product.
Advised that the product was not classified as an irritant, but may cause skin reaction.
Suggested monitor skin, and if did not continue to improve of got worse, to contact
her GP, also suggested that she cover her skin if using the product again, and wash
off any splashes immediately in future.
Caller's mother phoned the NCEC for advice as to how to decontaminate. Was given
advice and reassured from the SDS that no ill effects were likely, but if symptoms
occurred to go to GP with pack
Call logged by NCEC. Lady was claiming compensation for time spent in A&E from
retailer
Call referred to NCEC, who gave her SDS information and said it was unlikely to be
caused by the product, but advised her to show pack to GP. The lady had also been
using a paint product on the same day and it is more likely this could have caused the
reaction.
Call transferred to NCEC who advised product was unlikely to cause symptoms
described. Company-retained doctor contacted caller and reassured her on the safety
of the product and sent the SDS to her by post to show her nurse.
Company retained doctor discussed with caller. Caller was satisfied there was no long
term effect and that rash caused by leaking spray and friction of finger on trigger
The patient's doctor called NCEC who faxed SDS to give him the details of
composition he requested.
Caller referred to NCEC, who advised from SDS. Caller accepted sore finger not likely
to be related to product use.
Call referred to NCEC at the time of incident. Advice given on dealing with immediate
situation from SDS. Advised no symptoms likely but if any developed to go to GP with
pack
Caller had phoned NCEC to check if blister could have been caused by the pesticide.
Informed from SDS that not likely as product was non-irritant. Caller agreed
symptoms much more likely to have been caused by the nettles and brambles he
handled the same day.
Caller referred to NCEC who advised from SDS that his symptoms were not likely to
be connected with his spraying 2 weeks ago.
Caller rang NCEC, who gave information from SDS and suggested the product was
not toxic & advised to see GP and he could speak to NCEC if symptoms did not go
away. No further calls received
Caller had been transferred to NCEC for advice. She was advised from the SDS that
there should be no symptoms as the product was not hazardous and she had washed
it out immediately. Advised to see GP if any symptoms appear.
Company doctor discussed symptoms. Swelling may be connected with a knee
replacement
Company doctor discussed case. Not thought to be related to product.
Company doctor contacted and established the lady suffered from hay fever and the
pollen count was high at the time of spraying. This was accepted as the most likely
initial cause of the eye irritation.
NCEC advised on washing out procedure. Caller was not happy about the pack and
felt it was faulty. but his symptoms relieved after washing eyes.
Requested general advice
General advice supplied suggested visit to GP if symptoms persisted.
General advice supplied, suggested visit to GP if any symptoms develop.
General advice supplied, GP to contact us if he had any questions. Suggested that
she took sample of weeds to GP as could have allergic reaction to certain plants.
Advised to contact GP again, and tell him of all the products that had been used. Her
GP was welcome to contact NCEC for further information on any of the products. See
also previous report
Advised that the product contained a chemical which may cause an allergic reaction,
suggested she obtain medical advice for the swelling.
Discussed likely products, opted for worst case scenario. Advised of product
classification, and faxed full SDS to hospital.
Requested general advice
Requested general advice
Requested general advice
Requested general advice
None taken
Considered view was that the upset stomachs weren't linked to the product
Advised that would not expect such symptoms, unless large amount had been
ingested. Suggested he contact his GP, and that his GP could contact NCEC for
further product information if required.
Advised that should not be a problem unless a large quantity ingested, but given age
of child should be taken to GP, with the pack, as a precaution. The GP could contact
NCEC for further information if required.
Caller stated his wife was taking child to GP. Advised it was unlikely product was
responsible, but GP could contact NCEC if he required further product information.
Advised of product toxicity from SDS. Copy of SDS faxed to the hospital.
Advised that the product is unlikely to have caused the ailments that the children are
suffering.
Suggested that he should tell doctor of contact with product when visits him later
today, and GP could contact NCEC for further details if required.
Advised to contact GP again, and tell him of all the products that had been used. Her
GP was welcome to contact NCEC for further information on any of the products. See
also following report
Asked if child had handled or swallowed any of the product. Caller said no. Asked if
the boy had symptoms like redness of skin. Caller said no. Advised that product is of
low toxicity, but if any symptoms appear the caller should take the child to his GP,
with the packet. The GP could contact NCEC if required.
Advised that the product was not toxic, and that his father would have needed to
ingest a huge amount of the product before any health effects would be noticed.
Suggested that his father visit the doctor, taking the product. The GP could contact
NCEC if required.
N/A
Requested general advice
Advised caller to check child‟s mouth for traces of blue, (nothing found). Advised
caller of symptoms of metaldehyde poisoning, Although unlikely that the child has
ingested significant quantity of the product caller was advised to take child to GP or
A&E that day, taking the packet with them.
Advised that the product could be harmful if ingested, and should take the child to
casualty, together with the product pack. The doctors could contact NCEC for SDS,
further information.
Advised that in all cases involving children where the amount ingested was unknown
should seek medical attention, either from GP or A&E, taking pack with them.
Medical staff could contact NCEC for further product information if required.
Advised to rinse child‟s mouth, if there is any doubt that anything had been swallowed
child should be taken to doctor or hospital.
SDS faxed to hospital, including „confidential‟ formulation details to aid calculation
dose v. bodyweight. Advised could call back if further info required. Due to serious
nature of incident, the company was also immediately notified. NB: Follow up
received Feb 2006. Patient made a successful recovery and no long term sequelae
are anticipated
Requested general advice
General advice supplied advised GP visit if in discomfort
Advised to monitor the area where he had been splashed, and to consult a doctor if
any reaction was observed.
18th August followed up with the hospital and patient had been released.
Patient transferred from Casualty to Psychiatric ward. Plasma analysis done by
Syngenta for the hospital. All relevant medical information passed by Company
doctor to Newcastle A & E doctor. This was an attempted suicide.
Suggested that they wash out eye for a further 15 minutes, then seek medical
assistance as a precaution due to the sensitive nature of the eye, (whether the
product was responsible or not).
Advised to wash area thoroughly with warm soapy water.
Having confirmed that the child had not ingested any treated grass or plant leaves,
advised that the product would not cause harm to the child.
Advised that the product was not classified, and was of low toxicity, therefore unlikely
to be cause of his illness. If required the SDS could be faxed to his GP on request.
After checking the SDS advised unlikely the product had caused the symptoms.
Advised to contact her GP.
Advised that product is harmful by ingestion and may irritate skin, however customer
did not seem to have any symptoms at this stage. Advised if did suffer any reaction
should seek medical attention and take product with him
Advised that the product is not hazardous, and that she had taken suitable action.
Advised to wash all exposed skin, and to rinse eyes for at least 15 minutes. If he
experienced any irritation to contact his GP
Requested general advice
