Comflict Management

Description

Comflict Management document sample

Shared by: fyk11843

Tags

conflict resolution, Conflict Management, 저작권 침해, mental models, the Connection, CU Sports, summer specials, Measure for Measure, The Taming of the Shrew, The Fantasticks

Stats

views:: 9
posted:: 1/5/2011
language:: English
pages:: 81

Public Domain

Document Sample

REGULAR AGENDA
CITY COMMISSION, CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
WEDNESDAY, JUNE 18, 2008 1:30 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. PRESENTATIONS AND REPORTS

A. Recognition of Hallandale Beach Students Receiving Scholarships from the
Hallandale Beach Community Council Scholarship Fund Program

B. Presentation by Dr. Brenda Snipes, Broward County Supervisor of Elections,
Regarding the New Voting Equipment

C. Parks and Recreation Summary Report

D. Presentation of the 2008 Beautification Incentive Awards

TO BE HEARD AT 6:30 PM

5. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (to be heard at 1:30 P.M.)

6. CITY BUSINESS (Voting on Items Deferred to Evening Consent Agenda to be Heard at
7:15 P.M.)

A. Presentation of the Health Intervention Through Targeted Services (HITS) Program
(Presented by Memorial Hospital)(Staff: Director, Human Services)(see backup)

TO BE HEARD AT 3:00 P.M.

B. A Resolution of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Authorizing an Application
for a Public Transit Service Development Grant under FDOT's Discretionary Grant
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 2

Program for the Purpose of Receiving Funds for the Expansion of the City's
Minibus Operations (Staff: Director, Public Works, Utilities and Engineering)(see
backup) CAD #026/06

C. Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-108, Cooperative Purchasing, Request
Authorization to Award Bid #07-07-0828, Florida Sheriffs Association Bid, for a
2008 Pierce Impel HDR Pumper, to Lowest, Responsive, Responsible Bidder
Pierce Manufacturing, Inc. in the Amount of $445,540.14. (Staff: Fire Chief)(see
backup)

D. Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-104, Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances,
Authorize the Award of RFP #FY 2007-008-001, Banking Services, to City National
Bank. (Staff: Director, Finance) (see backup) CR #10/07

TO BE HEARD AT 7:20 P.M.

E. Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate and Fire Assessment Rate for
Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager to Sign the Certificate of
Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the Tentative Millage and Fire
Assessment Rates (Staff: Director, Finance)(see backup)

F. Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate for the Golden Isles Safe
Neighborhood District for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager to
Sign the Certificate of Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the
Tentative Millage Rate (Staff: Director, Finance)(see backup)

G. Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate for the Three Islands Safe
Neighborhood District for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager to
Sign the Certificate of Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the
Tentative Millage Rate (Staff: Director, Finance)(see backup)

H. Discussion of the Creation of an Advisory Committee for the Community
Redevelopment Agency (CRA) (Mayor Cooper)(See backup)

I. Discussion of the Evaluation of SE 2nd Street (Mayor Cooper)(See backup)

7. MONTHLY REPORTS

8. COMMISSIONER REPORTS

9. OTHER

10. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION (to be heard at 7:00 P.M.)

11. CONSENT AGENDA (to be heard at 7:15 P.M.)

A. Voting on City Business Items Previously Discussed
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 3

B. Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-107(6), Bids and Contracts from other Entities,
Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances, Request Authorization to Award Florida
Highway Products, Inc. a Contract in the amount of $125,622 for the
MicroSurfacing of NE 14th Avenue and Layne Boulevard Using Contract Prices
from Collier County, Florida Bid #06-3920 "Annual Road Micro-Surfacing
Contract" and Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-107(5), Unique Circumstances,
Request Authorization to Award Florida Highway Products, Inc. a Contract in the
amount of $485,124 Using Prior Contract Prices for the Full Depth Reclamation of
Golden Isles Drive Extended to Hallandale Beach by Florida Highway Products,
Inc. for the Removal of Asphalt and Reconstruction Using Hot Asphalt and
Stripping of the Swale Area of N.E. 14th Avenue and the Removal of Existing
Curbing and Installation of New Curbing and Stripping on Layne Boulevard.
(Staff: Director, Public Works, Utilities & Engineering)(see backup)

C. Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-104, Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances,
Authorize the Award of RFP # FY 2007-2008-003 Audio Visual Upgrade System
City Commission Chambers to AVI-SPL in an Amount not to Exceed $64,000(Staff:
City Clerk/Director, General Services)(see backup) AR #054/07

12. PUBLIC HEARINGS (to be heard at 7:30 P.M.)

A. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Approving a Change of
Land Use from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density-2 for the
Proposed Project Referred to as “Park Central”, on the Property Legally Described
as Lots 1 Through 22 of Block 4, Lots 1 Through 22 Block 5 and Lots 1 through 18
Block 6 of Hollywood Pines Estates, According to the Plat thereof, as recorded in
Plat Book 6 at Page 41, of the Public Records of Broward County, Florida. (Second
Reading) (This Ordinance is a result of Application # 35-07-PA by Hallandale Park
Central, LLC) (Staff: Director, Development Services Department) (See backup)

(The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this item (5-1) (Cooper No)
on October 31, 2007.)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.B THROUGH
#12.H.

B. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Approving the Change of
Zoning from “RM-18“ to “RM-HD2”, for the Proposed Project Referred to as “Park
Central”, on the Property Legally Described as Lots 1 Through 22 of Block 4, Lots
1 Through 22 Block 5 and Lots 1 Through 18 Block 6 of Hollywood Pines Estates,
According to the Plat Thereof, as Recorded in Plat Book 6 at Page 41, of the Public
Records of Broward County, Florida. (Second Reading) (This Ordinance is a result
of Application # 32-06-Z by Hallandale Park Central, LLC) (Staff: Director,
Development Services Department) (See backup for item #12.A.)

(Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this item (3-2)(Cooper and Butler
No) on March 26, 2008.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 4

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A THROUGH
#12.H.

C. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Applying the Planned
Development Overlay District to the Hallandale Park Central Project Located at
301 North Federal Highway/507 NE 4th Street; Providing for Comflict, Severability
and an Effective Date.The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of
this item (5-1) (Cooper No.) on October 31, 2007. (Second Reading) (This
Ordinance is a result of Application # 32-06-Z by Hallandale Park Central, LLC)
(Staff: Director, Development Services Department)(See backup for item #12.A.)

(Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of this item 3-2 (Cooper and Butler
No) on March 26, 2008.

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A. THROUGH
#12.H.

D. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Vacating Certain Portions
of NE 4th Street and NE 4th Avenue and Adjacent Alleyways within the Hollywood
Pines Estates Subdivision Blocks 4, 5 & 6 Generally Located at 301 North Federal
Highway/507 NE 4th Street; Provinding for Conflict, Severability, and an Effective
Date.(Second Reading) (This Ordinance is a result of Application # 31-07-RV by
Hallandale Park Central, LLC) (Staff: Director, Development Services Department)
(See backup for item #12.A.)
)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A. THROUGH
#12.H.

E. Application #32-07-DB for Major Development Review Approval Pursuant to
Section 32-782 of the Zoning and Land Development Code in order to Build a
Mixed-Use Commercial/Residential Building at the Property located at 301 N.
Federal Highway. (Staff: Director, Development Services) (See backup)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A THROUGH
#12.H.

F. Application #39-07-CU for a Conditional Use Permit Pursuant to Section 32-
176(d)(2) of the Zoning and Land Development Code in order to Build a Mixed Use
Commercial/Residential Building at the Property Located at 301 N. Federal
Highway. (Staff: Director, Development Services) (See backup for item #12.E.)

(Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval 3-2 (Cooper and Butler - No) on
March 26, 2008.)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A. THROUGH
#12.H.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 5

G. A Resolution of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, to Replat the 7.44 Acre
parcel located at 301 N. Federal Highway. (Staff: Director, Development Services)
(This Resolution is as a result of Application #40-07-P by Hallandale Park Central,
LLC) (See backup for item #12.E.)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A. THROUGH
#12.H.

H. A Resolution of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Assigning 257 Residential
Flexibility Units to the Hallandale Park Central Project. The Planning and Zoning
Board recommended approval of this item (5-1) (Cooper No.)(Staff: Director,
Development Services) (This Resolution is a result of Application #35-07-PA by
Hallandale Park Central, LLC)) (See backup for item #12.E.)

THIS ITEM IS TO BE HEARD IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITEMS #12.A THROUGH
#12.H.

I. Application #64-07-DB by 600 Hallandale, LLC for Major Development Review
Approval Pursuant to Section 32-782 of the Zoning and Land Development Code
in order to construct a five story commercial building containing 320,000 square
feet of retail, 28,000 square feet of restaurants and a 749 seat movie theatre for a
total of 380,000 square feet in area at the property located at 600 East Hallandale
Beach Boulevard.(Staff: Director, Development Services) (See backup)

J. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Creating Article VII,
Inclusive of Sections 28-226 Through 28-230, of Chapter 28, Traffic and Motor
Vehicles, and Boats, Article VII Automated Enforcement of Certain Traffic
Violations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Hallandale Beach, Requiring
Adherence to Red Light Traffic Control Signals; Requiring a Motor Vehicle Owner
to Pay a Civil Fee for a Motor Vehicle that Runs a Red Light; Allowing Traffic
Enforcement Photographic Systems to Record Violations of Red Light Traffic
Control Signals; Providing for Issuance of Civil Notices of Code Violation for Such
Violations; Providing for a Method for the Motor Vehicle Owner to Appeal a Notice
of Code Violation; Providing for Severability; Providing for Repeal of Conflicting
Ordinances; Providing an Effective Date. (Second Reading)(Staff: Police
Chief)(see backup)CAD# 006/07

K. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Repealing City of
Hallandale Beach Ordinance 2008-03; Enacting Section 2-40 of the City of
Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances to Provide for the Appointment of Two
Commissioners to the City of Hallandale Beach Police Officers' and Firefighters'
Board of Trustees; Providing for Conflicts; and Severability; Providing for an
Effective Date. (Second Reading)(City Attorney)(see backup) CAD #002/07

L. An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Amending the City Code of
Ordinance, Chapter 2, Administration, Article II "City Commission", Section 2-32
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 6

"Boards"; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for Severability; and Providing for an
Effective date (First Reading)(Staff: City Clerk/General Services Director)(see
backup) CAD #018/07
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 7

4D. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: May 29, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: William Brant, P.E., Director, Public Works, Utilities and Engineering

SUBJECT: 2008 Beautification Award

PURPOSE

Present awards to residents whose properties have been selected by the Beautification Board
as outstanding in regards to landscaping and overall aesthetic looks.

BACKGROUND

In October of 1993, the Commission approved an awards program to recognize major
landscaping beautification improvements within our community. During this meeting, the
Commission directed the Beautification Advisory Board to annually select properties with
outstanding improvements in the area of facade treatment, renovations, and landscaping.

DISCUSSION

The Hallandale Beach Beautification Advisory Board works diligently in selecting award
nominees. The Board recommends that awards be given to seventeen (17) recipients.

This year's recipients will receive the following:

Gold Award

1. Plaque
2. Beautification Shirt
3. Plant
4. Yard Sign

Honorable Mention

1. Small plaque
2. Beautification shirt
3. Plant

Staff will hold a reception for award winners at 6:00 p.m. Staff is therefore requesting the
awards presentation be given a time certain for 6:30 p.m.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 8

RECOMMENDATION

Staff respectfully requests this item be placed on the June 18, 2008 Commission Agenda, for
presentation of awards by the Commission to the 2008 Beautification Incentive Awards
recipients.

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 9

6A. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 3, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Marian McCann-Colliee, Director, Human Services Department

SUBJECT: Presentation of HITS Program by Memorial Hospital

PURPOSE:

The City Commission receive a report and recommendation regarding the Health Intervention
Through Targeted Services (HITS) Program, implemented in the Palms of Hallandale Beach
portion of the City.

BACKGROUND:

The purpose of the HITS project is to reduce the number of medically uninsured residents who
do not have health care coverage. This project began in November 2007. Staff of the City and
Memorial met before starting the project to decide on the targeted area and the Northwest
Quadrant was chosen. This area of the city was selected in order to complement the Palms of
Hallandale Beach, Weed and Seed Initiative. The project initially designated ten blocks where
there would be a concentration of services in the Palms with inclusion of the Hepburn Center,
Chaves Lakes Apartments and Foster Park. In addition some other key locations (Eagles
Wings, BF James Park, Ebenezer Baptist Church) were included to maximize outreach to the
public. The Hepburn Center also served as the host site for the Coordinator and Outreach staff
from Memorial to have a local office. Based on the positive response from residents, staff and
the project outcomes it is evident that HITS was a successful collaboration of the City and
Memorial Healthcare Systems.

DISCUSSION

The following information is a summary of the project:

 Palms of Hallandale Beach HITS was a six month project from November 1, 2007 to
April 30, 2008 that targeted a ten block section of the City to improve access to health
care services.

 Services Included:
► Door to door surveying (514 households).
► In home intake assessments to maximize completion of
paperwork
► Mobile Health Unit onsite twice per week that alternated
locations between the Hepburn Center and Chaves Lakes
Apartment Complex. This included a separate Mobile Unit
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 10

for Adults and Pediatric that was staffed with doctors and nurses.
► Six Health Fairs held throughout the Palms.
► Twelve Lectures/Workshops held for youth, teens, adults
and seniors that focused on issues of importance to their
health.

 Project Outcomes

► 573 individuals assessed for health insurance
► 350 or 61% were actual Hallandale residents
► 27% of the Hallandale residents were from the targeted area
► 48.2% of the 573 were uninsured
► 6.3% of uninsured completed the process and are approved*
for Primary Center Care (PCC).
► 2% of uninsured qualified for Medicaid
► Less then 1% of individuals were non-compliant
*It should be noted that several individuals/families cases are still pending
approval. Families who qualified for Florida KidCare were also assisted with their
application process.

 Additional Services

► Pediatric Unit - Child physicals, immunizations, sickle cell
testing, Child-Identification
► Adult Unit - blood pressure and cholesterol checks, Flu and
Pneumonia and tetanus shots, HIV testing

The level of success of this project could not have been accomplished without the willingness of
each partner to work in collaboration for the community. In addition to the Human Services
Department engagement in this collaboration, the City‟s Fire Department also provided
additional healthcare support at many of the Health Fairs. The project also received assistance
from South Broward Healthy Families Program, Broward County Health Department and local
churches.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the project be continued in the Southwest Quadrant of the City.

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 11

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 12

6B. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 3, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: William Brant P.E., Director, Public Works, Utilities & Engineering

SUBJECT: FDOT Discretionary Grant – Minibus Operations – Route No 4

PURPOSE

The purpose is to request that the Commission adopt a Resolution authorizing an application for
a Florida Department of Transportation Discretionary Grant. The grant would provide funding to
assist in the implementation of a new minibus route.

BACKGROUND

Each year the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) makes available to municipalities
and other public entities several different types of grants through its Discretionary Grant
Program. Among the specific grants offered is the Public Transit Service Development
Program, which provides initial state funding for new transit services.

Next fiscal year the City purposes to expand its minibus operations to include a fourth route.
This new route will service an area of Fashion Row that is currently not reached by the existing
routes. In addition, the establishment of Route No. 4 will help reduce the headway on Route
No. 2 which is currently 60 minutes. This new route will mainly service the northeastern section
of the City and will provide direct access to Fashion Row. Staff has been working together with
Broward County to obtain County funding to cover some of the cost for this service. However,
Broward County funding is uncertain. This FDOT grant will fund up to 50% of capital and
operating expenses for the first year of operations.

DISCUSSION

Capital and operations costs for the first year of the new route are estimated at $139,500.
These costs are based on a rate $38.50 per hour for 12 hours days with 6 days a week service.
The hourly rate of $38.50 includes leasing the bus from Limousines of South Florida, the
company that is currently contracted by the City to operate the Community Bus Service.

If awarded, the FDOT grant would fund 50% of this total, or $69,750. Staff is requesting a total
of $140,000 in the FY 2008/09 budget. If both grants are obtained, the City may not have to
incur any cost for Route No. 4. However if the County grant is not obtained, the City will be
responsible for at least $69,750 (50%).
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 13

Total Cost FDOT County City
Cost for operations $139,500 $69,750 $69,750 $0
(with County Grant)

Cost for operations $139,500 $69,750 $0 $69,750
(without County Grant)

The grant application was due June 11, 2008. It has been submitted subject to approval of the
City Commission.

RECOMMENDATION

The City Commission adopt a Resolution authorizing an application for a Public Transit Service
Development Grant under FDOT‟s Discretionary Grant Program and authorize the City Manager
to execute the grant application and implement the grant program .

Prepared By: ________________________
Mary Francis Jeannot
Administrative Analyst II

Reviewed:

______________________________ _____________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

___ Approved ___ Denied ___ Hold for Discussion

Comments:
___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________________
06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 14

6C. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 2, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Daniel P. Sullivan, Fire Chief

SUBJECT: Request to Award Bid #F07-07-0828, (Florida Sheriffs Association Bid)
(2008Pierce Impel HDR Pumper)

SUMMARY
Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-108, Cooperative Purchasing, Hallandale Beach Code of
Ordinances, request authorization to award Bid #F07-07-0828, # 14 (Florida Sheriffs
Association Bid), (2008 Pierce Impel HDR Pumper), to lowest, responsive, responsible bidder
(Pierce Manufacturing Inc.), in the total amount of $ 445,540.14.
====================================================================
FINANCIAL DATA
1. DEPARTMENT: Fire
2. DIVISION: 2250 Fire Equipment R&R
3. FUND: 810 Fire Assessment Program
4. ACCOUNT #: 810-2250-522-6515
5. ACCT. DESCRIPTION: Capital Outlay, Trucks
6. FY BUDGET: FY 2007/2008
7. AMOUNT BUDGETED: $500,000
8. GRANT FUNDS: YES__ NO_X_ AMOUNT $
9. FUND TRANSFER: YES__ NO_X_ AMOUNT $
10. FROM ACCT. #: N/A
11. TO ACCT. #: N/A
12. REASON FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR TRANSFER: N/A
13. PRICE ANALYSIS: ATTACHED___ ADD'L MAT FDR___ NONE___*

====================================================================
BID ITEM DATA
14. DESCRIPTION OF BID ITEM: Heavy Duty Rescue Pumper (Fire Engine)*
15. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: ATTACHED___ ADD'L MAT FDR___ NONE___
16. # BID INVITATIONS SENT: N/A
17. # BIDS RECEIVED: N/A
18. # RESPONSIVE BIDS: N/A
19. CURRENT PRICE: $ 445,540.14*
20. CURRENT VENDOR: Pierce Manufacturing Inc.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 15

21. RECOMMENDED VENDOR: Pierce Manufacturing Inc.
22. BID AWARD AMOUNT:
23. COMMENTS*
24. ESTIMATED QUANTITY TO BE PURCHASED (BULK ITEMS): N/A
25. ESTIMATED PURCHASE AMOUNT:
26. BID TABULATION ATTACHED: YES___ NO_X_ ADD'L MAT FDR___
27. TERM OF CONTRACT:
28. BID VALID TO: N/A
29. BID PRICE VALID FOR TERM OF CONTRACT: YES___ NO___ COMMENTS___
30. WARRANTY PERIOD: *
31. DELIVERY TIME: 270-300 working days
32. STATE CONTRACT: YES_X__ NO___
33. CONTRACT #: 07-07-0828
34. CO-OP PURCHASE: YES___ NO_X__
35. AGENCY:
36. EXPECTED LIFE OF ITEM: 18 Years
37. ITEM DEMO'D: YES___ NO_X__
38. REFERENCES CHECKED: YES___ NO___ N/A_X__
39. CONTRACT: ATTACHED_X__ ADD'l MAT FDR___ N/A___
40. CONTRACT APPROVED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: YES_X__ NO___ N/A___

* See corresponding comment on Attachment 1, Bid Summary Comments
=====================================================================

REPORT PREPARED BY: _______ ___________ ____________
Tim Wiley, Battalion Chief Date

REVIEWED & SUBMITTED BY: __________________________ ____________
Daniel P. Sullivan, Fire Chief Date

REVIEWED AND CONCUR: ______________________________ ____________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

COMMENTS:

Exhibit "A"

ATTACHMENT 1
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 16

BID SUMMARY COMMENTS
BID NO. F-07-07-0828

13. Price taken from an established bid.
14. This item is a 1,500 gallon per minute triple combination fire engine, meeting all National
Fire Protection Association and Insurance Servicing Organizational recommendations
for this community.
19. The purchase price of $445,540.14 is inclusive of all options, and reflects a $15,075
prepayment discount.
23. Comments – Engine 385 is a 20 year old fire pumper which has met its life expectancy
and will be disposed of by the City Manager in accordance with the City Code.
30. Warranty: Chassis three years, Body ten years, and up to twelve on the paint.

Prepared By: _________________ ________ ______________
Timothy Wiley, Battalion Chief Date

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 17

6D.

CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 4, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Patricia M. Ladolcetta, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: Banking Services Request for Proposal (RFP) #2007-2008-001
CR #10/07

PURPOSE:

Seek financial/banking services from various banking institutions in order to compare services
and select one or more in the best interest of the City.

BACKGROUND:

Mayor Cooper requested that staff research the financial/banking services opportunities
available to the City, to which CR#10/07 was created. Discussions were held and it was
determined that it was in the best interest for a request for proposal (RFP) for Banking Services
to be conducted.

The City‟s current banking arrangements include accounts currently held in three financial
institutions with branches within Hallandale Beach: Bank of America, City National Bank and
Wachovia Bank.

RFP packets were e-mailed/sent to various banking institutions within the City of Hallandale
Beach and surrounding areas on April 3, 2008. The City received proposals from six (6) banks:
City National Bank, Bank of America, Wachovia Bank, Great Florida Bank, Commerce Bank,
and Bank Atlantic. Staff established a selection committee comprised of members of the
Finance Department, City Manager‟s office, and Risk Management to review the different
proposals and exchange ideas in order to select the best candidate from the six proposals
received.

DISCUSSION:

The proposals received were distributed to each of the members of the selection committee.
Each member reviewed the proposals independently and several meetings were held. The
different topics that were discussed during the meetings included a review and discussion of
cost/earnings comparisons to which questions and answers were exchanged, and other items
stipulated on page 17 of 34 of the RFP, Evaluation Factors, in order to render a consensus
recommendation.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 18

It was determined that each of the six (6) responding banks offered similar services and would
be capable of providing all of the services requested adequately, as well as any additional to be
considered in the future. All of the banks have local branches either within the City or various
areas of the Tri-County area. All of the respondents were part of larger National or Statewide
organizations. All of the banks offered attractive City employee banking programs. Most have
ties to the community in one way or another and are very involved in charitable and/or
community organizations and activities in various ways.

In short listing to the final three, much consideration was given to the financial stability of the
banks, convenience to the City, costs, earnings, and other factors. The three banks selected
were also considered to have the best reputation by an impartial internet bank rating resource.
Those at the far edges of the above factors were eliminated from further consideration.
ANALYSIS

Surrounding cities were surveyed to determine their experience with Banking RFP‟s, and
transitioning from the existing bank to a different bank. Experiences varied, but most agreed
that any transition would be difficult. There were helpful suggestions for the transition process,
should that be necessary. Should a transition to a bank(s) different from our existing bank(s) be
required:

 New software would need to be installed on accounting staff‟s computers in order to
effect online data transmission, reconciliation, access, etc.

 There would be duplicate costs for six to nine months or longer during which there would
be two sets of accounts open, while the former bank clears outstanding checks even as
the new bank begins operations.

 Staff would be required to perform duplicate duties on both sets of banks during this time

 All of our electronic payment arrangements with customers, grantor agencies, the county
and the state would need to be revised to reflect the new banking information

 All of our banking information with our investment vehicles, the SBA and PFM, would
need to be revised as well.

 If the payroll account is affected, every direct deposit employee would have to be pre-
noted prior to live transmittal, which may result in one or more payrolls on paper checks
.
 Procedures would be changed, and implemented with the corresponding learning curve.

 Armored car services arrangements would have to be changed.

After the complete review of the submitted proposals, three, City National Bank, Wachovia and
Bank of America were selected to be further evaluated and interviewed.

A detailed comparison was reviewed which revealed that one of the three banks, City National
Bank, excelled in a number of factors. It was the highest rated by the bank rating resource, as
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 19

being extremely financially stable. Its loan history to the City was examined and it has been
very involved in CRA area affordable housing loans. When inquired of their foreclosure history,
there have been none in the whole of Broward County and only one in the entire corporation. It
has a branch locally located within the city limits, and their community involvement both within
and outside of the City is admirable. In addition, their fees were the lowest, their interest
earnings rate the highest, and there is no balance reserve requirement for any of the accounts.
This cost/earnings difference results in a monthly increase in interest revenue of approximately
$8,000 or more; almost $100,000 annually. Obviously, the duplicate costs during transition
months would reduce this somewhat the first year, however the subsequent years of the
contract would reflect the anticipated revenue increases indicated.

The total and average ranking scores are as follows:

Bank Total Score
City National Bank 586, average 97.7
Bank of America 539, average 89.8
Wachovia Bank 539, average 89.8

Based upon all of the factors discussed in the RFP responses by the banks, the banking
services selection committee has selected City National Bank as our recommendation for award
of contract for Banking Services. Pursuant to Commission approval, staff will then negotiate an
implementation schedule, the specific services and accounts to be implemented, and other
specific terms of the contract.

RECOMMENDATION:

Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-104, Formal Contract Procedure, Hallandale Beach Code of
Ordinances, the City Commission approve award of RFP 2007-2008-001 Banking Services
Contract, to City National Bank and further authorize the City Manager
to proceed with execution of the contract agreement and subsequent contract renewals in the
best interest of the City.
Reviewed:

___________________________ _______________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____ Approved _____ Denied _____ Hold for Discussion

COMMENTS:
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
PML:ba
06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 20

6E. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 4, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Patricia Ladolcetta, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate and Fire Assessment
Rate for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager to Sign the
Certificate of Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the
Tentative Millage and Fire Assessment Rates
______________________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND

The TRIM Bill legislation requires municipalities to submit the Certification of Taxable Value
(Form DR-420) to the County Appraiser by August 4, 2008. Cities are required to certify, in this
form, the rolled-back millage rate, current year proposed millage rate, and the date, time and
location of the first public hearing.

DISCUSSION

Amendment One, which was passed by the voters on January 29, 2008, impacted the City‟s
taxable value as follows:

1. Additional $25,000 homestead exemption above just value of $50,000 – reduced taxable
value by $186,921,987
2. Portability of Save Our Homes – reduced taxable value by $4,412,986
3. $25,000 exemption for tangible personal property – reduced taxable value by
$14,395,446
4. 10% cap on non-homesteaded properties – no impact until 2010

House Bill 1B, together with Implementing Bill (SB1588), requires Maximum Levy Limits for FY
2008/2009 as follows:

 Majority Vote – Rolled-back rate (RBR) adjusted for Amendment One, plus per capita
personal income change (4.15%)
o For majority vote limit, must exclude impact of lost assessed value from RBR
calculation
 Two-thirds Vote – 110% of Rolled-back rate adjusted for per capita personal income,
without adjustment for taxable value loss
o The adjustment for lost assessed value for RBR calculation purposes is to be
ignored
o Thus the 110% limit is based upon the RBR that would be calculated with the
impact of lost assessed value from Amendment One (rollup, not rolldown)
 Unanimous Vote – up to 10 Mil cap
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 21

The Broward County Property Appraiser‟s Office has submitted their June 1st 2008 Estimate of
Taxable Value. The rolled-back millage will be 5.6545, when extended upon the current year's
adjusted taxable value of $3,483,206,190 [Gross taxable value ($4,833,868,668) minus new
taxable value ($446,913,414) minus CRA dedicated increment value ($903,749,064)]. The
City‟s gross taxable value had a decrease of $78,696,703 (or -1.6%) from $4,912,565,371 in
2007, to $4,833,868,668 in 2008.

Based upon this information the Maximum Levy Limits for FY 2008/2009 are as follows:

 Majority Vote – can levy a millage up to 5.5607
 Two-thirds Vote – can levy a millage up to 6.4781

The City‟s current millage rate is 4.9818. The millage rate staff proposes to provide to the
County is 5.5607. Please note that it has been the practice of the City in the past to set the
tentative millage rate higher than what was adopted for the purpose of flexibility. The City
Manager is currently reviewing the department requested budgets and there may be a need to
raise the millage rate. Additionally, the figures that are presented are based on the June 1 st
estimate of taxable value. The City will receive the certified taxable value on July 1st, which will
be different from the June 1st values. These updates will impact the City‟s rolled-back rate and
maximum millage rate calculations. Therefore it is prudent to set the City‟s tentative millage at a
higher rate than may be adopted. Once the City sets its tentative millage rate it cannot go above
that rate without re-advertising.

In addition to the millage rate, the City must also advise the Broward County Property Appraiser
the date and time of the public hearing and the total amount to be collected from the Fire
Assessment. The costs of Fire protection services for the City continues to rise as the City‟s
revenue streams from other sources continues to decline. For this reason the City Manager is
recommending to increase the Fire Assessment rate from $90 per year to $97 per year ($7
increase, or 7.8%) for residential classification. All other classifications will increase
proportionally. At $97 the City‟s rate would still be among the lowest in Broward County. For
Fiscal Year 2008-09, the gross assessment of $3,647,307 will net receipts of approximately
$3,537,889 or $295,994 above the current year amount of $3,241,895.

Staff proposes to conduct the Fire Assessment hearing at 6:30 p.m. on September 17, 2008 in
accordance with State Statute.

The date of the first public hearing by law has to be set between September 3 and September
18. Furthermore, it cannot conflict with either the County or the School Board's hearings. The
County has set its first public hearing for September 9, and its second for September 23. The
School Board has scheduled their hearing for September 4. Please also note the City's public
hearing must be held after 5:00 p.m.

The second public hearing to adopt the final millage rate must be held two to five days after
advertising the hearing and no later than October 1. In addition, the advertisement must be
within fifteen days from the first public hearing date.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 22

RECOMMENDATION

The City Commission:

1. Authorize the City Manager to sign and advise the appropriate agencies of the City
Commission approved proposed millage rate of 5.5607, the total Fire Assessment to be
collected as described on page one of this report and the date, time and location for the public
hearings; and,

2. Authorize the First Public Hearing on Wednesday, September 17, 2008, at 6:30 P.M. for the
Fire Assessment Hearing, the City Millage/Budget Hearing for 6:40 P.M., the Golden Isles Safe
Neighborhood District Hearing at 6:45 p.m. and the Three Islands Safe Neighborhood District
Hearing at 6:50 p.m.; and,

3. Authorize the Second City Millage/Budget Public Hearing on Wednesday, September 24,
2008, at 5:05 p.m. followed by the Golden Isles Safe Neighborhood District Hearing at 5:10
p.m., followed by the Three Islands Safe Neighborhood District Hearing at 5:15 p.m.

Prepared By:

____________________________________________
Robert Fraidenburg, Deputy Director of Finance

Reviewed:

____________________________ ______________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

____ Approved ____ Denied ____ Hold for Discussion

Comments: ___________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________
PML/rf

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 23

6F. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 4, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Patricia Ladolcetta, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate for the Golden Isles Safe
Neighborhood District for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager
to Sign the Certificate of Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the
Tentative Millage Rate
_______________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND

The Golden Isles Safe Neighborhood District will levy a millage as a dependent special district
of the City of Hallandale Beach and must adhere to all of the requirements of the TRIM
Legislation.

The TRIM Bill legislation requires dependent special districts to submit the Certification of
Taxable Value (Form DR-420) to the County Appraiser by August 4, 2008. This form indicates
the proposed millage and the date, time and location for the first public hearing for the District.

DISCUSSION

Amendment One, which was passed by the voters on January 29, 2008, impacted the Golden
Isles Safe Neighborhood District‟s taxable value as follows:

5. Additional $25,000 homestead exemption above just value of $50,000 – reduced taxable
value by $6,930,280
6. Portability of Save Our Homes – reduced taxable value by $0
7. $25,000 exemption for tangible personal property – n/a
8. 10% cap on non-homesteaded properties – no impact until 2010

The Broward County Property Appraiser‟s Office has submitted their June 1st 2008 Estimate of
Taxable Value. The rolled-back millage will be 1.1312, when extended upon the current year's
adjusted taxable value of $231,600,531 [Gross taxable value ($231,756,460) minus new taxable
value ($155,929). The District‟s gross taxable value had a decrease of $7,201,530 (or -3.12%)
from $230,623,290 in 2007, to $223,421,760 in 2008.

Based upon this information the Maximum Levy Limits for FY 2008/2009 are as follows:

 Majority Vote – can levy a millage up to 1.1426
 Two-thirds Vote – can levy a millage up to 1.2959
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 24

The District‟s current millage rate is 1.0934. The millage rate staff proposes to provide to the
County is 1.1426. Please note that it has been the practice of the District in the past to set the
tentative millage rate higher than what was adopted for the purpose of flexibility. The City
Manager is currently reviewing the department requested budgets and there may be a need to
raise the millage rate. Once the District sets its tentative millage rate it cannot go above that rate
without re-advertising.

The date of the first public hearing by law has to be set between September 3 and September
18. Furthermore, it cannot conflict with either the County or the School Board's hearings. The
County has set its first public hearing for September 9, and its second for September 23. The
School Board has scheduled their hearing for September 4. Please, also note that the District's
public hearing must be held after 5:00 p.m.

RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors:

1. Authorize the City Manager to sign and advise the appropriate agencies of the Board of
Directors' approved proposed millage rate of 1.1426 and the date, time and location for the two
public hearings; and,

2. Authorize the First Public Hearing on Wednesday September 17, 2008 at 6:45 p.m. and the
Second Public Hearing on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:10 p.m.

Prepared By:

__________________________________________
Robert Fraidenburg, Deputy Director of Finance

Reviewed:

_____________________________ ________________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

____ Approved ____ Denied ____ Hold for Discussion

Comments: __________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________
PML/rf
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 25

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 26

6G. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 4, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Patricia Ladolcetta, Director of Finance

SUBJECT: Consideration of Setting a Tentative Millage Rate for the Three Islands Safe
Neighborhood District for Fiscal Year 2008-09 and Authorizing the City Manager
to Sign the Certificate of Taxable Value and Advise Appropriate Agencies of the
Tentative Millage Rate
_______________________________________________________________

BACKGROUND

The Three Islands Safe Neighborhood District will levy a millage as a dependent special district
of the City of Hallandale Beach and must adhere to all of the requirements of the TRIM
Legislation.

DISCUSSION

Amendment One, which was passed by the voters on January 29, 2008, impacted the Golden
Isles Safe Neighborhood District‟s taxable value as follows:

9. Additional $25,000 homestead exemption above just value of $50,000 – reduced taxable
value by $45,364,410
10. Portability of Save Our Homes – reduced taxable value by $994,792
11. $25,000 exemption for tangible personal property – n/a
12. 10% cap on non-homesteaded properties – no impact until 2010

The Broward County Property Appraiser‟s Office has submitted their June 1st 2008 Estimate of
Taxable Value. The rolled-back millage will be .8306, when extended upon the current year's
adjusted taxable value of $608,616,770. The District‟s gross taxable value had a decrease of
$124,314,560 (or -16.96%) from $732,931,330 in 2007, to $608,616,770 in 2008.

Based upon this information the Maximum Levy Limits for FY 2008/2009 are as follows:

 Majority Vote – can levy a millage up to .8039
 Two-thirds Vote – can levy a millage up to .9516
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 27

The District‟s current millage rate is .6897. The millage rate staff proposes to provide to the
County is .8039. Please note that it has been the practice of the District in the past to set the
tentative millage rate higher than what was adopted for the purpose of flexibility. The City
Manager is currently reviewing the department requested budgets and there may be a need to
raise the millage rate. Once the District sets its tentative millage rate it cannot go above that rate
without re-advertising.

The date of the first public hearing by law has to be set between September 3 and September
18. Furthermore, it cannot conflict with either the County or the School Board's hearings. The
County has set its first public hearing for September 9, and its second for September 23. The
School Board has scheduled their hearing for September 4. Please, also note that the District's
public hearing must be held after 5:00 p.m.

RECOMMENDATION

The Board of Directors:

1. Authorize the City Manager to sign and advise the appropriate agencies of the Board of
Directors' approved proposed millage rate of .8039 and the date, time and location for the two
public hearings; and,

2. Authorize the First Public Hearing on Wednesday September 17, 2008 at 6:50 p.m. and the
Second Public Hearing on Wednesday, September 24, 2008 at 5:15 p.m.

Prepared By:

____________________________________________
Robert Fraidenburg, Deputy Director of Finance

Reviewed:

_____________________________ ____________________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

____ Approved ____ Denied ____ Hold for Discussion

Comments: _______________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
PML/rf
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 28

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 29

6H. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM
JC08-020

DATE: June 2, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Mayor Joy F. Cooper

SUBJECT: Discussion of Creating an Advisory Committee for the Community
Redevelopment Agency

I would like to place an item on the June 4, 2008 agenda for discussion to establish an Advisory
Committee for the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) Board of Directors. As we enter
the thirteen year of the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA), the CRA has established
most of the necessary infrastructure to lay the foundation for the next step of redevelopment of
the area.

The CRA and the City have been proactive in going out into the Community to connect with the
residents to hear what their needs and wants are. However, I believe the establishment of an
Advisory Committee to the CRA Board would be beneficial to not only the residents but the
Board of Directors as well to effectively establish a constant open line of communication.

I thank my fellow Commissioners for their support on this important issue.

JC/jf

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 30

6I. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 10, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Mayor Joy Cooper

SUBJECT: Discussion of the Evaluation of S.E. 2nd Street

Over the past several years traffic has become an increasing concern for the residents,
businesses owners, and visitors of the City of Hallandale Beach. Hallandale Beach is not only a
destination point but a pass through City between Aventura and Hollywood. It is extremely
important that we look to alternative roadways to relieve the congestion of our major thorough
fares, i.e. Hallandale Beach Boulevard, A1A, and Federal Highway.

One option which the City has been diligently pursuing is the connection of S.E. 2nd Street just
south of Hallandale Beach Boulevard. I would like to place an item on the June 18, 2008
agenda to discuss the connection of S.E. 2nd Street.

JC/jf
06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 31

11B. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 12, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: William Brant, P.E., Director, Public Works, Utilities & Engineering

SUBJECT: Request to Award Contract for Roadway and Swale Improvements on N.E. 14th
Avenue and Layne Boulevard
========================================================================
=====

SUMMARY

Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-107(6), Bids and Contracts from Other Entities, Hallandale
Beach Code of Ordinances, request authorization to award Florida Highway Products, Inc., a
contract in the amount of $125,622 for the MicroSurfacing of NE 14th Avenue and Layne Blvd.
using contract prices from Collier County, Florida Bid #06-3920; and,

Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-107(5), Unique Circumstances, request authorization to
award Florida Highway Products, Inc. a contract in the amount of $485,124 using prior contract
prices for the Full Depth Reclamation of Golden Isles Drive extended to Hallandale Beach by
Florida Highway Products, Inc. for the removal of asphalt and reconstruction using hot asphalt
and stripping of the swale area of N.E. 14th Avenue and the removal of existing curbing and
installation of new curbing and stripping on Layne Boulevard.

If approved, the City Manager will use City funds and appropriate amounts from Developer‟s
funds to fund the project.
========================================================================
=====
FINANCIAL DATA

1. DEPARTMENT: Public Works, Utilities & Engineering
2. DIVISION: Engineering
3. FUNDS: To be determined
4. ACCOUNT #: To be determined
5. ACCT. DESCRIPTION:
6. FY BUDGET: FY2007-2008
7. AMOUNT BUDGETED:
8. GRANT FUNDS: YES NO_X_ AMOUNT $ N/A
9. FUND TRANSFER: YES X NO __ AMOUNT $ N/A
10. FROM ACCT. To be determined
11. TO ACCT. #: To be determined
12. REASON FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR TRANSFER:
13. PRICE ANALYSIS: ATTACHED ADD'L MAT FDR NONE X_
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 32

====================================================================
BID ITEM DATA

14. DESCRIPTION OF BID ITEM: Refer to Summary, above
15. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: ATTACHED ADD'L MAT FDR NONE x
16. # BID INVITATIONS SENT: N/A
17. # BIDS RECEIVED: N/A
18. # RESPONSIVE BIDS: N/A
19. CURRENT PRICE: N/A
20. CURRENT VENDOR: N/A
21. RECOMMENDED VENDOR: Florida Highway Products, Inc.
22. BID AWARD AMOUNT $610,746
23. COMMENTS: Contract prices from existing contracts as described in the Summary, above
24. ESTIMATED QUANTITY TO BE PURCHASED (BULK ITEMS): N/A
25. ESTIMATED PURCHASE AMOUNT: N/A
26. BID TABULATION ATTACHED: YES NO X ADD'L MAT FDR
27. TERM OF CONTRACT: Contract prices are in effect during the period of the project
28. BID VALID TO: N/A
29. BID PRICE VALID FOR TERM OF CONTRACT: YES X NO COMMENTS
30. WARRANTY PERIOD: 1 year
31. DELIVERY TIME: 2 weeks from Notice to Proceed
32. STATE CONTRACT: YES NO X
33. CONTRACT #: N/A
34. CO-OP PURCHASE: YES NO X
35. AGENCY: N/A
36. EXPECTED LIFE OF ITEM: Base of Street: Indefinite /Surface of Street: 15 Years/Curbing:
20 Years
37. ITEM DEMO'D: YES NO N/A__X__
38. REFERENCES CHECKED: YES X NO N/A__
39. CONTRACT: ATTACHED ADD'l MAT FDR ___ N/A _X_
40. CONTRACT APPROVED FOR LEGAL SUFFICIENCY: YES NO N/A X

====================================================================

REPORT PREPARED BY: _______________________________ ____________
Beatriz Alvarez Date
Engineer I

REVIEWED & SUBMITTED BY: ____________________________ ___________
Gordon Dobbins Date
Assistant Director, Utilities/Sanitation

REVIEWED AND CONCUR: _____________________________ ___________
D. M. Good, City Manager Date
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 33

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 34

11C. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 12, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: E. Dent McGough, City Clerk/Director, General Services

SUBJECT: Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-104, Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances,
Authorize the Award of RFP # FY 2007-2008-003 Audio Visual Upgrade System
City Commission Chambers to AVI-SPL in an Amount not to Exceed $64,400

PURPOSE:

To authorize the award of RFP # FY 2007-2008-003 Audio Visual Upgrade System City
Commission Chambers to AVI-SPL in an amount not to exceed $64,400.

BACKGROUND:

The current audio and video equipment in the Commission Chambers was installed
approximately 10 years ago.

The current audio component of the system is a combination of an audio amplifier, mixer, and
speakers. The audio amplifier controls all microphones with one manual control. Adjustment
with this volume control is difficult and impractical during a Commission meeting.

The current video equipment utilizes VHS tape as the principal recording media. VHS tape
media yields poor quality rebroadcast of commission meetings and other events. DVD (Digital
Video Disk) and DVR (Digital Video Recorder) are becoming the standard recording method in
use by other cities to record and rebroadcast city events and meetings.

Members of the City Commission and the public have stated that the audio is difficult to
understand in the Commission Chambers. The audio is difficult to understand and the video is
blurry when the meetings are re-broadcast on the government access channel. Staff
determined that the current Commission Chambers audio/video equipment is not capable of
producing quality recordings or broadcasts.

DISCUSSION

The City released an RFP to improve of the audio and video broadcast quality in the City
Commission Chambers. The City received two responses to the RFP from AVI-SPL and Pro
Video Sales, Inc.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 35

Staff has evaluated both the proposals and held phone conferences with each vendor to clarify
system design, analyze each project plan, and determine the vendor‟s ability to complete the
project within the time and budget constraints.

The project is to be performed during the month of July during the Commission‟s summer break.
If needed, special meetings during July can be held in alternate locations such as Room 257 or
the Cultural Center.

Based on an analysis of both proposals and discussions with both companies, Staff
recommends awarding the RFP to AVI-SPL. The upgrade to the audio and video system
improvements include:

 Improved Sound Quality
o The existing 12” microphones used on the dais and on the podium will be
replaced with 18” shock mounted microphones to improve the sound quality of
the speakers voice
o Wireless Microphone system will be replaced to improve the sound quality.
o The new system incorporates automatic feedback elimination (i.e. eliminates the
squeals and other audio problems)
o The new audio equipment allows automatic or manual gain control (volume) for
each microphone (to ensure voices can be heard clearly)
o The New equipment will provide for better sound quality both in Chambers and
CATV broadcasts
o Additional small speakers on the dais will provide better sound quality to allow
Commissioners to better hear meeting proceedings.

 Improve Video Quality
o DVR provides better video quality for rebroadcast than the VHS system currently
in use and digital recordings do not degrade over time.
o The new system facilitates the rapid creation of DVD copies of the Commission
Meeting

 Recording of Remote City Events
o Provides equipment to record remote City events on-demand
o Provides the ability to easily and quickly rebroadcast these events

Staff is confident the upgraded audio and video components will allow the City to provide quality
audio and video coverage of Commission Meetings and other City events.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 36

RECOMMENDATION:

Pursuant to Chapter 23, Section 23-104, Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances, the City
Commission authorize the award of RFP # FY 2007-2008-003 Audio Visual Upgrade System
City Commission Chambers to AVI-SPL in an amount not to exceed $64,400 and authorize the
City Manager to execute the contract and determine the appropriate accounts for the
expenditure.

Prepared by: ______________________________
Shari Canada, Deputy City Clerk

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 37

12A. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 2, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Richard Cannone, Development Services Director

SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinances relative to the Hallandale Park Central property
located at 301 N. Federal Highway/507 NE 4th Street.

PURPOSE:

To adopt on Second Reading the following Ordinances relative to the Park Central project:

1. Ordinance changing the land use of the subject property on the City‟s Future Land Use
Map from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density-2. (The City
Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on January 22, 2008).

2. Ordinance changing the zoning of the subject property from RM-18 District to RM-HD2
District. (The City Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on January 22,
2008).

3. Ordinance applying the Planned Development Overlay Zoning District to the subject
property. (The City Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on April 16,
2008).

4. Ordinance vacating certain portions of NE 4th Street, NE 4th Avenue and adjacent
alleyways within the Hollywood Pines Estates Subdivision. (The City Commission
approved First Reading of this Ordinance on April 16, 2008).

BACKGROUND

The City Commission held public hearings and approved the referenced Ordinances as
discussed above. The following related pending applications were to be brought back to the
City Commission when ready:

1. Application #32-07-DB for Major development approval in order to build the proposed
mixed use development with 372 residential units and 20,200 square feet of commercial
use.

2. Application #39-07-CU for a Conditional Use permit in order to build the proposed
residential component of the mixed use project on the portion of the property zoned B-G,
Business General District.

3. Application # 40-07-P to replat the 7.44 acre subject property.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 38

4. Resolution assigning 257 residential Flexibility Units from Flex Zone #93 to the subject
property.

DISCUSSION

Attached are the staff reports prepared for First Reading of the four (4) Ordinances that include
policy and technical analysis.

The Staff report, with appropriate data and analysis for the applications pending presentation to
the City Commission mentioned above will be provided by a separate memorandum and are
also scheduled for the June 18, 2008 City Commission meeting.

RECOMMENDATION

Staff recommends adoption of the attached Ordinances on Second and Final Reading
concurrent with City Commission approval of the applications listed in the Background section of
this memorandum.

Prepared By: __________________________________________
Christy Dominguez, Director of Planning & Zoning

Reviewed:

_______________________ ______________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

____ Approved ____ Denied ____ Hold for Discussion

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
CD/sj

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 39

12E. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: April 2, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Richard Cannone, Development Services Director

SUBJECT: Applications: #32-07-DB, #39-07-CU and #40-07-P Hallandale Park
Central, 301 North Federal Highway and 507 NE 4th Street.

I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION
______________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT

Hallandale Park Central, LLC

Project Name

Hallandale Park Central

REQUEST

The applicant is requesting the following:

1. Application #32-07-DB for Major Development Review approval pursuant to Section 32-
782 of the Zoning and Land Development Code in order to build a mixed-use
development with 372 residential units and 16,800 square feet of commercial use and
3,400 square feet of restaurant space.

2. Application #39-07-CU for a Conditional Use Permit pursuant to Section 32-176(d)(2) of
the Zoning and Land Development Code in order to build the mixed use
commercial/residential building of the subject property.

3. Application # 40-07-P to Replat the 7.444 acre subject property.

4. Assignment of 257 Residential Flexibility Units to the project.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 40

LOCATION

The property is located at 301 North Federal Highway and 507 NE 4th Street

For purposes of this report, the subject properties will be referred to as Parcels A and B as
legally described in the attached survey and further depicted on the location sketch below:

Parcel “A”

Parcel “B”
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 41

PLANNING DISTRICT

Dog Track

PARCEL SIZE

Parcel A: 1.00 Acres
Parcel B: 6.44 Acres
Total: 7.44 Acres

EXISTING ZONING

Parcel A: Business General District (B-G); Residential Multifamily-18 District (RM-18) with
Planned Redevelopment Overlay District (PRD).

Parcel B: Presently zoned RM – 18 District. City Commission on January 22, 2008 approved
First Reading of and Ordinance to Rezone to Residential High Density – 2 District (RM-HD-2
adoption hearing is pending).

EXISTING USE

The Palmetto Trailer Park with 130 trailer homes and the Paddock Mobile Home Park with 61
trailer homes and one story vacant commercial building. Most of the mobile homes at the park
have since been removed.
PROPOSED USE

Six story mixed use structure with 372 residential units and 20,200 square feet of commercial
space.

SURROUNDING ZONING

North - Commercial Recreational (Active) District
South - (RD-12) Residential Two Family (Duplex) District
East - (RS-6) Residential Single Family District
West (BL) Business Limited

SURROUNDING LAND USE

North - Residential Multi-family (RM-18) District and (B-G) Business
General District
South - Residential Multi-family (RM-18) District
East - Business general District
West - Residential Multi-family (RM-18) District
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 42

II. LAND USE HISTORY
___________________________________________________________________

Previous Request

On October 31, 2007, the following related applications were presented to the Planning and
Zoning Board:

1.) Application #35-07-PA for a Small Scale Future Land Use Plan Map
Amendment to change the land use designation of the portion of the
property presently designated Residential Medium Density to Residential,
High Density-2 (HD-2) Category on the City‟s Future Land Use Map.

The Board recommended approval by a majority vote (5-1) (Cooper-No).

2.) Application #36-07-TC for a Land Use Plan Text Amendment to the City‟s
Comprehensive Plan, Future Land Use Element as follows:

(a) Section 2.3.A.5 – Residential High Density-2 Category: addition of
text to permit an increase in density of up 12 dwelling units per net
acre provided the following criteria is met:
(a) the development contains residential and non residential uses;
(b) the development is located within ¼ mile of Federal Highway;
(c) up to twelve (12) bonus units per net acre are affordable;
(d) the gross density of the development doe not exceed (50)
dwelling units per gross acre.

The Board recommended denial by a majority vote (6-0).

(b) Section 2.3.B.1 – Neighborhood Commercial Category: addition
of text to and permit an increase in density of up 12 dwelling
units per net acre provided the following criteria is met:
(a) the development contains residential and non residential uses:
(b) the development is located within ¼ mile of Federal Highway;
(c) up to twelve (12) bonus units per net acre are affordable;
(d) the gross density of the development does not exceed (50) dwelling
units per gross acre.

The Board recommended denial by a majority vote (6-0).
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 43

3.) Application #32-06-Z to rezone the portion of the property presently zoned
RM-18 (Residential Multi-Family) District to RM-HD2 (Residential High
Density-2) District

The Board recommended approval by a majority vote (5-1) (Cooper-No).

4.) Application # 37-07-TC for a Zoning Code Text Amendment to Section 32-
157( c) of the City‟s Zoning and Land Development Code, RM-HD2,
(Residential Multi-family, High Density-2) District to permit an increase in
density of up 12 dwellings units per net acre provided the following criteria
is met:

(a) the development contains residential and non residential uses;
(b) the development is located within ¼ mile of Federal Highway;
(c) up to twelve (12) bonus units per net acre are affordable;
(d) the gross density of the development does not exceed (50) dwelling
units per gross acre.

The Board recommended denial by a majority vote (6-0).

The minutes of the hearing are attached. These minutes were prepared verbatim and precede
the City Commission directive for summary minutes.

On January 22, 2008, the City Commission approved on First Reading, two ordinances relative
to the Park Central project as follows:

1. An ordinance changing the Land Use plan designation of the residentially zoned portion
of the property (Parcel B) from Residential Medium density such property legally
described as lots 9-22 block 4, Lots 9-22 Block 5 and all of Block 6 Hollywood Pines
Estates.

2. An ordinance changing the zoning of the above referred property from RM-18 to RM-HD-
2 District.

On April 16, the City Commission approved on First Reading the following Ordinances relative
to the subject property:

1. Ordinance applying the Planned Development Overlay District to the subject property.

2. Ordinance vacating certain portions of NE 4th Street, NE 4th Avenue and adjacent
alleyways within the Hollywood Pines Estates Subdivision.

Second Reading of the above mentioned ordinances is pending and will be presented to the
City Commission with all related applications for this project.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 44

On March 26, 2008, the following applications were presented to the Planning and Zoning
Board:

1. Application #39-07-CU for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a residential component in
the commercially zoned portion of the property.

2. Application #40-07-P to Replat the subject property.

The Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of the applications by a majority vote
(3-2), (Cooper and Butler – No). The minutes of the hearing are also attached.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 45

______________________________________________________________________

III. DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION
______________________________________________________________________

Development Details

1. A 6 story building, 372 multi-family units with 20,200 square feet of commercial space
with no greater than 3,400 square feet of restaurant use on the ground floor fronting
North Federal Highway.
2. The apartment complex will have 184 one bedroom units, 165 two bedroom units and 23
three bedroom units.
3. An entrance driveway from NE 3rd Street to ground level parking lot with 27 spaces and
a six (6) level parking garage for commercial lot parking. Residential parking via
entrance/exit is a two-way driveway west of the commercial parking area. A one-way
egress driveway is proposed from NE 4th Court for sanitation and emergency vehicle
access only.
4. 40.09% of the site will be landscaped (35% is required).
5. A total of 38 Live Oak trees and 48 Yellow Poinciana trees are proposed along the north,
south, and west property lines. 12 Florida Royal Palm trees are proposed along North
Federal Highway.
6. A bus shelter is proposed on North federal Highway.
7. A new westbound right turn lane is proposed at the intersection of North federal Highway
and NE 3rd Street.
8. Three trash room locations are proposed to service the building.
9. 762 parking spaces are proposed and 763 parking spaces are required.

IV. INTERDEPARTMENT REVIEW SUMMARY
______________________________________________________________________

MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

Comments/issues identified by the Development Review Committee (DRC) were discussed with
the applicant during DRC review of the application. The majority of these comments/issues were
addressed and incorporated into the Major Development Plan application. The applicant has
committed to traffic improvements to mitigate the traffic concerns raised by the DRC.

The DRC recommends approval of the Major Development, Conditional Use Permit and Plat
requests, subject to conditions outlined in the Staff report, the proposed Development
Agreement, and Resolution assigning Flexibility Units and the Resolution adopting the proposed
Plat.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 46

______________________________________________________________________

V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSIDERATIONS
______________________________________________________________________

CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT

The City‟s and County‟s Comprehensive Plan permits residential units within commercial
designated land provided the local government applies flexibility or reserve units to the parcel
pursuant to Section 3-176(d)(2) of the City‟s Zoning and Land Development Code and
Conditional Use Application process.

(Note: Flexibility Units are defined as the difference between the number of dwelling units
permitted within a flexibility zone by the Broward County Land Use Plan and the number of
dwelling units permitted within the flexibility zone by the City‟s Land Use Plan.)

The City is divided into 2 Flexibility Zones. The FEC Railroad serves as the dividing line
between zones. The subject property is located in Flexibility Zone #93 and is one (1) acre in
size. There are 1,098 Residential Flexibility Units available within Flex Zone #93. The
maximum number of Flexibility Units may be assigned to the commercial parcel pursuant to the
Neighborhood Commercial category is 50. The applicant is requesting assignment of 50
Flexibility Units to the commercial designated portion of the property. An additional 207
Flexibility Units will be required to accommodate the 372 residential units proposed by the Park
Central project for a total of 257 Flexibility Units.

Assignment of 257 Flexibility Units to the Park Central project would reduce the number of
Flexibility Units in Flex Zone # 93 to 841.*

*Note: The City recently approved the Hallandale Oasis application with a request for 250
Flexibility Units and is presently processing the R.K. Townhomes for a request of 9
Flexibility units. Should the City Commission approve the R.K. Townhomes project, the
number of flex units available in the Flex Zone # 93 would be reduced to 832 flex units.

The City‟s Residential Flexibility Unit Pool provides a mechanism to expedite the City‟s
processing of residential development/redevelopment projects beneficial to the community
without the need of a concurrent Broward County Land Use map amendment. Whenever
feasible, however, staff has always recommended that Flex or Reserve Units be recaptured for
future use. Pursuant to the City‟s and County‟s Comprehensive Plans, the 50 flexibility units
requested to be assigned to the commercial parcel (Parcel A) cannot be recouped for
commercial designated properties. However, the 207 Flexibility Units requested for the
residential designated parcel (Parcel B) may be recaptured if the applicant applies for a City and
County Small Scale map amendment.

Should the City Commission approve the assignment of Flex Units to this project, it is staff‟s
recommendation that the applicant be required to apply for a County map amendment to enable
the City to recoup the Flex Units assigned to Parcel B of the
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 47

project. The applicant has agreed to this condition and is specified in the Development
Agreement.

MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

The proposal is consistent with the City‟s Comprehensive Plan subject to the City Commission
approving the companion Ordinances on Second Reading, changing the designation of the
residential parcel (Parcel B) from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density-2 and
assignment of the requested 257 Residential Flexibility Units. In addition, staff finds that this
development is consistent with the City‟s Comprehensive Plan. All of the uses proposed by the
applicant are permitted under the proposed land use category. Additionally, the proposed
development will assist in furthering the following policies and objectives of the City‟s
Comprehensive Plan:

Policy 1.2.4: North Federal Highway: The City shall develop a redevelopment or appearance
improvement strategy for the North Federal Highway Corridor by 2002.

Policy 1.2.10: The City shall reduce land use conflicts through prohibiting incompatible
commercial uses in residential neighborhoods, through enforcement of the Hallandale Beach
Zoning District requirements. Commercial development shall be limited primarily to the
perimeter areas of Hallandale Beach‟s planning districts (as delineated in the Element) Well –
planned mixed use projects and appropriate neighborhood commercial uses in defined
neighborhood commercial notes are encouraged when they will improve an area observed as
neighborhood centers. However, commercial uses within residential areas shall not be
considered incompatible if, through proper screening, buffering design and access control, there
are no significant noises, odors, fumes, vibrations or other negative impacts beyond site
boundaries and provided the use is either tied to a neighborhood commercial node or a
peripheral commercial corridor or area.

Policy 1.3.4: Residential areas should continue to be buffered from high intensity nonresidential
uses.

A. Low to medium range residential densities should continue to be located with access to
existing local, collector and minor arterial streets.

B. High density residential developments should continue to be located with direct access
major arteries.

Policy 1.3.6: The City shall encourage infill residential development.

Policy 1.5.8: Development themes for land use along Hallandale Beach Boulevard and U.S. 1
shall be incorporated into the Land Development Code in the form of Special Zoning Districts
that redefine these corridors as focal areas of the City. In conjunction with development of
these Special Zoning Districts, site development standards will be revised to include innovative
approaches to site and building design.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 48

Policy 1.10.4: The City shall maintain innovative land development regulations that encourage
mixed-use developments and incorporate site design planning techniques that will enhance the
quality of large scale developments or redevelopment areas.
Policy 1.10.6: The City shall study and consider amortization and other methods of requiring
nonconforming mobile home parks to meet Codes, including replacement of the parks with
conforming uses by 1998.

Objective 1.16: Urban Infill and Redevelopment: Establish criteria which encourage
development of urban infill and urban redevelopment area(s) to promote economic
development, increase housing opportunities, and maximize the use of existing public facilities
and service.

Policy 1.16.1: Increase economic development and employment opportunities within urban infill
and urban redevelopment area(s).

Policy 1.16.2: Adequate housing opportunities necessary to accommodate all segments of
present and future residents shall be provided within urban infill and urban redevelopment
area(s).

Policy 1.16.3: The Hallandale Beach Land Use Plan shall encourage mixed use developments
within urban infill and urban redevelopment area(s).
___________

VI. APPLICATION CODES AND ORDINANCES
___________

A. Major Development Plan

1. Parcel A of the subject site is zoned B-G Business General District. Parcel B of the subject
property is proposed to be zoned RM-HD-2 District. Section 32-157 (b) permits multi-family
use in RM-HD-2 District. Section 32-157 limits permitted density in said district to 50
dwelling units per acre subject to assignment of Flexibility or Reserve Units for density
above permitted by City‟s Land Use map.

The applicant proposes to develop a multi-family complex at a density of 50 dwelling
units per acre in the residential as well as in the commercial zoned portion of the
property.

2. The Planned Redevelopment Overlay (PRD) District is assigned to the property. Section
32-176(d)(2) permits mixed uses on sites no less than one acre subject to assignment of
flexibility units under the Broward County Flexibility Rules Document. Paragraph (g)(7) of the
subsection states that commercial designated properties in PRD District of at least one acre in
size shall be permitted, subject to assignment of flexibility units, at a the maximum density of 25
dwelling units per acre. Projects at a density of 50 units per acre require a minimum of 2 acres
in size.

The commercial designated portion of the property, Parcel A, is 1.0 acre in size thus,
the proposed density of 50 units per acre exceeds the maximum density allowed for
residential development on a commercial parcel of one
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 49

acre in PRD District. As a result, the applicant is only allowed 25 units to be built on
Parcel A. The applicant proposes to build 50 units on Parcel A, therefore, a Waiver of
the above referenced section is being requested by the developer in order to build at
the proposed density of 50 dwelling units on the commercial parcel.

3. The Planned Development Overlay District (PDD) is proposed to be assigned to the
property. Section 32-174(i), Planned Development District (PDD) provides assignment of
PDD as an optional zoning procedure to permit site design flexibility, greater land use
intensity in order to encourage high quality innovative development and, promote its most
appropriate use consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. Development in PDD is
governed by a Development agreement pursuant to Section 32-174(d)(2).

The uses permitted in a PDD are those uses enumerated by the underlying zoning
district and must be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The proposed
multi-family use is permitted by RM-HD-2, the underlying zoning district. The
proposed mixed-use on Parcel A, is also permitted subject to assignment of
Flexibility Units by the City Commission.

4. All site development standards in PDD are negotiated between the City and the applicant as
part of the development process. Development must be in compliance with the site plan as
approved by the City Commission. The City Commission may waive any development
standards such as specified setbacks, floor area, landscaping or parking requirements in
lieu of a variance within areas zoned PDD.

The proposal does not meet the minimum floor area for apartments in RM-HD-2. In
addition it does not meet the minimum corner side yard setback required and
provides one dead-end corridor as further discussed below. The applicant requests
that these requirements be waived pursuant to Section 32-174(i)(1) of the PDD
regulations, which permits all site development standards and related development
standards of the Zoning and Land Development Code to be negotiated as part of the
development process.

5. Section 32-157(c)(7) requires 1000 square feet in gross floor area for each (1) one bedroom
apartment, 1100 square feet in gross floor area for each (2) two bedroom apartment and
1200 square feet for each 3 bedroom apartment on properties zoned RM-HD-2 District.

The applicant has also requested modification of the above referenced section due to
the deficiency of the one and two bedroom units proposed and consideration of the
project for properties in RM-HD-2 District as shown below:

Unit Type Required Proposed Deficiency
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 50

1 bedroom 1000 sq. ft. 752 sq. ft. 248 sq. ft.

2 bedroom 1100 sq. ft. 932-1069 sq.ft. 168 sq. ft.

3 bedroom 1200 sq.ft. 1272 sq.ft. -0-

When the proposal is compared to the adjacent properties in RM-18 and RM-25 districts
requirements, the development meets the minimum floor area required for said districts
as follows:

Apartment Type Required Proposed Deficiency

One bedroom 700 sq. ft. 750-752 sq.ft. -0-

Two bedroom 850 sq. ft. 932-1,069 sq.ft. -0-

Three bedroom 1,050 sq. ft. 1,272 sq.ft. -0-

Staff has no objections to the granting of the requested waiver from the sunit size
requirements of the RM-HD-2 District.

6. Section 32-455(b)(3) relative to multi-family residential uses requires 1.5 parking spaces for
every one bedroom apartment, 1.75 spaces for every two bedroom apartment in excess of two,
plus additional 10% of the total number required for guest parking.

Residential Required Proposed Deficiency
184 - 1 Bedroom units × 1.50 = 276 - -
165 - 2 Bedroom units × 1.75 = 289 - -
23 - 3 Bedroom units × 2.0 = 46 - -
10% Guest Parking = 62 _______ _______

Residential Total = 673 (673) - 0-

Commercial Required Proposed Deficiency
Retail – 16,800 sq.ft. × 1/300 sq.ft. = 56 - -
Restaurant- 3,400 sq.ft. × 1/100 sq.ft. = 34 - -

Residential Total = 90
Residential Total = 673 ______ ______
GRAND TOTAL = 763 762 -1-

Based on the above criteria, the proposal is one parking space deficient from the code
requirement standards, thus, the applicant is also requesting a waiver of the one parking
space. Staff is recommending that this waiver be granted. Further, as noted above,
restaurant use on the property will be limited to 3,400 square feet as only 34 parking
spaces are provided for such use.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 51

7. Section 32-453(i)(4) requires that all parking corridors in excess of four (4) abutting parking
spaces shall be designed to permit vehicle entry and exit in one continuous forward motion
without using a vacant space to turn around.

The parking lot is designed with one parking corridor on the west side of the surface
parking area. This area includes 5 contiguous parking spaces that dead-end. Therefore,
the applicant has requested a waiver pursuant to the PDD regulations. Thus, because
there is no turn-around on the site and this is not permitted by the Code; Staff is
recommending that this waiver be granted.

8. Section 32-157(c)(6) requires a minimum of 35% of properties zoned
RM-HD-2 District be landscaped and 15% for commercial zoned properties.

The proposal as designed provides 40.09% landscaping. In addition, the project is
designed with 9.33% additional open space and pedestrian sidewalks which are not
required by Code but are amenities that enhance the development such as providing
pedestrian access to recreational common areas throughout the community. Staff would
like to note 28% of the landscaped area includes the 2 acre parcel on the west parcel of
the site (Block 5). It is Staff’s and the the Planning and Zoning Board’s recommendation
that this parcel be dedicated as public open space. The applicant has agreed to this
condition and has been specified in the Development Agreement. Dedication of the two
(2) acre parcel would reduce the onsite landscaped area to 12.9%. However, as a result
of the dedication of the parcel for recreational open space area, staff has no objections
to a waiver from minimum landscaping area requirements.

9. Section 32-284 (c)(3) requires one tree for every 1,500 square feet of lot area. Section 32-385
(c)(2) requires a minimum of 10 feet in height trees for residential uses and 15 feet for the
commercial uses.

According to the above criteria 213 trees are required. The applicant proposes to install
295 trees which exceed the code requirements.

10. Section 32-384 (e)(1) requires a minimum of a 10 foot landscaped buffer along the perimeter of
property adjacent to a public right-of-way.

The applicant proposes a 4.5 foot landscaped buffer along NE 3rd Street and is requesting
a waiver of the above referenced code section as provided by PDD regulations.

B. Conditional Use Permit

1. The Commercial zoned portion of the property (Parcel “A”) is presently zoned B-G and
Planned Redevelopment Overlay (PRD) District. Article III Section 32-176(d)(2), of the
City‟s Zoning and Land Development Code permits by a Conditional Use Permit,
medium and high-density residential uses in PRD areas in conjunction with a mixed use
project subject to the provisions for residential and mixed use set forth in Section
2.3(B)(1) the Neighborhood Commercial category of the City‟s Comprehensive Plan
Future Land Use Element.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 52

The applicant proposes to build a mixed use mid rise building which will contain a
total of 372 residential units of which 50 units will be within the commercial
portion of the property. The applicant seeks Conditional Use which would allow
the proposed residential component of the project pursuant to the above section
and requests assignment by the City Commission of 50 Flexibility Units to Parcel
A.

2. Parcel “A”, the portion of the property fronting North Federal Highway is designated
Commercial in the City‟s and County‟s Future Land Use Maps. The Neighborhood
Commercial land use designation permits mixed commercial/residential developments
as follows:

a. Residential uses shall be subject to allocation of Residential Flexibility or
Reserve Units for the site.

b. For mixed commercial/residential developments greater than 5 acres in size,
freestanding multi-family residential uses are permitted provided the gross
residential acreage does not exceed 5 acres or 40% of the commercially-
designated site, whichever is greater, and the entire mixed
commercial/residential development be governed by specific zoning regulations
that establish criteria to ensure proper integration and compatibility of land uses
within and surrounding the development.

c. Residential densities shall not exceed 50 dwelling units per acre.

Parcel A, the commercial designated portion of the property is 1.0 acre in size.
Based on the above criteria, the residential densities for commercially designated
land cannot exceed 50 dwelling units per acre or 50 units. The applicant proposes
to build 50 residential dwelling units within this commercial area, which is
permitted by the Comprehensive Plan. The use is allowed subject to assignment
by the City Commission of Residential Flexibility Units. The applicant is
requesting assignment of 50 Residential Flexibility Units to this area and will
request an additional 207 Flexibility units to allow the total 372 units proposed.

3. The Planned Redevelopment Overlay (PRD) is assigned to the property. Section 32-
176(d)(2) also permits mixed uses on sites no less than one acre subject to assignment
of flexibility or reserve units under the Broward County Flexibility Rules Document.
Paragraph (g)(7) of the subsection states that commercial designated properties in PRD
District of at least one acre in size shall be permitted, subject to assignment of flexibility
units, at a the maximum density of 25 dwelling units per acre. Projects at a density of 50
units per acre require a minimum of 2 acres in size.

The property is 1.0 acre in size thus, the proposed density of 50 units per acre
exceeds the maximum density allowed for residential development on a
commercial parcel of one acre in PRD District. As a result, the applicant is only
allowed 25 units to be built on Parcel A. The applicant proposes to build 50 units
on Parcel A; therefore, a waiver of the above referenced
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 53

section will be required in order to build at the proposed density of 50 dwelling
units. Staff is recommending that this waiver be granted

C. PLAT

1. The applicant has submitted a Plat for the subject parcel. The applicant‟s proposal satisfies
the submission requirements for platting. The proposed plat restricts development to 372
high rise residential units, 16,800 square feet of commercial and 3,400 square feet of
restaurant use.

2. The applicant has initiated plat approval proceedings with the Broward County Development
Management Division. The Division has issued a Development Review Report based on
applicable Broward County review agencies specific recommendations. (Note: A copy of the
Broward County Development Review Report and applicant‟s response is on file in the
Development Services Department.) The County‟s Development Review Report includes
four (4) staff recommendations regarding non vehicular access line and right of way
dedication requirements which the developer has objected to and are listed below:

(a) County Recommendation: Along the right-of-way line for Federal Highway provide a
Non-vehicular Access Line along North east 4th Court for a minimum of 100 feet.

Applicant’s Response: The current design of the mixed use building, the centerline of
the easternmost driveway connection for the proposed “Loading Zone” on Northeast 4 th
Court is 94.51‟ west of the ultimate right-of-way line of Federal Highway. Accordingly,
the recommended 100‟ minimum Non-Vehicular Access Line along Northeast 4th Court
cannot be provided by the proposed development per the proposed driveway locations
and configurations on Northeast 4th Street. However, a Non-Vehicular Access Line of
approximately 77.87‟ will be provided by the proposed development‟s proposed
driveway locations and configurations for the proposed “Loading Zone on Northeast 4th
Court.

(b) County Recommendation: Provide a Non Vehicular access line along Northeast 3rd
Street for a minimum of 300 feet.

Applicant’s Response: The current design of the mixed use building, the centerline
of the easternmost driveway connections into the proposed parking garage/building off
of Northeast 3rd Street is 316.61‟ west of the future right-of-way line (after right-of-way
dedications by proposed Plat for south bound right turn lane on Federal Highway at
Northeast 3rd Street) of Federal Highway. Accordingly, the recommended 300‟
minimum Non-Vehicular Access Line along Northeast 3rd Street cannot be provided by
the proposed development per the proposed driveway location and configuration.
However, a Non-Vehicular Access Line of approximately 297.2 will be provided by the
proposed development‟s proposed driveway locations and configurations on Northeast
3rd Street.

(c) County Recommendation: Dedicate Seven (7) feet right-of-way to comply with the
Broward County Trafficways Plan on Federal Highway, an 80 foot collector.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 54

Applicant’s Response: The applicant objects to the dedication of a 7 foot right of way
on Federal Highway. Based on the latest Right-of-Way Map for Federal Highway, the
80 foot collector has a 40 foot right of way on each side of the centerline. Because we
have the required 40 foot right of way on each side of the centerline, no further
dedications should be required.

(d) County Recommendation: Dedicate right-of-way for a corner chord based upon a 30
foot radius at the intersection of Federal Highway (US 1) and Northeast 4 Court.

Applicant’s Response: Note that right-of-way based upon a 30 foot radius only has
been provided at the intersection of Federal Highway and Northeast 4th Court. The
proposed dedication of right-of-way by way of a 30 foot radius instead of the
recommend chord of a 30 foot radius at this intersection was presented to the Florida
Department of Transportation for their consideration (FDOT) and the FDOT had no
objection to the dedication of additional right-of-way by way of the 30 foot radius at this
intersection due to the fact that no signalization improvements are planned by FDOT
for the intersection of Federal Highway and Northeast 4th Court. The FDOT District
Permit Engineer, Roger Lalanne, P.E. indicated that the FDOT would accept the 30
foot radius right-of-way dedication at the corner of NE 4th Court if the FDOT had no
plans to signalize the intersection within the five (5) years. FDOT confirmed that they
had no plans to signalize this intersection at any time in the future.

2. The Department of Public Works and Engineering reviewed the site plan and plat and
requested a 12 foot utility easement along the north, south, east and west property lines.
These easements have been provided and are reflected on the proposed plat.
______________________________________________________________________

VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
______________________________________________________________________

A. CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW CRITERIA

ARTICLE VI, SECTION 1 (1.02) Conditional uses: Applications for conditional uses shall be
reviewed with consideration given to the following:

(1) That the use is compatible with the existing natural environment and other properties
within the neighborhood.

Consistent. The surrounding neighborhood consists of residential high-density,
multi-family, mobile home parks, commercial and commercial recreational uses,
therefore, the residential component of this mixed-use project within the
Commercial Zoned portion of the property is well integrated with its surrounding
uses.

(2) That the use will create no substantial detrimental effects on property values in the
neighborhood.

Consistent. The surrounding area consists primarily of medium and high-density
residential, retail, offices, and the Mardi Gras gaming center therefore, the
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 55

proposed residential mixed-use project will not create detrimental effects on any
surrounding property values. The addition of mixed use buildings will
substantially improve the area and is consistent with the purpose of the PRD
Overlay District and the City’s Comprehensive Plan.

(3) That there are adequate public facilities such as schools, roads, parks, and utilities
within the service areas involved.

Consistent. Adequate public facilities exist within the subject service area. The
developer will be required to demonstrate the proposal will meet all concurrency
requirements of Chapter 32 of the Code as part of the review of the Major
Development Plan.

(4) That there will be adequate provisions for the traffic movement, both vehicular and
pedestrian, both internal to the use and in the area which will serve the use.

Consistent. Vehicular and pedestrian traffic movements were reviewed as part of
the Major Development Plan application and were found to be adequate. The
proposed development will not obstruct or impede pedestrian movements. Traffic
impacts on roadway system will be addressed and mitigated in the Major
Development Plan application submitted directly to Commission.

(5) That there will be adequate drainage systems to service the use with particular attention
to the necessity for on-site retention systems to alleviate drainage and pollution
problems.

Consistent. A storm water drainage system will be provided as required by Code.

(6) That there are adequate setbacks, buffering, and general amenities in order to control
any adverse effects of noise, light, dust, and other nuisances.

Consistent. The proposed project will actually upgrade and enhance the
landscaping and buffering in the immediate area and will not result in the creation
of any nuisances.

(7) That the land area is sufficient, appropriate and adequate for the use and for any
reasonably anticipated expansion thereof.

Consistent. The proposal is in compliance with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Additionally, the proposed site carries the proper zoning, land-use, and
Comprehensive Plan designations required for such development.

The project is also located on a major transit corridor, making the proposed use
appropriate.

(8) Any other conditions as may be stipulated and made a requirement in granting any
application for a conditional use, when it is considered necessary to further the intent
and general welfare, including but not limited to:
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 56

a.) Limitations on the hours of business operations.
b.) Limitations on the number of occupants of any building at any one time.

Not applicable.

B. MAJOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

Section 32-174(h) specifies the following criteria shall be utilized in the review and evaluation of
applications for Major Development Review approval:

1. Natural Environment

The site is the Palmetto Trailer Park with 130 mobile homes and the Paddock Trailer Park with
61 mobile homes. The majority of the mobile homes have since been removed. There are no
rare, historical or valuable trees on the property.

2. Open Space

A recreational area with recreation room, swimming pool, tot lot, Jacuzzi and gazebo are
proposed to serve the residents. 40.09% of the site will be landscaped. 9.33% of the site is
non-pervious open space, including sidewalks, decks, and open space area for residents use.
According to the landscaped plans, the grounds will be substantially landscaped with mature
trees, ornamental trees and shrubbery, such as, Royal Palms along South Federal Highway,
Live Oaks, Geiger and Poinciana trees and Coconut Palms exceeding the required height.

3. Circulation and Parking

Seven hundred and sixty-three (763) parking spaces are required for the development and 762
parking spaces proposed. There is one dead-end corridor which is prohibited by Section 32-
453(i)(4). The applicant requests this requirement and the one parking space deficiency be
waived as provided by Section 32-174(i) (1) of the PDD regulations.

4. Access Controls

The property will be gated for resident parking/ access by an entryway on NE 3rd Street. As
requested by the Fire Marshall, the applicant provides an additional access to NE 4th Street on
the north side of the property for emergency use only by the Fire Department and sanitation
vehicles. A Knox box key for Fire and Public Works Departments use will also be required at
this entrance.

The east entrance driveway from NE 3rd Street with 27 surface parking and ground floor parking
of the garage is designated for commercial use. A gate and arm to the east side
of the parking garage is proposed. Staff has requested and the developer has agreed to
remove to avoid dead end parking in the open surface parking lot if the gate arm were down.

5. Public Transportation

Public mass transit with a bus shelter will be available at the subject property on Federal
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 57

Highway.

6. Community Services

Three dumpster locations with masonry enclosures are proposed. The City Sanitation Division
will service the development at a central location within the entrance of the site.

Fire hydrants to serve the development and designated fire lanes are not shown but will be
required. Prior to the issuance of the building permit, the developer must provide a hydraulic
analysis of water system, including a fire flow test, to determine if system is adequate to provide
required fire and domestic use demand.

In addition to the sidewalk and colonnade along North Federal Highway, the applicant is
required to construct a 5 foot concrete sidewalk along NE 3rd Street, NE 3rd Avenue, NE 4th
Court and NE 4th Street adjacent to the development. The proposal includes the required
sidewalks with curbs and gutters.

7. Drainage

Paved areas are proposed to have underground catch basins for stormwater runoff. Storm
water must be retained on site. Drainage calculations for both sites will be required at time of
permit. The applicant will be required to comply with all DPEP regulations and City criteria to
retain 5 year 1 hour storm water onsite.

8. Buildings and Other Structures

The proposed development consists of 372 apartment units in a 6 story building, with an
integrated 6 story parking garage with 672 parking spaces and recreational areas. The
Developer has not designed the project to meet LEED standards or similar certification.
However, Staff is recommending that the project be LEED certified.
9. Concurrency Evaluation

According to Article V, Section 32-782 determination of concurrency must occur prior to the
approval of a building permit.
Staff has conducted a concurrency evaluation of the project relative to its impact on water,
sewer, solid waste, drainage, and recreation facilities. Staff has determined that concurrency
requirements for water, sewer, drainage, solid waste, and recreation facilities have been met.
Water, sewer and drainage compliance are all subject to submission of hydraulic analysis and
drainage calculations to the satisfaction of the City

Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit. The City reserves the right to require
upgrade to the system if it is determined the system is inadequate or will be severely impacted
by development.

The developer has submitted an Impact Evaluation Report as required by Section 32-788 that
addresses each issue. The following is a summary of the expected impacts to the various public
utilities for reference.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 58

Potable Water - According to the criteria in the Impact Evaluation Report, the development will
generate the need for approximately 77,600 gallons of potable water per day. The City Water
Plant is expandable to 15 MGD (Million Gallons per Day). The plant‟s current capacity is 9
MGD. The City‟s current demand is about 6 MGD. There is sufficient capacity to maintain this
development.

Wastewater - The City has a Large User Agreement with City of Hollywood and several other
communities for wastewater treatment. The City recently obtained additional capacity at the
sewer plant.

The City‟s current committed capacity is 7.85 MGD and the City‟s total flow is 7.25 MGD
according to the applicant, based on the proposed commercial / residential use, the wastewater
demand for the site is 69,840 gallons per day. There is sufficient capacity to maintain this
development.

The developer will be required to pay for their share of additional sewage demand from the
Hollywood Wastewater Treatment Plan as a result of their development. This amount is based
on the estimated gallons of sewage demand in applicant‟s Impact Study and the City‟s cost to
obtain additional capacity at the Plant. Should the actual sewage amount generated be greater
than specified in the applicant‟s Impact Study, the developer will be required to pay the actual
cost to the City.

Transportation System – The applicant was required to submit a Traffic Study and Trips Run
Report pursuant to Section 32-788 (g) for an analysis of the impact of the development as
related to current and projected roadway usage and design capacities. The City‟s consultant for
this project, Michael Miller & Associates reviewed the Study. The Traffic Study and consultant‟s
report has been placed in the Additional Materials Folder. According to the consultant, since the
existing mobile homes units and 2800 square feet of commercial use will be demolished, the
project will generate a minor amount of new traffic to the roadway system. The project would
result in a net increase of 1843 more vehicle trips per day and 206 AM Peak Hour trips and 110
PM Peak Hour trips. As the City is within a designated Urban Infill area, development projects
may not be denied based upon concurrency, however they are required to mitigate their
impacts. The applicant will be mitigating its impacts as outlined in the attached Development
Agreement.
The owner has agreed to pay for any future exactions within three (3) years of the issuance of
the certificate of occupancy for the development established by the City to fund infrastructure
improvements including but not limited to traffic and transit improvements as more specifically
described in the attached Development Agreement between the Developer and the City.

School Facilities

The City‟s Zoning and Land Development Code, Chapter 32, Section 32-788(i), Impact
Evaluation Statement, requires that impacts on school facilities be considered for new
development. Therefore, the applicant was required to provide an Impact Analysis regarding
the project‟s impact on the public school system.

The Schools impacted by the proposed development are Hallandale Elementary, which is
overcrowded, McNicols Middle and Hallandale High School. The Broward County School Board
calculated the potential student impact of the proposed development. The School Board
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 59

concluded that based on the current land use designation which would permit 134 garden
apartment units and generate 80 students, the proposal to build high rise units would potentially
generate 17 students, a net decrease of 63 students (11 elementary, 3 middle and 3 high). Due
to a net decrease in students, the Developer will not be required to mitigate any students.

10. Community Meeting

In accordance with City‟s Administrative Policy #2014. 011, the developer held two Community
Meetings on May 21, 2007 and on July 25, 2007 to present the project to the community in a
public forum. The meetings were advertised and notices mailed to all area residents and owners
within 1,000 feet from the site.

11. Financial Impact

The project‟s anticipated value at build out is $67.5 million. It is expected the proposed
development will generate approximately $1,209,498 in real estates taxes, of which
approximately $956,000 will go to the CRA.

12. PRD Design Guidelines

Properties zoned PRD are also subject to the adopted Design Guidelines for the PRD Overlay
District. The proposed development has been found to be generally consistent with the
established design guidelines for properties zoned PRD.

13. Master Plan

The proposed Park Central development is located along the North Federal Highway Corridor,
which has been identified as a focus for redevelopment. The subject site has been designed to
take proactive steps towards responsible urban form and function. The master plan encourages
the following design principles: redevelopment of surface parking lots, inclusion of public/civic
space, pedestrian/vehicular connectivity, urban landscape materials and flexibility to create
unique development. Most of these objectives have been incorporated into the design of the
Hallandale Park Central development. In addition, the developer met with the City‟s Master Plan
consultant to address urban design features.

The project includes a 10 feet wide covered colonnade and an expanded sidewalk along North
Federal Highway totaling approximately 17 feet in width in concert with the Master

Plan‟s objective sidewalks along the major corridors. Royal Palms twenty five inches (25”) in
height line the project‟s frontage creating an urban rather than suburban landscape theme
consistent with the Master Plan‟s objectives for urban form and design. Store fronts along the
frontage lines create a visual and aesthetic presence to attract pedestrians.

14. Green Building

The developer has not designed the project to require LEED certification. However, Staff is
recommending that the project incorporate LEED/Green Building principles to be LEED certified
or similar.
______________________________________________________________________
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 60

VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
______________________________________________________________________

In furtherance of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, Zoning
Code and other applicable City provisions and based upon the findings of facts contained
herein, staff recommends approval of the following subject to all of the conditions of approval
outlined in the attached Development Agreement:

3. Resolution adopting the Park Central Plat.

4. Resolution assigning 257 Residential Flexibility Units to the project.

In addition, staff recommends the City Commission approve Second Reading of the following
related Ordinances:

5. Ordinance changing the land use of the subject property on the City‟s Future Land Use
Map from Residential Medium Density to Residential High Density-2. (The City
Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on January 22, 2008).

6. Ordinance changing the zoning of the subject property from RM-18 District to RM-HD2
District. (The City Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on January 22,
2008).

7. Ordinance applying the Planned Development Overlay District to the subject property.
(The City Commission approved First Reading of this Ordinance on April 16, 2008).

8. Ordinance vacating certain portions of NE 4th Street, NE 4th Avenue and adjacent
alleyways within the Hollywood Pines Estates Subdivision. (The City Commission
approved First Reading of this Ordinance on April 16, 2008).

Approval of the Agreement should be contingent on the applicant finalizing and executing the
Agreement with the City within a period not exceeding 60 days from the date of the subject
application approval and the City Attorney's concurrence of the final document. Further, the
City Commission should authorize the City Manager to complete any final negotiations with the
applicant and execute the Development Agreement.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 61

Prepared By: _______________________________________
Christy Dominguez, Director of Planning & Zoning

Reviewed:

_______________________ ______________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

____ Approved ____ Denied ____ Hold for Discussion

Comments:
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
CD/sj

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 62

12I. HALLANDALE BEACH, FLORIDA
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 2, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Richard D. Cannone, Development Services Director

SUBJECT: Application # 64-07-DB by Taubco Corp.
Hallandale Square Major Development Plan
600 East Hallandale Beach Boulevard

I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION

APPLICANT

600 Hallandale, LLC., Owner/Applicant
Taubco Co., Developer

PROJECT NAME

Hallandale Square

REQUEST

The applicant is requesting Major Development Review approval pursuant to Section 32-782 of
the Zoning and Land Development Code in order to construct Hallandale Square, a five story
commercial building containing retail, restaurants and a cinema with a total of 380,000 square
feet in area.

LOCATION

Gulfstream Promenade Shopping Center.
The property is located at 600 East Hallandale Beach Boulevard

PLANNING DISTRICT

Gulfstream

PARCEL SIZE

The parcel is 8.62 acres.
Central City Business District; Planned Redevelopment Overlay (PRD) District; and the Planned
Development Overlay (PDD) District.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 63

EXISTING USE

A 59,650 square foot commercial shopping center.

PROPOSED USE

A commercial vertical mall with a total of 380,000 square feet in area consisting of 320,000
square foot of retail, 28,000 square foot of restaurant and a 749 seat cinema and a (5) five level
parking garage with 4 mezzanine levels.

SURROUNDING ZONING

North - CCB (Central City Business) District
South - CRA (Commercial Recreational Active) District and PLAC (Planned Local Activity
Center)
East - CCB (Central City Business) District
West - B-G (Business General) District across South Federal Highway

II. LAND USE HISTORY

Previous Request

On April 30, 2003 the Planning and Zoning Board recommended approval of Application #81-
02-Z by GPH Holdings to apply the Planned Development Overlay (PDD) District to the
property. The application considered by the Board consisted of a one story retail building with
11,187 square feet and a 5 story office building with 46, 800 square feet in gross floor area.
After the Board meeting, the applicant decided to amend the proposal. The application was
placed on hold. The applicant amended the proposal to reduce the one story building to 10,750
square feet and the medical office building to three stories with 36,330 square feet in floor area,
for a total of 47,080 square feet in gross floor area. On March 16, 2004, the City Commission
approved the Major Development Plan for the aforementioned proposal (Application #80-02-
DB).

On April 7, 2004, the Commission also approved an ordinance applying the Planned
Development Overlay district to the subject property. The intent of this overlay district is to
supplement and modify the provisions of they underlying zoning district to encourage
development and redevelopment through flexible development standards.

On June 1, 2004, the Commission approved vacating certain roadway reservation, easements
and modifying non-vehicular access lines within the Promenade at Hallandale Plat.

Subsequently, on June 21, 2004, Robert Lechter, representing GPH Holdings filed an
amendment to Application #80-02-DB which significantly deviated from the approved Major
Development Plan described above. The three story office building proposed at the south end of
the property was eliminated and a one story bank/retail building with 10,000 square and a one
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 64

story CVS Pharmacy with a drive thru 14,400 square feet in floor area was proposed. On
October 18, 2005 the City Commission denied the revised application.

On June 21, 2005, the City Commission approved a request by GPH Holding for an extension of
the Major Development Review Approval of Application #80-02 DB to build 47,080 square feet
of commercial space including the 3 story medical office building and a 10,750 square foot bank
with drive thru. The project was not built and the approvals expired on March 16, 2006

City Actions Related to the Area:

In 1992, the City created the Hallandale Financial District Corridor Plan as a mechanism to
promote redevelopment within the Hallandale Beach Boulevard Corridor with high density taller
buildings close to the road in a more urban design. The City Commission on October 7, 2003
authorize the preparation of an Ordinance to apply the Planned Redevelopment Overlay District
to this area and South Federal Highway in order to further redevelopment of the Corridors.

Related History

The Promenade at Hallandale Plat is restricted to the present development of 59,650 square
feet. Also the non vehicular access lines (NVL) within the Plat must be modified to coincide with
the proposed access driveways. The applicant will be required to file a Delegation Request with
the City and the County to amend the present square footage and NVL line restrictions.
Approvals must be granted and recorded before a building permit may be issued for the
proposed project.

On October 17, 2003 the previous owner, GPH Holdup entered into an agreement with Alan
Kornbluh for Sage Plaza. The City was not party to this agreement. The purpose of the
Agreement was to provide a shared access driveway between the two properties. The
Agreement runs with the land.

The Agreement:

1. allowed GPH to remove the fence between the two properties.
2. provides for a crosswalk/walkway between the two properties.
3. a minimal driveway connection between GPH and Sage Parcels to be improved by GPH.
4. GPH has the right at their expense, to close the western driveway at Sage.
5. GPH will provide for customer parking for Sage on their parcel.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 65

III. DETAILS OF THE APPLICATION

Development Details

The applicant‟s plans depict the following:

1. A five story commercial building consisting of 320,000 square feet of retail and 28,000
square feet of restaurant space and a 32,000 square foot/749 seat cinema. The overall
height of the building is 128 feet. The City Commission has the discretion to permit up to
450 ft. for PDD properties.

2. Parking for the building is contained in a detached 5 story parking garage connected to
the commercial building by 4 elevated walkways. The parking garage has entrances
located from South Federal Highway, Hibiscus Road and the east side of the building.

3. The retail space is on floors one thru four. The cinema and restaurants are on level five
of the building.

4. 2,267 parking spaces are proposed (1,534 spaces are required).

5. 12.2 % of the site will be landscaped including above ground landscaped areas. (15% is
the minimum required).

6. 13.29% of the site is designed with pedestrian plazas and walkable space.

7. A common shared accessway with Sage Plaza from the east driveway.

OTHER SITE DETAILS

A shared access driveway to Sage Plaza is provided approximately 220 feet south of Hallandale
Beach Boulevard on the east side of the building extension. In addition, the western driveway
along East Hallandale Beach Boulevard to Sage Plaza would be closed as provided in the
agreement Sage and GPH. NE/SE 8th Avenues cannot be aligned as 33.47 feet of the Sage
Plaza property would be required to properly align the street.

IV. INTERDEPARTMENT REVIEW SUMMARY

Comments/issues identified by the Development Review Committee (DRC) and the City‟s
Master Plan Consultant EDAW were discussed with the applicant during DRC review of the
application. Some of these comments/issues have been incorporated into the required
Development Agreement between the City and developer for the Major Development Plan
application.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 66

In addition to the DRC meetings, EDAW, City Staff and the Applicant met on a number of
different occasions to ensure the architectural and urban design elements for this project were
consistent with the City vision to create a true “Town Center”. It is Staff‟s opinion as well as the
consultant‟s that the Applicant has met many of the design concepts/elements outlined in the
findings of the Master plan presented to the City Commission on February 27, 2008. Those
elements, will serve as a catalyst in creating a vibrant, mixed use, sustainable pedestrian-
oriented urban environment with an appealing character and sense of place.

The DRC recommends approval of the Major Development application, subject to conditions as
enumerated in the proposed Development Agreement.
_________________

V. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONSISTENCY

Staff finds that this development is consistent with the City‟s Comprehensive Plan. Specifically,
the General Commercial designation permits office and retail uses and mixed uses. All of the
uses proposed by the applicant are permitted under the land use category. Additionally, the
proposed project will assist in furthering the following policies and objectives of the City‟s
Comprehensive Plan:

Policy 1.2.3: South Federal Highway: The City shall utilize the South Federal Highway
Neighborhood Plan as a guide in the development and redevelopment of the South
Federal Highway area.

Policy 1.5.8: Development themes for land use along Hallandale Beach Boulevard and
US 1 shall be incorporated into the Land Development Code in the form of Special
Zoning Districts that redefine these corridors as focal areas of the City. In conjunction
with development of these Special Zoning Districts, site development standards will be
revised to include innovative approaches to site and building design shall be
implemented by 2000.

Policy 1.10.4: The City shall maintain innovative land development regulations that
encourage mixed-use developments and incorporate site design and planning
techniques that will enhance the quality of large scale developments or redevelopment
areas.

Objective 1:16: Urban Infill and Redevelopment: Establish criteria which encourage
development of urban infill and urban redevelopment area(s) to promote economic
development, increase housing opportunities and maximize the use of existing public
facilities and services.

Policy 1.16.1: Increase economic development and employment opportunities within
urban infill and urban redevelopment area.

Policy 1.16.3: The Hallandale Beach Land Use Plan shall encourage mix use
developments within urban infill and urban redevelopment area(s).
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 67

Furthermore, the retail/commercial uses, which are located on a transit corridor, will provide a
number of employment opportunities and increase the economic development in the area. The
proposal is also consistent with the City‟s adopted Master Redevelopment Plan for Hallandale
Beach Boulevard and with the proposed new City Wide Master Plan and Strategic Plan
presently being developed by EDAW Consulting Firm.

VI. APPLICATION CODES AND ORDINANCES

1. The subject property is zoned Central City Business (CCB) District. Planned
Redevelopment overlay District (PRD), and Planned Development Overlay District
(PDD) are also assigned to the property.

The applicant proposes to build five story retail, restaurant and movie theater
building and a 5 story parking garage on the property. The proposed use is
permitted by the underlying and overlay zoning districts of the property.

2. Section 32-174 (i), Planned Development district (PDD) provides assignment of PDD as
an optional zoning procedure to permit site design flexibility, greater land use intensity
in order to encourage high quality innovative development and, promote its most
appropriate use consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies. Development in PDD is
governed by a development agreement pursuant to Section 32-174(d) (2).

All site development standards in a PDD are negotiated between the City and the
applicant as part of the development process. Development must be in
compliance with the site plan as approved by the City Commission.

3. Section 32-174(i) requires all Planned Development Districts must contain a minimum of
1.5 acres of land under unified control.

The subject property is 8.62 acre, therefore, it meets the minimum parcel size
required. PDD zoning was applied to the property on April 4, 2004.

4. As mentioned previously, the City Commission may waive specified setbacks, floor area,
landscaping, or parking requirements in lieu of a variance within areas zoned PDD.

Section 32-174(i)(3) permits smaller yard areas than those of the underlying zoning
district where the use is appropriate for a particular project minimum setbacks in PPD
may be considered by utilizing one of the following methods:

a. the applicable setbacks of the underlying zoning
b. established setback pattern of adjacent property and property
within 500 feet of the PDD site.
c. as a combination of (a.) and (b.) above utilizing good planning practices such as
considering buffering, service areas, access for fire fighting equipment and
containment of fire.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 68

PRD overlay zoning allows a maximum of 15 feet front yard setback permits a zero
setback on the side Interior property line and 15 feet on the corner sides.

The proposed building is designed with a colonnade setback 15 feet from
Hallandale Beach Boulevard and 10 feet from Federal Highway. However, portions
of the building are setback beyond the maximum allowed. In addition, Properties
zoned CCB require a minimum of 15 feet to the rear yard. The proposed garage
structure is setback 5 feet 11 inches from the rear property line (Hibiscus Road).
When the Code required setbacks are applied, the proposal is deficient as follows:

SETBACKS REQUIRED PROVIDED DEFICIENCY

Front
E. Hallandale Beach 5‟-0” 15‟-0”(Column Line)
15‟-0”(Max) 31‟-1” (Maximum) 16‟1”

Rear
Hibiscus Street 15‟-0”(Min) 5‟-0”(Minimum) 10 ft.

Side Street
(Federal Highway) 10‟-0”(Column Line)
15‟-0”(Max) 32‟-5”(Maximum) 22‟-5”

Side (East) 0‟-0” 43‟-10” -0-

Staff has no objections to the above requested waiver as the applicant has incorporated
many of the public realm improvements discussed in the Master Plan.
5. Section 32-455( c ) requires one parking space for every 300 square feet of retail, one
parking space for every 100 square feet of restaurant and one parking space for every
four seats in a movie theater.

When the above referenced parking standards are applied, 1,534 parking spaces
are required for the commercial uses proposed.

The applicant provides a 5 level parking garage with 4 mezzanine levels in a
portion of the structure with a total of 2,267 parking spaces for a surplus of 735
parking spaces. The parking requirements are summarized below:

PARKING: REQUIRED PROVIDED DEFICIENCY

1. Retail (320,000/300) 1,066.67 -0-

2. Restaurant
(28,000/100) 280 -0-

3. Theater (1 per 4 seats) 18,725 -0-
32,000 square feet
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 69

4. Grand Total 1,534 2,267 -0-

The proposed parking exceeds the minimum required by 735 spaces.

6. Section 32-456 and 32- 457 requires a minimum of 2 loading spaces 12 feet in width by
50 feet in length for the retail component of the building.

The applicant provides five loading spaces located within the building accessible
from Hallandale Beach Boulevard.

7. Section 32-453 specifies the design requirements for parking space dimensions, and
aisle design standards.

The proposal meets all parking space dimensions and aisle design standards
required by Code.

8. Section 32-159(d)(5) requires a minimum of 15% of properties zoned B-L District be
landscaped.

40,067 square feet (11.39%) of the site will be landscaped at ground level and
4,686 square feet (1.33%) will be landscaped above ground level for a total of
12.72% landscape credit. Therefore, the proposal is deficient by 2.28%.

9. Section 32-284(c)(3) requires one tree for every 1500 square feet of lot area. Section
32-285(c) (2) requires a minimum of 15 feet in height trees for properties zoned
commercial and no more than 50% of the required trees may be palms.

According to the above criteria, 234 trees are required. The applicant proposes to
install 186 credited trees, including 18 Royal Palms to be planted off site along the
south boundary of Hibiscus Street, resulting in a deficiency of 48 trees. The
Applicant has agreed to work with Staff to modify the species and reduce the
deficiency as much as possible.

10. Section 32-176(g)(4) requires building facades shall occupy at least 60% of the street
frontage but no more than 80% on any individual street.

The proposed building façade occupies a length of 89.6% along Hallandale Beach
Boulevard, exceeding the maximum allowed by 9.6%. The building façade length
along Federal Highway is 86.50%, exceeding the maximum allowed by 6.5%. Staff
has no abjections to the requested waiver.

______________________________________________________________________
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 70

VII. REVIEW CRITERIA
______________________________________________________________________

Major Development Review

Section 32-787 specifies the following criteria shall be utilized in the review and evaluation of
applications for Major Development Review approval:

1. Natural Environment

Subject property is the site of the Gulfstream Promenade Shopping Center. The existing
development will be demolished. There are no rare or historical trees on the property.

2. Open Space

The minimum landscaping area required by Code is 15%. The applicant‟s proposal
provides 40,067 square feet (11.39%) landscape at ground level. In addition, 9,372
square feet of landscaping is proposed above grade. Non-ground level landscaping is
credited at 50% equating to 4,686 square feet or an additional 1.33 % of landscaping for
a total credit of 12.72%.

Although the proposal is deficient in landscaping by 2.28%, the applicant provides an
additional 47,403 square feet (13.48%) of open space consisting of pedestrian walkways
and urban plazas which will provide additional urban space for pedestrians and visitors
to the site.

According to the landscaped plans, the grounds and non-ground level planting areas will
be extensively landscaped with mature trees, ornamental trees and shrubbery. However,
the numbers of proposed palm species do not meet the City‟s total credited tree
requirements. The applicant has agreed to change the species or add additional palms
to meet the minimum tree requirements as stipulated in the development Agreement.

3. Circulation and Parking

1,534 parking spaces are required for the development and 2,267spaces are proposed
resulting in a surplus of 733 parking spaces.

4. Access Control

The project has 5 access points. Direct access to Federal Highway is a right in/right out
only driveway between the commercial building and parking garage and via Hibiscus
Road which will also be restricted to right in/right out. Direct access is also provided
from East Hallandale Beach Boulevard via a private roadway offset from NE 8 Avenue
on the east side of the building. This driveway is four (4) lanes with one inbound (south)
lane and three (3) outbound (north) lanes. An access driveway to the Sage property is
proposed approximately 220 feet south of the Hallandale Beach Boulevard entrance
driveway connecting the properties for cross parking and pedestrian crossing.
Circulation within the parking garage has been designed to allow for free movement
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 71

within the structure with no dead end corridors. Loading and service areas are also
accessible via a new driveway from East Hallandale Beach Boulevard.

5. Public Transportation

Broward County, Miami-Dade County and the City bus services the Federal Hwy and
Hallandale Beach Blvd. Several bus stop exists adjacent along Hallandale Beach
Boulevard and Federal Hwy and the vicinity of the project site. Significant transit
improvements will be made in the area as part of the Village at Gulfstream Park project,
including a bus super stop proposed to be located to the south of the subject project.

6. Community Services
The building will have a trash enclosure in a service area on the ground floor of the
building accessible from East Hallandale Beach Boulevard. The location was acceptable
for service by the City sanitation trucks provided the developer contracts with the City for
service by a separate agreement and the service area is designed with a minimum of 25
foot ceiling clearance for dumpster pickup. The developer has agreed to this
requirement.

7. Drainage

Paved areas are proposed to have underground catch basins for storm water runoff as
needed. Storm water must be retained on site. Drainage calculations will be required at
time of permitting. The applicant will be
required to comply with DEP regulations and City criteria to retain a 5-year 1-hour storm
on site.

8. Building and Other Structures

The development will consist of 320,000 square feet of retail, 28,000 square feet of
restaurant, a 749 seat cinema in a 5 story building and a 5 story parking garage with 4
mezzanine levels for a total of 9 floors of parking. The overall height of the building is
128 feet. Three hundred fifty (350) feet is the maximum height allowed.

9. Concurrency Evaluation

According to Article V Section 32-782, determination of concurrency must occur prior to
the approval of a building permit.

Staff has conducted a concurrency evaluation of the project relative to its impact on water,
sewer, solid waste and drainage. Staff has determined that concurrency requirements for water,
sewer, drainage and solid waste facilities have been met. Water, sewer and drainage
calculations must be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a
building permit. The City reserves the right to require upgrades to the
water, sewer, and drainage existing infrastructure if it is determined the systems are inadequate
or will be severely impacted by the development.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 72

Potable Water - According to the criteria in the Impact Evaluation Report, the development will
generate the need for approximately 90,000 gallons of potable water per day. The City Water
Plant is expandable to 15 MGD (Million Gallons per Day). The plant‟s current capacity is 9
MGD. The City‟s current demand is about 6 MGD. There is sufficient capacity to maintain this
development.

Wastewater - The City has a Large User Agreement with City of Hollywood and several other
communities for wastewater treatment. The City recently obtained additional capacity at the
sewer plant.

The City‟s current committed capacity is 7.85 MGD and the City‟s total flow is 7.25 MGD
according to the applicant, based on the proposed commercial / cinema use, the wastewater
demand for the site is 65,000 gallons per day. There is sufficient capacity to maintain this
development.

Transportation System – The applicant was required to submit a traffic Study and Trips Run
Report pursuant to Section 32-788 (g) for an analysis of the impact of the development as
related to current and projected roadway usage and design capacities. The City‟s consultant for
this project, Michael Miller & Associates, reviewed the Study. According to the consultant, the
project will generate a significant amount of new traffic to the roadway system (7400 new daily
weekday trips/ 9400 weekend trips/ 962pm peak hour trips) after adjusting for the existing
shopping center trips. As the City is within a designated Urban Infill area, development projects
may not be denied based upon concurrency, however they are required to mitigate their
impacts. The applicant will be mitigating its impacts as outlined in the recommendation section
of this report.

The owner has agreed to pay for any future fees within three (3) years of the issuance of the
Certificate of Occupancy established by the City to fund infrastructure improvements including
but not limited to traffic and transit improvements as more specifically described in the attached
Development Agreement between the Developer and the City.

Community Meeting

The developer held a Community Meeting on January 15, 2007 to present the project to the
community in a public forum. The meeting was advertised on January 12, 2007and notices were
mailed to all area residents and owners within 1,000 feet from the site; in accordance with City‟s
Administrative Policy #2014. 011.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 73

Financial Impact

The project‟s anticipated value at build out is $85 million. It is expected the proposed
development will generate approximately $1,708,250.00 in real estates taxes.

PRD Design Guidelines

Master Plan

The subject site lies within the neighborhood planning area known as the Hallandale Beach
Town Center. The Town Center planning area also includes the Villages at Gulfstream as well
as the City‟s municipal complex. In addition, the proposed “Hallandale Square” development is
located along the Hallandale Beach corridor, which has been identified as a focus for
redevelopment. The intersection of Federal Highway and Hallandale Beach Boulevard is the
gateway to the City and in the heart of Hallandale Beach. The subject site has been designed
to take proactive steps towards responsible urban form and function.

The master plan encourages the following design principles: redevelopment of surface parking
lots, inclusion of public/civic space, pedestrian/vehicular connectivity, urban landscape
materials, green building practices, and flexibility to create unique developments. These
objectives have been incorporated into the design of the “Hallandale Square” development at
the design stage of the project. The applicant‟s development team has worked closely with the
City‟s Master Plan consultant and City staff to integrate these objectives seamlessly into the
development program.

The existing development consists of a suburban shopping center surrounded by surface
parking. The development was realized when combining the gateway location with the flexibility
provided in the Planned Redevelopment Overlay (PRD) District and the urban design guidelines
set forth in the Master Plan. The project includes an expanded sidewalk in concert with the
Master Plan‟s objective of a 20-foot minimum sidewalk along the major corridors. A covered
colonnade extends from the building providing cover and connectivity along the periphery of the
site. To complete the pedestrian experience, street trees will line the project‟s frontage creating
an urban rather than suburban landscape theme consistent with the Master Plan‟s objectives for
urban form and design. Also, store fronts along the frontage lines create a visual and aesthetic
presence to attract and ultimately gather pedestrians at one of the three urban plaza spaces,
complete with water features.

In addition, both the HDR traffic study and pending master plan contemplates neighborhood
roadway connectivity with major transit corridors. The proposed development plan has been
designed to accommodate various pending options to increase this connectivity within the
subject area.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 74

Green Development

The applicant has agreed to design and construct the development utilizing the principles of
sustainable or “green” design for the benefit of the community; the future building occupants,
tenants and owners; and the global environment in general. Examples of such sustainable or
„green development systems, products and practices that might be incorporated into the design
and construction of the proposed Development could include, by way of example: reduction of
pollution and land development impacts from automobile use; reuse and recycling of stormwater
for non-potable uses such as landscape and irrigation and custodial uses; and high
performance, energy efficient building technologies and systems (HVAC, lighting, windows,
etc.). The type of “green” certification is outlined in the attached Development Agreement and
will be required prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy.

______________________________________________________________________

VIII. STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS
______________________________________________________________________

As previously stated the objective of the PDD is to provide an optional zoning procedure to
permit site design flexibility and greater land use intensity and density in order to encourage
high-quality, innovative development that is consistent with comprehensive plan policies,
applicable city development and redevelopment plans, and desired development patterns and
land uses in an overlay zone that encourages flexibility in the design and negotiation of land
development in order to promote the most appropriate use while allowing flexibility in
development. The adoption of the PDD for this property was predicated on the City‟s desire to
promote the redevelopment of underutilized properties in need of revitalization through flexible
development standards.

As outlined in this memo, Staff has conducted a comprehensive analysis of the subject
application and has determined the applicant‟s proposal meets the general requirements for
Major Development Plan approval relative to concurrency and other Code requirements subject
to special conditions in addition to the Code mandated regulations. The proposed conditions are
summarized below and on the attached proposed Development Agreement and should be
imposed to assure a quality development and mitigate any negative impacts.

In furtherance of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Goals, Objectives and Policies, Zoning
Code and other applicable City provisions and based upon the findings of facts contained
herein, staff recommends approval subject to the conditions of approval as outlined in the
attached Development Agreement.

Should the City Commission concur with the Development Agreement as drafted, approval
should be contingent on the applicant executing the Agreement with the City within a period not
exceeding 60 days from the date of the application approval and the City Attorney‟s
concurrence of the final document. Further, the City Commission should authorize the City
Manager to complete any final negotiations with the applicant and execute the Development
Agreement.
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 75

Prepared by:

________________________
Christy Dominguez
Planning and Zoning Director

Reviewed:

_______________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____ Approved _____ Denied _____ Hold for Discussion

Comments:
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________

CD/sj
cc:
Attachments

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 76

12J. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 6, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: Thomas A. Magill, Chief of Police

SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Creating Article VII,
Inclusive of Sections 28-226 Through 28-230, of Chapter 28, Traffic and Motor
Vehicles, and Boats, Article VII Automated Enforcement of Certain Traffic
Violations of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Hallandale Beach, Requiring
Adherence to Red Light Traffic Control Signals; Requiring a Motor Vehicle Owner
to Pay a Civil Fee for a Motor Vehicle that Runs a Red Light; Allowing Traffic
Enforcement Photographic Systems to Record Violations of Red Light Traffic
Control Signals; Providing for Issuance of Civil Notices of Code Violation for
Such Violations; Providing for a Method for the Motor Vehicle Owner to Appeal a
Notice of Code Violation; Providing for Severability; Providing for Repeal of
Conflicting Ordinances; Providing an Effective Date. (Second Reading)

PURPOSE:

Approval of Ordinance on Second Reading enacting Hallandale Beach Code of Ordinances
Section 28-226 through 28-230 for Traffic Enforcement Photographic Systems.

BACKGROUND:

On June 4, 2008, the City Commission approved the Red Light Camera Enforcement Ordinance
on First Reading with a proposed change pertaining to mailing notifications of violations. The
City Attorney has made the requisite change and the Ordinance is submitted for Second
Reading.

RECOMMENDATION:

The City Commission approve the ordinance on Second Reading and authorize implementation
of the program.

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

___Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 77

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 78

12K. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 5, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: David Jove, City Attorney

SUBJECT: Ordinance Repealing Police Officers' and Firefighters' Board of Trustees

PURPOSE:

To adopt an Ordinance on Second Reading enacting section 2-40 to provide for the
appointment of two city commissioners to the City‟s Police Officers‟ and Firefighters‟ Board of
Trustees (the “Pension Board of Trustees”).

DISCUSSION

An ordinance amending Section 2-40 of the City‟s Code of Ordinances in order to provide for
two City Commissioners to serve as members of the Pension Board of Trustees in an ex-officio
capacity was adopted on First Reading on June 4, 2008. In order to avoid duplication in the
City‟s Code, the Pension Ordinance 2008-03, providing for two City Commissioners to serve as
members of the Pension Board of Trustees, shall also be repealed in the ordinance amending
Section 2-40.

RECOMMENDATION:

The City Commission adopt the Ordinance on Second Reading.

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 79

06/18/08
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 80

12L. CITY OF HALLANDALE BEACH
MEMORANDUM

DATE: June 6, 2008

TO: D. Mike Good, City Manager

FROM: E. Dent McGough, General Services Director/City Clerk

SUBJECT: An Ordinance of the City of Hallandale Beach, Florida, Amending the City Code
of Ordinance, Chapter 2, Administration, Article II “City Commission”, Section 2-
32 “Boards”; Providing for Conflicts; Providing for Severability; and Providing for
an Effective date (First Reading)

PURPOSE:

To adopt an Ordinance on First Reading amending Section 2-32 of the City Code pertaining to
the number of boards and committees on which a person may serve.

BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION:

On May 7, 2008 the City Commission discussed amending Section 2-32 of the City Code
pertaining to the number of boards and committees on which a person may serve. The
Commission directed that the Code be amended so that persons may serve, as follows:

1. On one Board and one Committee, or
2. On two Boards, or
3. On two Committees,

The City Attorney has amended Section 2-32 of the Code to incorporate this change. This
amendment is attached.

RECOMMENDATION:

The City Commission adopt on First Reading an Ordinance amending Section 2-32 of the City
Code to permit persons to serve on one Board and one Committee, or two Boards, or two
Committees, in any combination, provided the maximum membership is two Boards or two
Committees or one Board and one Committee and schedule Second Reading for August 6,
2008 at 10:30 A.M.

Reviewed:

_______________________________ __________
D. Mike Good, City Manager Date

_____Approved _____Disapproved _____Hold for Discussion
REGULAR AGENDA - June 18, 2008
Page 81

06/18/08