ViewOpen SOAR at Wichita State University Libraries Home Over the Counter
Description
ViewOpen SOAR at Wichita State University Libraries Home Over the Counter
Shared by: MikeJenny
-
Stats
- views:
- 3
- posted:
- 12/23/2010
- language:
- English
- pages:
- 1
Document Sample


A comparative analysis of regulated vs. deregulated emergency contraception
Alicia Nguyen, PA-S and Patricia Bunton, MS, PA-C
Department of Physician Assistant
College of Health Professions, Wichita State University
INTRODUCTION RESULTS DISCUSSION
The United States holds the highest rate for
• Eight of 12 studies showed that most This evidence-based review supports
unplanned teen pregnancies among all
developed countries in the world. It is apparent patients used EC correctly and had a good findings of other studies. It is interesting to
that abstinence and the utilization of understanding of the mechanism of note that although AEC allowed for earlier
contraceptives are vital in the reduction of and more timely access to EC, those who
action, the therapeutic uses and/or its
these numbers. Among all methods of had AEC were not using it when it was
adverse effects.
contraception, accessibility to emergency indicated because they did not believe they
contraception (EC) has been problematic, as were at an increased risk of pregnancy.
• Four studies indicated pregnancy rates Future comparison studies of the risks and
has education regarding its proper utilization.
Central arguments that have prevented in treatment groups were higher than benefits of EC need to include OTC and
deregulation of EC include concern that expected. Despite improved access and pharmacy access, as well as AEC, to
improved access would compromise routine an increase in EC usage, EC is still evaluate patient behavior when there are
contraceptive use and increase the incidence underused. various deregulated routes of EC access.
of risky behavior and/or sexually transmitted
diseases. Methods that would constitute as • One study showed that increased
deregulation or increased access of EC would access to EC negatively affected the use CONCLUSIONS
include direct supply by pharmacies or
of routine contraception.
emergency departments, advanced provision This review found no evidence to
of emergency contraception (AEC) by health indicate that regulated access to EC is
professionals and dispensing of EC over-the- •Two studies showed that, although AEC more advantageous than deregulated.
counter (OTC). led to a higher likelihood of timely use Deregulation and increased accessibility
METHODS compared to obtaining EC through clinic to EC leads to increased usage, promotes
This was an evidenced-based medicine
access, those who received AEC had timely access, does not compromise
literature review using Medline and higher rates of unprotected sex. Other routine use of contraceptives and is safe
included articles from 1998 to the present. studies have indicated that risky behavior enough to be dispensed OTC or in
Peer-reviewed articles were chosen based is not associated with increased EC advanced provisions. Of all deregulated
on the requirement that each article was to availability. methods of EC, AEC proves to be the
be retrospective, a randomized controlled best route to EC access. Women need to
trial, cohort, actual use study or a literature be educated on reproduction and fertility
review. The following key terms were used: risks so they understand the need and
emergency contraception, EC, Plan B, importance of EC availability and usage.
levonorgestrel, advanced provision, OTC,
over-the-counter, deregulation, regulation,
prescription. Twenty-six articles met the
criteria.
Get documents about "