Get documents about "Census 2010 Management Practice Test
Description
Census 2010 Management Practice Test document sample
Document Sample
Notes about this census:
Unity Consulting compiled the information in this census in 2009 and 2010 and distributed it June 2010.
The data source column indicates where we got the data for the survey:
A: Responses come from congregational responses to the 2009 congregational Policy Governance® survey.
B: Responses come from Unity Consulting's review of posts on the UUA's Policy Governance® list.
C: Responses come from information Unity Consulting gathered during the 2009 UU University Governance tra
D: Responses come from miscellaneous other sources.
We included all congregations that indicated they've at least started writing policy, even if they weren't comple
Because there are wide variations in the way congregations interpret Policy Governance®, we made no judgm
congregation indicated they are operating in or are in active transition to Policy Governance® or 'Carver-like' p
Policy Governance® is the registered service mark of John Carver; the authoritative website for the Policy Gov
District City State Congregation Membership Policy Gover
2009
Considering Comments
Since Yr.
Central MW Kenosha WI Bradford 112 2005
Community
Church UU
Central MW Elgin IL Unitarian 156 2003-2004
Universalist
Church of
Elgin
Central MW Oak Park IL Unity 530
Temple
Unitarian
Universalist
Congregatio
n
Central MW Appleton WI Fox Valley 599 2002
Unitairian
Universalist
Fellowship
Clara Barton Hamden CT Unitarian 421
Society of
New Haven
CT
Clara Barton West Hartford The 602 2000
Universalist
Church of
West
Hartford
Heartland Bloomington IN Unitarian 405 2003 Governance
Universalist Task Force
and Shaping
Church of Our Future
Bloomingto Together Task
n Force
Heartland MI
Bloomfield Hills Birmingham 498 2003
Unitarian
Church
Heartland Ann Arbor MI First 561 2007 There had
Unitarian been earlier
discussions of
Universalist Policy
Congregatio Governance
n of Ann and its
Arbor suitability for
our
congregation
by a
Governance
Task Force,
which issued a
final report in
January, 2002,
which
recommended
the creation of
a Program
Council.
Jos. PriestleyWashington DC Washington 150 2000
Ethical
Society
P
Jos. PriestleyWest Chester A Unitarian 181 2005
Fellowship
of West
Chester
Jos. PriestleyPhiladelphia PA First 188 2005
Unitarian
Church
Jos. PriestleyMedia PA Unitarian 264
Universalist
Church of
Delaware
County
Jos. PriestleyHarrisburg MD Unitarian 393 2003
Church of
Harrisburg
Jos. PriestleyColumbia MD Unitarian 415 2001
Universalist
Congregatio
n of
Columbia
Jos. Wilmington DE First 509 2001
Priestley Unitarian
Church of
Wilmington
Jos. PriestleyAnnapolis MD Unitarian 536
Universalist
Church of
Annapolis
Jos. PriestleyLancaster PA Unitarian 550
Universalist
Church of
Lancanster
Jos. PriestleyOakton VA Unitarian 661 2003
Universalist
Congregatio
n of Fairfax
Jos. PriestleyDevon PA Main Line 662 2004
Unitarian
Jos. PriestleyWashington DC All Souls 794
Church,
Unitarian
Jos. PriestleyArlington VA Unitarian 924
Universalist
Church of
Arlington
Mass Bay Newburyport MA First 364 2008 Vision/Mission
Religious process
produced
Society of realization that
Newburypor needed a
t different
structure to
make the
mission
happen
Mass Bay Concord MA First Parish 772 2000
in Concord
Metro NY Lincroft NJ Unitarian 280
Universalist
Congregatio
n of
Monmouth
County
Metro NY Princeton NJ Unitarian 387 2004
Universalist
Congregatio
n of
Princeton
Metro NY Rochester NY First 897 2003 The first
Unitarian committee
meetings
Church during our 2
Rochester, year transition
New York between called
ministers.
Mid-South Lawrencevill GA Unitarian 127 2009
e Universalist
Congregatio
n of
Gwinnett
Mid-South Atlanta GA Unitarian 737 2000
Universalist
Congregatio
n of Atlanta
UT
Mtn. Desert Salt Lake City First 348
Unitarian
Church of
Salt Lake
City
Mtn. Desert Denver CO First 576 2001
Universalist
Church of
Denver
Mtn. Desert Albuquerque NM First 753
Unitarian
Church of
Albuquerqu
e
N. NE Nashua NH Unitarian 287 2004
Universalist
Church of
Nashua
Ohio-Meadvl Kent OH Unitarian 205 2007
Universalist
Church of
Kent
Ohio-Meadvl Pittsburgh PA First 416 2003
Unitarian
Church
OH
Ohio-Meadvl Shaker Heights First 429 2006
Unitarian
Church of
Cleveland
Ohio-Meadvl Rocky River OH West Shore 552 2000
Unitarian
Universalist
Church
Ohio-Meadvl Columbus OH First 680 2006 Staff
Unitarian turnovers
prevented
Universalist progress in
Church of much 2007,
Columbus 2008, or 2009
Pacific Cent San Mateo CA Unitarian 241
Universalist
s of San
Mateo
Pacific Cent San Jose CA First 278 2004
Unitarian
Church of
San Jose
Pacific Cent Santa Rosa CA Unitarian 2006 Not sure.
Universalist Coming out of
the work of the
Congregatio "Growth Task
n, Santa Force" that
Rosa preceded my
arrival here.
Pacific Cent Oakland CA First 310
Unitarian
Church of
Oakland
Pacific Cent Kensington CA Unitarian 507
Universalist
Church of
Berkeley
Pacific NW Oregon City OR Atkinson 204 2008 Our Board
Memorial invited Rev.
Robert Latham
Church to inform the
congregation
about the
concept. We
had great
attendance at
the workshop
he gave, and
the agreement
was made that
this was the
way we
wanted to
move
Pacific NW Bellingham WA Bellingham 305 2005-06 Not sure
Unitarian
Fellowship
Pacific NW Spokane WA Unitarian 346
Universalist
Church of
Spokane
Pacific NW Eugene OR The 386 2005 Our leaders
Unitarian have been
studying about
Universalist the
Church in congregational
Eugene, size transitions
Oregon and
governance
changes for
many years,
and
generations of
leaders.
Pacific NW Bellevue WA East Shore 671
Unitarian
Church
Pacific NW Seattle WA University 795
Unitarian
Church
Pacific NW Portland OR First 1080 2000 After
Unitarian significant
growth we
Church of needed a
Portland governance
system that
allowed us to
clarify roles
and
responsibilities
.
Pacific SW Canoga ParkCA Emerson 128
Unitarian
Universalist
Church
Pacific SW Prescott AZ Granite 151 not sure
Peak
Unitarian
Universalist
Congregatio
n
Pacific SW Thousand Oaks
CA Canejo 201 2003 Not sure.
Valley
Unitarian
Universalist
Fellowship
Pacific SW San Luis Obispo –
CA Unitarian 231 2004
Universalist
Fellowship
of San Luis
Obispo
County
Pacific SW Tucson AZ Unitarian 282
Universalist
Church of
Tuscon
Pacific SW Phoenix AZ Unitarian 304 2007 Began
Universalist transition, in
discussion
Congregatio only, in 2007,
n of prior to my
Phoenix ministry. We
are not using
Carver's
model of
Policy
Governance
exclusively,
but using Dan
Hotchkiss
model.
Pacific SW Chandler AZ Valley 343 2004 Started with a
Unitarian visit/workshop
by Rob Eller-
Universalist Isaacs
Church
Pacific SW San Diego CA First 819 2004
Unitarian
Universalist
Church of
San Diego
Prairie Star Omaha NE First 244 2008 Start of active
Unitarian investigation.
Church of
Omaha
Prairie Star Des Moines IA First 398 2008 Conversation
Unitarian of about a switch
to a "policy
Des Moines board" took
place nearly a
decade ago.
The
appropriate
focus,
however,
began in
August of
2008.
Prairie Star Minneapolis MN First 801 2002
Universalist
Church of
Minneapolis
Prairie Star St. Paul MN Unity 863 1992
Church
Unitarian
Southwest Houston TX First 328 2008 The Board had
Unitarian discussed
doing this a
Universalist few years
Church of back, but did
Houston not really do
anything
substantial
until David
Keyes became
our interim
minister
Southwest Austin TX First 595 2008
Unitarian
Universalist
Church of
Austin
Southwest Dallas TX First 1051 1994 date is
Unitarian approximate
Church of
Dallas
Thom. Jeff. Oak Ridge TN Oak Ridge 235 2003
Unitarian
Universalist
Church
Thom. Jeff. Richmond VA First 541 2005
Unitarian
Universalist
Church of
Richmond
Thom. Jeff. Asheville NC Unitarian 551 2007-08
Universalist
Church of
Asheville
Thom. Jeff. Durham NC Eno River 609
Unitarian
Universalist
Fellowship
Thom. Jeff. Charlotte NC Unitarian 661
Universalist
Church of
Charlotte
Toronto ON First 1994
Unitarian
Congregatio
n of Toronto
buted it June 2010.
Governance® survey.
nance® list.
University Governance track.
en if they weren't completely satisfied with the outcome of their transition.
ce®, we made no judgments in this census about the "right" way to do Policy Governance®. If a
nance® or 'Carver-like' policy-based governance, we included them in the census.
website for the Policy Governance® model can be found at www.carvergovernance.com.
Policy Governance Stage Executive
Transitioning Comments Operating Comments Solo (S) or Comments Y/N
Since Yr. Since Yr. Team (T)
2005 2008 Little T Solo executive Y
movement moved to exec
towards this team. Current
form of Executive
governance Team: (three
until adoption are voluntary):
of an "Ends" 1)Building
policy May, Concerns, 2.
2008 Growth &
Finance, 3.
Worship/Educ
ation/Spiritual
Care (our
minister) and
4. Outreach
and
Communicatio
n.
2004-2005 2005-2006 T Y
2008
2003 2004 T Y
2002 2005 S N
2008 congregational 2009 Date T Still in role N
vote date Management clarification
Team adopted
new board
policies after
board vote.
2005 2006 Now on hold T Y
due to
transition to
new Settled
Senior Minister
and
elimination of
the Executive
Director
position.
2007 2008 Bylaws S Y
amendments
approved at
Annual
congregational
meeting in
June 2008
2002 2002 We have S Y
never fully
made the
transition--
don't do
regular
oversight/moni
toring. The
transition
period ended
but was really
not actually
successful.
2008 board voted to 2009 congregation T
adopt at vote on by-law
retreat, and changes to
set plan to support
accomplish
2007 Congregationa 2008 Leaders T Y
l vote to move presented the
to Policy Ends during
Governance their annual
State of the
Congregation
Address
2008 S
2005 2005 S Senior Minister N
is CEO
2002 2003 Board adopted T We found that Y
relevant by- having a 4-
laws member
Executive
Team (2 staff
and 2
volunteers)
was
cumbersome.
About a year
ago, we
transitioned to
a 2-member
Executive,
both staff, and
it is functioning
much more
effectively.
2001 2002 S We have just Y
moved to solo
executive, who
is supported
by an
Executive
Team
2007 S The
Management
Team, chaired
by and
accountable to
the Senior
Minister, is
composed of
the
Administrator,
the Assistant
Minister, the
Director of
Religious
Education, and
the
Membership
Services
Coordinator.
2008 T
2004 Review and 2005 T Team includes Y
Renewal Parish Minister
Committee (CEO),
studied Associate
governance, Minister,
established an Executive
executive Director
("Coordinating (COO), and
Team") which two Lay
worked with Members.
the board to
implement
policy
governance.
2007 2008 T Y
2005 S
2004 There is no T Y
"officially." The
board adopted
PG about July
2004, which
was a lengthy
transition.
2009 Beginning of 2010 Test initiatives- T Minister, Y
formal process based model Business
to review and with Administrator
revise current congregation; and Board
governance policy Chair to deal
structure. governance with staff
structure will issues and
follow. collaborate on
the board
agenda.
2002 2002 T Y
2003
2005 2005 T Y
2006 Two attempts 2010 Expect to T Co- N
to write adopt full Ministers
policies. policies
January 2010.
executive
Acting as a PG model
Board since
2008.
2009 2009 T We presently N
have a part-
time interim
minister
2006 2007 S Y
2009
2002 2003 T N
2006 2006/2007 T N
2010 we will start we are
after this working on this
year's annual configuration
meeting
2003 2008 T Two teams: 1. N
Operations
Administrative
Team for
Stewardship
(finances and
building) 2.
Program
Administrative
Team
(Worship
Services,
Music and the
Arts, Lifespan
Faith
Development,
Social
Responsibility,
Caring
Community,
UUCommunity
)
2006 2007 T
2000 Transition 2008 Our first full S We are a solo N
conflicts, partly church year of "team"
stemming operating with because co-
from leaders a Mission, ministers
not ends, and a sharing one
understanding Governance job also share
the model, Manual was the executive
kept the Board 08-09. role.
from
undertaking
their work on a
full transition
until 2006.
2006 We are not yet We have not N
and may not structured it
transition to a yet.
very strict
version of
Carver's idea
of Policy
Governance
2005
2005 2007 T Programs and Y
Operations
Council
2008 Not sure We don't have N
an executive
team. There
are Board task
forces, and
Councils that
have decision-
making power.
And I get to
decide a lot of
things.
2004 T
2008 The Board 2009 At its annual T N
worked for a retreat, our
year + to Board had
create a policy Rev. Margaret
goverance Keip help us
document that begin to write
suited the our ends
congregation. statements.
They were
completed in
Oct. 2009 and
we were off!
2009-2010 is
being called
the Learning
Year.
2006-07 Not sure Not sure 2007. Michael T We now call it Not sure
whether Lilliquist Sept. the
2009 This start Administrative
they are date is a bit Team. Our
operating in arbitrary, since administrative
PG we'vbe been team works
headed that well together.
way for a It consists of
while. Dating it the the
from last minister, the
Board retreat, treasurer, the
administrator,
the director of
lifelong
learning and
the leadership
development
coordinator
(so largeish
but it seems to
work)
2010 T Board Y
Executive
committee in
conjunction
with minister
as chief of
staff
2006 T
2003 Board moved 2005 Congregation S currently solo Y (in
towards policy formally executive, but transition
based adopted new up to this year
governance bylaws has been a
now)
but we were team (we are
not in sync in ministerial
with bylaws. transition)
2005 T
not sure 2006-07 T Y
2004 Not sure. 2004 Not sure. T Council of Y
Directors
2004 2005 S N
2006 T Empowerment
Team
2009 2010 Delegation S N
policies are
under way
(Hotchkiss
term) and will
move from
Governance
Working
Group (subset
of board) to
the board in
February
2010.
Not sure no date. T but it took us N
Gradual--still four years to
ongoing. go from Solo
to Team
2005 2009 S N
2008 The Board of 2010 We are S current plan N
Trustees scheduled to
created a begin a trial
Governance run in June
Task Force 2010
and authorized
hiring Dan
Hotchkiss as a
consultant.
2009 This was when 2010 Hope to S While we have N
the board first finalize the an executive
began drafting switch at our team, the
ends 2010 annual responsibility
statements meeting. ultimately rests
(with the help with the
of Laura Park!) minister
2007 The delay 2009 S N
from first
consideration
to formal
transition was
caused largely
by resistance
from the
Senior
Minister. Once
he left
progress on
the transition
began.
1993 Board 1994 Board adopted
approved a by-law
motion to changes, after
adopt Carver having written
model all other
policies
2008 At a start-up Not sure the S Wonder about Y (in
workshop for Board plans this question, transition
my interim any "official" as I would hold
minstry action, but that any way
now)
facilitated by rather a clear other than a
District Board solo executive
Executive indication that does not
Susan Smith, they are constitute
the leadership adopting the policy
expressed Carver mode. governance:
strong interest We are still in David Keyes
in policy transition. We
governance as have several
one way out of parts in place,
the confusion but are not
and conflict finished.
that had
greately
debilitated
them.
2010 It's hard to say We should T Hired an Exec Y (in
when the officially begin Dir. and transition
'formal operating in formed Exec
transition' PG in 2010. Team as they
now)
began. We entered
have hired transition
Unity
Consulting to
assist us with
this transition
during 2010.
1996 Date is 1999 S Y
approximate.
There were
some starts
and stops to
the transition
process. We
hired a
consultant in
the late 1990s
and that is
when it really
took hold.
2005 In 2005, 2009 Only in Fall S "Per policy, the N
consultant Dan 2009 did the minister is
Hotchkiss Board authorized
worked with authorize the with executive
the Board to Executive with authority. But
teach the operational that authority
concepts and oversight of is shared by
by spring finance and an Executive
2006, the personnel and Team,
Board had claim for its composed by
adopted the own role a the minister."
policy policy-setting "The Board
framework. and monitoring delegates to
role. Jake, he then
delegates as
he sees fit.
He has
assembled a
group of paid
and volunteer
leaders (the
executive
team) that
serve as an
advisory team
to him."
2006 2009 S N
2008-09 Started We've been S N
drafting our unofficially
policy trying to
governance operate in the
documents. policy
It's slow going. governance
not there yet. mode. But no
official start as
yet.
2007
2005 not sure of T Y
date
1994 1996 T Our Executive Y
function is
shared
between the
minister, the
chair of the
board (this
gets fuzzy for
policy
governance,
we realize),
and our Chief
Convenor,
who is a lay
person who
effectively
supervises
high-level
unpaid staff.
While this isn't
pure Carver, it
is a shared
ministry hybrid
that has
allowed for
coordination
between lay
and paid staff
and
leadership. It
also, I would
argue,
insulates me
as the
General Data Source Documents
Comments Links
A
A http://www.u
uce.org/polici
es.html
D http://www.unit
ytemple.org/co
mmunity/board
meetings.htm
A http://www.fvu
uf.org/content/
view/25/49/
D
A
Key A http://www.uub
challenges: 1. loomington.org
Role /uucb/govt/boa
Clarification 2. rdPolicies.php
Conflicting
Governance
Strategies
from various
consultants
3.
Communicatio
n regarding
the transition
to a new
governance
model and its
emotional
impact on the
congregation.
Questioning A http://www.buc
their transition. mi.org/frames
Challenges: et.htm. Click
Ministers on Church
needing CEO Business
skills;
monitoring
limitations so
they aren't
exceeded.
See survey A http://www.uua
data for a.org/about-
numerous us/our-
linkage ideas congregation/h
ow-we-govern
Current A
challenges:
establishing
monitoring,
developing the
Board's
visioning role,
and updating
bylaws.
A
Following Dan A http://www.phil
Hotchkiss' auu.org/index.
model. php/policies
Identified
benefit:
Congregation
exercising
trust in the
Minister as
both Executive
Director and
Spiritual
Leader, and
understanding
the
significance of
each roles.
D http://www.uuc
dc.org/policyg
overnance.htm
l
Current A
challenges:
reconciling
minister as
CEO with
minister as
spiritual
leader,
reconciling
Board's
visioning role
with minister's
visioning role,
managing the
pastoral and
managerial
workload of
senior minister
Current A http://www.uuc
challenges: olumbia.net/in
monitoring and dex.php?optio
linkage n=com_conten
t&view=article
&id=70&Itemid
=182
A
D http://www.uuc
a-
md.org/index.p
hp?option=co
m_content&ta
sk=view&id=2
4&Itemid=31
D
Survey data A
includes some
excellent
insights and
advice.
Current A
challenge:
balancing
minister as
CEO with
minister as
spiritual leader
D http://www.all-
souls.org/ click
on the "Policy
Governance"
link
Current A http://uucava.n
challenge: ing.com/page/
educating uuca-
trustees and governance
congregation
about PG roles
A
A
Per minister: D
UUCMC is
operating in a
very modified
PG format. I
would say it is
quite far from
Carver's
model and it
works for this
congregation
so far.
Current A http://www.uup
challenges: rinceton.org/in
developing a dex.php?optio
robust role for n=com_conten
trustees in the t&task=view&i
model, d=57&Itemid=
ministers 53
balancing
administrative
duties with
duties of
congregational
life.
A http://rocheste
runitarian.org/
boardbusiness
.html
A
Challenges: A Policies &
adequate Training
ongoing board Presentations
training; Best http://www.uuc
Practices: a.org/us/gover
organizing nance/board-
agenda into of-
"Ends," trustees/policie
"Linkage & Bd s Monitoring
Governance," Reports
& "Exec http://www.uuc
Limitations"; a.org/us/gover
periodic nance/board-
'practice' of-
scenarios from trustees/monit
Carver oring-reports
handbook.
D
Idea: A Governing
Considering a documents
'council' to and org.
engage lay chart:
members in http://www.first
means. universalist.or
g/pwsite/ourMi
nistries.php?m
inistryID=4037
1&ministryDep
artmentID=791
96
D
A http://www.uun
ashua.org/gov.
shtml
A
A http://www.first-
unitarian-
pgh.org/Gover
nance.html
A
They meet the A http://www.ws
ongoing uuc.org/leader
education s/governance-
challenge with documents.ph
an annual PG p
workshop
that's part of
their
leadership
series.
Current A
challenge:
developing
congregational
comfort with
delegating to
staff
C Governance
documents
and
explanatory
brochure:
http://www.uus
anmateo.org/i
ndex.php/How
_do_things_w
ork.html
Challenge: A
role
clarification &
coordination
among
leadership and
communicatio
n with
congregation
about PBG
A
D
B
Challenges: A
Separating
Roles of Board
and Executive;
how Ends will
guide work of
congregation;
Board-
Congregation
linkage - how
Board will
listen/guide/co
mmunicate
early and often
Challenges: A
Policy-writing;
Role clarity;
Minister
workload; slow
transition due
to lack of plan;
D
Challenges: A
How do we
delegate
without
continued
input to pass
on the
experience/
wisdom/
history? Our
biggest
conceern is
the "letting go"-
how does a
board function
as the
fiduciarily
responsible
entity in
assurring that
what needs to
be done will
get done.
D http://www.eas
tshoreunitarian
.org/About_Us.
htm
B Wealth of
information:
http://www.uuc
hurch.org/our-
church/admini
stration/govern
ance
Best A http://www.first
Practices: A) unitarianportla
Board Officer nd.org/our-
Committee to church/board-
set agenda of-trustees
weeks ahead;
B) Setting
aside at least
1 hour per
meeting for
serious/weight
y issues.
Challenges:
A)
Accountability
structure for
Executive role,
who serve
both as
administrative
leadership and
called
ministers; B)
Board's role in
fundraising
and
responsibility
for ensuring
adequate
financial
resources.
B http://www.em
ersonuuc.org/
about/governa
nce.htm
"Perhaps this A
works in larger
congregations
but it seems
like we're
constantly
fighting to
make the
system work,
which leads
me to believe
that it's the
wrong system
for us."
Challenges: A
Board-
Executive
(Council of
Directors)
roles and
relationship.
Lack of clarity
and/or board
stepping into
management
domain
causing
resentment.
Challenge: A
Confusion on
roles &
responsibilities
D Policies:
http://www.uuc
tucson.org/ind
ex.php/governi
ng-
documents/go
vernance-
policies.html
Describing
PG:
http://www.uuc
tucson.org/ind
ex.php/governi
ng-
documents/pol
icy-
governance.ht
ml
Using A Delegation
Hotchkiss Policy
model. The http://www.pho
"Board only" enixuu.org/?q=
huddle at end node/3845
of board
meetings
going well.
Challenges:
Minister/Staff
authority in
relation to a
few old
committees.
Have tried A Board
both Solo & Policies
Team Exec http://www.vuu
and feel their .org/boardoftru
Team stees
executive role Org. Chart
works well for http://www.vuu
their midsize .org/churchorg
church. anization
Challenge:
getting
congregation
to understand
the system.
Challenges: A Governance
New board &
member Accountabilit
orientation & y Document:
training http://www.first
uusandiego.or
g/governance
A http://www.first
uuomaha.org/f
iles/GTF.htm
http://www.first
uuomaha.org/f
iles/board_of_t
rustees.html
http://www.first
uuomaha.org/f
iles/Soul-
Full/SFTSched
ule.html
A
Current A http://www.first
challenge: univ.org/about-
defining a us/governing-
robust Board documents
role.
A
Challenges: A http://www.first
Board/Leader uu.org/govern
education - ance.php
steep learning
curve; not
watering PG
down so much
that it's
ineffective;
Anxiety about
accountability,
power, control.
Transition
Best
Practices:
Professional
consultant
help; Hearing
from
congregations
that have
successfully
made
transition;
Minister
encouraging
the board in
this work and
not doing it for
them.
A
Challenges: A http://www.dall
CEO asuu.org/pdfs/
monitoring; policies.pdf
Rewriting
mission &
ends after 10
years. Best
Practices:
Training new
board
members;
Executive
functioning;
Consistent &
continuous
use of a
consultant to
help with
board training
and executive
coaching
Challenges: A Governance
Role of the and
executive; Operational
Financial Policies:
authority; the http://www.oru
discipline & uc.org/staticpa
patience to ges/index.php
work into the ?page=20091
model 002210637655
Challenges: A
Varying
definitions of
compliance
Common A
transition
challenges of
simultaneous
old and new
systems, role
clarity &
authority,
bringing
congregation
along with
changes.
D
Challenges: A About the
Board's focus UUCC Policy
in new role; Governance
measuring & http://www.uuc
monitoring charlotte.org/a
progress; bout_policy_g
orienting new overnance.asp
board ; Strategic
members. Outcomes by
Ends
Statement
(12/07)
http://www.uuc
charlotte.org/d
ocuments/PDF
15AUStrategic
Outcomes.pdf
A http://firstunitar
iantoronto.org/
congDocs.htm
Related docs
