Excel

Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund - Guaranteed Loans Agricultural Credit Insurance Fund Direct Loans Agricultural Crops Counter Cyclical Payments Agricultural Export Credit Guarantee Programs Agricultural Marketing Loan Payments Agriculture Marketing Service - Research and Promotion Programs Animal Welfare Cochran Fellowship Program Commodity Purchase Services (Section 32) Commodity Supplemental Food Program Community Facilities Program Conservation Operations Conservation Reserve Program Conservation Security Program Dairy Payment Program Dairy Price Support Program Direct Crop Payments Economic Research Service Emergency Conservation Program Emergency Pest and Disease Management Programs Emergency Watershed Protection Program Environmental Quality Incentives Program Export Enhancement/Dairy Export Incentive Program Farmland Protection Program Federal Crop Insurance Federal Grain Inspection Services Food and Nutrition Service - Child and Adult Care Food Program Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations Food Safety and Inspection Service Food Stamp Nutrition Education Food Stamp Program Forest Service: Energy Resource Needs Forest Service: Forest Legacy Program Forest Service: Invasive Species Program Forest Service: Land Acquisition Forest Service: Recreation Forest Service: Watershed Grants for Economic Opportunities and Quality of Life for Rural America Grants for Nutrition and Health In-House Research for Natural Resource Base and Environment In-House Research for Nutrition and Health Intermediary Relending Program Market News and Marketing Services Multi-Family Housing Programs Mutual Self-Help Housing -- Technical Assistance Grants National Agricultural Statistics Service National Forest Improvement and Maintenance National School Lunch Natural Resource Base & Environment (Grants) Non-Insured Crop Assistance Program Nutrition Assistance for Puerto Rico On-going Pest and Disease Management Program Packers and Stockyards Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act Pest and Disease Exclusion Pesticide Data Program Plant and Animal Health Monitoring Programs Protection and Safety of Agricultural Food Supply (Grants) Research on Protection and Safety of Agricultural Food Supply Research/Extension Grants: Economic Opportunities for Producers Resource Conservation and Development Rural Business and Industry Guaranteed Loan Program Rural Business Enterprise Grant Program Rural Business-Cooperative Service Value-Added Producer Grants Rural Development Broadband Loan and Loan Guarantee Program Rural Distance Learning and Telemedicine Loan and Grant Program Rural Electric Utility Loans and Guarantees Rural Telecommunications Loan Programs Rural Water and Wastewater Grants and Loans School Breakfast Program Senior and Woman, Infants, and Children Farmers' Market Programs Single Family Housing Direct Loans Single Family Housing Loan Guarantees Summer Food Service Program The Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAP) Trade Adjustment Assistance for Farmers USDA Food Aid Programs USDA Foreign Market Development Programs Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2008 80% 50% 100% 60% 2004 100% 75% 89% 53% 2004 80% 86% 71% 60% 2004 80% 63% 100% 67% 2007 60% 75% 57% 47% 2006 80% 63% 100% 33% 2007 100% 78% 100% 45% 2008 100% 75% 100% 40% 2006 40% 0% 43% 13% 2004 40% 0% 67% 7% 2006 80% 75% 100% 73% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2005 100% 63% 57% 67% 2008 40% 50% 57% 13% 2006 60% 100% 71% 53% 2006 40% 50% 57% 7% 2008 40% 75% 86% 53% 2005 100% 100% 100% 73% 2006 60% 25% 43% 33% 2005 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 80% 88% 100% 27% 2007 80% 88% 86% 60% 2006 40% 88% 86% 73% 2005 80% 100% 90% 47% 2005 80% 88% 84% 75% 2005 60% 100% 72% 67% 2006 100% 75% 67% 40% 2006 80% 63% 78% 27% 2008 80% 78% 90% 44% 2007 100% 50% 72% 27% 2003 80% 63% 100% 67% 2005 100% 75% 72% 40% 2004 80% 75% 80% 73% 2006 100% 70% 73% 40% 2005 80% 63% 86% 27% 2005 80% 70% 75% 73% 2006 80% 50% 55% 47% 2006 80% 100% 92% 84% 2006 100% 100% 100% 75% 2006 80% 90% 100% 67% 2006 100% 90% 100% 67% 2004 80% 63% 100% 40% 2006 80% 63% 86% 25% 2005 60% 88% 89% 67% 2004 80% 88% 90% 75% 2004 100% 88% 100% 60% 2007 60% 22% 63% 39% 2006 100% 100% 89% 67% 2005 100% 90% 100% 47% 2006 100% 75% 86% 67% 2005 100% 50% 44% 40% 2006 100% 100% 100% 74% 2006 60% 11% 60% 6% 2004 100% 88% 100% 46% 2004 100% 100% 100% 72% 2007 80% 50% 100% 50% 2008 100% 88% 90% 40% 2005 100% 90% 100% 60% 2005 100% 90% 100% 67% 2004 80% 100% 100% 58% 2006 80% 88% 100% 33% 2008 80% 75% 89% 33% 2007 80% 75% 100% 26% 2006 80% 75% 90% 40% 2007 80% 75% 89% 33% 2007 100% 75% 75% 20% 2004 60% 75% 88% 59% 2004 60% 75% 100% 46% 2005 80% 100% 100% 87% 2004 80% 88% 44% 73% 2006 60% 0% 78% 0% 2004 100% 57% 89% 67% 2007 80% 88% 100% 80% 2006 100% 88% 100% 46% 2005 100% 0% 44% 7% 2006 60% 50% 71% 20% 2004 80% 75% 83% 60% 2005 40% 88% 90% 80% Rating Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 2412 92 3159 3374 4981 3 21 3 1078 140 27 862 1865 379 23 0 5224 79 18 380 260 1200 0 97 6497 59 2245 88 930 312 37710 104 52 130 42 281 797 204 159 251 97 48 52 576 38 180 475 8098 216 105 1623 79 20 7 371 15 318 241 437 458 52 53 44 20 33 37 48 4 745 2393 41 105 61 312 240 0 129 251 2412 1099 521 4342 7311 3 21 1 1048 163 27 848 2012 301 2 0 5060 78 0 315 300 1337 0 121 8664 59 2487 115 930 327 51812 106 52 132 42 287 812 212 161 247 95 48 53 1095 38 182 456 8517 210 325 1760 74 21 7 384 15 330 243 426 447 51 43 39 36 19 35 20 2 540 2612 41 105 61 361 300 0 185 254 CR CR DF CR DF DF RG CO DF BF CR DF DF DF DF DF DF RD DF RG DF DF DF CO DF DF BF BF RG BF BF DF CO DF DF DF DF RD RD RD RD CR DF CR CO DF CA BF RD DF BF RG RG DF RG DF RG RD RD RD DF CR CO CO CR CR CR CR CR BF BF CR CR BF BF DF CO CO RD CO RG RD RD RD CO BF CO CO BF CO CO CO CO CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture Agriculture USDA Research: Economic Opportunities for Producers USDA Wildland Fire Management Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Wetlands Reserve Program Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) Agricultural Commodity Grading and Certification Programs Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2004 80% 90% 100% 58% 2006 100% 50% 29% 40% 2004 80% 86% 100% 40% 2005 80% 100% 100% 40% 2006 80% 88% 100% 47% 2006 100% 100% 100% 74% 2004 80% 88% 100% 40% Rating Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 440 2054 70 184 85 6020 241 435 2238 50 570 85 6658 204 RD DF DF DF DF BF DF Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce Advanced Technology Program Bureau of Economic Analysis Bureau of Industry and Security Census Bureau: Current Demographic Statistics Census Bureau: Current Economic Statistics and Census of Governments Census Bureau: Decennial Census Census Bureau: Economic Census Census Bureau: Intercensal Demographic Estimates Census Bureau: Survey Sample Redesign Coastal Zone Management Act Programs Commerce Small Business Innovation Research Program Economic Development Administration Hydrology International Trade Administration: Import Administration International Trade Administration: Manufacturing and Services International Trade Administration: Market Access and Compliance International Trade Administration: U.S. and Foreign Commercial Service Manufacturing Extension Partnership Minority Business Development Agency National Institute of Standards and Technology Laboratories National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Tsunami Monitoring, Forecasting, and Warning Program National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Climate Program National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Ecosystem Research National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Marine and Aviation Operations National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Navigation Services National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Protected Areas National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration: Weather and Related Programs National Telecommunications and Information Adminstration Pacific Coastal Salmon Recovery Fund U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Patents U.S. Patent and Trademark Office - Trademarks United State Patent and Trademark Office - Intellectual Property Protection Activities Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2002 20% 86% 100% 67% 2003 100% 88% 100% 87% 2005 100% 100% 73% 56% 2004 100% 100% 100% 74% 2005 80% 100% 100% 74% 2007 100% 100% 100% 67% 2004 100% 100% 100% 80% 2003 80% 88% 100% 74% 2003 100% 88% 100% 74% 2003 100% 25% 67% 20% 2003 40% 12% 90% 0% 2004 80% 100% 90% 67% 2007 100% 88% 100% 50% 2007 80% 67% 90% 22% 2006 80% 75% 100% 46% 2007 100% 88% 100% 47% 2008 80% 88% 100% 47% 2002 40% 86% 91% 80% 2007 80% 75% 100% 33% 2003 100% 100% 86% 75% 2007 100% 89% 90% 50% 2008 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 80% 90% 82% 74% 2005 60% 100% 91% 46% 2006 100% 89% 88% 50% 2006 100% 100% 86% 73% 2004 100% 89% 100% 39% 2005 100% 100% 75% 61% 2005 80% 100% 57% 50% 2006 80% 75% 100% 67% 2008 100% 100% 100% 47% 2003 100% 86% 86% 53% 2008 100% 100% 100% 33% Rating Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 0 82 75 77 161 1004 128 10 11 101 8 249 42 59 47 41 224 90 30 601 496 33 230 198 182 141 42 1846 18 67 1642 221 53 0 81 73 67 161 2689 115 10 11 101 8 249 44 62 40 41 235 90 29 601 430 29 240 175 199 141 51 2071 17 35 1784 237 55 CO DF RG DF DF DF DF DF DF BF CO CO DF RG DF DF DF CO CO RD RG DF RD RD DF DF RG CA DF BF DF DF DF CO CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Defense--Military Air Combat Program Air Force Aircraft and Weapons Readiness Air Force Base Operations & Support Air Force Combat-Related Readiness Air Force Depot Maintenance Airlift Program Army Air Readiness Army Base Operations & Support Army Depot Maintenance Army Land Forces Readiness Chemical Demilitarization Cooperative Threat Reduction Defense Advanced Technology Development Program Defense Air Transportation System Defense Applied Research Program Defense Basic Research Defense Civilian Education and Training Defense Commissary Agency Defense Communications Infrastructure Defense Contract Audit Agency Defense Contract Management Agency Defense Health Care Defense Housing Defense Small Business Innovation Research/Technology Transfer Department of Defense Depot Maintenance: Ship Department of Defense Education Activity Department of Defense Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, Modernization, and Demolition Department of Defense Recruiting Department of Defense Training and Education Programs - Accession Training Department of Defense Training and Education Programs - Basic Skills and Advanced Training Department of Defense Training and Education Programs -- Voluntary Training Depot Maintenance - Naval Aviation DoD Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Energy Conservation Investment Future Combat Systems/Modularity Land Warfare Junior Reserve Officer Training Corps Marine Corps Base Operations & Support Marine Corps Depot Maintenance Marine Corps Expeditionary Warfare Marine Corps Ground Forces Readiness Military Construction Programs Military Force Management Missile Defense National Security Space Weather Programs Navy Base Operations & Support Navy Ship Readiness Navy Shipbuilding Navy/Marine Corps Air Readiness Precision Weapons Programs Rotary Wing Programs Space Launch Space-based Communications Programs Strategic Offensive Capabilities Test & Evaluation Programs Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2002 100% 100% 72% 67% 2004 100% 100% 71% 92% 2006 80% 50% 86% 26% 2007 100% 100% 86% 80% 2004 100% 100% 86% 93% 2002 100% 100% 83% 84% 2006 100% 100% 72% 75% 2006 100% 88% 86% 53% 2006 100% 100% 86% 80% 2004 100% 100% 71% 92% 2005 80% 88% 67% 42% 2006 100% 100% 100% 84% 2007 100% 70% 75% 0% 2005 100% 88% 86% 50% 2004 100% 67% 50% 67% 2002 100% 89% 85% 80% 2006 100% 88% 100% 40% 2006 80% 88% 100% 67% 2002 80% 78% 36% 44% 2007 100% 100% 100% 74% 2007 100% 100% 100% 74% 2003 100% 80% 65% 40% 2002 100% 100% 72% 67% 2003 60% 0% 43% 6% 2004 100% 100% 86% 84% 2005 40% 100% 72% 80% 2002 80% 100% 14% 60% 2002 80% 100% 72% 75% 2005 100% 100% 86% 67% 2005 100% 100% 86% 75% 2006 100% 75% 71% 75% 2004 100% 100% 86% 80% 2005 80% 100% 72% 60% 2003 100% 78% 73% 95% 2005 100% 100% 63% 56% 2006 80% 88% 100% 75% 2006 80% 50% 72% 26% 2006 100% 100% 86% 87% 2006 80% 89% 88% 56% 2006 100% 100% 86% 80% 2006 100% 100% 88% 67% 2003 100% 100% 72% 93% 2005 80% 78% 86% 56% 2005 80% 78% 63% 61% 2006 80% 88% 57% 60% 2004 100% 100% 83% 84% 2002 80% 90% 73% 47% 2004 100% 100% 71% 92% 2006 100% 100% 87% 73% 2006 80% 78% 75% 28% 2005 80% 89% 75% 56% 2006 80% 89% 88% 61% 2006 100% 100% 86% 75% 2006 100% 25% 58% 25% Rating Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 18000 16928 7577 3824 3943 3596 1702 8149 1237 40077 1513 371 5878 5049 4855 1599 355 1522 6620 410 1047 24096 2413 1284 5772 2053 7905 7532 877 4971 608 1465 2303 70 15501 324 2316 498 12008 4551 17737 125415 8552 719 5196 13220 13564 6689 580 11593 1987 7655 3041 3060 18588 16984 7157 3518 4285 5077 1928 8809 1213 15538 1486 426 5413 3985 5090 1822 404 1588 7102 422 1068 24044 3196 0 5374 1704 8180 5420 1037 5626 603 1436 3213 90 12776 353 2474 98 7941 1566 20853 114722 9158 718 5374 11529 15771 6519 694 13173 1982 8580 3089 3147 CA DF DF DF DF CA DF DF DF DF DF CA RD DF RD RD DF DF CA DF DF DF DF RD DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF CA CA DF DF DF CA DF CA DF CA CA DF DF CA DF CA CA CA CA DF DF CO CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education 21st Century Community Learning Centers Adult Education State Grants Advanced Placement American Indian Vocational Rehabilitation Services American Printing House for the Blind Assistive Technology Alternative Financing Program B.J. Stupak Olympic scholarships Byrd Honors Scholarships Charter Schools Grant Child Care Access Means Parents in School College Assistance Migrant Program Comprehensive Regional Assistance Centers Comprehensive School Reform Developing Hispanic-serving Institutions Early Reading First Education - Neglected and Delinquent State Agency Program Education - State Assessment Grants Education for Homeless Children and Youths Education State Grants for Innovative Programs English Language Acquisition State Grants Enhancing Education Through Technology Even Start Federal Family Education Loans Federal Pell Grants Federal Perkins Loans Federal Support for Gallaudet University Federal Support for Howard University Federal Support for the National Technical Institute for the Deaf Federal Work-Study Gaining Early Awareness and Readiness for Undergraduate Programs Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need High School Equivalency Program Historically Black College and University Capital Financing IDEA Special Education - Parent Information Centers IDEA Special Education - Research and Innovation IDEA Special Education - Technical Assistance and Dissemination IDEA Special Education Grants for Infants and Families IDEA Special Education Grants to States IDEA Special Education Personnel Preparation Grants IDEA Special Education Preschool Grants IDEA Technology and Media Services Impact Aid Basic Support Payments and Payments for Children with Disabilities Impact Aid Construction Impact Aid Payments for Federal Property Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Independent Living for People with Disabilities Indian Education Grants to Local Educational Agencies Institute of Education Sciences Research International Education Domestic Programs Javits Fellowships Leveraging Educational Assistance Partnership Magnet Schools Mathematics and Science Partnerships Mentoring Program Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Migrant State Agency Program National Assessment for Educational Progress National Center for Education Statistics National Institute for Literacy National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research National Writing Project Parental Information and Resource Centers Physical Education Program Projects with Industry for People with Disabilities Reading First State Grants Ready to Learn Television Rural Education Safe and Drug Free Schools State Grants Smaller Learning Communities Strengthening Historically Black Colleges and Universities Strengthening Historically Black Graduate Institutions Strengthening Institutions Student Aid Administration Supplemental Educational Opportunity Grants Supported Employment State Grants Teacher Quality Enhancement Teaching American History Tech-Prep Education State Grants Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2003 100% 75% 89% 13% 2006 100% 88% 100% 80% 2005 100% 88% 100% 42% 2004 80% 75% 50% 53% 2005 60% 13% 67% 0% 2004 100% 0% 40% 0% 2004 40% 50% 50% 0% 2004 40% 63% 44% 0% 2005 100% 88% 80% 47% 2007 80% 75% 90% 25% 2004 100% 50% 60% 0% 2004 80% 25% 60% 0% 2002 80% 84% 63% 33% 2005 100% 88% 80% 17% 2006 100% 88% 100% 59% 2007 100% 75% 100% 33% 2004 90% 86% 78% 17% 2006 100% 75% 89% 34% 2005 20% 0% 56% 0% 2006 100% 63% 78% 0% 2005 80% 63% 100% 17% 2002 60% 43% 63% 0% 2004 60% 88% 44% 53% 2003 100% 88% 67% 53% 2003 20% 50% 33% 0% 2006 60% 75% 100% 25% 2005 60% 88% 67% 60% 2005 60% 75% 56% 40% 2003 80% 63% 56% 20% 2003 100% 84% 88% 13% 2006 100% 88% 100% 25% 2004 100% 25% 60% 0% 2007 80% 50% 89% 40% 2004 100% 25% 60% 0% 2003 100% 40% 60% 8% 2004 100% 25% 60% 0% 2002 100% 29% 44% 0% 2008 100% 88% 100% 42% 2003 100% 0% 60% 0% 2002 40% 0% 56% 0% 2006 100% 38% 60% 0% 2008 60% 88% 100% 33% 2005 100% 88% 100% 17% 2004 60% 0% 50% 0% 2005 100% 100% 100% 50% 2003 100% 13% 40% 8% 2007 100% 75% 100% 25% 2007 100% 80% 100% 73% 2007 100% 50% 80% 17% 2004 100% 88% 70% 25% 2004 20% 13% 78% 20% 2004 100% 63% 70% 20% 2006 100% 38% 78% 0% 2006 80% 88% 70% 0% 2006 80% 50% 40% 13% 2006 100% 75% 78% 33% 2003 100% 100% 70% 100% 2003 100% 89% 60% 100% 2008 60% 63% 70% 17% 2005 100% 90% 90% 42% 2004 80% 13% 50% 0% 2004 40% 38% 60% 0% 2005 80% 50% 90% 8% 2004 60% 75% 50% 40% 2006 100% 88% 100% 75% 2004 100% 50% 70% 8% 2006 80% 88% 89% 25% 2006 60% 63% 78% 8% 2008 80% 88% 90% 17% 2005 100% 88% 78% 17% 2005 100% 88% 78% 17% 2006 100% 88% 80% 17% 2008 100% 78% 88% 45% 2003 60% 63% 56% 20% 2007 80% 50% 89% 20% 2008 60% 88% 100% 33% 2004 100% 50% 70% 0% 2002 60% 43% 56% 0% Rating Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Ineffective Adequate Adequate Ineffective Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 981 564 37 34 18 4 1 41 215 16 15 56 2 193 118 50 400 62 99 669 272 82 3457 16256 64 107 237 56 980 303 30 19 305 26 72 49 436 10783 90 381 38 1141 18 64 2887 130 95 163 94 10 64 107 182 49 2 387 93 90 7 107 22 40 73 17 1029 24 169 347 94 323 57 78 696 757 30 60 120 105 1081 554 44 35 22 4 1 40 211 16 15 57 2 205 113 49 400 64 0 700 267 66 951 18851 64 113 233 60 980 303 30 18 0 27 71 48 436 9515 88 374 39 1154 18 64 2935 128 97 160 94 10 64 105 179 49 2 380 104 88 6 106 24 39 76 19 393 24 172 295 80 323 57 78 753 757 29 34 118 103 BF BF CO CO BF CO CO BF CO CO CO CO BF CO CO BF BF BF BF BF BF BF CR BF CR BF BF BF BF CO CO CO CR CO RD CO BF DF CO BF CO BF CO BF DF CO BF RD CO CO BF CO BF CO CO BF RD RD CO RD CO CO CO CO BF CO BF BF CO BF BF CO CA BF BF CO CO BF CO CO CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Education Title I Grants to Local Educational Agencies Training and Advisory Services Transition to Teaching Tribally Controlled Postsecondary Vocational and Technical Institutions TRIO Educational Opportunity Centers TRIO McNair Postbaccalaureate Achievement TRIO Student Support Services TRIO Talent Search TRIO Upward Bound Troops-to-Teachers Vocational Education State Grants Vocational Rehabilitation Demonstration and Training Programs Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants Vocational Rehabilitation Training William D. Ford Direct Student Loans Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 100% 88% 100% 50% 2008 100% 75% 90% 25% 2008 100% 88% 100% 74% 2002 100% 0% 30% 0% 2007 100% 75% 80% 13% 2006 100% 88% 80% 59% 2005 100% 88% 90% 59% 2005 100% 88% 90% 50% 2002 80% 72% 55% 17% 2003 100% 50% 60% 27% 2002 20% 43% 56% 0% 2005 100% 38% 50% 0% 2002 100% 57% 44% 42% 2006 100% 88% 80% 33% 2004 60% 88% 44% 53% Rating Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Adequate Ineffective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 12838 7 44 7 50 42 273 143 314 15 1182 7 2803 38 5277 13899 7 44 8 47 44 281 143 361 14 1161 10 2839 38 1654 BF CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO CO BF CO BF CO CR Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Energy Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative Advanced Scientific Computing Research Basic Energy Sciences Biological and Environmental Research Biomass and Biorefinery Systems Bonneville Power Administration Building Technologies Civilian Radioactive Waste Management Program: Yucca Mountain Project Coal Energy Technology Distributed Energy Resources Electric System Research and Development Environmental and Administration Energy Information Post-Retirement Liabilities Environmental Management Federal Energy Management Program Fusion Energy Sciences Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Initiative Geothermal Technology High Energy Physics Hydrogen Technology Industrial Technologies Program National Nuclear Infrastructure National Nuclear Security Administration: Elimination of Weapons-Grade Plutonium Production Program National Nuclear Security Administration: Facilities and Infrastructure Recapitalization Program National Nuclear Security Administration: International Nuclear Materials Protection and Cooperation National Nuclear Security Administration: Nonproliferation and International Security National Nuclear Security Administration: Safeguards and Security National Nuclear Security Administration: Advanced Simulation and Computing (ASC) National Nuclear Security Administration: Directed Stockpile Work (DSW) National Nuclear Security Administration: Engineering Campaign National Nuclear Security Administration: Fissile Materials Disposition Program National Nuclear Security Administration: Global Threat Reduction Initiative Program National Nuclear Security Administration: Inertial Confinement Fusion Ignition and High Yield Campaign (ICF) National Nuclear Security Administration: Naval Reactors National Nuclear Security Administration: Nonproliferation and Verification Research and Development National Nuclear Security Administration: Nuclear Weapons Incident Response Program National Nuclear Security Administration: Pit Manufacturing and Certification Campaign National Nuclear Security Administration: Readiness Campaign National Nuclear Security Administration: Readiness in Technical Base and Facilities National Nuclear Security Administration: Science Campaign National Nuclear Security Administration: Secure Transportation Asset (STA) Natural Gas Technology Nuclear Physics Nuclear Power 2010 Oil Technology Solar Energy Southeastern Power Administration Southwestern Power Administration State Energy Programs Strategic Petroleum Reserve University Nuclear Education Programs Vehicle Technologies Weatherization Assistance Western Area Power Administration Wind Energy Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2003 100% 90% 100% 53% 2003 100% 70% 66% 87% 2003 100% 80% 91% 93% 2003 100% 89% 66% 87% 2005 80% 90% 73% 42% 2002 60% 89% 100% 73% 2003 80% 50% 88% 42% 2007 85% 80% 70% 33% 2005 80% 70% 75% 33% 2003 80% 80% 100% 59% 2006 80% 80% 82% 74% 2004 100% 55% 100% 47% 2007 100% 88% 100% 67% 2003 100% 80% 96% 24% 2005 100% 100% 86% 50% 2003 100% 90% 66% 80% 2003 100% 90% 100% 60% 2003 80% 80% 88% 59% 2003 100% 70% 66% 87% 2007 80% 80% 81% 59% 2005 80% 90% 91% 50% 2004 100% 89% 100% 0% 2005 80% 100% 100% 84% 2008 100% 100% 100% 67% 2007 100% 100% 100% 74% 2008 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 60% 88% 100% 73% 2007 100% 100% 100% 73% 2008 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 100% 100% 88% 73% 2006 100% 100% 88% 50% 2006 100% 100% 100% 74% 2008 100% 100% 100% 80% 2005 100% 100% 100% 92% 2005 100% 90% 88% 60% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 100% 100% 100% 84% 2005 100% 100% 89% 78% 2007 100% 100% 100% 67% 2005 100% 91% 83% 72% 2004 100% 100% 86% 67% 2003 40% 60% 88% 25% 2003 100% 80% 66% 87% 2008 100% 70% 100% 53% 2003 60% 60% 88% 25% 2003 80% 80% 100% 59% 2002 60% 72% 86% 73% 2002 60% 78% 91% 72% 2004 100% 25% 89% 17% 2003 100% 88% 100% 87% 2005 60% 25% 70% 0% 2004 80% 90% 100% 75% 2003 100% 88% 78% 75% 2002 60% 78% 91% 78% 2003 80% 80% 88% 67% Rating Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 166 342 1253 531 196 2758 103 386 448 61 110 95 189 6215 19 295 35 5 703 189 56 100 180 178 624 150 966 575 1406 169 66 199 470 816 387 159 214 158 1635 286 212 20 424 80 5 157 69 52 49 187 17 184 205 1449 49 179 351 1287 544 198 3607 109 386 687 56 122 116 186 6153 20 315 115 0 689 211 64 116 141 170 430 140 983 562 1676 143 42 220 421 839 275 222 0 183 1721 323 221 23 434 134 4 168 71 99 44 189 0 213 227 1694 50 RD RD RD RD RD CA RD CA RD RD RD DF DF CA DF RD RD RD RD RD RD CA CA CA DF DF DF RD CA RD CA DF CA RD RD DF RD RD CA RD DF RD RD RD RD RD DF CA BF DF CO RD BF CA RD CO CO CO CO CA CA CA CO CO CA CO CO CO CA RD RD CA CA CO CO CO CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Abstinence Education Access to Recovery Administration on Aging Adolescent Family Life Program Adoption Assistance Adoption Incentives Adoption Opportunities Afghanistan Health Initiative Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Assets for Independence Bioterrorism: Biosurveillance Bioterrorism: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Intramural Activities Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities Black Lung Clinics CDC: Buildings and Facilities CDC: Division of Global Migration and Quarantine CDC: Environmental Health CDC: Global Immunizations CDC: Infectious Diseases CDC: Occupational Safety and Health CDC: State and Local Preparedness Grants Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Grants Child Care and Development Fund Child Welfare Services Childhood Immunization Program Children's Hospitals Graduate Medical Education Payment Program Childrens Mental Health Services Chronic Disease Prevention Commissioned Corps:Readiness and Response Program Community Mental Health Services Block Grant Community Services Block Grant Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Compassion Capital Fund Developmental Disabilities Grant Programs Emergency Medical Services for Children Family Planning Family Violence Prevention and Services Program Food and Drug Administration Foster Care Free Clinics Medical Malpractice Coverage Hansen's Disease Services Programs Head Start Health - Data Collection and Dissemination Health and Human Services - Office for Civil Rights Health Care Facilities Construction and Other Miscellaneous Congressional Earmarks Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Health Care Patient Safety Health Centers Health Information Technology Research (AHRQ) Health Professions Healthy Community Access Program Healthy Start HIV/AIDS Research Human Trafficking Independent Living Program Indian Health Service Federally-Administered Activities Indian Health Service Health Care Facilities Construction Indian Health Service Resource and Patient Management System Indian Health Service Sanitation Facilities Construction Program Injury Prevention and Control Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program Maternal and Child Health Block Grant Medicaid Medicare Medicare Integrity Program Mental Health Programs of Regional and National Significance Mentoring Children of Prisoners Minority HIV/AIDS Initiative National Bioterrorism Hospital Preparedness Program National Bone Marrow Donor Registry National Center for Health Statistics National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis Prevention National Health Service Corps National Institutes of Health - Buildings and Facilities National Institutes of Health - Extramural Research Programs National Institutes of Health - Intramural Research National Institutes of Health: Extramural Research Facilities Construction National Institutes of Health: Research Training Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 100% 63% 58% 33% 2007 100% 88% 70% 67% 2007 100% 75% 100% 75% 2008 80% 88% 80% 33% 2005 100% 50% 89% 60% 2005 100% 63% 78% 17% 2005 100% 63% 80% 17% 2007 100% 88% 80% 27% 2007 100% 88% 100% 75% 2004 100% 57% 100% 33% 2006 100% 63% 100% 25% 2006 100% 50% 100% 25% 2006 100% 88% 100% 42% 2006 80% 63% 60% 25% 2004 100% 78% 88% 33% 2008 100% 100% 100% 84% 2005 100% 88% 90% 42% 2005 100% 88% 100% 73% 2004 100% 75% 70% 50% 2004 100% 89% 91% 33% 2003 80% 63% 56% 26% 2004 100% 75% 100% 0% 2004 100% 88% 78% 73% 2006 100% 88% 100% 50% 2003 100% 84% 70% 42% 2003 40% 75% 67% 50% 2002 80% 86% 82% 58% 2006 100% 88% 100% 67% 2006 80% 75% 100% 26% 2003 100% 88% 89% 25% 2003 80% 13% 89% 0% 2004 100% 38% 100% 11% 2006 100% 50% 80% 7% 2003 100% 75% 100% 25% 2004 80% 13% 80% 17% 2005 100% 50% 100% 53% 2004 100% 13% 89% 7% 2003 100% 100% 100% 54% 2007 80% 88% 100% 67% 2006 100% 63% 86% 13% 2006 100% 78% 86% 50% 2006 80% 100% 90% 80% 2002 84% 89% 80% 67% 2005 100% 67% 100% 56% 2005 0% 0% 50% 0% 2002 100% 14% 84% 25% 2003 100% 90% 100% 22% 2007 100% 88% 90% 87% 2008 100% 30% 70% 7% 2002 60% 72% 73% 13% 2005 20% 63% 70% 20% 2006 100% 86% 90% 60% 2003 100% 78% 88% 75% 2005 100% 88% 100% 46% 2004 100% 13% 89% 0% 2002 100% 72% 57% 74% 2004 100% 100% 100% 84% 2003 80% 78% 100% 89% 2007 100% 89% 75% 78% 2006 100% 88% 100% 67% 2003 80% 25% 78% 8% 2008 100% 86% 100% 84% 2006 80% 86% 56% 33% 2003 80% 100% 72% 67% 2002 100% 72% 88% 80% 2005 80% 63% 60% 17% 2005 100% 100% 100% 20% 2007 80% 50% 90% 7% 2003 80% 63% 56% 22% 2004 80% 75% 90% 67% 2005 100% 90% 100% 67% 2007 100% 88% 100% 75% 2002 100% 100% 82% 47% 2005 100% 89% 88% 100% 2004 100% 78% 75% 92% 2005 100% 90% 88% 87% 2006 80% 100% 90% 80% 2006 100% 90% 90% 80% Rating Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Ineffective Adequate Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Ineffective Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 163 98 1414 30 2156 4 26 6 74 24 53 121 127 6 55 36 154 140 222 382 746 27 4979 282 527 297 104 834 17 428 654 42 53 163 20 283 125 2475 4581 0 18 6878 65 34 0 166 34 1943 50 302 0 102 2906 10 140 2052 26 55 94 135 2570 693 190624 439786 744 263 49 52 474 25 114 1002 126 89 21811 2870 14 1360 163 96 1432 30 2286 4 26 6 74 24 53 121 127 6 55 38 154 140 218 382 746 27 4979 282 527 302 102 834 16 428 654 42 53 163 19 300 125 2473 4453 0 18 6878 63 34 304 170 34 2022 45 318 0 100 2913 10 140 2087 37 69 94 135 5100 666 204860 461171 756 299 49 51 423 24 114 1002 123 127 22044 2911 0 1384 BF CO BF CO BF BF CO CO CO CO DF DF CO CO CA DF CO CO CO RD BF BF BF BF CO BF CO CO DF BF BF BF CO BF CO CO BF RG BF DF RD CO RD RG CO DF RD CO RD CO CO CO RD CO BF DF CA CA CA CO BF BF BF DF BF CO CO CO BF CO RD CO CO CA RD RD CO CO CO CO CO CO RD RD Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services Health and Human Services National Practitioner and Health Care Integrity/Protection Data Banks Nursing Education Loan Repayment and Scholarship Program Office of Child Support Enforcement Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals Office of Minority Health Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology Office on Women's Health Organ Transplantation Pharmaceutical Outcomes Poison Control Centers Projects for Assistance in Transition from Homelessness Promoting Safe and Stable Families Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Radiation and Exposure Screening and Education Program Refugee Social Services Refugee Transitional and Medical Services Runaway and Homeless Youth Rural Health Activities Ryan White HIV/AIDS Shelter and Care for Unaccompanied Alien Children Social Services Block Grant State Children's Health Insurance Program State Planning Grant Program Strategic National Stockpile Substance Abuse Drug Courts Substance Abuse Prevention and Treatment Block Grant Substance Abuse Prevention Programs of Regional and National Significance Substance Abuse Treatment Programs of Regional and National Significance Telehealth Network Grant Program Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) Trauma-EMS Systems Program Traumatic Brain Injury Tribally-Operated Health Programs United States-Mexico Border Health Commission Universal Newborn Hearing Screening and Intervention Program Urban Indian Health Program Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 80% 86% 86% 84% 2002 90% 72% 82% 17% 2003 100% 100% 100% 80% 2005 60% 63% 100% 33% 2008 100% 88% 100% 47% 2005 80% 25% 80% 20% 2006 100% 63% 86% 8% 2004 80% 13% 80% 7% 2004 100% 75% 90% 33% 2004 80% 70% 102% 67% 2004 80% 75% 56% 67% 2002 80% 100% 78% 67% 2006 100% 100% 100% 58% 2005 100% 88% 100% 42% 2006 60% 75% 60% 25% 2002 100% 57% 89% 40% 2005 100% 100% 100% 73% 2006 100% 88% 100% 73% 2003 60% 75% 70% 58% 2007 100% 86% 91% 100% 2006 100% 50% 90% 20% 2005 40% 13% 56% 7% 2003 80% 84% 43% 67% 2005 20% 72% 70% 13% 2005 100% 78% 88% 53% 2008 80% 88% 60% 73% 2003 80% 50% 89% 8% 2004 100% 88% 90% 47% 2002 80% 86% 64% 33% 2006 100% 86% 90% 67% 2005 60% 100% 78% 67% 2005 100% 72% 90% 25% 2004 100% 0% 80% 0% 2005 80% 75% 78% 60% 2005 100% 75% 86% 7% 2005 100% 100% 80% 50% 2003 40% 75% 100% 67% Rating Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Adequate Effective Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 20 31 4211 7 60 56 61 28 23 13 23 54 428 34 2 154 296 96 160 2113 133 2300 6000 0 552 10 1759 193 399 7 17059 0 9 1705 3 10 34 22 31 3830 7 64 49 61 31 23 13 27 53 443 35 2 154 296 96 167 2142 133 1700 7065 0 552 10 1759 194 400 7 17059 0 9 1837 4 12 35 DF CO BF DF DF CO DF CO CO RD BF BF BF BF CO BF CO CO CO BF CO BF BF CO CA CO BF CO CO CO BF CO CO BF DF CO BF BF CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Homeland Security Border Security and Control between Ports of Entry Coast Guard Fisheries Enforcement Coast Guard Marine Environmental Protection Coast Guard Migrant Interdiction Program Coast Guard: Defense Readiness Coast Guard: Drug Interdiction Coast Guard: Marine Safety Coast Guard: Polar Icebreaking Program Coast Guard: Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security Coast Guard: Search and Rescue Coast Guard: Waterways Management Customs and Border Protection: Automation Modernization Customs and Border Protection: Border Security Inspections and Trade Facilitation Customs and Border Protection: CBP Air and Marine Federal Emergency Management Agency - Mitigation Programs Federal Emergency Management Agency: Grants and Training Office Assistance to Firefighters Grants Federal Emergency Management Agency: Grants and Training Office National Exercise Program Federal Emergency Management Agency: Grants and Training Office Technical Assistance Program Federal Emergency Management Agency: Grants and Training Office Training Program Federal Emergency Management Agency: Homeland Security Grants Programs Federal Emergency Management Agency: Targeted Infrastructure Protection Grants Federal Emergency Management Agency: U.S. Fire Administration Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Recovery Federal Emergency Management Agency: Disaster Response Federal Emergency Management Agency: National Security Federal Emergency Management Agency: Readiness Federal Law Enforcement Training Center Federal Protective Service Homeland Security Operations and Analysis: Classified Programs Homeland Security Operations Center Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Automation Modernization Program Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Detention and Removal Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Office of Investigations Immigration Services National Protection & Programs Division: Cyber Security National Protection & Programs Division: Infrastructure Protection National Protection & Programs Division: National Communications Service National Protection & Programs Division: US-VISIT Exit and Entry System for Visitors Office of Health Affairs: Medical Coordination Science and Technology: Rapid Prototyping of Countermeasures Science and Technology: Chemical and Biological Science and Technology: Chemical and Explosive Countermeasures Science and Technology: Command, Control and Interoperability Science and Technology: Emerging Homeland Security Threat Detection Science and Technology: Homeland Security University Fellowships Science and Technology: SAFETY ACT Science and Technology: Standards Development for Homeland Security Technology Science and Technology: Threat and Vulnerability, Testing and Assessment Secret Service: Domestic Protectees Secret Service: Financial and Infrastructure Investigations Secret Service: Foreign Protectees and Foreign Missions Secret Service: Protective Intelligence Transportation Security Administration: Air Cargo Security Programs Transportation Security Administration: Aviation Regulation and Enforcement Transportation Security Administration: Federal Air Marshal Service Transportation Security Administration: Flight Crew Training Transportation Security Administration: Passenger & Baggage Screening Technologies Transportation Security Administration: Surface Transportation Security Transportation Security Administration: Transportation Security Officer Workforce Transportation Security Administration: Transportation Security Support Transportation Security Administration: Transportation Vetting and Credentialing Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2007 100% 100% 100% 42% 2003 100% 75% 100% 53% 2003 80% 89% 100% 73% 2004 100% 100% 86% 67% 2006 100% 100% 72% 33% 2007 100% 63% 75% 28% 2005 100% 67% 100% 39% 2004 60% 25% 71% 8% 2006 100% 89% 90% 61% 2007 100% 88% 63% 53% 2007 100% 100% 70% 61% 2006 100% 100% 100% 74% 2005 100% 100% 100% 73% 2006 100% 88% 100% 60% 2005 100% 88% 91% 59% 2007 80% 88% 100% 100% 2005 100% 75% 86% 80% 2005 80% 50% 86% 47% 2005 60% 75% 100% 47% 2008 100% 100% 90% 23% 2006 80% 63% 55% 20% 2006 60% 63% 72% 40% 2004 60% 75% 86% 33% 2004 60% 80% 100% 40% 2006 100% 100% 86% 55% 2006 100% 88% 100% 49% 2005 88% 63% 86% 35% 2007 80% 88% 72% 26% 2006 100% 97% 72% 20% 2005 80% 72% 72% 33% 2008 100% 100% 100% 61% 2003 100% 100% 86% 67% 2004 100% 75% 43% 53% 2005 80% 100% 86% 53% 2007 60% 50% 72% 13% 2006 80% 10% 70% 47% 2005 100% 75% 72% 60% 2006 100% 80% 86% 53% 2006 80% 38% 85% 20% 2005 100% 89% 100% 53% 2008 100% 100% 86% 84% 2006 40% 20% 63% 14% 2006 40% 39% 43% 20% 2005 100% 99% 98% 42% 2005 80% 88% 100% 67% 2008 100% 100% 86% 80% 2004 100% 100% 84% 45% 2004 80% 100% 63% 26% 2005 100% 100% 100% 93% 2006 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 100% 100% 100% 78% 2004 100% 100% 100% 90% 2005 60% 89% 82% 22% 2005 60% 78% 73% 13% 2008 80% 88% 86% 60% 2005 100% 63% 72% 0% 2008 100% 78% 75% 53% 2008 100% 88% 86% 50% 2007 100% 88% 100% 47% 2006 80% 63% 57% 8% 2006 60% 75% 43% 13% Rating Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 2473 3423 DF 1015 1111 DF 283 377 RG 594 566 DF 358 606 DF 1128 1415 DF 804 781 RG 86 131 DF 1794 2047 DF 1091 1118 DF 1397 1465 DF 442 511 DF 2168 2561 DF 686 800 DF 3679 3758 CO 662 750 CO 264 268 DF 50 32 DF 195 220 DF 820 826 CO 669 878 CO 46 43 DF 4849 3619 DF 644 334 DF 44 173 DF 200 58 DF 275 263 DF 516 613 DF Classified Classified DF Classified Classified DF 30 57 CA 2371 2481 DF 1414 1519 DF 2546 2691 DF 210 314 DF 273 314 DF 136 141 DF 475 300 DF 24 117 DF RD 260 200 DF 117 96 RD 66 75 DF Classified Classified RD 63 50 RD 4 9 DF 30 29 RD Classified Classified RD 1025 996 DF 389 425 DF 140 140 DF 76 77 DF 112 123 RG 233 249 RG 771 819 DF 24 25 DF 833 871 CA 44 63 DF 3518 3269 DF 491 950 DF 99 116 RG CA BF RG CA RG BF RG CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development Housing and Urban Development American Dream Downpayment Initiative Capacity Building for Community Development and Affordable Housing Community Development Block Grant (Formula) Fair Housing Assistance Program Fair Housing Initiatives Program Family Self-Sufficiency Program FHA Multi-Family Mortgage Insurance FHA Single-Family Mortgage Insurance Government National Mortgage Association Healthy Homes HOME (Affordable Housing Block Grant) Homeless Assistance Grants (Competitive) Homeownership Voucher HOPE VI (Severely Distressed Public Housing) Housing Counseling Housing for Persons with Disabilities Housing for the Elderly Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Housing Vouchers Indian Community Development Block Grant Program Indian Housing Loan Guarantees Lead Hazard Grants Manufactured Housing and Standards Native American Housing Block Grants Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight Project-Based Rental Assistance Public Housing Resident Opportunities and Self Sufficiency Rural Housing and Economic Development Section 108 Community Development Loan Guarantee Program Self-help Homeownership Opportunity Program (SHOP) Tribal Housing Activities Loan Guarantees University Partnership Grants: Historically Black Colleges and Universities Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2007 80% 100% 89% 49% 2003 80% 100% 89% 75% 2003 0% 38% 67% 27% 2004 100% 88% 89% 50% 2004 100% 75% 70% 42% 2004 100% 56% 67% 33% 2005 40% 13% 67% 27% 2004 100% 13% 78% 60% 2006 100% 100% 89% 67% 2006 100% 75% 90% 33% 2003 80% 100% 100% 60% 2005 100% 100% 70% 87% 2004 100% 88% 89% 60% 2003 40% 75% 30% 40% 2004 100% 75% 80% 27% 2008 100% 75% 70% 20% 2008 100% 75% 70% 20% 2008 80% 100% 100% 87% 2002 80% 86% 73% 67% 2004 80% 88% 90% 27% 2006 80% 100% 100% 87% 2003 80% 88% 90% 62% 2005 100% 100% 82% 58% 2007 100% 75% 100% 53% 2006 80% 88% 90% 47% 2002 40% 38% 67% 22% 2005 60% 13% 56% 7% 2008 80% 75% 70% 7% 2004 80% 63% 30% 7% 2007 60% 59% 89% 23% 2006 100% 88% 100% 73% 2005 80% 75% 67% 33% 2007 100% 75% 90% 8% Rating Adequate Moderately Effective Ineffective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Ineffective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Ineffective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 10 34 3866 26 24 49 92 77 11 9 1704 1586 37 100 42 237 735 300 16426 62 7 70 16 630 66 6382 6639 28 17 9 27 2 9 10 34 3866 26 24 49 92 77 11 9 1704 1586 0 100 50 237 735 300 16426 62 7 70 16 630 66 6382 6639 28 17 9 27 2 9 BF BF BF BF CO CO CR CR CR CO BF CO CO CO CO CO CO BF CO CO CR CO RG BF RG CA BF CO CO CR CO CR CO CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Justice Arson and Explosives Program Bureau of Justice Statistics Community Oriented Policing Services Crime Victims' Programs Criminal Enterprises Criminal Justice Services Cybercrime Department of Justice General Legal Activities Drug Courts Drug Enforcement Administration FBI Counterintelligence Program FBI Counterterrorism Program FBI Intelligence Federal Detention Activities Firearms Programs -- Integrated Violence Reduction Strategy Immigration Adjudication Justice Prisoner and Alien Transportation System Juvenile Accountability Block Grants Juvenile Justice Programs Multipurpose Law Enforcement Grants National Criminal History Improvement Program National Institute of Justice Prison Construction Prisons Operations Radiation Exposure Compensation Residential Substance Abuse Treatment State Criminal Alien Assistance Program United States Trustees US Attorneys US Marshals Service - Apprehension of Fugitives US Marshals Service- Protection of the Judicial Process Vaccine Injury Compensation Program Violence Against Women Programs Weed and Seed White Collar Crime Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2008 80% 75% 43% 40% 2005 100% 88% 100% 80% 2002 40% 57% 64% 33% 2006 40% 63% 89% 53% 2006 100% 88% 86% 67% 2004 100% 88% 86% 67% 2008 100% 63% 72% 46% 2005 100% 88% 100% 73% 2008 60% 100% 60% 60% 2003 100% 88% 84% 26% 2005 100% 86% 86% 50% 2005 100% 86% 86% 33% 2006 100% 86% 86% 33% 2006 100% 89% 100% 80% 2007 80% 75% 57% 53% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 100% 100% 100% 59% 2002 60% 29% 44% 7% 2006 80% 88% 66% 53% 2005 20% 38% 67% 13% 2003 80% 100% 100% 75% 2005 80% 80% 77% 60% 2005 40% 78% 88% 56% 2007 60% 88% 100% 87% 2006 40% 63% 100% 60% 2002 60% 72% 56% 20% 2003 40% 0% 33% 0% 2005 100% 88% 100% 83% 2007 80% 88% 86% 60% 2007 100% 88% 57% 67% 2008 100% 88% 86% 80% 2005 80% 63% 72% 47% 2006 80% 88% 100% 67% 2004 100% 75% 90% 33% 2003 100% 72% 84% 33% Rating Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 279 35 511 590 1143 445 293 860 15 2811 904 1464 1195 1226 730 238 177 52 332 358 9 37 373 5347 74 9 410 210 1659 273 583 6 383 32 805 266 53 246 590 1179 409 305 905 0 2636 1065 1551 1149 1226 700 261 160 0 0 0 0 35 96 5436 53 0 0 217 1754 306 656 7 385 0 837 DF DF CO BF DF DF DF DF CO DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF BF BF BF BF RD CA DF DF BF BF DF DF DF DF DF BF CO DF CA CA CO CO BF CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Labor Black Lung Benefits Program Bureau of Labor Statistics Department of Labor - Bureau of International Labor Affairs Department of Labor - Women's Bureau Department of Labor: Office of the Solicitor Dislocated Worker National Emergency Grants Employee Benefits Security Administration Employment Service Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Federal Employees Compensation Act H-1B Work Visa for Specialty Occupations - Labor Condition Application Program Homeless Veterans Reintegration Program Job Corps Job Training Apprenticeship Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Program Mine Safety and Health Administration Occupational Safety and Health Administration Office of Disability Employment Policy Office of Federal Contract Compliance Office of Labor-Management Standards Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation Permanent Labor Certification Program Prevailing Wage Determination Program Senior Community Service Employment Program Trade Adjustment Assistance Unemployment Insurance Administration State Grants Veterans' Employment and Training State Grants Wage and Hour Enforcement and Compliance Program Work Incentive Grants Workforce Investment Act - Adult Employment and Training Workforce Investment Act - Dislocated Worker Assistance Workforce Investment Act - Migrant and Seasonal Farmworkers Workforce Investment Act - Native American Programs Workforce Investment Act - Youth Activities Youthbuild Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2003 80% 75% 86% 60% 2003 100% 75% 100% 80% 2004 40% 63% 100% 33% 2005 80% 13% 100% 7% 2006 100% 75% 86% 53% 2007 100% 50% 89% 27% 2004 100% 67% 73% 60% 2004 60% 88% 67% 45% 2007 60% 50% 86% 53% 2008 100% 75% 100% 58% 2004 80% 88% 100% 67% 2006 100% 88% 100% 67% 2007 80% 78% 88% 28% 2005 100% 38% 72% 13% 2005 80% 76% 71% 33% 2003 60% 89% 73% 40% 2007 100% 89% 80% 26% 2006 100% 38% 86% 0% 2004 100% 56% 82% 47% 2005 80% 67% 91% 27% 2007 80% 100% 72% 60% 2004 80% 75% 100% 42% 2003 75% 0% 55% 7% 2003 40% 57% 57% 7% 2007 60% 63% 72% 33% 2003 80% 88% 100% 58% 2005 80% 100% 100% 60% 2006 100% 67% 100% 53% 2005 100% 88% 80% 25% 2005 60% 75% 67% 40% 2003 60% 72% 56% 40% 2003 20% 72% 70% 26% 2004 60% 63% 80% 33% 2008 40% 75% 89% 40% 2006 80% 43% 50% 13% Rating Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Ineffective Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Ineffective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 1330 545 81 10 89 104 139 758 1244 289 13 24 1598 21 146 332 486 27 81 45 411 31 10 523 787 2741 195 176 14 863 1474 83 56 938 60 563 563 83 10 91 160 145 758 1161 249 13 24 1611 21 155 349 503 28 85 47 445 65 10 523 618 3498 195 183 14 863 1493 83 56 938 60 DF DF CO DF DF BF RG BF DF DF DF CO CA DF DF RG RG DF RG RG DF DF RG DF DF BF BF RG CO BF BF CO CO BF CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State State Andean Counterdrug Initiative Anti-Terrorism Assistance Assistance to Developing Countries Assistance to Rebuilding Countries Assistance to Refugees Assistance to Transforming Countries Capital Security Construction Program Contribution to the United Nations Children's Fund and Other Programs Contribution to the United Nations Development Programme Contributions For International Peacekeeping Activities Contributions to International Fisheries Commissions Contributions to International Organizations Contributions to the International Atomic Energy Agency Economic Support Fund - Human Rights and Democracy Fund Economic Support Fund for Africa Economic Support Fund for the Western Hemisphere Export Control Assistance Foreign Service Institute Global Educational and Cultural Exchanges Humanitarian Demining Humanitarian Migrants to Israel Interagency Cooperative Administrative Support Services International Boundary and Water Commission International Information Programs International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Programs, Africa/Asia International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Programs, South Asia International Narcotics Control and Law Enforcement Programs, Western Hemisphere Migration and Refugee Assistance -- Other Population, Refugee and Migration Programs Migration and Refugee Assistance -- Protection Military Assistance to New NATO and NATO Aspirant Nations Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund Nonproliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction Expertise Non-Security Embassy Construction Program Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe Programs President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief: Focus Countries President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief: Global Fund President's Emergency Plan For AIDS Relief: Other Bilateral Programs Protection of Foreign Missions and Officials Public Diplomacy Refugee Admissions to the US Security Assistance for Near East Asia Security Assistance for the Western Hemisphere Security Assistance to Sub-Saharan Africa South Asia Military Assistance State/PKO Global Peace Operations Initiative Support for East European Democracy/Freedom Support Act Terrorist Interdiction Program United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees US Embassy Compound Security Upgrades Visa and Consular Services Worldwide Security Upgrades Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2004 100% 63% 43% 34% 2003 100% 100% 86% 75% 2007 100% 88% 100% 53% 2007 100% 100% 100% 47% 2007 100% 88% 100% 67% 2007 100% 100% 100% 60% 2004 100% 100% 100% 93% 2006 100% 88% 100% 84% 2004 100% 88% 100% 84% 2004 100% 100% 70% 84% 2004 80% 68% 78% 42% 2006 100% 75% 72% 80% 2006 100% 88% 100% 100% 2004 100% 63% 80% 47% 2005 100% 75% 80% 47% 2004 100% 90% 80% 52% 2004 100% 100% 100% 80% 2006 100% 100% 100% 75% 2004 100% 100% 100% 93% 2004 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 100% 88% 100% 84% 2005 90% 88% 86% 42% 2006 100% 89% 100% 87% 2006 80% 63% 57% 33% 2005 100% 75% 43% 33% 2006 80% 75% 72% 25% 2004 100% 75% 43% 33% 2005 100% 100% 100% 87% 2005 100% 100% 100% 92% 2002 100% 72% 86% 75% 2004 100% 88% 100% 80% 2004 100% 100% 80% 60% 2004 80% 100% 100% 80% 2003 100% 86% 84% 75% 2005 100% 100% 90% 50% 2005 100% 88% 67% 47% 2005 100% 63% 90% 27% 2005 80% 75% 90% 60% 2006 80% 50% 71% 47% 2004 100% 88% 100% 75% 2006 100% 88% 86% 47% 2006 100% 100% 100% 80% 2003 100% 72% 84% 67% 2005 100% 100% 100% 87% 2007 100% 88% 100% 85% 2004 100% 100% 89% 80% 2004 100% 100% 100% 70% 2004 100% 100% 100% 92% 2006 100% 100% 100% 74% 2004 100% 88% 100% 87% 2004 100% 100% 100% 84% Rating Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 320 131 1345 791 197 157 844 126 109 2064 26 1472 132 63 277 144 43 122 501 65 40 1297 118 55 32 294 87 192 201 73 37 52 0 17 4720 841 550 23 36 233 3826 121 81 316 81 940 5 452 99 3599 747 407 145 1361 1241 143 138 1004 128 109 1497 22 1595 137 258 558 124 45 126 522 64 30 1469 118 55 65 282 605 152 154 91 34 56 0 23 8662 500 1205 18 37 275 4202 129 103 319 96 690 12 337 108 3687 948 DF DF CO CO BF CO CA DF BF DF BF DF BF CO CO CO DF DF CO DF BF DF DF DF DF DF DF CO BF DF DF DF CA DF CO BF CO BF DF CO DF DF DF DF DF CO DF BF CA DF DF CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior the Interior Bureau of Indian Affairs - Dam Safety and Dam Maintenance Bureau of Indian Affairs - Economic Development Guaranteed Loans Bureau of Indian Affairs - Forestry Management Bureau of Indian Affairs - Housing Improvement Bureau of Indian Affairs - Human Services Bureau of Indian Affairs - Indian Land Consolidation Bureau of Indian Affairs - Job Placement and Training Bureau of Indian Affairs - K-12 School Construction Bureau of Indian Affairs - K-12 School Operations Bureau of Indian Affairs - Law Enforcement Bureau of Indian Affairs - Natural Resource Programs Bureau of Indian Affairs - Operation and Maintenance of Irrigation Projects Bureau of Indian Affairs - Operation and Maintenance of Roads Bureau of Indian Affairs - Realty and Trust Bureau of Indian Affairs - Tribal Colleges Bureau of Indian Affairs - Tribal Courts Bureau of Land Management - Energy and Minerals Management Bureau of Land Management - Mining Law Administration Bureau of Land Management - Realty and Ownership Management Bureau of Land Management - Recreation Management Bureau of Land Management - Resource Management Bureau of Land Management - Southern Nevada Land Sales Bureau of Reclamation - Hydropower Bureau of Reclamation - Recreation and Concessions Bureau of Reclamation - Rural Water Supply Projects Bureau of Reclamation - Safety of Dams Program Bureau of Reclamation - Science and Technology Program Bureau of Reclamation - Site Security Bureau of Reclamation - Water Management - Project Planning and Construction Bureau of Reclamation -- Water Management & Environmental Mitigation Bureau of Reclamation - Water Reuse and Recycling Bureau of Reclamation Water Management - Operation and Maintenance Bureau of Reclamation: California Federal Bay-Delta (CALFED) Bureau of Reclamation: Central Valley Project Improvement Act Department of the Interior - Central Utah Project Department of the Interior - Land and Water Conservation Fund Land Acquisition Department of the Interior - Wildland Fire Management Fish and Wildlife Service - Endangered Species Fish and Wildlife Service - Fisheries Fish and Wildlife Service - Habitat Conservation Fish and Wildlife Service - Migratory Bird Management and Conservation Fish and Wildlife Service - National Wildlife Refuge System Fish and Wildlife Service - Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Minerals Management Service - Minerals Revenue Management Minerals Management Service - Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Studies Minerals Management Service - Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Evaluation and Leasing Minerals Management Service - Outer Continental Shelf Minerals Regulation and Compliance National Park Service - Concessions Management National Park Service - Cultural Resource Stewardship National Park Service - Facility Maintenance National Park Service - Heritage Partnership National Park Service - Land and Water Conservation Fund State Grants National Park Service - National Historic Preservation National Park Service - Natural Resource Stewardship National Park Service - Park Police National Park Service - Technical Assistance National Park Service - Visitor Services Office of Surface Mining - Federal Managed Regulation of Surface Coal Mining and Abandoned Mine Land Office of Surface Mining - State Managed Abandoned Coal Mine Land Reclamation Office of Surface Mining - State Managed Regulation of Surface Coal Mining US Geological Survey - Biological Information Management and Delivery US Geological Survey - Biological Research and Monitoring US Geological Survey - Coastal and Marine Geology US Geological Survey - Energy Resource Assessments US Geological Survey - Geographic Research, Investigations, and Remote Sensing US Geological Survey - Geologic Hazard Assessments US Geological Survey - Mineral Resource Assessments US Geological Survey - National Cooperative Geological Mapping US Geological Survey - Water Information Collection and Dissemination US Geological Survey - Water Resources Research Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 80% 100% 88% 78% 2005 100% 63% 89% 33% 2003 100% 84% 97% 32% 2005 40% 13% 72% 27% 2006 100% 88% 86% 25% 2002 75% 50% 70% 75% 2004 80% 100% 100% 53% 2007 80% 89% 75% 28% 2002 100% 86% 72% 27% 2007 100% 88% 100% 20% 2006 100% 88% 100% 26% 2005 80% 13% 57% 17% 2008 80% 75% 86% 26% 2006 80% 38% 100% 20% 2004 100% 75% 78% 26% 2003 40% 25% 0% 0% 2003 80% 63% 100% 25% 2005 60% 22% 73% 7% 2004 60% 38% 86% 42% 2003 100% 50% 100% 32% 2006 100% 50% 72% 33% 2004 80% 13% 71% 20% 2003 100% 100% 100% 84% 2004 80% 44% 75% 33% 2002 60% 63% 82% 39% 2005 100% 75% 100% 80% 2003 100% 100% 100% 73% 2005 100% 78% 100% 50% 2007 100% 67% 100% 67% 2007 100% 75% 72% 40% 2002 100% 86% 55% 60% 2005 60% 89% 100% 44% 2006 80% 89% 75% 26% 2006 80% 75% 86% 47% 2005 80% 78% 88% 56% 2004 20% 13% 43% 0% 2005 100% 50% 57% 33% 2005 40% 0% 64% 6% 2006 80% 81% 90% 87% 2006 80% 63% 100% 53% 2008 100% 88% 90% 53% 2007 100% 100% 86% 26% 2005 100% 11% 82% 20% 2007 100% 90% 91% 62% 2002 100% 100% 72% 75% 2004 80% 88% 86% 67% 2005 100% 89% 100% 78% 2005 100% 88% 43% 33% 2004 100% 75% 57% 53% 2008 100% 89% 75% 76% 2005 40% 13% 22% 0% 2003 80% 0% 44% 0% 2003 100% 75% 89% 75% 2003 100% 88% 100% 68% 2006 100% 88% 57% 53% 2005 80% 63% 86% 26% 2005 100% 63% 57% 75% 2006 100% 100% 100% 78% 2007 80% 88% 100% 75% 2006 100% 100% 100% 87% 2005 100% 90% 88% 60% 2005 100% 80% 100% 60% 2006 100% 90% 100% 67% 2003 100% 90% 88% 73% 2004 100% 100% 100% 80% 2003 80% 80% 91% 80% 2003 100% 90% 88% 67% 2005 100% 80% 100% 67% 2004 100% 90% 88% 53% 2004 100% 90% 88% 53% Rating Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 43 6 42 14 126 10 8 143 555 228 92 24 26 96 112 14 159 35 130 74 342 105 59 10 80 76 14 35 83 180 11 315 40 53 34 65 1192 279 126 95 40 398 905 121 30 63 104 72 103 861 15 26 103 221 211 13 828 64 372 67 22 141 41 26 78 86 51 27 70 143 43 6 42 14 126 0 8 143 555 228 92 24 26 96 112 14 155 35 135 70 354 21 69 16 68 91 14 29 89 185 23 308 32 49 43 67 808 277 126 101 40 434 937 121 30 63 104 86 103 794 15 34 103 221 128 13 800 64 477 75 22 141 41 26 78 86 51 27 70 143 CA CR DF DF DF CA BF CA DF DF DF DF DF DF BF DF DF RG DF DF DF DF CA CA CA DF RD CA CA DF CO CA CA DF CA DF DF RG CO DF DF DF RG DF RD DF RG DF DF CA BF BF BF DF DF DF DF RG BF RG RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD CA CO CA CO RG CO CO RG RD BF CA BF CO CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury the Treasury Administering the Public Debt African Development Fund Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Collect the Revenue Program Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau Protect the Public Program Asian Development Fund Bank Enterprise Award Bank Secrecy Act Administration Bank Secrecy Act Analysis Bank Secrecy Act Data Collection, Retrieval and Sharing Bureau of Engraving and Printing: Protection and Accountability Debt Restructuring for Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Economic and Trade Sanctions Program - Office of Foreign Assets Control Financial and Technical Assistance Financial Management Service Collections Financial Management Service Debt Collection Financial Management Service Government-wide Accounting Financial Management Service Payments Global Environment Facility Internal Revenue Service Criminal Investigations Internal Revenue Service Earned Income Tax Credit Compliance Internal Revenue Service Examinations Internal Revenue Service Health Care Tax Credit Administration Internal Revenue Service Retirement Savings Regulatory Program Internal Revenue Service Submission Processing Internal Revenue Service Tax Collection Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Advocate Service Internal Revenue Service Taxpayer Service International Development Association National Bank Supervision New Currency Manufacturing New Markets Tax Credit Thrift Institution and Savings Association Supervision Treasury Technical Assistance Tropical Forest Conservation Act U.S. Mint: Coin Production U.S. Mint: Numismatic Program U.S. Mint: Protection Program Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2003 100% 90% 100% 75% 2003 80% 63% 100% 33% 2005 100% 89% 96% 89% 2002 100% 75% 75% 42% 2005 80% 63% 89% 25% 2002 40% 72% 78% 40% 2006 80% 67% 60% 11% 2006 80% 75% 43% 40% 2005 80% 100% 86% 67% 2006 100% 100% 100% 87% 2007 80% 88% 78% 60% 2002 100% 70% 70% 40% 2004 80% 88% 80% 20% 2004 100% 88% 100% 87% 2003 100% 84% 98% 86% 2006 100% 100% 72% 67% 2005 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 80% 63% 89% 17% 2005 100% 100% 84% 58% 2002 100% 60% 69% 8% 2005 100% 100% 84% 58% 2006 80% 13% 68% 33% 2006 100% 88% 84% 33% 2005 80% 100% 84% 67% 2008 100% 100% 86% 60% 2004 100% 100% 84% 75% 2004 100% 86% 68% 33% 2002 60% 72% 100% 33% 2002 80% 100% 85% 93% 2003 100% 100% 100% 92% 2004 90% 70% 90% 15% 2002 80% 100% 92% 93% 2003 100% 75% 86% 40% 2007 100% 88% 89% 50% 2002 100% 95% 72% 82% 2004 100% 100% 100% 74% 2005 80% 100% 100% 93% Rating Effective Results Not Demonstrated Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Ineffective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Effective Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 203 134 44 46 99 11 26 28 19 63 44 24 27 17 50 63 271 79 704 167 3925 20 35 1123 2025 164 2200 941 708 493 4 243 66 20 825 945 44 209 135 48 46 99 20 28 31 26 62 10 22 49 17 66 64 282 81 723 161 3939 15 35 1044 1997 166 2307 942 757 469 4 259 46 20 1031 1098 46 DF BF RG RG BF CO RG DF DF DF CR DF CO DF DF DF DF BF DF DF DF DF DF DF Mixed DF DF BF RG DF CO RG DF CR DF DF DF BF Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Transportation Amtrak Bureau of Transportation Statistics Department of Transportation Pipeline Safety Essential Air Service FAA Air Traffic Organization - Technical Operations FAA Air Traffic Organization - Terminal Programs FAA Aviation Safety FAA Grants-in-Aid for Airports FAA Research, Engineering & Development Federal Lands Highway Program Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration - Operations and Programs Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Grant Program Federal Transit Administration - Formula Grant Programs Federal Transit Administration - State Administered Public Transit Grant Programs Federal Transit Administration New Starts Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety Hazardous Materials Transportation Safety - Emergency Preparedness Grants Highway Emergency Relief Program Highway Infrastructure Highway Research and Development/Intelligent Transportation Systems Maritime Administration - Merchant Marine Academy Maritime Administration - State Maritime Schools Maritime Administration Guaranteed Loan Program (Title XI) Maritime Administration Ocean Freight Differential Maritime Administration Ship Disposal Program Maritime Security Program National Highway Traffic Safety Administration - Operations and Research National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Grant Program Railroad Research and Development Railroad Safety Program Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation - Operations and Maintenance Transit Research Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Transportation Research and Development Program Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 30% 75% 17% 17% 2006 100% 88% 72% 73% 2004 100% 90% 93% 67% 2006 80% 56% 75% 6% 2008 100% 88% 72% 33% 2007 100% 100% 72% 59% 2004 100% 89% 55% 61% 2002 80% 72% 64% 80% 2003 100% 90% 88% 92% 2003 100% 88% 100% 67% 2004 100% 100% 100% 60% 2008 100% 100% 78% 55% 2004 100% 100% 100% 84% 2007 100% 100% 89% 75% 2003 100% 88% 100% 67% 2005 80% 67% 100% 61% 2003 100% 75% 88% 75% 2005 100% 75% 89% 50% 2007 60% 88% 56% 53% 2004 80% 100% 100% 74% 2005 100% 100% 100% 67% 2005 100% 88% 100% 80% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 80% 86% 86% 67% 2006 100% 89% 100% 78% 2004 100% 100% 94% 93% 2004 100% 100% 100% 50% 2007 100% 100% 100% 87% 2004 100% 100% 100% 54% 2003 100% 89% 91% 67% 2005 100% 100% 100% 80% 2006 100% 89% 100% 92% 2006 60% 75% 100% 59% 2007 100% 38% 43% 22% Rating Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 1355 27 79 109 2731 2302 1082 3515 147 933 223 195 6653 966 1569 27 28 1145 40097 475 65 15 16 202 28 156 239 599 36 150 18 54 122 5 900 27 92 125 2650 2199 1099 3515 147 1019 230 204 5850 877 1569 28 28 100 41325 430 67 15 69 176 29 157 232 620 34 157 18 54 122 6 DF DF RG CA DF DF RG CO RD BF DF BF BF BF CO RG BF BF BF RD DF BF CR DF CA CA RG BF RD RG DF RD CR DF BF RD RD Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Veterans Affairs Department of Veterans Affairs- General Administration Montgomery GI Bill- Veterans Education Benefits Veterans Burial Benefits Veterans Disability Compensation Veterans Health Research and Development Veterans Home Loans Veterans Life Insurance Veterans Medical Care Veterans Pension Vocational Rehabilitation and Employment Program Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2004 100% 88% 57% 67% 2003 60% 63% 86% 42% 2002 100% 86% 72% 73% 2002 20% 0% 57% 0% 2005 80% 64% 100% 78% 2004 40% 0% 33% 40% 2005 100% 88% 86% 53% 2003 55% 75% 70% 60% 2005 60% 50% 86% 47% 2006 80% 88% 100% 40% Rating Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 325 2864 194 38415 525 7304 45 38636 3940 771 337 3760 230 39899 560 7147 42 42991 4066 784 DF DF DF DF RD CR DF DF DF DF CA CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Corps of Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Engineers-Civil Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Works Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration Coastal Storm Damage Reduction Corps of Engineers: Coastal Ports and Harbors Corps of Engineers: Emergency Management Corps of Engineers: Environmental Stewardship Corps of Engineers: Hydropower Corps of Engineers: Recreation Management Corps of Engineers: Regulatory Program Corps of Engineers: Water Storage for Water Supply Flood and Coastal Storm Damage Reduction (with Dam Safety) Flood Damage Reduction Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program Inland Waterways Navigation Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 80% 44% 75% 17% 2004 80% 44% 63% 28% 2004 80% 100% 88% 56% 2004 80% 100% 100% 60% 2005 100% 88% 72% 33% 2004 80% 100% 100% 33% 2004 100% 88% 86% 53% 2003 100% 63% 91% 78% 2006 100% 88% 100% 59% 2008 40% 67% 88% 33% 2002 60% 67% 82% 66% 2005 100% 100% 86% 74% 2008 60% 56% 100% 44% Rating Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Ineffective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 578 41 1055 1565 110 285 267 159 2 1291 1073 138 965 515 75 957 36 95 291 271 180 2 1384 1341 140 1052 CA CA CA DF DF CA DF RG DF CA CA DF DF CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Environmental Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Protection Agency Air Quality Grants and Permitting Alaska Native Village Water Infrastructure Brownfields Revitalization Chesapeake Bay Program Clean Water State Revolving Fund Drinking Water Protection Program Drinking Water Research Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Endocrine Disruptors EPA Acid Rain Program EPA Chemical Risk Review and Reduction EPA Climate Change Programs EPA Ecological Research EPA Enforcement of Environmental Laws (Civil) EPA Enforcement of Environmental Laws (Criminal) EPA Environmental Education EPA Great Lakes Program EPA Human Health Research EPA Indoor Air Quality EPA Lead-Based Paint Risk Reduction Program EPA Oil Spill Control EPA Pesticide Enforcement Grant Program EPA Pesticides and Toxics Research EPA Radiation Protection Program EPA Support for Cleanup of Federal Facilities EPA Tribal General Assistance Program EPA's Recycling, Waste Minimization, and Waste Management Program Global Change Research Human Health Risk Assessment Program Land Protection and Restoration Research Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Program Mobile Source Air Pollution Standards and Certification National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Regional Haze Programs National Ambient Air Quality Standards Research Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grants Ocean, Coastal, and Estuary Protection Pesticide Field Programs Pesticide Registration Pesticide Reregistration Pollution Prevention and New Technologies Research Pollution Prevention Program Public Water System Supervision Grant Program Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Corrective Action Stratospheric Ozone Protection Superfund Remedial Action Superfund Removal Surface Water Protection Toxic Air Pollutants - Regulations and Federal Support U. S.-Mexico Border Water Infrastructure Underground Injection Control Grant Program Underground Storage Tank Program Water Pollution Control Grants Water Quality Research Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 60% 44% 77% 13% 2006 80% 88% 22% 53% 2003 100% 50% 90% 17% 2006 100% 88% 91% 67% 2004 100% 50% 78% 26% 2006 100% 78% 90% 40% 2005 100% 50% 82% 27% 2004 100% 63% 89% 33% 2004 80% 70% 91% 26% 2003 80% 78% 91% 84% 2007 80% 100% 86% 73% 2004 80% 90% 63% 60% 2007 100% 70% 88% 53% 2004 100% 63% 100% 25% 2004 100% 75% 100% 33% 2004 60% 75% 90% 13% 2007 100% 100% 75% 47% 2005 80% 70% 91% 40% 2005 80% 75% 89% 60% 2005 100% 78% 77% 72% 2005 80% 78% 73% 28% 2004 100% 63% 89% 8% 2007 100% 89% 91% 47% 2007 100% 88% 100% 67% 2005 100% 88% 100% 47% 2007 100% 75% 89% 59% 2004 80% 56% 82% 47% 2006 80% 67% 73% 26% 2006 100% 100% 86% 53% 2006 100% 70% 63% 33% 2004 100% 75% 100% 42% 2004 100% 67% 91% 73% 2005 80% 78% 91% 28% 2005 80% 56% 54% 42% 2004 80% 88% 100% 40% 2005 100% 44% 85% 27% 2004 80% 13% 44% 13% 2003 100% 75% 100% 25% 2004 100% 75% 86% 33% 2003 60% 10% 70% 7% 2006 100% 88% 70% 80% 2004 100% 75% 78% 17% 2003 100% 67% 55% 33% 2004 100% 78% 82% 47% 2004 80% 75% 86% 27% 2005 100% 88% 100% 47% 2005 100% 78% 91% 50% 2004 80% 44% 73% 40% 2004 100% 63% 89% 20% 2004 100% 75% 89% 17% 2006 100% 89% 92% 73% 2005 60% 75% 89% 40% 2006 100% 60% 64% 40% Rating Ineffective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Ineffective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 193 35 162 31 1084 111 70 837 19 20 45 108 86 472 49 6 52 61 35 27 12 19 30 26 32 57 182 16 49 43 72 70 101 78 199 36 38 43 56 24 25 98 39 15 585 251 193 95 49 11 53 222 51 169 25 167 29 689 100 60 829 19 19 46 98 79 476 50 9 56 62 34 26 13 18 26 28 31 56 182 20 52 45 75 73 99 80 201 64 37 42 55 22 21 98 41 15 600 242 193 95 20 11 57 218 57 BF BF CO DF BF DF RD BF CO RG DF DF RD DF DF CO DF RD DF BF RG BF RD DF DF BF RG RD RD RD BF RG RG RD BF BF BF DF DF RD CO BF RG RG DF DF RG RG BF BF BF BF RD RG BF RG CO RD CO RD CO CO BF RG BF CO CO CO RG CO RG CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name General General General General General General General General General General General General General General General General Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Services Administration Asset Management of General Services Administration-Owned Real Property General Services Administration - Assisted Acquistion Services (AAS) Portfolio General Services Administration - General Supplies and Services (GSS) Portfolio General Services Administration - National Furniture Center General Services Administration - New Construction General Services Administration - Office of Governmentwide Policy General Services Administration - Personal Property Management General Services Administration - Real Property Disposal General Services Administration - Real Property Leasing General Services Administration - Transportation Management General Services Administration - Travel Management General Services Administration - USA Services General Services Administration - Vehicle Acquisition General Services Administration - Vehicle Leasing General Services Administration Charge Card Services GSA Integrated Technology Services Portfolio Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2007 90% 100% 100% 95% 2007 44% 85% 100% 33% 2007 66% 88% 100% 40% 2006 95% 89% 100% 64% 2005 90% 100% 100% 95% 2006 100% 78% 80% 67% 2005 80% 88% 100% 59% 2008 100% 88% 86% 87% 2005 90% 89% 100% 72% 2006 46% 100% 100% 67% 2006 60% 88% 100% 53% 2006 100% 75% 100% 80% 2004 100% 88% 100% 40% 2004 100% 89% 100% 67% 2006 95% 88% 100% 87% 2007 80% 88% 100% 60% Rating Effective Adequate Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 2454 3774 1174 160 851 45 30 52 4516 18 16 44 1347 1042 10 1194 2625 3796 1196 124 725 53 39 53 4795 22 20 45 1360 1097 10 1270 CA DF DF CA CA RG DF DF CA DF DF DF CA CA DF DF Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name International International International International International International International International International International International International International International Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Assistance Programs Africa Child Survival and Health Child Survival and Health - Population Child Survival and Health for Latin America and the Caribbean Development Assistance to Latin America and the Caribbean Development Credit Authority Food Aid for Emergencies and Development (Public Law 480 Title II) Inter-American Foundation International Disaster Assistance Office of Transition Initiatives Overseas Private Investment Corporation - Finance Overseas Private Investment Corporation - Insurance US Agency for International Development Administration and Capital Investment US Agency for International Development Climate Change Program USAID's Development Assistance for Sub-Saharan Africa Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 80% 88% 60% 42% 2002 100% 72% 46% 83% 2004 100% 88% 80% 60% 2004 100% 88% 80% 60% 2005 100% 100% 89% 58% 2003 80% 86% 64% 46% 2005 100% 88% 100% 67% 2005 100% 75% 86% 25% 2003 100% 75% 80% 73% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2006 100% 100% 100% 67% 2004 100% 89% 88% 46% 2002 100% 72% 73% 33% 2005 80% 88% 80% 50% Rating Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 548 457 139 262 29 2061 21 526 40 45 -199 875 0 677 741 327 134 240 29 1606 21 670 47 52 -177 810 0 811 CO CO CO CO CR CO CO DF CO CR CR CA CO CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name National National National National National National National National National National National National National Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Aeronautics and Space Administration Constellation Systems Integrated Enterprise Management International Space Station NASA Advanced Capabilities in Space Exploration NASA Aeronautics Technology NASA Astronomy and Astrophysics Research NASA Earth Science NASA Earth-Sun System Research NASA Education Program NASA Innovative Partnerships Solar System Exploration Space and Flight Support Space Shuttle Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 100% 78% 88% 40% 2006 80% 100% 88% 67% 2008 100% 100% 88% 80% 2007 100% 90% 75% 45% 2007 100% 100% 91% 78% 2007 100% 100% 75% 47% 2008 100% 100% 83% 72% 2005 100% 100% 84% 74% 2008 100% 100% 80% 53% 2008 100% 100% 89% 61% 2006 100% 100% 91% 74% 2007 100% 100% 88% 61% 2005 100% 89% 50% 33% Rating Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Adequate Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 2870 71 1469 755 594 1611 1199 2174 116 189 1587 397 3997 3103 84 1813 654 505 1585 1235 2496 147 125 1390 542 3951 CA CA CA RD RD RD RD RD DF CA RD CA CA CO CO CO CO CO CO RD CO CA CA CA CA CA CA Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name National National National National National National National National National National National Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Science Foundation Capability Enhancement of Researchers, Institutions, and Small Businesses Construction and Operations of Research Facilities Federally Funded Research and Development Centers Fundamental Science and Engineering Research Investment in Research Infrastructure and Instrumentation K-12 Math and Science Education Polar Research Tools, Facilities and Logistics Science and Engineering Centers Programs Support for Individual Researchers Support for Research Institutions Support for Small Research Collaborations Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2006 100% 100% 100% 83% 2003 100% 100% 100% 90% 2005 100% 100% 100% 84% 2005 100% 100% 100% 87% 2006 100% 100% 100% 80% 2008 100% 89% 90% 60% 2004 100% 100% 100% 89% 2006 100% 100% 100% 87% 2003 100% 91% 100% 83% 2004 100% 100% 100% 78% 2004 100% 100% 100% 78% Rating Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 264 509 184 2462 555 147 342 258 592 150 244 258 535 181 2490 544 148 339 251 537 153 247 RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD RD CO CA CO CO CO CO CA CO CO CO CO CO CA CO Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Office of Office of Office of Office of Office of Office of Office of Office of Office of Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Personnel Management Management Management Management Management Management Management Management Management Center for Talent Services - HR Products and Services for Federal Agencies Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Federal Employees Health Benefits Federal Employees Retirement Federal Personnel Background Investigations Human Capital Program Inspector General Oversight of Federal Health Benefits Program Leadership Capacity Merit System Compliance Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 100% 88% 100% 60% 2004 100% 63% 86% 20% 2004 80% 75% 86% 20% 2007 100% 75% 86% 20% 2006 100% 88% 100% 26% 2006 80% 100% 100% 28% 2003 100% 100% 100% 93% 2006 60% 63% 100% 20% 2005 100% 100% 72% 20% Rating Moderately Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 396 3955 35452 63912 906 44 19 47 13 208 3932 37630 67623 715 41 18 50 14 DF DF DF DF DF RG DF DF DF Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Small Small Small Small Small Small Small Small Small Small Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration Business Administration 8(a) Business Development Program Disaster Loan Program Historically Underutilized Business Zone - HUBZone Section 504 Certified Development Company Guaranteed Loan Program Section 7(a) Guaranteed Loan Program Service Corps of Retired Executives Small Business Assistance Small Business Development Centers Small Business Investment Companies Debentures Small Business Surety Bonds Women's Business Centers Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 40% 88% 86% 33% 2004 100% 100% 100% 73% 2005 100% 88% 100% 46% 2007 100% 88% 100% 47% 2007 100% 88% 100% 60% 2004 80% 88% 100% 60% 2004 60% 100% 100% 67% 2007 80% 100% 100% 67% 2005 80% 88% 100% 40% 2006 80% 75% 100% 67% Rating Adequate Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Adequate Moderately Effective Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 52 546 9 25 87 11 111 17 7 23 48 350 8 28 87 10 102 19 10 22 DF CR DF CR CR BF BF CR DF DF Prog ram P Desig urpose & n (20 %) Plan ning (10% ) Resu lt Detailed PART assessments are available at: http://www.ExpectMore.gov Man agem ent (2 0 s (50 %) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) 2008 Annual Update Published on 1/14/2009 %) Agency Name PART Program Name Last Year Assessed Section 1 Section 2 Section 3 Section 4 2005 2004 2006 2005 2004 2005 2004 2007 2008 2006 2006 2004 2006 2007 2006 2005 2005 2004 2004 2003 2006 2006 2002 2005 2006 2006 2005 2006 2008 2006 2008 2008 2003 2007 2008 2006 2008 2004 2007 2003 2004 2006 2005 2004 2004 2005 2005 2003 2004 2007 2003 2007 2003 2007 2003 2003 2003 2005 2007 2007 2003 2004 2006 2007 2005 2007 2005 2007 2006 2003 2002 2002 2007 2005 2006 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 40% 100% 100% 100% 100% 80% 100% 60% 80% 80% 60% 80% 60% 100% 80% 60% 75% 100% 100% 100% 80% 80% 100% 100% 80% 60% 80% 80% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 100% 80% 80% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 60% 80% 60% 80% 60% 100% 100% 80% 88% 75% 100% 100% 88% 100% 88% 100% 100% 100% 38% 71% 89% 63% 63% 100% 11% 50% 75% 54% 67% 56% 86% 33% 0% 0% 11% 22% 67% 67% 100% 100% 43% 50% 57% 89% 50% 63% 88% 75% 89% 100% 100% 63% 88% 78% 67% 78% 89% 89% 78% 88% 67% 75% 50% 38% 30% 90% 100% 100% 43% 57% 100% 100% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 88% 89% 78% 100% 100% 72% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 43% 100% 100% 100% 100% 89% 75% 100% 100% 90% 88% 100% 100% 39% 25% 18% 31% 33% 80% 80% 100% 100% 70% 57% 71% 100% 90% 100% 100% 86% 86% 100% 100% 92% 100% 100% 91% 100% 100% 90% 100% 100% 70% 89% 80% 60% 70% 100% 86% 86% 82% 86% 80% 80% 86% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 91% 100% 100% 90% 100% 75% 47% 80% 100% 67% 75% 50% 84% 84% 80% 8% 67% 78% 17% 26% 40% 11% 27% 47% 39% 50% 40% 67% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 47% 67% 87% 87% 40% 8% 20% 87% 26% 26% 33% 42% 17% 80% 89% 80% 60% 84% 56% 84% 89% 80% 84% 84% 6% 33% 42% 11% 7% 84% 87% 87% 47% 42% 93% 78% 57% 80% 95% 67% 75% 58% 84% 89% 80% 84% 42% Rating Effective Adequate Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Ineffective Adequate Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Moderately Effective Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Effective Adequate Adequate Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Adequate Adequate Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Effective Results Not Demonstrated Results Not Demonstrated Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Moderately Effective Effective Moderately Effective Effective Effective Adequate Program Funding Level (dollars in millions) 2009 CR 2008 or Actual Enacted Program Type(s): DF = Direct Federal; CR= Credit; RD = Research and Development; BF = Block/Forumla Grant; CO = Competitve Grant; CA= Capital Assets; RG= Regulatory Type 1 Type 2 Type 3 OTHER INDEPENDENT AGENCIES African Development Foundation Appalachian Regional Commission Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Broadcasting Board of Governors Commission on Civil Rights Commodity Futures Trading Commission Consumer Product Safety Commission Corporation for National and Community Service Corporation for National and Community Service Corporation for National and Community Service Corporation for and Offender Community Service for the Court Services National and Supervision Agency District Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Export-Import Bank of the United States Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Federal Election Commission Federal Housing Finance Board Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Federal Trade Commission Delta Regional Authority Denali Commission Millennium Challenge Corporation National Archives and Records Administration National Archives and Records Administration National Credit Union Administration National Credit Union Administration National Credit Union Administration Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of National Drug Control Policy Office of National Drug Control Policy Office of National Drug Control Policy Office of National Drug Control Policy Office of National Drug Control Policy Peace Corps Railroad Retirement Board Railroad Retirement Board Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission Securities and Exchange Commission Smithsonian Institution Smithsonian Institution Social Security Administration Social Security Administration Social Security Administration Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority Tennessee Valley Authority Trade and Development Agency United States Interagency Council on Homelessness African Development Foundation Appalachian Regional Commission Programming Support for US International Broadcasting Engineering and Technical Services for US International Broadcasting Broadcasting to Near East Asia and South Asia Broadcasting to Latin America Broadcasting to East Asia and Eurasia Broadcasting to Africa Broadcasting in Arabic Audience Development for US International Broadcasting Commission on Civil Rights Enforcement of Commodity Futures and Options Markets Consumer Product Safety Commission Learn and Serve AmeriCorps Volunteers in Service to America AmeriCorps State and National Grants AmeriCorps National Civilian Community Corps District of Columbia: Community Supervision Program District of Columbia: Pretrial Services Agency Public Defender Service for the District of Columbia District of Columbia Courts Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Export Import Bank Universal Service Fund High Cost Universal Service Fund for Rural Health Care Providers Universal Service Fund for Low Income Customers Universal Service Fund E-Rate Telecommunications Relay Service Federal Communications Commission - Salaries and Expenses Auctions of Licenses for Electromagnetic Spectrum The Deposit Insurance Fund Federal Deposit and Insurance Corporation: Regulation and Examination Federal Election Laws - Compliance and Enforcement Federal Housing Finance Board Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service Trade Regulation Delta Regional Authority Denali Commission Millennium Challenge Corporation National Archives and Records Administration: Records Services Program National Archives and Records Administration: Electronic Records Services Share Insurance Fund Regulation of Federal Credit Unions Credit Union Loan and Technical Assistance Grant Program Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation Spent Fuel Storage and Transportation Licensing and Inspection Reactor Licensing Reactor Inspection and Performance Assessment Nuclear Materials Users Licensing & Inspection High-Level Waste Repository Fuel Facilities Licensing & Inspection Decommissioning and Low Level Waste Youth Anti-Drug Media Campaign High Intensity Drug Trafficking Areas Drug-Free Communities Support Program Counterdrug Technology Transfer Program Counterdrug Research & Development Peace Corps: International Volunteerism Railroad Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund Rail Industry Pension Fund Securities and Exchange Commission - Full Disclosure Program (Corporate Review) Securities and Exchange Commission - Enforcement Regulation of the Investment Management Industry Regulation of Securities Trading and Market Participants Examining Compliance with Securities Laws Smithsonian Institution Operations and Maintenance Smithsonian Institution Facilities Capital Supplemental Security Income Social Security Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Social Security Disability Insurance Tennessee Valley Authority Resource Stewardship Tennessee Valley Authority Power Tennessee Valley Authority - NOx Emissions Reduction US Trade and Development Agency U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness 35 73 150 110 98 39 89 14 118 26 9 36 63 37 94 257 24 134 45 31 217 329 0 4615 227 980 4783 792 291 85 2366 2366 55 36 43 204 12 53 1752 388 33 7423 75 14 117 27 247 229 57 29 35 28 99 225 79 16 14 355 99 10329 107 298 46 38 200 158 99 43882 507971 106828 82 9666 8 77 2 32 73 150 103 98 39 82 14 106 26 9 41 80 37 94 260 24 140 50 33 224 329 0 4900 251 983 4333 821 313 85 8715 8715 59 36 43 210 12 12 1544 389 45 7984 78 10 300 27 247 229 57 29 35 28 99 225 79 10 10 357 102 10850 111 315 46 43 205 159 105 45158 549134 117048 83 11013 19 61 2 CO CO DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF DF RG BF DF BF CA DF DF DF DF DF CR BF RG RG BF RG RG RG DF RG RG DF DF DF CO CO CO DF CA DF RG CR BF RG RG RG RG RG RG RG CA BF CO CO RD DF DF DF RG DF RG RG DF DF CA DF DF DF CA CA DF CO DF CO CA RG RG BF BF RG RG CO CO