E-voting
Kim Lawson-Jenkins Computer Science Department The George Washington University Washington D.C.
email - jinx55@gwu.edu
Help America Vote Act (HAVA)
Passed October 29, 2002 Gives funds to states that replace punch card and lever voting machines by the 2006 elections
Amount of funds – $3.8 Billion Touch screen voting systems and optically scanned machines can be used as replacements
Optical scan
Direct-Recording Electronic
SOURCE: SHOUP VOTING SOLUTIONS
Voting equipment type
Equipment Type No. of Counties % of registered voters
DREs Optical Scan Punch card
Lever
623 1429 327
264
29.35% 34.93% 12.37%
13.98%
Source – Election Data Services (www.electiondataservices.com)
Transparency in Voting Systems
Why it is needed Registration Source code for DREs Testing voting systems Election day procedures
Why transparency is needed
Confidence and trust in the system
Voter verification
Ability to find and address problems earlier in the process
John Hopkins report Florida registration problems
Even the best most comprehensive tests won’t find all problems with computer systems
Registration
Is there a right to privacy regarding voter registration information?
HAVA supports statewide computerized voter registration databases
Benefits of public access to voter registration information
Less surprises on election day Reduces the need for provisional ballots
Source code of DREs
Five DRE makers have agreed to submit their software to the National Reference Software Library under NIST Private for-profit companies supply the software. Not all mission critical systems support open source software.
Testing Voting Systems
The Federal Voting System Standard
Provides precious few procedures for the laboratories to follow in testing voting systems
Labs are not obligated to disclose all results No observations of the system in practice
Testing Voting Systems
Half dozen major labs
Ciber Inc Wyle Laboratories SysTest Labs
All labs say that DRE companies mandate secrecy of testing results for competitive reasons
Voting process
Voter Registration Vote Casting
Use of DREs primarily affects this area
Multiple languages Better for physically-impared voters Better for highlighting voter errors
Vote Counting Vote Recount
Election Day Activities
Maryland
Voters are given Voter Authority Cards which include
Voter Name, Election Judge’s initials, DRE machine number
On each machine a manual tally is kept of how many voters cast votes using a particular DRE
Election Day Activities
Several times during the day election judges log the total VAC counts for each machine and deliver the VACs to the chief election judge. At the beginning of the election day, a Zero Totals Report for each DRE is printed and posted for interested parties At the end of the election day a Result Totals Report for each DRE is printed and posted on the outside door of the polling place The Result Total Report, the manual tally for each DRE, and the tally information for the VACs should match.
Election Day Activities
Election day audit procedures will find discrepancies regarding the total number of ballots cast. Recounts are a different matter…
Assurance that the ballot cast is included in the ballot count may or may not be better than the situation in 2000. Even paper audit trails would not insure this.
Threats to voting integrity
Influencing an election for a particular national or state candidate – small Raising doubts about the integrity of the election outcome on a national level – not so small
November 3, 2004 and later
The threats for problems with voting systems increase as more time passes if limited progress is made Congress should fully fund the initiatives outlined in HAVA Developers of cryptographic solutions should work with existing DRE manufacturers to implement these solutions in DRE machines Citizens should contact their congressional representatives and the President to make their feelings known on the subject
Conclusions
Recommendations from the TGDC to EAC in early 2005.
Computer Security and Transparency Core Requirements & Testing Usability & Privacy
Conclusions
As with all security issues, administration and implementation of security procedures are critical for voting systems. E-voting situation is analogous to Y2K.
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
43 |
2 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
34 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
39 |
3 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
31 |
1 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
20 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
36 |
3 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
22 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
37 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
40 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
26 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
31 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/1/2008 |
32 |
0 |
0 |
educational
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
208 |
6 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
190 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
250 |
4 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
222 |
2 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
405 |
2 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
319 |
1 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
207 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
174 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
299 |
0 |
0 |
legal
sammyc2007 6/13/2008 |
246 |
0 |
0 |
legal