Agreement for Limo Service - PowerPoint
W
Description
Agreement for Limo Service document sample
Document Sample


Texas A&M
Research Foundation
Proposal Preparation and Submission
The Texas A&M Research Foundation
A private nonprofit corporation
Chartered in 1944 by TAMUS
Closely affiliated with the
University, but Not a State
Agency
Flexible Contracting Ability
One-Stop Shopping
Program Development
Preaward
Contracts and Grants
Purchasing
Travel
Compliance
Proposal Development
Identifies Potential Sponsors
Searches Funding Opportunity
Databases Upon Request
Publishes Monthly Funding
Bulletin
Contact Linda Ramirez
LDR@rf-mail.tamu.edu
979-845-8677
Preaward @ BCD
Receives and Routes
Transmittal Forms
Routes Proposal for Signatures
Contact Jo Spears
jspears@bcd.tamhsc.edu
214-828-8344
Preaward @ TAMRF
Prepares Budgets According to:
Federal/Sponsor Regulations
University/TAMRF Regulations
Coordinates Subcontract and
Collaborative Arrangements
Monitors Sponsor Guidelines for
Compliance
Assembles, Copies, Binds, and
Mails, or Submits Electronically
Sends Campus Copies
Contact Catharine Inbody Corder
ccorder@rf-mail.tamu.edu
979-845-8765
Contracts and Grants
Negotiates the Award
Establishes the Contract or Grant,
and your Account
Administers Spending and
Reimbursing
Provides Monthly Financial Reports
Administers Progress Reporting
And Much, Much More….
Contact Barbara Glover
bglover@tamu.edu
979.845.8656
Purchasing
Acquires Bids for Equipment
Administers Purchase Orders
for Equipment and Large Orders
Assists with Vendor Problems
Provides Procurement Cards
Barbara Glover will assist
you in making contact
with Purchasing
―Logging-In‖ a Proposal
Contact the PA (Proposal
Administrator) 2 Weeks Before the
Deadline
Provide the PA with:
Sponsor
Program Announcement / Program Title
Proposal Title (if possible)
Co-PI’s
Outside Collaborators
Timing is Everything
Log-in 3 Weeks Before the
Deadline if at all Possible
Confirm Finalized Budget and
Justification at Least 4 Working
Days Before Deadline
There Can be No Budget
Changes After Routing
Provide Final Text at Least 24
Hours Before Deadline
What’s the Hurry?
Routing Must Clear all Offices Before
Submission to the Sponsor
Subcontracts and Independent
Consultants Are a Part of Our
Budget
Their Institutionally Authorized
Proposals Must Be Received Before
Routing at BCD
Reported Cost Sharing Must be
Authorized Before Submission to
Sponsor
Routing on Campus
Standard Routing (4 days)
PI, Co-PI(s)
Department Head(s)
Deans (Juanna Moore and Larry Bellinger)
VP for Research (David S. Carlson)
Multi-System Routing (5 days)
Off-Campus Routing (7 days)
Routing on Campus
A Process of Budget Approval by the
Department, College and University
Prior to Submission
Routing takes place while you finalize
the text, but all budget related issues
are complete
Contact the PA with Changes, Don’t
Make Them on the Routing Copy
The Routing Coordinator will Arrange
for Courier Service
Contact Jo Spears
214-828-8344
Quality Control
The Proposal Administrator is Looking for
Compliance
Federal/Sponsor Regulations
University/TAMRF Regulations
Formatting
Broader Impacts/Intellectual Merit
Current and Pending
Biosketch Format
Supplemental Documents
Cost Sharing Documentation
Allowable Costs
Quality Check
Before the Proposal is Copied and Packaged,
One More Person Must Double Check it for
Compliance
OMB Circular A-21 Standards for
Cost Allowability
Reasonable
Allocable
Treated Consistently
These standards apply to both proposals
and active projects. If an unallowable
cost is included in a proposal, the cost
does not become allowable because it
wasn’t removed during the submission
and review process.
Allowable
An Allowable Cost Must
Conform to:
The A-21 (Federal Awards)
Institutional Policy
Terms and Conditions of the
Agreement
Unallowable Costs
Expenses Unallowable for Federal
Reimbursement that are
Reasonable
Necessary
Allocable
Permitted by University Policy
Paid for by the University, but Coded as
Unallowable
Expenses Unallowable by Private Sponsor
Paid for by the University, and Coded
Appropriately
Expenses Unallowable by the University
These Costs will not be Paid for by the University,
and the Individual Must Incur the Cost
Reasonable
Is it Necessary for Performance
of the Award?
Does it Advance the Scope of
Work?
Is it Consistent with Established
Institutional Policies and
Practices?
Allocable
Allocation is the Process of
Assigning a Cost to One or
More Cost Objectives
Responsibility of the PI
Assigned to the Project in
Proportion to the Benefit the
Project will Receive
Fund Availability should not
Determine Allocability
Consistent
Required Costs Incurred for the
Same Purpose, in Like
Circumstances, Handled
Consistently as Direct or Indirect
Costs.
Clerical and Administrative Salaries
Office Supplies
Postage
Local Phone Service
Memberships
Possible Exceptions
Costs Normally Treated as Indirect
can be Treated as Direct Under
Exceptional Circumstances
Major Project
needs significantly beyond those normally
provided by the department
Extensive travel and meeting arrangement
Extensive data accumulation, analysis,
reporting, surveying, tabulation
Specifically Tied to the Project
Must be able to show how the project
benefited through documentation
Explicitly Budgeted
Direct Costs
Salaries and Wages
FTE (Full Time Equivalent) and
Budgeted Salary
FTE 100,000 (maximum
allowable)
Budgeted 75,000
50% Effort = 50,000
FTE Can Not be Increased As a Result
of Receiving Grant Funds
Graduate Students’ Salaries Must Meet
Department Minimum
Direct Costs
Fringe Benefits
15.6% Faculty and Staff
8.35% Students
Used to estimate the costs of Social
Security, Medicare, worker’s comp.
insurance, unemployment insurance and
retirement benefits.
Medical Benefits
Based on Actual Amount if Known
Employee Only 291
Employee/Children 374
Employee/Spouse 423 (used for TBN)
Employee/Family 489
Direct Costs
Materials and Supplies
Individual items costing less than
$5,000, and/or having a lifetime
expectance of less than 1 year.
Laboratory supplies vs. Office
Supplies
A-21 says ―Items such as office supplies,
postage, local telephone costs, and
memberships shall normally be treated
as F&A costs.‖
Direct Costs
Travel
Reimbursed or Advanced
Travel Advance Request Form
A contractual Arrangement
TAMRF Travel Policy
Outlines Allowable Costs
www.rf-web.tamu.edu
Budgeting Travel
Domestic Transportation
Personal Vehicles @ 40.5 cents/mi
Rented Vehicles – Economy Class
Airfare – Economy Class
www.rf-web.tamu.edu
Budgeting Travel
Domestic Lodging and Meals
Subsistence
Requires Receipts for Reimbursement
Separate Meal and Lodging Rates
Maximum Lodging = $175/night
Meal Rates are Based on the City
($51/day Max)
Per Diem
Does Not Require Receipts
Maximum of 129/day for Meals and
Lodging
www.rf-web.tamu.edu
Budgeting Travel
International Transportation
Airfare – Economy Class
Train and Bus Receipts Required
Taxi and Limo
If trains and buses are not available,
or if taxis or limos are cheaper
www.rf-web.tamu.edu
Budgeting Travel
International Lodging and Meals
Per Diem
Based on the U.S. Department of
State Standardized Regulations
Subsistence
Obtain from TAMRF Travel Branch
www.rf-web.tamu.edu
Other Direct Costs
Publication and Page Charges
Long Distance Telephone Calls
Anything Else?
Direct Costs
Exempt from Indirect
Graduate Student Tuition
Now a Mandatory Cost on all
Proposals Including Graduate
Students
Exceptions
Sponsor Disallows Tuition (Rare)
Original Award didn’t Include Tuition
Direct Costs
Exempt from Indirect
Equipment
A Single Item Costing More than
$5,000, and with a Life Longer
than 1 year
Software, When Part of the
Operating System and Initial Set
Up of the Computer
Fabricated Equipment
Subcontracts Beyond the Initial
$25,000
Subcontracts, Consultants, or
Vendors?
Subcontract
Performs Substantive Programmatic
Work Under a Grant or Contract
Responsible for Decision Making and
Measurable Performance Requirements
Adheres to the Federal Compliance
Requirements if Award is Federal
If a University, Retains Intellectual
Property Rights
Subcontracts, Consultants, or
Vendors?
Consultant
Not a TAMU Employee
Proven Professional or Technical
Competence
Performance or Result of Service
is not Controlled
Considered a Work for Hire and
Doesn’t Retain any Rights to the
End Product
Subcontracts, Consultants, or
Vendors?
Vendor
Provides Goods and Services
from an Organization that
Provides Those Same Services as
Part of Normal Business
Operations
Not Subject to the Same
Compliance Requirements as a
Subcontract if Award is Federal
Subcontracts
The First $25,000 per Subcontract is
Subject to F&A Costs
The Subcontracting Institution Must
Submit their Signed/Authorized
Proposal to TAMU
Statement of Work (SOW)
Budget
Signed Letter or Cover Sheet
TAMU PI must Justify the Choice of
and Need for the Subcontract
Indirect Costs, or Facilities and
Administration Costs (F&A)
Costs incurred for the common and
joint activity of the university that can
not be easily or specifically identified
with a particular project (i.e. Not
Allocable).
Federally Negotiated with our
Federal Cognizant Agency
(Department of Health and Human
Services DHHS)
45.5% of Modified Total Direct Costs
(MTDC) for On-Campus work
26.0% MTDC, Off-Campus
Indirect Costs (F&A)
How are they calculated?
45.5% of MTDC
MTDC = Total Direct Costs minus
exempt items
Equipment
Tuition and Fees
Subcontracts beyond $25,000
GYRE
Indirect Costs (F&A)
How are they distributed?
Total Direct Costs $100,000
F&A $ 45,500
Total Award $145,500
71% of F&A to TAMHSC ($32,305)
29% of F&A to TAMRF ($13,195)
Indirect Costs (F&A)
Why so much?
General Administrative Costs
President’s Office
Vice President’s Office
Accounting
Purchasing
Human Resources
Department Administrative Costs
Building and General Purpose Equipment Use
Physical Plant Operation and Maintenance (i.e.
Utilities)
Sponsored Project Administration (VPR, OSP)
Library Expenses
Reduced F&A
Sponsor Limits or Disallows
Indirect Costs
The Off-Campus Rate is Used
60% of the project is off campus
Memo signed by PI, Dept. Head,
Dean, VPR.
Cost Sharing
Any Project Cost Not Borne by
the Sponsor
Reduced F&A Cost Rate
Contributed Effort by the PI
Equipment Purchases
Any Gift or Service Promised
Within Your Text
Cost Sharing
A Cautionary Tale
Any Cost Promised to the Sponsor on
Behalf of the Project is Auditable
Must have an accompanying account number
Unaccounted costs promised to the federal
government can and have been charged to the
University
Federal Money can not be Cost Shared
with Other Sources
If you have federal money for equipment, you
can’t show that as cost sharing on another grant
You can’t state that your time from a federal
grant will cover you on another project—even if
the research is related (Not Allocable).
In NSF Lingo ―Not Required‖ means ―Don’t
Report it to Us.‖
Budgeting Tips
Don’t Overestimate or
Underestimate the Project’s Needs
The Budget Justification is Often the
Weakest Part of the Proposal
A Carefully Prepared Budget Can
Strengthen Your Overall Proposal
Provide Cost Sharing According to
the Sponsor’s Guidelines
Keep Cost Sharing to a Minimum
Related docs
Get documents about "