Get documents about "Action Research on Special Education Funding
W
Description
Action Research on Special Education Funding document sample
Document Sample
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
What actions will occur?
What steps will staff take to
achieve this goal?
ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO LEARNING (e.g. NOVANET & PLATO)
1 #3 Ethnic populations To use curriculum 73.8% of attempted credits 2004- Research computer-based
that are supporting computer were successfully completed. 05 programs (e.g. PLATO /
performing well learning applications to Some 843 students were NovaNet) which will provide
below school increase academic back on track for graduation credit recovery opportunities.
average: African success rate of at risk after being off-track before
Americans – students NovaNET use. Strategy 17:
reading and math, NovaNET Online Learning
Native Americans System Year 2 Program
– math. Incoming Evaluation. (Faircloth and
freshman who are O'Sullivan 2001)
identified as at
risk of not meeting 2005- Implement chosen program.
standard on the 06
WASL and who
do not qualify for
LAP, 504 or
Special Education
services.
2006- Expand program where
07 needed.
ONE COMPUTER CLASSROOM
2 #3 Ethnic populations To use utilize One study of 70 fourth- 2004- Explore best practices of the
that are computer workstations graders being taught a lesson 05 use of computer workstations
performing well and projectors as on Newton's laws of motion and projectors as teaching
below school teaching tools to found that computer animated tools to diversify instruction to
average: African diversify instruction visuals hold intrinsically meet diverse learning styles.
Americans – motivating appeal for
reading and math, learners. Given a choice,
Native Americans most students chose to return
2005- Install projectors in
– math. Incoming to animated graphics rather
06 classrooms.
freshman who are than static images. (Sultan,
identified as at Jones 1997)
risk of not meeting
standard on the
WASL and who
do not qualify for
LAP, 504 or 2005- Use presentation software to
Special Education 06 demonstrate and share
services. problem solving strategies
with students
2006- Install computer workstations
07 and projectors in remodeled
classrooms.
SMART BOARDS
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
What actions will occur?
What steps will staff take to
achieve this goal?
3 #1 LAP, 504 and To use Magic / Using SMART Board in 2004- Investigate Magic Board
Special Education SMART Board Foreign Language Classes 05 technology to provide
students. technology to provide (Gerard, Greene, Widener LAP/IEP/504 identified
LAP/IEP/504 identified 1999) Activities support the students with quick and
students with quick learning process in terms of accurate notes from lessons.
and accurate notes oral skills, the cognitive Investigate cost savings by
from lessons process, and students' reducing need for aides to
motivation and emulation. take notes in class
2005- Install Magic Boards, printers,
06 and other related equipment
in rooms.
2006- Install Magic Boards, printers,
07 and other related equipment
in rooms.
WASL PRACTICE
4 #1 Incoming To utilize computer- Improving Undergraduate 2004- Research computer-based
freshman who are based programs which Learning with Computer- 05 programs which will provide
identified as at will provide students Assisted Assessment students additional practice
risk of not meeting additional practice with (Gretes, Green 2000) In study with WASL type questions
standard on the WASL type questions one, students who took
WASL and who computerized practice exams
do not qualify for averaged one-half letter grade
LAP, 504 or higher than students who did
Special Education not take computerized
services. practice exams, and they
exhibited positive attitudes
toward their practice 2005- Purchase software licenses
experiences. 06 of the chosen programs and
implement in related
curriculum
2006- Evaluate and adapt the
07 implementation based on
successes and limitations
SMALL CLASSROOM COMPUTER LABS
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
What actions will occur?
What steps will staff take to
achieve this goal?
5 #1 Ethnic populations To more holistically The World Wide Web, CD- 2004- Research best practices of
that are integrate creation of ROMs, digital library 05 integrated information
performing well knowledge through the collections, and other sources technology to support math
below school use of information are providing students and and reading in the classroom
average: African technology in the teachers in many classrooms
Americans – classroom across the nation with access
reading and math, to the world’s knowledge in a
Native Americans form that can be easily 2005- Install 4 to 6 station cost-
– math. Incoming searched and downloaded. 06 efficient LTSP computers
freshman who are Students in these classrooms labs in appropriate
identified as at tend to work on more relevant classrooms with related
risk of not meeting real-world problems, where software to achieve math and
standard on the they use technology tools to 2006- reading goals set from
Install more small LTSP
WASL and who do much more than research 07 computer labs in appropriate
do not qualify for information sources. classrooms
LAP, 504 or (Johnson, Schwab, and Foa
Special Education 1999)
CBL'S AND PROBEWARE
6 #1 Ethnic populations To use technology to The inductive findings of the 2004- Research best practices use
that are help students build study indicated that 80% of 05 of integrated hands-on
performing well reading and math the participants conceptually technology tools in the
below school connections between had short-term pedagogical classroom that reinforces
average: African theory and real world and curricula transformation, and supports numerous
Americans – application by through as they successfully learning styles for math and
reading and math, visual, Kinesthetic, and integrated CBL in their reading
Native Americans other learning styles curriculum. With the support
– math. Incoming and Multiple of the ST3 AIRS Model
freshman who are Intelligences framework, the teachers
identified as at overcame contextual barriers
risk of not meeting that included learning to use
standard on the the technology, adequate
WASL and who staff development, and 2005- Implement the use of CBL’s,
do not qualify for pedagogical support. (Wetzel, 06 probeware, and graphing
LAP, 504 or 2001) calculators in appropriate
Special Education classrooms
services.
2006- Continue to implement the
07 use of CBL’s, probeware, and
graphing calculators in
appropriate classrooms
THINKING MAPS
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
What actions will occur?
What steps will staff take to
achieve this goal?
7 #1 Ethnic populations To use technology Reading and writing scores 2004- Investigate the
that are effectively for better change significantly in 05 implementation of Thinking
performing well reading retention and elementary and secondary Map software and best
below school problem-solving schools where Thinking Maps practices
average: African are key factor (Heyerle 1995).
Americans – Math WASL is heavily
reading and math, dependent on reading,
Native Americans writing, and problem solving.
– math. Incoming
freshman who are
identified as at
risk of not meeting
standard on the
WASL and who 2005- Implement use of Thinking
do not qualify for 06 Map software where
LAP, 504 or appropriate
Special Education
services.
2006- Offer before or after school
07 computer lab access for
tutoring of selected students
Alter Title I teaching schedule
a. Alter Title I teaching
schedule
b. Alter Para Educator
schedule
COWS (COMPUTERS ON WHEELS) - AKA - MOBILE LABS
8 #1 Ethnic populations Better enable students “Research shows that more 2004- Explore mobile computer labs
that are in various classrooms students finish high school 05 best practices involving
performing well without computers to and many more consider reading and math increased
below school routinely learn and attending college when they understanding
average: African study with technology routinely learn and study with
Americans – technology. Fewer than half
reading and math, of the students in the ACOT 2005- Implement or add to existing
Native Americans study came into the program 06 mobile labs where
– math. Incoming with any interest in pursuing appropriate
freshman who are college. Overall, in the school
identified as at where the study took place,
risk of not meeting only 15 percent of the
standard on the graduating students went to 2006- Add to existing mobile labs
WASL and who college. Not only did100 07 where appropriate
do not qualify for percent of the ACOT students
LAP, 504 or graduate, but 90 percent went
Special Education on to college! …Students who
VIDEO STORYTELLING
9 #1 Ethnic populations To video storytelling to Student’s creation of 2004- Research best practices use
that are support learning and storyboards and scripts helps 05 of video storytelling tools in
performing well reinforce learner their reading skills. Visual the classroom that reinforces
below school involvement in the literacy helps improve reading reading and writing skills
average: African classroom scores through analytical through support of numerous
Americans – reasoning explored in the learning styles
reading and math, grammar of film exercise. For
Native Americans the past 3 years students
– math. Incoming have been required to make a
freshman who are film in my English class. In
identified as at that time the quality of their
risk of not meeting written work has improved
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
9 #1 Ethnic populations To video storytelling to Student’s creation of
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
that are support learning and storyboards and scripts helps
performing well reinforce learner their reading skills. Visual What actions will occur?
below school involvement in the literacy helps improve reading What steps will staff take to
average: African classroom scores through analytical achieve this goal?
Americans – reasoning explored in the
reading and math, grammar of film exercise. For
Native Americans the past 3 years students
2005- Incorporate the use of video
– math. Incoming have been required to make a
06 storytelling for student
freshman who are film in my English class. In
presentations in various
identified as at that time the quality of their
curricular areas
risk of not meeting written work has improved
standard on the markedly. (Knuth 2004)
WASL and who
do not qualify for
LAP, 504 or
Special Education
services.
2006- Further incorporate the use of
07 video storytelling for student
presentations in other
curricular areas
CHS WEB CONTENT
10 #3 Ethnic populations Provide support to Rationale is missing? 2004- Visit schools that have
that are enhance parent 05 implemented an extensive
performing well communication with web resource system that is
below school their children about accessible to parents
average: African school performance
Americans – and other related
reading and math, activities
Native Americans
Survey parents on their
– math. Incoming
needs from the school to
freshman who are
better support them with
identified as at
accessible information on
risk of not meeting
school activities and student
standard on the
progress
WASL and who
do not qualify for 2005- Web site development as
LAP, 504 or 06 communication tool
Special Education
services.
2006- Update web resources and
07 expand offerings where
needed
STUDENT TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT
Lear y and
s):
ent
(or
s
ning
tegy
ar
Plan
n(
ort):
supp h
g
P o p u g et
ol Y e
Impr ool
o ve m
latio
arc
nale
nol o
l
Goa
Stra
T ar
Sch
n
rese
#
Ratio
Actio
Scho
Tech
Plan
What actions will occur?
What steps will staff take to
achieve this goal?
11 #3 Ethnic populations Provide support to Research has shown that 2004- Visit schools that have
that are enhance existing teachers lack adequate 05 implemented a student
performing well student technology support for the use of technology support program
below school support model information and
average: African communication technologies
Americans – (ICT). In this report, the term
reading and math, "support" is used in its
Native Americans broadest sense, so that it
2005- Develop a cadre of student
– math. Incoming encompasses a wide range of
06 support technicians to sustain
freshman who are resources for teachers. These
on-going technology related
identified as at resources include, but are not
curriculum support to directly
risk of not meeting limited to, facilities, presence
support staff in their
standard on the of a support staff, personal
implementation of technology
WASL and who help and guidance,
related curriculum
do not qualify for professional development,
improvements
LAP, 504 or and professional incentives.
Special Education (Ronnkvist, Dexter, Anderson,
services. 2000) 2006- Have staff complete a PILOT
07 form at beginning of year and
one at the end. Evaluate
feedback from pilot program
Capital High School Improvement Goals
#1 Capital High School will increase the number of students meeting 2008
graduation requirements to the following percentages: 75.8% in reading and 61.2 %
in math.
#2 Capital High School students will demonstrate learning and application of state
goals three and four through a culminating project and education plus plan.
#3 Capital High School staff will reduce the student failure rate by enhancing our
supportive learning environment.
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
quantities and sources, as well as
Principal, Technology None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Course Evaluation of
Committee members schools to audition effectiveness of
representing each related programs. software to achieve
department with an Notes will be taken and goal
emphasis on Special presented to the staff
Education Teachers, for review. Summary report of
Para Educators. strengths and
weaknesses of
program options.
Principal, TOSA for Computers and Introduction to the Site License = $???? Participation in
Professional software site chosen program with Training
Development, license hands-on training. Course Evaluation
Technology Team Personalized help 2005 WASL Reading
Member Teachers, Para reference guides will be and Math
Educators, Tech constructed during the AYP = ????%
Support Individuals training with help from
student technology
support
Principal, TOSA for Purchase extra Introduction to the new Title II Part D or General Participation in
Professional workstations modules Fund Training Course
Development, and licenses Price Per Module = Evaluation 2005
Technology Team as needed $???? WASL Reading and
Member Teachers, Para Math
Educators, Tech AYP = ????%
Support Individuals
Principal, Technology None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members schools to audition Summary report of
representing each related programs. strengths and
department with an Notes will be taken and weaknesses of
emphasis on Special presented to the staff program options.
Education Teachers, for review.
Para Educators.
Principal, TOSA for Presentation Training on use of new 2000 Levy funding Participation in
Professional software hardware Training
Development, 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team and Math AYP =
Member Teachers, Para ????%
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Projectors for Teaching in the One Presentation Software Participation in
each Computer Classroom (Building Budget/OEA Training
classroom Grant) Course Evaluation
Site License = $2000 LOTI Survey
Principal, TOSA for Purchase extra Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional workstations hardware funding from phase II of Training
Development, and projectors the CHS remodel 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team where needed and Math
Member Teachers, Para AYP = ????%
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
Principal, Technology quantities and
None Staff visitation to other sources, as well as
Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members schools to audition Summary report of
representing each equipment and strengths and
department with an classroom practices. weaknesses of
emphasis on Special Notes will be taken and program options.
Education Teachers, presented to the staff
Para Educators. for review.
Principal, TOSA for Magic Board Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional for each hardware funding from phase II of Training
Development, Special the CHS remodel 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team Education 5 Boards = $10,000 and Math AYP =
Member Teachers, Para classroom 5 Printers = $5,000 ????%
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Principal, TOSA for Magic Board Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional for each hardware funding from phase II of Training
Development, additional the CHS remodel 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team classroom if 2 Boards = $4,000 and Math AYP =
Member Teachers, Para needed 2 Printers = $2,000 ????%
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Principal, Technology Staff visitation to other Course Evaluation
Committee members None schools to audition and Visitation funding
representing each observe software use Summary report of
department with an and classroom strengths and
emphasis on Special practices. Have weaknesses of
Education Teachers, discussion and create program options.
Para Educators. action plan best way to
incorporate into current
curriculum.
Principal, TOSA for Program Training on use of new Building software Participation in
Professional selected from software and budget and Title Training
Development, research implement action plan Something Whatever 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team to incorporate into Mystery Money Funding and Math AYP =
Member Teachers, Para existing curriculum. ????%
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Principal, TOSA for Additional Training on use of new Continued dependence Participation in
Professional licenses of software on building software Training
Development, program budget and Title 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team selected from Something Whatever and Math
Member Teachers, Para research Mystery Money Funding AYP = ????%
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
Principal, Technology quantities and
None Staff visitation to other sources, as well as
Visitation funding Course Evaluation of
Committee members schools to observe the effectiveness of
representing each best practices. Notes added support for
department with an will be taken and math and reading
emphasis on Special presented to the staff understanding
Education Teachers, for review.
Para Educators. Summary report of
Principal, TOSA for LTSP Training on use of new 2000 Levy funding strengths and
Participation in
Professional workstations hardware and software Training
Development, LTSP Workstation = 2005 WASL Reading
Technology Team $250 and Math AYP =
Member Teachers, Para ????%
Educators, Tech for
Principal, TOSA LTSP Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional workstations hardware and software funding from phase II of Training
Development, CHS remodel
Technology Team 2005 WASL Reading
Member Teachers, Para LTSP Workstation = and Math
Principal, Technology None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Course Evaluation of
Committee members schools to audition effectiveness of
representing each related programs. student increase in
department with an Notes will be taken and understanding of
emphasis on Special presented to the staff related math and
Education Teachers, for review. reading content
Para Educators.
Summary report of
strengths and
weaknesses of
program options.
Principal, TOSA for CBL’s, Training on use of new 2000 Levy funding Participation in
Professional probeware, hardware and software Training
Development, and graphing
Technology Team calculators for 2005 WASL Reading
Member Teachers, Para each and Math
Educators, Tech appropriate AYP = ????%
Support Individuals classroom
Principal, TOSA for CBL’s, Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional probeware, hardware and software funding from phase II of Training
Development, and graphing CHS remodel
Technology Team calculators for 2005 WASL Reading
Member Teachers, Para each CBL Workstation = and Math
Educators, Tech appropriate $200 AYP = ????%
Support Individuals classroom Probeware = ???
Graphing Calculator =
???
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
Principal, Technology quantities and
None Staff visitation to other sources, as well as
Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members schools to audition with an emphasis will
representing each related programs. be placed on how
department with an Notes will be taken and Capital High School
emphasis on Special presented to the staff will successfully
Education Teachers, for review. implement Thinking
Para Educators. Map process.
Summary report of
strengths and
weaknesses of
program options.
Principal, Technology Thinking Map Training on the use of Train the Trainer PILOT
Committee members Software Thinking Maps for training at ESD ($259)
representing each Reading and 3 hours Building
department with an Comprehension and Staff Development
emphasis on Special other learning Building Staff
Education Teachers, applications Development (3 hours)
Para Educators. and Title II Part D
Principal, TOSA for Purchase Training on use of new Building software Participation in
Professional software software budget Training 2005 WASL
Development, licenses as Reading and Math
Technology Team needed AYP = ????%
Member Teachers, Para
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Principal, Technology None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members schools to audition Summary report of
representing each related programs. strengths and
department with an Notes will be taken and weaknesses of
emphasis on Special presented to the staff program options.
Education Teachers, for review.
Para Educators. for
Principal, TOSA Increase Training on use of new 2000 Levy funding Participation in
Professional mobile labs for hardware and software COW = $25,000.00 Training 2005 WASL
Development, department With printer mobile Reading and Math
Technology Team use as networking and AYP = ????%
Member Teachers, Para necessary projector
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Principal, TOSA for Purchase extra Training on use of new Furniture and fixtures Participation in
Professional workstations hardware funding from phase II of Training 2005 WASL
Development, and projectors the CHS remodel Reading and Math
Technology Team where needed AYP = ????%
Member Teachers, Para
Principal, Technology None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members schools to audition Summary report of
representing each related programs. strengths and
department with an Notes will be taken and weaknesses of
emphasis on Special presented to the staff program options.
Education Teachers, for review.
Para Educators.
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
Principal, TOSA for quantities and
6 portable Using document 6 Hours as well Staff
sources,Building as Participation in
Professional digital video cameras effectively for Development Title II Training Course
Development, cameras Problem-Based Part D or General Fund Evaluation PILOT
Technology Team Learning and / or 6 Dig Cameras = $4000 Tool 2006 WASL
Member Teachers, Para storytelling Math
Educators, Tech AYP = ????
Support Individuals
2006 WASL Reading
AYP = ????
Principal, TOSA for None Using document 6 Hours Building Staff Participation in
Professional cameras effectively for Development Training Course
Development, Problem-Based Evaluation
Technology Team Learning and / or
Member Teachers, Para storytelling PILOT Tool
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals 2006 WASL Math
AYP = ????
2006 WASL Reading
AYP = ????
Technology Committee None Staff visitation to other Visitation funding Summary report of
members representing schools to audition strengths and
each department and related programs. weaknesses of
Technology Coordinator Notes will be taken and program options.
presented to the staff
for review.
Parent Surveys
before and after
implementation
Technology Committee None Provide all staff with Building Staff PILOT
members representing training on web site Development (3 hours)
each department and publishing and
Technology Coordinator management
Technology Committee None None Furniture and fixtures PILOT Parent
members representing funding from phase II of Surveys before and
each department and the CHS remodel after implementation
Technology Coordinator
g
Tech (SW) &
ware HW),
ndin
ort
s
(PD) ment
Deve ional
s
ol s
Need
ces
ble
s
S upp
Stra ion
Plan
and/ gies
(
Resp n(s)
& Fu
Need
ware
or To
o n si
S our
u at
l op
ess
o
te
(TS)
n
Pers
s
Eval
Actio
Hard
Cost
Prof
Soft
Who will provide What HW, SW What professional What is the cost of the How will you evaluate
leadership? Who will do and TS are development does the additional HW, SW, TS the implementation of
the work to make sure needed to staff need in order to and PD needed to reach this strategy? What
that this activity occurs? reach this take the steps to this goal? Include tools will you use?
goal? Include achieve this goal? building and district
Principal, Technology quantities and
None Staff and student sources, as well as
Visitation funding Course Evaluation
Committee members visitation to other Summary report of
representing each schools to audition strengths and
department with an related programs. weaknesses of
emphasis on Special Notes will be taken and program options.
Education Teachers, presented to the staff
Para Educators. for review.
Principal, Technology None None Pizza Money J for the Summary report of
Committee members students from Parent strengths and
representing each Group weaknesses of
department with an program options.
emphasis on Special
Education Teachers,
Para Educators.
Principal, TOSA for None None None PILOT Staff Surveys
Professional before and after
Development, implementation
Technology Team
Member Teachers, Para
Educators, Tech
Support Individuals
Related docs
