Accounting Syllabus Startup - Excel

Description

Accounting Syllabus Startup document sample

Document Sample
scope of work template
							1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW
The following sections describe and outline the key aspects of the project to be addressed, including the objectives and deliverables, the
demographics of the team performing the work, assessments of their cumulative performance, and outlines of the literature that has
supported the development of the content in the following sections.


              Section         Description of Approach                                  Description of Intended Outcomes

             Team             Listings of team members, contact information and        Enable team members to become familiar
          Demographics        brief biographical outlines.                             with and communicate with one another.

                                                                                       Unify the team in the pursuit of several
                              Outline the project mission, background, and five
        Project Description                                                            specific, tangible objectives to satisfy project
                              specific objectives.
                                                                                       and course goals.


                              Systematically review elements of the LSSQTT in          Understand the theoretical basis for project
            Review of         the context of selections from the quality literature,   fundings Understand empirical and anecdotal
            Literature        or other journals relevant to the study of               evidence and lessons learned that will help us
                              technology assessment and innovation.                    solve our problems more efficiently.


                              Individually track assessments of each group
                              member to ensure consistent performance in the      Identify weaknesses early; leverage strengths
           Assessments
                              coordinated pursuit of course and project goals and early.
                              objectives.




        Note: Click on blue links above to view worksheet.
                                                                                   Methodology
There are two overlying, inherent types of objectives with this project. The first, and most obvious, is the academi
 LSSQTT methodologies occurs. The second type of goals are those which would relate to the actual data of the
                                                                         which fall into both categories.



                                          The first objective amont the student development goals is sourced from the course
                                          results. The work and activities of the team should be based upon the instruction and
 Student Development Goals                developed based on the first, which is essentially to say that in order to accomplish t
                                          illustrate mastery of the eight tools and completion of all assigned applications.
SDG 1: To generate a electronic project portfolio composed of all tools completed, improved based on instructor feedback, do

SDG 2: To learn all eight tools and all assigned applications, per the syllabus, with each team member gaining new knowledge



                                          Students will be able to meet the objectives by first studying relevant course materia
                                          course materials and the project as a whole, and finally by applying the skills gained
         Considerations:                  The students will work in a collaborative environment, based on discussion board po
                                          tasks. Leadership will also be cultivated by passing the responsibility of guiding the




                                          These goals center around the development of a group project. Specifically, the stud
  Project Development Goals               molding manufacturer (Chilco), which has operations based in the United States and

PDG 1: To control existing variation in the Chilco organization's production system, while increasing production by 20 percent

PDG 2: Chilco's current defect/rejection rate is 164,487 PPM defective based on 2006 data. The goal is to improve the defect/re

PDG 2: To increase Chilco corporation revenue by 10%. This will occur by applying the LSSQTT to make improvements throug




                                          The overarching goal is to help Chilco increase it's revenue by 10%. To accomplish a
         Considerations:                  to assist with the increase of profitability, we will focus reducing company defects du
                                          of productivity (simple philosophy - product more and make more money, or waste le



                                          A review of the LSSQTT tools indicates we may have some success utilizing Product
   What Tools Can Help Increase           VDGRARS, and Cpk Calc. The concept is to review processes which may enable opti
           Production?                    TRIZ study we can reach out and take a look at other industry processes to determin
                                          recommend to Chilco for adoption.
                                       A review of the LSSQTT tools indicates we may have some success utilizing Product
 What Tools Can Help Decrease
                                       detailed understanding of flawed systems), FMEA, TRIZ, PPP and Cap Calc. We can a
            Waste?                     companies.



                                   As we have already mentioned, decreasing waste and increasing production will help
                                   potential new markets for Chilco. Solid benchmarking studies, while applicable to ot
How Can We Increase Profitability? goals and all of the processes utilized in them, combined with environmental scans,
                                   integrated report which, when final, can be used as the basis for a Chilco strategic p
hodology
 most obvious, is the academic development of a group of students as exploration of the
relate to the actual data of the project itself. Accordingly, the team has developed goals
to both categories.



goals is sourced from the course requirements. We are to conduct a LSSQTT study, and report our
be based upon the instruction and information provided by the instructor. The second goal set is
o say that in order to accomplish the task required by the instructor, the students must be able to
 of all assigned applications.
based on instructor feedback, done in the context of the workbook applications provided.

 member gaining new knowledge and experience.



 studying relevant course materials, second conducting literature reviews applicable to both the
nally by applying the skills gained through an application of the tool based on Chilco company data.
 nt, based on discussion board postings and bi-weekly chats, as well as a division of rudimentary
 the responsibility of guiding the project development among the students as the tools progress.




oup project. Specifically, the students assume the roles of independent contractors for an injection
ns based in the United States and China.

reasing production by 20 percent based on application of lean six sigma principles and tools.

 e goal is to improve the defect/rejection rate by 10% to 45,000 PPM defective within one year.

 TT to make improvements throughout the organization to increase production and reduce scrap.




revenue by 10%. To accomplish a goal which is so broad, it helps to have sub-goals. Accordingly,
cus reducing company defects during the manufacturing process as well as increasing the levels
nd make more money, or waste less and produce more money).



 e some success utilizing Productivity Analysis, FMEA, TRIZ, Lean Analysis, PPP, Cap Calc,
processes which may enable optimizing current processes to increase production. Throught the
er industry processes to determine if there are any potential benchmark processes we can
 e some success utilizing Productivity Analysis, Pareto (to visualize the problem), 8D (to gain very
TRIZ, PPP and Cap Calc. We can also reach out with benchmarking studies to learn from other




nd increasing production will help. Good international marketing studies could also reveal
ng studies, while applicable to other areas, will be beneficial here as well. In short, the two other
bined with environmental scans, marketing research, benchmark studies, will provide an
 the basis for a Chilco strategic plan.
1.2 TEAM DEMOGRAPHICS
             Demographic worksheets are where basic team information is initiated. Each person completes the text box information below, and posts at
             the demographic area in blackboard discussion board/communication area designated by the instructor. This information is posted as
General      individual work, and then the compiler of demographics for the assignment, collects all, and places them in one worksheet for a final
Assistance 1 compilation of the total startup project portfolio document

             Each team member supplies technical data, and biographical sketch information individually as they complete all worksheets in the
             workbook, at startup, and this data remains as part of the project portfolio over time. This enables all on the team, and others, to always have
General      access to the contact information for each other. This also enables all to get to know one another at the project startup, and to have a context
Assistance 2 for operations across the course.

1.2.1 Team Member Technical Data
 Team Member    Team Member                     Team Member            Best Days/Times           Team Member Past LSSQTT/QS/Course/Work
      Name           email                        Phone (s)                For Chats                            Experience


                                                                      M, T, Th 6pm EST or
                                                                      later; weekends tend to
Carper, Michael       mike@wa9pie.net         (208) 699-7336                                    None
                                                                      be committed to
                                                                      coaching little league



                                                                                            This is my 4th course with Dr. Sinn. I have a Quality Specilization,
                                                                                            and I was a Quality Engineer and Tech. Transfer Engineer for 6
                                                                                            years with the Federal Highway Administration; for last 1 1/2
                      mark.chandler@fhwa. H: (608) 298-9466 & W:      any evening; weekends years have been a field operations engineer, involved with
Chandler, Mark
                      dot.gov             608-829-7414                can work, too.        highway projects. My Master's is in Manufacturing Systems
                                                                                            Engineering, w/ a Quality Concentration; I have been a Baldrige-
                                                                                            based examiner in the Wisconsin State Quality Award Program for
                                                                                            several years.
                                                                                           LSSQTT - None; QS - None; Course - No previous courses with Dr.
                                                                                           Sinn, major area of specialization is HRD and Industrial Training;
                                         H: (219) 465-6311 C:
DeMik, Randy    randydemik@aol.com                                Varies                   Work Experience - 27 years in Airline Industry, Boeing 737 Captain
                                         (219) 743-6841
                                                                                           and LCA (Line Check Airmen - Trainer and evaluator of airline
                                                                                           flight crews)




                                                                                           LSSQTT - None; QS - SPC experience; No previous courses with
                                                                                           Dr. Sinn. My major area of specialization is MFG Systems; Work
                michael.devore@cinci H: (513) 683-6987
DeVore, Mike                                                      any evening              Experience - 8 years as mechanical engineer in industry, 18 years
                nnatistate.edu       W:(513) 569-1746
                                                                                           college instructor w/ 8 years as program chair of Mechanical
                                                                                           Engineering Technology program.



                                                                                        LSSQTT: Six Sigma Black Belt certification from PSC in Chicago;
                                                                                        Masters Certificate from EIU in Quality Systems; ASQ-CQA since
                                       Work- 773-437-2412      Frequent travel dictates
                travis.felton@ugnusa.c                                                  1998; QS Lead Auditor certified, ISO 9000:000 Lead Auditor
Felton, Jason                          Home-815-464-6273 Cell- day by day
                om                                                                      certified, ISO 14001 Lead Auditor certified, ISO/TS 16949 Internal
                                       773-490-0455            consideration for chats.
                                                                                        Auditor certified; Changed careers in 2004- prior to that- 10 years
                                                                                        in Quality Management




                jared.phipps@iraq.cen                             Any day, 8PM central
Phipps, Jared                         Not Avail                                            Did a lot of LSSQTT type work during my MBA, but that is it
                tcom.mil                                          or later
                                          Cell-703-835-6336                                  This is my 5th or 6th course with Dr. Sinn, with only one remaining
                                                                    Any day, 8PM central
Radziwill, Nicole   nradziwi@nrao.edu     Home 434-296-7829                                  LSSQTT class to take in the fall. CMQ/OE certified, 12 yrs
                                                                    or later
                                          Work 434-244-6829                                  experience (half consulting, half in sr/exec mgmt at a national lab).




                                                                                             LSSQTT: Six Sigma practitioner at two companies, Six Sigma Black
                                        Work- 574-371-8679                                   Belt certifications from ASQ (American Society for Quality) and Six
                                                                Generally any day,
Stamm, Scott        sastamm@comcast.net Home-574-269-6491 Cell-                              Sigma Qualtec; QS: Certification in Quality Mgmt. from Indiana
                                                                evenings best time
                                        574-527-1769                                         University; Course: First Course w/ Dr. Sinn; Work Experience: 27
                                                                                             years in Manufacturing and Quality.




                                                                                            No experience with LSSQTT and QS. This is my first course with
                                          Home: 610-873-3495
                                                                    Mosts days of the week, Dr. Sinn. First course dealing with these topics. My work
Thomas, Mark W.     mthomas@gvsd.org      Work: 610-889-2125 x
                                                                    evenings are best.      experince includes 2 years of K-12 teaching (K and alt. ed.), 6 years
                                          2301 Cell: 610-306-5580
                                                                                            as Network Administrator, 3 years as Database Specialist.




                                                                                             Very little experience with formal QS approaches and methods; I
                                                                                             do teach an undergraduate Production & Operations Management
                                          Work- 360-744-8752
                                                                  Generally any day,         course that addresses various QS areas at a high-level, but I bring
Wood, Evan          evwood@taylor.edu     Home-260-492-0168 Cell-
                                                                  evenings best time         in outside experts: First Course w/ Dr. Sinn; Work Experience: 3
                                          937-409-1217
                                                                                             years a corporate trainer, 4 years in IT Product Management and 3
                                                                                             years university teaching.
  Return to 1.0                                                                                                                                 Return Home




1.2.2 Team Member Brief Biographical Sketch




       Name                                                             Brief Biographical Sketch
                  I now work for Coldwater Creek as Vice President of Technology and I am based in Coeur d'Alene, ID. I joined the company as Divisional Vice
                  President of Technology Operations in May of 2004, and I'm responsible for the design, operations, and security of the technology infrastructure.
                  I have 19 years of experience in the engineering and support of information technologies in the retail, healthcare, financial services, wireless, and
Carper, Michael   telecommunications industries. I've had articles realted to leadership in technology featured in Computerworld, CIO Decisions Magazine, and in
                  case studies by Dell, Cisco, and Intel. I am a member of the Strategic Advisory Board for the IT Infrastructure Management Association and for
                  the Advisory Board for CIO Decisions Magazine. My wife and I have three children - 19 (girl), 16 (boy), and 8 (girl). I enjoy being outdoors,
                  baseball, ham radio (33 yrs), and playing a loud electric guitar.


                  Personal: I live in Fitchburg, WI (adjacent and south of Madison) with my charming wife Kathryn & no children, but two wire haired fox terriers;
                  Kathryn has home office, leaving employer of 15 yrs. to become partner in recruiting group.
                  Educational: BS Degree, Geo-Engineering, U. of Minnesota; Master in Manufacturing Systems Engineering, with a Quality Concentration,
                  University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, MN; Registered Professional Engineer (PE) in MN, WI; Society of Manufacturing Engineers Certified
Chandler, Mark
                  Manufacturing Engineer. This is my 2nd to last class in the PhD program before taking my prelims Jan/Feb 2008.
                                              Professional: Field Operations Engineer for U.S. DOT Federal Highway Administration, Wisconsin Division Office,
                  Madison, WI. Relatively recent resume: http://www.markrchandler.com/resume.doc and work history:
                  http://www.markrchandler.com/EmployHist.doc
                Personal: Living in Valparaiso Indiana, married with two children (wife Sherry is an assistant professor of education at Valparaiso University,
                oldest daughter Tami is a KC-135 pilot in the Air National Guard, youngest daughter Robyn is a Senior at Purdue University).
                                                    Educational: B.S. Aerospace Technology/Professional Flight, Indiana State University 1979; M.S. Human
DeMik, Randy
                Resource Development, Indiana State University 2002; PhD Technology Management (major area of specialization HRD and Industrial Training),
                Indiana State University expected graduation 2008.                                                             Professional: Boeing 737 Captain
                and Line Check Airman at United Airlines.



                Personal: Live in Cincinnati, Ohio. Married with two children - 19 yr. old daughter is a freshman at the University of Notre Dame, 15 yr. old son
                is a freshman in high school.                                                         Educational: B.S. Mechanical Engineering Technology -
DeVore, Mike    University of Cincinnati, MBA - University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Registered Professional Engineer (PE) in Ohio. This is my last class
                in the PhD program before taking my prelims this fall.                                                             Professional: MET Program
                Chair at Cincinnati State Technical & Community College




                Personal: Living in Chicago area with Fiance Michelle. Have 4 children (2 on her side and 2 on mine) ages 2yrs, 4yrs, 14yrs, 21yrs. Two
                grandchildren. Education: BS in Career and ORganizational Studies; Eastern Illinois University, MS in Technology Management focusing on
Felton, Jason
                Training and Development from Eastern Illinois University.                                                                          Professional:
                Director of a Corporate University. UGN U.



                More details about me individually at www.phipps.cc (links to my linkedin profile, etc). My undergrad is in Pol Sci / Comp Sci / Spanish from
                the University of Arizona. My MBA is from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. I have served in the Air Force as a communications officer for
                the past 6 years. Prior to the AF I worked as a research associate at the University of Arizona Artificial Intelligence center, as well as a Database
                Specialist at the Selenium and Cancer Prevention Clinical Trials (Univ of AZ). I have also been a bit entrepreneurial as well. I started
Phipps, Jared
                www.CarsOfTucson.com during my undergrad years, which was a spectacular failure (the one I am the most proud of!). Currently, I run Lassatt,
                and am looking at establishing a market Branding company (utlizing the Adify backbone). Within the Air Force, I have worked various projects,
                including my current assignment at Lackland AFB Texas, where I identify and integrate new technologies associated with Information
                Operations for the USAF as well as the DoD.
                   Live in Charlottesville, VA with spouse Todd and 2 yr old son Alex. I am the Assistant Director for End to End Operations at the National Radio
                   Astronomy Observatory headquarters here, where I am responsible for overseeing software development and service delivery at all four of our
Radzwill, Nicole   telescopes (one in NM, one in WV, one across the US and Caribbean, and one under construction in Chile). If you've ever seen the movie
                   "Contact", you've seen one of my offices. I have an undergraduate degree in meteorology, an MBA, and now in the PhD program with a
                   specialization in quality. I should be doing prelims late next spring or early in the summer, and finishing up at the end of 2008, yahoo!



                   Personal: Living in Warsaw, IN, married with three children. Wife, Robin is a tax professional and a Travel Agent. Daughter, Megan is a Sr. in
                   High School attending Purdue University next year. Twin sons Matt and Kyle are sophomores in high school.
                   Education: B.S., Indiana State University 1979, Printing Management; M.S., Rochester Institute of Technology 1980, Printing Technology;
Stamm, Scott
                   Certificate in Quality Mgmt, Indiana University, 1995, M.B.A., University of St. Francis, 1998. Indiana State University, PhD Technology
                   Management- Quality Systems Specialization- expected graduation 2011.
                   Professional: Quality Engineer for Zimmer, a medical device company.




                   Personal: Live in Downingtown, PA. My family consists of my wife, Eileen, and our two children. My daughter Avery, is 4 and my son Austin
                   is 20 months old. Education: B.S., Education, Lock Haven University, 1995; MBA, West Chester University, 2002; Indiana State University, PhD
Thomas, Mark W.
                   Technology Management - Digital Communications - expected graduation 2009. Professional: Database Specialist, Great Valley School District,
                   Malvern, PA




                   Personal: Living in Fort Wayne, IN, married with three children. Wife, Lisa works at home with our children. Son, Callan, is 4 years old. Twin
                   daughters, Reece and Emi, are 2 years old.                                   Education: B.A., Cedarville University, 1997, Management and
Wood, Evan         Marketing; M.B.A., Indiana University, 2004; Indiana State University, PhD Technology Management- HRD and Training Specialization-
                   expected graduation 2010.                                                                      Professional: Associate Dean, Strategic Planning
                   and Assistant Professor of Business, Taylor University
Return to 1.0
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Problem       The problem for this project is to move Chilco towards achieving its mission and goals by conducting a lean six sigma improvement project
Statement     focused on the Chilco organization's production and quality processes.

   Project Objective 1                  Project Objective 2                     Project Objective 3                     Project Objective 4                   Project Objective 5
To generate a electronic project                                           Chilco's current defect/rejection rate   To increase Chilco corporation
                                   To control existing variation in the                                                                                   To learn all eight tools and all
portfolio composed of all tools                                            is 51,000 PPM defective based on         revenue by 10%. This will occur by
                                   Chilco organization's production                                                                                       assigned applications, per the
completed, improved based on                                               2006 data. The goal is to improve the    applying the LSSQTT to make
                                   system, while increasing production                                                                                    syllabus, with each team member
instructor feedback, done in the                                           defect/rejection rate by 10% to          improvements throughout the
                                   by 20 percent based on application of                                                                                  gaining new knowledge and
context of the workbook                                                    45,000 PPM defective within one          organization to increase production
                                   lean six sigma principles and tools.                                                                                   experience.
applications provided.                                                     year.                                    and reduce scrap.


              Chilco is a simulated company that was developed by Dr. Childress from NCAT State University to use in his graduate coursework in
              Human Resource Development. The website for Chilco can be found at http://www.ncat.edu/%7Egillispc/chilcohomepage.html. The
              site provides company's specifics regarding Production Analysis, Accounting and Finance, Training and Development, and Payroll.

           Chilco strives to become a world leader in the production of injection molded products and related packaging services. The Chilco family
           employs 170 people worldwide in three facilities, including:
  Project  * Chilco Production Plant in Greensboro, North Carolina (100 employees)
Background * Chilco Packaging Plant in Clinton, Mississippi (50 employees)
           * Manchurian Machining in Bejing, China (20 employees)

              The Chilco family has aggressive goals to become one of the most competitive polymer products manufacturers. Our team will assist this
              goal by achieving the following through a series of projects:
              * To increase production by 20 percent.
              * To improve product quality through improved production processes.



   Return to 1.0
1.4 REVIEW OF LITERATURE - Tool 14
             ROL provides three types of content reviewed as literature sources for information to enhance the learning for pers
General      First, LSSQTT long form content is reviewed and abstracted according to sub-sections of the tool. Second, one or tw
Assistance 1 the short form (power point) content and abstract this in a similar format. Third, all provide an article, chapter, web
             source of external information which they research individually.
             ROL applications should be done with each.tool, routinely and then cumulatively allowed to build and grow withi
General      total packageto reflect all content and information which was learned and studied throughout the course. At the co
Assistance 2 and II it is intentionally designed to provide a collection of information focused on the topics studied and learned, s
             bibliographic listing is managed.




                                  LSSQTT Tool #14 Courseware Content
               “Political Correctness And Ethical Issues: Core Values, Civility And Ch

1.4.1 LSSQTT Content Reviewed, Abstracted
Abstract #,    Section of LSSQTT Reviewed (sub-title       Abstract of Information Reviewed (250-300 words, capturing the essen
Abstractor       of section in LSSQTT) or short form                     information reviewed in LSSQTT) in long and short form

                                                          There is an inherent moral and ethical dilemma associated with how te
                                                          used in society. Perhaps the technology will benefit some, but cause h
                                                          environment. This problem is realized when it is released to the public
                                                          capable of being directly controlled in its use. Technologists bear prim
                                                          for this problem, though educators must explain what technologies are
                                                          the proper uses of these technologies are. In the end, producers and us
                                                          technology must determine the control standards for technology. Dive
                                                          this area. People of all races, religions, and gender must share objectiv
                                                          of technologies. Many factors that impact these diverse areas will be c
Abstract 1,   LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #1. Cultural       “politically correct” approach would be to adapt the education and app
M. Carper     Diversity Introduced                        technology to fit this broadly diverse population. Technology is introd
                                                          workplace by professionals, including technologists, who must use car
                                                          Full participation in technology will place strains on resources
                                                          safety, and cost. Additionally, diversity in faith and religion add dram
                                                          – particularly in the medical field where life and death are confronted
                                                          dilemma is to what extent access to technology is given equally to all p
                                                          participation in technology can only be obtained when there is a full un
                                                          technology. These factors also influence hiring, firing, and advanceme
                                                          business contracts is also impacted by diversity concerns.
                                                     The topic of Selected Significant Diverse Groups focuses on the more sp
                                                     cultural diversity, and looks at one of the most significant issues related
                                                     race and ethnicity. It is suggested that the expansion of racial and ethnic
                                                     will continue to sustain the historical and traditional „melting pot‟. Whi
                                                     characteristics are seen as being opportunities for cultural expansion, th
                                                     of the possibility of conflicts resulting from the perceived differences. A
                                                     issue related to technology and diversity is sexual, and related to “diffe
                                                     sexual orientation and sexual habits”. A third significant area for divers
                                                     relate to individuals with handicaps and diseases. Of consequence to te
                                                     has been the law “Americans With Disabilities Act”, the ramifications o
                                                     continuing to be felt as those with disabilities
                                                     equal accessibility. A final and fourth focus of diversity involves religio
Abstract                                             interests‟.
         LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #2. Selected
2, M.
         Significant Diverse Groups                  The reviewer would also like to suggest that another general area needs
Chandler
                                                     LSSQTT Tool #14 "Political Correctness And Ethical Issues: Core Values
                                                     Change", and this is the impacts of technology related to crime and terr
                                                     have to look past any current newspaper or national news broadcast to
                                                     current compromise of technology by criminals or terrorists, from the u
                                                     destroy American skyscrapers to Purdue Pharma L.P., the maker of Oxy
                                                     being fined $634.5 for hiding the addictive aspects of the painkiller fro t
                                                     of 1) race and ethnicity, 2) sexual differences, 3) handicaps and diseases
                                                     special interests, and 5) crime and terrorism have both immediate and l
                                                     ramifications for technological organizations producing quality goods o




                                                      This section of the reading introduces eight possible obstacles to accessi
                                                     stuck in a rut; 2. time for existence only; 3. different priorities; 4.barely k
                                                     leadership role models; 6. separate but equal; 7. entitlements breed negle
                                                     institutional bias/predisposition. It is argued that technologists must re
              LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #3.           barriers in organizations, communities, and by individuals who remain
Abstract 3,
              Technology, diversity, tradition and   and mores of the day must be removed and opportunity afforded to per
R. Demik
              obstacles to change                    to have access to facilitation and change. Full technological participation
                                                     through providing resources for all members of society. Diverse groups
                                                     require time, freedom, and ability for full participation. Full participatio
                                                     technology will allow for facilitation and change.
                                                         The term political correctness implies doing what is most appropriate fo
                                                         people. This is tied to the idea that politicians must try to keep enough
                                                         their performance that they can get re
                                                         what is right – just what is popular with most of their constituents. The
                                                         is good for the majority many not be what is best for everyone in society
                                                         Arguably the U.S. government plays an important role in dealing with i
                                                         but unfortunately if we are always trying to “shoot for the middle of the
                                                         nothing for those outside the mainstream of society. If nothing else, th
                                                         function is to “bring diverse views together into a cohesive voice for un
                                                         Our national leaders can help this country to allow different cultures to
Abstract 4      LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #4. Political   marketplace that exists today.
M. DeVore       correctness                              The way that our government manages issues and the way that the priv
                                                         decisions have both changed in recent years. More and more organizati
                                                         „consensus‟ approach to manage their organizations. This shift from dic
                                                         to a more democratic system continues to evolve and challenge compan
                                                         the strengths of a team based organization is its diversity. The collectiv
                                                         group can tackle many challenges if everyone is allowed to participate.
                                                         a responsibility to be good corporate citizens. Even though this present
                                                         most U.S. companies have made sincere efforts to develop policies that
                                                         ethically correct for everyone.




                                                         “Moral and ethical issues formulate some of the most important and dif
                                                         thought for technologists, and for the technological culture as a whole”.
                                                         responsible and effective relative to moral and ethical expectations with
                                                         the organization must clearly formulate policy statements around impo
                                                         consideration. Additionally, organizations must have provisions for pr
                                                         to values and virtues embodied in moral and ethical policies in order to
                                                         application of these policies and/or interpretation in cases where they a
                                                         effective technological organization should provide these policies and p
                                                         and ethical considerations such as discipline, compassion, responsibiliti
                                                         friendships, work expectations, courage, honesty, perseverance, loyalty
                                                         Additionally, the technological organization must address implications
                                                         and ethical relationships to technological aspects of its services/produc
Abtract 5, J.   LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #5. Moral and   are the issues surrounding technology and religion wherein at least one
Travis Felton   Ethical Issues                           stake no matter the decision made by the organization. This is especiall
                                                         we consider:
                                                         1. Traditionally, lives were oriented around the church.
                                                         2. Today, life revolves around work, catching up, and control.
                                                         3. Newer generations focus more on technological advancements that sp
                                                         4. Health is nearly fully dependant on technology.
                                                         5. Values stem from individuality relative to how plugged in one may b
                                                         6. Today, individuals typically watch out for themselves.
                                                         With all of these considerations, it is critical that codes of conduct and c
                                                         addressed because there are as many moral and ethical possibilities as t
                                                         technological organization of today.
                                                          Ultimately, the products developed and manufactured though the tech
                                                          utilized by consumers, or by companies which serve the consumers. Th
                                                          the same individuals who vote for and support the government. The te
                                                          the same process which provides for free government also affects how o
                                                          producers of technology; consumers demand quality, affordable produ
                                                          is not a bystander in the economic process
                                                          enforce appropriate use of technology as well as consumer rights) do af
                                                          Individuals can replace their elected representatives if they do not feel t
                                                          represented correctly, thus large public outrage over corporate acts (suc
                                                          scandal) can directly impact government leaders. Additionally, consum
                                                          economically – select which product they will purchase
                                                          provides an economic control, based upon the tenants of trade and regu
                                                          government. Both government and economic controls are effective en
Abstract 6, J.   LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #6. Political   are generally considered to be a slow, plodding process. A third alterna
Phipps           Issues and Control Of Technology         individual control. How individuals use technology; demonstrating eff
                                                          taking the time to educate themselves properly regarding safe and effec
                                                          accepting their commitments through the use of technology, can in man
                                                          the fate of technology itself. The text raises the ethical question of what
                                                          good “technical” citizens – again, an issue revolving around the approp
                                                          technology. Many new technical advents are very much controversial
                                                          being a prime example – and are evaluated and debated by technical cit
                                                          before government intervention begins. In all, a comprehensive review
                                                          impact it has on society and how government will respond to it, all com
                                                          companies who develop the technology. Mature, responsible companie
                                                          impact and ethical implications of technology above profits.




                                                          The role of the technologist is explained as one that focuses on people, e
                                                          resources, and bridges the gaps between humans and their interaction w
                                                          designed environments. It is stated that "it is only a matter of time befor
                                                          accountable for not being good stewards of our resources." This is consi
Abstract 7       LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #7. The         analysis today that claims the next limiting factor for corporate product
N. Radziwill     technologist's responsibility            will be in the natural resources that are employed. The purpose of man
                                                          decisions at the interface of humans and technology is to achieve lasting
                                                          competitiveness.
                                                      All technology has a fundamental moral and ethical dilemma, that bein
                                                      will be used and to what end. This dilemma is oftentimes the single gre
                                                      against believing we will ever be in total control of the technology we c
                                                      the production floor and is turned over to the owner it is out of our imm
                                                      rely on educators to explain technology and the potential impacts and c
                                                      use. Still it is incumbent on the producers and users of technology to co
                                                      the use of technology. Choices and decisions we make must resolve and
                                                      general relates to diversity in people and technologies. If we are to arriv
                                                      persons must share a similar vision for the future of the technological c
                                                      politically correct approach is to "level the playing field" with education
Abstract                                              sense and gain a shared vision for the technological future, regardless o
              LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #1. Cultural
1, S.                                                 may be. Worldwide people are beginning to demand the fruits of techn
              Diversity Introduced
Stamm                                                 participation in its use. It will be difficult to allow full participation in te
                                                      at a reasonable cost. Part of the dilemma is also how to provide the tech
                                                      associated training across the traditions of different cultures and still en
                                                      participation. In some cultures females and persons of differing races an
                                                      not allowed full participation in education. Coupled with this is bringin
                                                      experienced persons. Persons with technological knowledge in leadersh
                                                      called upon to manage situations and evolve a balance to ensure techno
                                                      are fairly administered.




                                                      Ideally, every person would be treated equal within an organization. In
                                                      is different in their own way. Diversity issues related to race, gender, a
                                                      orientation, or culture impact the organization.
                                                       One of the primary issues within diversity is the differences between ra
                                                      groups. Racial and ethnic differences have historically been the focus o
                                                      within the American society. It is important to keep in mind that the di
                                                      race, ethnicity, and culture create opportunities for organizations to gro
                                                      distinct perspectives.
                                                       Diversity in terms of gender, sexual orientation, and personal sexual co
Abstract 2,   LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #2. Selected   into organization culture. Gender relates to differences between male a
M. Thomas     Significant Diverse Groups              orientation refers to heterosexual and homosexual, while sexual conduc
                                                      behavior. Each of these differences affects treatment within the workpl
                                                       Diversity issues also include differences in religious beliefs, handicaps,
                                                      personal beliefs. Organizations must be prepared to manage diversity i
                                                      problems. Organizations must make decisions to attempt to assure equ
                                                      acceptance. Above all, organizations must keep in mind that diversity c
                                                      and productivity. Organizations prepared to manage diversity will be b
                                                      seizing opportunities and eliminating threats related to diverse groups.



                                                      In order to get the full benefits of diversity in organizations and society,
                                                          In order to get the full benefits of diversity in organizations and society,
                                                          understand the factors related to diversity in the technological culture. M
                                                          barriers to accessing technological tools must be removed. Obstacles to
                                                          tools may be:

                                                          1. Stuck in a rut.
                                                          2. Time for existence only.
                                                          3. Different priorities.
                                                          4. Barely know tools exist.
                                                          5. Leadership role models.
              LSSQTT Tool #14, Section #3.                6. Separate but equal.
Abstract 3,
              Technology, diversity, tradition and        7. Entitlements breed neglect.
E. Wood
              obstacles to change                         8. Institutional bias/predisposition.

                                                          All individuals from all backgrounds and people groups need to gain ac
                                                          experience that can lead to facilitation and change. Failure to help perso
                                                          backgrounds conform to the technological functions in a productive ma
                                                          many of those persons to conform to less productive mores and values.
                                                          groups are the same in that they require time, freedom and the ability fo
                                                          It is important that we begin planning to assist all people, especially min
                                                          proactively.




1.4.2 LSSQTT Articles Abstracted

Abstract #,   Bibliographic Information (author, title,      Abstract of Information Reviewed (250-300 words, capturing the ess
Abstractor           source, year of publication)                           chapter, website, or other source of information review

                                                           This article looks at economic development of cities through cultural ind
                                                           effectively, urban regeneration through culture. Culture plays a key rol
                                                           Such cities have become known as “creative cities”. Industries such as
                                                           and related festivals transform the cities and encourage innovation in s
                                                           the creative field. The “Huddersfield Creative Town Initiative” in Englan
                                                           In this case, a city that was devastated by the Great Britain’s restructur
              Creative Cities - promoting social and       industries was able to move these unemployed and unskilled workers t
              economic development through cultural        technology and media. Public and private participation is necessary fo
              industries                                   leaders are taking inventory of their cultural assets
Abstract 1,                                                to be successful, the city must attract the diversity of culture that can g
M. Carper     http://portal.unesco.org/culture/en/ev.      innovation, and generate economic growth. These cities base their ap
                                                           T’s” – technology, talent, and tolerance. Diversity plays a role in each
              php-
                                                           Though there are some exceptions
              URL_ID=23947&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&                significant opportunity. This creativity will be, in large part, fueled by di
              URL_SECTION=201.html                         these cities focus so directly on diversity. Creative industries contribute
                                                           city’s fundamental culture. This brings cultural diversity, local charm, a
                                                           overall quality of live. Many tourism industries have begun moving awa
                                                           marketing to travel customized to fit the unique cultural heritage of the
                                                          The author points to a very contemporary issue with diversity, suggest
                                                          title implies, when there is a conflict involving ethics, technology and d
                                                          to both promote - and find – the creation of an illusion of diversity. Thi
                                                          be a minor topic in the overall presentation found in LSSQTT Tool #14
                                                          And Ethical Issues: Core Values, Civility And Change”. However, it is
                                                          technologist would be interested in, particularly as the illusion of diver
                                                          information and communication deceptions, which once uncovered are
                                                          about news. I was aware of one example which occurred in the town I w
            Conklin, W. (2001). The illusion of           University of Wisconsin (Madison) altered a photograph in the underg
            diversity: When ethics, technology and        to include a black student in what was an all
Abstract 2,                                               a list of similar bad decisions by a wide range of organizations attempti
            diversity clash. Diversity Factor, 9(2), 5-
M. Chandler
            10. Retrieved July 22, 2007, from             convince others outside the organization
            ProQuest database.                            suggests that in the late 1990s attracting and retaining a diverse workfo
                                                          many leading organizations, leading to organizational pressure to dem
                                                          Consequently “this struggle between genuine diversity objectives and p
                                                          cause decision makers to stretch the truth, even to lie”. Businesses that
                                                          photo stock houses – can actually have a category called diversity, and
                                                          for purchase and reuse. This leads to a supply chain of images, with ide
                                                          authenticity associated with manufactured images.




                                                          In this article, the author identifies the need to actively involve people o
                                                          and cultural backgrounds in computer technology in order to sustain A
                                                          competitiveness. One of the problems identified in this article relating
                                                          technology for all diverse groups of society are the absence of compute
                                                          minority school districts throughout the U.S. The article introduces a s
                                                          widespread inequities and the uneven distribution of computer and tec
                                                          This study revealed that computers are available to 25% of the poorest
                                                          ratio of 1 per 8 students...in contrast, 25% of the most affluent school di
              Stevenson, J., Moll, J. K.. (1992). The     1 computer per 4 students. The author argues that the computing field
Abstract 3,   challenge of the 21st century: Linking      culturally diverse teaching faculty to mentor and teach our culturally d
R. Demik      computer technology and cultural            our computer-dependent society. In order for this to occur, technologic
              literacy. Transformations, 3(1), 9.         must be examined to integrate courseware with a multicultural focus ac
                                                          The author concludes that technological competencies amplify the need
                                                          teach in classrooms as a microcosm of the new diverse workplace. Any
                                                          application skills learned in classrooms can undoubtedly be transforme
                                                          workplace. To achieve these competencies, educational leaders and em
                                                          develop a clear vision of the future and strategically pursue this vision
                                                          perseverance, integrity and commitment.
                                                         Diversity in the workplace has gradually improved in terms of compos
                                                         and the today‟s workplace is more diverse than ever. This appears to b
                                                         continue into the future. There are many reasons for organizations to d
                                                         their employees but the authors claims the primary motivation is profit
                                                         that organizations are diversifying because it is beneficial for the organ
                                                         because it is the right thing to do. Most business‟s “bottom line mental
                                                         need to do what it takes to make a profit and not necessarily what is so
                                                         just. The authors suggest that organizations should concentrate more e
                                                         just workplace for all employees regardless of the costs.
             O‟Leary, B.J., Weathington, B. L. (2006).   The reality of the business world today is that the workforce around th
             Beyond the Business Case for Diversity      more diverse. In the U.S. alone the changes have been dramatic in the la
Abtract 4,
             in Organizations. Employee                  52% of the workforce was made up of white males, by 1998 this had dro
M. DeVore
             Responsibilities and Rights Journal,        1988 to 1998, 68% of new workers were women and minorities. Compa
             Volume 18, issue 4. p. 1-10.                occurring in many European and South American countries.
                                                         There is an increase in team work in industry today and diversity has b
                                                         an affect on team performance. The advantages to a diverse team inclu
                                                         greater creativity and increased innovation. Unfortunately, studies sho
                                                         increase interpersonal conflicts, reduce commitment, and reduce interp
                                                         communication among work teams. Most organizations attempt to no
                                                         diverse work force, but also to manage diversity within their company
                                                         and fair.
                                                          Ethical issues related to technology and for all intents and purposes, sci
                                                          on the following: Medicine, Military, and Economics (McGinn, 143). W
                                                          primary categories of ethical debate, there are several fundamental argu
                                                          against technological advance. When discussing medicine, the primary
                                                          about Biotechnology or more specifically; cloning, gene therapy, and th
                                                          species for enhanced production. Then again, the medical field has to d
                                                          its own ethical antagonists where confronted with transplants, life exten
                                                          (technology), and the very popular fertility opportunities. In the militar
                                                          debates focus on weapons of mass destruction, nuclear testing, and the
                                                          controversial utilization of human subjects in military experimentation.
                                                          category yields considerable debate in the area of pollution for profit, te
                                                          monopolies, advanced advertising, and buying influence. All of these d
                                                          driven by the advancement of the technological society of today. When
                McGinn, Robert E., Science, Technology,
Abtract 5, J.                                             fundamental impact of any given controversial subject with regard to te
                and Society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice
Travis Felton                                             advancement in today‟s society, “A more comprehensive and sensitive
                Hall, 1991                                analysis is now required, one more adequate to the complexity and con
                                                          contemporary scientific and technological processes and products” (Mc
                                                              So then how do we perform an informed, comprehensive, and sensit
                                                          analysis of the continuing advancement in technology? McGinn submit
                                                          considerations that must be made in order to provide clarification of eth
                                                          conflicts (144). The first is determining all the facts and their underlying
                                                          second deals with defining all of the affected parties or entities. The thi
                                                          stating and understanding the foundation on which the ethical conflict
                                                          concepts, criteria, and principles in question. And the last focuses on th
                                                          making theories and arguments that have been used for many, many ye




                                                          During the past decades (in fact, the past several centuries), there has b
                                                          advancement of technology. Among the most crucial is the relatively ne
                                                          information technology, “which include electronic messaging systems,
                                                          information systems, collaborative systems, group decision support sys
                                                          technologies that use sophisticated information management to enable
                                                          participation in organization activities”. Utilization of these technologie
                                                          in which society functions (to the class I will point out YouTube as the m
               Gerardine DeSanctis, Marshall Scott
                                                          authors of this article “propose adaptive structuration theory (AST) as a
               Poole. “Capturing the Complexity in
                                                          studying the role of advanced information technologies in organization
Abstract 6, J. Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive          AST examines the change process from two angles: “(1) the types of stru
Phipps         Structuration Theory”. Organization        provided by advanced technologies, and (2) the structures that actually
               Science, Vol. 5, No. 2 (May, 1994), pp.    action as people interact with these technologies”. The goal is that by ca
               121-147                                    processes which are developed by the implementation of new technolo
                                                          impacts these process have, society can better understand the complexi
                                                          organization relationships”. With a better understanding of such relatio
                                                          better be able to understand how to implement technology (especially i
                                                          technology initiatives which can be culturally revolutionary) in an appr
                                                     Schon originally conceptualized the design process as "reflection in acti
                                                     Reflective Practitioner in 1983. This address describes teaching and trai
                                                     design, that benefit from the practice of reflection in action: "It involves
                                                     response to surprise by thought turning back on itself, thinking what w
             Schon, D.A. (1987). Educating the       it, setting the problem of the situation anew, conducting an action expe
             reflective practitioner. Address to the which we seek to solve the new problems we‟ve set, an experiment in w
             1987 meeting of the American            our new way of seeing the situation, and also try to change that situatio
Abstract 7   Educational Research Association,       likens jazz improvisation and good conversations to the same dynamic
N. Radziwill Washington DC. Retrieved on July 20,    in action to scientific practice as a complement: you have to be able to s
             2007 from                               artistic or creative activity) to be able to apply rules and theory (scientif
             http://educ.queensu.ca/~russellt/howte lesson in this is that the two practices, scientific discourse and reasonin
             ach/schon87.htm.                        reflection in action, provide a basis for effective communication particu
                                                     domains. This cross-disciplinary integration, particularly as it relates to
                                                     technology in specific contexts of use, is the domain of the technologist.



                                                        According to recent projections by the US Census Bureau by 2050 there
                                                        racial or ethnic group in the United States. America stands on the thresh
                                                        technological change and changes in cultural diversity. The classrooms
                                                        the future will be filled with more women, ethic minorities, immigrants
                                                        As the US migrates to service economy there will be a greater need to u
                                                        appreciate the interactions of these various groups
                                                        Educators need to help prepare students to understand these various cu
                                                        has also accelerated the interactions of various subcultures and groups
                                                        mail, text messaging, the internet, cell phones and the like. Advancing t
              "Diversity, Technology and Change:        almost instantaneous communication between people and between gro
              Challenges for the 21 Century"            scattered throughout the world. It even serves to bring live broadcasts o
Abstract 8,
                                                        events right into our own living rooms. Complicating the process is the
S. Stamm      http://hr.unlv.edu/Diversity/technolog
                                                        technological advancement. All of these factors will combine to create a
              y.html
                                                        and stress in the classroom and the workplace. A tight labor market ma
                                                        more inevitable that all of America will be studying and working beside
                                                        been traditionally left out of the labor force. In order to understand the
                                                        diversity we need to be aware that the world economies are interconnec
                                                        accelerated advances in technology. Diversity is one of the pivotal issue
                                                        of racism and sexism do not affect just one group. They affect everyone.
                                                        growth and everybody wins.
                                                        As organizations have become more diverse, there has been increasing
                                                        opportunity and the reality of diversity with respect to team process an
                                                        optimistic view explains that diversity will lead to an increase in the va
                                                        and approaches. It can lead to opportunities for knowledge sharing an
                                                        collaborative creativity and quality. The existing evidence points to a m
                                                        view. The pessimistic viewpoint explains that diversity creates divisio
                                                        divisions turn into negative performance outcomes for the group. To f
               Mannix, E., Neale, M. (2005). What       impact of diversity, one must understand a variety of factors, including
Abtract 9,     Differences Make a Difference?.          defined and categorized. It is also necessary to explore the linkage betw
M. Thomas      Psychological Science in the Public      processes, and performance.
               Interest. Oxford: Oct 2005. Vol. 6, 2.    Various categorization schemes based on diverse factors have been us
                                                        definition of diversity in teams. Using factors to shape the definition o
                                                        researchers to examine multiple types of diversity and the interactions
                                                        ignores the sizes of subgroups. Another method is to use a proportion
                                                        Proportional approaches allow the consideration of group size, but ten
                                                        one type of diversity. Therefore, proportional approaches can overesti
                                                        relative to other types.



                                                        Education and cross-cultural training helps foster an understanding of
                                                        a necessity to build diversity. For instance, the translation of one langu
                                                        requires that one understand the concept and implication of the words
                                                        and not just the words. Organizations that actively build diversity can
                                                        shortages. Diversity will also improve customer service.

               Simpson, R. (2004, August). Measuring    Continuous refinement of recruiting and retention strategies is require
Abstract 10,   change: How technology increases         truly committed to diversity. Metrics are a key component of refining r
E. Wood        nursing's diversity. Nursing             retention. Many large employers use diversity scorecards to analyze di
               Management, 35(8), 12-13.                recruiting and retention performance. Tracking diversity data well requ
                                                        However, only a few “out-of-box” solutions exist. Specific areas of mea
                                                        initiatives include:
                                                          Identifying candidates.
                                                          Reducing turnover.
                                                          Evaluating inclusiveness.
ources for information to enhance the learning for person's on the team.
 according to sub-sections of the tool. Second, one or two on the team review
milar format. Third, all provide an article, chapter, website or other related
ally.
nd then cumulatively allowed to build and grow within the portfolio as a
s learned and studied throughout the course. At the conclusion of phases I
nformation focused on the topics studied and learned, similar to how any




 Courseware Content
sues: Core Values, Civility And Change"


 rmation Reviewed (250-300 words, capturing the essence of the section of
 formation reviewed in LSSQTT) in long and short form tools

 ent moral and ethical dilemma associated with how technology will be
 Perhaps the technology will benefit some, but cause harm to others or the
his problem is realized when it is released to the public and is no longer
  directly controlled in its use. Technologists bear primary responsibility
   though educators must explain what technologies are available and what
of these technologies are. In the end, producers and users of the
   determine the control standards for technology. Diversity plays a role in
e of all races, religions, and gender must share objectives about the control
  Many factors that impact these diverse areas will be considered. A
ect” approach would be to adapt the education and application of
  this broadly diverse population. Technology is introduced into the
 ofessionals, including technologists, who must use care and sensitivity.
n in technology will place strains on resources – a balance of technology,
  Additionally, diversity in faith and religion add dramatic considerations
 the medical field where life and death are confronted regularly. Another
hat extent access to technology is given equally to all people. Full
 echnology can only be obtained when there is a full understanding of
 se factors also influence hiring, firing, and advancement. Awarding
 ts is also impacted by diversity concerns.
 ted Significant Diverse Groups focuses on the more specific aspects of
 , and looks at one of the most significant issues related to diversity, that of
y. It is suggested that the expansion of racial and ethnic groups in America
 ustain the historical and traditional „melting pot‟. While the different
e seen as being opportunities for cultural expansion, there is the awareness
 of conflicts resulting from the perceived differences. Another significant
 chnology and diversity is sexual, and related to “differences in gender,
n and sexual habits”. A third significant area for diversity considerations
 als with handicaps and diseases. Of consequence to technology in America
 “Americans With Disabilities Act”, the ramifications of which are
  elt as those with disabilities – and their advocates – push for a range of
y. A final and fourth focus of diversity involves religious and other „special


uld also like to suggest that another general area needs to be examined the
  "Political Correctness And Ethical Issues: Core Values, Civility And
s is the impacts of technology related to crime and terrorism. One does not
 any current newspaper or national news broadcast to learn of the most
 ise of technology by criminals or terrorists, from the use of jet planes to
n skyscrapers to Purdue Pharma L.P., the maker of OxyContain, executives
5 for hiding the addictive aspects of the painkiller fro the public. The issues
nicity, 2) sexual differences, 3) handicaps and diseases, 4) religious and
and 5) crime and terrorism have both immediate and long-term
technological organizations producing quality goods or services.




e reading introduces eight possible obstacles to accessing technology as: 1.
 me for existence only; 3. different priorities; 4.barely know tools exist; 5.
odels; 6. separate but equal; 7. entitlements breed neglect; and 8.
 predisposition. It is argued that technologists must recognize traditional
zations, communities, and by individuals who remain locked in to norms
day must be removed and opportunity afforded to persons from all groups
 acilitation and change. Full technological participation will only come
g resources for all members of society. Diverse groups within our culture
dom, and ability for full participation. Full participation and access to
 low for facilitation and change.
   correctness implies doing what is most appropriate for the majority of the
ed to the idea that politicians must try to keep enough people satisfied with
e that they can get re-elected. This does not necessarily mean that they do
  t what is popular with most of their constituents. The reality is that what
ajority many not be what is best for everyone in society.
 . government plays an important role in dealing with issues of diversity,
   if we are always trying to “shoot for the middle of the road” this does
  outside the mainstream of society. If nothing else, the government‟s
 ng diverse views together into a cohesive voice for unity and strength”.
 ers can help this country to allow different cultures to unite in the global
 exists today.
  government manages issues and the way that the private sector makes
  th changed in recent years. More and more organizations use the
oach to manage their organizations. This shift from dictatorial leadership
 atic system continues to evolve and challenge company leaders. One of
  team based organization is its diversity. The collective energy of a diverse
many challenges if everyone is allowed to participate. Organizations have
o be good corporate citizens. Even though this presents quite a challenge,
nies have made sincere efforts to develop policies that are morally and
or everyone.




al issues formulate some of the most important and difficult areas of
 ologists, and for the technological culture as a whole”. In order to be
 ffective relative to moral and ethical expectations within an organization
must clearly formulate policy statements around important areas of
dditionally, organizations must have provisions for providing orientation
 ues embodied in moral and ethical policies in order to ensure successful
 se policies and/or interpretation in cases where they are not followed. The
 gical organization should provide these policies and procedures for moral
derations such as discipline, compassion, responsibilities and authorities,
k expectations, courage, honesty, perseverance, loyalty, and faith.
  technological organization must address implications surrounding moral
onships to technological aspects of its services/products. In this same realm
 rounding technology and religion wherein at least one point of interest is at
he decision made by the organization. This is especially important when

ives were oriented around the church.
olves around work, catching up, and control.
ions focus more on technological advancements that spiritual health.
y fully dependant on technology.
om individuality relative to how plugged in one may be.
uals typically watch out for themselves.
considerations, it is critical that codes of conduct and conflicts of interest
 e there are as many moral and ethical possibilities as there are people in the
anization of today.
roducts developed and manufactured though the technical process are
 mers, or by companies which serve the consumers. These consumers are
uals who vote for and support the government. The text here argues that
  which provides for free government also affects how our society regulates
 nology; consumers demand quality, affordable products. The government
r in the economic process – governmental controls (generally aimed to
ate use of technology as well as consumer rights) do affect industry.
 eplace their elected representatives if they do not feel they have been
ectly, thus large public outrage over corporate acts (such as the Enron
ctly impact government leaders. Additionally, consumers can “vote”
elect which product they will purchase – in our free-market society. This
 omic control, based upon the tenants of trade and regulated by the
h government and economic controls are effective en-masse, however they
 sidered to be a slow, plodding process. A third alternative for change is the
 l. How individuals use technology; demonstrating effective ethical use,
o educate themselves properly regarding safe and effective use, and
ommitments through the use of technology, can in many ways determine
 logy itself. The text raises the ethical question of what comprises being a
            again, an issue revolving around the appropriate use of
y new technical advents are very much controversial – stem cell research
          and are evaluated and debated by technical citizens at many levels
nt intervention begins. In all, a comprehensive review of technology, the
 ociety and how government will respond to it, all comes full-circle to the
develop the technology. Mature, responsible companies will consider the
al implications of technology above profits.




chnologist is explained as one that focuses on people, environment and
idges the gaps between humans and their interaction with the natural and
 ments. It is stated that "it is only a matter of time before we will be held
ot being good stewards of our resources." This is consistent with new
at claims the next limiting factor for corporate productivity improvement
ural resources that are employed. The purpose of managing and making
nterface of humans and technology is to achieve lasting, sustainable
as a fundamental moral and ethical dilemma, that being the issue of how it
 to what end. This dilemma is oftentimes the single greatest argument
  we will ever be in total control of the technology we create. Once it is left
oor and is turned over to the owner it is out of our immediate control. We
   to explain technology and the potential impacts and circumstances of its
  mbent on the producers and users of technology to control as best we can
 logy. Choices and decisions we make must resolve and how we act and in
  diversity in people and technologies. If we are to arrive at shared goals, all
  re a similar vision for the future of the technological culture. The only
   approach is to "level the playing field" with education in the broadest
 shared vision for the technological future, regardless of how diverse we
  de people are beginning to demand the fruits of technology and full
  s use. It will be difficult to allow full participation in technology safely and
ost. Part of the dilemma is also how to provide the technology and
ng across the traditions of different cultures and still encourage full
some cultures females and persons of differing races and ethnic groups are
participation in education. Coupled with this is bringing technology to non
 ons. Persons with technological knowledge in leadership positions will be
anage situations and evolve a balance to ensure technology and education




 son would be treated equal within an organization. In reality, each person
ir own way. Diversity issues related to race, gender, age, religion, sexual
lture impact the organization.
 ry issues within diversity is the differences between race and ethnic
nd ethnic differences have historically been the focus of diversity issues
 can society. It is important to keep in mind that the differences between
 d culture create opportunities for organizations to grow through multiple

 s of gender, sexual orientation, and personal sexual conduct also factor
 culture. Gender relates to differences between male and female. Sexual
 to heterosexual and homosexual, while sexual conduct refers to habits and
f these differences affects treatment within the workplace.
also include differences in religious beliefs, handicaps, diseases, and
Organizations must be prepared to manage diversity issues and related
 izations must make decisions to attempt to assure equality and promote
ve all, organizations must keep in mind that diversity can impact quality
  Organizations prepared to manage diversity will be better skilled at
ities and eliminating threats related to diverse groups.



e full benefits of diversity in organizations and society, we must better
e full benefits of diversity in organizations and society, we must better
 ctors related to diversity in the technological culture. Most importantly,
 ng technological tools must be removed. Obstacles to access technological




 eed neglect.
as/predisposition.

om all backgrounds and people groups need to gain access in order to get
an lead to facilitation and change. Failure to help persons from diverse
form to the technological functions in a productive manner will result in
rsons to conform to less productive mores and values. Diverse people
me in that they require time, freedom and the ability for full participation.
at we begin planning to assist all people, especially minority groups,




formation Reviewed (250-300 words, capturing the essence of the article,
 chapter, website, or other source of information reviewed)

s at economic development of cities through cultural industries –
n regeneration through culture. Culture plays a key role in urban renewal.
  become known as “creative cities”. Industries such as television, theater,
vals transform the cities and encourage innovation in small businesses in
 . The “Huddersfield Creative Town Initiative” in England is and example.
ty that was devastated by the Great Britain’s restructuring of heavy
ble to move these unemployed and unskilled workers to positions in
media. Public and private participation is necessary for success. Town
 g inventory of their cultural assets – both tangible and intangible. In order
, the city must attract the diversity of culture that can generate creativity,
generate economic growth. These cities base their approach on the “three
y, talent, and tolerance. Diversity plays a role in each of these areas.
e some exceptions – such as Silicon Valley – creativity remains as a
 tunity. This creativity will be, in large part, fueled by diversity. This is why
s so directly on diversity. Creative industries contribute to and support the
 al culture. This brings cultural diversity, local charm, and improves the
  live. Many tourism industries have begun moving away from mass
vel customized to fit the unique cultural heritage of the traveler.
s to a very contemporary issue with diversity, suggesting that as the article
 n there is a conflict involving ethics, technology and diversity, it is possible
            – the creation of an illusion of diversity. This would potentially
in the overall presentation found in LSSQTT Tool #14 "Political Correctness
es: Core Values, Civility And Change”. However, it is one that a
 ld be interested in, particularly as the illusion of diversity referred to are
 communication deceptions, which once uncovered are repackaged as news
 s aware of one example which occurred in the town I work in, where the
sconsin (Madison) altered a photograph in the undergrad admissions book,
k student in what was an all-white group of students. The author provides
ad decisions by a wide range of organizations attempting to look – and
outside the organization – that diversity has been achieved. The author
 he late 1990s attracting and retaining a diverse workforce was adopted by
ganizations, leading to organizational pressure to demonstrate diversity.
his struggle between genuine diversity objectives and public image can
 akers to stretch the truth, even to lie”. Businesses that provide graphics –
      can actually have a category called diversity, and images are available
  reuse. This leads to a supply chain of images, with identified issues of
ciated with manufactured images.




   author identifies the need to actively involve people of all racial, ethnic,
kgrounds in computer technology in order to sustain America's global
   One of the problems identified in this article relating to access to
 l diverse groups of society are the absence of computers in predominately
districts throughout the U.S. The article introduces a study that refers to
uities and the uneven distribution of computer and technological resources.
  ed that computers are available to 25% of the poorest school districts on a
udents...in contrast, 25% of the most affluent school districts have a ratio of
  students. The author argues that the computing field clearly needs a more
e teaching faculty to mentor and teach our culturally diverse workforce in
 pendent society. In order for this to occur, technological ways and means
 d to integrate courseware with a multicultural focus across the curriculum.
 udes that technological competencies amplify the need for educators to
ms as a microcosm of the new diverse workplace. Any computer
  learned in classrooms can undoubtedly be transformed to tomorrow's
 hieve these competencies, educational leaders and employers must
 ision of the future and strategically pursue this vision with persistence,
 egrity and commitment.
workplace has gradually improved in terms of composition and numbers
workplace is more diverse than ever. This appears to be a trend that will
   future. There are many reasons for organizations to diversify the ranks of
 but the authors claims the primary motivation is profit. Their concern is
  s are diversifying because it is beneficial for the organization and not
  ight thing to do. Most business‟s “bottom line mentality” is driven by their
 it takes to make a profit and not necessarily what is socially responsible or
   suggest that organizations should concentrate more efforts on creating a
  r all employees regardless of the costs.
   business world today is that the workforce around the world is becoming
 the U.S. alone the changes have been dramatic in the last 30 years. In 1978
 orce was made up of white males, by 1998 this had dropped to 40%. From
% of new workers were women and minorities. Comparable movements are
  y European and South American countries.
ase in team work in industry today and diversity has been shown to have
   performance. The advantages to a diverse team include the potential for
   and increased innovation. Unfortunately, studies show that diversity can
 sonal conflicts, reduce commitment, and reduce interpersonal
among work teams. Most organizations attempt to not only create a
 ce, but also to manage diversity within their company so that it is affective
ated to technology and for all intents and purposes, science, usually focus
 Medicine, Military, and Economics (McGinn, 143). Within each of these
es of ethical debate, there are several fundamental arguments for and
 ical advance. When discussing medicine, the primary debate might be
ogy or more specifically; cloning, gene therapy, and the altering of a
 ced production. Then again, the medical field has to deal specifically with
 tagonists where confronted with transplants, life extending machinery
  the very popular fertility opportunities. In the military category the
 weapons of mass destruction, nuclear testing, and the extremely
ization of human subjects in military experimentation. The economic
onsiderable debate in the area of pollution for profit, technological
anced advertising, and buying influence. All of these debates are partially
vancement of the technological society of today. When confronted with the
 act of any given controversial subject with regard to technological
 oday‟s society, “A more comprehensive and sensitive kind of ethical
equired, one more adequate to the complexity and consequences of
 entific and technological processes and products” (McGinn, 143-144).
 o we perform an informed, comprehensive, and sensitive kind of ethical
 ntinuing advancement in technology? McGinn submits that there are four
 at must be made in order to provide clarification of ethical issues and
he first is determining all the facts and their underlying validity. The
h defining all of the affected parties or entities. The third has to do with
rstanding the foundation on which the ethical conflict exists based on
  and principles in question. And the last focuses on the distinct decision-
and arguments that have been used for many, many years.




decades (in fact, the past several centuries), there has been dramatic
 echnology. Among the most crucial is the relatively new field of
nology, “which include electronic messaging systems, executive
  ms, collaborative systems, group decision support systems, and other
  use sophisticated information management to enable multiparty
 rganization activities”. Utilization of these technologies change the manner
functions (to the class I will point out YouTube as the most recent). The
 ticle “propose adaptive structuration theory (AST) as a viable approach for
  of advanced information technologies in organization change”. In short,
e change process from two angles: “(1) the types of structures that are
anced technologies, and (2) the structures that actually emerge in human
 nteract with these technologies”. The goal is that by capturing the
are developed by the implementation of new technology, and tracing the
ocess have, society can better understand the complexity of “technology-
 tionships”. With a better understanding of such relationships, we will
understand how to implement technology (especially information
tives which can be culturally revolutionary) in an appropriate manner.
conceptualized the design process as "reflection in action" in his book The
ioner in 1983. This address describes teaching and training as activities, like
fit from the practice of reflection in action: "It involves a surprise, a
rise by thought turning back on itself, thinking what we‟re doing as we do
 blem of the situation anew, conducting an action experiment on the spot by
  solve the new problems we‟ve set, an experiment in which we test both
 eeing the situation, and also try to change that situation for the better." He
 visation and good conversations to the same dynamic. He relates reflection
tific practice as a complement: you have to be able to set up a problem (an
e activity) to be able to apply rules and theory (scientific thinking). The
hat the two practices, scientific discourse and reasoning, along with
 n, provide a basis for effective communication particularly between
     disciplinary integration, particularly as it relates to people and their
ecific contexts of use, is the domain of the technologist.



ent projections by the US Census Bureau by 2050 there will be no majority
  oup in the United States. America stands on the threshold of change, rapid
 nge and changes in cultural diversity. The classrooms and workplaces of
  filled with more women, ethic minorities, immigrants and older workers.
 es to service economy there will be a greater need to understand and
 eractions of these various groups- if not, all of society will be losers.
o help prepare students to understand these various cultures. Technology
 ed the interactions of various subcultures and groups through the use if e-
 ing, the internet, cell phones and the like. Advancing technology allows
  ous communication between people and between groups of people
  out the world. It even serves to bring live broadcasts of often chilling news
our own living rooms. Complicating the process is the rapid pace of
vancement. All of these factors will combine to create a future of conflict
classroom and the workplace. A tight labor market makes in more and
hat all of America will be studying and working beside people who have
y left out of the labor force. In order to understand the importance of
d to be aware that the world economies are interconnected- largely due to
nces in technology. Diversity is one of the pivotal issues of our time. Issues
 ism do not affect just one group. They affect everyone. Inclusion leads to
ybody wins.
   have become more diverse, there has been increasing tension between the
  the reality of diversity with respect to team process and performance. The
explains that diversity will lead to an increase in the variety of perspectives
   It can lead to opportunities for knowledge sharing and lead to increases in
 ativity and quality. The existing evidence points to a more pessimistic
mistic viewpoint explains that diversity creates division. The social
 to negative performance outcomes for the group. To fully comprehend the
  ty, one must understand a variety of factors, including how diversity is
 gorized. It is also necessary to explore the linkage between diversity, the
erformance.
ization schemes based on diverse factors have been used to refine the
ersity in teams. Using factors to shape the definition of diversity allows
 amine multiple types of diversity and the interactions among them but
  of subgroups. Another method is to use a proportional approach.
proaches allow the consideration of group size, but tends to focus on only
rsity. Therefore, proportional approaches can overestimate relevance




     cultural training helps foster an understanding of cultural differences,
ild diversity. For instance, the translation of one language to another
  understand the concept and implication of the words in the given culture
words. Organizations that actively build diversity can expect fewer staff
sity will also improve customer service.

nement of recruiting and retention strategies is required if an organization is
 to diversity. Metrics are a key component of refining recruiting and
 large employers use diversity scorecards to analyze diversity-related
 tention performance. Tracking diversity data well requires technology.
            of-box” solutions exist. Specific areas of measurable diversity
1.5.0 Team Assessments
                    General      Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-   Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation        ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Carper
M. Carper                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                   10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill               10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                   10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                    10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                 TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General      Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-   Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation        ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Chandler
M. Carper                   8            8               9              9                9               9                 9                9               9
M. Chandler                 9            9               9              9                9               9                 9                8               9
R. DeMik                    9            9               9              9                9               9                 9                9               9
M. DeVore                   9            9             10             10                 9               9                 9                9               9
T. Felton                   9            9               9              9                9               9                 9                9               9
J. Phipps                   9            9               9            10                 9             10                  9                9             10
N. Radziwill                9            9               9            10                 9               9                 9                9             10
S. Stamm                    9            9               9            10                 9             10                  9                9               9
M. Thomas                   9            8               9              9                9               9                 9                9               9
E. Wood                    10           10               9              9                9             10                  9                9             10
                                                                                                                                                 TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General      Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-   Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation        ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Demik
M. Carper                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                   10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill               10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                   10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                  10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                    10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                 TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General      Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-   Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation        ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: DeVore
M. Carper                     8            8               8              9                9               9                 9                9               9
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10               9            10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                     9            9             10             10               10              10                  10               9               9
J. Felton                   10            10               9            10               10              10                  9                9             10
J. Phipps                   10            10               9            10               10              10                  10               9             10
N. Radziwill                10             9             10             10               10              10                  10               9             10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                     9            8             10               9              10              10                  9                9               9
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General        Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-     Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation          ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Felton
M. Carper                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =
   Internal Team    General        Thread      Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment     Comm-unic-     Comm-unic-     pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Phipps
M. Carper                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                     General      Thread
   Internal Team   Communicatio Communicatio    Chat           Application      General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment          n            n       Participation     Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Radziwill
M. Carper                     9            9               9              9                9               9                 9                9               9
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                      9           10               9            10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                     9            9             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                   10            10               9            10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                     General      Thread
   Internal Team   Communicatio Communicatio    Chat           Application      General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment          n            n       Participation     Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Stamm
M. Carper                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General        Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-     Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation          ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Thomas
M. Carper                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
J. Phipps                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
E. Wood                     10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                   TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =

                    General        Thread
   Internal Team   Comm-unic-     Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
    Assessment       ation          ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER: Wood
M. Carper                   10            10               9            10               10              10                  10             10                9
M. Chandler                 10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
R. DeMik                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. DeVore                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
T. Felton                     9            9               9            10               10              10                  10             10                9
J. Phipps                   10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
N. Radziwill                10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
S. Stamm                    10            10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
M. Thomas                   10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10                9
E. Wood                     10           10             10             10               10              10                  10             10              10
                                                                                                                                                  TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =


1.5.1 Team Assessments - Combined
                     General      Thread
    Internal Team   Comm-unic-   Comm-unic-   Chat Partici-   Applic-ation     General       Analy-sis Ref-    Format And        Data Analysis   Did More-Less
     Assessment       ation        ation        pation        Comp-letion    Writing Quality lective Writing     Details           Accura-cy      Than Asked

WORK/RATING (1-10): 1 = low/bad; 10 = high/good; 0 = no contribution
MEMBER
M. Carper                 9.50         9.50          9.50            9.70             9.70            9.70            9.70               9.70            9.60
M. Chandler               9.90         9.90          9.90            9.90             9.90            9.90            9.90               9.80            9.90
R. DeMik                  9.80         9.90          9.70            9.90             9.90            9.90            9.90               9.90            9.90
M. DeVore                 9.80         9.80         10.00          10.00              9.90            9.90            9.90               9.80            9.80
T. Felton                 9.70         9.70          9.70            9.90             9.90            9.90            9.80               9.80            9.80
J. Phipps                 9.90         9.90          9.70          10.00              9.90          10.00             9.90               9.80          10.00
N. Radziwill              9.90         9.80          9.90          10.00              9.90            9.90            9.90               9.80          10.00
S. Stamm                  9.90         9.90          9.90          10.00              9.90          10.00             9.90               9.90            9.90
M. Thomas                 9.80         9.60          9.90            9.80             9.90            9.90            9.80               9.80            9.70
E. Wood                 10.00        10.00           9.90            9.90             9.90          10.00             9.90               9.90          10.00
                                                                                                                                                  TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =




1.5.1 Team General Comments for Improvement
Team Member                                                                  Comments, Observations Related To Team, Overall Project

                                                                                                       TOOL 7
                    I think this has gotten off to a bit of a slow start - primarily due to communications challenges up front. Folks s
                    pretty quickly, once everyone was contacted. Most team-oriented projects I see in industry begin with a vision
                    is. Through sharing this vision, team members get excited about their opportunity to achieve an outcome. To
Carper, Michael     example, I'm not sure we've gotten that yet.
Chandler, Mark      This first assignment was as usual, difficult. I think that for some reason, the e-mail-centric launch of this partic
DeMik, Randy        Overall comments are positive considering the difficulty of starting a new project with little experience or guid


DeMik, Randy        I agree with Evan that comments and grading would be more accurate if assessed later (approx. 1 week after d
DeVore, Mike        The team is coming together nicely. Everyone appears to be very motivated and eager to get started on the pro
DeVore, Mike        We have found a company to study for our project but we still need to decide our specific focus for the project.
DeVore, Mike        We should continue to work on determining reasonable due dates for each component of the assignments.
                    Thank you E. Wood for the protocol documentation submitted for consideration in our Monday night Chat. T
Felton, Jason       adopted and a method for updating revising included in order to continually improve value-added contributio
Guinot, Jeff

                    I believe the team should make an effort to create a baseline of how this scoring will work. A standardized app
                    team member will have an understanding of what others feel are the expectations. This will also make the valu
                    more consistent between team members. Also, do we make this a module-by-module running evaluation, and
                    based on performance as we progress? The only way which seems logical to me at this point is to establish a ba
Phipps, Jared       team members, and then decrease / increase from that as the modeuls progress.
                We need to get an earlier jump on the weekly assignments and do a better job of communicating with Dr. Sinn
Stamm, Scott    concerns and questions.
                The initial assessment was difficult to complete without a rubric defining each of the valuies between 1 and 10
                made an effort. The amount and quality of contribution has been acceptable. Although sufficient, there is alw
                improvement. For example, I would like to increase my communication and collaboration. I think this task wi
Thomas, Mark W. weeks.

                This first assessment was tough to complete accurately and fairly. I have no complaints or problems with anyo
                first assignment was tough as we were all figuring out what to do and what was expected. After Monday nigh
Wood, Evan      on the right page, and clearer expectations should be set. This will help all of us to perform at a high level.
                It seems that it would be more appropriate to do the General Assessment piece with a 1 week lag. Writing the
Wood, Evan      deadline does not allow for a complete picture of the team's performance prior to conducting the assessment.
                                                                       TOOL 8

Wood, Evan      The 1.5 assessments still remain tough to complete prior to the deadline. These need to occur later in the cycle.
                We need to consider how we divide work. It seems that having everyone take a pass at each tool and then com
Wood, Evan      redundant.

                The team has done a much better job with Tool #8 than we did with Tool #7. We are beginning to work better
S. Stamm        keep up the good work
                The development of an agenda is a good thing. However, we're still improving in our ability to stick to the age
                the team's development, I think the key area for us to improve is communications. It's a real challenge to get th
Mike Carper     postings to determine what actionable items are there for any given team member. We need to be clearer abou
                Significant improvement in Tool 8 by team. More work, too. Some of team have more skills at the type of analy
Mark Chandler   this six sigma project with the Chilco data.
M. DeVore       We have found a company to study and have decided on our specific focus for the project.
M. DeVore       We should continue to work on determining reasonable due dates for each component of the assignments.
                                                                       TOOL 9
Carper, Mike    If I could give Evan extra-credit, I sure would. His work has been outstanding in this phase.
                I agree with the approach of using specialists to complete particular sections of work. This helps spread the lo
Carper, Mike
                skills and experience to the team's advantage.
                Continued significant improvement in Tool 9 by team. Better division of work by team lead. Moving from sele
Mark Chandler
                of tools to developing Chilco processes sufficiently to allow use of tools to generate results.
DeMik, Randy    The team tended to post earlier in the cycle which produced higher quality work and a timely delivery of final
                The use of specialist and breaking down assignments seems to work much better and should continue through
DeMik, Randy
                course.
                The team is coming together nicely. Everyone appears to be very motivated and eager to get started on the pro
M. DeVore
                work has been good.
M. DeVore       We have found a company to study and have decided on our specific focus for the project.
M. DeVore       We should continue to work on determining reasonable due dates for each component of the assignments.
                With excellent work from our team leaders we have divided up the project work to be completed. The results
M. DeVore
                successful.
                We accelerated the due dates for individual portions of the assignment and hope this allows "compilers" more
M. DeVore
                work
                The team continues to improve and work together well. Members are beginning to assist others to get the assig
S. Stamm
                unfortunate we lost Jeff Guinot as we will all have to share the work he would have been doing.
Wood, Evan      The 1.5 assessments still remain tough to complete prior to the deadline. These need to occur later in the cycle.
                The division of the work was great. I liked using the "specialists". The next step is to have the team review mor
Wood, Evan
                work. It might even be good to have a secondary "specialist" take the work next to make updates.
                                                                       TOOL 10
                Things feel much smoother now. The flow is better within the team. I can't think of anything to ask anyone to
Carper, M.      point.
                I think we made progress on identifying Chilco processes this week, through Pareto and Pie Chart tool. The te
                start aligning other tools, and selecting processes identified in the Pie Chart as being most significant in terms o
                improvement effort. Other resources are being used to suggest modifications of current tools, such as a variatio
Chandler, M.    which may be implemented on a possible Chilco product.
                The project team is working very well together and offering solutions to Chilco objectives in a timely manner.
Demik, R.       good team organization and communication have offered opportunities for peer review and continuity of appl
                The team is coming together nicely. Everyone appears to be very motivated and eager to get started on the pro
M. DeVore       work has been good.
M. DeVore       We have found a company to study and have decided on our specific focus for the project.
M. DeVore       We should continue to work on determining reasonable due dates for each component of the assignments.
                With excellent work from our team leaders we have divided up the project work to be completed. The results
M. DeVore       successful.
                We accelerated the due dates for individual portions of the assignment and hope this allows "compilers" more
M. DeVore       work
                Work is progressing on tools right on schedule. Thanks to feedback from Dr. Sinn, we are updating and revisi
M. DeVore       clarify improve our worksheets.
                It may be time to refine goals of the project - we have a better understanding on the company as well as the pu
Phipps, J       and it seems this is a natural progression at this time.
Wood, E.        The project team is working well now. Early posts and specialists have really advanced the team.
Wood, E.        I think we need to begin looking at tieing this tighter together into an overall portfolio that"hangs" together we
                                                                       TOOL 11
                As best we can, continue to build on earlier tools; for example, the FMEA, benchmarking, others, have been car
Mark Chandler   assignments.
Mark Chandler   Need to continue to evolve the benchmarking tool, as well as use it in this project.
                I'm glad to see we've cut down on the postings in the tools; going from Tool 7 and 140 posts; Tool 8 and 219 po
Mark Chandler   posts; Tool 10/Phase 1 and 132 posts. Tool 8 was pretty hectic.
                We all need to make sure our individual submissions use text boxes (easier to cut and paste across sheets witho
Radziwill       standard fonts throughout.
S. Stamm        We are doing better at pulling together the loose ends of the project and looking at the big picture. We need to
                Discussion Board seemed to be infrequently used this week. While it is good that we have people specializing
Wood, E.        keep up with coordinated efforts to ensure consistency across the board, including all tools and into the FACR
Wood, E.        I think we need to finalize the direction we are heading including: Global, innovation, quality and productivity
DeVore, M.      The team has made some great progress in identifying global issues to be addressed.
DeVore, M.      We continue to build on our success from phase 1. We have identified some new techniques to apply in phase
DeMik, R.       Timely posting of 1.4 ROL has been greatly improved over previous cycles.
                Global decision making is coming along, just need to find correct format/tool/application for analysis and pre
                Format/tools/applications provided in coursework are fine for prouctivity/defect analysis and presentation b
DeMik, R.       initiatives.
Carper          Welcome Nicole.
                                                                     TOOL 12
                I was unable to attend chat and wasn't able to give advance notice. The team gathered things up well and I wa
Carper          to the assignments made.
                I think we have managed to get our focus during Tool 12 in terms of what we need for the many aspects of this
                complements to all who have stayed the course, and when we finally reached a critical level of clarity were ab
Mark Chandler   and produce relevant and linked products.
                I think the yahoo group Mike Carper set up has proved to be a useful tool for getting some types of communic
                filling up the discussion board with more mundane - but necessary - 'operational' communication. I think the a
Mark Chandler   thread for just 'class relate' postings.

DeMik, R.       Timely posting of 1.4 ROL/1.5 eval. has been greatly improved over previous cycles.
                We have made some good decisions on topics to concentrate on and the project is progressing nicely. The team
DeVore, M.      independently and together.

Phipps          We now have the data necessary to "merge" and interweave the earlier parts, as Dr. Sinn has pointed out we ne
                We need to focus more on our FACR generation, and weaving together how all the different applications help
Radziwill       and project objectives. We should all make it a point to contribute to the Grand FACR form by the end of this t
                It is interesting to note that we seemed to have trrned the corner having moved from a reactive approach to a p
S. Stamm
                the aspects of our portfolio development.

                We need to begin developing our FACRs more, tieing them to the finding our data. We have a lot of great wor
Wood, Evan      they don't show up anywhere.
                                                                     TOOL 13

Carper, Mike    Everyone is making such great efforts and the quality of work is impressive.

                I think we have focused the FACR during Tool 13 in terms of what we need for the many aspects of this cours
Mark Chandler   have developed a strong portfolio that will be ready for the Phase II Long and Short forms.


R. DeMik        Team portfolio is near completion and just needs final touches.

R. DeMik        Team synthesis is excellent.

DeVore, M.      We continue to make good progress on each new tool.

DeVore, M.      Our completed final project should be a good example of the successful efforts of a well functioning team.

S. Stamm        We need to determine what is necessary to complete the Project Portfolio as we complete this class.

S. Stamm        This group has been an excellent example of teamwork to complete a task.

                This team has done great work. Everyone has contributed at least 1 significant item during the overall project.
Wood, Evan      developed portfolio.
                                                                         TOOL 14
                   Everyone has done a great job - many, in spite of extreme conflicts outside the classroom. I commend the team
Carper, Mike       of sticking together.


Mark Chandler      I think we have just about finished up the course, have done some excellent work, and learned from the assign


R. DeMik           Team portfolio is near completion and ready for submission on time. Excellent work by all!

DeVore, M.         The end product of our efforts is excellent. We have completed a significant project this semester.
                   By this phase, we live or die as a team. I think this project came together very well… and I think this team deal
Phipps, Jared      circumstances that no other teams in the past have likely faced. I am very pleased with our final effort.

Radziwill          This has been the most pleasant and productive team I've ever worked with in a course. Thanks to all of you.

S. Stamm           This group has been an excellent example of teamwork to complete a task.

                   This team has dne great work. Everyone has contributed at least 1 significant item during the overall project. T
Wood, Evan         developed portfolio.




   Return to 1.0
                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                   8              9              8             8.67
                   9              9              9             8.92
                   9              9              9             9.00
                   9              9              9             9.17
                   9              9              9             9.00
                   9             10              9             9.33
                   9              9             10             9.25
                   9              9             10             9.25
                   8              9              8             8.75
                   9             10             10             9.50
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                           9.08

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team
                   8              9              8             8.58
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10             9.92
                  10             10              9             9.58
                   9             10              9             9.58
                   9             10             10             9.75
                  10             10             10             9.83
                  10             10             10           10.00
                   8              9              9             9.08
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                           9.63

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                   9              9              9             9.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10             9.83
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10             9.83
                  10             10             10             9.92
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                           9.86

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                         10.00

                                      Leader-ship,     Grand Total
       General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
       ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                  10             10             10             9.83
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10             9.67
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                  10             10             10           10.00
                         10             10             10             9.92
                         10             10             10           10.00
    TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                              9.94



                                             Leader-ship,     Grand Total
              General Timeli- Cooper-ation   Prof. Demean-   Per Individual
              ness, Delivery  And Attitude          or         And team




                      9.50            9.70           9.50             9.61
                      9.90            9.90           9.90             9.89
                      9.90            9.90           9.90             9.88
                      9.90            9.90           9.80             9.88
                      9.80            9.90           9.80             9.81
                      9.80          10.00            9.90             9.90
                      9.90            9.90         10.00              9.91
                      9.90            9.90         10.00              9.93
                      9.60            9.80           9.70             9.78
                      9.90          10.00          10.00              9.95
    TOTAL TEAM AVERAGE =                                              9.85




eam, Overall Project



ations challenges up front. Folks seemed to gather up
see in industry begin with a vision of what the outcome
tunity to achieve an outcome. To a certain degree in this

e-mail-centric launch of this particular class lead to
oject with little experience or guidance.


essed later (approx. 1 week after due date).
and eager to get started on the project. The quality of
e our specific focus for the project.
omponent of the assignments.
 ion in our Monday night Chat. This material has been
y improve value-added contribution.


ng will work. A standardized approach means each
tions. This will also make the value of the scores a bit
-module running evaluation, and increase / decrease
me at this point is to establish a baseline score of 7 for all
ess.
b of communicating with Dr. Sinn when we have issues,

 h of the valuies between 1 and 10. I think everyone has
  Although sufficient, there is always room for
 collaboration. I think this task will be easier in future

omplaints or problems with anyone's performance. This
was expected. After Monday night's chat, we should be
us to perform at a high level.
 ce with a 1 week lag. Writing the assessment prior to the
 or to conducting the assessment.



 se need to occur later in the cycle.
 e a pass at each tool and then combining is a little



 We are beginning to work better as a team.. We need to


 ng in our ability to stick to the agenda. At this stage of
 tions. It's a real challenge to get through so many
 mber. We need to be clearer about assignments.
ave more skills at the type of analysis we will be doing in

or the project.
omponent of the assignments.


ng in this phase.
 of work. This helps spread the load and leverage key

 k by team lead. Moving from selection and how to use
 nerate results.
work and a timely delivery of final product.
etter and should continue throughout the rest of the


 and eager to get started on the project. The quality of

 or the project.
 omponent of the assignments.
work to be completed. The results so far have been very

hope this allows "compilers" more time to complete their
 ing to assist others to get the assignments done. It is
 d have been doing.
 se need to occur later in the cycle.
 ep is to have the team review more closely each other's
 ext to make updates.


 hink of anything to ask anyone to improve on at this

 Pareto and Pie Chart tool. The team has been able to
 s being most significant in terms of payback for an
 of current tools, such as a variation on the FMEA tool,

 co objectives in a timely manner. Early posts along with
peer review and continuity of applications.
 and eager to get started on the project. The quality of

or the project.
omponent of the assignments.
work to be completed. The results so far have been very

hope this allows "compilers" more time to complete their

  Sinn, we are updating and revising previous work to

 on the company as well as the purpose of the project,

 advanced the team.
 portfolio that"hangs" together well.


 nchmarking, others, have been carried through several

oject.
7 and 140 posts; Tool 8 and 219 posts; Tool 9 and 109

o cut and paste across sheets without data loss) and

ing at the big picture. We need to continue to do this.
 that we have people specializing on areas, we need to
uding all tools and into the FACRs.
novation, quality and productivity.
dressed.
new techniques to apply in phase 2.

 l/application for analysis and presentation.
 defect analysis and presentation but not for global
 gathered things up well and I was able to quickly adapt

e need for the many aspects of this course project. My
d a critical level of clarity were able to swing into action

r getting some types of communication handled, without
onal' communication. I think the alternative is a specific



s cycles.
ect is progressing nicely. The team is working well both



 as Dr. Sinn has pointed out we need to do.
all the different applications help us reach our course
nd FACR form by the end of this tool.
ed from a reactive approach to a proactive approach to


r data. We have a lot of great work and great ideas, but




or the many aspects of this course project. I think we
d Short forms.




ts of a well functioning team.

we complete this class.




nt item during the overall project. This has led to a well-
e classroom. I commend the team on doing a great job




work, and learned from the assignments and each other.


 nt work by all!

project this semester.
y well… and I think this team dealt with some unique
 ased with our final effort.

 n a course. Thanks to all of you.




 item during the overall project. This has led to a well-

						
Related docs