Dred_Scott

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Dred Scott Dred Scott set foot upon Northern soil. The ruling arguably violated the Missouri Compromise because, based on the court’s logic, a white slave owner could purchase slaves in a slave state and then bring his slaves to a state where slavery was illegal without losing rights to the slaves. This factor upset the Northern Republicans and further split Northern and Southern relations. Scott traveled with his master Dr. John Emerson, who was in the army and often transferred. Scott’s extended stay with his master in Illinois, a free state, gave him the legal standing to make a claim for freedom, as did his extended stay at Fort Snelling in the Wisconsin Territory, where slavery was also prohibited. But Scott never made the claim while living in the free lands—perhaps because he was unaware of his rights at the time, or because he was fearful of possible repercussions. After two years, the army transferred Emerson to the South: first to St. Louis, Missouri, then to Louisiana. In just over a year, the recently married Emerson summoned his slave couple. Instead of staying in the free territory of Wisconsin, or going to the free state of Illinois, the two traveled nearly 2000 km, apparently unaccompanied, down the Mississippi River to meet their master. Only after Emerson’s death in 1843, when Emerson’s widow hired out Scott to an army captain, did Scott seek freedom for himself and his wife. First he offered to buy his freedom from Emerson’s widow, Irene Emerson—then living in St. Louis—for $300. The offer was refused, leaving Scott to seek freedom through the courts. Dred Scott Dred Scott (1799 – September 17, 1858), was a slave in the United States who sued unsuccessfully in St. Louis, Missouri for his freedom in the infamous Dred Scott v. Sandford case of 1857. No one knows exactly when he was born. His case was based on the fact that he and his wife Harriet Scott were slaves, but had lived in states and territories where slavery was illegal, including Illinois and Minnesota (which was then part of the Wisconsin Territory). The United States Supreme Court ruled seven to two against Scott, finding that neither he, nor any person of African ancestry, could claim citizenship in the United States, and that therefore Scott could not bring suit in federal court under diversity of citizenship rules. Moreover, Scott’s temporary residence outside Missouri did not effect his emancipation under the Missouri Compromise, since reaching that result would deprive Scott’s owner of his property. Life Dred Scott was born in Southampton County, Virginia, in 1799 as property of the Peter Blow family. It appears that Scott was originally named Sam and had an older brother named Dred. However, when the brother died as a young man, Scott chose to use his name. The Blow family settled near Huntsville, Alabama, where the Peter Blow family unsuccessfully tried farming. Overview The case raised the issue of a black slave who lived in a free state. Congress had not asserted whether slaves were free once they 1 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In 1830 the Blow family took Scott with them when they relocated to St. Louis, Missouri. They sold Scott to John Emerson, a doctor serving in the United States Army. Scott traveled with Dr. Emerson as he worked throughout Illinois and the Wisconsin Territories, where the Northwest Ordinance prohibited slavery. Emerson met and married Irene Sandford.[1] The couple returned to Missouri in 1842. John Emerson died in 1843. John F. A. Sandford, brother of the widow Irene Sandford Emerson, became executor of the Emerson estate. In 1846 Scott filed suit to obtain his freedom and went to trial in 1847 in a state courthouse in St. Louis. Scott lost the first trial, but the presiding judge granted a second trial because hearsay evidence had been introduced. Three years later, in 1850, a jury decided that Scott and his wife should be freed. The widow, Irene Sandford Emerson, appealed. In 1852, the Missouri Supreme Court struck down the lower court ruling, saying, "Times now are not as they were when the previous decisions on this subject were made." The Scotts were again returned to their masters. (This was more than 20 years after slave Charlotte Dupuy filed a suit in Washington, DC for freedom against her master Henry Clay, US Representative and Senator from Kentucky, and most recently Secretary of State (1825-1829). The grounds of her 1829 case were different, but the Court ordered her to remain in Washington while it was heard. Each such case created a challenge to slavery. Clay took her enslaved husband and children back to his plantation in Lexington, Kentucky. The court ruled against Dupuy, and Clay had her transported to New Orleans, where she worked for his daughter and son-in-law. Finally in 1840, Clay freed Dupuy and her daughter. In 1844 he freed her son Charles, who had accompanied him on speaking engagements.)[2] With the aid of new lawyers (including Montgomery Blair), the Scotts sued again in federal court. They lost and appealed to the United States Supreme Court in Dred Scott v. Sandford. In 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion, that: • Any person descended from black Africans, whether slave or free, is not a citizen of the United States, according to the Declaration of Independence. Dred Scott • The Ordinance of 1787 could not confer freedom or citizenship within the Northwest Territory to black people. • The provisions of the Act of 1820, known as the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act because the act exceeded the powers of Congress, insofar as it attempted to exclude slavery and impart freedom and citizenship to Black people in the northern part of the Louisiana cession.[3] In effect, the Court ruled that slaves had no claim to freedom; they were property and not citizens; they could not bring suit in federal court; and because slaves were private property, the federal government could not revoke a white slave owner’s right to own a slave based on where he lived, thus nullifying the essence of the Missouri Compromise. Taney, speaking for the majority, also ruled that since Scott was an object of private property, he was subject to the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution which prohibits taking property from its owner "without due process". Gravesite After the ruling, with Sandford in an insane asylum, Scott was returned as property to Irene Emerson. However, in 1850, Emerson had remarried to an abolitionist, Calvin C. Chaffee, who shortly thereafter was elected to Congress. In a bizarre turn of events, Chaffee was apparently unaware that his wife owned arguably the most prominent slave in America until a month before the Supreme Court decision. Too late to intervene, the severely criticized Chaffee proceeded to have Emerson return Scott to his original owners, the Blow family. As Missouri residents, they could emancipate him. Scott was formally freed on May 26, 1857 and worked as a porter in St. Louis for less 2 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia than nine months before he died from tuberculosis in September 1858. He was survived by his wife and his daughter Eliza Scott (born 1838). Dred Scott was interred in Calvary Cemetery, St. Louis, Missouri. It is a local tradition to place Lincoln pennies on top of his gravestone.[4] Harriet Scott was long thought to be buried near her husband, but it was recently proven that she was buried in Greenwood Cemetery in Hillsdale, Missouri. She outlived her husband by 18 years, dying on June 17, 1876.[5] In 1997, Dred and Harriet Scott were inducted into the St. Louis Walk of Fame. Dred Scott [2] "Charlotte Dupuy", accessed 21 Apr 2009 [3] "Decision of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott Case" [4] http://www.ulstl.org/ Microsoft%20Word%20-%20Dred%20Scot%20Heirs% [5] http://www.sos.mo.gov/archives/ resources/africanamerican/scott/ scott.asp External links • Dred Scott Case Collection: Official Court Documents and Supplementary Information Compiled by Washington University in St. Louis • Revised Dred Scott Case Collection • Biography of Dred Scott by Christyn Elley, Missouri State Archives • Full text of the Dred Scott v. Sandford Supreme Court decision from Findlaw • Dred Scott v. Sandford and related resources at the Library of Congress • Dred Scott Chronology from Washington University in St. Louis • Harriet Scott’s grave located See also • Slavery in the United States • Charlotte Dupuy • Polly Berry References [1] Vishneski, John. "What the Court Decided in Dred Scott v. Sandford". The American Journal of Legal History 32(4): 373-390. Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott" Categories: 1799 births, 1858 deaths, American slaves, Deaths from tuberculosis, People from Virginia, People from St. Louis, Missouri, People from Missouri, Infectious disease deaths in Missouri This page was last modified on 21 May 2009, at 00:28 (UTC). All text is available under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License. (See Copyrights for details.) Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a U.S. registered 501(c)(3) taxdeductible nonprofit charity. Privacy policy About Wikipedia Disclaimers 3