Lecture11

Reviews
Shared by: Saimethun G
Categories
Tags
Stats
views:
3
rating:
not rated
reviews:
0
posted:
5/24/2009
language:
UNKNOWN
pages:
0
INDUCTORS Inductance is ubiquitous: Ampere's Law: ∇ × H = J + ∂D ∂t i(t) Let ∂/∂t ≅ 0 Example—printed circuit: x σ=∞ da W c z y c i(t) d << W îc H • ds = ∫A J • da ∫ = 0 around both wires = i(t) around the top wire Magnetic Field H: Outside: H ≅ 0 Inside: ˆ H ≅ − yi W (since d << W we ignore fringing fields) L11-1 INDUCTANCE Quasistatic Behavior (∂/∂t ≅ 0): ∂∂ + v(t) Side view: y 1 d z=D Ey(t,z) 2 z H(t) i(t) Maxwell’s Equations: Faraday’s Law: 0 ∇ × E = −∂B ∂t E y ( t,z ) d = − (µzd W ) di(t) dt [recall H = i/W] ⇒ ∫c E • ds = − d ∫A µH • da dt Therefore when z = D: v ( t ) = ∫1 E • ds = −E y d = (µDd W ) (di ( t ) dt ) 2 Note: Dd = cross-sectional area A v(t) = L di(t)/dt where L = µA/W Henries Note: Kirchoff’s voltage law not obeyed here; Ey = f(z) L11-2 SOLENOIDAL INDUCTORS N-Turn Solenoidal Inductor: v ( t ) = ∫1 E • ds = −E y d = (µDd W ) (di ( t ) dt ) 2 y W Wj v j ( t ) = (µDd W j ) (di ( t ) dt ) for jth turn But: W = NW j v ( t ) = Nv j ( t ) Therefore: v ( t ) = N2µDd W (di ( t ) dt ) ; Dd = A D ( ) i(t) d Inductance of N-Turn Solenoid: Magnetic Energy Storage: Wm = µ H ( t ) 2 L = N2µA/W Henries 2 J m-3    2 2 2 = µAW (Ni W ) 2 [J] w m = µDdW H ( t ) Therefore: [recall H = Ni W ] L11-3 w m = Li2 ( t ) 2 [J] RESISTIVE INDUCTORS Single-Turn Inductor: Conductance of slab of cross-sectional area S: σS [Siemens m] Resistance of slab of length D: D/σS [ohms] Resistance of a single-turn inductor: 2(D + d)/σS [ohms] (S = δW) Resistance of an N-turn inductor: 2N(D + d)/σ(S/N) = 2N2(D + d)/σS L/R Time Constant of Solenoidal Inductor: τ = L/R seconds = N2µA W (e.g. i(t) = io e −τ τ ) R L W(N turns) ( ) (2N2 (D + d) σS ) ≅ µdδσ 2N where D >> d , S = δW, A = Dd For finite size and mass, τ is limited ! Want d → D , δ → d 3 , N → 1 , d → W D s δ i(t) d L11-4 TRANSFORMERS Air-Wound Solenoidal Transformers: E • ds = − d ∫A µH • da îc ∫ dt Say A1 = A2, W1 = W2 here Ni = number of turns in coil i Therefore: + v2(t) i1(t) W1 + v1(t) W2 A Step-up and Step-down Transformers: The voltage induced in one turn of coil 2 is the same as induced in one turn of coil 1, And the total voltage induced in coil 2 is N2/N1 times the total voltage induced in coil 1, regardless of whether it is generated by i1 or i2. N2/N1 is called the transformer turns ratio N2 N1 N N 1 2 Step-up or step-down the output voltage, correspondingly. The flux coupling between the two coils may be imperfect and the output voltage is correspondingly reduced [flux Λ = µHA, and linked flux = NµHA]. L11-5 IRON-CORE TRANSFORMERS (1) Boundary Conditions: H// and B⊥ are continuous across the boundary (∇ × H = J + ∂D ∂t; ∇ • B = 0 ) µo B2 µ >> µo H // B and B = µH µ µo can be as large as 106 . Since µ >> µo , B1 is essentially parallel to the interface, and trapped within the high permeability medium. The magnetic flux B is "trapped" inside. H2// B1 L11-6 IRON-CORE TRANSFORMERS (2) Flux trapping inside high permeability materials: The magnetic flux density B is trapped inside high-permeability materials, e.g.: i(t) Flux Λ = ∫A B • da ≅ constant Cross-sectional area A B Transformer Output: v2(t) = (N2/N1)v1(t) The flux is highly linked with little leakage v1(t) N1 turns + B + v2(t) N2 e.g. iron L11-7 INDUCTANCE OF IRON TOROID (1) Inductance L of N turns around toroid (N2 = 0): Recall: wm = Li2 (t) 2 = ∫V Wm dv [J] = ∫V µ H where Wm = µ H(t) 2 ( 2 2 dv ) 2  −3  Jm  i(t) N turns 2R Area A Volume V Example: Constant Area Toroid Since: L = µ ∫V H(t) dv i2 (t) ( 2 ) ∇ × H = J + ∂D ∂t ⇒ îc H • ds ≅ Ni(t) ∫ ≅0 Therefore: 2πR H ≅ Ni (R varies slightly over A) 2 2 L ≅ µ ∫V (N 2πR ) dv ≅ µ (N 2πR ) V ≅ µN2 A 2πR [Henries] where V ≅ 2πRA  3  m  L11-8 INDUCTANCE OF IRON TOROID (2) Inductance L of a toroid with a gap: ] w m = Li2 (t) 2 = ∫V Wm dv [J Recall: 2  −3  Wm = µ H(t) 2 Jm  where 2 Therefore: L = µ ∫V H(t) dv i2 (t), as before i(t) 2R gap d[m] ( ) Finding H(t) : Since: îc H • ds ≅ Ni(t) ∫ ∇ • B = 0, so µoHo = µH where we assume µ >> µo ! (we require d > 2πR (µo µ )2 ) Therefore: Hµ (2πR − d ) + Hµo d ≅ Ni(t) But Therefore: Magnetic energy density in gap is (µ/µo)2 greater than inside the torus, and dominates unless (µ/µo)2 << 2πR/d L11-9 INDUCTANCE OF IRON TOROID (3) Inductance L of a toroid with a gap: Recall: L= µ(t)∫V H dv i2 Hµ ( 2πR − d ) + Hµo d ≅ Ni(t) Where: Hµo d ≅ Ni(t) for a small gap with little fringing (d << A0.5) and we neglect the energy storage inside the torus L ≅ µAd (N d) or, for a small-gap torus: 2 ( 2 ) i(t) 2R gap d[m] Therefore: L ≅ µo AN2 d Henries 2 ! provided that d > 2πR (µo µ ) L11-10

Related docs
Lecture11
Views: 0  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture11
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Finance Lecture11
Views: 320  |  Downloads: 7
lecture11_1_
Views: 3  |  Downloads: 0
ECE329_Lecture11
Views: 1  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture11 - User Interface Design
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
lecture11_WCDMA_Performance
Views: 4  |  Downloads: 1
premium docs
Other docs by Saimethun G
readmeas
Views: 22  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture18
Views: 35  |  Downloads: 1
Lecture17
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture16
Views: 23  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture15
Views: 38  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture14
Views: 21  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture13
Views: 64  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture12
Views: 17  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture11
Views: 14  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture10
Views: 39  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture09HP
Views: 13  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture09GP
Views: 10  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture09BP
Views: 27  |  Downloads: 0
Lecture09
Views: 48  |  Downloads: 1
Lecture08
Views: 50  |  Downloads: 0