# antenna_noise by rite2methun

VIEWS: 41 PAGES: 11

• pg 1
```									Noise in Antennas
Thus far we have examined how to calculate the power radiated from an antenna and, using the Friis transmission formula, how to calculate the received power at the other end of a communication link. However, the received signal power is meaningless unless compared with the power received from unwanted sources over the same bandwidth. Such noise sources include thermal radiation from the earth and sky, cosmic background radiation, and random thermal processes in the receiving system. In today’s wireless environment, additional noise due to nonstationary radio frequency interference from pagers, cellular phones, etc., often needs to be considered, but in this analysis we will concentrate on natural sources only.

1
1.1

Natural Sources Characterized
Brightness

Consider the source/receiver conﬁguration shown in Fig. 1. The brightness of the source is

R 1 sq m collecting area

Source with finite area

Figure 1: Radiation from a natural source.

deﬁned to be the electromagnetic ﬂux density (power per unit area) at the receiver per unit

solid angle of source. By dimensional analysis, Power m2 1 m2 /R2 Power · R2 = Brightness. m2 · m2

=
at source

at collector

From the dimensional analysis we can see that an equivalent deﬁnition of brightness is power per unit area of source per unit solid angle of receiver. Monochromatic brightness is brightness per unit frequency. Often the term “brightness” only is used, without the monochromatic qualiﬁer; the meaning is usually clear from the context. Contrast the deﬁnition of brightness with that of ﬂux density: power ﬂow per unit area. Brightness is suitable for extended sources, while ﬂux is suitable for point sources, as shown in Fig. 2. Each cross-sectional area (S, S , S ) intercepts the same total power, but the ﬂux

S" S’ S
Po w er

source

flux

=

P/S

P/S’

P/S"

Figure 2: Power ﬂux from a point source.

density decreases as energy propagates away from the source. The power intercepted by a receiver at any point is the ﬂux density times the eﬀective aperture of the receiver, a relation which we have already used many times when calculating the power received by an antenna.

1.2

A blackbody is an idealized body which absorbs all electromagnetic energy at all wavelengths impinging upon it. Since an object in thermal equilibrium emits energy at the same rate that it absorbs energy, a blackbody also radiates electromagnetic energy at all wavelengths. 2

Although no blackbodies exist in nature, many objects (e.g., the sun) behave approximately like blackbodies over a range of frequencies. From Planck’s Law, the total power per unit frequency radiated isotropically from a unit area of blackbody at temperature T is 1 2πhν 3 , c2 ehν/kT − 1

Pν =

(1)

where ν is the frequency, h is Planck’s constant (6.63×10−34 Joule sec), and k is Boltzmann’s constant (1.38 × 10−23 Joule Kelvin−1 ). The MKS unit used for Pν is the Jansky, named after Karl Jansky, who discovered early in the 1930’s that the galaxy is a source of radio emissions and hence became the “father of radio astronomy” (1 Jy = 10−26 W m−2 Hz−1 ). At long wavelengths, where hν approximation gives Pν ≈ 2πhν 3 kT 2πkT . = 2 c hν λ2 kT (or, equivalently, ν 2 × 1010 T ), the Rayleigh-Jeans

(2)

What is the (monochromatic) brightness of a blackbody? Consider a spherical blackbody of radius a. Conservation of energy requires that the power emitted from the blackbody is equal to the power intercepted by a concentric sphere of radius R. Since the power is radiated from the blackbody isotropically, we can write

4πa2 Pν = 4πR2 Pν ,

where Pν is the power (per unit area per unit frequency) leaving the surface of the blackbody and Pν is the power at any point at radius R. Rearranging, we get a Pν = Pν R
2

,

3

and substituting for Pν from Eq. 1, a 2πhν 3 1 c2 ehν/kT − 1 R
2

Pν =

Watts m−2 Hz−1 .

(3)

Equation 3 gives the received ﬂux density per unit frequency at radius R. Then, by deﬁnition, the brightness is the received ﬂux density per unit frequency per unit solid angle of source: Bν = 1 1 2πhν 3 a 2 c2 ehν/kT − 1 R πa2 /R2 1 2πhν 3 a 2 R2 = c2 ehν/kT − 1 R πa2 2hν 3 1 = 2 hν/kT Watts m−2 Hz−1 sr−1 , c e −1

(4)

which diﬀers from Eq. 1 dimensionally and by a factor of π in magnitude. The corresponding Rayleigh-Jeans approximation is Bν → 2kT , λ2 hν kT

1.

(5)

1.3

Antenna Temperature

How do we calculate the power captured from an extended source? In Fig. 3 we show a narrow beam antenna whose pattern is conﬁned to a solid angle dΩ. The beam intercepts

d Extended Source

A eff

Figure 3: Power reception from an extended source.

4

an extended brightness source, which could be either (i) noise background, or (ii) the signal of interest! If the antenna is pointed toward the (θ, φ) direction, how much power is received in bandwidth ∆B? 1 Prec (θ, φ) = Bν (θ, φ)dΩAeﬀ (θ, φ)∆B 2 = = 1 2kT (θ, φ) dΩAeﬀ (θ, φ)∆B 2 λ2 kT (θ, φ)G(θ, φ)dΩ∆B , 4π

where 4πAeﬀ (θ, φ) λ2

G(θ, φ) =

is the gain of the antenna. Note that an extra factor of 1/2 appears in the equations above because antennas can only extract power in a single polarization. Total random power is partitioned between two (any two) orthogonal polarizations. The total power received by the antenna is Ptotal = k∆B 4π G(θ, φ)T (θ, φ)dΩ
4π

(6)

= k∆BTant where 1 4π

Tant =

G(θ, φ)T (θ, φ)dΩ.
4π

(7)

Signiﬁcant contributions to the eﬀective antenna temperature, Tant , can come from a “large” product GT over small “areas of sky” or a “small” GT over large “areas of sky.”

5

2
2.1

Noise in Circuits
Nyquist’s Law

Referring to the left portion of Fig. 4, what is the noise voltage associated with a resistance R at temperature T ? From Nyquist’s Law, the mean-square voltage due to random thermal

Temperature T R + R V + -

T=0

<V >

2

R

Figure 4: Thermal noise in resistors: Circuit models.

processes is

V 2 = 4kT RB

(8)

where B is the bandwidth. From the equivalent circuit at the right of Fig. 4, the power transfer to a matched load is V2 = kT B, 4R which is independent of R. Table 1 gives a few example values for V 2 various values of R, T, B.
1/2

(9)

and kT B for

2.2

Noise in Ampliﬁers

Now consider the noise in an ampliﬁer, as suggested by the black box of Fig. 5. The noise power fed into the ampliﬁer is Nin = kTs B, and we denote the noise power coming out of the ampliﬁer as Nout . (Note that if Rs = Rrad , Ts = Tant .) Since an ampliﬁer at a temperature 6

T (K) 300 ” 30 ”

B (kHz) 5 ” ” ”

kT B (dBm) -197 ” -207 ”

R (Ω) 5 × 105 50 5 × 105 50

V2

1/2

(µV)

6.4 0.064 2.0 0.02

Table 1: Sample resistive noise calculations.
Ts Gain A N in Rs Rs Bandwidth B N out

Figure 5: Noise in ampliﬁers.

greater than 0 Kelvin must supply some noise, Nout > Nin . We can write Nout as Nout = (kTeq B) · A = k(Ts + Tamp )B · A

(10)

The ampliﬁer temperature, Tamp , is treated as though the noise were added at the front end of the ampliﬁer, as shown in Fig. 6. The noise ﬁgure of an ampliﬁer is the signal-to-noise

signal A

k TsB

k TampB

Figure 6: Model for ampliﬁer noise.

7

ratio at the ampliﬁer input divided by the signal-to-noise ratio at the output: (S/N )in Tamp S/(kTs B) =1+ = >1 (S/N )out S/(kTeq B) Ts

F =

(11)

Note that the deﬁnition of noise ﬁgure depends on Ts , which is usually taken as 290 K, corresponding approximately to room temperature. For low noise ampliﬁers (LNAs) it is much easier to work with temperatures alone, rather than noise ﬁgures. For example, for the ampliﬁer chain shown in Fig. 7, we can write the

A1

A2

...

Ts

TA

1

TA

2

Figure 7: Ampliﬁer chain.

signal-to-noise ratio as SNR = S · A1 · A2 · · · kB((((Ts + TA1 )A1 + TA2 )A2 + · · · ) · · · ) S . = Ts + TA1 + TA2 /A1 + · · ·

(12)

Thus, the noise contribution of each ampliﬁer is eﬀectively reduced by the gain of the leading (preceding) ampliﬁers.

2.3

Lossy elements

How do we account for the eﬀects of “lossy” elements, such as attenuators, transmission lines, etc.? In Fig. 8m L represents the fraction of power lost in attenuation. The signal

8

S

L Tphysical Ts
Figure 8: Noise in lossy elements.

power after attenuation is then S(1 − L) and the noise power is kTs (1 − L)B

Nout =

+ kTphysical LB .

The attenuator noise ﬁgure is F = S/(kTs B) (S/N )in = (S/N )out S(1 − L)/(k(Ts (1 − L) + Tphysical L)B) = Ts (1 − L) + Tphysical L Ts (1 − L) Tphysical L . Ts (1 − L) (13)

=1+

If we let α denote the fraction of power transmitted through the attenuator (i.e., α = 1 − L), then we can write another commonly used expression for the attenuator noise ﬁgure: F |Tphysical =Ts = 1 + = 1−α α (14)

α+1−α α

= α−1 . For example, a 10 dB attenuator (α = 0.1) has a noise ﬁgure of 10 dB.

9

We can rewrite the output SNR as (S/N )out = = S(1 − L) k(Ts (1 − L) + Tphysical B S k Ts + Tphysical 1 1−L B . (15)

Hence the equivalent front-end temperature of the attenuator is L −→ ∞ 1−L as L → 1.

Tattenuator = Tphysical

(16)

We are now in a position to calculate the signal-to-noise ratio for an antenna connected to an ampliﬁer: Pt G t G r λ2 1 Pr = , kTsys B (4πR)2 kTsys B

SN R =

(17)

where TA1 TA2 + + ···. A1 A1 A2

Tsys =
1 4π

Tant
4π

+

Tfeed
L Tphysical 1−L

+ TA1 +

Gr Tsky dΩ

ampliﬁer dependent

Due to cosmic background radiation, Tant ≥ 3 K. For fairly eﬃcient systems, values for Tsys might be 20 K (maser), 50 K (FEMT), 100 K (FET). However, other sources of loss not directly associated with the antenna/receiver system might also need to be considered. For example, clouds, raindrops, atmospheric gases, etc., all can act as attenuators for satellite signals. Some of the signal power goes into heating the clouds, and some of the heat from the clouds is radiated into the receiving antenna. This loss can be incorporated into our model as another “L”, as before. Suppose you are running a high performance, high eﬃciency ground station with Tsys ≈

10

30 K, operating at X-band. A stratus cloud might give 1 dB loss (i.e., L = 0.2). Then Psig −→ 0.8Psig

and Tsys −→ 0.8(30 K) + 0.2(300 K) = 84 K.

The ratio of SNRs with and without the cloud is 0.8/84 (S/N )cloud ≈ −6 dB. = (S/N )no cloud 1/30 Even though you’ve only lost 1 dB of signal, your SNR decreases by 6 dB!!! On the other hand, what if Tant is very large, so that L + 1−L

Tant

Tphysical

TAn ?
n

Then Tsys ≈ Tant is dominated by noises propagated from the outside, rather than that introduced by your receiver. This is the case for AM radio (fc ≈ 1 MHz); as long as Pr /(kTant B) 1, you can use almost any receiving system. This is why a very short

antenna (L/λ ≈ 1/300) works well enough, although Rrad for a short antenna is very low and very diﬃcult to match to the receiver!

‘antenna noise.tex’, jb, lt, 5/7/01

11

```
To top