ŗ Eñ 0 - ˆþ Œþ Åû 0/ñ 0 ˜þ ŗ ŗ ô Ì- Ëà À½ ÀÚ¸ø„ÛÇ XfŗúâÇ _Ó7¿âÉ œ # • Mens rea.doc & Racism.doc ality.doc ly civilization.doc rs.doc naissance.doc plement.doc tian ) Part 3 of 16.flv óţ l @ • 5 D < NDEX~1.HTM øţ ø MENSRE~1.DOC D `.rdata @ À.rsrc üE .text @ üE þ @ À.data 0
åð 0
à!
à
U‹ì•ìx SV¾ W… ŗýÿÿV3ÛPSÿ4 @ •…ŗýÿÿVP…ŗýÿÿPÿ0 @ ‹=, @ SSj Sj …ŗýÿÿh €Pÿ׃øÿ‰Eù„{ •…•üÿÿPVÿ ( @ •…˜þÿÿPS…ùÿÿh0@ $ Pÿ @ Sh€ j SS…˜þÿÿh @Pÿ׃øÿ‰Eó„/ SSSj Sÿuüÿ @ SSSjP‰Eøÿ @ ‹øÆEù •G‹ ÷MZš t •ùMZ• u€xt ÿEü@•}ü € |Û•MðSQh Pÿuôÿ @ Wÿ @ ÿuø‹= @ ÿ×ÿuôÿ×ÿ
@ j‰EøY3À }œVñ«…˜þÿÿÆEœD P…˜þÿÿPÿ0 @ ‹uø‹ÆŠ
€÷"…Œ •FŠ:Ët€÷"t@ëò€8"u@€8 tö ŗýÿÿQÿuùj •P…˜þÿÿP…ˆöÿÿh 0@ Pÿ < @ ƒÄ EàPEœPSSSSS…ˆöÿÿSH³ 2 Ř|E 8 ˜ ³ þÿÿPdµ î•|8 Ř|ÿÿÿÿ2 Ř|«Ř|ëŘ| ¨¸ ¬¸ €¸ è ú
! ´ %
ˆ³ APŘ|û³ ä ÇUŘ|ä´ l´ X´
Ô T´
ȳ 3RŘ|û³ Ô Àøûý•H"% „"% ˜¶ }]Ř|<"%
L´ ` ° üý•´]Ř|øøý• -
´ \´ õSŘ|4´ `Âŕ |X´ P´ À´ Œµ 4· , µ ðZŘ| ä´ €´ ÀÂŕ|O[Ř|E Ř|N Ř|ó· $ ൠ•AŘ| •ý• ¸´ öŘ|• p Ř|Àäŕ |o>Ř|b>Ř| ¬¸ €¸ f ðÁŕ | µ Lµ êµ üý• üý•¨¸ µ üý• f E ص 0 L¶ ` ZŘìµ hµ 2 Ř|E 8 ˜ @µ „· î•|8 Ř|ÿÿÿÿ2 Ř|«Ř|ëŘ| ¸º •º «Ř|ëŘ|ŗñ €ñ 7 $ ðý• ˆ>Ř| ¨¸ L¶ f üµ 2 Ř| ˜ €ñ Ôµ ¸ î•| 8 Ř|ÿÿÿÿ2 Ř|«Ř|ëŘ|:% •|h» t i n g s \ A d m i n i s t r a t o r \ D e s k t o p \ * . * E Ř|N Ř|º $ ¸ •AŘ| •ý• •|¨¶ x· î•|p Ř|Àäŕ |o>Ř|b>Ř| ¸º •º > ¸ > @ üý• üý• > E C> J¸
¸
C ŗ· ˜ l· ¸º °¹ ˜ ˜· üý•Ü¹ ˜ Ä· º I N D O W S \ s y s t
2 Ř|E 8 î•|À· 2 Ř|E 8 î•|ì· 2 Ř|E 8 î•|8 Ř|ÿÿÿÿ2 Ř|«Ř|ëŘ| (½ e m 3 2 \ r u n o u c e . e x e E Ř|N öŘ|E Ř|N @¹ •Ř|
˜
C : \ W
Ř|@µ $ ,º •AŘ| •ý• Ř|lµ 3Ř|Åø0 0 0Ð 0 ¹
¹ 0¹
0
d¹
3Ř|
Åû 0
0Ð
0<¹
t¹
•Ř|
0
˜¹ Ð
0
•¹
à{Ŗ|
0
ü 0°¹ ¿7•|xº h½ ˜º Lº h½ Ø7•|h½ `º ‹7•|xº h½ ˜º Lº Åû 0 xº h½ `xŖ|xº h½ ˜º Lº Åû 0 xº ˜þ ¨¼ î•|(½ ¸¼ .@Ř| •º p Ř|Àäŕ|ï@Ř|»@Ř|• °• L ` Ţ ˆ>Ř| Ð ˜ŗ´ úê|%Ö|ë|˜º € #ñ 0 $€|ŗë •| ? • ÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿ؃ øÙ7 î•|8 Ř |ÿÿ«Ř|ëŘ|¸Þ4 À! ÀÚ7 l
ü 0 ÿÿ ÀÚ7 l
¨Ú7 F d½ ؃ øÙ7
#
2 •
; î•|8 Ř|ÿÿ
#
#
˜þ €ñ ŗë|$€| ÿÿ€«Ř|ëŘ|¸Þ 4 À!
ŗ´
¨Ú7 2 2 Ř| ¨ x ð… ¨ ð… ŗÚ72 Ř|ØÜ7î •|èÚ7 ÀÚ7 $iŘ|Ý7î Ř|ÿÿÿÿ2 Ř|ŔŘ|ëŘ|D •|8
[6ø [6
xÛ7 @Û7 Û7 ÈŘ|ŗ ìÛ7QŘ|Ø mŘ|$Ü7€Ü74ÀlÝ78Ř| ŔŘ| ŗ ø Ö4Ř|$Ü7 ŒÛ7 MŘ|ŗ |Û7 ÈŘ|Ѓ HÜ7QŘ|¸
mŘ| @ 4 À €Ü7^µ ìÜ7 ìÜ7 ÐCöwÿÿ 8Ý7 ,è7 ðv œ|ÝCôwðvœ| öø0æø0ˆþ Œþ Åû 0 ñ 0 ˜þ ŗ´ ŗ´ €ñ Àäŕ |•ř| À½ ð 0ø½ ˜þ À½ À½ €ñ ø½ Ëà DocsìÍ Üð 0ø½ [ ¶ yÛÉ XfŗúâÇ ðº¶yÛÉ # • Docstoc Public Documents ics_by_n._gregory_mankiw__4_ed_2006.pdf ard_AGPS_PDF_Guide.pdf.url üý•´]Ř|øøý• % ؾ ľ x¾ Ⱦ õSŘ| ¾ `Âŕ |ľ ¼¾ ,¿ ø¿ Á , Œ¿ ðZŘ| P¿ ì¾ ÀÂŕ |O[Ř|@ DOCSTO~1 DOC õSŘ|X¿ ðÁŕ||¿ ¸¿ üý•-Ü WŘ| „¿ „¿ „¿ , DÀ therefore, mens rea refers to the mental element of the offence that accompanies the actus Reus. In some jurisdictions, the terms mens rea and actus Reus have been superseded by alternative terminology. Each of these classes depends on the presence or absence of foresight and a second element usually expressed as "desire". In this context, the word "desire" is dispassionate. For instance, one may visit a dentist for treatment, recognizing that this is necessary, yet having little or no "desire" to do so. Nevertheless, the requisite intentionality is present in the decision to seek treatment because one desires what is necessary no matter that it may be unpleasant. Hence, the essence of this second element is that, whether subjectively or objectively, the accused wishes or aims to cause the foreseen consequences to occur. Intention is where the accused has a clear foresight of the consequences of his actions and desires those consequences to occur. Knowingly is where the accused knows or should know that the results of his conduct are reasonably certain to occur. Recklessness is where the accused foresees that particular consequences may occur and proceeds with the given conduct not caring whether those consequences actually occur or not. Criminal negligence occurs where the accused did not actually foresee that the particular consequences would flow from his actions but the reasonable person, in the same circumstances, would have foreseen those consequences. As an example of the four types of mens rea, consider a person who walks into a room which is in darkness: Knowing that it is full of valuable china objects, his objective or aim being to cause the maximum amount of damage; Knowing that it is full of valuable objects, but simply blundering about rather than reaching for the light switch; Knowing that it is full of valuable objects, but hoping to walk quickly to the centre of the room where the main light switch is located without damaging anything; Without being aware of there being anything specifically valuable in the room, not knowing where the light switch is, and hoping to find somewhere quiet to sit. In each of these four instances, damaging some of the china objects would be intentional, reckless, and criminally negligent if the reasonable man would have taken more care when entering a room with which he was not familiar. Ignorance of the law and mens rea
The general rule under U.S. law is that "ignorance of the law or a mistake of law is no defense to criminal prosecution." See Cheek v. United States, 498 U.S. 192 (1991). There are exceptions to this rule which are sometimes referred to as "specific intent" crimes. For example, in the case of tax evasion under 26 U.S.C. § 7201 the defendant must be shown to have a specific intent to violate an actually known legal duty. Subjective and objective tests the test for the existence of mens rea may be: Subjective where the court must be satisfied that the accused actually had the requisite mental element present in his or her mind at the relevant time; Objective where the requisite mens rea element is imputed to the accused on the basis that the reasonable person would have had the mental element in the same circumstances; or Hybrid where the test is both subjective and objective. The court will have little difficulty in establishing mens rea if there is actual evidence, say because the accused made an admissible admission. This would satisfy a subjective test. But a significant proportion of those accused make no such admissions. Hence, some degree of objectivity must be brought to bear as the basis upon which to impute the necessary component(s). It is always reasonable to assume that people of ordinary intelligence are aware of their physical surroundings and of the ordinary laws of cause and effect (see causation). Thus, when a person plans what to do and what not to do, he will understand the range of likely outcomes from given behaviour on a sliding scale from inevitable, probable, possible to improbable. The more an outcome shades towards the inevitable end of the scale, the more likely it is that the accused both foresaw and desired it, and, therefore, the safer it is to impute intention. If there is clear subjective evidence that the accused did not have foresight, but a reasonable person would have, the hybrid test may find criminal negligence. In terms of the burden of proof, the requirement is that a jury must have a high degree of certainty before convicting. It is this reasoning that justifies the defenses of infancy, and of lack of mental capacity under the M'Naghten Rules and the various statutes defining mental illness as an excuse. Self-evidently, if there is an irrebuttable presumption of doli incapax or the accused did not have sufficient understanding of the nature and quality of his actions, the requisite mens rea is absent no matter what degree of probability might otherwise have been present. For these purposes, therefore, where the relevant statutes are silent and it is for the common law to form the basis of potential liability, the reasonable person must be endowed with the same intellectual and physical qualities as the accused, and the test must be whether an accused with these specific attributes would have had the requisite foresight and desire. Recklessness (willful blindness) In such cases, there is clear subjective evidence that the accused foresaw but did not desire the particular outcome. When the accused failed to stop the given behaviour, he took the risk of causing the given loss or damage. There is always some degree of intention subsumed within recklessness. During the course of the conduct, the accused foresees that he may be putting another at risk of injury: A choice must be made at that point in time. By deciding to proceed, the accused actually intends the other to be exposed to the risk of that injury. The greater the
probability of that risk maturing into the foreseen injury, the greater the degree of recklessness and, subsequently, sentence rendered. Criminal Negligence Here, the test is both subjective and objective. There is credible subjective evidence that the particular accused neither foresaw nor desired the particular outcome, thus potentially excluding both intention and recklessness. But a reasonable person with the same abilities and skills as the accused would have foreseen and taken precautions to prevent the loss and damage being sustained. Only a small percentage of offences are defined with this mens rea requirement. Most legislatures prefer to base liability on either intention or recklessness and, faced with the need to establish recklessness as the default mens rea for guilt, those practicing in most legal systems rely heavily on objective tests to establish the minimum requirement of foresight for recklessness. Mens rea under the American Law Institute Model Penal Code Prior to the 1960s, mens rea was a very slippery, vague and confused concept. Since then, the formulation of mens rea set forth in the Model Penal Code has been highly influential throughout North America in clarifying the discussion of the different levels of mens rea. The four levels of mens rea set forth in the MPC are: Purposely - Express purpose to commit a specific crime against a particular person; for example, to shoot an arrow at someone and hit him. Knowingly - Knowledge that one's actions would certainly result in a crime against someone, but did not specifically intend to commit that crime against the particular victim which one is accused of injuring; for example, to shoot an arrow at A but hit B. This also covers the concept of willful blindness. Willful blindness is where a person knows that something is very probable, but avoids investigating to gain that knowledge. Often used against drug mules, who knew that it was highly likely that there was contraband in the vehicle, but refused to look. Recklessly - Knowledge that one's actions had an unjustifiable risk of leading to a certain result, but did not care about that risk ("reckless disregard"), and acted anyway; for example, to shoot an arrow in the air in a crowded place. Under the MPC, barring contradictory statutory language, recklessness is the minimum mens rea that will lead to criminal liability. This covers the "depraved heart" state of mens rea, which is an extreme disregard for human life. Examples include playing Russian Roulette, street racing, and other highly dangerous activities. Negligently - Did not intend to cause the result that happened, but failed to exercise a reasonable duty of care to prevent that result (which includes failing to become aware of the risk of that result.) The above is the tort standard of negligence. In general this is not enough for criminal liability. Criminal negligence is a "gross deviation" from the standards of normal conduct and includes a substantial and unjustifiable risk. For example, one might be negligent for failing to put up a fence to keep children away from your pool. This will not lead to criminal charges. Criminal negligence might include keeping a vicious dog tied to a tree with twine. Some commentators like to add on a fifth uncodified level, which exists in practice if not in the idealized Model Penal Code, which is, after all, merely a guide for states to follow in the development of their own criminal code. It should be kept in mind
that the MPC is, in and of itself, not the law of the land anywhere, though many states have followed it to some degree or another. Strict liability - Strict liability is usually for "public welfare" offenses, like parking tickets, environmental regulations, and other such things. § 2.05(2)(a) of the Model Penal Code states where the mental state of the defendant bears no relevance to the prosecution of the offense then it is not a crime but a violation (and thus only enforceable by fine or forfeiture and not by imprisonment); the act itself is enough for conviction. Strict liabilty is rather rare in criminal law, but it does happen. For instance, statutory rape is a strict liability crime in some North American jurisdictions. Therefore even if the defendant believed the child to be over the age of consent, the defendant is still guilty of statutory rape if the child is underage even if the child lied about his or her age.
References Stephen J. Morse, 2005, "Inevitable mens rea.: An article from: Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy" Amanda J. Moore, 2004, "Mens Rea: Guilty Mind" Sherry Argov, 2006, "Why Men Marry Bitches: A Woman's Guide to Winning Her Man's Heart" Neil Boyd, 2003, "The Beast Within: Why Men Are Violent" Lakambini A Sitoy, 1998, "Mens rea and other stories (Contemporary Philippine fiction)" Dr. Shafqat Ali, 2004, "Mens Rea" John Kaplan, Robert Weisberg, and Guyora Binder, 2004, "Criminal Law: Cases and Materials" Christopher Slobogin, 2006, "Minding Justice: Laws That Deprive People with Mental Disability of Life and Liberty"
Mens Rea
PAGE
12
' ç è í • ˜ « ® Í
(
… ř ì
ð
i
m
È
ì
í
ò
ř ™ [
_
! " ' • ŗ Ê øèøÞÑÅÞ¸«¸«¸¡¸ŕ¸Š¸}¸¡¸ŕ¸p¸p¸f¸ŕ ¸Y¸ hl/ƒ h%-É OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒOJ QJ ^J hl/ƒ h ?• OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒ hú OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒ h>g‰ OJ QJ ^J h*JF OJ QJ ^J h²Iñ OJ Q J ^J hl/ƒ h`J˜ OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒ hl/ƒ OJ QJ ^J hŢ5 OJ QJ ^J aJ h=tº hŢ5 OJ QJ ^J hŢ5 OJ QJ ^J - h]Lã ; •B* OJ QJ ^J ph
hŢ5 OJ ( T è
QJ " ú ‡ ˆ ‰ Š ‹ Œ ð è Ü Ñ · « Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ Ÿ „Ðdà `„Ðgdl/ƒ „Ðdà `„ÐgdŢ5 $ Æ À!
è Ÿ
è è Ÿ è è
„Ðdà ¤ ¤ [$ \$ ]„Ða$gdŢ5 $ dà a$gdŢ5
Æ Æ
à À! à À!
dà dà
gdŢ5 dà a$gdŢ5
gdŢ5 $ u; Á; ýý
Œ • Ţ • • Ř ř w ù o # ‰ Š ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ç ç ç ç Û Û Û Ï Ï Ã · · ¯ dà gd q7 „Ðdà `„ÐgdÀb± „Ðdà `„Ðgdq7 „Ðdà `„Ðgd] l • „Ðdà `„Ðgd=VÖ „Ðdà `„ÐgdÎZ_ „Ðdà `„Ðgdl/ƒ Ê Î ÿ ä ï q x ç è ï ] ^ _ | ‡ Š u x ¥ ¯ ? H ñ ÷ " ñæÜÏÂϵϫţÏ«ŗÏţÏŠÏ |ÏoÏbÏUÏUÏ hÀb± h ¸ OJ QJ ^J hÀb± h}@ô OJ QJ ^J hÀb± hŗØ OJ QJ ^J h q 7 hÀb± 5 •OJ QJ ^J h q7 OJ QJ ^J hÄ3± OJ QJ ^J hÀb± h] •l OJ QJ ^J hp G OJ QJ ^J hÀb± h(KY OJ QJ ^J hÀb± hÎZ_ OJ QJ ^J hÀb± hÀb± OJ QJ ^J hÜ+ OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒhl/ƒ OJ QJ ^J hl/ƒ h%-É OJ QJ ^J V ¥ ? ñ * -% % @% ( ( ( + + \+ l, £, 4e/ ó ó ç Û Û Ï Ï Ç Ï Ï Ç Ï Ï ¿ ³ Ï « Ÿ „Ðdà `„Ðgd£ Ç dà gd± • „Ðdà `„Ðgdá%Œ dà gdá%Œ dà gd4EÉ „Ðdà `„ÐgdÀb± „Ðdà `„ÐgdV ¨ „Ðdà `„Ðgd}@ó „Ðdà `„ÐgdŗØ " " % ?% @% ( ( ™* £* + \+ £, ¨, ±, 4- =e/ o/ ›1 ¦1 ·5 Ç5 Û8 Ü8 ü8 9 69 E9 d9 t9 Ŗ9 ±9 óæØÊæ¼æ ¯æ¡æŕ ‰æ{æ{æ{æ{æqgZPZPZPZ h¼PÐ OJ QJ ^J h¼PÐ h¼PÐ OJ QJ ^J h q ç ] ¥
Ä OJ QJ ^J hÀb± OJ QJ ^J h£ Ç hÀb± 5 •OJ QJ ^J h± • hÀ b± 5 •OJ QJ ^J h± • OJ QJ ^J há%Œ hÀb± 5 •OJ QJ ^J hÀb± há%Œ OJ QJ ^J h4EÉ hÀb± 5 •OJ QJ ^J hY6Ø hÀb± 5 •OJ QJ ^J hY6Ø h4EÉ 5 •OJ QJ ^J hÀb± hÀb± OJ QJ ^J hÀb± hY6Ø OJ QJ ^J e/ š1 ›1 ·5 Ü8 Ý8 Þ8 ß8 à8 á8 â8 ã8 ä8 å8 æ8 ç8 è8 é8 ê 8 ë8 ì8 í8 î8 ï8 ð8 ñ8 ó ë ß ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó ó „Ðdà `„Ðgd£ Ç dà gd£ Ç „Ðdà `„ÐgdÀb± ñ8 ü8 79 e9 ŗ9 Ñ9 : 6; q; r; s; t; u; ¿; À; Á; Â; ô ì ì ì ì ì ì ì ì ì ì à Ü à „Ðdà `„ÐgdÀb± $ dà a$ gd dà gd¼PÐ í9 ì ì Þ &: \: ì •: ì ì Ü ¡: Ù: ì ý
Ä ; J
±9 Ð9 Ñ9 ì9 <: [: _: ~: •: : ¹: Ø: ; 5; s; ´; º; »; ½; ¾; ¿; Á; Â; ôéôéôéôéôéôéôéÜÏŲ£²ř²…•Ï ! h` ¯ 0J OJ QJ ^J mH nH h` ¯ h` ¯ 0J OJ QJ U ^J
t;
u;
³
h` ¯ h` ¯ h` ¯ OJ u h` ¯ h` ¯ 0J OJ QJ ^J h` ¯ OJ QJ ^J hÀb± h
QJ ^ % j
Ä OJ QJ ^J OJ QJ ^J °Ð/ °à=!° "° #•
h¼PÐ hn( h¼PÐ h¼PÐ OJ $• %°
QJ
^J
h¼PÐ OJ
QJ
^J
& 1h:pl/ƒ -
œ @ @ñÿ @
N o r m a l
CJ _H D A@òÿ¡ D
aJ
mH
sH
tH
D e f a u l t
P a r a g r a p h
F o n t
V i@óÿ³ V
T a b l e N o r m a l :V ö 4Ö 4Ö l aö ( k@ôÿÁ ( N o L i s t
4 @
ò 4
Ţ5 Æ à À!
H e a d e r B ^@ B
Ţ5
N o r m a l
( W e b )
¤d
¤d [$ \$
4
@
4
` ¯ Æ à À!
F o o t e r . )@¢ ! .
` ¯ P a g e N u m b e r P - ÿÿÿÿ ( T ú ‡ ˆ ‰ ù o
Â3 Š ‹ Œ • Ţ • • Ř ř w
#
q
ç
] ¥ ‰ Š V ¥ ? ñ * @ # \# l$ £$ 4% e' š) ›) ·Ü0 Ý0 Þ0 ß0 à0 á0 â0 ã0 ä0 å0 æ0 ç0 è0 é0 ê0 ë0 ì0 í0 î0 ï0 ð0 ñ0 ü0 71 e1 ŗ1 Ñ1 í1 &2 \2 • 2 ¡2 Ù2 ý2 63 q3 r3 s3 t3 u3 ¿3 Ã3 ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˆ ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € h ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € h ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € h ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € ˆ ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € h ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € ˜ 0 € € p ˜ 0 € € •@ 0 € € ø € 0 Л Ð Í ( T ú š) ›) ·71 ý2 63 q3 r3 s3 Ã3 Oy 0 0 Ø V Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € Oy 0 0 € O9 0 0 € O9 0 0 € O9 0 0 û› TÀý O9 0 0 € O9 0 0 š@ 0 € € € O9 0 0 € O9 0 0 € O9 0 0 O °: ã #
O °: °: Ê ! > 9Ë~ Ë~ # E Ì ã O ã " ±9 Â; " $ ' % & Á; H N !ÿ•€ÿÿ 6Ë~ ÜÜ :Ë~ œÜ ;Ë~ Œ 4ß K e/ K ñ8 K Â; K K N ¡ ôÝ >
œ¡ 7Ë~ <Ë~
\¡ 8Ë~ œÞ =Ë~
] ?Ë~ DË~ GË~ 4 ´¯ Œì! R! G @Ë~ EË~ HË~ G $ ÜZ! AË~ ÔR! FË~ Df! ì ì h3 h3 Ã3 4l ,9S i i BË~ [ [ ÄŢ# • • CË~ Ê Ê ŗøS Ä Ä
4
È
A
A
K
K
($
o3
ð o3
ð Ã3
m
m
_
_
ŗ ŗ Î
Î
È
B com:office:smarttags
*€urn:schemas-microsoft-
€country-region €8 *€urn:schemas-microsoftcom:office:smarttags€City €9 *€urn:schemas-microsoftcom:office:smarttags€place €
[, 1 ý ñ ö ñ 3 ñ0 3 1 3 &2 /2 22 72 ƒ2 3 u3 À3 Ã3 Š2 Ã2 É2
e,
x/ Î
€/ Ð
›
( 3 û0
'& 3 \2 ÿÿ
(& 3 •2
^' c' Y) a) 3 3 3 3 u3 ³3 À3 Ã3 a d n a n $
%1 3
*1 å
71
;1 . #
Ñ1 ú
Ó1 @
u3
À3
Ã3 À3
3 Ã
u3
n( Ü+ Ţ5 q7 ¦7= *JF p G (KY ÎZ_ ]•l l/ƒ >g‰ á%Œ ¨ ¯2© ` ¯ Ä3± Àb± ¸
?• `J˜ ± • V
Ä £ Ç %-É 4EÉ ¼PÐ =VÖ Ŕ |× ŗØ Y6Ø ]Lã ò3è ²Iñ }@ô ÿ@€ ¬ÝŒ Â3 @ ÿÿ U n k n o w n ÿÿ ÿÿ G • ‡z € R o m a n 5 • ‡z € ÿ A r i a l € ÿ C o u r i e r N e w " qˆ ðÐ h gÄ²ÆƒÄ²Æ " Ç+ ] ! ð
ÿÿ ÿ € ?5• ®
ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿÿ T i m e s N e w S y m b o l 3&• ‡z
Ç+
]
®
´ ´ ••24 [3 [3 3ƒQ ð Ü H )ðÿ ? ä ÿÿÿ•ÿÿÿ•ÿÿÿ•ÿ ÿÿ•ÿÿÿ•ÿÿÿ•ÿÿÿ•Ŕ|× ÿÿ ~ M e n s r e a ( f r o m L a t i n , " b a d m i n d " ) i s t h e m e n t a l s t a t e t h a t , i n c o m b i n a t i o n w i t h t h e a c t u s r e u s ( " b a d a c t " ) , p r o d u c e s c r i m i n a l a d n a n a d n a n þÿ , œ < à…Ÿò÷Oh«Ř +'³Ù0 à H T d • t € ˜
¨ ´
À È Ð Ø ä • Mens rea (from Latin, "bad mind") is the mental state that, in combination with the actus reus ("bad act"), produces criminal ensadnan eadnadnaNormal aadnan a34 aMicrosoft Word 10.0 @ •NZ @ óÁ XÇ @ šAXÆ ® Ç+
þÿ œ.Ŗ +,ù®0 ŕ h
ÕÍÕ
h œ ¼ ¤
p ¬
| ´
„
Œ
ŗ
G
ä
-
r
]
[3
A
• Mens rea (from Latin, "bad mind") is the mental state that, in combination with the actus reus ("bad act"), produces criminal
-
Title
! " # $ % & ' ( þÿÿÿ* + , . / 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 þÿÿÿ9 : ; < = > ? þÿÿÿA B C D E F G þÿÿÿýÿÿÿJ þÿÿÿþÿÿÿþÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿR o o t E n t r y ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ À F @u±' XÇ L € 1 T a b l e
ÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿ o c u m e n t
W o r d D ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ (P S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n ( ÿÿÿÿ 8 D o c u m e n t S u m m a r y I n f o r m a t i o n 8 ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ @ C o m p O b j ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ j ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ þÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ þÿ ÿÿÿÿ À F Microsoft Word Document MSWordDoc Word.Document.8 ô9²q
)