South Carolina Government Grants

W
Description

South Carolina Government Grants document sample

Document Sample
scope of work template
							                                                                    Economic Impact of the Arts in...

SOUTH CAROLINA

T
                                                                                       cal years 2001 and 2005); reducing the
OVERVIEW                                                                               number of leased cars from four to
                       he South Carolina Arts Commission’s                             three; replacing a quarterly newsletter
                       (SCAC) mission includes a commitment                            with a less expensive mailed piece; sub-
                                                                                       stituting various print pieces with elec-
                       to excellence across the spectrum of the                        tronic versions; and switching cellular
                       state’s cultures and forms of expression                        phone services for a savings of $160
                       alongside developing a thriving arts en-                        per month. The Commission’s reports
                                                                                       to the General Assembly during several
                       vironment, considered essential to the                          of the review period years noted that
                       quality of life, education, and economic                        the reduction in direct staff interaction
                       vitality of all South Carolinians.1 The                         with the agency’s constituents, such as
                                                                                       grantees and grant applicants (on ac-
SCAC, the state’s principal arts agency, was created as an agency                      count of the travel restrictions), had
of state government in 1967 to develop and implement a com-                            the potential to cause a decline—in
prehensive statewide program to promote the arts and to assure                         the long term—in the high customer
                                                                                       satisfaction rate the agency had previ-
their continued excellence across the state.                                           ously secured.
     As in the case of practically every   lina suffered a precipitous 43 percent
other state, the SCAC’s major source       plunge. Even though in each year after      ECONOMIC IMPACT
of funding is tax dollars appropriated     fiscal year 2002, the level of cutbacks           The SCAC has been very pro-ac-
by the South Carolina General Assem-       declined, cumulatively they amounted        tive in stressing how the arts industry
bly. In addition, the SCAC receives        to a drop from $5.4 million in fiscal       changes lives one-by-one, family-to-
federal government grants adminis-         year 2001 to $3.1 million in fiscal year    family, eventually spreading across
tered by the National Endowment for        2005. These decreases included a 17         communities, schools and the entire
the Arts (NEA) and funds raised from       percent reduction, the highest level        state. To document this trend, the
private foundations and community          between fiscal years 2001 and 2002          SCAC commissioned the University
sponsors. The SCAC is governed by          (from $5.4 million to $4.5 million), 15     of South Carolina’s Moore School of
nine volunteer citizen commissioners       percent between fiscal years 2002 and       Business to carry out a study assess-
appointed for three-year terms by the      2003 ($4.5 million to $3.8 million), and    ing the economic impact of the cul-
governor and confirmed by the state        11 percent and then 9 percent between       tural industry on the state.3 This study,
Senate. The commissioners, assisted        fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 ($3.8      released in April 2002, once again
by a staff of 19 (as of January 2006),     million to $3.4 million to $3.1 million).   clearly demonstrates the tremendous
attend grant panel meetings and con-             In responding to these sharp          economic magnitude of the arts and
vene regularly to take action on fund-     funding reductions during the five-         cultural industry on the state. As in the
ing and formulating policy on the arts     year review period, the SCAC was            case of the studies in so many other
in South Carolina.                         forced to implement a number of             states, even though the results are
                                           cost-cutting measures while continu-        several years old, the sheer enormity
FUNDING FOR THE                            ing to provide quality service.2 Some       of their economic impact is in no way
                                           of these measures introduced during         diluted; in fact, it is possible to com-
ARTS                                       the review period included eliminating      fortably forecast that these economic
     State funding for the arts in South   selected programs and services; slash-      impacts in the ensuing years actually
Carolina came under tremendous pres-       ing most other programs; reducing the       have increased to even greater heights
sure during the review period given the    Commission’s workforce; instituting         from the numbers reported in the past
debilitating effects of the state fiscal   a voluntary and mandatory furlough          few years.
downturn and the need to divert funds      program; holding positions vacant;                In developing a model for the
to other essential programs. In fact,      maximizing cost savings and efficien-       cultural industry, the University of
between fiscal years 2001 and 2005,        cies through a reduction in travel costs    South Carolina study views the cultural
funding for the arts in South Caro-        by more than 30 percent (between fis-       industry in South Carolina as compris-

                                                                                 The Economic Impact of the Arts in the South | 103
Hubbard Street Dance Chicago perform Rooster by Christopher Bruce at the 2005 Spoleto Festival. Photograph by Todd Rosenberg,
courtesy the Spoleto Festival USA.
ing three major activities: heritage and       of the triad, the study calculated the        lina. Specifically, the cultural industry
culture (museums, historical sites and         economic impact of the following:             supports $686.7 million in labor earn-
parks, libraries, K-12 arts education          Spoleto Festival USA (the major in-           ings, 29,348 jobs, and $1.8 billion in
in the state’s schools); performance           ternational festival held annually in         output. In addition, the cultural indus-
and exhibition activities (perform-            Charleston that ranks among the most          try returns more than $44 million a year
ers and performing groups, galleries,          visible aspects of the cultural industry      to the state in sales and income taxes.4
filmmaking); and the individual artist         in the state) and Piccolo Spoleto, the        While the earnings impact amounts to
(ranging from a craftsperson’s artwork         Southeastern Wildlife Exposition,             1.3 percent of total earnings statewide,
featured locally to an artist performing       other cultural and arts festivals, artists,   the employment impact represents 1.6
in the international arena). The study         arts education, cultural organizations        percent of total non-farm employ-
then sought to calculate the economic          and the film industry.                        ment. In other words, of every $100
impacts flowing both to and from this                The study documented that rel-          of wages and salaries earned in South
triad of activities along with the nu-         evance of the arts as a vital cog in the      Carolina, $1.30 can be linked to the
merous businesses that both sustain            complex South Carolina economic en-           cultural industry. Similarly, of every
elements of the triad and also survive         gine is supported by the magnitude of         100 jobs in the state, 1.6 are directly or
because of the triad’s elements. In            its impacts on wages and salaries, jobs,      indirectly linked to the arts. Moreover,
further breaking down the elements             and economic output in South Caro-            of every 200 jobs in the Charleston
                                                                                             metropolitan area, one exists exclu-
Table 23                                                                                     sively because of the outside money
                                                                                             brought in by the Spoleto Festival USA
Economic Impact of the Cultural Industry in                                                  and Piccolo Spoleto. Table 23 encap-
South Carolina                                                                               sulates some of these key measures in
                                                                                             laying out the economic impact of the
                                         Earnings          Jobs               Output         cultural industry in the state.
 Artists                              $23,043,234           870         $120,549,386               In addition, South Carolina art-
 Arts Education                       $98,398,308         3,712         $194,333,580         ists spent a total of $35.8 million on
 Festivals*                           $27,719,877         1,044         $105,444,058
                                                                                             supplies and services across the state.
                                                                                             Based on ensuing multiplier effects,
 Film Industry                        $29,454,420         1,491          $74,521,536
                                                                                             these artists’ activities generated a
 Cultural Organizations              $148,998,123         5,639         $424,936,314         total of $23 million in earnings, 870
 For-profit Organizations            $329,910,001        14,963         $925,471,851
                                                                                             jobs, and $120.5 million of economic
                                                                                             output. Then, festivals across the
 Spoleto USA/Piccolo                  $29,200,138         1,628          $67,799,479         state, excluding Spoleto USA, Piccolo
 TOTAL                               $686,724,151        29,348       $1,913,056,654         Spoleto, and the Southeastern Wildlife
                                                                                             Exposition, spent a total of $40 mil-
Source: University of South Carolina, April 2002
                                                                                             lion in South Carolina. Not only did
* Excludes Spoleto, Piccolo Spoleto, and the Southeastern Wildlife Exposition

104 | The Economic Impact of the Arts in the South
this spending result in a total of $27.7    Table 24
million in labor earnings, it generated
1,044 jobs and $105.4 million in out-       Details on SCAC’s Grants
put.                                        Fiscal Years 2002 through 2005
      The annual Spoleto Festival USA
and Piccolo Spoleto in Charleston are            Year             Amount                Number of               Number of
perhaps the most renowned facets of                                                     Grantees                 Counties
the thriving arts scene in the state.          FY 2002               $2,244,271           398                      42
Spoleto Festival USA has firmly estab-         FY 2003               $2,185,504           368                      42
lished itself as one of the world’s ma-        FY 2004               $2,031,780           347                      42
jor arts festivals, presenting 100 world       FY 2005               $1,911,513           311                      43
premieres and 93 American premieres
since its inception in 1977.5 For 17 days   Source: South Carolina Arts Commission, FY 2002 through 2005 Agency Accountability
and nights each spring, Spoleto Festival    Reports
USA fills Charleston’s historic theaters,
churches and outdoor spaces with over       supported a total of $149 million in               Beyond the 2002 economic im-
120 performances by renowned artists        earnings, 5,639 jobs, and $424.9 mil-       pact study, the SCAC also listed details
as well as emerging performers in disci-    lion in economic output.                    on the grants it provided to various art-
plines ranging from opera, theater, mu-           In a trend that is being replicated   ists and organizations during the review
sic theater, dance, and chamber, sym-       in a vast number of states across the       period.6 These grants are the crucial
phonic, choral, and jazz music, as well     country, the motion picture industry        lifeline to a number of these artists and
as the visual arts. One of the Festival’s   also has been blossoming in South           arts organizations and trigger a con-
tenets is to provide young performers       Carolina in recent years. According         siderably greater amount of economic
the opportunity to work with veteran        to the University of South Carolina         activity than the initial disbursements.
directors, designers and performers.        study, the motion picture industry in       Table 24 lists this grant information for
The Piccolo Spoleto event, launched         South Carolina spent a total of $49.1       fiscal years 2002 through 2005.
in 1979 by the city of Charleston,          million in the state. A majority of these          The impacts of the cutbacks in
complements the main Spoleto Festival       expenditures represents new money to        state appropriations are quickly appar-
USA by providing a venue for local and      the state, that is, money spent by non-     ent from reviewing the data in Table
regional artists. According to the 2002     residents. (Even in the instance of the     24, as not only did the number of
study, an estimated 153,500 visitors at-    Spoleto Festival USA, the money spent       grantees decline each year from fiscal
tended the two events in 2000. These        is a true net addition to the South Car-    year 2002 to fiscal year 2005, the total
attendees spent a total of $43.1 million    olina—and more specifically, Charles-       amount allocated diminished too. This
in the Charleston area. The largest         ton—economy since a bulk of it was          is reflected in the earlier section that
expenditures were on lodging, food          money spent by people living outside        elaborated trends from the state leg-
and beverage, and tickets to the per-       the city). Overall, these direct expen-     islative appropriations to the SCAC.
formances. This spending supported a        ditures support a total of $29.5 million    Specifically, the amount allocated as
total of $29.2 million in labor earnings,   in wages and salaries, 1,491 jobs, and      grants declined from $2.2 million in
the equivalent of 1,628 full-time jobs      $74.5 million in output.                    fiscal year 2002, to $1.9 million in fis-
and $67.8 million in economic output.             Finally, for the first time in the    cal year 2005; similarly, the number of
      According to the South Caro-          University of South Carolina’s series       grantees dropped from 398 to 311.
lina Department of Education, an            of cultural industry impact studies (the           Another brand new event that
estimated $75 million is spent on arts      first was done in 1988), a separate sur-    falls under the category of stimulat-
education for kindergartners through        vey was sent to elicit information from     ing economic activity across the state
12th graders in public schools. This        the for-profit segment of the cultural      is the International Arts Festival of
expenditure by the schools, primarily       industry. Among these businesses are        Greenville, further evidence of an
in the form of salaries, supports a to-     art galleries, craft suppliers, dance in-   arts-related event promoting positive
tal of $98.4 million in earnings, 3,712     structors, and photographers. Based         economic flows. In its 2005 inaugural
jobs, and $194.3 million in output.         on these survey results, a total of 9,126   year, the Festival attracted artists from
Then, the study solicited information       jobs was directly linked to the for-        22 states from as far away as Colorado
from a variety of cultural organizations    profit arts-related firms. Based on the     and Wisconsin who featured ceramics,
including local arts councils, historical   level of business activity and employ-      photographs, jewelry, rugs, paintings,
sites and associations, libraries, muse-    ment at these firms, the study noted a      portraits and other forms of art. The
ums, parks, and other organizations.        cumulative impact of $329.9 million in      Festival’s organizers believe they have
These groups had total expenditures         earnings, 14,963 jobs, and $925.5 mil-      sufficient momentum and interest to
of $159.9 million in South Carolina.        lion worth of economic output, a most       continue it annually.
The operations of these organizations       significant level indeed.

                                                                                  The Economic Impact of the Arts in the South | 105
                                                               the governor’s support       to eligible groups or individuals would
                                                               in promoting a pilot         pivot on the particular project expand-
                                                               program to stimulate         ing and marketing existing cultural
                                                               interest in cultural tour-   offerings to increase cultural tourism;
                                                               ism projects across the      developing and marketing new cultural
                                                               state.7 The push to ag-      offerings to attract cultural tourists;
                                                               gressively promote cul-      building or enhancing partnerships
                                                               tural tourism in South       that increase in-state cultural tourism;
                                                               Carolina surfaced from       attracting new cultural tourists (partic-
                                                               the fact that the state      ularly visitors from outside the state);
                                                               did not make the list of     and collecting data to support a cultur-
                                                               top 10 cultural tourism      al tourism project. Another important
                                                               destination states, even     fact stressed by the initiative included
                                                               though there were five       the numerous partnerships such as
                                                               other Southern states        links between, but not limited to, cul-
                                                               on this list. In securing    ture, tourism, and business organiza-
                                                               the governor’s atten-        tions; and/or public and private sector
                                                               tion beyond the usual        organizations, and/or local, state and
                                                               budgetary assistance,        federal agencies/municipalities. The
                                                               the SCAC director            amount provided as grant money could
                                                               asked the governor to        be as much as $10,000 with a one-to-
                                                               designate a staff liaison    one match between the grant applicant
                                                               for cultural tourism.        and the SCAC.
                                                               The responsibilities of
                                                               this staff liaison would     BUILDING BOOM
                                                               include coordinating               A number of South Carolina
                                                               efforts between the          performing cultural organizations con-
                                                               SCAC and other cul-          tinue to draw throngs of visitors and
                                                               tural agencies/ tourism      arts patrons to their events. One of
                                                               officials to entice more     the more notable organizations in this
Spoleto’s Artistic Director for Choral Activities Joseph cultural tourists to the           connection is the Charleston Stage,
Flummerfelt leads the Westminster Choir at the 2005 Spoleto state and to facilitate         founded by Playwright Julian Wiles in
Festival USA. Photo by: William Struhs, courtesy the Spoleto a continuous dialogue          1978, currently South Carolina’s larg-
Festival USA.                                                  between all the dif-         est professional theater company that
                                                               ferent groups. This,         is in residence at the Historic Dock
                                                               the director stressed,       Street Theater.9 In addition to having
CULTURAL HERITAGE would ensure that the arts and culture                                    presented over 150 productions at the
                                              in South Carolina are used to their full-
TOURISM                                       est potential in promoting the quality
                                                                                            theater, Charleston Stage has played to
      Like so many other states, South                                                      a collective audience of more than 1
                                              of life and economic growth of those          million patrons. The theater company
Carolina, led by the SCAC, is focused
                                              residing throughout the state.                also employs 20 full-time staff, guest
on capitalizing on its many cultural and
                                                    In order to accomplish the goal of      artists, scores of actors, dancers, sing-
heritage sites to promote tourism and,
                                              promoting cultural tourism initiatives        ers and musicians and Theatre Wings
thereby, generate interest in these sites
                                              across the state, the SCAC recently           High School Apprentices. In addition,
(and related activities) as well as create
                                              solicited grant applications from artis-      arts education continues to be a crucial
additional economic opportunities.
                                              tically based projects that would serve       outreach activity of the Charleston
Toward this effect, in an address to
                                              to enhance the state’s capacity in the        Stage, and the theater company offers
Governor Sanford about the SCAC’s
                                              cultural tourism area. 8 The overrid-         a number of educational services to
activities, the SCAC’s director sought
                                              ing objective in providing grant monies       schools throughout the state.




106 | The Economic Impact of the Arts in the South

						
Related docs